| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

TravisWB
53
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 23:37:00 -
[211] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
I do not believe that.
I know for a fact that mineral prices 4 years ago were far below what they are now. In some cases such as NOX by a factor of 10X LESS. By extension, things made out of minerals cost far less as well.
|

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 23:47:00 -
[212] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
I've only been playing for about 3 years, but 50 mil for a drake? You can't expect that to be believable, when since I started up until about 4-6 months ago, you could buy an Armageddon for +/- 40 mil? You may want to check your suppliers if you've been paying 50 mil for drakes for the last 4 years Yes they are 50 mil now, but 4 years ago? dunno, didn't play then, but 3 years ago, try 25 mil. |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
165
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 00:21:00 -
[213] - Quote
I think you might have bit off more than you can chew there, Tippia.
I have Bestowers from a few years ago I wasn't looking at jumps when I bought was too lazy to go get them. I paid just under 500K for them. They now go for 1.1 mill.
I just sold 10 Geddons I paid under 50 mill for, I sold for 90 mill in low sec. My Provi, I paid 600 for, sold for 1.33 billion ISK. The list goes on and on. Hull prices are through the roof.
We have had hulkageddons before, though this time I think more people got fed up and just stopped logging in. That said, back to the OP. You won, gratz. Now what? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg-_HeVNYOk
Save Derpy! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
784
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 00:43:00 -
[214] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
I think you got severely scammed.
Drake prices were generally flat for a long time except March 2010 (29M) and then started the up trend on Dec 2010 when they hit 29.884M and kept slowly rising since then. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
235
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 01:45:00 -
[215] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change. I was interested in this so I downloaded the EVE-Central data dump for May 16, 2008 and checked the typeid 24698 (Drake typeid from current EVE-Central search, no reason to think it's changed).
I found 237 orders with a minimum of 0.01 ISK (I can't tell what's a buy or sell order in the dump) and a maximum of 45,750,000mil. Average is 31.9mil.
So then, still kind of bored, I retrieved the data dump for May 16, 2007, again checked with a typeid 24698, and found 103 orders with a min of 28,000 ISK and a max of 48mil. Average is 30.8mil.
Now, I'm a masochist, so I downloaded the data dump for May 16, 2006 and ran the same checks but the Drake apparently didn't exist then. 
So, just to stress, it's a one-day sample from a source that probably doesn't have all the data.
Also, I like the new prices regardless, so all y'all haters can suck it. +1 in local |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
520
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 01:52:00 -
[216] - Quote
TravisWB wrote:Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change. I do not believe that. I know for a fact that mineral prices 4 years ago were far below what they are now. In some cases such as NOX by a factor of 10X LESS. By extension, things made out of minerals cost far less as well.
I was in that era. Yes, drakes were about 40-50m back then (*plus change as Tippia says*)
Everything was more expensive, and we had less money making power! I was a noob then so I know!
EVE has been getting more and more noob friendly every expansion, not less friendly. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
95
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 02:05:00 -
[217] - Quote
Eaorgan Dax wrote:James 315 wrote:Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. 1 Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. 2 As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. You truly are an idiot aren't you?, you have no clue what you are talking about. Point 1, If mining in high drops further, the price of minerals will go up and the players will start mining again because it's profitable again, all hulkageddon does is restart that cycle over and over and over again. Point 2. Miners have influence over CCP? So, you wanna tell me that's why warp core stabilizers are such pieces of crap and are hopelessly impractical on a mining barge ( it decreases range DRAMATICALLY and you need at least 2 of the freaking things ), so that nobody will ever use them for this, which in fact makes them sitting ducks when something costing 1 10th of the price of a barge, locks, scramble's and shoots them. Time to take off your tinfoil hat mister, if anything, CCP is providing aggressors with more and better tools then it does the industrialists.
Also CCP is FINALLY locking those manifesto threads as the rants they are
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
465
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 02:09:00 -
[218] - Quote
Minerals definitely did go up in price, but as a high-sec/wormhole pvper (read: non-blob), I find that an extremely good thing.
Ptraci wrote:Ammatar IV wrote: So please, before you decide to gift us with your almighty insight do remember, you probably don't know **** about it. Peace. Confirming I have no nullsec experience. Oh wait - I do. Seriously I thought I was helping you but hey whatever, stay in high sec then if it's so hard to find a decent nullsec alliance. Null-sec is a multifaceted environment that encompasses many more features and variables than your run-of-the-mill carebear alliance experience covers. You are not the ultimate authority on all things 0.0.
And it is difficult to find good null-sec groups, if you are not the type of person who enjoys being told what to do, and following authority without question. A lot seem to be led by the type of people who think that three years of being a sergeant in the military magically qualifies them to lead hundreds of people in an environment that is more reliant on knowledge of memes than real-life military protocols.
Have things changed since wormholes came out? I don't know, since I haven't checked. I'm sure you'll provide some valuable insight on the matter. For now, I'll drive up mineral prices some more. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1143
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 04:24:00 -
[219] - Quote
In before rant lock. |

Ares Renton
Smoking Minerals Syndicate Cannabis Legionis
41
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 04:37:00 -
[220] - Quote
This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
524
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 05:39:00 -
[221] - Quote
Ares Renton wrote:This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future.
So say we all! Things are only impossible until they are not. |

knulla
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 06:43:00 -
[222] - Quote
it is way easy to suicide gank, when you can use even a coercer with few SP and alpha a hulk you know something is wrong lol sure they don't fit them great but... that is just crazy.
still I support this, it might force CCP to make mining fun and worthwhile to get miners to mine again after this entertaining abuse, because the ISK is crap as is the "experience". |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 07:15:00 -
[223] - Quote
knulla wrote:it is way easy to suicide gank, when you can use even a coercer with few SP and alpha a hulk you know something is wrong lol sure they don't fit them great but... that is just crazy.
You'd need quite a few coercers to pull that off. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1005
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 07:33:00 -
[224] - Quote
Ares Renton wrote:This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future. Posting to confirm goons are the only alliance in null sec and that CCP literally just throw ISK at them. I personally saw Hilmar slipping at least three fitty dollar notes into mittens' thong last night.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
77
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 09:35:00 -
[225] - Quote
We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion. |

Khadann
First Legion
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 09:53:00 -
[226] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion.
WTF? |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1007
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 10:16:00 -
[227] - Quote
Khadann wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion. WTF? This is actually true, any goonswarm owned null sec station refines at many times the output of a standard station model.
Some in the past have called this unfair, personally I am of the opinion that since they as an alliance have little in the way of mining operations it is a necessary evil. And good on CCP for being kind enough to introduce such a mechanic to support their goon overlords valued customers.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 10:58:00 -
[228] - Quote
Khadann wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion. WTF? Problem? |

Phugoid
BHEI Galactic Construction
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 12:28:00 -
[229] - Quote
I think the OP, James 315 is trying his best to become the next The Mittani. Someone needs alot of attention.
I have mined some during Hulkageddon, tho of course with a Covetor and not as frequent as before. But all will go back to normal after Hulkageddon. And I do, do other things in Eve while Hulkageddon is going on.......
I find it very interesting that with all that there is to do in Eve, the OP can only find satisfaction in ganking miners. Meh, we will continue to play the game as we want, regardless of any lame "Manisfesto" by someone needing attention! -áObergruppenfuhrer |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 13:57:00 -
[230] - Quote
Plentath wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome. Yay, sure the 350 people CCP has hired since then will think exaclty the same about CCP losing the income that justifies their paychecks... But, according to your kind, CCP ought to make the game more like the themepark MMOs that are losing subscribers? Okay. Not my kind, I'm not asking for that. It just doesn't make sense to me to wish that "every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears." Ans no I don't mine, I hate it... |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 13:59:00 -
[231] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Ares Renton wrote:This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future. Posting to confirm goons are the only alliance in null sec and that CCP literally just throw ISK at them. I personally saw Hilmar slipping at least three fitty dollar notes into mittens' thong last night. OUTRAGEOUS !!!
It was my thong... |

Immogen Telvani
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 14:04:00 -
[232] - Quote
James 315 wrote: In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone!
- 315
Just pointing out that you've missed 2 groups off your list ..
#1] Hi-Sec mission runners. #2] Nul-sec Corps/Alliances that NAP every/any-thing/one around them.
I eagerly await the results of your forth comming war on NulSec/Mission Hubs. |

Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 22:13:00 -
[233] - Quote
James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. Yet the industrialists got roped in big time and way over built hulks believing in goomswarms mission. They saw profits in hulks. Turns out the bottom fell out of the market as the attack was not effective in doing anything other than upsetting morale of the carebears.
Mineral prices are back down that has several orders of magnitude more effect on miners than hulkageddon does.
James 315 is trivial. Goonswarm is slightly less trivial but still ineffective in their mission. Eve lives on.
|

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1703
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 22:21:00 -
[234] - Quote
Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half.
Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts.  |

Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 22:31:00 -
[235] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half. Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts. 
Simple morale failure of those miners they will be back if they have not already. And hulks are so cheap now people are getting into mining that never did it before. Even goonswarmes are training for mining. See posts on page 5 or 6.
But none of this changes the fact that you (James 315) are ineffective in stopping mining even in one belt. |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 23:59:00 -
[236] - Quote
TBH, the battle between ganking and mining doesn't have anything to do with how tough (or lack of toughness) Hulks are. No matter how tough you make your Hulk, there will be people who will want to gank you. Let's face it, a top notch destroyer costs about 15 mil to purchase and outfit. An entire squad could dedicate themselves to wiping out a hulk and still come out ahead.
And it isn't about if ganking is 'proper' pvp. It's really about in gameplay mechanics.
Basically, the activity of mining is designed to make miners sitting ducks. Fat, immobile, sitting ducks. We can't mine unless we're rooted to one spot, with nothing to protect us. Heck, with default warp points in the system menu, it's like Eve is designed to make it easier for people to gank miners.
This is completely unlike something like PvE, where most missions occur in deadspace areas where you have to at least enter through a gate, or PvP, where you must use your own (or your friends) cunning to get kills.
I agree that once caught, miners should be easy kills. After all, they're industrial vessels, and even the strongest civilian ship pales in resilience to many military craft. But it should be harder to catch us than *warp to belt...kill...move on*. |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.19 01:53:00 -
[237] - Quote
The OP isn't wrong, to a point (admittedly I haven't read his whole manifesto, there's only so much wall o'text I can plow through in one sitting), but he misses on a few crucial points.
First, he blames the extinction of the nullsec miner on imbalance of the risk vs reward calculation as applied between High Sec mining and 0.0 mining. This calculation is made up of two variables: risk and reward. He focuses solely on reward and blames the high sec miner for unbalancing the equation. Except that HS miners don't control the reward aspect. The market does. In fact, by moving to High Sec, the miners reduced the reward of high sec mining by increasing the supply of High Sec minerals.
Second, he completely glosses over the risk factor. In fact he covers the topic nostalgically, like a conservative wishing for the heyday of the Regan years (or even worse, the '50s). The risk of null sec grew until the nullsec miner was driven out. The reward shrank, the risk grew. You can't blame the prey for moving away from the killing fields, especially if it's not worth their while to stay.
So what does all this mean?
First of all, in order to fix the issues he raises, one of two things need to be done (preferably both). Risk needs to be reduced. Now since CCP can't change the price of Hulks and make them cheaper, they the need to be harder to lose, and thus more miners would be willing to put them at risk.
Second, the reward needs to be increased. Due to the composition of the NS available ores, their value is less than or equal to the value of HS ores. CCP could do this by redistributing mineral compositions in NS and HS space and, if necessary, change the type of ores available in NS belts.
It's easy to blame miners for these problems. It's kind of like blaming Canada. It's easy, but hardly appropriate. Miners only go where the money is. Make NS mining more profitable, and they will come. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1017
|
Posted - 2012.05.19 02:53:00 -
[238] - Quote
Ditra Vorthran wrote:TBH, the battle between ganking and mining doesn't have anything to do with how tough (or lack of toughness) Hulks are. No matter how tough you make your Hulk, there will be people who will want to gank you. Let's face it, a top notch destroyer costs about 15 mil to purchase and outfit. An entire squad could dedicate themselves to wiping out a hulk and still come out ahead.
And it isn't about if ganking is 'proper' pvp. It's really about in gameplay mechanics.
Basically, the activity of mining is designed to make miners sitting ducks. Fat, immobile, sitting ducks. We can't mine unless we're rooted to one spot, with nothing to protect us. Heck, with default warp points in the system menu, it's like Eve is designed to make it easier for people to gank miners.
This is completely unlike something like PvE, where most missions occur in deadspace areas where you have to at least enter through a gate, or PvP, where you must use your own (or your friends) cunning to get kills.
I agree that once caught, miners should be easy kills. After all, they're industrial vessels, and even the strongest civilian ship pales in resilience to many military craft. But it should be harder to catch us than *warp to belt...kill...move on*. You know why people generally gank hulks and not those 20k EHP mission tengus? Its because mission runners, whilst doing an incredibly boring repetive task, generally don't go AFK. A tengu is worth far more than double the price of a hulk, they can be found everywhere and they already have rats shooting them if you gank them in a mission.
People don't bother because mission runners would just warp off. I think miners could learn from that, this staying at your keyboard strategy sounds like a winner.
Alternatively you could, you know, take those hulks out to low sec and null sec where they belong. Let the genuine new players in coveters and mining frigates mine veldspar without a massive pile of risk averse hulk pilots driving prices down for them.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Cunanium
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 03:18:00 -
[239] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half. Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts. 
High sec mining dropped by half? No way. Man you must have killed half the hulks in existence. And those efforts by CCP to ban RMT bots have not been effective at all, even though they have made at least 3 devblogs about their new efforts to root out a source of money they could be ra... I mean receiving in exchange for game time.
Here's some more numbers, 2 months ago CCP banned 150 accounts in one swoop of the ban bat, then in the following 2 days banned another 450ish accounts. These were reported to drive up awareness and make the EVE community aware of a new focus, that of continual banning instead of quarterly banning based on economic data dumps from the game's database. The last estimate I heard was over 30 trillion in isk and assets was removed from game. You are TOTALLY right, this had ZERO effect and your killing of 4000 hulks totally reduced the number of active mining accounts by half.
Just to throw out some numbers, it is typically considered insignificant if the error bound is less than 10% of the measured value. Hulkageddon accounts for 4000ish kills, CCP banned 500 *ACCOUNTS*, so assuming that those 4000 kills resulted in those individuals nerd rage quitting and leaving mining altogether, your efforts are still affected by CCP ban-bat in a significant way.
Mineral prices as a whole have spiked, not just high sec ores, your efforts are focused on high sec miners. How can you effect low/null sec ores and minerals by attacking high sec? The logic is non existent, if anything their prices would drop in percentages not equal to other mineral prices since the restricting factor on ship manufacture will be high sec ores leaving an abundance of low/null sec. However, this is not the case. Null sec ore/mineral price spiked with the high sec ore/mineral prices, suggesting a disconnect between efforts against high sec and the market forces.
Your hypothesis doesn't account for the drop in market prices, however, market prospecting does. Individuals have purchased up significant amounts of minerals to hedge losses from changes in the patch and to gain advantage as the mineral markets are expected to settle at a higher mark with the significant reduction in mining by gun. The purchase of minerals produced a market bubble which was used by some to quantify their efforts at hurting mining, yet the total volume of minerals on market is significantly larger than the volume of minerals produced in the game per month.
Heres the truth of the matter. There exists more in stock piles and reserves of rich players/corps/alliances than can be produced in any short term, ie months. This produces significant lag in the system. The rise/drop in prices is more closely linked to market prospecting by very wealthy individuals about the up coming patch (ie change of looting system...)
Go ahead and continue to believe that your efforts are making more than a drop in the bucket, and I will continue to observe purchases of minerals in the billions from high sec mining corps. |

Redbraids Crafterson
RaVal Thyokill Industies Inc. Intrepid Crossing
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 04:09:00 -
[240] - Quote
Cunanium wrote:James 315 wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half. Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts.  High sec mining dropped by half? No way. Man you must have killed half the hulks in existence. And those efforts by CCP to ban RMT bots have not been effective at all, even though they have made at least 3 devblogs about their new efforts to root out a source of money they could be ra... I mean receiving in exchange for game time. Here's some more numbers, 2 months ago CCP banned 150 accounts in one swoop of the ban bat, then in the following 2 days banned another 450ish accounts. These were reported to drive up awareness and make the EVE community aware of a new focus, that of continual banning instead of quarterly banning based on economic data dumps from the game's database. The last estimate I heard was over 30 trillion in isk and assets was removed from game. You are TOTALLY right, this had ZERO effect and your killing of 4000 hulks totally reduced the number of active mining accounts by half. Just to throw out some numbers, it is typically considered insignificant if the error bound is less than 10% of the measured value. Hulkageddon accounts for 4000ish kills, CCP banned 500 *ACCOUNTS*, so assuming that those 4000 kills resulted in those individuals nerd rage quitting and leaving mining altogether, your efforts are still affected by CCP ban-bat in a significant way. Mineral prices as a whole have spiked, not just high sec ores, your efforts are focused on high sec miners. How can you effect low/null sec ores and minerals by attacking high sec? The logic is non existent, if anything their prices would drop in percentages not equal to other mineral prices since the restricting factor on ship manufacture will be high sec ores leaving an abundance of low/null sec. However, this is not the case. Null sec ore/mineral price spiked with the high sec ore/mineral prices, suggesting a disconnect between efforts against high sec and the market forces. Your hypothesis doesn't account for the drop in market prices, however, market prospecting does. Individuals have purchased up significant amounts of minerals to hedge losses from changes in the patch and to gain advantage as the mineral markets are expected to settle at a higher mark with the significant reduction in mining by gun. The purchase of minerals produced a market bubble which was used by some to quantify their efforts at hurting mining, yet the total volume of minerals on market is significantly larger than the volume of minerals produced in the game per month. Heres the truth of the matter. There exists more in stock piles and reserves of rich players/corps/alliances than can be produced in any short term, ie months. This produces significant lag in the system. The rise/drop in prices is more closely linked to market prospecting by very wealthy individuals about the up coming patch (ie change of looting system...) Go ahead and continue to believe that your efforts are making more than a drop in the bucket, and I will continue to observe purchases of minerals in the billions from high sec mining corps.
I am curious if we could find the numbers of actual minerals moved through the game via trade and compare it to the amount of minerals mined during the same time span. It might be an interesting number with all this talk of markets. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |