Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

James 315
paperclip mansion
1635
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here.
If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong.
Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead.
I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak.
What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there.
The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line:
The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.
Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there!
Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP.
As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears.
In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone!
- 315
|

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
555
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
inb4 the same people who think pvp is the entire game complains that a cruiser costs as much as a plex. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
396
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm not saying it was just bots, but your argument as to why it wasn't is farcical. |

AureoBroker
Natural Inventions
40
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
Now, not for anything, but... A mackinaw WOULD warp out if locked. Locking makes a very annoying sound, it's hard to miss. Warping in doesn't.
Hardly applies to same-name things and warping one by one from a single pack, but still. |

Mathias Hex
131
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
I came here expecting 10+ pages of literature, have to admit I still only read the first sentence. I recall one night in a nightclub called the matrix, there I was... Mother of god there I am! Holy f**k. |

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
358
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:52:00 -
[6] - Quote
James 315 wrote:As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP.
Yes, their huge sway over CCP to never touch the actual mechanics of mining over 9 years. Adjusting lame highsec drops that added way too much low materials in reprocessing Adjusting lame drone area that made no sense in how minerals should be added to game... without adjusting the mechanics of mining to make it slightly interesting in compensation.
Expecting us to wait for future mechanics still on paper. Miners need to free CCP right? |

Karn Dulake
Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance
675
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
I once sat next to a miner in my tengu and it warped out. When i told him that i was not going to gank him in my ship he said that he could not be sure.
Which adds evidence that miners have the least knowledge about this game than any other profession. I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion. |

Nephilius
Knights of Athena Star Council
416
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
And when the wolves destabilize their food chain by eating all the prey, then what? "If." |

Dreadknoght Lomaree
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 01:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
You are an idiot if you think that mineral inputs droppng 50% is a good thing...
Where do you think that every ship in eve came from? Every ship that dies in hulkaggedon, the miner & the ganker, costs minerals to build. Now, miners in high-sec bring in the largest total of minerals in eve, and you think this is a good thing? You think miners will want to go into low-sec or 0.0 when all of this is going on?
Yeah, lets see you in a few weeks when ships begin to increase in price 10-fold (which means tens of millions of isk for a single frigate!)
And im not even talking about the destroyed modules prices...
|

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
359
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:I once sat next to a miner in my tengu and it warped out. When i told him that i was not going to gank him in my ship he said that he could not be sure.
Which adds evidence that miners have the least knowledge about this game than any other profession.
And you couldn't possibly be a warp in point? |
|

Torneach
Emrys Enterprises
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
I too enjoy thinking of the prospect of paying over 100 million ISK for a tier 1 battleship.
In fact, it makes me positively giddy.
 |

Gahagan
White Moon Aeronautics Lawful Insanity
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
I'm confused about the point. Is there a reason for wanting to remove mining from highsec, or is this just a "let's see if we can" kind of thing? |

Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
421
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
I hope this is true. For no other reason that it would be wonderful to experience an adventurous change in the market even if for a short while. Let us see what industry is made of. Ferox #1 |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
83
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
These are great days we're living, bros. We are jolly green goons, walking New Eden with guns. These people we wasted here today are the finest miners we will ever know. After we rotate back to Deklein, we're gonna miss not having anyone around that's worth shooting. . |

Torneach
Emrys Enterprises
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kietay Ayari wrote:I hope this is true. For no other reason that it would be wonderful to experience an adventurous change in the market even if for a short while. Let us see what industry is made of.
Just gotta hope the pyramid doesn't collapse with a part of its base missing.
|

Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
James 315 wrote:
The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line:
75% of all statistics are made up, including this one, and yours. You have no idea of the make-up of bot miners to actual miners, you likely don't even have something that could be considered a ballpark figure. So your conclusion that it is a "hefty amount" is just a hefty amount of fecal matter.
James 315 wrote:Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP.
Fascinating, you have the ability to read the minds of every miner out there AND predict the future. You sir are indeed a GOD. Oh wait, no you aren't.
James 315 wrote:As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears.
Whilst it is commendable that miners are trying ganking, your appear to have missed one vital thing. If no-one is mining, and the bots are all banned, then how do you expect to pay for your ships in a years time when a cruiser costs 600mil? Or when you have to go out mining to build it....oh wait, you can't do that because you will just get blown up.
James 315 wrote:In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone!
- 315
Your ramblings are reminiscent of various leaders throughout history who, for one reason or another, decided that their whimsical fantasies and delusional rhetoric actually meant anything. I wonder what happened to them........? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4237
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
look at all the miners thinking that there isn't a huge amount of stockpiled minerals "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Torneach
Emrys Enterprises
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
Andski wrote:look at all the miners thinking that there isn't a huge amount of stockpiled minerals
Yeah, cause stockpiles are automatically self-replenishing. 
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4237
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
Torneach wrote:Andski wrote:look at all the miners thinking that there isn't a huge amount of stockpiled minerals Yeah, cause stockpiles are automatically self-replenishing. 
please continue to overestimate your value to the health of the economy "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Pres Crendraven
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Man its taking a huge bite out of the Tech demand since Hulk demand went through the floor too. What 2n'd to tech usage. Jump freighters? THey really need to come down anyhow. I think you guys are doing to Goons what the Goons did to Jita, Really burning down the house.
Talking Heads Meta34me
Corp and Alliance details hidden to protect the innocent. |
|

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
190
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dreadknoght Lomaree wrote:Where do you think that every ship in eve came from? Every ship that dies in hulkaggedon, the miner & the ganker, costs minerals to build. Now, miners in high-sec bring in the largest total of minerals in eve, and you think this is a good thing? You think miners will want to go into low-sec or 0.0 when all of this is going on? They must have a killer EVE economics class in the Uni. +1 in local |

Ian Mcmantry
Paraxiuum Limited
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:33:00 -
[22] - Quote
I don't get why you are so intent on eliminating hi sec mining? Bots.. yeah, it's the easy way out. But shooting miners in high sec is a challenge? It rather reminds me of fishing with TNT... no sport, only thrill is not getting caught by the cops... but then even if you do in eve all they do is pop your cheap ship and take away your means to celebrate your birthday in a 1.0 systems. On the other side.. its not like there isn't mining in lowsec. And, If you mine in high sec like they do in low sec... you may still die.. but at least you have a chance. |

MadMuppet
Kerguelen Station
317
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 02:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
It is still too soon to tell anything. If it rained for three days in a row I swear half the forum whiners on here would be building an ark and begin collecting two of every creature that lives with them in their parent's basement. If it didn't rain for three days they would be screaming global warming, demand a larger tank to store water, and die of dehydration from all the tears they shed.
They are the goldfish of Eve, swimming around New Eden bumping in to mirrors and screaming at themselves for being in the way because their short term memory is about thirty seconds. Like little yapping boot polishing toy-breed dogs they serve little purpose but to make noise, **** the carpets, and on an extremely rare occasion manage to disrupt or kill a much larger dog by getting caught in its throat.
You need to give it time. The Eve economy is a process, not a single act. You need to understand that every change needs time to gestate before coming to fruition. One human can make one baby in nine months. The forum whiners believe that if nine people work together (the Goons) they can make the baby happen in one month. The actual long term effects will still take nine months. Those same nine months you can make a baby of your own, but you want it in two weeks. Unless your last name is Jolie, it probably isn't going to magically appear. The UI is getting better (on SiSi), but please, jump on and try the new inventory system. Let's try to avoid another 'Incaran/Door' issue. The Unified Inventory is going to potentially anger a lot of players, go try it and see what you think of it. May 22nd is just around the corner! |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
429
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 03:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
Most excellent.
I hear all these bears claiming how much the pvpers will cry when T1 cruisers cost 600 million, and it makes me wonder if these people skipped grade school to mine space rocks. Are they really that daft to think that if the rewards of high-sec mining overshadow the rewards of activities like running wormhole and null-sec anomalies, no one will jump at the opportunity to grab that money? Do people not have even the most basic understanding of supply and demand?
I can only hope that mining becomes so profitable, though chances are it won't. Do you think that I wouldn't hit the belts myself if two cycles of Veldspar pay for a PLEX? And don't tell me that I'm going to immediately get ganked; I've been exclusively killing people for eight years. It's not going to happen, because I'm not a failure who doesn't understand basic game mechanics, fitting principles, and combat tactics.
I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. |

Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
108
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 03:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
Andski wrote:Torneach wrote:Andski wrote:look at all the miners thinking that there isn't a huge amount of stockpiled minerals Yeah, cause stockpiles are automatically self-replenishing.  please continue to overestimate your value to the health of the economy
The goons have this quite peculiar notion that they are immune from their own disease. They are not, and they will discover this before long. I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

Malphilos
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 03:14:00 -
[26] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec.
And since that time I've noticed a marked and shameful decrease in both the quantity and quality of your insanity. This is shoddy work, really second rate.
Please return to huffing paint or whatever other method you use to court your muse. Unless you can pick things up, we're going to have to let you go. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
728
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 03:17:00 -
[27] - Quote
For some reason, this makes me want to go back to mining... |

Ian Mcmantry
Paraxiuum Limited
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 04:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:I once sat next to a miner in my tengu and it warped out. When i told him that i was not going to gank him in my ship he said that he could not be sure.
Which adds evidence that miners have the least knowledge about this game than any other profession.
Or.. someone said that before in a pretty ship and did it anyway,and they were afraid... I have seen it... and i laughed at both of them. |

hank boar
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 04:40:00 -
[29] - Quote
You asked for it this is war

|

Miss Whippy
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
234
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 04:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
Only HALF!?
That's not nearly good enough, ice still flowing freely in Hek. That means all the ice systems around it are in dire need of some Hulkageddoning
Burn them! BURN THEM ALL! UI Iteration isn't enough, we need to start from scratch |
|

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1097
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 04:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Zerg rush in 3...2...1.... |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
438
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 04:54:00 -
[32] - Quote
Shorter than I expected but still a good read. The sad part of all this is that the bots are increasing their profits if they can avoid being ganked. |

Daneirkus Auralex
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 04:58:00 -
[33] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:If no-one is mining, and the bots are all banned, then how do you expect to pay for your ships in a years time when a cruiser costs 600mil? Or when you have to go out mining to build it....oh wait, you can't do that because you will just get blown up.
I'm pretty sure I'd be able to mine happily in the comfort of Fountain, surrounded by our many allies and friends, with 4 friendly fleets patrolling the region and scores of soothing logistics ships and healing capital ships around. That is, if I should ever choose to do such a thing.
Edit: sorry :-( |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
176
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:12:00 -
[34] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:I once sat next to a miner in my tengu and it warped out. When i told him that i was not going to gank him in my ship he said that he could not be sure.
Which adds evidence that miners have the least knowledge about this game than any other profession.
No, it would suggest you have no experience as a Miner. He wasn't expecting you to lock him with your Tengu, he was expecting your 3 mill Desi alt to warp to you so it could lock him at Optimal, leaving him no chance to align and get to 75%.
Gratz on winning the "war". of course now all you null, whine bears can do what you say you hate. Mine your own ******* minerals. Have fun.
- I run level 3 missions in Drakes and Damnations and I have enough of both to keep me occupied for the next 20 years. I don't care how much they cost anymore. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1357
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:17:00 -
[35] - Quote
James 315 wrote:As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking.
No, more and more pilots are getting hooked on the sucker payments handed out by Goonswarm. 100M ISK for every 10 Hulks blown up. Don't make the mistake of assuming that these pilots would be out there blowing Hulks up if there weren't significant rewards on offer. They weren't blowing up miners before Hulkageddon, they won't be blowing up miners after Hulkageddon.
100M ISK for blowing up 10 Hulks is a pretty decent motivator, wouldn't you agree?
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
429
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:20:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ocih wrote:- I run level 3 missions in Drakes and Damnations and I have enough of both to keep me occupied for the next 20 years. I don't care how much they cost anymore. It's okay, it will take you much less than 20 years to quit out of boredom. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
429
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:James 315 wrote:As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. No, more and more pilots are getting hooked on the sucker payments handed out by Goonswarm. 100M ISK for every 10 Hulks blown up. Don't make the mistake of assuming that these pilots would be out there blowing Hulks up if there weren't significant rewards on offer. They weren't blowing up miners before Hulkageddon, they won't be blowing up miners after Hulkageddon. 100M ISK for blowing up 10 Hulks is a pretty decent motivator, wouldn't you agree? That barely covers the cost of the gear used to gank them, and when you consider sec status lost (unless you use dedicated gank alts, in which case you're not really after the money anyway), you don't even break even. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
176
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Ocih wrote:- I run level 3 missions in Drakes and Damnations and I have enough of both to keep me occupied for the next 20 years. I don't care how much they cost anymore. It's okay, it will take you much less than 20 years to quit out of boredom.
6 years and counting. When it comes to the waiting games and siege warfare by douchebags, I'm better at this than you. Count on it. |

Daneirkus Auralex
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
91
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ocih wrote:[quote=Karn Dulake] Gratz on winning the "war". of course now all you null, whine bears can do what you say you hate. Mine your own ******* minerals. Have fun. I'd just like to add that if a large, null-sec alliance REALLY needed minerals, and it was impossible to procure them through normal means, its leadership would probably coordinate with allies, schedule a fleet, send some pings, and lo and behold, next thing you know there would be a multifaceted operation with 100 exhumers, 30 logistics, 15 orcas, 10 rorquals and a couple titans to bridge everyone around, plus 200 armor hacs w/ support on patrol spewing bubbles everywhere to protect the fleet, plus 25 carriers and 15 supercarriers on standby within jump range, a wing of stealth bombers patrolling the region, and rifterswarms guarding all the gates. And the entire constellation would probably be clear of ore within a few hours.
Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
430
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Ocih wrote:- I run level 3 missions in Drakes and Damnations and I have enough of both to keep me occupied for the next 20 years. I don't care how much they cost anymore. It's okay, it will take you much less than 20 years to quit out of boredom. 6 years and counting. When it comes to the waiting games and siege warfare by douchebags, I'm better at this than you. Count on it. I always believe what people tell me on the internet, without question. |
|

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
176
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:38:00 -
[41] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Ocih wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Ocih wrote:- I run level 3 missions in Drakes and Damnations and I have enough of both to keep me occupied for the next 20 years. I don't care how much they cost anymore. It's okay, it will take you much less than 20 years to quit out of boredom. 6 years and counting. When it comes to the waiting games and siege warfare by douchebags, I'm better at this than you. Count on it. I always believe what people tell me on the internet, without question.
Ioci - 2005
But I suppose if you must, you can convince yourself I bought the Character or some dreamy gibberish. Whatever floats your boat. |

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:47:00 -
[42] - Quote
I guess it is true. Mommy or Daddy will spend real money for you to buy a few plexes to keep up in your ship race since you and many others have ganked poor defenseless ships in empire to prove you have no *****. And scaring off many other miners is a simple reason. they know its hulkageddon season. why mine and lose their fancy hulk or mackinaw.
I am soooo scared of your weak PVP skills. Come on and be a man and wardec folks or go lowsec or 0.0 for your pvp. have you gotten about the 0.0 carebear land? oh yeah you have |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:50:00 -
[43] - Quote
I know a Goon who is training for a hulk as we speak, so I doubt that us miners stomping out in protest will faze them one bit.
EDIT: Also 1 trillion per month in Tech income alone, so I doubt that they would care about the price of ships anyway. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
430
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 05:56:00 -
[44] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:I am soooo scared of your weak PVP skills. Come on and be a man and wardec folks or go lowsec or 0.0 for your pvp. have you gotten about the 0.0 carebear land? oh yeah you have We gank Hulks, you whine about ganking. We declare wars, you whine about war declarations. We go to 0.0, you whine about covert cloaks and your titan fleets not being able to one-shot single-digit roaming gangs.
It doesn't matter what the actual players do; the carebears will always whine about it. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
675
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 06:12:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:I know a Goon who is training for a hulk as we speak, so I doubt that us miners stomping out in protest will faze them one bit.
EDIT: Also 1 trillion per month in Tech income alone, so I doubt that they would care about the price of ships anyway. We're not going to come and whine when some cloaky loki pops our Hulk in nullsec and runs away though... it's an accepted risk if you do stuff like that. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
675
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 06:16:00 -
[46] - Quote
Daneirkus Auralex wrote:Ocih wrote:[quote=Karn Dulake] Gratz on winning the "war". of course now all you null, whine bears can do what you say you hate. Mine your own ******* minerals. Have fun. I'd just like to add that if a large, null-sec alliance REALLY needed minerals, and it was impossible to procure them through normal means, its leadership would probably coordinate with allies, schedule a fleet, send some pings, and lo and behold, next thing you know there would be a multifaceted operation with 100 exhumers, 30 logistics, 15 orcas, 10 rorquals and a couple titans to bridge everyone around, plus 200 armor hacs w/ support on patrol spewing bubbles everywhere to protect the fleet, plus 25 carriers and 15 supercarriers on standby within jump range, a wing of stealth bombers patrolling the region, and rifterswarms guarding all the gates. And the entire constellation would probably be clear of ore within a few hours. Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game. TEST mining op, please ignore !
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Mirajane Cromwell
59
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 06:53:00 -
[47] - Quote
Quote:Mining numbers! Average mined per day for the 7 days before escalation: High (2.7bn m3), Low (9.3m m3), Null (696m m3), WH (97.7m m3). source
Quote:Average mined per day for the last 7 days: High (1.47bn m3), Low (13.8m m3), Null (796m m3), WH (112m m3). source
So more nullsec and WH players are starting to mine... not by much at the moment but I hope we get to see the numbers again at the end of the month.  |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
676
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 06:57:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mirajane Cromwell wrote:Quote:Mining numbers! Average mined per day for the 7 days before escalation: High (2.7bn m3), Low (9.3m m3), Null (696m m3), WH (97.7m m3). sourceQuote:Average mined per day for the last 7 days: High (1.47bn m3), Low (13.8m m3), Null (796m m3), WH (112m m3). sourceSo more nullsec and WH players are starting to mine... not by much at the moment but I hope we get to see the numbers again at the end of the month.  You might have to give it a month (T1 hulk from scratch) or two (T2 hulk from scratch). Please don't worry too much though, dear highsec miners, we don't produce so many lowend minerals, so you can still sell them at higher prices if your buddies stop ~~ Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
313
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:03:00 -
[49] - Quote
And ore prices are rising and ore in short supply?
So much for the miners argument that we need them and we would have no ore if they quit :)
|

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
580
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:03:00 -
[50] - Quote
Meanwhile in New Eden...
- mineral prices are going down, probably as people is rolling out huge stockpiles - Hulks are out of demand and slowly going down - Modulated Deep Core Miner II are almost unfindable and their price skyrocketed - And I still haven't seen a single Hulk blown in my system (they're not undocking, apparently -see item 1)
The things are so quiet at hisec belts that I've stumbled upon "commander" rats twice already. EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 15% Nullsec; 72% Highsec. CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |
|

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:06:00 -
[51] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. so what you really want to say is that CCP Diagoras manufactures data for his goon friends to prevent mineral prices from dropping further? (it's well known that most goons went long on high-ends before Inferno) |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1358
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:15:00 -
[52] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:That barely covers the cost of the gear used to gank them, and when you consider sec status lost (unless you use dedicated gank alts, in which case you're not really after the money anyway), you don't even break even.
Please show me this 10M ISK catalyst fit.
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1358
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
Miilla wrote:And ore prices are rising and ore in short supply?
Note that mineral prices are still coming down from the pre-buildup speculation fuelled by drone poo rumours. Combine that with a lot of people offloading their stockpiles (which is pushing the prices down), and I expect Hulkageddon could continue running for another month before we hit the bottleneck of miners actually mining stuff to produce minerals.
How many industrialists don't have a month or two supply of the things they need to maintain production?
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1358
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:We're not going to come and whine when some cloaky loki pops our Hulk in nullsec and runs away though... it's an accepted risk if you do stuff like that.
No, the perpetual "AFK cloaker" whines in F&I couldn't possibly be from null sec residents at all.
|

Sigurd Sig Hansen
Hedion University Amarr Empire
149
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:19:00 -
[55] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong. Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead. I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there. The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears. In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone! - 315
Imo, all the miners in the game should take two months off ans see if anyone notices. wonder how many accounts that would be lost
See what they do not what they say after all
Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game |

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
313
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:23:00 -
[56] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Miilla wrote:And ore prices are rising and ore in short supply? Note that mineral prices are still coming down from the pre-buildup speculation fuelled by drone poo rumours. Combine that with a lot of people offloading their stockpiles (which is pushing the prices down), and I expect Hulkageddon could continue running for another month before we hit the bottleneck of miners actually mining stuff to produce minerals. How many industrialists don't have a month or two supply of the things they need to maintain production?
I get all more ore from reprocessing drops. I don't depend on miners :) |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1358
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:23:00 -
[57] - Quote
James 315 wrote:The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.
Do you mean "quit mining" the same way my nicotine-addicted friend has "quit smoking" several times over the past year?
I'm pretty sure you'll find that human miners will take to the belts again very quickly after the unofficial end of Hulkageddon (which will be a few days after the official end, since many participants are the mouth-breathing types who need to be told things by word of mouth since they can't actually read).
Heck, once word gets out that Goonswarm is no longer honouring the bounty offer, Hulkageddon will be over very quickly indeed.
|

Styx Cyc
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:25:00 -
[58] - Quote
I've seen plenty of barges and hulks where I usually roam and the ships destroyed in a 24 hour period are at their usual year-round levels for all the nearby systems.
Also, the price of things have actually dropped in the past couple of weeks. So, I'm guessing someone, somewhere its making crap up.
That, or I live in a little paradise without too many mouthbreathers lol. Either way, its fine by me |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
430
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 07:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:That barely covers the cost of the gear used to gank them, and when you consider sec status lost (unless you use dedicated gank alts, in which case you're not really after the money anyway), you don't even break even. Please show me this 10M ISK catalyst fit. Catalyst: 1.4m Light Neutron Blaster II: 1.3m*8=10.4m Gunnery Mods: 3 million Everything Else: ~ a few hundred thousand
Total Value: 15 million Surviving Mods: 6.8 million, assuming 50% survival rate for modules Sunk Cost: 8.2 million per Catalyst |

Romar Agent
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:45:00 -
[60] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF! We are at war?
Anyhow, a guy with that much time on his hands would be useful to any organization.
Please inquire for a job at Kor-Azor Prime, Moon Griklaeum, Ishukone Corporation Factory, we still need someone to count our minerals (doing something useful for a achange).
James 315 wrote:... The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining. ... We would hope so, the less unwanted competitors the better. We can already feel the higher minerals prices in our wallet. Though I still see to many competitors where we operate.
James 315 wrote:... In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. ... I'm waiting...
... still ...
... perhaps some of those fabled Hulkageddon gankers would care to show up one day? |
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1361
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:46:00 -
[61] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Catalyst: 1.4m Light Neutron Blaster II: 1.3m*8=10.4m Gunnery Mods: 3 million Everything Else: ~ a few hundred thousand
Total Value: 15 million Surviving Mods: 6.8 million, assuming 50% survival rate for modules Sunk Cost: 8.2 million per Catalyst

You're doing it wrong. Switching from T2 to T1 means you can use 2 catalysts for this job, and afford an Orca full of Catalysts for the same price as those guns of yours.
Now factor in the salvage and loot from the Hulk or Mackinaw you just killed.
It's really not that hard to do it right.
|

Romar Agent
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:57:00 -
[62] - Quote
Romar Agent wrote:James 315 wrote:Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF! We are at war? Anyhow, a guy with that much time on his hands would be useful to any organization. Please inquire for a job at Kor-Azor Prime, Moon Griklaeum, Ishukone Corporation Factory, we still need someone to count our minerals (doing something useful for a achange). James 315 wrote:... The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining. ... We would hope so, the less unwanted competitors the better. We can already feel the higher minerals prices in our wallet. Though I still see to many competitors where we operate. James 315 wrote:... In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. ... I'm waiting... ... still ... ... perhaps some of those fabled Hulkageddon gankers would care to show up one day?
|

R0me0 Charl1e
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 08:58:00 -
[63] - Quote
I can see only good things from these events. This is making EVE a healthier place to live in. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
430
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 09:06:00 -
[64] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Catalyst: 1.4m Light Neutron Blaster II: 1.3m*8=10.4m Gunnery Mods: 3 million Everything Else: ~ a few hundred thousand
Total Value: 15 million Surviving Mods: 6.8 million, assuming 50% survival rate for modules Sunk Cost: 8.2 million per Catalyst  You're doing it wrong. Switching from T2 to T1 means you can use 2 catalysts for this job, and afford an Orca full of Catalysts for the same price as those guns of yours. Now factor in the salvage and loot from the Hulk or Mackinaw you just killed. It's really not that hard to do it right. Do you gank Hulks? |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
936
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 09:08:00 -
[65] - Quote
I enjoy not logging in, but watching my wallet keep going higher. Nothing like buying a bunch of stuff, putting them up on market marked up dramatically and waiting for this to happen.
People were saying I was crazy and no way my wares would sell. Now they are flying off the shelves. Thank you Hulkaggedon participants for making me more rich.
/tips hat
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

DF3CT
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 09:09:00 -
[66] - Quote
Not sure if serious....or self trolling....
|

Whitehound
272
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 09:13:00 -
[67] - Quote
Help me, I am looking for the thread with the people who do not care. I cannot find it.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Tobias Sjodin
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
142
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 09:53:00 -
[68] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Catalyst: 1.4m Light Neutron Blaster II: 1.3m*8=10.4m Gunnery Mods: 3 million Everything Else: ~ a few hundred thousand
Total Value: 15 million Surviving Mods: 6.8 million, assuming 50% survival rate for modules Sunk Cost: 8.2 million per Catalyst  You're doing it wrong. Switching from T2 to T1 means you can use 2 catalysts for this job, and afford an Orca full of Catalysts for the same price as those guns of yours. Now factor in the salvage and loot from the Hulk or Mackinaw you just killed. It's really not that hard to do it right.
Yes, and another account is free of charge, right? Not to mention the time inefficiency and increased risk factor of using multiple accounts.
Ronald Reagan: I do not like Sweden, they support communism. Minister: Sir, but Sweden are anti-communist, Sir.-á Ronald Reagan: I do not care what kind of communists they are. |

Perramas
Pan Caldarian Ventures
179
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 11:20:00 -
[69] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:I once sat next to a miner in my tengu and it warped out. When i told him that i was not going to gank him in my ship he said that he could not be sure.
Which adds evidence that miners have the least knowledge about this game than any other profession.
Or the miner was smart enough to know you could warp in a gang of cheap throw away ships right on top of him to blow him up.
|

Grishken
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 11:24:00 -
[70] - Quote
Maybe its me but I haven't noticed anything different in my mining operations. Except maybe that I am making more money with the price increases. |
|

Testerxnot Sheepherder
Treasures Collectors Solar Citizens
280
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 11:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
Less miners is indeed healthy for EVE.
OP however, is like an annoying parasitic ******* bacteria, i.e. unhealthy for EVE. |

March rabbit
Trojan Trolls Red Alliance
170
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 11:58:00 -
[72] - Quote
James 315 wrote:... My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there. The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.- 315 so basically you support botting and do all you can to replace human miners with bots?
why you still aren't banned? 
|

Drunken Bum
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 14:49:00 -
[73] - Quote
I wonder when gankers are gonna realise that they're just as sad, if not as sad, as the pathetic miners they're ganking. Quit bragging about killing miners. Its like a teenager bragging that they beat down a toddler. There is no war here. Just a buncha scrubs killing scrubs that cant/wont/dont fight back. |

Whitehound
273
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 14:54:00 -
[74] - Quote
When you go to EVE Markets / Veldspar and click on the history tab can you see how much the volume has dropped.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 15:01:00 -
[75] - Quote
Enjoy your 700mil tier 1 "gank" BS scum. |

Tikera Tissant
33
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 15:10:00 -
[76] - Quote
James 315 wrote: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.
I'll just out the obvious, as I didn't read the whole thread.
Once hulkaggedon is over, miners will go back to mining, the goons will go and start shooting at someone other than highsec'ers, and everything will go back to normal, as nothing happened.
It might take a month or two, but it will happen.
The fact that the current hulkaggedon is longer, will just cause the return of the miners to be delayed a bit longer.
Quote:Yes, and another account is free of charge, right? Not to mention the time inefficiency and increased risk factor of using multiple accounts.
If you have enough isk and enough income, a second account is free, and with the right machine multi-boxing is as easy as pie. All you need is plex. And with enough ganking, you can make a living out of it. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
36
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 15:17:00 -
[77] - Quote
Daneirkus Auralex wrote:I'd just like to add that if a large, null-sec alliance REALLY needed minerals, and it was impossible to procure them through normal means, its leadership would probably coordinate with allies, schedule a fleet, send some pings, and lo and behold, next thing you know there would be a multifaceted operation with 100 exhumers, 30 logistics, 15 orcas, 10 rorquals and a couple titans to bridge everyone around, plus 200 armor hacs w/ support on patrol spewing bubbles everywhere to protect the fleet, plus 25 carriers and 15 supercarriers on standby within jump range, a wing of stealth bombers patrolling the region, and rifterswarms guarding all the gates. And the entire constellation would probably be clear of ore within a few hours.
Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game.
Those AHACs would get instapop'd by Minnie HACs. Arty power!
Still waiting that Rokh killmail in 1.0... Seriously, pvp'ers show how good you really are. |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
648
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 15:29:00 -
[78] - Quote
Pro-tip: OP gets an erection hearing himself speak, probably likes to type out his massively long wall of texts about the lol-issue that mining is and then read it aloud to make sure his long windbag speech sounds ok.
While we are on the subject, can we just have CCP remove strip miners, mining lasers, and the refinement skill for modules (no need to refund the SP, the characters will no longer be used) to just prevent harvesting of more minerals. BLAM! Single headshot to the knee, kill the entire issue all at once and we no longer need the players to keep up the work of telling CCP how ******* poor this stupid idea of theirs has been for the last nine years (Yes CCP, mining was a **** poor boring ass profession and you are welcome for us the customers informing you). We should at least have another 6-9 months worth of ore and minerals until till demand drops and the market can dictate the price...god I would love to see a 300m rifter that wasn't set up as a scam...and then everyone will start feeling real losses when they can no longer replace their ships (and rookie ships become the new blob fleet) |

Reicheck
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 16:16:00 -
[79] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:These are great days we're living, bros. We are jolly green goons, walking New Eden with guns. These people we wasted here this month are the finest miners we will ever know. After we rotate back to Deklein, we're gonna miss not having anyone around that's worth shooting.
I am not very fond of GSF, but you sir, have earned a special place in my heart. Full Metal Goons, makes me smile.
As for the OP. Blah blah blah. You take yourself too seriously. So.. moar txt plz!!!!111 No sig here. |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 16:22:00 -
[80] - Quote
Thanx to the effort. I even plled ot my dusty hlk to make some afk iskies. Prices are definately going the right way for me to bother making some afk isk. |
|

nubile slave
Furian Necromongers
10
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 16:27:00 -
[81] - Quote
Perhaps OP could explain the drop in mineral prices? And the fact that whole areas of Eve Highsec seem to have tons of miners...? |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
88
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 16:47:00 -
[82] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Whilst it is commendable that miners are trying ganking, your appear to have missed one vital thing. If no-one is mining, and the bots are all banned, then how do you expect to pay for your ships in a years time when a cruiser costs 600mil? Or when you have to go out mining to build it....oh wait, you can't do that because you will just get blown up.
noone ever thinks about that Or theyre too wrapped up in looking to destroy "your" game to care Or they get 1 trillion in moon Goo a day so they care...
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Sigurd Sig Hansen
Hedion University Amarr Empire
149
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 16:50:00 -
[83] - Quote
nubile slave wrote:Perhaps OP could explain the drop in mineral prices? And the fact that whole areas of Eve Highsec seem to have tons of miners...? 
If you put :effort: into planning where you mine you wont replace your hulk. I never tank my hulk (not on this guy ocf) and yet I have yet to ever get ATTACKED much less lose one.
Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game |

Whitehound
274
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 17:00:00 -
[84] - Quote
nubile slave wrote:Perhaps OP could explain the drop in mineral prices? And the fact that whole areas of Eve Highsec seem to have tons of miners...?  The recent drop of mineral prices, like one could see in the last week, is due to a few players selling billions of minerals back into the market after the long climb during the months before. It is the speculators, who are cashing in on their profits. For Tritanium is it the magic 6.00 ISK barrier, which triggered it and simply because it is a round number. The price for Tritanium is however back from the recent drop and climbing again. I expect to see Tritanium stabilize at this price for the foreseeable future. Veldspar has become the 2nd most valuable high-sec ore and miners will put a lot of Tritanium into the market after Hulkageddon. Pyerite, Mexallon and Isogen could be climbing further or Tritanium might fall a little, but the ore prices (ISK/m3) are somewhat unusual and miners will cause these to adjust. Nocxium as the most valuable high-sec mineral will possibly drop further. However, in general is there no price drop and the mineral prices are all on an awesome high.
No more crappy expansions!-á-á Raise A Little Hell"20 percent of CCP staff fired." - CEO Hilmar-á-á No more crappy layoffs! |

Eaorgan Dax
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 17:45:00 -
[85] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. 1 Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. 2 As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP.
You truly are an idiot aren't you?, you have no clue what you are talking about.
Point 1, If mining in high drops further, the price of minerals will go up and the players will start mining again because it's profitable again, all hulkageddon does is restart that cycle over and over and over again.
Point 2. Miners have influence over CCP? So, you wanna tell me that's why warp core stabilizers are such pieces of crap and are hopelessly impractical on a mining barge ( it decreases range DRAMATICALLY and you need at least 2 of the freaking things ), so that nobody will ever use them for this, which in fact makes them sitting ducks when something costing 1 10th of the price of a barge, locks, scramble's and shoots them.
Time to take off your tinfoil hat mister, if anything, CCP is providing aggressors with more and better tools then it does the industrialists. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3854
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:21:00 -
[86] - Quote
Lets throw in higher refiner taxes :P
espeically reprocessing, and penalizing modules being reprocessed on thier state of repiar.
what i am not enjoying however is how my little amount of isk buys.
|

Tobiaz
Spacerats
402
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:24:00 -
[87] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:inb4 the same people who think pvp is the entire game complains that a cruiser costs as much as a plex. EVE is at its best when people take the galaxy and put it upon its head. Nothing in this game beats adding another "remember that time when..." Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:25:00 -
[88] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
402
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:28:00 -
[89] - Quote
Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome. Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Thomas Kreshant
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
77
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:36:00 -
[90] - Quote
I like the direction the game is going tbh we just need the new higher taxes and bounty nerf to be implemented and then a few months for prices to settle out a little. |
|

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:45:00 -
[91] - Quote
Yay! I like winning!
|

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
107
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:54:00 -
[92] - Quote
James 315 wrote: Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF!
no, this is not a war.. it's a battle and you are not really winning it. what exactly would you say is the goal accomplishment that has triggered your win - happy dance? hulks kills? can't be the market.
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3854
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 18:59:00 -
[93] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:inb4 the same people who think pvp is the entire game complains that a cruiser costs as much as a plex. EVE is at its best when people take the galaxy and put it upon its head. Nothing in this game beats adding another "remember that time when..." Nova Fox wrote:Lets throw in higher refiner taxes :P
espeically reprocessing, and penalizing modules being reprocessed on thier state of repiar.
what i am not enjoying however is how my little amount of isk buys. Start by making refining and reprocessing) done by slots. Then make rent dynamic like offices.
Its more like my paycheck has been doubled but the price of bread has tripled.
|

MadMuppet
Kerguelen Station
326
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 19:17:00 -
[94] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:
Its more like my paycheck has been doubled but the price of bread has tripled.
Time to research a Bread I BPO and make a profit. Wonder if there is a Yeast Datacore to make Tech II Bread? The UI is getting better (on SiSi), but please, jump on and try the new inventory system. Let's try to avoid another 'Incaran/Door' issue. The Unified Inventory is going to potentially anger a lot of players, go try it and see what you think of it. May 22nd is just around the corner! |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
402
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 19:21:00 -
[95] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:inb4 the same people who think pvp is the entire game complains that a cruiser costs as much as a plex. EVE is at its best when people take the galaxy and put it upon its head. Nothing in this game beats adding another "remember that time when..." Nova Fox wrote:Lets throw in higher refiner taxes :P
espeically reprocessing, and penalizing modules being reprocessed on thier state of repiar.
what i am not enjoying however is how my little amount of isk buys. Start by making refining and reprocessing) done by slots. Then make rent dynamic like offices. Its more like my paycheck has been doubled but the price of bread has tripled.
That's no big problem considering your paycheck probably has been doubled quite a few years in a row. Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Fredfredbug4
The Scope Gallente Federation
289
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 19:27:00 -
[96] - Quote
The people saying that prices will increase significantly are completely wrong.
It is a well acknowledged fact that most of the minerals in this game are generated not from mining, but from recycling unneeded, modules, and salvage.
Also, the hatred is not for miners in general, but hi-sec miners. Come into low and null and actually experience the game. |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
581
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 19:47:00 -
[97] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome.
Yay, sure the 350 people CCP has hired since then will think exaclty the same about CCP losing the income that justifies their paychecks...
EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 15% Nullsec; 72% Highsec. CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |

Kurai Kihaku
Commonwealth of Individuals
28
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 19:50:00 -
[98] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong. Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead. I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there. The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears. In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone! - 315
Blah, blah, blah, blah..... SHUT UP CRETIN. I am still mining, and I will keep mining. And you are doing me a great service, because now, I can sell my minerals at a higher price. TO YOU. So you can buy new ship and keep trying to kill me again.
I'll eat crow, but you can eat **ck.
M'kay?
|

BiaXia
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 19:57:00 -
[99] - Quote
Only one post? James, you're losing your touch. |

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 20:00:00 -
[100] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:That's no big problem considering your paycheck probably has been doubled quite a few years in a row. Yay! I love propaganda wars! Are we winning?! I so hope so!
|
|

Plentath
Sudden Buggery
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 20:44:00 -
[101] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome. Yay, sure the 350 people CCP has hired since then will think exaclty the same about CCP losing the income that justifies their paychecks...
I'm sure those people look at their subscription numbers, not what forum clowns think.
Why? Because those numbers show an increase where all other MMOs are shedding subscribers.
But, according to your kind, CCP ought to make the game more like the themepark MMOs that are losing subscribers?
Okay. |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
76
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:01:00 -
[102] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome. If you can't reply to me without calling me names, then **** off... |

Pok Nibin
Viziam Amarr Empire
129
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:13:00 -
[103] - Quote
You're winning a "war" against mining ships? Man. I'll notify Sun Tzu. I'm sure he'll be impressed. A war against mining ships! I wonder how you'd do against garbage trucks! (I shudder to think!) Don't fight it.-á Rejoin your Amarrian patriarchs.-á You know you want to. |

Musashi IV
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:22:00 -
[104] - Quote
After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3855
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:39:00 -
[105] - Quote
Pok Nibin wrote:You're winning a "war" against mining ships? Man. I'll notify Sun Tzu. I'm sure he'll be impressed. A war against mining ships! I wonder how you'd do against garbage trucks! (I shudder to think!) Sun Tzu acutally preached a concept concerning this.
However killing your own farms is not the best way to win a war.
As for the doubeling of the paycheck the last of the mineral stock market exchange supply just ran dry so its about to get halved. Now I have to buy expensive bread to make even more expensive sandwitches and the price competition up the chain is alot feircer than I remembered.
|

Romla Yatolila
The Wizards Of Weed Friendly Players Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 21:47:00 -
[106] - Quote
I too wish to share in the dream of some awesome spaceship PvP in low/null-sec... Too bad i'll have to do more high-sec carebareing to afford the inflated ship prices to get me going. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1368
|
Posted - 2012.05.12 23:26:00 -
[107] - Quote
Tobias Sjodin wrote:Yes, and another account is free of charge, right? Not to mention the time inefficiency and increased risk factor of using multiple accounts.
Bring on the irrelevant arguments! That's right folks, step this way and we'll start a discussion about how ganking hulks is an income generation mechanism measured in ISK/hr! No longer is it sufficient to not go backwards when ganking hulks, no siree! Now the argument has changed to "ganking hulks to collect the Goonswarm bounty isn't as profitable as mining!"
Step right up, see who can reduce the argument to the most absurd statements!
|

Romandra
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:05:00 -
[108] - Quote
A lot of people in this thread seem to entirely miss the point. I cannot be :effort: enough to read the entire thread, but just in case it hasn't been made clear to you yet, I will boil down the op post to just two words to help explain it:
James 315 wrote:highsec miners
There you go.
|

Ammatar IV
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:30:00 -
[109] - Quote
Daneirkus Auralex wrote:Ocih wrote:[quote=Karn Dulake] Gratz on winning the "war". of course now all you null, whine bears can do what you say you hate. Mine your own ******* minerals. Have fun. I'd just like to add that if a large, null-sec alliance REALLY needed minerals, and it was impossible to procure them through normal means, its leadership would probably coordinate with allies, schedule a fleet, send some pings, and lo and behold, next thing you know there would be a multifaceted operation with 100 exhumers, 30 logistics, 15 orcas, 10 rorquals and a couple titans to bridge everyone around, plus 200 armor hacs w/ support on patrol spewing bubbles everywhere to protect the fleet, plus 25 carriers and 15 supercarriers on standby within jump range, a wing of stealth bombers patrolling the region, and rifterswarms guarding all the gates. And the entire constellation would probably be clear of ore within a few hours. Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game.
Perhaps nullsec should become even remotely accessible? Not this crap we have now, either you have to be a member of a trashy forum for 3 months or have 50 million SP...
If you guys want people to come out, you sure don't act like it. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
448
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:33:00 -
[110] - Quote
Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... No one left? I really doubt the sixty bucks a month CCP gets from me will be going away any time soon. On top of that, I somehow doubt that the loss of a few thousand revolving-door players is going to affect the long-term bottom line, especially if it means CCP will no longer be obligated to continue dumbing down the game. One day, they might even be able to call it a "cold, harsh universe" again.
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Yay, sure the 350 people CCP has hired since then will think exaclty the same about CCP losing the income that justifies their paychecks... Have you considered that it might be better for a few people to lose their jobs, than it is for the whole company to go under once the carebears have had their way with the game, and left it in a crying, sopping mess to move on to another theme park?
Pok Nibin wrote:You're winning a "war" against mining ships? Man. I'll notify Sun Tzu. I'm sure he'll be impressed. A war against mining ships! I wonder how you'd do against garbage trucks! (I shudder to think!) Have you actually ever read the book? |
|

Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
72
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:33:00 -
[111] - Quote
Gankers are like that cancer cure that hasn't been invented in RL yet. |

Nylith Empyreal
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
115
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:37:00 -
[112] - Quote
Well this is one way to force a profession revamp from CCP. "Oh, you can't help that," said the troll: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" -ásaid the forumwarrior. "You must be," said the troll, "or you wouldn't have come here." |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
448
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 01:42:00 -
[113] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Tobias Sjodin wrote:Yes, and another account is free of charge, right? Not to mention the time inefficiency and increased risk factor of using multiple accounts. Bring on the irrelevant arguments! That's right folks, step this way and we'll start a discussion about how ganking hulks is an income generation mechanism measured in ISK/hr! No longer is it sufficient to not go backwards when ganking hulks, no siree! Now the argument has changed to "ganking hulks to collect the Goonswarm bounty isn't as profitable as mining!" Step right up, see who can reduce the argument to the most absurd statements! Ganker: Hi, I'm a ganker. To tell you the truth, we don't gank for the money. Sure, bounties and loot pay for some of the cost, but even without those benefits, we would continue to do it. We certainly didn't stop when CONCORD insurance was removed. When we gank, we try to make the best possible use of resources, including people, time, ISK, and sec status. We also use this type of setup for this type of outcome, and that type of setup for that type of outcome, et cetera.
You: Shut up, you're wrong. Yes, you do gank for money, so don't even try to deny it, lying scumbag. Also, I don't gank Hulks but I know more about ganking because you're dumb and stupid and you're doing it wrong, noob. |

Eve Orwell
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 02:46:00 -
[114] - Quote
Musashi IV wrote:After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5.
how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10. |

NickyYo
StarHug
74
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 02:52:00 -
[115] - Quote
When you kill eve and there is no targets left, don't go crying to CCP. (SERVICE) Need a project coding? (PHP & Javascript) https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=101893&find=unread |

NickyYo
StarHug
74
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 02:54:00 -
[116] - Quote
Eve Orwell wrote:Musashi IV wrote:After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5. how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10.
He didn't say it was halved he said half, like half of a maximum IQ and dropped to -5.
LOL got to love a goon trying to be inteligent.. (SERVICE) Need a project coding? (PHP & Javascript) https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=101893&find=unread |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1116
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 03:03:00 -
[117] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:When you kill eve and there is no targets left, don't go crying to CCP.
if and when an alliance kills eve, they will have won eve
but nobody is trying to kill eve, sometimes needed medicine can be an unpleasant experience
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
926
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 03:10:00 -
[118] - Quote
Ammatar IV wrote:Perhaps nullsec should become even remotely accessible? Not this crap we have now, either you have to be a member of a trashy forum for 3 months or have 50 million SP... Confirming I am the elite of the elite in EVE |

Eve Orwell
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 03:37:00 -
[119] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:Eve Orwell wrote:Musashi IV wrote:After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5. how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10. He didn't say it was halved he said half, like half of a maximum IQ and dropped to -5. LOL got to love a goon trying to be inteligent..
yeah, that makes even less sense than the original statement |

NickyYo
StarHug
75
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 04:08:00 -
[120] - Quote
Eve Orwell wrote:NickyYo wrote:Eve Orwell wrote:Musashi IV wrote:After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5. how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10. He didn't say it was halved he said half, like half of a maximum IQ and dropped to -5. LOL got to love a goon trying to be inteligent.. yeah, that makes even less sense than the original statement
Only to a goon :) (SERVICE) Need a project coding? (PHP & Javascript) https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=101893&find=unread |
|

Stirko Hek
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 04:43:00 -
[121] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:Eve Orwell wrote:Musashi IV wrote:After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5. how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10. He didn't say it was halved he said half, like half of a maximum IQ and dropped to -5. LOL got to love a goon trying to be inteligent..
What exactly is "half of a maximum IQ"?
It also might help if you could spell intelligent, but I dare say you probably share the vacant stare of your avatar and insinuate that you more than likely are vacant in other departments as well. |

Daneirkus Auralex
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
99
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 04:46:00 -
[122] - Quote
Ammatar IV wrote:Daneirkus Auralex wrote: Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game.
Perhaps nullsec should become even remotely accessible? Not this crap we have now, either you have to be a member of a trashy forum for 3 months or have 50 million SP... If you guys want people to come out, you sure don't act like it. My point was that nullsec is awesome.
There are many nullsec corps which have no skillpoint or forums requirements. My corp, for example. Of course, considering the substantial assets nullsec alliances routinely sling around, you may find the application process somewhat more rigorous compared to most afk/no teamwork/don't really do anything hisec corps. Feel free to join our public channel if genuinely interested. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1116
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 07:44:00 -
[123] - Quote
I'd like to try some Nullsec Cola. I keep hearing it's awesome. |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
600
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:17:00 -
[124] - Quote
Plentath wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome. Yay, sure the 350 people CCP has hired since then will think exaclty the same about CCP losing the income that justifies their paychecks... I'm sure those people look at their subscription numbers, not what forum clowns think. Why? Because those numbers show an increase where all other MMOs are shedding subscribers. But, according to your kind, CCP ought to make the game more like the themepark MMOs that are losing subscribers? Okay.
Just FYI, I never lasted any longer han 3 months in any "theme park" MMO, whereas i've been into EVE for more than 3 years. After all this time, I still don't like EVE and play it mostly because there are no alternatives.  EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 15% Nullsec; 72% Highsec. CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
722
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 08:57:00 -
[125] - Quote
Mitten linked this thread, but i don't see nothing important here. Don't worry mining won die... you wouldnt have ships to fly in. |

Dreamscanner
Methodical Prostitution The Methodical Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:06:00 -
[126] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Daneirkus Auralex wrote:Ocih wrote:[quote=Karn Dulake] Gratz on winning the "war". of course now all you null, whine bears can do what you say you hate. Mine your own ******* minerals. Have fun. I'd just like to add that if a large, null-sec alliance REALLY needed minerals, and it was impossible to procure them through normal means, its leadership would probably coordinate with allies, schedule a fleet, send some pings, and lo and behold, next thing you know there would be a multifaceted operation with 100 exhumers, 30 logistics, 15 orcas, 10 rorquals and a couple titans to bridge everyone around, plus 200 armor hacs w/ support on patrol spewing bubbles everywhere to protect the fleet, plus 25 carriers and 15 supercarriers on standby within jump range, a wing of stealth bombers patrolling the region, and rifterswarms guarding all the gates. And the entire constellation would probably be clear of ore within a few hours. Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game. TEST mining op, please ignore !
love this because it is so true... Hulkageddon can be overcome you just need the right facilities to do it |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1369
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:17:00 -
[127] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Shut up, you're wrong. Yes, you do gank for money, so don't even try to deny it, lying scumbag. Also, I don't gank Hulks but I know more about ganking because you're dumb and stupid and you're doing it wrong, noob.
If you are ganking to a budget, you need to figure out how to achieve your goals within the budget. If you want to gank with T2 fit catalysts, you need to seek a source of funding other than the Goonswarm bounties. You can't go ganking with T2 fit catalysts and then complain that you run out of money, hoping people will take pity on you.
Complaining that the second account isn't free doesn't make sense: you're not ganking for the income to buy a PLEX. You've already paid those accounts using other means otherwise you'd be doing something far more profitable than farming Goonswarm bounties.
Bottom line is: either you're ganking with a limited wallet and you need to adjust your tactics to cost you less than 10M ISK per kill, or you've got a sugar daddy (possibly your main) who doesn't care about the ISK cost. If you have a sugar daddy, go ahead and use T2 blaster catalysts, solo ganking hulks in 0.7.
|

Stirko Hek
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:26:00 -
[128] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Shut up, you're wrong. Yes, you do gank for money, so don't even try to deny it, lying scumbag. Also, I don't gank Hulks but I know more about ganking because you're dumb and stupid and you're doing it wrong, noob. If you are ganking to a budget, you need to figure out how to achieve your goals within the budget. If you want to gank with T2 fit catalysts, you need to seek a source of funding other than the Goonswarm bounties. You can't go ganking with T2 fit catalysts and then complain that you run out of money, hoping people will take pity on you. Complaining that the second account isn't free doesn't make sense: you're not ganking for the income to buy a PLEX. You've already paid those accounts using other means otherwise you'd be doing something far more profitable than farming Goonswarm bounties. Bottom line is: either you're ganking with a limited wallet and you need to adjust your tactics to cost you less than 10M ISK per kill, or you've got a sugar daddy (possibly your main) who doesn't care about the ISK cost. If you have a sugar daddy, go ahead and use T2 blaster catalysts, solo ganking hulks in 0.7.
You are not a ganker, try to limit what you say to what you know.
A follow on benefit of this is that you'll post far far less, which means less effort for you and less effort for people when they have to scroll past your posts. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3748
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:32:00 -
[129] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Just FYI, I never lasted any longer han 3 months in any "theme park" MMO, whereas i've been into EVE for more than 3 years. After all this time, I still don't like EVE and play it mostly because there are no alternatives. 
I want you to re-read what you just wrote there and consider that, just maybe, there's something you're not being honest with yourself about. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
500
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:34:00 -
[130] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:I once sat next to a miner in my tengu and it warped out. When i told him that i was not going to gank him in my ship he said that he could not be sure.
Which adds evidence that miners have the least knowledge about this game than any other profession.
Confirming that Tengus make really really bad warp-ins and are unable to book-mark. I think it's evident whose game knowledge is lacking. |
|

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
500
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 11:40:00 -
[131] - Quote
Ammatar IV wrote:
Perhaps nullsec should become even remotely accessible? Not this crap we have now, either you have to be a member of a trashy forum for 3 months or have 50 million SP...
If you guys want people to come out, you sure don't act like it.
Rubbish. We take willing people with far less skill. It's all about attitude not skill-points. A rifter with a point in the hands of a gutsy player will do far more damage than a 100M sp player in a shiny multi-billion isk T3 ship that warps away to a safe-spot at the first sign of trouble. You're just making stuff up to justify your lack of even trying to look for a way to nullsec. |

Metamonic
St. Ives Mercantile League
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 16:54:00 -
[132] - Quote
Hulkageddon will end like always, miners will return like always and they will see their ships slowly strengthen patch by patch just like before. I couldn't even begin to try and explain how insignificant this anti-highsec effort will be in the end. No one cares about the quaint efforts of a minority when an overwhelming amount of players are engaged in safe high sec industry-related tasks.
I just hope that the people trying stir the pot will not get disheartened when they come to this realization, since I hate to lose customers. After all, these events are what makes Eve so great. Even as a miner, I wouldn't want to do away with Hulkageddon. It would be like drinking coffee without sugar. =) |

Immogen Telvani
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 17:04:00 -
[133] - Quote
Gahagan wrote:I'm confused about the point. Is there a reason for wanting to remove mining from highsec, or is this just a "let's see if we can" kind of thing?
Conspiracy Theory #1 The people behind Hulkageddon are owners of Hulk BPO's
Conspiracy Theory #2 TBA |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
755
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 17:17:00 -
[134] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:[quote=Ammatar IV]
You're just making stuff up to justify your lack of even trying to look for a way to nullsec.
Why would someone need to justify their lack of trying to look for a way to nullsec?
Does it mean that this open ended sandbox in reality is MEANT to be played as somebody decided to? So is EvE a themepark like WoW, with the difference it's peer pressure and racketing that force other people going where they "are meant to go"? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 17:29:00 -
[135] - Quote
The funniest thing about the OP's idiotic post is that all through this so-called "Whatever-Geddon" , my several mining characters have been grinding away in highsec belts and selling the perfectly-skilled refined residue at premium prices. In all this time, we have yet to even see a ganker, much less lose a ship. So please do continue your efforts as the only result I have seen yet is increased income.
K Bye Thanx |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
609
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 19:24:00 -
[136] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Just FYI, I never lasted any longer han 3 months in any "theme park" MMO, whereas i've been into EVE for more than 3 years. After all this time, I still don't like EVE and play it mostly because there are no alternatives.  I want you to re-read what you just wrote there and consider that, just maybe, there's something you're not being honest with yourself about.
I'm gonna share with you a secret of life: you can do things even if you don't really like them.
FAi, i don't like taking the bus every day. But then, I like having a job, and wouldn't have it without taking the bus every day. Of course, i could buy a car and drive it to my job every day, but then i would like that even less than taking the bus, so i don't do it.
It's about incentives. One month ago my subscription was cancelled and about to expire, now i am having a modicum of fun mining in a BS, and so i paid one month of subscription.
This doesn't changes that I wouldn't mind to see EVE crumble to dust if i found an alternative i enjoyed better and which suited more to my philosophy of life... not that I want EVE to fail, but, wouldn't cry over it as long as I had an alternative.
And, IMXHO, i think that people would really like better a game more suit to my philoosphy of life, than they like EVE. I mean, sane people at least... EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 15% Nullsec; 72% Highsec. CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
189
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 19:25:00 -
[137] - Quote
Daneirkus Auralex wrote:Ocih wrote:[quote=Karn Dulake] Gratz on winning the "war". of course now all you null, whine bears can do what you say you hate. Mine your own ******* minerals. Have fun. I'd just like to add that if a large, null-sec alliance REALLY needed minerals, and it was impossible to procure them through normal means, its leadership would probably coordinate with allies, schedule a fleet, send some pings, and lo and behold, next thing you know there would be a multifaceted operation with 100 exhumers, 30 logistics, 15 orcas, 10 rorquals and a couple titans to bridge everyone around, plus 200 armor hacs w/ support on patrol spewing bubbles everywhere to protect the fleet, plus 25 carriers and 15 supercarriers on standby within jump range, a wing of stealth bombers patrolling the region, and rifterswarms guarding all the gates. And the entire constellation would probably be clear of ore within a few hours. Perhaps people should make some friends, come to nullsec and start playing the real game.
I never saw anything quite that elaborate but was part of the gate camps when someone found a grav plex in a dead end system. 15 hulks and a Rorqual would have it mopped up in an hr or so. The thing I saw with all those cases, the minerals all ended up in Jita and as much as they made a substantial amount of ISK for the hr it took, they weren't a valid percentage of what came in to Jita and it didn't happen enough to feed the market essential production of EVE.
I have also never saw a developed null sec market that could in fact ignore Jita or high sec. One based on minerals and moon mats, not based on Jita resales. One designed to actually promote production in null sec. The reasons being simple ISK. It has always been cheaper to buy than to make and sec status and supply have never played a factor in to the process. It was just one of those broken and mysterious anomalies of EVE.
|

Vangelios
Hedion University Amarr Empire
27
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 19:34:00 -
[138] - Quote
And so once again My dear Johnny 315 my dear friend And so once again you are fightin' us all And when I ask you why You raise your sticks and cry, and I fall Oh, my friend How did you come To trade the fiddle for the drum You say I have turned Like the enemies you've earned But I can remember All the good things you are And so I ask you please Can I help you find the peace and the star Oh, my friend What time is this To trade the handshake for the fist
...-áEach small candle Lights a corner of the dark... |

Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
263
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 19:45:00 -
[139] - Quote
Yield mined per system should be Available via API.
Make it so!
Good stuff.
---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor Federal Consensus Outreach
870
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 19:50:00 -
[140] - Quote
Ocih wrote:I have also never saw a developed null sec market that could in fact ignore Jita or high sec. One based on minerals and moon mats, not based on Jita resales.
They don't exist. Can't exist, in fact, given the current widespread contempt for industrialists. Mane 614
|
|

Major Spag
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
128
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 20:59:00 -
[141] - Quote
I too have not had my hulk killed in Hulkageddon. This must mean that A) there are no goons b) Hulkageddon is completely ineffectual and c) I am the most elite rock laser pewpewer in all of eve!
Btw, my own back water corner of eve is always indicative of the entirety of the game!
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3755
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 21:10:00 -
[142] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:Ocih wrote:I have also never saw a developed null sec market that could in fact ignore Jita or high sec. One based on minerals and moon mats, not based on Jita resales. They don't exist. Can't exist, in fact, given the current widespread contempt for industrialists.
Serious question: why should any nullsec organisation respect industrialists when there's always another one who'll sell for slightly less? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
507
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 21:17:00 -
[143] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Yield mined per system should be Available via API.
It's available from the EVE map. Learn what the Industry development index actually means. If a system stays at Industry 5 all week it's a pretty safe bet there is a lot of mining going on there. |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
507
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 21:22:00 -
[144] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Why would someone need to justify their lack of trying to look for a way to nullsec?
That seems to be the impression I got from the GP. Honestly I think care-bears should stay in empire, but GP deserved some sort of reply.
It really doesn't matter to me how people choose to play their game. I do however have much more fun in null than anywhere else in EVE. |

Scien Inkunen
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 21:26:00 -
[145] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec ..................acts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone!
- 315
Somebody is making a lot of ISK from minerals. Read the "Fart file" and you will understand the meaning of life ! |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1383
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 22:00:00 -
[146] - Quote
Scien Inkunen wrote:Somebody is making a lot of ISK from minerals.
More likely is that someone speculated at the top of the bubble and is desperately trying to manipulate the market into rising again so they can dump their 7 ISK tritanium. |

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 22:33:00 -
[147] - Quote
tl;dr
I know how to fix the government, but can't be pissed to run for office. But I know I'm right. |

Nimbus Cloud Liebrum
The Craniac The Aurora Shadow
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 22:36:00 -
[148] - Quote
Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF
War? more like terrorism but whatever helps you sleep at night. its not a war when the other side isnt and doesnt care to fight. Who put the-á"Viscous"-áin Viscous Pyroxeres? |

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
389
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 22:42:00 -
[149] - Quote
Nimbus Cloud Liebrum wrote: War? more like terrorism but whatever helps you sleep at night.
I Always wanted a fleshed out Equilibrium of Mankind faction with its own ships, be I see its been here all along. We ARE EoM. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
1384
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 22:59:00 -
[150] - Quote
Nimbus Cloud Liebrum wrote:War? more like terrorism but whatever helps you sleep at night. its not a war when the other side isnt and doesnt care to fight.
Terrorism would be when people aren't mining due to the fear of gankers being out there. It would be terrorism if, six months down the track, people refused to undock in a Hulk for fear of being ganked.
What we have is a riot on the streets, not terrorism. The riot is fuelled by a public competition with awards to people who inflict the most damage.
|
|

Nimbus Cloud Liebrum
The Craniac The Aurora Shadow
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 23:04:00 -
[151] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Nimbus Cloud Liebrum wrote:War? more like terrorism but whatever helps you sleep at night. its not a war when the other side isnt and doesnt care to fight. Terrorism would be when people aren't mining due to the fear of gankers being out there. It would be terrorism if, six months down the track, people refused to undock in a Hulk for fear of being ganked. What we have is a riot on the streets, not terrorism. The riot is fuelled by a public competition with awards to people who inflict the most damage.
"Highsec mining drops by HALF"
this isnt a result of fear?
Who put the-á"Viscous"-áin Viscous Pyroxeres? |

Aurelius Valentius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
122
|
Posted - 2012.05.13 23:32:00 -
[152] - Quote
I would just say this:
1. I used to belt mine, for the low-ends, have a Orca, Hulk, Mack, and had a Skiff at one time but never used it... now, while I still have them, I have not belt mined in something like 14 Months.
2. I used to milk Mining Missions (L4s) for LPs for stuff in the LP store (extremely dull, but it paid the light-bill)...
3. I have since stopped both, because while I am "care-bear" as such, I am into all aspect of the games careers, I did have thoughts about doing "Mining and Production" as a mainline profession, but...
I suppose it will balance out - heck my Orca is now as much as my Providence cost me 3 years ago... 750M or whatever it is now, and then the hulk has doubled or even tripled in value... etc.
SO ... I guess this is a good thing, for me I see it being that once demand and price reach a certain point, people WILL start to produce that, but until then or if it falls they then stop and do something else...
I guess will have to see, I am offline for the HAG5 due to the PC getting a total overhaul... in dry-dock. Def worth watching from the side-lines though. it's all about the Frame Rate... |

Tobias Sjodin
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
143
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 05:17:00 -
[153] - Quote
Tikera Tissant wrote: If you have enough isk and enough income, a second account is free, and with the right machine multi-boxing is as easy as pie. All you need is plex. And with enough ganking, you can make a living out of it.
Daft much? A second account is not free in the same way that a ship is not free, and the issue is not the amount of processing power in terms of using multiple accounts. If you are terrible at EVE you should at least have the decency not to post. Ronald Reagan: I do not like Sweden, they support communism. Minister: Sir, but Sweden are anti-communist, Sir.-á Ronald Reagan: I do not care what kind of communists they are. |

Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
263
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 05:26:00 -
[154] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Spurty wrote:Yield mined per system should be Available via API.
It's available from the EVE map. Learn what the Industry development index actually means. If a system stays at Industry 5 all week it's a pretty safe bet there is a lot of mining going on there.
Where's the part that gives me numbers. A lot means nothing to me. I want to be able to point and go "Jesus ******* christ, 200 asteroids were mined in system XYZ in the last hour!" who wants to wait a week? Oof.
We have it for NPCs / killed. you can look at to see how busy compared to the rest.
---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Digital Messiah
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
213
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 05:28:00 -
[155] - Quote
war on mining? More like the war on cheap ships. Hulkageddon is the ultimate masochistic event to ever exist. On a side note, I hope this leads more people to forming corporations and learning how to play safer. D-scan is a rather under used tool. "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn"
|

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 05:59:00 -
[156] - Quote
I'm not going to sit here and try to convince anyone that mining is fun. Fun, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
I am one of those who enjoys mining for the zen feeling. Or, if I'm in Low Sec, I enjoy it by how it grabs my attention and forces me to stay focused, since anyone can jump me at any time.
I do, however, object to the sense of entitlement that the non-harvesters have towards the harvesters.
I don't blame them for it (well, okay, maybe I do a little). For years, Eve has been a game built for the destroyers. In order to accomplish something, it was necessary to destroy. Need Zydrine? Destroy meta 0 loot. Need Nocxium? Destroy Drones. Need Technium? Destroy POSes. Need ISK? Destroy complexes.
This is the house that CCP built and harvesters had to live in. Second class citizens to the destroyers. That has generated an attitude that this is "their game." How dare we harvesters try to make a living here! We should be destroying along with everyone else! We're doing it wrong!
You think Burn Jita, OTECH and Hulkageddon occurring so quickly after the Inferno patch that gave a huge boost to harvesters is a coincidence? It is the destroyers exercising their dominance. Showing everyone that despite what happened in Inferno, they are still the 'true masters' of Eve, that the harvesters and builders are still nothing more than beggars, living at the sufferance of the destroyers.
That is the attitude I despise. Not the fact that harvesters are being destroyed. That happening, the possibility, the freedom that allows such things to happen, I welcome. It is the fact that people think we should be destroyed, that somehow we are an aberration that either needs to be changed or driven out. The attitude that says there is no place for us in New Eden, and that we should not be here, that is what is wrong. |

Kreeia Dgore
EntroPrelatial Industria T A B O O
16
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 06:11:00 -
[157] - Quote
To be honest i don't see any reasons for a better change for miners unless pve drops are nerfed in terms of mineral profit. Not like its going to happen, so its not like things are gonna get better. Missioning with at least two characters (pve ship + noctis) is so much more profitable than two characters mining (hulk + hauler) its not even nice to talk about it., since the bounties themselfves pays more than mining yield, count in the salvage and we know what NOT to do (mine). |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 06:29:00 -
[158] - Quote
Kreeia Dgore wrote:To be honest i don't see any reasons for a better change for miners unless pve drops are nerfed in terms of mineral profit.
This already happened. Or are you talking about nerfing mission loot even more? |

baltec1
1162
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 06:33:00 -
[159] - Quote
Nimbus Cloud Liebrum wrote:
"Highsec mining drops by HALF"
this isnt a result of fear?
Nah, it more to do with the fact half of the barges have exploded. |

Mangold
Born-2-Kill Northern Coalition.
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 08:24:00 -
[160] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Nimbus Cloud Liebrum wrote:
"Highsec mining drops by HALF"
this isnt a result of fear?
Nah, it more to do with the fact half of the barges have exploded.
Get your facts straight. It's only 4000+ dead barges so far and according to CCP Diagoras 5762 died in April, 5381 died in March. I'm personally surpriced that the difference is so small and I'd expect a lot more dead barges compared to a normal month. That can not explain the drop in high sec mining. I'd say that fear of being ganked is the driving force for this change.
|
|

El Puerco
Abh Academy Abh Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 08:54:00 -
[161] - Quote
i dont care either way.. my minerals will sell like crazy thanks to hulkageddon :) Errare humanum est. |

Loodo Viscious
6th Dimension Research and Development
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 09:36:00 -
[162] - Quote
MadMuppet wrote:It is still too soon to tell anything. If it rained for three days in a row I swear half the forum whiners on here would be building an ark and begin collecting two of every creature that lives with them in their parent's basement. If it didn't rain for three days they would be screaming global warming, demand a larger tank to store water, and die of dehydration from all the tears they shed.
They are the goldfish of Eve, swimming around New Eden bumping in to mirrors and screaming at themselves for being in the way because their short term memory is about thirty seconds. Like little yapping boot polishing toy-breed dogs they serve little purpose but to make noise, **** the carpets, and on an extremely rare occasion manage to disrupt or kill a much larger dog by getting caught in its throat.
You need to give it time. The Eve economy is a process, not a single act. You need to understand that every change needs time to gestate before coming to fruition. One human can make one baby in nine months. The forum whiners believe that if nine people work together (the Goons) they can make the baby happen in one month. The actual long term effects will still take nine months. In those same nine months you can make a baby of your own, but you want it in two weeks. Unless your last name is Jolie, it probably isn't going to magically appear.
+ 1000000 internets. Facking brilliant. |

Marcin Arkaral
Globaltech Industries Eternal Evocations
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 09:58:00 -
[163] - Quote
I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me. |

Selene Theron
Hedion University Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 10:00:00 -
[164] - Quote
Marcin Arkaral wrote:I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me.
For certain people that is the perfect scenario.  Its not that hard to grasp if you think about it. |

Kogh Ayon
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
37
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 10:01:00 -
[165] - Quote
Marcin Arkaral wrote:I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me. Much better if minerals were sold by NPC? |

Aldeskwatso
New Horizon Enterprises Beyond All Bounds
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 10:15:00 -
[166] - Quote
Marcin Arkaral wrote:...This will only drive mineral prices up...
Sounds good to me^^ More pay for less work. Tho noxcium was a bit underpriced at one time but saved it and made a 17mil additional profit for no work at all.
Still a cut down to almost 50% on mined stuffs in high sec. Didn't expect that to be honest. Guess more miners need to wise up.
When I point to the moon don't stare a my finger! |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
983
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 10:53:00 -
[167] - Quote
Dreadknoght Lomaree wrote:You are an idiot if you think that mineral inputs droppng 50% is a good thing...
Where do you think that every ship in eve came from? Every ship that dies in hulkaggedon, the miner & the ganker, costs minerals to build. Now, miners in high-sec bring in the largest total of minerals in eve, and you think this is a good thing? You think miners will want to go into low-sec or 0.0 when all of this is going on?
Yeah, lets see you in a few weeks when ships begin to increase in price 10-fold (which means tens of millions of isk for a single frigate!)
And im not even talking about the destroyed modules prices... You seem to be mistaking us for people too space poor to pay a little bit more for our ships.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
508
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 11:18:00 -
[168] - Quote
Spurty wrote:
Where's the part that gives me numbers. A lot means nothing to me. I want to be able to point and go "Jesus ******* christ, 200 asteroids were mined in system XYZ in the last hour!" who wants to wait a week? Oof.
The actual numbers don't mean anything. Seriously do you really care if 3001 m3 were mined in the past minute, versus 3478m3? However the industry level implies some numbers thanks to the system decay that has to be fended off to prevent the level falling. To maintain industry 5 you need 12M m3 worth of mining per 24 hours. To maintain industry 3, you need 3M m3 mined per 24 hours. It's up to you to use google and a calculator to figure out the rest. Yeah it's an "average" number, but it's a real number. |

Peter Raptor
Plutonian Army
146
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 11:32:00 -
[169] - Quote
James 315; "As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP."
LOL, youre mixing us miners up with the Goons  Evelopedia;-á
The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion -áGÇá-á-á |

Aron Croup
Incompatible Protocol Bittervet Mercenaries
95
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 11:32:00 -
[170] - Quote
This is the really short version:
- Goonswarm funds hulkageddon with technetium, paying gankers 100m ISK for 10 kills.
- Hulkageddon effectively cuts the amount of mined ORE in high-sec by 50%
Ergo, one broken game mechanic allows the breaking of another game mechanic.
|
|

Steel Wraith
51
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 12:29:00 -
[171] - Quote
Stirko Hek wrote:NickyYo wrote:Eve Orwell wrote:Musashi IV wrote:After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5. how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10. He didn't say it was halved he said half, like half of a maximum IQ and dropped to -5. LOL got to love a goon trying to be inteligent.. What exactly is "half of a maximum IQ"? It also might help if you could spell intelligent, but I dare say you probably share the vacant stare of your avatar and insinuate that you more than likely are vacant in other departments as well.
He means it dropped by half in the same way high-sec mining dropped by half:
x = y x^2 = xy x^2 - y^2 = x*y - y^2 (x - y)(x + y) = y(x - y) (x - y)(x + y)/(x - y) = y(x - y)/(x - y) x + y = y y + y = y 2y = y 2 = 1 |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
180
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 12:47:00 -
[172] - Quote
Kogh Ayon wrote:Marcin Arkaral wrote:I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me. Much better if minerals were sold by NPC?
I doubt the mining profession will die off entirely. If prices go high enough, it'd even be economical to mine in a tanked battleship, if necessary. And of course suicide ganking won't effect null and WH mining ops, since they already know how to mind their ships. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1132
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 13:14:00 -
[173] - Quote
If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested. |

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 14:42:00 -
[174] - Quote
I agree from what I have seen first hand :: the belts are a freakin' set of ghost towns now, and the roidz tend to have max m3. So, yeah, thanks for clearing out the belts! In fact, our scouts have found many wrecked hulks and the presence of Concorde all around us, and yet we mine without harassment. We do see a bunch of guys mining in cruisers, which may well be part of the explanation for the mining reduction.
Having said that, we are mining almost as much as usual, but we do so in a fleet of Rokhs with a Drake as the mining boss (my main). The one drawback is that we must use jet cans, so griefers come around and steal ore from time to time, but for the most part, we get left alone to harvest ore and supply minerals to a hungry public and profit as usual. Our fleet is described here. We recently recruited another guy making it a 3@Rokh + 1@Drake (Boss) fleet. We have always flown Rokhs during HulkaG, but this is the first year we actually formed up a mining fleet due to the atypical one month duration.
Our attitude is that maybe Rokh fleets will get targeted in HulkaG VI, but the gankers are gonna have to spend some ISK and generally function with a coordinated effort to take out a ships(s) with Incursion quality tanks and with omni resists in the 90's. Admittedly, the Drake is the wimpiest ship in the fleet ... but way cheaper to replace than an Orca in the event it is targeted.
So yeah - thanks for clearing out the belts. I'm not sure it's all that good for the economy, but as a statement of having an impact on the game, just look at the empty belts... |

Anastysia
Bluestar Mining and Industrial
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 15:03:00 -
[175] - Quote
Let me see if I have this straight...
James 315 and friends have more or less removed human miners from high sec mining, leaving only bots behind.
Seems odd that they would be leaving bots behind, unless they were behind them. And since the bots are profiting from their actions, well.... |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
984
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 16:35:00 -
[176] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested. It isn't hurting miners, in fact as mineral prices go up newbie miners (who belong in high sec) will be earning higher ISK/hour.
All thanks to James 315 and his ilk's tireless efforts to rid Eve of those overly-experienced miners that should have grown the balls to leave high sec years ago.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Nephilius
Knights of Athena Star Council
449
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 16:45:00 -
[177] - Quote
The more I think about this, the more absurd it seems. To call it a war implies that both sides have an equal chance at victory.  "If." |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 17:04:00 -
[178] - Quote
Anastysia wrote:Let me see if I have this straight...
James 315 and friends have more or less removed human miners from high sec mining, leaving only bots behind.
Seems odd that they would be leaving bots behind, unless they were behind them. And since the bots are profiting from their actions, well....
There's no need to bring out the conspiracy theories. Hulkageddon is open to anyone. If bots aren't being killed, its because they're better at avoiding/surviving ganks than human miners. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1134
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 17:33:00 -
[179] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested. It isn't hurting miners, in fact as mineral prices go up newbie miners (who belong in high sec) will be earning higher ISK/hour. All thanks to James 315 and his ilk's tireless efforts to rid Eve of those overly-experienced miners that should have grown the balls to leave high sec years ago. I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices? |

Uusuras Oramara
Asemakaavi Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 17:39:00 -
[180] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
How gracious of everyone. |
|

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1134
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 17:43:00 -
[181] - Quote
Uusuras Oramara wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices? How gracious of everyone. Sorry, didn't get you there... Were you trolling? |

baltec1
1162
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 17:50:00 -
[182] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote: I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
Hasn't stopped them in the past 9 years. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1134
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:03:00 -
[183] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jake Warbird wrote: I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
Hasn't stopped them in the past 9 years. But isn't this the most successful Hulkageddon yet? Or have miners been killed in the same magnitude since Eve went online? Just trying to figure things out ofc. So I can tell the guys who mine in my corp. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:07:00 -
[184] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote: I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
How many suicide ganks of mining frigates/cruisers have you seen? Gankers primarily target Hulks and Mackinaws. Anyone flying those aren't new miners.
|

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1134
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:11:00 -
[185] - Quote
Takseen wrote:Jake Warbird wrote: I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
How many suicide ganks of mining frigates/cruisers have you seen? Gankers primarily target Hulks and Mackinaws. Anyone flying those aren't new miners. Yeah, I guess you could be right. Well, nothing more from me on it. Just asking a few questions is all. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
985
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:14:00 -
[186] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested. It isn't hurting miners, in fact as mineral prices go up newbie miners (who belong in high sec) will be earning higher ISK/hour. All thanks to James 315 and his ilk's tireless efforts to rid Eve of those overly-experienced miners that should have grown the balls to leave high sec years ago. I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices? Yes, because the genuine newbies are not the ones getting ganked. I mean very rarely do you see anyone target one of the mining frigates/cruisers, or even covetors.
And as for people claiming hulk pilots are newbies: Seriously go away. It takes like two months just to sit in one. If you've been playing Eve for months you should have by that point gotten used to the idea that you might occasionally die if you don't pay attention.
All the hulk multiboxing high sec bots do is drive down low end mineral prices and make life hell for genuine noobs. They should have, by all rights, left high sec and started mining high end minerals off in low/null sec years ago.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1135
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:19:00 -
[187] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested. It isn't hurting miners, in fact as mineral prices go up newbie miners (who belong in high sec) will be earning higher ISK/hour. All thanks to James 315 and his ilk's tireless efforts to rid Eve of those overly-experienced miners that should have grown the balls to leave high sec years ago. I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices? Yes, because the genuine newbies are not the ones getting ganked. I mean very rarely do you see anyone target one of the mining frigates/cruisers, or even covetors. And as for people claiming hulk pilots are newbies: Seriously go away. It takes like two months just to sit in one. If you've been playing Eve for months you should have by that point gotten used to the idea that you might occasionally die if you don't pay attention. All the hulk multiboxing high sec bots do is drive down low end mineral prices and make life hell for genuine noobs. They should have, by all rights, left high sec and started mining high end minerals off in low/null sec years ago.
Yep, I understand. Thank you for taking the time to type out a reply. There are more than a few guys mining in the corp I am in right now. I just wanted to get all sides of an argument before I talked to them. They are pretty old and hence a bit stubborn. Just wanted to let them know what it's really all about. |

baltec1
1162
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:22:00 -
[188] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jake Warbird wrote: I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
Hasn't stopped them in the past 9 years. But isn't this the most successful Hulkageddon yet? Or have miners been killed in the same magnitude since Eve went online? Just trying to figure things out ofc. So I can tell the guys who mine in my corp.
There are more miners than ever before and a huge number have no idea how to tank a ship. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1135
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:30:00 -
[189] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: There are more miners than ever before and a huge number have no idea how to tank a ship.
Lol,yeah I see that everyday. Some fits are truly bad! But does fitting for tank solve the problem or do they just bring more firepower? |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
328
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:31:00 -
[190] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:baltec1 wrote: There are more miners than ever before and a huge number have no idea how to tank a ship.
Lol,yeah I see that everyday. Some fits are truly bad! But does fitting for tank solve the problem or do they just bring more firepower?
they gank the untanked hulk next to you instead eh |
|

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1135
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:35:00 -
[191] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:baltec1 wrote: There are more miners than ever before and a huge number have no idea how to tank a ship.
Lol,yeah I see that everyday. Some fits are truly bad! But does fitting for tank solve the problem or do they just bring more firepower? they gank the untanked hulk next to you instead Hehe,gotcha. Thank you for being patient everyone. I hope to see less people lose mining barges from corp. |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:47:00 -
[192] - Quote
I have afk mined every single day this month (and most days last month). I haven't even been targeted let alone shot at, I think remember I am pretty afk, but definitely haven't died or been taken into armor. If you're flying a Hulk during Hulkageddon you deserve to lose it. If you lose even one Hulk you made a lot less profit than the dude in the covetor who lost no ships. People don't waste nados on Covetors, and single destroyers are easily foiled by a slight tank.
I usually don't afk mine (only have mining barge iv and the skill with an A that increases mining yield at iv.), but the profits are much higher than usually. Although I don't think highly of internet bullies or gankers as they're called in eve, I do enjoy profiting off their douchebaggery. |

Ammatar IV
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 18:57:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Ammatar IV wrote:
Perhaps nullsec should become even remotely accessible? Not this crap we have now, either you have to be a member of a trashy forum for 3 months or have 50 million SP...
If you guys want people to come out, you sure don't act like it.
Rubbish. We take willing people with far less skill. It's all about attitude not skill-points. A rifter with a point in the hands of a gutsy player will do far more damage than a 100M sp player in a shiny multi-billion isk T3 ship that warps away to a safe-spot at the first sign of trouble. You're just making stuff up to justify your lack of even trying to look for a way to nullsec.
Thank you for letting me know how I really feel, I appreciate it Please, I hope you come in pocket size so I can take you everywhere; I need someone to let me know what to say and why I is clueless noob otherwise, oh mighty internet spaceship hero, have mercy on my pitiful soul. 
I've attempted joining null sec corps, have been scammed and denied, have gone in solo and been popped and chased and shouted out of peoples "property." But I'm going to try the Foreign Legion this time. So please, before you decide to gift us with your almighty insight do remember, you probably don't know **** about it. Peace. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
986
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 19:06:00 -
[194] - Quote
Ammatar IV wrote:Ptraci wrote:Ammatar IV wrote:
Perhaps nullsec should become even remotely accessible? Not this crap we have now, either you have to be a member of a trashy forum for 3 months or have 50 million SP...
If you guys want people to come out, you sure don't act like it.
Rubbish. We take willing people with far less skill. It's all about attitude not skill-points. A rifter with a point in the hands of a gutsy player will do far more damage than a 100M sp player in a shiny multi-billion isk T3 ship that warps away to a safe-spot at the first sign of trouble. You're just making stuff up to justify your lack of even trying to look for a way to nullsec. Thank you for letting me know how I really feel, I appreciate it  Please, I hope you come in pocket size so I can take you everywhere; I need someone to let me know what to say and why  I is clueless noob otherwise, oh mighty internet spaceship hero, have mercy on my pitiful soul.  I've attempted joining null sec corps, have been scammed and denied, have gone in solo and been popped and chased and shouted out of peoples "property." But I'm going to try the Foreign Legion this time. So please, before you decide to gift us with your almighty insight do remember, you probably don't know **** about it. Peace. Either that or, as Ptraci pointed out, it really is all about attitude. Your attitude just happens to be that of an incurably dense asshat, which is why null sec players scam and kill you at every opportunity.
I've run low sec and null sec alliances, and we used to let in pretty much anybody if they were willing to learn. Hell we even had a few awoxxers we kept with us in taboo, they ended up helping us hot drop a few people before we got supercaps of our own.
Basically try being less of a douche, maybe then you'll make some friends and you won't be blindly chased out of any alliance you try to join.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Ammatar IV
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 19:36:00 -
[195] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Ammatar IV][quote=Ptraci][quote=Ammatar IV]
Basically try being less of a douche, maybe then you'll make some friends and you won't be blindly chased out of any alliance you try to join.
Someone accuses me of "just making stuff up" and speaks for me without any knowledge...so I have an angered response. Must be a douche Sorry, I'll go take care of female hygiene needs now I guess  
Also, when arguing that someone is too "douchey", it would be nice to avoid using terms like "dense asshat" to describe people you've never met or spoken to, it sets up a bit of a double standard. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
986
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 19:59:00 -
[196] - Quote
Ammatar IV wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:[quote=Ammatar IV][quote=Ptraci][quote=Ammatar IV]
Basically try being less of a douche, maybe then you'll make some friends and you won't be blindly chased out of any alliance you try to join. Someone accuses me of "just making stuff up" and speaks for me without any knowledge...so I have an angered response. Must be a douche  Sorry, I'll go take care of female hygiene needs now I guess   Also, when arguing that someone is too "douchey", it would be nice to avoid using terms like "dense asshat" to describe people you've never met or spoken to, it sets up a bit of a double standard. I am also a douche, I am quite comfortable with this fact.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

RomeStar
Space Harpes
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 20:18:00 -
[197] - Quote
As an Indy pilot I think this is great. I wish they would do hulkageddon every month just for the simple fact it eliminates the competition, and drives mineral prices through the rooof. |

Mangold
Born-2-Kill Northern Coalition.
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 20:27:00 -
[198] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote: All the hulk multiboxing high sec bots do is drive down low end mineral prices and make life hell for genuine noobs. They should have, by all rights, left high sec and started mining high end minerals off in low/null sec years ago.
Why? |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
424
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 21:28:00 -
[199] - Quote
I came in expecting another stupid manifesto... Was pleasantly surprised to see evidence that his mommy is curtailing his online time.
Makes as much sense as his logic...
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Char Amadeus
Retardation Outsmarted Me
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 21:29:00 -
[200] - Quote
Is it wrong that I hear Hulkageddon and think "SNAP INTO A SLIM JIM!"?
On a serious note, I support it, because it proves that the EVE universe is truly open and player controlled (within the bounds of the agreements we click "Accept" on). Also, if you can get a nice ship, expand outside of the noob zone. As a noob, I can honestly say it's irritating to share a belt with ships that cost more than I've ever made. I believe that violates the "fairness" preached about throughout this topic. People that know what they're doing should primarily operate in low-sec (unless they're teaching a noob how to not suck).
Also, why is everyone getting so emotional and personal about this? It's a game. I don't go on forums and call people retards when I get my ass beat by an invader in Dark Souls. I simply proclaim "damn" (loudly), and move on. If I start getting too passionate about the issue, I take a hiatus to cool off. On that same note, it's just as bad to proclaim people who play a certain way to be ********. Some people like the industry part of the game. It should be accepted that some people like CoD, and others like Sim City. One shouldn't speak down on the profession of another, even if that profession turns you into space dust every now and again. |
|

arcca jeth
Dark Alliance Dark Empire Alliance
80
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 21:37:00 -
[201] - Quote
all events like this, are just killboard efficiency whoring, for a bunch of bored internet spaceship nerds |

MadMuppet
Kerguelen Station
348
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 21:53:00 -
[202] - Quote
arcca jeth wrote:all events like this, are just killboard efficiency whoring, for a bunch of bored internet spaceship nerds
... with much profit to be had if you plan. The Unified Inventory system for Inferno, which I would recommend everybody tryon SiSi, is going to be the next 'Door' for CCP. What it adds is worthless when we lose so much functionality.-á |

TravisWB
The Gallente Rangers
47
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 23:42:00 -
[203] - Quote
Lots of miners equals low ore prices and therefore by extension low Tech 1 ship prices. This is the noob friendly game that was EVE 4 years ago.
Full scale all out Goon war on Hisec eliminates miners, causing ore prices to skyrocket, causing Tech 1 ship prices to skyrocket.
This is the current anti-noob version of EVE.
GOONSVERSE.
What you are actually witnessing is the Goons intentionally and actualy destroying EVE.
Why CCP does not see the obvious malicious intent here is simply stupifying. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6760
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 23:47:00 -
[204] - Quote
TravisWB wrote:Lots of miners equals low ore prices and therefore by extension low Tech 1 ship prices. This is the noob friendly game that was EVE 4 years ago.
Full scale all out Goon war on Hisec eliminates miners, causing ore prices to skyrocket, causing Tech 1 ship prices to skyrocket.
This is the current anti-noob version of EVE. GǪexcept that the GÇ£current anti-noob versionGÇ¥ has pretty much the same ship prices as the supposedly GÇ£noob friendlyGÇ¥ EVE of four years ago. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Shift-click does nothing GÇö why the Unified Inventory isn't ready for primetime. |

TravisWB
The Gallente Rangers
47
|
Posted - 2012.05.14 23:55:00 -
[205] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:Lots of miners equals low ore prices and therefore by extension low Tech 1 ship prices. This is the noob friendly game that was EVE 4 years ago.
Full scale all out Goon war on Hisec eliminates miners, causing ore prices to skyrocket, causing Tech 1 ship prices to skyrocket.
This is the current anti-noob version of EVE. GǪexcept that the Gǣcurrent anti-noob versionGǥ has pretty much the same ship prices as the supposedly Gǣnoob friendlyGǥ EVE of four years ago.
You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
6761
|
Posted - 2012.05.15 00:01:00 -
[206] - Quote
TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said?
Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Shift-click does nothing GÇö why the Unified Inventory isn't ready for primetime. |

Ginseng Jita
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.15 00:05:00 -
[207] - Quote
TravisWB wrote:Lots of miners equals low ore prices and therefore by extension low Tech 1 ship prices. This is the noob friendly game that was EVE 4 years ago.
Full scale all out Goon war on Hisec eliminates miners, causing ore prices to skyrocket, causing Tech 1 ship prices to skyrocket.
This is the current anti-noob version of EVE.
GOONSVERSE.
What you are actually witnessing is the Goons intentionally and actualy destroying EVE.
Why CCP does not see the obvious malicious intent here is simply stupifying.
Suggestion - go into kitchen, grab some tin foil, fold into hat, put on head. |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
508
|
Posted - 2012.05.15 00:18:00 -
[208] - Quote
Ammatar IV wrote: So please, before you decide to gift us with your almighty insight do remember, you probably don't know **** about it. Peace.
Confirming I have no nullsec experience. Oh wait - I do. Seriously I thought I was helping you but hey whatever, stay in high sec then if it's so hard to find a decent nullsec alliance. |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
970
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 14:41:00 -
[209] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
Plus, it's a whole lot easier for that new player to make 50M ISK to buy the hull then it was 4 years ago. Especially if they take advantage of newer features like Planetary Interaction, or take advantage of the rise in mineral costs. All that extra ISK floating around in older player's wallets mean that they are willing to pay more for others to do the 'scut' work of EVE.
Sure, the fixed income stuff like mission running isn't as good as it used to be, but as with every 'mature' MMO market, there's always ISK to be made in the resource gathering fields (mining, PI, exploration). Get your ISK from other players, not the NPCs. |

Jessica Sweetwater
Novindus Equilibrium Frentix Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 15:03:00 -
[210] - Quote
And what james?
All you've done si drive the prices of everything sky high
Keep it up because soon even you wont be able to fit a bc out t2 without spending 100mil+
Then ull be here bitching about prices
Your idiots, plain and simple
Empire is where you buy your stuff, all uve done, is broken the market and your to stupid to see the consequences |
|

TravisWB
53
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 23:37:00 -
[211] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
I do not believe that.
I know for a fact that mineral prices 4 years ago were far below what they are now. In some cases such as NOX by a factor of 10X LESS. By extension, things made out of minerals cost far less as well.
|

Unit757
North Point Cannabis Legionis
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.16 23:47:00 -
[212] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
I've only been playing for about 3 years, but 50 mil for a drake? You can't expect that to be believable, when since I started up until about 4-6 months ago, you could buy an Armageddon for +/- 40 mil? You may want to check your suppliers if you've been paying 50 mil for drakes for the last 4 years Yes they are 50 mil now, but 4 years ago? dunno, didn't play then, but 3 years ago, try 25 mil. |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
165
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 00:21:00 -
[213] - Quote
I think you might have bit off more than you can chew there, Tippia.
I have Bestowers from a few years ago I wasn't looking at jumps when I bought was too lazy to go get them. I paid just under 500K for them. They now go for 1.1 mill.
I just sold 10 Geddons I paid under 50 mill for, I sold for 90 mill in low sec. My Provi, I paid 600 for, sold for 1.33 billion ISK. The list goes on and on. Hull prices are through the roof.
We have had hulkageddons before, though this time I think more people got fed up and just stopped logging in. That said, back to the OP. You won, gratz. Now what? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg-_HeVNYOk
Save Derpy! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
784
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 00:43:00 -
[214] - Quote
Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change.
I think you got severely scammed.
Drake prices were generally flat for a long time except March 2010 (29M) and then started the up trend on Dec 2010 when they hit 29.884M and kept slowly rising since then. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
235
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 01:45:00 -
[215] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change. I was interested in this so I downloaded the EVE-Central data dump for May 16, 2008 and checked the typeid 24698 (Drake typeid from current EVE-Central search, no reason to think it's changed).
I found 237 orders with a minimum of 0.01 ISK (I can't tell what's a buy or sell order in the dump) and a maximum of 45,750,000mil. Average is 31.9mil.
So then, still kind of bored, I retrieved the data dump for May 16, 2007, again checked with a typeid 24698, and found 103 orders with a min of 28,000 ISK and a max of 48mil. Average is 30.8mil.
Now, I'm a masochist, so I downloaded the data dump for May 16, 2006 and ran the same checks but the Drake apparently didn't exist then. 
So, just to stress, it's a one-day sample from a source that probably doesn't have all the data.
Also, I like the new prices regardless, so all y'all haters can suck it. +1 in local |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
520
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 01:52:00 -
[216] - Quote
TravisWB wrote:Tippia wrote:TravisWB wrote:You my dear, are simply blind. Do you even know how to use the price history tab in the market place? You mean that thing that only stretches a year back and which in no way contradicts what I said? Four years ago, I bought my first Drake for the newbie-friendly price of 50M ISK + change. Guess what they cost now? A very anti-noob 50M ISK + change. I do not believe that. I know for a fact that mineral prices 4 years ago were far below what they are now. In some cases such as NOX by a factor of 10X LESS. By extension, things made out of minerals cost far less as well.
I was in that era. Yes, drakes were about 40-50m back then (*plus change as Tippia says*)
Everything was more expensive, and we had less money making power! I was a noob then so I know!
EVE has been getting more and more noob friendly every expansion, not less friendly. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
95
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 02:05:00 -
[217] - Quote
Eaorgan Dax wrote:James 315 wrote:Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. 1 Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. 2 As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. You truly are an idiot aren't you?, you have no clue what you are talking about. Point 1, If mining in high drops further, the price of minerals will go up and the players will start mining again because it's profitable again, all hulkageddon does is restart that cycle over and over and over again. Point 2. Miners have influence over CCP? So, you wanna tell me that's why warp core stabilizers are such pieces of crap and are hopelessly impractical on a mining barge ( it decreases range DRAMATICALLY and you need at least 2 of the freaking things ), so that nobody will ever use them for this, which in fact makes them sitting ducks when something costing 1 10th of the price of a barge, locks, scramble's and shoots them. Time to take off your tinfoil hat mister, if anything, CCP is providing aggressors with more and better tools then it does the industrialists.
Also CCP is FINALLY locking those manifesto threads as the rants they are
http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
465
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 02:09:00 -
[218] - Quote
Minerals definitely did go up in price, but as a high-sec/wormhole pvper (read: non-blob), I find that an extremely good thing.
Ptraci wrote:Ammatar IV wrote: So please, before you decide to gift us with your almighty insight do remember, you probably don't know **** about it. Peace. Confirming I have no nullsec experience. Oh wait - I do. Seriously I thought I was helping you but hey whatever, stay in high sec then if it's so hard to find a decent nullsec alliance. Null-sec is a multifaceted environment that encompasses many more features and variables than your run-of-the-mill carebear alliance experience covers. You are not the ultimate authority on all things 0.0.
And it is difficult to find good null-sec groups, if you are not the type of person who enjoys being told what to do, and following authority without question. A lot seem to be led by the type of people who think that three years of being a sergeant in the military magically qualifies them to lead hundreds of people in an environment that is more reliant on knowledge of memes than real-life military protocols.
Have things changed since wormholes came out? I don't know, since I haven't checked. I'm sure you'll provide some valuable insight on the matter. For now, I'll drive up mineral prices some more. |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1143
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 04:24:00 -
[219] - Quote
In before rant lock. |

Ares Renton
Smoking Minerals Syndicate Cannabis Legionis
41
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 04:37:00 -
[220] - Quote
This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future. |
|

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
524
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 05:39:00 -
[221] - Quote
Ares Renton wrote:This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future.
So say we all! Things are only impossible until they are not. |

knulla
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 06:43:00 -
[222] - Quote
it is way easy to suicide gank, when you can use even a coercer with few SP and alpha a hulk you know something is wrong lol sure they don't fit them great but... that is just crazy.
still I support this, it might force CCP to make mining fun and worthwhile to get miners to mine again after this entertaining abuse, because the ISK is crap as is the "experience". |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 07:15:00 -
[223] - Quote
knulla wrote:it is way easy to suicide gank, when you can use even a coercer with few SP and alpha a hulk you know something is wrong lol sure they don't fit them great but... that is just crazy.
You'd need quite a few coercers to pull that off. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1005
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 07:33:00 -
[224] - Quote
Ares Renton wrote:This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future. Posting to confirm goons are the only alliance in null sec and that CCP literally just throw ISK at them. I personally saw Hilmar slipping at least three fitty dollar notes into mittens' thong last night.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
77
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 09:35:00 -
[225] - Quote
We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion. |

Khadann
First Legion
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 09:53:00 -
[226] - Quote
Karadion Kohlar wrote:We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion.
WTF? |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1007
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 10:16:00 -
[227] - Quote
Khadann wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion. WTF? This is actually true, any goonswarm owned null sec station refines at many times the output of a standard station model.
Some in the past have called this unfair, personally I am of the opinion that since they as an alliance have little in the way of mining operations it is a necessary evil. And good on CCP for being kind enough to introduce such a mechanic to support their goon overlords valued customers.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Karadion Kohlar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 10:58:00 -
[228] - Quote
Khadann wrote:Karadion Kohlar wrote:We currently are being boosted by a patch that CCP released which improves refining skills. So any given item will give out 20 times the output. Since we are one of the biggest ratters in the game within the CFC Alliance, it make sense to give us this bonus as we do not mine. It is only exclusive to members of the CFC & Pandemic Legion. WTF? Problem? |

Phugoid
BHEI Galactic Construction
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 12:28:00 -
[229] - Quote
I think the OP, James 315 is trying his best to become the next The Mittani. Someone needs alot of attention.
I have mined some during Hulkageddon, tho of course with a Covetor and not as frequent as before. But all will go back to normal after Hulkageddon. And I do, do other things in Eve while Hulkageddon is going on.......
I find it very interesting that with all that there is to do in Eve, the OP can only find satisfaction in ganking miners. Meh, we will continue to play the game as we want, regardless of any lame "Manisfesto" by someone needing attention! -áObergruppenfuhrer |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 13:57:00 -
[230] - Quote
Plentath wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Doc Severide wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:I hope every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears. Until they do, I'll be upping my ransom prices on T1 hulls, which are finally worth something. Pathetic... Let's drive away subscribers in droves until there is no one left to pay the bills... Dramaqueen. That's how the game was in the beginning anyway and it was pretty awesome. Yay, sure the 350 people CCP has hired since then will think exaclty the same about CCP losing the income that justifies their paychecks... But, according to your kind, CCP ought to make the game more like the themepark MMOs that are losing subscribers? Okay. Not my kind, I'm not asking for that. It just doesn't make sense to me to wish that "every single high-sec miner rage-quits in tears." Ans no I don't mine, I hate it... |
|

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 13:59:00 -
[231] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Ares Renton wrote:This is the consequence of gladhanding away massive amounts of isk to one playerbase and not another. The goons control the economy and they can use that money to control it even more.
And is CCP going to fix it? No, they're just going to make nullsec even wealthier in the future. Posting to confirm goons are the only alliance in null sec and that CCP literally just throw ISK at them. I personally saw Hilmar slipping at least three fitty dollar notes into mittens' thong last night. OUTRAGEOUS !!!
It was my thong... |

Immogen Telvani
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 14:04:00 -
[232] - Quote
James 315 wrote: In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone!
- 315
Just pointing out that you've missed 2 groups off your list ..
#1] Hi-Sec mission runners. #2] Nul-sec Corps/Alliances that NAP every/any-thing/one around them.
I eagerly await the results of your forth comming war on NulSec/Mission Hubs. |

Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 22:13:00 -
[233] - Quote
James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. Yet the industrialists got roped in big time and way over built hulks believing in goomswarms mission. They saw profits in hulks. Turns out the bottom fell out of the market as the attack was not effective in doing anything other than upsetting morale of the carebears.
Mineral prices are back down that has several orders of magnitude more effect on miners than hulkageddon does.
James 315 is trivial. Goonswarm is slightly less trivial but still ineffective in their mission. Eve lives on.
|

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1703
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 22:21:00 -
[234] - Quote
Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half.
Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts.  |

Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 22:31:00 -
[235] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half. Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts. 
Simple morale failure of those miners they will be back if they have not already. And hulks are so cheap now people are getting into mining that never did it before. Even goonswarmes are training for mining. See posts on page 5 or 6.
But none of this changes the fact that you (James 315) are ineffective in stopping mining even in one belt. |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.18 23:59:00 -
[236] - Quote
TBH, the battle between ganking and mining doesn't have anything to do with how tough (or lack of toughness) Hulks are. No matter how tough you make your Hulk, there will be people who will want to gank you. Let's face it, a top notch destroyer costs about 15 mil to purchase and outfit. An entire squad could dedicate themselves to wiping out a hulk and still come out ahead.
And it isn't about if ganking is 'proper' pvp. It's really about in gameplay mechanics.
Basically, the activity of mining is designed to make miners sitting ducks. Fat, immobile, sitting ducks. We can't mine unless we're rooted to one spot, with nothing to protect us. Heck, with default warp points in the system menu, it's like Eve is designed to make it easier for people to gank miners.
This is completely unlike something like PvE, where most missions occur in deadspace areas where you have to at least enter through a gate, or PvP, where you must use your own (or your friends) cunning to get kills.
I agree that once caught, miners should be easy kills. After all, they're industrial vessels, and even the strongest civilian ship pales in resilience to many military craft. But it should be harder to catch us than *warp to belt...kill...move on*. |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.19 01:53:00 -
[237] - Quote
The OP isn't wrong, to a point (admittedly I haven't read his whole manifesto, there's only so much wall o'text I can plow through in one sitting), but he misses on a few crucial points.
First, he blames the extinction of the nullsec miner on imbalance of the risk vs reward calculation as applied between High Sec mining and 0.0 mining. This calculation is made up of two variables: risk and reward. He focuses solely on reward and blames the high sec miner for unbalancing the equation. Except that HS miners don't control the reward aspect. The market does. In fact, by moving to High Sec, the miners reduced the reward of high sec mining by increasing the supply of High Sec minerals.
Second, he completely glosses over the risk factor. In fact he covers the topic nostalgically, like a conservative wishing for the heyday of the Regan years (or even worse, the '50s). The risk of null sec grew until the nullsec miner was driven out. The reward shrank, the risk grew. You can't blame the prey for moving away from the killing fields, especially if it's not worth their while to stay.
So what does all this mean?
First of all, in order to fix the issues he raises, one of two things need to be done (preferably both). Risk needs to be reduced. Now since CCP can't change the price of Hulks and make them cheaper, they the need to be harder to lose, and thus more miners would be willing to put them at risk.
Second, the reward needs to be increased. Due to the composition of the NS available ores, their value is less than or equal to the value of HS ores. CCP could do this by redistributing mineral compositions in NS and HS space and, if necessary, change the type of ores available in NS belts.
It's easy to blame miners for these problems. It's kind of like blaming Canada. It's easy, but hardly appropriate. Miners only go where the money is. Make NS mining more profitable, and they will come. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
1017
|
Posted - 2012.05.19 02:53:00 -
[238] - Quote
Ditra Vorthran wrote:TBH, the battle between ganking and mining doesn't have anything to do with how tough (or lack of toughness) Hulks are. No matter how tough you make your Hulk, there will be people who will want to gank you. Let's face it, a top notch destroyer costs about 15 mil to purchase and outfit. An entire squad could dedicate themselves to wiping out a hulk and still come out ahead.
And it isn't about if ganking is 'proper' pvp. It's really about in gameplay mechanics.
Basically, the activity of mining is designed to make miners sitting ducks. Fat, immobile, sitting ducks. We can't mine unless we're rooted to one spot, with nothing to protect us. Heck, with default warp points in the system menu, it's like Eve is designed to make it easier for people to gank miners.
This is completely unlike something like PvE, where most missions occur in deadspace areas where you have to at least enter through a gate, or PvP, where you must use your own (or your friends) cunning to get kills.
I agree that once caught, miners should be easy kills. After all, they're industrial vessels, and even the strongest civilian ship pales in resilience to many military craft. But it should be harder to catch us than *warp to belt...kill...move on*. You know why people generally gank hulks and not those 20k EHP mission tengus? Its because mission runners, whilst doing an incredibly boring repetive task, generally don't go AFK. A tengu is worth far more than double the price of a hulk, they can be found everywhere and they already have rats shooting them if you gank them in a mission.
People don't bother because mission runners would just warp off. I think miners could learn from that, this staying at your keyboard strategy sounds like a winner.
Alternatively you could, you know, take those hulks out to low sec and null sec where they belong. Let the genuine new players in coveters and mining frigates mine veldspar without a massive pile of risk averse hulk pilots driving prices down for them.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |

Cunanium
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 03:18:00 -
[239] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half. Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts. 
High sec mining dropped by half? No way. Man you must have killed half the hulks in existence. And those efforts by CCP to ban RMT bots have not been effective at all, even though they have made at least 3 devblogs about their new efforts to root out a source of money they could be ra... I mean receiving in exchange for game time.
Here's some more numbers, 2 months ago CCP banned 150 accounts in one swoop of the ban bat, then in the following 2 days banned another 450ish accounts. These were reported to drive up awareness and make the EVE community aware of a new focus, that of continual banning instead of quarterly banning based on economic data dumps from the game's database. The last estimate I heard was over 30 trillion in isk and assets was removed from game. You are TOTALLY right, this had ZERO effect and your killing of 4000 hulks totally reduced the number of active mining accounts by half.
Just to throw out some numbers, it is typically considered insignificant if the error bound is less than 10% of the measured value. Hulkageddon accounts for 4000ish kills, CCP banned 500 *ACCOUNTS*, so assuming that those 4000 kills resulted in those individuals nerd rage quitting and leaving mining altogether, your efforts are still affected by CCP ban-bat in a significant way.
Mineral prices as a whole have spiked, not just high sec ores, your efforts are focused on high sec miners. How can you effect low/null sec ores and minerals by attacking high sec? The logic is non existent, if anything their prices would drop in percentages not equal to other mineral prices since the restricting factor on ship manufacture will be high sec ores leaving an abundance of low/null sec. However, this is not the case. Null sec ore/mineral price spiked with the high sec ore/mineral prices, suggesting a disconnect between efforts against high sec and the market forces.
Your hypothesis doesn't account for the drop in market prices, however, market prospecting does. Individuals have purchased up significant amounts of minerals to hedge losses from changes in the patch and to gain advantage as the mineral markets are expected to settle at a higher mark with the significant reduction in mining by gun. The purchase of minerals produced a market bubble which was used by some to quantify their efforts at hurting mining, yet the total volume of minerals on market is significantly larger than the volume of minerals produced in the game per month.
Heres the truth of the matter. There exists more in stock piles and reserves of rich players/corps/alliances than can be produced in any short term, ie months. This produces significant lag in the system. The rise/drop in prices is more closely linked to market prospecting by very wealthy individuals about the up coming patch (ie change of looting system...)
Go ahead and continue to believe that your efforts are making more than a drop in the bucket, and I will continue to observe purchases of minerals in the billions from high sec mining corps. |

Redbraids Crafterson
RaVal Thyokill Industies Inc. Intrepid Crossing
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 04:09:00 -
[240] - Quote
Cunanium wrote:James 315 wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with saying, were it not for the fact that CCP Diagoras released official statistics showing the amount of highsec mining dropped almost by half. Sorry, but this is what happens when we have access to facts.  High sec mining dropped by half? No way. Man you must have killed half the hulks in existence. And those efforts by CCP to ban RMT bots have not been effective at all, even though they have made at least 3 devblogs about their new efforts to root out a source of money they could be ra... I mean receiving in exchange for game time. Here's some more numbers, 2 months ago CCP banned 150 accounts in one swoop of the ban bat, then in the following 2 days banned another 450ish accounts. These were reported to drive up awareness and make the EVE community aware of a new focus, that of continual banning instead of quarterly banning based on economic data dumps from the game's database. The last estimate I heard was over 30 trillion in isk and assets was removed from game. You are TOTALLY right, this had ZERO effect and your killing of 4000 hulks totally reduced the number of active mining accounts by half. Just to throw out some numbers, it is typically considered insignificant if the error bound is less than 10% of the measured value. Hulkageddon accounts for 4000ish kills, CCP banned 500 *ACCOUNTS*, so assuming that those 4000 kills resulted in those individuals nerd rage quitting and leaving mining altogether, your efforts are still affected by CCP ban-bat in a significant way. Mineral prices as a whole have spiked, not just high sec ores, your efforts are focused on high sec miners. How can you effect low/null sec ores and minerals by attacking high sec? The logic is non existent, if anything their prices would drop in percentages not equal to other mineral prices since the restricting factor on ship manufacture will be high sec ores leaving an abundance of low/null sec. However, this is not the case. Null sec ore/mineral price spiked with the high sec ore/mineral prices, suggesting a disconnect between efforts against high sec and the market forces. Your hypothesis doesn't account for the drop in market prices, however, market prospecting does. Individuals have purchased up significant amounts of minerals to hedge losses from changes in the patch and to gain advantage as the mineral markets are expected to settle at a higher mark with the significant reduction in mining by gun. The purchase of minerals produced a market bubble which was used by some to quantify their efforts at hurting mining, yet the total volume of minerals on market is significantly larger than the volume of minerals produced in the game per month. Heres the truth of the matter. There exists more in stock piles and reserves of rich players/corps/alliances than can be produced in any short term, ie months. This produces significant lag in the system. The rise/drop in prices is more closely linked to market prospecting by very wealthy individuals about the up coming patch (ie change of looting system...) Go ahead and continue to believe that your efforts are making more than a drop in the bucket, and I will continue to observe purchases of minerals in the billions from high sec mining corps.
I am curious if we could find the numbers of actual minerals moved through the game via trade and compare it to the amount of minerals mined during the same time span. It might be an interesting number with all this talk of markets. |
|

Xpaulusx
V I R I I Ineluctable.
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 04:13:00 -
[241] - Quote
Giving the OP the benefit of atleast possibly being right, even in a worst case senario, most Null Sec Alliances even small ones are quite capable of forming self contained economies, mining, building everything they need to survive. Economic Isolationism. |

Gealbhan
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
145
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 04:26:00 -
[242] - Quote
Anyone that believes hulkageddon is about ridding eve of bots... well, I have a bridge i'm looking to sell, too.
If you look at the bigger picture for a sec you see a few core players maipulating the eve players to bring down ore production so a select few can make a fortune selling their stuff. Quite simple, really and I'll explaine:
If I sold what I have now i'd make about 4bil, not much but I'm waiting to see will it go higher.
Keep shooting those hulks - you're making me money. |

AkaiDruiD II
Jol-Nar Industries Twilight Imperium
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 04:46:00 -
[243] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong. Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead. I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there. The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears. In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone! - 315
oh boy! can I become a gank b!tch pilot killin unarmed ships too. And when I finishing picking on all the children I can fly around on the roids....won't that be fun...
The idiot that came up wit the 'carebear' term should get over his loss of his carebear when he was 2yrs old. It's a dumb term and I'm surprised it's used.
I have an idea for an event; How about every gank b!tch become a valid target anywhere in highsec and no matter what ship they fly, they can only fire their dirty diapers....
Gò¡Gê¬Gò«(Gùú_Gùó)Gò¡Gê¬Gò« |

Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor Federal Consensus Outreach
935
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 05:19:00 -
[244] - Quote
The thing here is that even if hi-sec miners return to their original habits after Hulkageddon, James 315 will never admit that he was wrong. He'll merely say that "more work needs to be done", or that the enemy's resolve was stronger than he had anticipated. At no point would he ever admit that maybe, just maybe, he's wrong, and hi-sec mining is not something that one can actually get rid of.
Sure, he might be right. But he also might be wrong, not that he'd ever admit it. Mane 614
|

Desimus Maximus
State Protectorate Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 05:21:00 -
[245] - Quote
Congratulations dumbass.. You now have to pay more for your own ships/mods/ammo.
|

Gargep Farrow
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 06:18:00 -
[246] - Quote
Miners are becoming gankers? ROFLMFAO The real likelyhood is that they are sharpening their pew pew skills to go after gankers rather than their fellow miners. Gankers could end up becoming a victim of their own sucsess. The OP's opinion seems like it is based way to much on baseless speculation. |

Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor Federal Consensus Outreach
935
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 06:49:00 -
[247] - Quote
Gargep Farrow wrote:Miners are becoming gankers? ROFLMFAO The real likelyhood is that they are sharpening their pew pew skills to go after gankers rather than their fellow miners. Gankers could end up becoming a victim of their own sucsess. The OP's opinion seems like it is based way to much on baseless speculation.
This isn't how gankers work. There's no such thing as a counter-gank. A ganker is already killed by CONCORD and usually the ultimate intent of a ganker is to get as much of his damage as possible done in one volley, as depending on system sec status, you can't be assured of getting another one. The absolute best you could do to counter a gank is have an ECM bird hovering in a belt, but that requires constant vigilance, a good ECM diceroll and assumes that the ganker does not kill in one volley. Mane 614
|

Lord Jeprox
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 07:00:00 -
[248] - Quote
looks like minerals will rocket sky high even more |

Lugaedh
Bluestar Enterprises The Craftsmen
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 07:46:00 -
[249] - Quote
So now the ones controlling 00 can mine happily ever after. Like there is no and has never been botting in 00.
I have been part of the bot grief movement, but there also were miners annoyed of botters. your attitude of saying miners are botters is really simple minded.
But anyway: Thanks for the better prices on high sec minerals. Mining is no real problem, if i want to do it. Mining is a nice way of earning some minerals for production while chatting or using teamspeak or doing some contracting.
I do not understand this arational hatred of people playing the game the way they want to. Yes - mining is boring. but doing it along some other stuff still earns some minerals.
So what?
The Goons are laughing at you and your alikes for working for them to reinforce their grip on the mineral prices...
have fun spitting your wannabe poison :) |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
326
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 08:09:00 -
[250] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong. - 315 Indeed , keep this up and within a year you will have driven out all the miners and industrial minded players and you will have highsec for you alone and there will be. Much celebrating and even more complaining and crying since there is nothing to shoot at and one plex doesn t even cover the price of a single t1 cruiser
Great work Maybe then you will realize how carebear and risk aversion you are These days it seem that losing a ship to gamemechanics you can t beat is prefered than losing a ship in real pvp. To another player
Ooh can you imagine the shame and embarrassment of losing a ship to someone who is better than you and always will be better than you, no losing ships to a game mechanic is so much more less humiliating to ones ego atleast you not ending up on someones killboard
If there is a sad thing about EVE then it is the fact that its own players are killing their own game all in the name of griefing and instant gratification
I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |
|

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1741
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:34:00 -
[251] - Quote
Cunanium wrote:High sec mining dropped by half? No way. Man you must have killed half the hulks in existence. And those efforts by CCP to ban RMT bots have not been effective at all, even though they have made at least 3 devblogs about their new efforts to root out a source of money they could be ra... I mean receiving in exchange for game time.
Here's some more numbers, 2 months ago CCP banned 150 accounts in one swoop of the ban bat, then in the following 2 days banned another 450ish accounts. These were reported to drive up awareness and make the EVE community aware of a new focus, that of continual banning instead of quarterly banning based on economic data dumps from the game's database. The last estimate I heard was over 30 trillion in isk and assets was removed from game. You are TOTALLY right, this had ZERO effect and your killing of 4000 hulks totally reduced the number of active mining accounts by half.
Just to throw out some numbers, it is typically considered insignificant if the error bound is less than 10% of the measured value. Hulkageddon accounts for 4000ish kills, CCP banned 500 *ACCOUNTS*, so assuming that those 4000 kills resulted in those individuals nerd rage quitting and leaving mining altogether, your efforts are still affected by CCP ban-bat in a significant way.
Mineral prices as a whole have spiked, not just high sec ores, your efforts are focused on high sec miners. How can you effect low/null sec ores and minerals by attacking high sec? The logic is non existent, if anything their prices would drop in percentages not equal to other mineral prices since the restricting factor on ship manufacture will be high sec ores leaving an abundance of low/null sec. However, this is not the case. Null sec ore/mineral price spiked with the high sec ore/mineral prices, suggesting a disconnect between efforts against high sec and the market forces.
Your hypothesis doesn't account for the drop in market prices, however, market prospecting does. Individuals have purchased up significant amounts of minerals to hedge losses from changes in the patch and to gain advantage as the mineral markets are expected to settle at a higher mark with the significant reduction in mining by gun. The purchase of minerals produced a market bubble which was used by some to quantify their efforts at hurting mining, yet the total volume of minerals on market is significantly larger than the volume of minerals produced in the game per month.
Heres the truth of the matter. There exists more in stock piles and reserves of rich players/corps/alliances than can be produced in any short term, ie months. This produces significant lag in the system. The rise/drop in prices is more closely linked to market prospecting by very wealthy individuals about the up coming patch (ie change of looting system...)
Go ahead and continue to believe that your efforts are making more than a drop in the bucket, and I will continue to observe purchases of minerals in the billions from high sec mining corps. You sound like you would fit right in with the crowd in Market Discussions, where people who have no information or insight confidently pretend to know everything. If you had bothered to actually read the OP, you would have seen all of your complaints anticipated and addressed, and you would realize how misinformed you are. Apparently you skipped that step.
So let's set the record straight.
As I explained, banning of bots did not account for any of the decrease in mining over the relevant period. You talk about bots being banned months ago. What you fail to realize is that the relevant period for CCP Diagoras' statistics was not a comparison between Hulkageddon and a few months ago, but rather the week preceding Burn Jita/Hulkageddon and about a week into Hulkageddon. There was no bot banning during that period, and no one disputes this.
So right there, your failure to familiarize yourself with the facts has rendered your entire rage-filled post completely moot.
You also pay undue attention to the specific number of the (many thousands of) miners killed by Hulkageddon. You completely failed to account for the much larger impact of miners who stopped mining because of Hulkageddon, and who weren't in the belts to be shot at. You know the old saying--if there are ten crows on a fence and you hit one by throwing a rock at it, how many are left? None, because the others flew away.
As with the bot banning issue, this point was addressed and dealt with in the OP, which you either failed to read or failed to comprehend. Your post did not add any insight whatsoever, and was based entirely on your own faulty assumptions, which were caused and sustained by your lazy refusal to investigate the facts.
In short, you lose. Good day sir. Have fun in Market Discussions, they're waiting for you. |

bongsmoke
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:48:00 -
[252] - Quote
Bots should be banned, period. This shouldn't even be a subject, now hulkaggedon is a little different. I feel bad for a lot of the real miners, being a former miner myself and yes losing 1 hulk to a suicide gank sucks.
I would suggest running missions, salvaging them, and then mining them(while looking out for combat probes). Reprocess all your salvage, youll make money from bounty and its a lot safer than mining in an asteriod belt.
Or could just goto 0.0 in a retriever and mine inpeace, if your familiar with low/null sec mechanics.
Also keep tabs on gankers and their corps, flag them and pay attention to local with your d scan.
CCP wont change anything to make miners life easier, only harder, so find other ways around it.
Get a friend with an orca and dock up if you feel threatened. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
427
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:06:00 -
[253] - Quote
James 315 wrote:As I explained, banning of bots did not account for any of the decrease in mining over the relevant period. You assert, but to the best of my knowledge, CCP Sreegs has *not* said that there were no bans during the period in question. So far as I can tell from the OP - your basing that assertion (and all the conclusions that fly from it) on the thread you linked. Which is not statistics thread from CCP, just players posting their observations... Which may in fact be true, 100% - but they don't account for 100% of the hi-sec systems, so by definition, can't be 100% accurate...
James 315 wrote: There was no bot banning during that period, and no one disputes this. Has anyone from CCP confirmed this?
James 315 wrote:So right there, your failure to familiarize yourself with the facts has rendered your entire rage-filled post completely moot.
You also pay undue attention to the specific number of the (many thousands of) miners killed by Hulkageddon. You completely failed to account for the much larger impact of miners who stopped mining because of Hulkageddon, and who weren't in the belts to be shot at. You know the old saying--if there are ten crows on a fence and you hit one by throwing a rock at it, how many are left? None, because the others flew away.
As with the bot banning issue, this point was addressed and dealt with in the OP, which you either failed to read or failed to comprehend. Your post did not add any insight whatsoever, and was based entirely on your own faulty assumptions, which were caused and sustained by your lazy refusal to investigate the facts.
In short, you lose. Good day sir. Have fun in Market Discussions, they're waiting for you. So . . . How many miners will just return once Hulkageddon is over, and there isn't bounties to be made? My guess is a lot of the gankers will drift away (just like the last 4) and mining in hi-sec by people will return to normal.
You yourself have a few "faulty assumptions".
Edit to add: That thread in C&P is 9 days old, and dealt with Ice Miners... 
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Dragon Outlaw
Rogue Fleet
88
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:10:00 -
[254] - Quote
There seem to be less players logging in the game these days....good job !!! |

bongsmoke
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:32:00 -
[255] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:There seem to be less players logging in the game these days....good job !!!
I would like to thank the goons for this accomplishment, not CCP. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
103
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:58:00 -
[256] - Quote
wait... a James 315 thread thats not 15 posts long O.o
bongsmoke wrote:Dragon Outlaw wrote:There seem to be less players logging in the game these days....good job !!! I would like to thank the goons for this accomplishment, not CCP.
Like the OP said: "it looks like we're winning the war"
The war being ppl logging in.
Goons did say theyre here to destroy the game after all http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
90
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 17:10:00 -
[257] - Quote
The swings in mineral prices seem driven more by speculation than actual input/outputs at the moment. There is enough stored volume for prices to remain detached from actual supply and demand. For now anyway.
The real effect of hulkageddon, at lest in Amarr space, is on ice. If I remember correctly, Macks are right up there with hulks in terms of qualifying for the rewards. Ice started to spike right around the same time Hulkageddon started.
Macks are more vulnerable due to the fact that there are much fewer ice belts than there are asteroid belts. If a lazy ganker wants to gank something, they can easily go to an ice belt to nab a mack...rather than searching a bunch of systems hoping to catch a hulk off guard.
I don't make minerals. I just make ore 20% cooler. |

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 10:23:00 -
[258] - Quote
I don't get it: Is your endgame to get rid of bots, or just to stop all hisec mining forever?
If it's the former, killing all hisec miners is the wrong way to go about this. Even you said in the OP that bots are predictable, and all warp out in sequence when locked. Ergo, your methods are barbaric.
If it's the latter, than YOU ARE A F****** IDIOT. Yes, you WILL stop hisec mining. But you then forget that with no hisec miners, volumes of the lower-level ores will drastically decrease, causing HUGE price spikes. Yes, the current stockpiles will last a long time, and YES there will still be SOME income, but it will all be in losec, where everything will have turned into mass resources wars. Picture what would happen if the real world suddenly ran out of fossil fuels and the only way left to power things were national reserves. Extermination of hisec mining would be that ONE HUNDREDFOLD. Ships would be destroied before they could deliver their payloads, drastically increasing the chance that one alliance could horde all the game's minerals and resources and extort everyone else, requiring a complete reboot of the game. Everyone would have to start from ground zero. Rookie ships all around.
So if your endgame is to eliminate all hisec mining for all time....
Than I hope you like the end of the Galaxy.
Because that's what you'll get. |

Andemnon Kohort
Protagonists Of Doom
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 10:42:00 -
[259] - Quote
John Caligan wrote:I don't get it: Is your endgame to get rid of bots, or just to stop all hisec mining forever?
If it's the former, killing all hisec miners is the wrong way to go about this. Even you said in the OP that bots are predictable, and all warp out in sequence when locked. Ergo, your methods are barbaric.
If it's the latter, than YOU ARE A F****** IDIOT. Yes, you WILL stop hisec mining. But you then forget that with no hisec miners, volumes of the lower-level ores will drastically decrease, causing HUGE price spikes. Yes, the current stockpiles will last a long time, and YES there will still be SOME income, but it will all be in losec, where everything will have turned into mass resources wars. Picture what would happen if the real world suddenly ran out of fossil fuels and the only way left to power things were national reserves. Extermination of hisec mining would be that ONE HUNDREDFOLD. Ships would be destroied before they could deliver their payloads, drastically increasing the chance that one alliance could horde all the game's minerals and resources and extort everyone else, requiring a complete reboot of the game. Everyone would have to start from ground zero. Rookie ships all around.
So if your endgame is to eliminate all hisec mining for all time....
Than I hope you like the end of the Galaxy.
Because that's what you'll get.
Null sec mining pretty much went on unhindered, as far as im aware, hulkageddon only took place in high sec, as all the mining operations i took part in, never left null sec, it's only impact probably drove up mineral values, and the profit margins, having a hulk in null sec is very profitable, even using tech I crystals on the high end ores pays off big time, 100 -400m isk a week is not unrealistic, depending on how many hours a week you can devote to this, and at 2 hrs a day you can mine a huge amount of mineral wealth.. of course only large scale aliances can risk using bots in null sec, i've never used a bot in any case, nor do i shed even a slight tear over those botters who 'lost' their fleets to hulkageddon, in that respect at least, i applaud hulkageddon for ridding Eve of botters, though i do not condone their actions against actual player miners.
the biggest threat to mining at the moment though, isnt actually hulkageddon, but the game itself.. kind of wondering how many miners will unsub, even the null sec ones, and that 'will' have an effect on market prices, more effect than hulkageddon event could achieve in a years worth of activity more than likely. 
|

Janus Nightmare
ECP Incorporated
29
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:19:00 -
[260] - Quote
Holy ****. Are you ********? (I guess mentally handicapped is the preferred nomenclature CPP? xD) Hell, I didn't even know they bothered to resurrect Hulkageddon again.
Yawn. |
|

SwissChris1
Battlestars S E D I T I O N
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:22:00 -
[261] - Quote
Maybe if Hulks didn't cost 300mil they wouldn't be so much fun to gank in highsec...just saying  |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3936
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:23:00 -
[262] - Quote
John Caligan wrote:I don't get it: Is your endgame to get rid of bots, or just to stop all hisec mining forever?
If it's the former, killing all hisec miners is the wrong way to go about this. Even you said in the OP that bots are predictable, and all warp out in sequence when locked. Ergo, your methods are barbaric.
If it's the latter, than YOU ARE A F****** IDIOT. Yes, you WILL stop hisec mining. But you then forget that with no hisec miners, volumes of the lower-level ores will drastically decrease, causing HUGE price spikes. Yes, the current stockpiles will last a long time, and YES there will still be SOME income, but it will all be in losec, where everything will have turned into mass resources wars. Picture what would happen if the real world suddenly ran out of fossil fuels and the only way left to power things were national reserves. Extermination of hisec mining would be that ONE HUNDREDFOLD. Ships would be destroied before they could deliver their payloads, drastically increasing the chance that one alliance could horde all the game's minerals and resources and extort everyone else, requiring a complete reboot of the game. Everyone would have to start from ground zero. Rookie ships all around.
So if your endgame is to eliminate all hisec mining for all time....
Than I hope you like the end of the Galaxy.
Because that's what you'll get.
No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
495
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:35:00 -
[263] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Goons did say theyre here to destroy the game after all
No, no, no, no. Get it right for once.
They are here to destroy YOUR! game.
Sigh....
Who needs television when you have EVE? EVE drama, best drama. |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
492
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:43:00 -
[264] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before.
Goons mining? Please someone post a screenshot, that must be so emberrassing  Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
553
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:54:00 -
[265] - Quote
Y'all don't seem to realize that when ships gets too expensive because of all the miner-ganking, we simply compensate by increasing our ransoms on mission-running corporations. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3936
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:57:00 -
[266] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Malcanis wrote: No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before.
Goons mining? Please someone post a screenshot, that must be so emberrassing 
To quote the goon I discussed it with "Yes mining is still horrible, but 5 hulks pulling in 100M/hr each makes up for a lot" (He was cherry-picking the ABCs in mining anoms and grav sites) Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
171
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:59:00 -
[267] - Quote
I would like to ask what war ? or do you mean the one sided ganking of unarmed ships ?
Tal
|

Samillian
Moonshine Industries The Last Chancers.
160
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 12:28:00 -
[268] - Quote
You know after all the threads on the new inventory system I was actually happy to see this one resurface. Not because I believe a word of the OP's self justifying rubbish but just because it gave me a sense of normality (as far as anything is normal in these forums) returning. |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1741
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:27:00 -
[269] - Quote
John Caligan wrote:I don't get it: Is your endgame to get rid of bots, or just to stop all hisec mining forever? The latter.
Quote:If it's the latter, than YOU ARE A F****** IDIOT. Yes, you WILL stop hisec mining. But you then forget that with no hisec miners, volumes of the lower-level ores will drastically decrease, causing HUGE price spikes. Even if that's true, so what?
Quote:Yes, the current stockpiles will last a long time, and YES there will still be SOME income, but it will all be in losec, where everything will have turned into mass resources wars. Picture what would happen if the real world suddenly ran out of fossil fuels and the only way left to power things were national reserves. Extermination of hisec mining would be that ONE HUNDREDFOLD. None of that sounds like a bad thing for EVE, in fact you paint a rather positive picture...
|

bongsmoke
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:29:00 -
[270] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Malcanis wrote: No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before.
Goons mining? Please someone post a screenshot, that must be so emberrassing 
Please, love to know where they mine.  |
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3937
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:38:00 -
[271] - Quote
Why, in Deklein of course. Where else would they mine if not their own space? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

B3AST MODE B3AST
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:47:00 -
[272] - Quote
Goon space is pretty comfy...I find most of my ships cheaper than Jita prices! LOL SRRY BOUT UR HISEC MINING. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 14:50:00 -
[273] - Quote
James 315 wrote:John Caligan wrote:I don't get it: Is your endgame to get rid of bots, or just to stop all hisec mining forever? The latter. Quote:If it's the latter, than YOU ARE A F****** IDIOT. Yes, you WILL stop hisec mining. But you then forget that with no hisec miners, volumes of the lower-level ores will drastically decrease, causing HUGE price spikes. Even if that's true, so what? Quote:Yes, the current stockpiles will last a long time, and YES there will still be SOME income, but it will all be in losec, where everything will have turned into mass resources wars. Picture what would happen if the real world suddenly ran out of fossil fuels and the only way left to power things were national reserves. Extermination of hisec mining would be that ONE HUNDREDFOLD. None of that sounds like a bad thing for EVE, in fact you paint a rather positive picture...
YOU Mister, doesn't seem to have any sligthes clue about the Eve economy truely works if you favour the totally remove of Hisec mining you only will get alot negative results like as CCP will loose lots of active subscribers, also loose income, so will go down the actual Online numbers also it will raise the prices into Astronomical highs you won't even thing of.
So Mister 'ThenthousandI'mSoCleverBrain' What will this lead to?
I'm telling you.....First less peoples around to play with, second lesser updates and a more stagnant game without expansions within an acceptable timeframe so in this case again more stagnating subscribers.
I'm not sure out of what freaking hole you crawled out but with your assumptions you're seemingly want to see Eve dieying rather then prospering.
Following current happenings....if CCP doesn't steps in and bangs a shoe on the table to get things fixed E.g. Rebalancing Ships especially Miner and industrial ships in a way they'll get a bit higher survive chance against halfhearthed led Ganks i'm foreseeing a more stagnant decrease of player counts within the next half up to one year in a way CCP really will get in some serious payement troubles.
sincerly
Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nepew from the Serpentis Founder ) |

URDEAD2ME
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 15:01:00 -
[274] - Quote
ah the OP is the guy who spends 3 hours bumping one hulk around for a mill isk and calls him self the owner of some npc system ... and then thinks hes best thing since hulkageddon lol |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
553
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 15:14:00 -
[275] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:YOU Mister, doesn't seem to have any sligthes clue about the Eve economy truely works if you favour the totally remove of Hisec mining you only will get alot negative results like as CCP will loose lots of active subscribers, also loose income, so will go down the actual Online numbers also it will raise the prices into Astronomical highs you won't even thing of.
So Mister 'ThenthousandI'mSoCleverBrain' What will this lead to?
I'm telling you.....First less peoples around to play with, second lesser updates and a more stagnant game without expansions within an acceptable timeframe so in this case again more stagnating subscribers.
I'm not sure out of what freaking hole you crawled out but with your assumptions you're seemingly want to see Eve dieying rather then prospering.
Following current happenings....if CCP doesn't steps in and bangs a shoe on the table to get things fixed E.g. Rebalancing Ships especially Miner and industrial ships in a way they'll get a bit higher survive chance against halfhearthed led Ganks i'm foreseeing a more stagnant decrease of player counts within the next half up to one year in a way CCP really will get in some serious payement troubles.
sincerly
Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nepew from the Serpentis Founder ) Contrary to your assumptions, minerals have not always gushed forth with the intensity of water coming through a ruptured dam. The economy had to be built up, in order for it to be coming down.
Are minerals getting more expensive? Sure. Is it necessarily a bad thing? No. Stuff will still be built, and stuff will still be destroyed. There will always be miners. We are simply culling those that are weak and ignorant. And quite frankly, I prefer it this way. When things are expensive, pvp feels less like an inconsequential deathmatch. |

Andre Jean Sarpantis
University of Caille Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 15:21:00 -
[276] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: Contrary to your assumptions, minerals have not always gushed forth with the intensity of water coming through a ruptured dam. The economy had to be built up, in order for it to be coming down. Are minerals getting more expensive? Sure. Is it necessarily a bad thing? No. Stuff will still be built, and stuff will still be destroyed. There will always be miners. We are simply culling those that are weak and ignorant. And quite frankly, I prefer it this way. When things are expensive, pvp feels less like an inconsequential deathmatch.
YOu're such a hardcore PvPer huh? So you're for sure will enjoy the future hardcore Prices as maybe will like as 10 -20 Millions for a T1 frig, 50 -90 Millions for a t1 Cruiser.....150--200 Millions for a simple T1 BC and maybe 350 - 500+ Millions for a simple t1 BS....and those are only the prices will be for non factional ships incoming perhaps.
So Hopefully you SO proud Hardcore Elite PvPers will enjoy your Selfcreated Hardcore ELite Prices 
Sincerly
Andre Jean Sarpantis (Roleplayed Nepew from the Serpentis founder) |

Veflingen
Battle Force Industries Tactical Invader Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 15:44:00 -
[277] - Quote
James, as much as I respect that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, I am amazed that you took the time to write a manifesto yet did not cite ANY source as evidence in favor of your position. No charts. No official documents. No quotes from other persons of note. Now, as you might have guessed I am a carebear yet I have no desire to rid highsec of PvP. If this claim of mine is true that alone invalidates your entire manifesto.
My personal problem with mining in lowsec is that my ship costs around 500mill on todays market (thank you for that, btw), and that it can be taken out so easily that the risk is just not worth it.
Still for what it is worth I applaud your effort to provide an argument to justify ganking miners. I do not agree. |

Chris Cooley
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 15:54:00 -
[278] - Quote
A lot of Eves fame in the real word community comes from its player driven economy/market. Its been mentioned in the Wall street Journal and many other mainstream media sources. Anyone that wants to make that disappear has their head up their assault frig. |

Immogen Telvani
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 16:11:00 -
[279] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Malcanis wrote: No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before.
Goons mining? Please someone post a screenshot, that must be so emberrassing 
They have much experience of 'shooting' things that don't fire back, it's a natural progression.
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
553
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 16:12:00 -
[280] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: Contrary to your assumptions, minerals have not always gushed forth with the intensity of water coming through a ruptured dam. The economy had to be built up, in order for it to be coming down. Are minerals getting more expensive? Sure. Is it necessarily a bad thing? No. Stuff will still be built, and stuff will still be destroyed. There will always be miners. We are simply culling those that are weak and ignorant. And quite frankly, I prefer it this way. When things are expensive, pvp feels less like an inconsequential deathmatch. YOu're such a hardcore PvPer huh? So you're for sure will enjoy the future hardcore Prices as maybe will like as 10 -20 Millions for a T1 frig, 50 -90 Millions for a t1 Cruiser.....150--200 Millions for a simple T1 BC and maybe 350 - 500+ Millions for a simple t1 BS....and those are only the prices will be for non factional ships incoming perhaps. So Hopefully you SO proud Hardcore Elite PvPers will enjoy your Selfcreated Hardcore ELite Prices  Sincerly Andre Jean Sarpantis (Roleplayed Nepew from the Serpentis founder) You have a lack of understanding of basic economics principles. People will exploit opportunities. If mining becomes competitive with other pve activities (it is starting to), then people will brave the increased risks to reap much higher rewards (they are starting to).
If the prices you quoted above ever come to pass, it would mean that ISK has become very common, or that minerals have become extremely rare. Neither will happen if a few thousand high-sec miners quit playing, because their output simply isn't that significant. You are giving high-sec carebears more credit than they are due. |
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
432
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:04:00 -
[281] - Quote
James 315 wrote:More Stuff Just wondered, did you miss Post 250 or are you just ignoring it so you don't have to answer to your unfounded conclusions/assumptions....?
James 315 wrote:You also pay undue attention to the specific number of the (many thousands of) miners killed by Hulkageddon. You completely failed to account for the much larger impact of miners who stopped mining because of Hulkageddon, and who weren't in the belts to be shot at. You know the old saying--if there are ten crows on a fence and you hit one by throwing a rock at it, how many are left? None, because the others flew away.
To go with your "10 crows on a wire" analogy, that leaves 9 miners in station who will be back when it's "safer". I for one (as a former participant in Hulkageddon) don't think Hulkageddon can last all year...
Or to put it bluntly, how long after hulkageddon ends before the miners are back?
dolt.
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
104
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:09:00 -
[282] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Goons did say theyre here to destroy the game after all No, no, no, no. Get it right for once. They are here to destroy YOUR! game. Sigh....
Yes its funny how they walked that statement back...
Its called a lie. look it up
Or do actions speak less loudly than words to only you?
James 315 wrote:John Caligan wrote:I don't get it: Is your endgame to get rid of bots, or just to stop all hisec mining forever? The latter. Quote:If it's the latter, than YOU ARE A F****** IDIOT. Yes, you WILL stop hisec mining. But you then forget that with no hisec miners, volumes of the lower-level ores will drastically decrease, causing HUGE price spikes. Even if that's true, so what?
Pretty much SHOWS the lie in that walkback. He doesnt want to kill bots, he wants all highsec mining destroyed. Yeah THAT wont affect the game AT ALL http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
104
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:14:00 -
[283] - Quote
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote: Contrary to your assumptions, minerals have not always gushed forth with the intensity of water coming through a ruptured dam. The economy had to be built up, in order for it to be coming down. Are minerals getting more expensive? Sure. Is it necessarily a bad thing? No. Stuff will still be built, and stuff will still be destroyed. There will always be miners. We are simply culling those that are weak and ignorant. And quite frankly, I prefer it this way. When things are expensive, pvp feels less like an inconsequential deathmatch. YOu're such a hardcore PvPer huh?
540 kills says yes
especially vs your 0 and 2 losses http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
862
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:15:00 -
[284] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before.
So it's true.
"EvE is a sandbox" they preach.
but then they force people to play their way or the highway. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
511
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:15:00 -
[285] - Quote
I'm just going to pretend I read everything you've written and say that you're overlooking the fact that Diablo 3 was released last week.
Edit: Nevermind, this is a necroed thread.
|

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1741
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:44:00 -
[286] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Just wondered, did you miss Post 250 or are you just ignoring it so you don't have to answer to your unfounded conclusions/assumptions....? The gist of your post is that you're questioning whether CCP has made an announcement that it didn't do any mass bot-bannings during the intervening week before the comparison weeks. Occasionally CCP will make an announcement that it's performed a mass bot-banning, but I can't think of any occasion when it announced "we didn't do a mass bot-banning this week." So it's a silly question from that perspective. Instead, you would be looking for evidence that CCP did perform a mass ban during that week, correct? The burden of proof is squarely on you to support your alternate explanation for the near 50% decline in highsec mining that coincided with Hulkageddon.
Here's some suggestions for you as you go about trying to prove that there was a mass bot-banning during that week:
1. Did CCP announce a mass bot-banning? 2. Did the botter/uncensored forums light up with activity complaining about bans? 3. Was there any anecdotal evidence indicating bot banning?
The answer to all three of these, so far, is a resounding "no." The only thing that happened during the relevant period was Burn Jita and Hulkageddon. Unless you're being willfully ignorant or dishonest, the explanation for the near 50% decline in highsec mining is painfully obvious.
I trust that we are on the same page now?
Quote:To go with your "10 crows on a wire" analogy, that leaves 9 miners in station who will be back when it's "safer". I for one (as a former participant in Hulkageddon) don't think Hulkageddon can last all year...Or to put it bluntly, how long after hulkageddon ends before the miners are back? This, too, was addressed in the OP, which I invite you to read.
Next time please save your gratuitous insults for after you have finished reading/comprehending the OP. Otherwise it looks like instead of asking honest questions, you're just trolling on behalf of carebears and MD pseudointellectuals. 
Unless of course you were just signing your post that way.  |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1741
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:46:00 -
[287] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pretty much SHOWS the lie in that walkback. He doesnt want to kill bots, he wants all highsec mining destroyed. Yeah THAT wont affect the game AT ALL Is this news? I have always said that I want all highsec mining destroyed. And I never denied that the game would be affected by said destruction; quite the opposite. But I believe the effects will be universally positive. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
106
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:46:00 -
[288] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Malcanis wrote:
No, what we'll get is more people mining in 0.0
In fact it's happening already. Even goons are mining now, I know for a fact.
So pack up your Hulk, start looking for a 0.0 corp and prepare to make more ISK than you've seen before.
So it's true. "EvE is a sandbox" they preach. but then they force people to play their way or the highway.
Its not a sandbox cause there are right ways to play it and wrong ones. And NPC seeds Buy Orders etc CCP should really remove that from the description. Its too misleading for ppl.
James 315 wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Pretty much SHOWS the lie in that walkback. He doesnt want to kill bots, he wants all highsec mining destroyed. Yeah THAT wont affect the game AT ALL Is this news? I have always said that I want all highsec mining destroyed. And I never denied that the game would be affected by said destruction; quite the opposite. But I believe the effects will be universally positive.
No.. the lie was Goons saying they wanna destroy your game not THE game. At least you all are admitting it now. http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
58
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:55:00 -
[289] - Quote
Blowing up a defensless exhumer is NOT PVP!!!! |

Andemnon Kohort
Protagonists Of Doom
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 20:59:00 -
[290] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:Blowing up a defensless exhumer is NOT PVP!!!!
PVP doesnt have to be voluntary, or fair..  |
|

I Accidentally YourShip
eHarmony Inc. Brushie Brushie Brushie
173
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 21:37:00 -
[291] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:Blowing up a defensless exhumer is NOT PVP!!!!
It is if it has a player pilot. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3924
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 21:37:00 -
[292] - Quote
technically miners are not pilots.
|

Malphilos
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 21:49:00 -
[293] - Quote
James 315 wrote:[... the near 50% decline in highsec mining that coincided with Hulkageddon.
Wasn't it just a decrease in total m3 for one week compared to one other week? I only saw one tweet, but that hardly coincides with Hulkageddon (still ongoing?) or proves a decline in mining.
|

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
282
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 21:59:00 -
[294] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:technically miners are not pilots.
I'm dissapointed in you ofa ll people for once. That's the silliest statement I've read all day. I think that God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability. In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 21:59:00 -
[295] - Quote
I'll bet that the Inferno patch with the Inventory rework did more damage to Bots than CCP Screegs and his team did. :P |

Fabulousli Obvious
State War Academy Caldari State
284
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 22:16:00 -
[296] - Quote
Ditra Vorthran wrote:I'll bet that the Inferno patch with the Inventory rework did more damage to Bots than CCP Screegs and his team did. :P
And damage to regular players abilities as well. NOT a solution here at all. I think that God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability. In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900 |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 22:41:00 -
[297] - Quote
Fabulousli Obvious wrote:Ditra Vorthran wrote:I'll bet that the Inferno patch with the Inventory rework did more damage to Bots than CCP Screegs and his team did. :P And damage to regular players abilities as well. NOT a solution here at all.
Take it easy man. Why so serious?
I'd suggest a Jita riot except I can't find my ammo...
Just give me a minute. It's around here somewhere...
...
*****
Seriously though, I like it. If nothing else it's a good start to something that can be improved upon.
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
432
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 22:42:00 -
[298] - Quote
Your making this easier than ganking a botting hulk, of which I've killed (for sure, pods kept warping back to the belt...) four. *YOU* are the OP, YOU made the assertions, assumptions and presented your conclusions. The burden of proof is on *YOU*. You have no proof, because you had no facts. I did *not* start the thread - burden of proof is not on me and I called *your* conclusions into doubt, because your proofs were vaporware...
James 315 wrote: The burden of proof is squarely on you to support your alternate explanation for the near 50% decline in highsec mining that coincided with Hulkageddon.
From the OP wrote:I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. A) That is a report of new *ICE* mining bots... B) The report is limited to two or three factual (as much as anything not from CCP) posts, and the rest discussing it or trolling it - so your conclusion that "the mining of ore in hi-sec did *NOT* decline do to a drop in botting" is totally, completely made up. C) Your "Dedicated Bot Watchers" don't seem to be talking about the same subject you were...  D) You also make the declarative statement that "there was *no* mass-banning of bots by CCP - again, burden of proof is on *you* to back up your assertion with fact. The fact is, you *can't*. E) you then try to conflate Ice mining bots, with Ore mining bots (which I will readily agree - not much difference) but again, you have *zero* proof...
From the OP wrote:Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining. This assumption is totally bereft of *any* supporting proof, it is just your "Fox News" spin on something you have no concrete proof of...
Welcome to modern journalism...
James 315 wrote:Next time please save your gratuitous insults for after you have finished reading/comprehending the OP. Otherwise it looks like instead of asking honest questions, you're just trolling on behalf of carebears and MD pseudointellectuals.  Unless of course you were just signing your post that way.  I was asking honest questions. I am still asking honest questions (i.e. prove your assertions) and I still think your a dolt...
p.s. - After four years in game, I really don't give a dam about the carebears (other than as paying subscribers for CCP or as targets for me) or MD discussions. I stay out of Market Discus because I know I don't know enough about the topics at hand to contribute anything worthwhile. I'm here, on the other hand, to call out your BS...
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Sam Flynn
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 23:19:00 -
[299] - Quote
I for one protest the removal of highsec mining ops. THINK OF OTHER PLAYERS!!!! removing highsec mining removes like what 60% to 70% of the industry? that would have major consequences on ship and module construction, thus bloated costs. Lets not make this harder for eve players. This sort thing will be the game's TRUE undoing, a mass exodus of players unsubscribing! Lowsec and nullsec is dangerous enough to risk actually going there, I lost like 60 mill isk on this toon just entering nullsec!!! lets not give lowsec and nullsec trolls an edge, instead lets keep the mining the way it is foir the newbie players and for CCP's sake. After all, EVE is CCP's most played MMO, and the scenario I and several players are just trying to explain would mean the end of CCP AND EVE!!! |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1741
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 23:23:00 -
[300] - Quote
Quote:Your making this easier than ganking a botting hulk, of which I've killed (for sure, pods kept warping back to the belt...) four. *YOU* are the OP, YOU made the assertions, assumptions and presented your conclusions. The burden of proof is on *YOU*. You have no proof, because you had no facts. I did *not* start the thread - burden of proof is not on me and I called *your* conclusions into doubt, because your proofs were vaporware... Nice try. 
Highsec mining declined by nearly 50% after Hulkageddon began. You are claiming that the massive drop in highsec mining was a result of a massive bot-ban during the week before Hulkageddon. The burden of proof to establish this phantom bot-banning is, as I said, on you.
So far, you have provided a lot of whining, but no evidence whatsoever. You have failed to even begin to meet your burden of proof.
If you are not claiming that the massive drop in highsec mining after Hulkageddon began was due to bot-banning, then your entire series of posts is moot. In which case I invite you to contribute something meaningful to the thread. 
Quote:A) That is a report of new *ICE* mining bots... B) The report is limited to two or three factual (as much as anything not from CCP) posts, and the rest discussing it or trolling it - so your conclusion that "the mining of ore in hi-sec did *NOT* decline do to a drop in botting" is totally, completely made up. C) Your "Dedicated Bot Watchers" don't seem to be talking about the same subject you were...  D) You also make the declarative statement that "there was *no* mass-banning of bots by CCP - again, burden of proof is on *you* to back up your assertion with fact. The fact is, you *can't*. E) you then try to conflate Ice mining bots, with Ore mining bots (which I will readily agree - not much difference) but again, you have *zero* proof... Once again, you have entirely misinterpreted the situation.
Since CCP does not announce "we did not perform a massive bot ban this week," the question of whether a bot ban occurred must be presented in an alternate fashion, otherwise you are asking me to prove a negative--even though the burden of proof rests on your shoulders.
Once again, here's how you can provide evidence to support your bot-banning theory:
1. An announcement by CCP that they performed a mass bot-ban during the week in question. 2. Evidence from botting/uncensored forums that people lost their bots. 3. Anecdotal evidence of bot-banning.
Note that I'm being generous by allowing you to include #3. But you haven't even supplied anything from that category.
So I'll challenge you a second time: Provide some proof that a mass bot ban occurred during the week in question, or concede to common sense.
As for my common-sense position, it's informed by the absence of any evidence of bot-banning. Even on the permissive category #3, anecdotal evidence suggests a visible bot presence. (The fact that bots mine ice is, as you say, an irrelevant distinction.) Absent an official announcement from CCP that says "we didn't do a massive bot-ban that week," that's all the evidence you can get that a bot-ban didn't occur--it's a dog that didn't bark--no announcement, no evidence from botters, and no anecdotal bot banning evidence.
To ask for more than that--particularly when there is no evidence to suggest otherwise--indicates you are either willfully ignorant, or you are being intellectually dishonest.
Let me be clear. You can't hide behind statements like "the burden of proof is on you" when all possible proof has already been provided you, and you can't rebut it.
Quote:This assumption is totally bereft of *any* supporting proof, it is just your "Fox News" spin on something you have no concrete proof of... Here, unfortunately, you show your inability to comprehend basic math. I'll make it simple for you:
Total highsec mining dropped by 45.53%. I claimed that a majority (i.e. greater than 50%) of the human mining in highsec dropped. This assumes that the amount of highsec mining performed by bots is at least 9% (100 - [45.53 x 2] ).
9% is an extremely conservative estimate. If I had claimed 50% or 75% of mining was done by bots, you might have a point, since that would be speculative. But even if botters only account for 9% of mining, I am still correct in saying the majority of human mining stopped, since the drop was at least 50% of the remainder--unless your phantom bot ban happened to occur right before Hulkageddon. 
Of course, if you wish to make the absurd claim that botting is less than 9% of the total, you're free to provide some evidence, but I have a feeling you won't be able to deliver.
Quote:I was asking honest questions. I am still asking honest questions (i.e. prove your assertions) No, actually you're not. You're doing either of the following:
1. Making a ridiculous request for an announcement from CCP that they didn't perform a mass bot-ban during the week in question. 2. Being dishonest in a misguided effort to cheerlead for carebears.
Quote:and I still think your a dolt... Your opinions haven't proven to be of much worth so far.  |
|

Sam Flynn
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 23:39:00 -
[301] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Quote:Your making this easier than ganking a botting hulk, of which I've killed (for sure, pods kept warping back to the belt...) four. *YOU* are the OP, YOU made the assertions, assumptions and presented your conclusions. The burden of proof is on *YOU*. You have no proof, because you had no facts. I did *not* start the thread - burden of proof is not on me and I called *your* conclusions into doubt, because your proofs were vaporware... Nice try.  Highsec mining declined by nearly 50% after Hulkageddon began. You are claiming that the massive drop in highsec mining was a result of a massive bot-ban during the week before Hulkageddon. The burden of proof to establish this phantom bot-banning is, as I said, on you. So far, you have provided a lot of whining, but no evidence whatsoever. You have failed to even begin to meet your burden of proof. If you are not claiming that the massive drop in highsec mining after Hulkageddon began was due to bot-banning, then your entire series of posts is moot. In which case I invite you to contribute something meaningful to the thread.  Quote:A) That is a report of new *ICE* mining bots... B) The report is limited to two or three factual (as much as anything not from CCP) posts, and the rest discussing it or trolling it - so your conclusion that "the mining of ore in hi-sec did *NOT* decline do to a drop in botting" is totally, completely made up. C) Your "Dedicated Bot Watchers" don't seem to be talking about the same subject you were...  D) You also make the declarative statement that "there was *no* mass-banning of bots by CCP - again, burden of proof is on *you* to back up your assertion with fact. The fact is, you *can't*. E) you then try to conflate Ice mining bots, with Ore mining bots (which I will readily agree - not much difference) but again, you have *zero* proof... Once again, you have entirely misinterpreted the situation. Since CCP does not announce "we did not perform a massive bot ban this week," the question of whether a bot ban occurred must be presented in an alternate fashion, otherwise you are asking me to prove a negative--even though the burden of proof rests on your shoulders. Once again, here's how you can provide evidence to support your bot-banning theory: 1. An announcement by CCP that they performed a mass bot-ban during the week in question. 2. Evidence from botting/uncensored forums that people lost their bots. 3. Anecdotal evidence of bot-banning. Note that I'm being generous by allowing you to include #3. But you haven't even supplied anything from that category. So I'll challenge you a second time: Provide some proof that a mass bot ban occurred during the week in question, or concede to common sense. As for my common-sense position, it's informed by the absence of any evidence of bot-banning. Even on the permissive category #3, anecdotal evidence suggests a visible bot presence. (The fact that bots mine ice is, as you say, an irrelevant distinction.) Absent an official announcement from CCP that says "we didn't do a massive bot-ban that week," that's all the evidence you can get that a bot-ban didn't occur--it's a dog that didn't bark--no announcement, no evidence from botters, and no anecdotal bot banning evidence. To ask for more than that--particularly when there is no evidence to suggest otherwise--indicates you are either willfully ignorant, or you are being intellectually dishonest. Let me be clear. You can't hide behind statements like "the burden of proof is on you" when all possible proof has already been provided you, and you can't rebut it. 9% is an extremely conservative estimate. If I had claimed 50% or 75% of mining was done by bots, you might have a point, since that would be speculative. But even if botters only account for 9% of mining, I am still correct in saying the majority of human mining stopped, since the drop was at least 50% of the remainder--unless your phantom bot ban happened to occur right before Hulkageddon.  Of course, if you wish to make the absurd claim that botting is less than 9% of the total, you're free to provide some evidence, but I have a feeling you won't be able to deliver. Your opinions haven't proven to be of much worth so far. 
Im with him on this. Removing Highsec mining is a poor choice as SO MANY OF US ARE TRYING TO EXPLAIN!!! |

Grumpy Owly
608
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 23:41:00 -
[302] - Quote
Andemnon Kohort wrote:Ziranda Hakuli wrote:Blowing up a defensless exhumer is NOT PVP!!!! PVP doesnt have to be voluntary, or fair.. 
For PvP and like to encourage more of it? Like to try and get even against nefarious acts?
Want to validate a potential Career path in GëívGëí with new income potential that is ideally designed as simply a transferance of ISK from one pilot to another?
Actually like situations where ships shoot back and "really" improve your KB resume?
You agree that pilots should adapt to challenging situations in GëívGëí where acceptance of risk is an everyday seperator of those getting ahead on the curve?
Or simply want to make GëívGëí less boring?
Support: Bounty Hunting for CSM7.
CCP Design panel wrote: "It's going to be awesome."
"It's absolutley on the list of things to do."
"We have a spaceships game, but you can't be han solo or boba fett, that's not clever."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=_pLi1J9YrkM#t=1199s
Or you could just sit back and complain about being a space pinata? Bounty Hunting for CSM7
Want to know more? ;) |

Zeko Rena
ENCOM Industries
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 23:58:00 -
[303] - Quote
I want to thank you all, there are so many delicous astroids for me to consume in high sec now this is awesome, and using an osprey is a refreshing change, i feel like i am back in 2004, naww to be young again,
The belts are almost as populated as they were back in 2004 with roids as well, very pretty to see a roid bigger than a watermelon  |

Aurelius Valentius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
133
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 00:27:00 -
[304] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:technically miners are not pilots.
Really?... oh, that's right we are... ZOMBIE Pilots!... *passes out some credit default swaps and shoots at some veldspar* it's all about the Frame Rate... |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 00:53:00 -
[305] - Quote
James 315 wrote:
1. Did CCP announce a mass bot-banning? 2. Did the botter/uncensored forums light up with activity complaining about bans? 3. Was there any anecdotal evidence indicating bot banning?
The answer to all three of these, so far, is a resounding "no." The only thing that happened during the relevant period was Burn Jita and Hulkageddon. ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
I love how you come and spout off things you have no idea about. One, yes CCP did announce mass bot banning. Two, the botter forms were completely full of tears for like a month, it was wonderful. I assume one could still harvest quite a few tears on the botter forms today. I am almost positive that CCP even released stats for removed assets from RMT/botters, and it number in the trillions of isk/assets removed. Three yes, a few weeks after all this public banning we began to see a rise in market prices. Makes sense takes the market a while to adjust. Here don't believe me, see for yourself: http://bit.ly/JgnmXp
Educate your self so you don't sound so ignorant. |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1742
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 01:00:00 -
[306] - Quote
Lucy Ferrr wrote:I love how you come and spout off things you have no idea about. One, yes CCP did announce mass bot banning. Two, the botter forms were completely full of tears for like a month, it was wonderful. I assume one could still harvest quite a few tears on the botter forms today. I am almost positive that CCP even released stats for removed assets from RMT/botters, and it number in the trillions of isk/assets removed. CCP Diagoras' statistics were based on a comparison between the week before Hulkageddon, and a week during Hulkageddon. The question isn't whether there have been mass bot bannings in the past, but whether there was a mass bot banning between those two weeks. If not, then the drop in mining from the two weeks compared was due to a drop in human mining (due to Hulkageddon), not from bot banning.
As you said, the botter forums reacted to the bot bannings. If there was a huge bot banning right before Hulkageddon--leading to a drop of nearly 50% in highsec mining!--we would expect some noise from them. But there hasn't been.
So basically, instead of attacking my argument, you're reinforcing it.
Quote:Educate your self so you don't sound so ignorant. Right back at ya, superfly  |

Nick Bison
Bison Industrial Inc Thundering Herd
276
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 01:38:00 -
[307] - Quote
No, the huge bot-ban was right before FanFest. 5+ weeks BEFORE Hulkageddon.
Nothing clever at this time. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
107
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 01:55:00 -
[308] - Quote
Zeko Rena wrote:I want to thank you all, there are so many delicous astroids for me to consume in high sec now this is awesome, and using an osprey is a refreshing change, i feel like i am back in 2004, naww to be young again, The belts are almost as populated as they were back in 2004 with roids as well, very pretty to see a roid bigger than a watermelon 
Screw an osprey, use a covetor lol by the time you get caught, IF you get caught youve made up the cost of it http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.2317/JKES0811.17.1 Bees That Drink Human Tears -- ITS SCIENCE!!! |

Torneach
The Last Bastion
166
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 01:58:00 -
[309] - Quote
Can this thread just die already?
Tired of seeing something reminiscent of 1930s European dictator speeches. |

Ms Bax
Union Of EVE
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 03:55:00 -
[310] - Quote
Just stop feeding this troll. |
|

Large Marg
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 04:10:00 -
[311] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Lucy Ferrr wrote:I love how you come and spout off things you have no idea about. One, yes CCP did announce mass bot banning. Two, the botter forms were completely full of tears for like a month, it was wonderful. I assume one could still harvest quite a few tears on the botter forms today. I am almost positive that CCP even released stats for removed assets from RMT/botters, and it number in the trillions of isk/assets removed. CCP Diagoras' statistics were based on a comparison between the week before Hulkageddon, and a week during Hulkageddon. The question isn't whether there have been mass bot bannings in the past, but whether there was a mass bot banning between those two weeks. If not, then the drop in mining from the two weeks compared was due to a drop in human mining (due to Hulkageddon), not from bot banning. As you said, the botter forums reacted to the bot bannings. If there was a huge bot banning right before Hulkageddon--leading to a drop of nearly 50% in highsec mining!--we would expect some noise from them. But there hasn't been. So basically, instead of attacking my argument, you're reinforcing it. Quote:Educate your self so you don't sound so ignorant. Right back at ya, superfly 
So what kind of noise can players make for using BOTS when its against the rules?
"How dare you ban me for illegal use of a bot! I demand you unban me right this instant." |

Malphilos
State War Academy Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 04:41:00 -
[312] - Quote
James 315 wrote:CCP Diagoras' statistics were based on a comparison between the week before Hulkageddon, and a week during Hulkageddon.
I believe you're mistaken about that.
Which is rather disappointing as you cited the tweet yourself.
|

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:03:00 -
[313] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Quote:Yes, the current stockpiles will last a long time, and YES there will still be SOME income, but it will all be in losec, where everything will have turned into mass resources wars. Picture what would happen if the real world suddenly ran out of fossil fuels and the only way left to power things were national reserves. Extermination of hisec mining would be that ONE HUNDREDFOLD. None of that sounds like a bad thing for EVE, in fact you paint a rather positive picture...
/facepalm
It would drive new players away from the game, and possibly existing ones as well. Believe it or not, the vast majority of people looking to play MMOs like EVE, which run on the high end of the price range due to superior quality, and have no Free to Play option (A good thing, in my opinion), are NOT looking for an all-out killfest. In fact, calling for actions that would leave to massacres in all sectors of space, both high and low sec, would drive away more people than just miners. You're going to drive away the people who like the storyline but not necessarily PvP, but don't mind it's existance. You're going to drive away Incursion runners, RPers, and other groups. If "Carebearing" and highsec mining is akin to sinking EVE, than resource wars equate to dropping a Thermonuclear Bomb on it.
Plus, by calling all highsec miners evil, you really do ignore and insult those of us who mine in hisec just because there's a lot of potential money to be made in them there belts, and who don't really mind if someone comes along and tries to shoot at us because we have drones and also have already aligned to a station like a good miner so we really don't have to worry about ganking from anything Cruiser sized and above. Or just set the drones on T1 frigs. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
555
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 12:07:00 -
[314] - Quote
We don't want miners to leave. We just want the miners who, after getting killed, immediately whine and call for CCP to implement massive carebear protection measures, to leave. |

Futchmacht
TERRA CORE INDUSTRIES
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 13:14:00 -
[315] - Quote
Im a miner.. and all the Goons are doing is making my mining business increase...
years ago before the wide use of high sec bot miners. and in the days before the drone regoins even existed.. ore prices were in some cases higher then they are now.. a raven costed 120 million not 80. becuase mineral prices where higher.
In those times when T2 mining ships didnt exist minerals were also higher priced due to it taking longer to get them our of the belts.
All this is going to do is make mining MORE profitable for the miners that still take the "chance" to mine.
At this point the decrease is actually good for miners.. goons are not the only ones that are making money off this plan lol...
And if goons think they are alone in making money off the distruction of miners in low sec ... lol let them keep thinking that while the miners of eve make more money then they did 6 months ago.
If mineral prices go up 2x or 3x past old prices all that does is make one load of minerals make us more money... and its not like they are ganking the same one player over and over.. they are hitting different systems (or what they know is high miner systems over a few times in a row).
When mineral prices increase to old (3 to 5 year old prices) high sec mining corps will grow in size because noobs in mining ships will be able to make more money then doing missions.
When i started the game mining was THE NUMBER # way to make money as a noob hands down. those days might be on there way back and if so. old school miners like myself who always keep stockpiles of minerals will sell them off and make a good profit doing so.
Even if a ship is lost here and there to gankers. over all most miners or smart eve players will find a way to make more money then they lose. |

ReiAnn
Nova-Tek
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 23:48:00 -
[316] - Quote
I really love how its either carebear this or ganker that...You really have such a small idea of the real picture. It's not about minerals, isk or fun. It's about a select group getting to control the game for the entire group. |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
217
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:15:00 -
[317] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:We don't want miners to leave. We just want the miners who, after getting killed, immediately whine and call for CCP to implement massive carebear protection measures, to leave.
Oh we just want miners to get back into more unarmed ships so we can shoot them some more, we are so leet .
Allow mining ships hulks and such to fit weapons. Enough to be able to take down those brave carebear pvp pilots (what could be more carebear than shooting things that can't shoot back) and allow them to tank a bit more. That would just be natural evolution. |

Vermillion Sands
XaV Enterprises Games of Divinity
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 00:28:00 -
[318] - Quote
@OP Basically alot of shite |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 03:01:00 -
[319] - Quote
ReiAnn wrote:I really love how its either carebear this or ganker that...You really have such a small idea of the real picture. It's not about minerals, isk or fun. It's about a select group getting to control the game for the entire group.
Complete and utter domination of a channel of media is the best fun. Just ask Rupert Murdoch! |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2192
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 04:29:00 -
[320] - Quote
This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness.
Gankers destroy Mining ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved.
Yeah, you're winning the war all right. |
|

EVE Alphonse Elric
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 04:39:00 -
[321] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness.
Gankers destroy Mining ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved.
Yeah, you're winning the war all right.
Wait this guy isnt a Goon, didnt THEY say they wanted to destroy the game? |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2193
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:07:00 -
[322] - Quote
EVE Alphonse Elric wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness.
Gankers destroy Mining ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved.
Yeah, you're winning the war all right. Wait this guy isnt a Goon, didnt THEY say they wanted to destroy the game?
Well, they say they want to ruin everybody's game, which basically will cause players to leave and eventually destroy the game due to no subscriptions.
As for the op, probably affiliated with them in one way or another, either an alt char or ally.
|

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:32:00 -
[323] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness.
Gankers destroy Mining ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved.
Yeah, you're winning the war all right.
And what you are doing here is a slippery slope argument. It is a logical fallacy. Also, we don't want to destroy all miners, just the highsec ones. And we don't want to destroy all mission ships, just the pimped out multi billion is pimpmobile ones. And destroying ganking ships is just silly, how and why would one do that? Also, we dont want to destroy all industrial ships, just the ones hauling cargo out of proportion for the survivability of the ship.
Ultimately, this is all just economic manipulation. We're removing the competition. |

Keno Skir
129
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:39:00 -
[324] - Quote
Nobody has ever mentioned to me in a year of playing, that they have or have seen a miner get ganked. In fact mining seems to me to be a more popular passtime than ever, judging by the number of people i talk to who are miners.
Bots get banned, general population is very down due to summer, diablo 3 etc
OP is trying to bush out his results to fit what he would like them to say. The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:40:00 -
[325] - Quote
Alec Freeman wrote:Dreadknoght Lomaree wrote:You are an idiot if you think that mineral inputs droppng 50% is a good thing...
Where do you think that every ship in eve came from? Every ship that dies in hulkaggedon, the miner & the ganker, costs minerals to build. Now, miners in high-sec bring in the largest total of minerals in eve, and you think this is a good thing? You think miners will want to go into low-sec or 0.0 when all of this is going on?
Yeah, lets see you in a few weeks when ships begin to increase in price 10-fold (which means tens of millions of isk for a single frigate!)
And im not even talking about the destroyed modules prices...
Some men just like to watch the world burn.
Some men just luv2sell mins at high prices. |

EVE Edward Elric
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:48:00 -
[326] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote: Also, we dont want to destroy all industrial ships, just the all of them.
However it is nice to see you arent walking back the "we want to destroy your game" like you pretend it means something other than what was said. That was even sillier than pretending hulkageddon was anything other than tear collection and pretending Helicity isnt a Mittani alt
|

Marcus Caspius
Vitriol Ventures Tribal Dragons
44
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:55:00 -
[327] - Quote
Be careful what you wish for... |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2193
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 06:56:00 -
[328] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness.
Gankers destroy Mining ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved.
Yeah, you're winning the war all right. And what you are doing here is a slippery slope argument. It is a logical fallacy. Also, we don't want to destroy all miners, just the highsec ones. And we don't want to destroy all mission ships, just the pimped out multi billion is pimpmobile ones. And destroying ganking ships is just silly, how and why would one do that? Also, we dont want to destroy all industrial ships, just the ones hauling cargo out of proportion for the survivability of the ship. Ultimately, this is all just economic manipulation. We're removing the competition. No, what I did is post a simple logical progression illustrating the irony of your little Jihad and the resulting outcome if it continues. The only slippery slope here is your reply which in itself is a complete fallacy, not to mention a contradiction and a flat out lie. Other than that, I guess you didn't understand my statement due to it being so simplified. Let me make it a bit more specific, just for you.
This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness.
Gankers destroy Mining ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved.
Yeah, you're winning the war all right.
Alia Gon'die wrote:And destroying ganking ships is just silly, how and why would one do that? Duh, because there's no other player ships left in Eve !!!
And that's the logical conclusion when you eliminate the competition. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
563
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:21:00 -
[329] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:No, what I did is post a simple logical progression illustrating the irony of your little Jihad and the resulting outcome if it continues. The only slippery slope here is your reply which in itself is a complete fallacy, not to mention a contradiction and a flat out lie. Other than that, I guess you didn't understand my statement due to it being so simplified. Let me make it a bit more specific, just for you. This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness. Gankers destroy Mining ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Gankers destroy Industrial ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Gankers destroy Mission ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Gankers destroy Ganking ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions.. What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved. Yeah, you're winning the war all right. Alia Gon'die wrote:And destroying ganking ships is just silly, how and why would one do that? Duh, because there's no other player ships left in Eve !!! And that's the logical conclusion when you eliminate the competition. The two massive holes in your logic (if your drivel can even be called that) are:
1. That that gankers destroy all mining, industrial, mission and ganking (???) ships, instead of just the ones that are improperly fit and/or being flown by imbeciles.
2. That the players piloting said ships will certainly leave if their ships get destroyed. If ship destruction leads to quitting in absolutely every case, then each and every subscription can't be viewed as anything more than temporary, because it is nigh impossible to play this game and not be destroyed at some point.
Yet this game has grown from a few thousand subscribers (and a time when space was indeed much less safe), to what it is today; an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords. |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
563
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:26:00 -
[330] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We don't want miners to leave. We just want the miners who, after getting killed, immediately whine and call for CCP to implement massive carebear protection measures, to leave. Oh we just want miners to get back into more unarmed ships so we can shoot them some more, we are so leet  . Allow mining ships hulks and such to fit weapons. Enough to be able to take down those brave carebear pvp pilots (what could be more carebear than shooting things that can't shoot back) and allow them to tank a bit more. That would just be natural evolution. You can make a special exemption for high-sec miners to be allowed to fly titans without any restrictions, and they will still fill every high slot with strips and every low with yield mods and cargo expanders.
It's not about ship stats, and never has been; it's about attitude. |
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1018
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:31:00 -
[331] - Quote
i don't want to play in a world where a newbie mining veld in a retriever can actually make a decent profit |

Tub Chil
Heretic University Heretic Nation
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:43:00 -
[332] - Quote
Mining is abomination and it should seize to exist as a game mechanics. |

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
234
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:43:00 -
[333] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:i don't want to play in a world where a newbie mining veld in a retriever can actually make a decent profit
Then quit. You want fries with that? |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
563
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:51:00 -
[334] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:i don't want to play in a world where a newbie mining veld in a retriever can actually make a decent profit Then quit. There's always that other option... |

Kara Vix
Vinegar Flies Peregrine Nation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 07:55:00 -
[335] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:Mining is abomination and it should seize to exist as a game mechanics.
Well the word you wanted was 'cease' but your entire opinion is idiotic so I guess your choice of words is academic. |

Tub Chil
Heretic University Heretic Nation
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 08:07:00 -
[336] - Quote
Kara Vix wrote:Tub Chil wrote:Mining is abomination and it should seize to exist as a game mechanics. Well the word you wanted was 'cease' but your entire opinion is idiotic so I guess your choice of words is academic. yes thank you I wanted to use this |

Kara Vix
Vinegar Flies Peregrine Nation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 08:13:00 -
[337] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:Kara Vix wrote:Tub Chil wrote:Mining is abomination and it should seize to exist as a game mechanics. Well the word you wanted was 'cease' but your entire opinion is idiotic so I guess your choice of words is academic. yes thank you I wanted to use this
No charge You should realize though that mining is one of the driving factors of Eve. Everything derives from the minerals it produces and pvp occurs from corps fighting over the more precious sources. It is fundamental to the game so wanting it to cease as a mechanic is rather a poorly thought out idea. |

Tub Chil
Heretic University Heretic Nation
22
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 08:29:00 -
[338] - Quote
Kara Vix wrote:Tub Chil wrote:Kara Vix wrote:Tub Chil wrote:Mining is abomination and it should seize to exist as a game mechanics. Well the word you wanted was 'cease' but your entire opinion is idiotic so I guess your choice of words is academic. yes thank you I wanted to use this No charge  You should realize though that mining is one of the driving factors of Eve. Everything derives from the minerals it produces and pvp occurs from corps fighting over the more precious sources. It is fundamental to the game so wanting it to cease as a mechanic is rather a poorly thought out idea. I know but... why is it so horrible? |

Kara Vix
Vinegar Flies Peregrine Nation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 08:36:00 -
[339] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:Kara Vix wrote:Tub Chil wrote:Kara Vix wrote:Tub Chil wrote:Mining is abomination and it should seize to exist as a game mechanics. Well the word you wanted was 'cease' but your entire opinion is idiotic so I guess your choice of words is academic. yes thank you I wanted to use this No charge  You should realize though that mining is one of the driving factors of Eve. Everything derives from the minerals it produces and pvp occurs from corps fighting over the more precious sources. It is fundamental to the game so wanting it to cease as a mechanic is rather a poorly thought out idea. I know but... why is it so horrible?
I can't help you there. There are merits to most arguements made by people of both sides of the issue of high sec mining and ganking. I do think CCP needs to be more vocal about the issue as it is creating a divide amongst the player base that may become unrecoverable if they remain silent. PVPers need to realize that this game needs the PVE'ers to survive and some PVE'ers need to realize that PVP is also the heart of the game. It is a shame that the forums do not act as a place to interact on the subject and get the pulse of the community though, since there are a few dozen entitled posters who feel they own the forums and that anyone who disagrees with their ill thought ideas are just fodder for insults (you know who you are) and threads degenerate quickly. |

Pisov viet
Kaesong Kosmonauts Test Alliance Please Ignore
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 08:59:00 -
[340] - Quote
Quote:
Gankers destroy Mining ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Industrial ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Mission ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Gankers destroy Ganking ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game.
Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions..
I can spout facts out of my ass too:
People leaving eve after getting ganked would have left the game anyway upen getting scammed, can flipped or accidently jumping in lowsec. |
|

Red Rydah
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
28
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 09:06:00 -
[341] - Quote
Didn't know we were at war against miners. What did they do? Invade a belt? Harbor weapons of mass escavation?
Oh yes, yes, yes, we must deal with these pesky miners before they destroy our very way of life!
For our children!
RR |

Francisco Bizzaro
128
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 09:10:00 -
[342] - Quote
Kara Vix wrote:No charge  You should realize though that mining is one of the driving factors of Eve. Everything derives from the minerals it produces and pvp occurs from corps fighting over the more precious sources. It is fundamental to the game so wanting it to cease as a mechanic is rather a poorly thought out idea. All the more reason for mining to be a challenging profession rather than a PVE "I win" button. Corporations and players who recognize the importance of minerals will develop creative ways to get the job done, and deserve to succeed over their less creative peers. Eve should reward these active, thinking players, and not have the basis of its economy placed at the mercy of AFK hulk pilots who don't understand their middle slots. |

Kara Vix
Vinegar Flies Peregrine Nation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 09:21:00 -
[343] - Quote
Francisco Bizzaro wrote:Kara Vix wrote:No charge  You should realize though that mining is one of the driving factors of Eve. Everything derives from the minerals it produces and pvp occurs from corps fighting over the more precious sources. It is fundamental to the game so wanting it to cease as a mechanic is rather a poorly thought out idea. All the more reason for mining to be a challenging profession rather than a PVE "I win" button. Corporations and players who recognize the importance of minerals will develop creative ways to get the job done, and deserve to succeed over their less creative peers. Eve should reward these active, thinking players, and not have the basis of its economy placed at the mercy of AFK hulk pilots who don't understand their middle slots.
A valid point. But how do you get around large alliances like Goons (for example, not flaming them so to speak) who have become so large that they could steamroll anyone in their path and control all of New Eden. There needs to be room for the 'small guy' to succeed. I think that by having the more precious minerals in null sec as it is now achieves this. The small time miners in high sec drinking their coffee and chatting with friends while mining Veldspar is not monopolizing the economy but providing a steady supply of the common minerals and allowing a rewarding style of gameplay for non pvp'ers. There is room in the game for both types of gameplay. (for disclosure I neither mine nor pvp, I am a mission runner only but am prepared to defend myself as I know that pvp can happen anywhere anytime) |

Francisco Bizzaro
128
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 10:02:00 -
[344] - Quote
Kara Vix wrote:Francisco Bizzaro wrote:Kara Vix wrote:No charge  You should realize though that mining is one of the driving factors of Eve. Everything derives from the minerals it produces and pvp occurs from corps fighting over the more precious sources. It is fundamental to the game so wanting it to cease as a mechanic is rather a poorly thought out idea. All the more reason for mining to be a challenging profession rather than a PVE "I win" button. Corporations and players who recognize the importance of minerals will develop creative ways to get the job done, and deserve to succeed over their less creative peers. Eve should reward these active, thinking players, and not have the basis of its economy placed at the mercy of AFK hulk pilots who don't understand their middle slots. A valid point. But how do you get around large alliances like Goons (for example, not flaming them so to speak) who have become so large that they could steamroll anyone in their path and control all of New Eden. The goons are nowhere near big enough to control all of New Eden, or even a portion of a wide-spread and heterogeneous market such as minerals and belt mining.
Quote: There needs to be room for the 'small guy' to succeed. There's already too much room for the small guy to succeed. If you can afford a hulk and then fly it semi-AFK towards profit, then it is too easy. The kill boards suggest that this type of flying is still profitable, otherwise we would not be seeing so many untanked hulks within 5 jumps of Jita. There's already plenty of opportunity for the small guy who breaks out of that pattern.
Quote: I think that by having the more precious minerals in null sec as it is now achieves this. The small time miners in high sec drinking their coffee and chatting with friends while mining Veldspar is not monopolizing the economy but providing a steady supply of the common minerals and allowing a rewarding style of gameplay for non pvp'ers. There is room in the game for both types of gameplay. (for disclosure I neither mine nor pvp, I am a mission runner only but am prepared to defend myself as I know that pvp can happen anywhere anytime)
Drinking coffee is great, I'm doing it now, but it doesn't require me to fly a hulk and earn max-yield profits. I think it's fair enough to expect that if people want to be optimal at a given job they should actually be playing the game at a high level. If someone wants to play casual, that's cool, but then what's the problem with casual levels of profit? Eve provides many options which make you far less of a target and thus almost completely safe even in these dark days of ganking - and even that can be achieved at probably 80% of the yield of an optimized hulk, so pretty good money for drinking coffee and chatting.
|

TigerXtrm
Cadre Assault Force Initiative Mercenaries
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 10:09:00 -
[345] - Quote
So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz? |

Kara Vix
Vinegar Flies Peregrine Nation
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 10:23:00 -
[346] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz?
Seems some players feel that their style of play is the only that is valid and that any who disagree should move on, or die. I truly think these forum fighters would see EVE fail as a game rather than let others enjoy it in a manner they disagree with (ie: miners, carebears). |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
219
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 11:57:00 -
[347] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:We don't want miners to leave. We just want the miners who, after getting killed, immediately whine and call for CCP to implement massive carebear protection measures, to leave. Oh we just want miners to get back into more unarmed ships so we can shoot them some more, we are so leet  . Allow mining ships hulks and such to fit weapons. Enough to be able to take down those brave carebear pvp pilots (what could be more carebear than shooting things that can't shoot back) and allow them to tank a bit more. That would just be natural evolution. You can make a special exemption for high-sec miners to be allowed to fly titans without any restrictions, and they will still fill every high slot with strips and every low with yield mods and cargo expanders. It's not about ship stats, and never has been; it's about attitude.
Some of it is attitude some it is game mechanics. Hulks should be harder to kill than they currently are and should be allowed to defend themselves against a certain amount of agro. Make the slot limited to small/medium guns/missiles only. I know some miners that would love to have some ability to defend themselves especially against destroyer ganks. At the moment the balance in Eve is definatly in the favour of the griefer.
Tal |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
58
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:00:00 -
[348] - Quote
And if that many miners and High Sec industrialists quit, there goes a lot of CCP employees.
The fact that we hated Incarna last year cost CCP employees 120 jobs. 20% of their workforce. That's not something to joke post about tbh. Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

El Puerco
Abh Academy Abh Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:04:00 -
[349] - Quote
Business has never been better :D thanks for killing my competition. Errare humanum est. |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
58
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:10:00 -
[350] - Quote
Kara Vix wrote:
Seems some players feel that their style of play is the only that is valid and that any who disagree should move on, or die. I truly think these forum fighters would see EVE fail as a game rather than let others enjoy it in a manner they disagree with (ie: miners, carebears).
The goons announced years ago that they came to ruin the game. YOUR game specifically.
So, here we are.......... Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |
|

Arras Denard
Etoilles Mortant Ltd. Solyaris Chtonium
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:22:00 -
[351] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. Umm, I have never stopped mining in my hulk in highsec. Your amazing talent for overstatement is to be commended however. 
|

Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
68
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:33:00 -
[352] - Quote
Kara Vix wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz? Seems some players feel that their style of play is the only that is valid and that any who disagree should move on, or die. I truly think these forum fighters would see EVE fail as a game rather than let others enjoy it in a manner they disagree with (ie: miners, carebears).
I agree 10000%. The sad part is that the 'you're playing the game wrong' crowd will never admit their faults, for lack of a better word. |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2197
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:40:00 -
[353] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:No, what I did is post a simple logical progression illustrating the irony of your little Jihad and the resulting outcome if it continues. The only slippery slope here is your reply which in itself is a complete fallacy, not to mention a contradiction and a flat out lie. Other than that, I guess you didn't understand my statement due to it being so simplified. Let me make it a bit more specific, just for you. This 'Genocide' that you're calling for is nothing more than a deliberate and systematic destruction of this game. So let's review this madness. Gankers destroy Mining ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Gankers destroy Industrial ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Gankers destroy Mission ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Gankers destroy Ganking ships not affiliated with their Alliance resulting in those players leaving the game. Eve Online becomes Eve Offline due to no more player subscriptions.. What you're doing is called MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) = Effectively resulting in the complete annihilation of everyone involved. Yeah, you're winning the war all right. Alia Gon'die wrote:And destroying ganking ships is just silly, how and why would one do that? Duh, because there's no other player ships left in Eve !!! And that's the logical conclusion when you eliminate the competition. The two massive holes in your logic (if your drivel can even be called that) are: 1. That the gankers destroy all mining, industrial, mission and ganking (???) ships, instead of just the ones that are improperly fit and/or being flown by imbeciles. 2. That the players piloting said ships will certainly leave if their ships get destroyed. If ship destruction leads to quitting in absolutely every case, then each and every subscription can't be viewed as anything more than temporary, because it is nigh impossible to play this game and not be destroyed at some point. Yet this game has grown from a few thousand subscribers (and a time when space was indeed much less safe), to what it is today;
Ahhh, since you don't understand satiric irony based on simple logic you decide to call it drivel.
1. After all the improperly fitted ships are destroyed, the only ones left to gank are the properly fitted ships. Simple logic.
2. Players who have their ships repeatedly ganked will most definitely leave due to not being able to participate in an activity they enjoy. Simple logic.
Stating that the player base has continuously grown since the game was first implemented is incorrect.
http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility
From 2006 to 2008 the game had a steady gradual increase of active players. During the whole year of 2008 that amount leveled off. In the first half of 2009 there was quick growth, then in the middle of 2009 there was a huge drop that leveled out for 6 months. That is the longest stretch of time with a steady low amount of players making it the low base reference point ..Since then, growth has been sporadic and short term followed by a large initial drop and a long steady decrease in player numbers each time. The current amount of active players now online is less than what it was in the middle of 2009.
Also back in the early years it was indeed much safer due to the low amount of active players online. I will agree with you on one point, this game has definitely become "an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords" who think suicide ganking a bunch of Industrial ships makes them elite PvP's. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3968
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:58:00 -
[354] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz?
Maybe enouraging that "primary source" to see that there's far more ore than they ever dreamed of, just waiting for them, in space that's actually safer? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2201
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:00:00 -
[355] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: Maybe enouraging that "primary source" to see that there's far more ore than they ever dreamed of, just waiting for them, in space that's actually safer?
And what space would that be? |

Slaphead Dave
Vindaloovian Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:08:00 -
[356] - Quote
i believe that people should do whatever turns them on, end of the day, the sandbox factor of the game is what drives us to become and do anything , for every bad turn there is allways a ballance, for those miners our there who feel under pressure, dont fret just get out there and do what you do best, perhaps even mine in groups again with friends like in the days olf olde, grow some teeth and try to fend off threats perhaps with a 2nd account and a cloaked supprise who knows, point is there is allways a way arround the problem.
as people have said prices will suffer if miners stop, the market will stagnate and as a result will revert to those with large stockpiles. - not good for all!
go out there, do your mineing, take precatutions.
You guys doing the ganking should do the same, get out there find botters as apose to miners however! the botting should be the enemy not the passtime of mining! |

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
149
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:14:00 -
[357] - Quote
Quote: From 2006 to 2008 the game had a steady gradual increase of active players. During the whole year of 2008 that amount leveled off. In the first half of 2009 there was quick growth, then in the middle of 2009 there was a huge drop that leveled out for 6 months. That is the longest stretch of time with a steady low amount of players making it the low base reference point ..Since then, growth has been sporadic and short term followed by a large initial drop and a long steady decrease in player numbers each time. The current amount of active players now online is less than what it was in the middle of 2009.
Also back in the early years it was indeed much safer due to the low amount of active players online. I will agree with you on one point, this game has definitely become "an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords" who think suicide ganking a bunch of Industrial ships makes them elite PvP's.
CCP perpetuates the myth that the player base continually grows in order to appear healthier than it is. Supposedly there are 400k subs now, even though the online numbers have been declining for a while. It's good to see real data to confirm the trend downward. Given all the free subscription deals that CCP uses, I don't doubt that the number of subs is higher. But Eve has never been good at retaining new players. In my old corp we had to recruit 5 newbie players for every 1 that we kept.
The fake hatred of miners is all about justifying ganking as real PVP, when it isn't. There is an adrenaline rush that comes with harming a real player, and ganker types become addicted to that. But if the only thing that satisfies you in the game is that adrenaline, then you're basically after a game experience that's more like a drug high than anything real.
The whole concept of MMOs is getting tested by the fact that they're all aging and having a hard time keeping players interested. Eve has found a couple of formulas that work but they are at war with each other. The PVP sandbox and the industrialist sandbox are in conflict with each other. Too many people on the forums think that it's only the PVP possibilities that keep people in the game, but a lot of people play Eve long term for the complex economy and the intricacy of making things. Those people are being driven out of the game by the miner jihad mentality. |

Amber Solaire
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:36:00 -
[358] - Quote
MadMuppet wrote:It is still too soon to tell anything. If it rained for three days in a row I swear half the forum whiners on here would be building an ark and begin collecting two of every creature that lives with them in their parent's basement. If it didn't rain for three days they would be screaming global warming, demand a larger tank to store water, and die of dehydration from all the tears they shed.
They are the goldfish of Eve, swimming around New Eden bumping in to mirrors and screaming at themselves for being in the way because their short term memory is about thirty seconds. Like little yapping boot polishing toy-breed dogs they serve little purpose but to make noise, **** the carpets, and on an extremely rare occasion manage to disrupt or kill a much larger dog by getting caught in its throat.
You need to give it time. The Eve economy is a process, not a single act. You need to understand that every change needs time to gestate before coming to fruition. One human can make one baby in nine months. The forum whiners believe that if nine people work together (the Goons) they can make the baby happen in one month. The actual long term effects will still take nine months. In those same nine months you can make a baby of your own, but you want it in two weeks. Unless your last name is Jolie, it probably isn't going to magically appear.
The biggest whiners are not the miners, but the PvPers........ |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3968
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:37:00 -
[359] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Also back in the early years it was indeed much safer due to the low amount of active players online...

Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 13:54:00 -
[360] - Quote
Slaphead Dave wrote:
You guys doing the ganking should do the same, get out there find botters as apose to miners however! the botting should be the enemy not the passtime of mining!
I had an alt that specifically ganked botting Ice Miners. Too bad he won't be playing anymore. Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |
|

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 14:00:00 -
[361] - Quote
Ban Bindy wrote:The fake hatred of miners is all about justifying ganking as real PVP, when it isn't. There is an adrenaline rush that comes with harming a real player, and ganker types become addicted to that. But if the only thing that satisfies you in the game is that adrenaline, then you're basically after a game experience that's more like a drug high than anything real.
My thoughts exactly.
I have no problem steamrolling Genghis Khan in Civ 5, or shooting everything in sight in an FPS. AI's do not bother me at all (if they did, please commit me).
But when a player is behing the 'fictional' character, something else enter into it. I KNOW how hard EVE is and how difficult it is to learn enough to get really established. It's a different game at the 2 year mark than as a noob. Vastly different. And I need a REALLY GOOD REASON before I feel like just 'disrupting someone's day'. (And yes, all of this is moot in Low and Null btw).
And it's pathetic how they try to dance around the word "BULLYING".
Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

GFL Kalor
Shadow Council
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 14:15:00 -
[362] - Quote
I have live in Hi-Sec and Lo-Sec at various times since the launch of Eve Beta. Trying to get the majority of pilots into lo-sec or null sec is stupid. Nurf this, patch that, make it harder and harder for people in hi-sec to make any real isk and it will drive them into lo-sec. Here's a news flash for you CCP. We will just leave the game and go to something else. Eve use to be pretty evenly balanced between hi and lo-sec, meaning you could make pretty good iskies in either area. Granted ABC ores were all in lo-sec, but pilots still made a decent living in hi-sec. The last expansion did nothing to maintain that balance. Now if you want to make any real isk you need to be in low or null sec. Thanks for nothing CCP. |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 14:20:00 -
[363] - Quote
GFL Kalor wrote:I have live in Hi-Sec and Lo-Sec at various times since the launch of Eve Beta. Trying to get the majority of pilots into lo-sec or null sec is stupid. Nurf this, patch that, make it harder and harder for people in hi-sec to make any real isk and it will drive them into lo-sec.
I was doing Low Sec PI over a year with 4 Toons till they introduced POCO's so that the Goons would have another source of ISK from the Taxes.
So, I'm not sure if even trying to get High Seccers into Low or Null is a real 'campaign'. They keep slapping the possibilities down. Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 15:18:00 -
[364] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:The two massive holes in your logic (if your drivel can even be called that) are:
1. That the gankers destroy all mining, industrial, mission and ganking (???) ships, instead of just the ones that are improperly fit and/or being flown by imbeciles.
2. That the players piloting said ships will certainly leave if their ships get destroyed. If ship destruction leads to quitting in absolutely every case, then each and every subscription can't be viewed as anything more than temporary, because it is nigh impossible to play this game and not be destroyed at some point.
Yet this game has grown from a few thousand subscribers (and a time when space was indeed much less safe), to what it is today; an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords.
But there's your problem!!! How do you tell which ships are properly fitted and which aren't?!? You can't descriminate through that regard. By that logic, if I take a well-fitted Drake, and I see a rookie ship, I might decide that it's "improperly fitted" because it couldn't sink me if it tried, and shoot it down. Also, if you want to prove a point that a ship is improperly fitted, take him down to just over 1 structure point, and then tell the pilot what he or she needs to fix to get a better fit. Some people can't necessarily afford to fit their ship well, so you have to take that kind of thing into consideration.
Also, ganking new players is not a good way to keep them subscribed. People generally tend to stop playing MMO's if the first thing that happens to them is being blown up in an area supposedly safe from PvP |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 15:19:00 -
[365] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz?
The Goons quite loudly announced years ago they came in here to ruin the game.
This is the fruit of their endeavor. Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

Karn Dulake
Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance
798
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 15:55:00 -
[366] - Quote
So do we win when there is no one left in the game?
Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion. |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
65
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:00:00 -
[367] - Quote
Karn Dulake wrote:So do we win when there is no one left in the game?
Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are
VC is whoever brings the most 'content' I think. Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

ReiAnn
Nova-Tek
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:50:00 -
[368] - Quote
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:Karn Dulake wrote:So do we win when there is no one left in the game?
Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are VC is whoever brings the most 'content' I think.
If this is the highlight of 'eve content', then I seriously want my money back. There are phone apps with more storyline. |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
65
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:55:00 -
[369] - Quote
ReiAnn wrote:
If this is the highlight of 'eve content', then I seriously want my money back. There are phone apps with more storyline.
Watch the Fanfest Vidoe Footage and watch CCP and the SONY Rep PRAISE the Goons. "They bring great content. You guys REALLY do it." Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

Keno Skir
136
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:31:00 -
[370] - Quote
I loved how dangerous this game felt when i first started. It isn't actually quite like that though. So aside from the inflation (which lets face it is affecting the gankers too) i quite like that its actually a bit dangerous in hisec. Miners should be made aware more of the dangers and how to avoid them, rather than dumbing down the game to keep miners safe.
This is a sandbox, but also a loose approximation of a lawless (almost) new frontier. Be the brave space captain, not Arnold fecking Rimmer. Learn of the dangers of your new world and master them, don't snivel until daddy makes them stop kicking sand at you.
Some people get ganked all the time, and some never do. There is a reason for this i think, and it seems to do with peoples ability to adapt and learn to survive. As should be the case in a world like New Eden  The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
|

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
621
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:46:00 -
[371] - Quote
De see me mining.... they hatin. trying to catch my hulk afkin t |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:47:00 -
[372] - Quote
Keno Skir wrote: Learn of the dangers of your new world and master them, don't snivel until daddy makes them stop kicking sand at you.
The Casual Player has not the time for that kind of operation which at this point would have to be rather massive.
Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
564
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:03:00 -
[373] - Quote
John Caligan wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:The two massive holes in your logic (if your drivel can even be called that) are:
1. That the gankers destroy all mining, industrial, mission and ganking (???) ships, instead of just the ones that are improperly fit and/or being flown by imbeciles.
2. That the players piloting said ships will certainly leave if their ships get destroyed. If ship destruction leads to quitting in absolutely every case, then each and every subscription can't be viewed as anything more than temporary, because it is nigh impossible to play this game and not be destroyed at some point.
Yet this game has grown from a few thousand subscribers (and a time when space was indeed much less safe), to what it is today; an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords. But there's your problem!!! How do you tell which ships are properly fitted and which aren't?!? You can't descriminate through that regard. Uh, we have something called "passive targeters" and "ship scanners." No, really! Come on, you can't not believe me; just look in the market for yourself!
John Caligan wrote:By that logic, if I take a well-fitted Drake, and I see a rookie ship, I might decide that it's "improperly fitted" because it couldn't sink me if it tried, and shoot it down. Well, enjoy losing your Drake to CONCORD for the satisfaction of killing a rookie ship that the guy will just get another copy of when he docks at the closest station.
John Caligan wrote:Also, if you want to prove a point that a ship is improperly fitted, take him down to just over 1 structure point, and then tell the pilot what he or she needs to fix to get a better fit. And when I play CoD, I'll shoot at the enemy's leg to get him down to low health, after which I'll stop shooting and offer him to surrender. In a nice game of ball, I'll aim my shots to only go near the basket/goal/hole, and then tell the opposing team that they need to play better.
We wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings in a competitive gaming environment, would we now? Scoring a goal in soccer (football to the European barbarians) might make the opposing team stop playing, and then no one will play soccer anymore. :(
John Caligan wrote:Some people can't necessarily afford to fit their ship well, so you have to take that kind of thing into consideration.
Also, ganking new players is not a good way to keep them subscribed. People generally tend to stop playing MMO's if the first thing that happens to them is being blown up in an area supposedly safe from PvP There's a difference between not being able to afford expensive fittings, and not being able to rub two brain cells together to fit properly. Also, where the hell do you get off calling Hulk pilots new players? New players don't fly 250+ million ships. |

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:52:00 -
[374] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong. Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead. I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there. The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears. In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone! - 315 I'm a carebear of 4 years... and not a single f*** was given that day.
If people actually quit because of a flotilla of losers sitting behind keyboards with over-inflated internet egos take the time to develop useless drivel like this, that just shows how weak-minded they all are. Go ahead and let them quit.
People seem to forget that EVE is a game no matter how realistic things seem to be. I don't care for you PVPers whining because people don't play the game the way you want them to. You're no better than the miners complaining because they got shot. Both sides feel entitled to something when they're not. So whats left? Play the f***ing game and STFU.
- In regard to other posts, I can't fathom how a current figure of people online (or some number crunch of how many are mining) could reveal whether or not people are unsubscribing. Has CCP actually confirmed this?
It's quite normal for player activity to drop during the summer as earlier mentioned
Diablo III is out as earlier mentioned
Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year
This thread fails. There is no war. CCP is after profit. |

Linna Excel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 23:53:00 -
[375] - Quote
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:Karn Dulake wrote:So do we win when there is no one left in the game?
Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are VC is whoever brings the most 'content' I think.
It's a sandbox, you set your own victory conditions. Like today I find a BPO on the markets for half the going price. I call that a victory. I <3 Vexors. |

CoffinQueen
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 00:13:00 -
[376] - Quote
forcing own believes onto other people is called fascism, so you are a fascist, James, and there always were and will be enough people who will never give in to fascists. |

Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
Perkone Caldari State
72
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 01:17:00 -
[377] - Quote
Linna Excel wrote:
It's a sandbox, you set your own victory conditions. Like today I find a BPO on the markets for half the going price. I call that a victory.
Interestingly, THIS is the most true-hearted inspirational post about the spirit of EVE that I have read in weeks.
+20 Ohh poor silly goon chillrens. Nobody in high sec cares about your plans to occupy jita like a bunch of dirty hippies. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 11:50:00 -
[378] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Uh, we have something called "passive targeters" and "ship scanners." No, really! Come on, you can't not believe me; just look in the market for yourself!
Yes, and I took those things into account. But one person's opinion cannot be the arbiter of all truths in terms of fittings.
Destiny Corrupted wrote: Well, enjoy losing your Drake to CONCORD for the satisfaction of killing a rookie ship that the guy will just get another copy of when he docks at the closest station.
Yet you ignore the fact that that's the exact mentality that's being promoted here. If I felt he was improperly fitted, or if he was mining, than shooting him should be incouraged.
Destiny Corrupted wrote: And when I play CoD, I'll shoot at the enemy's leg to get him down to low health, after which I'll stop shooting and offer him to surrender. In a nice game of ball, I'll aim my shots to only go near the basket/goal/hole, and then tell the opposing team that they need to play better.
We wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings in a competitive gaming environment, would we now? Scoring a goal in soccer (football to the European barbarians) might make the opposing team stop playing, and then no one will play soccer anymore. :(
This isn't CoD (THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!), and this also isn't Soccer, to use your OBVIOUSLY less barbaric name, this coming from the people who use "advanced interrogation". Politics and names of sports aside, there is no reason why if you aren't about to die anytime soon, you take them down to just above death and then threaten them for whatever money they have, and then give them some tips and fly off. That's another problem I have. If you can't meet a ransom, pirates should just settle for whatever you have. Some money is better than no money.
Destiny Corrupted wrote: There's a difference between not being able to afford expensive fittings, and not being able to rub two brain cells together to fit properly. Also, where the hell do you get off calling Hulk pilots new players? New players don't fly 250+ million ships.
A lot of the proper fits ARE expensive. Look: Send me what you think a proper Drake fit is, and I'll tell you the cost, for the entire forum to see. And also, I didn't say that new players fly Hulks. Remember: Hulkageddon isn't just about Exhumers and Orcas, in fact it has grown to include a "junior league" (according to the Hulkageddon site) for non-exhumers and mining barges and Orcas that are killed whilst mining. And a new player can easily get the 2-3 mil for the first level of mining barge within the 14 day trial period. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 13:13:00 -
[379] - Quote
John Caligan wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:Uh, we have something called "passive targeters" and "ship scanners." No, really! Come on, you can't not believe me; just look in the market for yourself! Yes, and I took those things into account. But one person's opinion cannot be the arbiter of all truths in terms of fittings. Destiny Corrupted wrote: Well, enjoy losing your Drake to CONCORD for the satisfaction of killing a rookie ship that the guy will just get another copy of when he docks at the closest station.
Yet you ignore the fact that that's the exact mentality that's being promoted here. If I felt he was improperly fitted, or if he was mining, than shooting him should be incouraged. Destiny Corrupted wrote: And when I play CoD, I'll shoot at the enemy's leg to get him down to low health, after which I'll stop shooting and offer him to surrender. In a nice game of ball, I'll aim my shots to only go near the basket/goal/hole, and then tell the opposing team that they need to play better.
We wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings in a competitive gaming environment, would we now? Scoring a goal in soccer (football to the European barbarians) might make the opposing team stop playing, and then no one will play soccer anymore. :(
This isn't CoD (THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!), and this also isn't Soccer, to use your OBVIOUSLY less barbaric name, this coming from the people who use "advanced interrogation". Politics and names of sports aside, there is no reason why if you aren't about to die anytime soon, you take them down to just above death and then threaten them for whatever money they have, and then give them some tips and fly off. That's another problem I have. If you can't meet a ransom, pirates should just settle for whatever you have. Some money is better than no money. Destiny Corrupted wrote: There's a difference between not being able to afford expensive fittings, and not being able to rub two brain cells together to fit properly. Also, where the hell do you get off calling Hulk pilots new players? New players don't fly 250+ million ships.
A lot of the proper fits ARE expensive. Look: Send me what you think a proper Drake fit is, and I'll tell you the cost, for the entire forum to see. And also, I didn't say that new players fly Hulks. Remember: Hulkageddon isn't just about Exhumers and Orcas, in fact it has grown to include a "junior league" (according to the Hulkageddon site) for non-exhumers and mining barges and Orcas that are killed whilst mining. And a new player can easily get the 2-3 mil for the first level of mining barge within the 14 day trial period.
So what we are doing in this post is comparing Hulkageddon, an event in a video game, with real torture? |

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 17:05:00 -
[380] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:
So what we are doing in this post is comparing Hulkageddon, an event in a video game, with real torture?
No: We're refuting all of your claims and saying that just because you call your messed-version of Rugby with the same name that we use for what you call "soccer", that doesn't mean that all Europeans are barbarians. |
|

EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:26:00 -
[381] - Quote
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz? The Goons quite loudly announced years ago they came in here to ruin the game. This is the fruit of their endeavor.
And theyve been trying to walk that statement back for years
Alia Gon'die wrote:
So what we are doing in this post is comparing Hulkageddon, an event in a video game, with real torture?
why not ppl usually compare it to real terrorism |

EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:28:00 -
[382] - Quote
grr ffs |

Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
26
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:31:00 -
[383] - Quote
I was sitting cloaked in your home system and a staggering 45.53% of your alliance docked up. lol numbers |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:34:00 -
[384] - Quote
Vicky Somers wrote:I was sitting cloaked in your home system and a staggering 45.53% of your alliance docked up. lol numbers
Wow, so you saw around 4500 players all dock up at once in VFK? That must have been quite the TiDI show. |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1781
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 18:58:00 -
[385] - Quote
Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year And what happens if Hulkageddon is never over?  |

Ohanka
Aggressive Narcissists
99
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 19:10:00 -
[386] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year And what happens if Hulkageddon is never over? 
The goons will forget to pay sov fees and be disbanded. The goonswarm will then flood to Highsec and destroy everything in its path like a plague of locusts. Like the eve apocolypse. |

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 06:20:00 -
[387] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year And what happens if Hulkageddon is never over?  I'll be amazed if you actually manage to stretch it out. Impressed even. |

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
480
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 06:27:00 -
[388] - Quote
Cheeks For Weeks wrote:James 315 wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year And what happens if Hulkageddon is never over?  I'll be amazed if you actually manage to stretch it out. Impressed even. Have you seen this announcement Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay!? |

Fouljin
Sanguine Marauders
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 06:46:00 -
[389] - Quote
I used to play eve with 4 accounts, never used a plex to pay for gametime. One toon is pure combat toon, missions and pvp, one is combat / miner and two are pure miners/builders basicly without any combat skills.
None of my mining ships have never been ganked. (few tries byt my hulks and orcas are tanked to the boot even in highsec) I have been away for few months because my reallife can sometimes be really hectic and busy but I have always returned. If general attitude towards miners is KOS then I have to rethink about activating all my accounts. I can bore my self to death with one account doing missions and pvp.
But as always, In Eve the darkside of human nature really pops up ;) (or whenever you get to do anything anonymously in internet)
|

Lexmana
Imperial Stout
482
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 06:50:00 -
[390] - Quote
Fouljin wrote: If general attitude towards miners is KOS then I have to rethink about activating all my accounts. I can bore my self to death with one account doing missions and pvp.
You can always roll another account for ganking. It is probably more fun than mining anyway. I hear this is now a valid profession with 100M ISK payout for every 10th gank (in addition to all the loot and salvage from the gank).
|
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
947
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 06:57:00 -
[391] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:Fouljin wrote: If general attitude towards miners is KOS then I have to rethink about activating all my accounts. I can bore my self to death with one account doing missions and pvp.
You can always roll another account for ganking. It is probably more fun than mining anyway. I hear this is now a valid profession with 100M ISK payout for every 10th gank (in addition to all the loot and salvage from the gank). You, too, can be a professional Exhumer Ganker.
Your bounty: 100million for every 10 turn-ins of "Exhumer-Class Ship Killmail".
Collect and turn in. Make ISK. Enjoy~ The cost of this program isn't all that large compared to reimbursements when on an active war footing. You can check the audits of the alliance money to see how much the latter is. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Gulboy
Severasse Mining Severasse Militarized Mining Union
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 07:49:00 -
[392] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Lexmana wrote:Fouljin wrote: If general attitude towards miners is KOS then I have to rethink about activating all my accounts. I can bore my self to death with one account doing missions and pvp.
You can always roll another account for ganking. It is probably more fun than mining anyway. I hear this is now a valid profession with 100M ISK payout for every 10th gank (in addition to all the loot and salvage from the gank). You, too, can be a professional Exhumer Ganker. Your bounty: 100million for every 10 turn-ins of "Exhumer-Class Ship Killmail". Collect and turn in. Make ISK. Enjoy~ The cost of this program isn't all that large compared to reimbursements when on an active war footing. You can check the audits of the alliance money to see how much the latter is. Heh heh, Goonswarm hulkageddon recruitment; effective I would say. I think you should make small payments to those hulks that tank themselves effectively. For example, someone in my old alliance was in a tanked/shield rigged hulk, and he succesfully tanked 5 thrashers. Someone should give a reward to this aswell. Me? I find suitable c1-3 wormholes and mine arkonor in their gravimetric sites. |

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 17:35:00 -
[393] - Quote
Lexmana wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:James 315 wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year And what happens if Hulkageddon is never over?  I'll be amazed if you actually manage to stretch it out. Impressed even. Have you seen this announcement Goonswarm Federation: Sponsoring Emergent Gameplay!?
It's an excellent business plan, but stuff like this can't last forever. Honestly if something like this manages to stretch out it would be the fault of the victims for not doing something about it. Indoctrinating people to become gankers isn't the answer as it simply isn't everyone's play style.
If I were at the top of that violent pyramid i'd be the one crafting the hulks to be destroyed. This has already been said, and I could care less if someone has a legitimate defense against it. It would be dumb not to take advantage of something like that,but lets be real here... extending HG for the sake of good graces is probably one of the most far-fetched excuses anyone could come up with in a game like EvE.
The part I can't figure out is how miners got it into their heads to allow themselves to become victims when they were fully warned that space wasn't safe. Risk aversion can be easy if you put some thought into it. Suicide ganking has been around long before hulkageddon V.
People will adapt. Eventually. Once they get around their self-absorbed notion that they are entitled to 100% protected mining. |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 17:40:00 -
[394] - Quote
why would we do something silly like craft hulks |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 17:40:00 -
[395] - Quote
that's a lot more effort than charging hundreds of millions for the mats |

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:19:00 -
[396] - Quote
I'm not saying I'm an expert at economics, but I'd imagine by now the market is flooded with mats as it is.
Selling hulks and macks using BPOs is something not everyone has access to. By having them destroyed, those who sell stand to gain because of the increased rate of purchase. It's also a good way to achieve a ballpark estimate on whether or not there are enough targets left to pop to keep HG going. I don't know the real sources of goon income, but I'm just speaking about HG.
I'd be willing to bet goons have the numbers as well as the extended alts to pull it off. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:23:00 -
[397] - Quote
Cheeks For Weeks wrote:I'm not saying I'm an expert at economics, but I'd imagine by now the market is flooded with mats as it is.
I'd be willing to bet goons have the numbers as well as the extended alts to pull it off.
More importantly, we have the finance people to understand the math.
Shocking I know. |

Drax Dremal
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 19:31:00 -
[398] - Quote
Results dont look good for EVE's player base.
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:00:00 -
[399] - Quote
Drax Dremal wrote:Results dont look good for EVE's player base.
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill
Aren't you the guy that accused us of bot moon mining?
|

Haldor Rune
State War Academy Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:01:00 -
[400] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Drax Dremal wrote:Results dont look good for EVE's player base.
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill Aren't you the guy that accused us of bot moon mining?
Looooool.
|
|

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:02:00 -
[401] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:I'm not saying I'm an expert at economics, but I'd imagine by now the market is flooded with mats as it is.
I'd be willing to bet goons have the numbers as well as the extended alts to pull it off. More importantly, we have the finance people to understand the math. Shocking I know.
Enlighten me. How hard is it to pull up a spreadsheet and calculate the HG revenue for the week? As I already stated, I don't know goon income, but I don't believe you'd be dumb enough to pull a publicity stunt without a budget. I can see them setting aside some isk to fuel their little game. As long as there are no diminishing returns on that budget, you could keep it going.
Quote:Results dont look good for EVE's player base.
Those who think that are the ones preparing to leave in the first place due to lack of willingness to accept the nature of the game. Honestly, it can't be that serious. |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:17:00 -
[402] - Quote
Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Aryth wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:I'm not saying I'm an expert at economics, but I'd imagine by now the market is flooded with mats as it is.
I'd be willing to bet goons have the numbers as well as the extended alts to pull it off. More importantly, we have the finance people to understand the math. Shocking I know. Enlighten me. How hard is it to pull up a spreadsheet and calculate the HG revenue for the week? As I already stated, I don't know goon income, but I don't believe you'd be dumb enough to pull a publicity stunt without a budget. I can see them setting aside some isk to fuel their little game. As long as there are no diminishing returns on that budget, you could keep it going. Quote:Results dont look good for EVE's player base. Those who think that are the ones preparing to leave in the first place due to lack of willingness to accept the nature of the game. Honestly, it can't be that serious.
You do not need a spreadsheet to "calculate the revenue". You only need to know how much of a hulk is tech, how much of the daily volume we sell, and is that greater than we we could possibly spend on HG.
Let me skip to the punchline, it is much greater. |

Khadann
First Legion
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:22:00 -
[403] - Quote
Just reading the title again...
Since when is there a war against miners? |

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 20:42:00 -
[404] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:Aryth wrote:Cheeks For Weeks wrote:I'm not saying I'm an expert at economics, but I'd imagine by now the market is flooded with mats as it is.
I'd be willing to bet goons have the numbers as well as the extended alts to pull it off. More importantly, we have the finance people to understand the math. Shocking I know. Enlighten me. How hard is it to pull up a spreadsheet and calculate the HG revenue for the week? As I already stated, I don't know goon income, but I don't believe you'd be dumb enough to pull a publicity stunt without a budget. I can see them setting aside some isk to fuel their little game. As long as there are no diminishing returns on that budget, you could keep it going. Quote:Results dont look good for EVE's player base. Those who think that are the ones preparing to leave in the first place due to lack of willingness to accept the nature of the game. Honestly, it can't be that serious. You do not need a spreadsheet to "calculate the revenue". You only need to know how much of a hulk is tech, how much of the daily volume we sell, and is that greater than we we could possibly spend on HG. Let me skip to the punchline, it is much greater.
So you're saying the revenue is much greater than goons could possibly spend on HG? Makes sense seeing as goons are considering letting it go indefinitely.
|

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:25:00 -
[405] - Quote
Cheeks For Weeks wrote:
So you're saying the revenue is much greater than goons could possibly spend on HG? Makes sense seeing as goons are considering letting it go indefinitely.
Mittens soft played it. It was always going to be indefinite. Until Tech is nerf (which we support), there is no reason to stop. |

Huan Chop
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:36:00 -
[406] - Quote
ok guys you win, The thought of permanent hulkageddon has driven me away. I'll go spend my money elsewhere. I get it! its not the game I thought it was. You tell me to go play something else. ok I will. Just remember. Be careful what you wish for. 12 million skill points invested. And for what... |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
324
|
Posted - 2012.05.31 01:54:00 -
[407] - Quote
James 315 wrote:According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here. If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong. Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead. I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak. What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there. The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line: The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there! Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP. As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears. In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone! - 315
intereting times :) thanks for the update. I've been having trouble getting thru my door, er... window... to play eve as much lately
... |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |