Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
So CCP have "balanced" incursions due to "risk vs isk" or thats the stand they will take on this, not going to go into details.
I have recently just been made aware of this "O-Tec" agreement between TEST, Raiden, CFC, PL, NCDot which basicaly means, who ever owns the tec moons currently will keep them. Now this simple agreement has completely removed the risk from owning such moons and therefore needs adressing.
The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL
Now this o-tec agreement is in place, i think that should be nuked from orbit |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
313
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT. Heh. |

AFK Hauler
State War Academy Caldari State
167
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
It's only so they can look at all the Tech in EVE in the Unified Inventory at the same time. Unified Tech fits with the Unified expansion.
Bigger laughs. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
268
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
So... it was BTL, TDF, et al that moved one of the highest paying activities in the game to highsec?
Dude, where can I get me some of that sort of power? Moving stuff around in the game? Crazy!
Or were you misusing the word risk? |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
313
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP let everyone in Goonswarm keep the old inventory system. Heh. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
blah blah blah, troll troll troll.
Seriously if incursinos were changed and people all got behind risk vs isk reasoning. This agreement and tech moons needs sorting |

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
324
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Honestly, what compels people to post **** like this? Nothing Found |

Vricrolatious
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:32:00 -
[8] - Quote
[quote=Devious Relation]stuff/quote]
I'm sorry, OTEC is a player made agreement, which is a feature and a product of the EVE Online sandbox, making OTEC a feature and not a bug that needs fixing. Now go buy some shiny new T2 item and remember, when you buy T2, you're buying products that are made possible by OTEC... have a nice day, citizen. WIDot, Best Dot, Even Sans Dot! -Vric |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vricrolatious wrote:[quote=Devious Relation]stuff/quote]
I'm sorry, OTEC is a player made agreement, which is a feature and a product of the EVE Online sandbox, making OTEC a feature and not a bug that needs fixing. Now go buy some shiny new T2 item and remember, when you buy T2, you're buying products that are made possible by OTEC... have a nice day, citizen.
And BTL/TDF wern't player made? Didnt stop the huge eve comminity getting behind the risk vs isk crap to get CCP to change them |
|

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
324
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's You should really curb the shitposting, it's unbecoming. Nothing Found |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
315
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
When even WIDOT can tell you how dumb you are you know you're in all kinds of trouble. Heh. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Devious Relation wrote:The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's You should really curb the shitposting, it's unbecoming.
Let me guess, you own a tech moon? |

Tinnin Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
315
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:37:00 -
[14] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:
Let me guess, you own a tech moon?
I'm mining a tech moon right now. Does that make you mad? Heh. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL
lol no |

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
324
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Let me guess, you own a tech moon? AHAHAHAHAHA
No.
But if I wanted to own one, I know where to find them and how to get one. Unfortunately, I'm not one for that much :effort:, my ambitions are rather small, and running a large alliance doesn't sound like that much fun. Nothing Found |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:40:00 -
[17] - Quote
SetrakDark wrote:Devious Relation wrote:The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL lol no
In the early days of incursions alot of ships were lost, and once they were sussed out not many people would run with unknown fleets..... why... because of the RISK |

Pres Crendraven
41
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:43:00 -
[18] - Quote
How long does Miss Universe get to keep the crown before we get to gawk at some other hottie.. Maybe we should all reset to ibis and tutorials, keep skill points and attitudes, lose assets. Meta34me
Corp and Alliance details hidden to protect the innocent. |

Ditra Vorthran
State War Academy Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
This is less of a Technium problem and more of a moon goo problem.
I have no problem with players coming together and creating something like OTECH. Eve is, after all, a sandbox and OTECH is a sand castle build out of Technium. Actually, I'm surprised someone hasn't done this sooner.
That being said, I object to the conditions that allow OTECH to exist:
1) Moon goo is only obtainable via one faucet. This allows a few people to own all the buckets.
2) The pervasiveness of Technium. This is CCPs fault as they built the game to require so much of it.
3) Moon goo income is a top-down income source. Unfortunately, this is really the only income source Alliances currently have. That won't change until CCP changes how Alliances make money.
Anyone could do this to any of the moon goo sources. It's not specifically restricted to Technium. It's just that Technium is the most valuable. So in order to do away with OTECH, or the possibility of OTECH-like entities to exist, a few things need to happen:
1) Change how Alliances make money. Bottom up automated member taxes, 'rent' in the form of automated fees (kind of like Station rental bills). 2) Once that is done, make moon goo obtainable from a variety of sources 3) change T2 blueprints so that the require a wider variety of resources to manufacture t2 goods. |

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:In the early days of incursions alot of ships were lost, and once they were sussed out not many people would run with unknown fleets..... why... because of the RISK
It's beyond a stretch to equate "learning" with a political arrangement. It is farce.
As with 90% of the threads on here: troll or stupid, can't tell for sure. Next. |
|

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
65
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:50:00 -
[21] - Quote
I agree the moons...and i mean ALL of them need to be looked at but sadly the ideas that CCP has i feel will not come into affect till winter expansion.......and that's if we a freakin lucky.
We all know that the Tech moons were the answers to the R64 moons. North vs South moons. what CCP did is that who ever it was got an ego trip and hilmar went along with as they both had their heads up each other's ass.
what should have been done is simple. I know they got a program that auto seeds the moon and sets in the data base. makes life easy. Reset the moons where there is a balance of moon goo and and Tech moons in all of 0.0 space, easiest fix they can do now and **** off all the 0.0 alliances at the same time.
when the winter expansion rolls around and the new bling bling of shield statics when there is an impact on them will be an awsome time to implement Ring Mining.....yes be an awsome way to remove the risk of moon mining to a risky mining operation with the Exhumers.
Yes that means you 0.0 carebear cousins would need to find miners to gather this. I will have no problem mining the stuff but i am not paying you to be there or be blue. you are paying me! |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3927
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:50:00 -
[22] - Quote
Needs removal.
|

SetrakDark
DarkCorp Capital Group DarkCorp Imperium
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:53:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ditra Vorthran wrote:This is less of a Technium problem and more of a moon goo problem...
Yup, that pretty much sums it up. Goo in general is in need of a retooling. Too much single-point value isn't great for the game. It puts too much wealth in the hands of too few (in terms of ceos and directors etc). There definitely needs to be more of a shift in value to average muppets in space pulling it out of belts or whatever. You do want to maintain some single-point rewards for good organizational leadership, but right now it is unbalanced.
CCP know all this, and it is the direction they are aiming their fixes, ironically suggested by some of the current biggest tech holders who were also the first to point out that tech was broken.
However, all of that aside, the state of moon goo has nothing to do with incursions, which were a terribly broken risk/reward arrangement desperately in need of a fix. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
590
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
I like the goons.
But if you don't you should stop buying T2 modules and ships. Use best named and boycott the goons and OTEC.
But that would require effort. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:55:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:Devious Relation wrote:
Let me guess, you own a tech moon?
I'm mining a tech moon right now. Does that make you mad?
Mining some tech in my osprey. Laughing at dumb scrubs who are going to buy my tech for the equivalent of 500mil an hour.
|

Arch Stanton's Neighbour
Forceful Resource Acquisition Inc
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 21:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
All you stupid whiners have two ways to solve the tech "problem".
1 - Band together and take the moons
2 - Find another resource and monopolize it
So quit whining |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 22:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:Devious Relation wrote:
Let me guess, you own a tech moon?
I'm mining a tech moon right now. Does that make you mad?
Not at all proves my point with the risk vs isk. Hey go take a nap, go for a walk sure that moon will still be there when your back, raking in the cash |

Mandy Stafford
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 22:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:Yes that means you 0.0 carebear cousins would need to find miners to gather this. I will have no problem mining the stuff but i am not paying you to be there or be blue. you are paying me! Ahahahahaha, renters will never be relevant. |

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 22:54:00 -
[29] - Quote
Mandy Stafford wrote:Ziranda Hakuli wrote:Yes that means you 0.0 carebear cousins would need to find miners to gather this. I will have no problem mining the stuff but i am not paying you to be there or be blue. you are paying me! Ahahahahaha, renters will never be relevant.
Your out of order! and to help you understand
watch?v=W3abMUH_P1E] |

Sarah Schneider
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
182
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 23:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:So CCP have "balanced" incursions due to "risk vs isk" or thats the stand they will take on this, not going to go into details.
I have recently just been made aware of this "O-Tec" agreement between TEST, Raiden, CFC, PL, NCDot which basicaly means, who ever owns the tec moons currently will keep them. Now this simple agreement has completely removed the risk from owning such moons and therefore needs adressing.
The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL
Now this o-tec agreement is in place, i think that should be nuked from orbit
This agreement effects 90% of the tech moons, how are new commers, the smaller corps/alliances ment to even get started? Its things like this that put new people off and eventualy will be the death of the game Do your research correctly before you post. "Eve isnGÇÖt some welcoming online utopia: itGÇÖs cut-throat, cruel, atavistic despite the futuristic setting. Give people a sandbox, and theyGÇÖll throw the sand in a rivalGÇÖs eyes before kicking them in the shins and destroying their sandcastle." -Keza MacDonald, IGN. |
|

Tobiaz
Spacerats
517
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 23:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ditra Vorthran wrote:This is less of a Technium problem and more of a moon goo problem.
- This is less of a moon-goo problem and more of a power-projection problem, which in turn is caused by the extreme low cost of jump and bridge mechanics. Without this, OTEC simply can't protect all it's moons effectively.
Yes, I know this is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, but anyone who's played EVE since the beginning has seen how null changed and what caused this. And it annoys me to no end if I see players encouraging CCP to go and mess with symptoms, ignoring the real causes.
I have no problem with players coming together and creating something like OTECH. Eve is, after all, a sandbox and OTECH is a sand castle build out of Technium. Actually, I'm surprised someone hasn't done this sooner.
- Actually this has been done before, or at least attempted. But never very as successful as now, likely the result of CFC dominance (again, without easy and low cost power-projection, a NAP-train this size would fall to boredom-rot and bickering in a matter of months.
That being said, I object to the conditions that allow OTECH to exist: 1) Moon goo is only obtainable via one faucet. This allows a few people to own all the buckets.
- Don't forget: the grass at the neighbor should always be greener in null. And perhaps it takes only a few people to own those buckets, but it takes a lot more to defend them as well. These faucets are paying for ship-replacement programs, backbone logistics and system development. I sincerely doubt many Tech moons are used solely as a personal ATM
2) The pervasiveness of Technium. This is CCPs fault as they built the game to require so much of it.
- I'm no MF-geek, but as I understand correctly from Akita's threadnought on this matter, the Tech bottleneck is indeed unbalanced. A good look at this matter, perhaps some additional reactions, also making other moongoo a bit more valuable in the process, would be welcome. That said, I think expensive T2 is a good thing. In EVE MMO-powercreep comes in the form of prices dropping and T1 and meta should remain viable by its affordability over T2.
3) Moon goo income is a top-down income source. Unfortunately, this is really the only income source Alliances currently have. That won't change until CCP changes how Alliances make money. - Only source of income? Aren't you forgetting renters and station taxes? I bet a lot of alliances collect contributions from their member corporations as well.
Anyone could do this to any of the moon goo sources. It's not specifically restricted to Technium. It's just that Technium is the most valuable. So in order to do away with OTECH, or the possibility of OTECH-like entities to exist, a few things need to happen:
- The only thing wrong with OTEC is their capability to project the power of their massive NAP-train. How long do you think that will last if it becomes too expensive for CFC to find their weekly fun beyond all their blue neighbors? How long will CFC be able to keep NC. in check if their southern allies start to balk at the price-tag of running all the way north every time a remote Tech-moon is threatened?
Boredom-rot & bickering kill more coalitions then wars do.
1) Change how Alliances make money. Bottom up automated member taxes, 'rent' in the form of automated fees (kind of like Station rental bills). 2) Once that is done, make moon goo obtainable from a variety of sources 3) change T2 blueprints so that the require a wider variety of resources to manufacture t2 goods.
- [i]An automated alliance tax on top of the automated corp tax isn't such a bad idea. And it wouldn't be bad for moongoo to have a secondary labor-capped source (like future ring-mining) or even tertiary source (like reactions or 5% yield W-moons) to set a limit to the power of cartels (though null-moons should remain the primary source of moongoo, because alliances NEED a good source of passive income as a foundation and something to squabble over).
Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
612
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 23:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
passive moon goo mining has been a broken idea for a long time. |

Jonah Gravenstein
403
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 23:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
OTEC is merely following the real world examples of production cartels like OPEC & the Medell+¡n Cartel, it's price fixing by means of distribution control and is common national and business practice, it is the way that most big businesses/ countries with rich natural resources stay on top of the pile.
The solution also follows real world examples, you can pay exorbitant prices for a controlled flow of resources, or you can engage in diplomacy, wangle deals to get access to cartel goods, if all else fails invade to get what you want. Recent history shows that military might is all to often involved in the scramble for resources in the real world, why should Eve be any different? It just so happens that OTEC probably have more military might than anybody else. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 08:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:OTEC is merely following the real world examples of production cartels like OPEC & the Medell+¡n Cartel, it's price fixing by means of distribution control and is common national and business practice, it is the way that most big businesses/ countries with rich natural resources stay on top of the pile.
The solution also follows real world examples, you can pay exorbitant prices for a controlled flow of resources, or you can engage in diplomacy, wangle deals to get access to cartel goods, if all else fails invade to get what you want. Recent history shows that military might is all to often involved in the scramble for resources in the real world, why should Eve be any different? It just so happens that OTEC probably have more military might than anybody else.
It is just supprising to me that under the reasoning "risk vs isk" alot of the eve community as well as ccp nuked incursions out of orbit, and now they are rarely ran. Whilst there are things so unbalanced and relativly risk free as moon goo, and this agreement just goes to prove it.
Incursions offere'd soemthing eve greatly needed, an easily accessable group activity open to everyone, be it part time gamer or hard core fanatic. They were relativly unlimited, one dies another spawns.
Moon Gpoo and especialy tech moons are only accessable to people who are either in or run a massive alliance. Meaning they are accesable to very few players, and yet weigh so heavily on the whole ecconomy of eve. If the average joe wanted to get said moon, they would either have to sign their life away to an alliance, griiiiiiiind thier way for a while, be it months or years, to hopefuly be thrown a scrap of moon that the alliance leader didnt deem his own.
CCP have stated mineing needs rebalancing, CCP and even the whole pewpew community want more targets to shoot. Ive seen a few people suggesting moonrings with said minerals/materials in them which require miners, be it hulks or other ships to mine. At first i didnt think this was a good idea, but after considering it all changed my mind, the reasons follow:
It would revamp mineing, giving miners a goal to work towards.
It would add "Risk tm" to a relativly risk free ISK faucet - forcing ships to be activly mineing vulnerably in space, which hopefuly would increase pvp, and even mineing defence fleets - these alliances/ fatcat alliance leaders would have to work for thier precious moon goo.
It would open up the activity to far more players - granted not as many as incursions but more then there are currently.
It would maybe shake up the whole state of 0.0, making more feesable roaming targets, more predictable places to go and fight that isnt ze enemys stagigng system which is full of moms/titans waiting to trolol face roll you.
All in all the moon belt mineing to me, sounds like a feesable solution to a very very old problem. But then again how long did it take for the Fergel bug to be fixed eh  |

Ohanka
The Lone Patrol Tactical Narcotics Team
55
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 08:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT.
jump off a cliff |

Roime
Shiva Furnace Dead On Arrival Alliance
808
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 08:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
I guess you are not aware that CCP is working on rebalancing moon goo by introducing ring mining. CCP Greyscale's visions also include better environment for smaller entities to thrive in null.
As a side note, the Mittani has also advocated for tech rebalancing for quite some time.
Gallente - the choice of the interstellar gentleman |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
682
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 08:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
I personally own 2 tech moons, all protected under the OTEC agreement, so even if im not online thousands of people will come and defend my personal ISK fountain. I bet that makes you cry into your pillow at night.
Incursions should be totally removed from hisec, you should feel glad we let you keep them at all. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Kazacy
BACKFIRE Squad S O L A R I S
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 09:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
To the OP a simple fix:
1) buy a stealth bomber. 2) go AFK cloackie (and ofc from time to time pop some miner/hauler/rating idiot) in a goon/raiden/whatever system until you reclaim back all techentium. 3) PROFIT
FFS it's a sandbox, don't whine and cry you can really do something but seems this is too hard for you eh? |

Easthir Ravin
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
16
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:20:00 -
[39] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:blah blah blah, troll troll troll.
Seriously if incursinos were changed and people all got behind risk vs isk reasoning. This agreement and tech moons needs sorting
Greetings
The difference you (explicative deleted) is that an agreement between power blocks is what EVE is all about. It is alliances (read groups of players) getting together in mutual agreement on aspects of player driven/ controlled elements of the game. Incursions balancing was due to the fact that they were too easy. I swear its like hitting my head against a brick wall trying to educate the masses about the differences between player driven content and game mechanics, but unlike the unsubbing tools I will not quit trying to make EVE a better place through community outreach posts in the forums.
vr East IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES: -á" I drank WHAT?!" |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
207
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:22:00 -
[40] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT.
Agreed you guys did good, but you should be able to be challenged in game, otherwise boring it will become.
Tal
|
|

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:32:00 -
[41] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:And BTL/TDF wern't player made? Didnt stop the huge eve comminity getting behind the risk vs isk crap to get CCP to change them incursions had no risk to them, and the changes were to curb blitzing the sites.
As someone else said, abloo bloo bloo my cheating got nerfed, I'm going to make 15073498729384 whiny threads about it. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:I personally own 2 tech moons, all protected under the OTEC agreement, so even if im not online thousands of people will come and defend my personal ISK fountain. I bet that makes you cry into your pillow at night.
Incursions should be totally removed from hisec, you should feel glad we let you keep them at all.
Few things, firstly i am shocked, amazed and led to believe you are lieing about the tech moon thing, as your alliance is FA. Well renters as far as i knew were never given high end goodies.
Secondly "you should feel glad we let you keep them at all" now if your not a CCP employee your indocating your some kinda of forum moaner who moaned so hard they were nerfed, and therefor no better then myself 
Third and finally, cmon a pillow? I sleep upside down swinging from the rafters |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT. Agreed you guys did good, but you should be able to be challenged in game, otherwise boring it will become. Tal Nobody's stopping you from doing so. The NC was bigger, and the NC was taken down in a matter of a few months. Stop being whiny bitches and organize. |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:38:00 -
[44] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Well renters as far as i knew were never given high end goodies. We don't do renters, we do allies. Hope that helps. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:41:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cmon, lets be serious, we all know its broken. Fix the UI then fix the game, instead of working on ship skins etc |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT. Agreed you guys did good, but you should be able to be challenged in game, otherwise boring it will become. Tal dont worry about us, we always find something to keep us entertained
|

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:45:00 -
[47] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Cmon, lets be serious, we all know its broken. Fix the UI then fix the game, instead of working on ship skins etc
Whats broken about the UI? |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Cmon, lets be serious, we all know its broken. Fix the UI then fix the game, instead of working on ship skins etc Whats broken about the UI? IT WAS CHANGED AND I'M NOT USED TO IT THEREFORE IT IS BROKEN AND I MUST UNSUB ABOUT IT :AAAA: |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
683
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:54:00 -
[49] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Rico Minali wrote:I personally own 2 tech moons, all protected under the OTEC agreement, so even if im not online thousands of people will come and defend my personal ISK fountain. I bet that makes you cry into your pillow at night.
Incursions should be totally removed from hisec, you should feel glad we let you keep them at all. Few things, firstly i am shocked, amazed and led to believe you are lieing about the tech moon thing, as your alliance is FA. Well renters as far as i knew were never given high end goodies. Secondly "you should feel glad we let you keep them at all" now if your not a CCP employee your indocating your some kinda of forum moaner who moaned so hard they were nerfed, and therefor no better then myself  Third and finally, cmon a pillow? I sleep upside down swinging from the rafters
My post was irony, it has iron in it, therefore is very very rusty. Like Maelstroms.
Oh and yeah the CFC doesnt do renters, guests, pets or meatshields. If you are strong enough to stay, you get to stay and if your strong enough to stay, all the rewards are there for you to enjoy. Now, im off to suckle at my personal technetium nipple... Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Sugar Kyle
The humbleless Crew Capital Punishment.
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:55:00 -
[50] - Quote
While there are balance issues with moongoo, having ccp nerf goons so that they are easierto challenge is not the key. They are such a powerful force because they work for it. Their leaders keep giving them interesting projects and challenges to keep them from descending into bickering and rot. I fully expect that the leadership players game of Eve is internal and external politics online to keep everything going.
But the challenge is the problem. One side of the board rages that high sec has the most players and should have the biggest stick. Yet, those are players who will not even stay in their corp and defend it. That boggles my mind. Ever tried saying hello in high sec local? It's complete silence in most systems. People who will not leave NPC corps because they might get a Dec. There are more then enough players in high sec to do something. However, as long as it is a series of small self interested groups they will not acquire the bilities to challenge the null sob groups.
It is not risk free for them to hold their moons. I'm sure they put a lot of time and energy into keeping the situation stable. That alone is a very impressive feat and one that makes Eve amazing.
Ccp can't punish them for being social in a social game. Moon rebalance or not, taking down any of these large alliances is for players to do, not Ccp.
Also the Goo itself is not income. The income comes from people buying it. Suggest they nerf the goon income by boycotts. I bet it goes over poorly.
(Posted from my phone. I blame autocorrect for any problems) |
|

TheBreadMuncher
Boxxed Up Industries EPIC Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
Tech moons have plenty of risk. It's the players' resilience that led to them having a secure control of these moons. Don't like it? Supercap blob them, then. I only ever emerge from the shadows when my main is banned. |

Prince Kobol
591
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:10:00 -
[52] - Quote
Personally I think the whole O-Tech agreement is a fantastic idea, I am only surprised that it has taken this long for somebody to get it organised.
What makes me laugh about people having ago at the goons is that they have been the loudest voice for getting CCP to change Tech Moons.
Also I believe it was CCP Soundwave who described Tech Moons as "ATM Isk Machines"
Plus this Cartel further helps to show CCP how unbalanced Tech Moons are.
On another note I suspect that that Cartel has a lot to do with making the absolute maximum amount of isk possible in the next 12-18 months before CCP implement a change.
If I had a say in the Cartel I would be stockpiling at least half of all the Tech and at the same time doubling if not tripling the price |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:16:00 -
[53] - Quote
How is ANY up comming alliance even ment to get close to challenging the tech holding large established alliances??
Money is power, the playerbase, or what represents the playerbase on these forums is hellbent on keeping the poor new guys poor, whilst as someone put "suckleing on thier tech nipple" themselfs, raking in the ISK becoming more and more untouchable.
For the majority of players the game needs progression, and once youve done some missioning, some mineing, some pvp or what ever else, there will come a day when you realise you have 2 choices, join an already established alliance and become a mindless CTA drone, put up and shut up with what ever unsociable hours your expected to play. Or quit simply find another game.
Myself im sure most of you realise, im a alt, of someone who has been around since 2003. with a short break in 2007-2008. I am really a null sec pvper. Troll joke laugh pick holes what ever. I am speaking the truth, one day everyone will come to realise the ahrsh reality of eve. Join the big boys as a drone or leave.
CCP wouldnt of had to nerf titans/balance MoMs if they wernt so damn common. Its actualy laughable now how many there are. Once upon a time that was a big deal "wow that alliance has a titan.... or 2"
1v1 pvp is dead, its all about bloooobbage, and if not bloobbaage ganking, both get stale after time so whats left.......... |

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:How is ANY up comming alliance even ment to get close to challenging the tech holding large established alliances?? The same was said of the NC. Where are they now? Oh right, they're gone because some people weren't whiny bitches and actually did something about them.
|

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:21:00 -
[55] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Devious Relation wrote:How is ANY up comming alliance even ment to get close to challenging the tech holding large established alliances?? The same was said of the NC. Where are they now? Oh right, they're gone because some people weren't whiny bitches and actually did something about them.
Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:25:00 -
[56] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Devious Relation wrote:How is ANY up comming alliance even ment to get close to challenging the tech holding large established alliances?? The same was said of the NC. Where are they now? Oh right, they're gone because some people weren't whiny bitches and actually did something about them. Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all ask ho chi minh
|

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:26:00 -
[57] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all By realizing that "unlimited isk" isn't an "I win" button. The NC had "unlimited isk" for a long, long time, and they're gone. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all By realizing that "unlimited isk" isn't an "I win" button. The NC had "unlimited isk" for a long, long time, and they're gone.
Unlimited ISK is a Iwin button, and the longer the game stays as it is the worse the situation becomes. The only hope for anyone is that large alliances implode. It shouldnt be like this |

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:30:00 -
[59] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all By realizing that "unlimited isk" isn't an "I win" button. The NC had "unlimited isk" for a long, long time, and they're gone. Unlimited ISK is a Iwin button, and the longer the game stays as it is the worse the situation becomes. The only hope for anyone is that large alliances implode. It shouldnt be like this Funny how that "I win" button didn't work for the NC then, eh? |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
683
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Fight smart. Why do people believe it is the technetium that makes people powerful? It isnt money, it is force of will. The CFC and all the other tech holding organisations wernt born with a technetium moon in their pocket, they took them. Then took more.
What you need is dedicated pilots (and anyone who thinks the large alliance is full of mindless drones clearly has no idea what they are talking about), charismatic but hard leaders who are prepared to make tough decisions and talented FCs to lead their fleets. If you have all this you dont need technetium, but if you do have all this, you sure as hell can go and take some for yourself. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |
|

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:32:00 -
[61] - Quote
I am unsure of the exact way the NC fell so cannot get into details.
But I think its fairly safe to assume it was because of a alliance between other alliances with alot of ISK, moms and titans which took them down. Reitterating the fact, there comes a tiem when people realise, join a established alliance or move on |

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:
Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all
Did it for 4 years in venal when the NC, BoB ASCN ect were at the hight of their power. We were the Afghanistan of EVE, a place where the superpowers of their day sent their fleets to die. |

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:38:00 -
[63] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:I am unsure of the exact way the NC fell so cannot get into details.
But I think its fairly safe to assume it was because of a alliance between other alliances with alot of ISK, moms and titans which took them down. Reitterating the fact, there comes a tiem when people realise, join a established alliance or move on Hey, so, why are you so hell-bent on taking space in the north, anyways? |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:37:00 -
[64] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Devious Relation wrote:I am unsure of the exact way the NC fell so cannot get into details.
But I think its fairly safe to assume it was because of a alliance between other alliances with alot of ISK, moms and titans which took them down. Reitterating the fact, there comes a tiem when people realise, join a established alliance or move on Hey, so, why are you so hell-bent on taking space in the north, anyways?
Im not interested in taking any space what so ever, I'm actualy comming to the end of my "eve life" i think. Getting so bored of the same stuff over and over. I am meerly interested in firstly, making the "pubbies" masses aweare of this NTEC agreement, and secondly putting it on the table that Moon goo is far more game breaking than incursions ever were. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:37:00 -
[65] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Devious Relation wrote:
Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all
Did it for 4 years in venal when the NC, BoB ASCN ect were at the hight of their power. We were the Afghanistan of EVE, a place where the superpowers of their day sent their fleets to die.
DURKA DURKA? :D |

Lord Zim
704
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:43:00 -
[66] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Im not interested in taking any space what so ever, I'm actualy comming to the end of my "eve life" i think. Getting so bored of the same stuff over and over. I am meerly interested in firstly, making the "pubbies" masses aweare of this NTEC agreement, and secondly putting it on the table that Moon goo is far more game breaking than incursions ever were. Well, see, these "new fledging alliances" you speak so highly of would, if they wanted to go after tech, simply have to find space somewhere where they can actually take the space, like down south. They would have to build up relations with their neighbours and build up a warchest and a competent fleet of people. And once that's done, once they think they have enough, they can start moving up the ladder.
There's absolutely no game mechanic which is in the game right now, which is stopping anyone from toppling the CFC off of tech, it's just a matter of organization and coordination. |

Gorki Andropov
Kerensky Initiatives
693
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:44:00 -
[67] - Quote
M-O-O-N, that spells 'moon'. |

Frying Doom
179
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:46:00 -
[68] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:There's absolutely no game mechanic which is in the game right now, which is stopping anyone from toppling the CFC off of tech, it's just a matter of organization and coordination. Except Sov and the Jump mechanics. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
Local Channel in Null must Die. Jump Drives need Nerfing. Null is meant to be dangerous and hard. Not safe and boring. |

Lord Zim
704
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:48:00 -
[69] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Lord Zim wrote:There's absolutely no game mechanic which is in the game right now, which is stopping anyone from toppling the CFC off of tech, it's just a matter of organization and coordination. Except Sov and the Jump mechanics. Since when did the sov mechanics stop anyone from taking space if they really, really wanted it? And what does the "jump mechanics" have to do with anything here? |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:14:00 -
[70] - Quote
Lord you and anyone with a basic knowledge of the game mechanics know exactly why |
|

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
204
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:27:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:OTEC is merely following the real world examples of production cartels like OPEC & the Medell+¡n Cartel, it's price fixing by means of distribution control and is common national and business practice, it is the way that most big businesses/ countries with rich natural resources stay on top of the pile.
The solution also follows real world examples, you can pay exorbitant prices for a controlled flow of resources, or you can engage in diplomacy, wangle deals to get access to cartel goods, if all else fails invade to get what you want. Recent history shows that military might is all to often involved in the scramble for resources in the real world, why should Eve be any different? It just so happens that OTEC probably have more military might than anybody else.
Yeah, it's just like the real world.
In the real world, when an oil rig is under attack, a "reinforce timer" goes up after it goes into structure and the insurgents have to wait for the current owners to show up before they can resume fire.
Just ask the United States in Iraq. I'm pretty sure that is how it works.
Also, the entire army of a country can gather in one place, click their heals together, and be half way around the world in an instant. Or something.
And all the oil is just concentrated in the Middle East to... well, it really isn't. Only about 30% of total oil production is in the Middle East. So I guess that is wrong to. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
71
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:29:00 -
[72] - Quote
Is it time for the daily tech whine thread already? Bad Goons! You should be ashamed of yourselves! |

Lord Zim
704
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:29:00 -
[73] - Quote
So I hear timezone wars are a thing in the real world. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
204
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:35:00 -
[74] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:So I hear timezone wars are a thing in the real world.
Why thank you for agreeing with me about how stupid the mechanics by which the Goons hold Sov are! |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:43:00 -
[75] - Quote
Oh, I see, we hold sov purely because of ... timezones.
Nerf timezones. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:45:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Oh, I see, we hold sov purely because of ... timezones.
Nerf timezones.
No just fix bad mechanics and address REAL issues with the game. Or has it gone on for too long and CCP cannot actualy rectofy the issues now. *whispers Fergel bug* |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:46:00 -
[77] - Quote
I can get down with removing any and all reinforcement timers. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:01:00 -
[78] - Quote
On a logical note, CCP did recently totaly well and truely "balance" datacores and moneymaking not being logged in, hopefuly moons are next as they are the same deal pretty much |

Eso Es
Li3's Electric Cucumber SpaceMonkey's Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's
Pretty sure the old Incursion system was a great example of this, careful throwing that word "hypocrite" around, might just rebound and land on you m8.
|

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:08:00 -
[80] - Quote
Eso Es wrote:Devious Relation wrote:The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's Pretty sure the old Incursion system was a great example of this, careful throwing that word "hypocrite" around, might just rebound and land on you m8.
In what way, incursions were open to EVERY player, the only limitations were player created communitys which rules pretty much were, grief a fleet and your out of the community. So yeah hardly eliete rich peoples trying to keep the new guy poor. BTL/CID and TDF were the most welcoming un judgemental communitys that ive seen ina while on eve. Certainly alot less ahrsh then ANY 0.0 corporation/community |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
433
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:44:00 -
[81] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Yeah, it's just like the real world.
In the real world, when an oil rig is under attack, a "reinforce timer" goes up after it goes into structure and the insurgents have to wait for the current owners to show up before they can resume fire.
Just ask the United States in Iraq. I'm pretty sure that is how it works.
Also, the entire army of a country can gather in one place, click their heals together, and be half way around the world in an instant. Or something.
And all the oil is just concentrated in the Middle East to... well, it really isn't. Only about 30% of total oil production is in the Middle East. So I guess that is wrong to.
In the real world an oil rig is not protected by a sizeable forcefield and multiple weapons platforms, therefore your point is moot.
As for your "clicking heels together" comment, most modern military forces can be on the scene of a conflict within 24 hours, compared to 50 years ago that is indeed pretty much instantaneous deployment. Seeing as Eve is set 20 odd thousand years in the future it is not inconceivable that the ability to project force in a lesser time period would be possible, regardless of distance.
Nowhere did I mention the middle east and specifically Iraq. Membership of OPEC is not restricted to countries in the middle east, here's a list of members for you.
Member Countries of OPEC Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela
If anything the Arabic countries are not all powerful in OPEC, there's a fair few African countries in the list and some Central American ones to. The 30% of oil production that the middle east holds is a damn big chunk of current production, the fact that it's relatively easy to get to compared to say the Shale fields in North America makes it in effect an even bigger chunk simply because of ease of access.
I was merely comparing OTEC to real world Cartels, I was not stating that the reality of real world conflict = the reality of eve conflict. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:49:00 -
[82] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Yeah, it's just like the real world.
In the real world, when an oil rig is under attack, a "reinforce timer" goes up after it goes into structure and the insurgents have to wait for the current owners to show up before they can resume fire.
Just ask the United States in Iraq. I'm pretty sure that is how it works.
Also, the entire army of a country can gather in one place, click their heals together, and be half way around the world in an instant. Or something.
And all the oil is just concentrated in the Middle East to... well, it really isn't. Only about 30% of total oil production is in the Middle East. So I guess that is wrong to.
In the real world an oil rig is not protected by a sizeable forcefield and multiple weapons platforms, therefore your point is moot. As for your "clicking heels together" comment, most modern military forces can be on the scene of a conflict within 24 hours, compared to 50 years ago that is indeed pretty much instantaneous deployment. Seeing as Eve is set 20 odd thousand years in the future it is not inconceivable that the ability to project force in a lesser time period would be possible, regardless of distance. Nowhere did I mention the middle east and specifically Iraq. Membership of OPEC is not restricted to countries in the middle east, here's a list of members for you. Member Countries of OPEC Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela If anything the Arabic countries are not all powerful in OPEC, there's a fair few African countries in the list and some Central American ones to. The 30% of oil production that the middle east holds is a damn big chunk of current production, the fact that it's relatively easy to get to compared to say the Shale fields in North America makes it in effect an even bigger chunk simply because of ease of access. I was merely comparing OTEC to real world Cartels, I was not stating that the reality of real world conflict = the reality of eve conflict.
This OTEC agreement actualy governs 90% of the TECH moons..... 90% |

Jonah Gravenstein
433
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 14:55:00 -
[83] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:
This OTEC agreement actualy governs 90% of the TECH moons..... 90%
Then it's a pretty good comparison, the OPEC agreement actually governs 79% of the worlds oil production as of 2010, for a real world example of the sort of power that a cartel of this magnitude wields you only have to look at the oil crisis of the early 1970s.
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
48
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:14:00 -
[84] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Eso Es wrote:Devious Relation wrote:The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's Pretty sure the old Incursion system was a great example of this, careful throwing that word "hypocrite" around, might just rebound and land on you m8. In what way, incursions were open to EVERY player, the only limitations were player created communitys which rules pretty much were, grief a fleet and your out of the community. So yeah hardly eliete rich peoples trying to keep the new guy poor. BTL/CID and TDF were the most welcoming un judgemental communitys that ive seen ina while on eve. Certainly alot less ahrsh then ANY 0.0 corporation/community right, if you aren't in shinies, gtfo, that's pretty "open" to new players |

Antisocial Malkavian
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
115
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:19:00 -
[85] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Devious Relation wrote:
This OTEC agreement actualy governs 90% of the TECH moons..... 90%
Then it's a pretty good comparison, the OPEC agreement actually governs 79% of the worlds oil production as of 2010, for a real world example of the sort of power that a cartel of this magnitude wields you only need to look at the oil crisis of the early 1970s. Cartels holding the rest of humanity to ransom is nothing new.
A better example would be Pakistan holding 90% of the world's oil. Or one of the other countries that seems to hate everyone else, the US for example http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Jonah Gravenstein
434
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:19:00 -
[86] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:right, if you aren't in shinies, gtfo, that's pretty "open" to new players
pretty much this, some of the incursion FCs were elitist asshats, if you weren't flying bling you weren't joining their fleet.
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
206
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:44:00 -
[87] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Yeah, it's just like the real world.
In the real world, when an oil rig is under attack, a "reinforce timer" goes up after it goes into structure and the insurgents have to wait for the current owners to show up before they can resume fire.
Just ask the United States in Iraq. I'm pretty sure that is how it works.
Also, the entire army of a country can gather in one place, click their heals together, and be half way around the world in an instant. Or something.
And all the oil is just concentrated in the Middle East to... well, it really isn't. Only about 30% of total oil production is in the Middle East. So I guess that is wrong to.
In the real world an oil rig is not protected by a sizeable forcefield and multiple weapons platforms, therefore your point is moot. As for your "clicking heels together" comment, most modern military forces can be on the scene of a conflict within 24 hours, compared to 50 years ago that is indeed pretty much instantaneous deployment. Seeing as Eve is set 20 odd thousand years in the future it is not inconceivable that the ability to project force in a lesser time period would be possible, regardless of distance. Nowhere did I mention the middle east and specifically Iraq. Membership of OPEC is not restricted to countries in the middle east, here's a list of members for you. Member Countries of OPEC Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela If anything the Arabic countries are not all powerful in OPEC, there's a fair few African countries in the list and some Central American ones to. The 30% of oil production that the middle east holds is a damn big chunk of current production, the fact that it's relatively easy to get to compared to say the Shale fields in North America makes it in effect an even bigger chunk simply because of ease of access. I was merely comparing OTEC to real world Cartels, I was not stating that the reality of real world conflict = the reality of eve conflict.
My god, you are actually going to defend your ******** drooling.
1.So you are saying if force fields are developed in RL they will have "reinforcement timers" on them? Seriously?
2.Last time I checked the US has bases all around the world so that it can get a very small fraction of it's firepower anywhere in the world in 24 hours. That is because that small fraction of it's firepower was already bases 90% of the way there.
These strategic bases are a division of forces that is necessary for the US to have that response time. This is not in anyway present in Eve thanks to Jump Drive tardism. Thank you for further proving my point.
3.All the moons ARE almost entirely in one place which is what makes OPEC not at all like stupid tech monopoly. Also, OPEC is not "almost all oil production" either. Again, you are just making stuff up. |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:48:00 -
[88] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:1.So you are saying if force fields are developed in RL they will have "reinforcement timers" on them? Seriously? Real life != a game.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:2.Last time I checked the US has bases all around the world so that it can get a very small fraction of it's firepower anywhere in the world in 24 hours. That is because that small fraction of it's firepower was already bases 90% of the way there.
These strategic bases are a division of forces that is necessary for the US to have that response time. This is not in anyway present in Eve thanks to Jump Drive tardism. Thank you for further proving my point. What you actually mean to say is that these strategic bases aren't replicated in EVE because of the SOV system, not because of the jump drives. Unless you mean to say that when we derp around with 1000 subcaps, they're all magically moved around by jumpdrives instead of, oh I dunno, using gates.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:3.All the moons ARE almost entirely in one place which is what makes OPEC not at all like stupid tech monopoly. Also, OPEC is not "almost all oil production" either. Again, you are just making stuff up. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
206
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:55:00 -
[89] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:1.So you are saying if force fields are developed in RL they will have "reinforcement timers" on them? Seriously? Real life != a game. Jessie-A Tassik wrote:2.Last time I checked the US has bases all around the world so that it can get a very small fraction of it's firepower anywhere in the world in 24 hours. That is because that small fraction of it's firepower was already bases 90% of the way there.
These strategic bases are a division of forces that is necessary for the US to have that response time. This is not in anyway present in Eve thanks to Jump Drive tardism. Thank you for further proving my point. What you actually mean to say is that these strategic bases aren't replicated in EVE because of the SOV system, not because of the jump drives. Unless you mean to say that when we derp around with 1000 subcaps, they're all magically moved around by jumpdrives instead of, oh I dunno, using gates. Jessie-A Tassik wrote:3.All the moons ARE almost entirely in one place which is what makes OPEC not at all like stupid tech monopoly. Also, OPEC is not "almost all oil production" either. Again, you are just making stuff up. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm
Goon are such liars. |

Jonah Gravenstein
434
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:55:00 -
[90] - Quote
I am well aware that the US has bases scattered all over the world, I was brought up in very close proximity to most of the ones in Europe, I've been attached to US forces on a couple as well.
If you could actually be arsed to do some research you would find that OPEC does indeed control 79% of oil reserves and very nearly 50% of gross oil production, I'll admit I got my production and reserves mixed up, I'll be correcting the relevant post in a minute.
Forcefields being a theoretical technology still renders your point moot by the way.
Ohh and I'm not drooling, the wetness on my face is actually tears because I'm laughing so hard at your attempts to contradict known facts about OPEC War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |
|

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:58:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Goon are such liars. I know the truth hurts, and being in denial makes the pain go away. But push through it, it'll get better soon! |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
207
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:58:00 -
[92] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Goon are such liars. I know the truth hurts, and being in denial makes the pain go away. But push through it, it'll get better soon!
Production is reserves now, zippy? Not that OPEC's published reserves are actually true, they are not. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
450
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:01:00 -
[93] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Production is reserves now, zippy? Not that OPEC's published reserves are actually true, they are not.
yo we're not talking about RL oil cartels we're talking about eve tech cartels eh |

Jonah Gravenstein
434
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:02:00 -
[94] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Goon are such liars. I know the truth hurts, and being in denial makes the pain go away. But push through it, it'll get better soon! Production is reserves now, zippy? Not that OPEC's published reserves are actually true, they are not.
So GSF now runs OPEC? I for one welcome our buzzing yellow insect overlords.
Reserves=potential production BTW
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:02:00 -
[95] - Quote
Hey so if we're controlling 90% of the tech moons, and providing 90% of the tech on the market, doesn't that actually make us less moneygrabby than OPEC? |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
397
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:15:00 -
[96] - Quote
The Mittani lobbied heavily during CSM6 for the Technetium situation to be rebalanced. Unfortunately, due to his non-participation in CSM7 he has not been able to keep up this pressure and get the issue fixed, with the end result that OTEC has emerged to exploit the system for all its worth.
Be careful what you wish for in future. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Darth Kilth
Clan Exiled Legends
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:15:00 -
[97] - Quote
TheBreadMuncher wrote:Tech moons have plenty of risk. It's the players' resilience that led to them having a secure control of these moons. Don't like it? Supercap blob them, then. Which is impossible to do unless you to are a tech moon holding aliance. Nobody else has the funds to challenge them, and anyone that has the funds to challenge them is part of the entire deal.
Face it, Tech moons as they currently exist create a vicious circle making powerful alliances even more powerful.
0.0 is pretty much the biggest carebear place around currently. The big alliances have no reason to fight each other and have literally zero risk within their own territory that they barely have to bother defending.
I guess the comparison to oil cartels is apt, except the oil barons will run out of oil eventually, Tech moons will never be depleted.
In the end tough I doubt this will change any time soon, remember that old incident with the moon exploit? Took ages to get fixed, and this is unlikely to get changed any time soon. The alliances will continuing to accumulate resources and money, in a while even titans will be considered expendable by them.
The only way the current system could keep working is if all the aliances where at each others throat and war was a daily occurance for any aliance up there. Reminds me of the current debt system which will only work if all money that gets payd off also enters the system again so someone else can use it to clean their debt, but due to some rich people stockpiling money that doesn't happen. But that is going a bit far from the topic.
Either way, moon mining is rather imbalanced in the way the 0.0 alliances are currently working. And the more time it takes to fix this how harder it will be to even challenge these alliances. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:19:00 -
[98] - Quote
Darth Kilth wrote:0.0 is pretty much the biggest carebear place around currently. The big alliances have no reason to fight each other and have literally zero risk within their own territory that they barely have to bother defending. Let's ask White Noise how they feel about risk. Or the NC. Or CVA. Or ev0ke. Or any alliance which is in, or has been in nullsec the last 5 years.
Darth Kilth wrote:Either way, moon mining is rather imbalanced in the way the 0.0 alliances are currently working. And the more time it takes to fix this how harder it will be to even challenge these alliances. Don't say we didn't warn you. |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
252
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:22:00 -
[99] - Quote
Players created the content 'tech wars' and players need to balance it. i.e. start taking some moons. . |

Darth Kilth
Clan Exiled Legends
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:29:00 -
[100] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Darth Kilth wrote:0.0 is pretty much the biggest carebear place around currently. The big alliances have no reason to fight each other and have literally zero risk within their own territory that they barely have to bother defending. Let's ask White Noise how they feel about risk. Or the NC. Or CVA. Or ev0ke. Or any alliance which is in, or has been in nullsec the last 5 years. CVA, you mean those small guys in providence? or NC who got their ass kicked in their own hubris? I specifically meant the big alliances that haven't pissed of everyone (except the goons because they can do that and get away scot free) and got enough fire-power to make themselves an unattractive target.
Lord Zim wrote:Darth Kilth wrote:Either way, moon mining is rather imbalanced in the way the 0.0 alliances are currently working. And the more time it takes to fix this how harder it will be to even challenge these alliances. Don't say we didn't warn you. I was warned, but I wasn't the one making decisions and still aint the one making them.
|
|

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:35:00 -
[101] - Quote
Darth Kilth wrote:or NC who got their ass kicked in their own hubris? I specifically meant the big alliances that haven't pissed of everyone (except the goons because they can do that and get away scot free) and got enough fire-power to make themselves an unattractive target. Yes, the NC. The coalition where a majority of EVE said "the NC is killing eve", because the NC was so huge and had "so much firepower to make themselves an unattractive target". That NC. |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:37:00 -
[102] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Darth Kilth wrote:or NC who got their ass kicked in their own hubris? I specifically meant the big alliances that haven't pissed of everyone (except the goons because they can do that and get away scot free) and got enough fire-power to make themselves an unattractive target. Yes, the NC. The coalition where a majority of EVE said "the NC is killing eve", because the NC was so huge and had "so much firepower to make themselves an unattractive target". That NC. Oh snap! "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
902
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:48:00 -
[103] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Darth Kilth wrote:or NC who got their ass kicked in their own hubris? I specifically meant the big alliances that haven't pissed of everyone (except the goons because they can do that and get away scot free) and got enough fire-power to make themselves an unattractive target. Yes, the NC. The coalition where a majority of EVE said "the NC is killing eve", because the NC was so huge and had "so much firepower to make themselves an unattractive target". That NC. Oh snap! Heh heh heh ... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:00:00 -
[104] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:The Mittani lobbied heavily during CSM6 for the Technetium situation to be rebalanced. Unfortunately, due to his non-participation in CSM7 he has not been able to keep up this pressure and get the issue fixed, with the end result that OTEC has emerged to exploit the system for all its worth.
Be careful what you wish for in future.
In that case it is a pitty what happened at fan fest did. CCP defiantly need constant pressure into balancing this and as soon as possible.
The guys quoting old alliance names and guys who have left 0.0. There were, in many cases, mittogating circumstances. High position deals, mergers as well as the not so honest things that have gone on. After all didnt a portion of WI join goons HERP DA DERRP |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
904
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:17:00 -
[105] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:The Mittani lobbied heavily during CSM6 for the Technetium situation to be rebalanced. Unfortunately, due to his non-participation in CSM7 he has not been able to keep up this pressure and get the issue fixed, with the end result that OTEC has emerged to exploit the system for all its worth.
Be careful what you wish for in future. In that case it is a pitty what happened at fan fest did. CCP defiantly need constant pressure into balancing this and as soon as possible. The guys quoting old alliance names and guys who have left 0.0. There were, in many cases, mittogating circumstances. High position deals, mergers as well as the not so honest things that have gone on. After all didnt a portion of WI join goons HERP DA DERRP Don't worry, making the most of the tech is helping. And all the whines on General Discussion are only adding to the pressure, so whine more ~~
Yeah. We have WIdot. people. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:29:00 -
[106] - Quote
Someone joked before, "should we all just be reset into rookie ships with no ISK" thats looking more and more like a good idea.  |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
904
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:42:00 -
[107] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Someone joked before, "should we all just be reset into rookie ships with no ISK" thats looking more and more like a good idea.  Reaperswarm
It's time to downgrade from Rifters  Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

alittlebirdy
All Hail The Liopleurodon
31
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:49:00 -
[108] - Quote
Sadly the OP is right... the ONE thing people INSIDE the game could do as a group and be good at got nerfed..
Goons < outside of eve group TEST < alot of outside of eve people O snap thats the MAIN power in nulll and it did not come from building inside the game but from outside...
Sorry tech moons have no current risk, for the 15bill/month it makes the risk is nill and CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions OR nerf the **** out of moons in general. |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
216
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:50:00 -
[109] - Quote
HVAC Repairman wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT. Agreed you guys did good, but you should be able to be challenged in game, otherwise boring it will become. Tal dont worry about us, we always find something to keep us entertained
Yes but pulling wings off flies will only take you so far. 
Tal
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
686
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:53:00 -
[110] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote:Sadly the OP is right... the ONE thing people INSIDE the game could do as a group and be good at got nerfed..
Goons < outside of eve group TEST < alot of outside of eve people O snap thats the MAIN power in nulll and it did not come from building inside the game but from outside...
Sorry tech moons have no current risk, for the 15bill/month it makes the risk is nill and CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions OR nerf the **** out of moons in general.
Spoken like someone who has never had to take a Tech moon, or defend one, or take one back. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |
|

Derth Ramir
Hellion Evolution
35
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:54:00 -
[111] - Quote
Welcome to eve you ******* ***** **** like this is what makes this game epic. Players controlling the game is why I play this. Go hang yourself OP. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:56:00 -
[112] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote:Sorry tech moons have no current risk Have you even seen a tech moon?
alittlebirdy wrote:CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions ahahahahahahahahahaha
No.
alittlebirdy wrote:OR nerf the **** out of moons in general. Remove T2 from the game, moons in general nerfed. |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
216
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:57:00 -
[113] - Quote
Derth Ramir wrote:Welcome to eve you ******* ***** **** like this is what makes this game epic. Players controlling the game is why I play this. Go hang yourself OP.
I wanna know whats under the stars.
I'm guessing f*king re*ard sh*t
Tal
|

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
454
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:09:00 -
[114] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote:CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions OR nerf the **** out of moons in general.
You can take a tech moon. How do you prevent a group from running incursions in hisec? eh |

Darth Kilth
Clan Exiled Legends
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:17:00 -
[115] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:alittlebirdy wrote:CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions OR nerf the **** out of moons in general. You can take a tech moon. How do you prevent a group from running incursions in hisec? You suicide gank them with cheap ships available to everyone. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:21:00 -
[116] - Quote
Nah man, what you do is shoot the mothership as sooon as possible. That really ticks them off. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
369
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:23:00 -
[117] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:So CCP have "balanced" incursions due to "risk vs isk" or thats the stand they will take on this, not going to go into details.
I have recently just been made aware of this "O-Tec" agreement between TEST, Raiden, CFC, PL, NCDot which basicaly means, who ever owns the tec moons currently will keep them. Now this simple agreement has completely removed the risk from owning such moons and therefore needs adressing.
The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL
Now this o-tec agreement is in place, i think that should be nuked from orbit
This agreement effects 90% of the tech moons, how are new commers, the smaller corps/alliances ment to even get started? Its things like this that put new people off and eventualy will be the death of the game
When Band of Brothers (one of the first most powerful alliances that ever existed at the time) was taken down by just a couple of players with a few mouse clicks, people with your attitude went to CCP to try to undo the damage because they believed that no one person should have that kind of power. But CCP said "NO" because all of that happened under the rules of the game. What makes you think CCP is going to take out OTEC? CCP endorsed it for god sake. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:29:00 -
[118] - Quote
Derth Ramir wrote:Welcome to eve you ******* ***** **** like this is what makes this game epic. Players controlling the game is why I play this. Go hang yourself OP.
I sense anger issues. want a cookie? |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:31:00 -
[119] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:alittlebirdy wrote:CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions OR nerf the **** out of moons in general. You can take a tech moon. How do you prevent a group from running incursions in hisec?
And how do you spose the average joe does that then?......... exactly its not possible for anyone without a huge alliance and massive funding - like a tech moon or 2 - to even consider doing so |

Rath Kelbore
The Six-Pack Syndicate
203
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:32:00 -
[120] - Quote
CCP made a game that is supposed to be all about freedom of choice, do whatever you want(within specified parameters), risk vs reward, actions and consequences, ect. So a few groups of players took over tech moons, then made an agreement to not fight over them and you're mad?
You want CCP to do something about it? Even though that would be the exact opposite of what eve is suppose to be about? If you don't like the fact that those groups own all the tech moons, make your own group, then go take the tech moons. "waaah that's not possible, they are too entrenched, blah blah blah."
I'm sorry they've been growing their alliance for years and have established some power and you're just starting out and can't go take them out in a day. If you really want to remove them start building now. In a year or two you might be in a position to do something about it.
"That's ridiculous and unfair"
No, it's not. They've been working at this for a very long time, you're mad about it.....what today? Yesterday? A week ago? What steps have you taken to remove them from their position? None? Unless you count whining on the forums a step.
If CCP were to do something about a bunch of players that achieved whatever goal they were going after "legally" then this game would be World of Warcraft, and I would quit. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |
|

Malak Dawnfire
27th Gallentean Fleet
90
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:36:00 -
[121] - Quote
NULL SEC IS THE NEW HIGH SEC!!! NOBODY FIGHTS DOWN THERE AT ALL, MOONS ARE ALL OWNED BY BIG ALLIANCES AND THEY AGREE TO NOT ENGAGE EACH OTHER IN COMBAT EXCEPT FOR VERBAL SPARS!
REMOVE MOONS FROM NULL, PLACE THEM IN HIGH! EVERYBODY WINS! |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:38:00 -
[122] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote: In a year or two you might be in a position to do something about it.
The game probubly wont last another 2 years.
You yourself mentioned "Risk vs Reward" moon mineing in its current state, especialy with the OTEC agreement has no risk. Therfore needs addressing. |

Typherian
Tri-gun Psychotic Tendencies.
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:38:00 -
[123] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Someone joked before, "should we all just be reset into rookie ships with no ISK" thats looking more and more like a good idea.  Reaperswarm It's time to downgrade from Rifters 
Ok I don't care bout tech moons and crap but that is a brilliant idea. A swarm of thousands of nubships fighting each other would be pure video game gold.
BTW I don't mean forcing everyone to reset to 0 isk and only nubships I mean a nubship thunderdome for shiggles. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:40:00 -
[124] - Quote
Malak Dawnfire wrote:NULL SEC IS THE NEW HIGH SEC!!! NOBODY FIGHTS DOWN THERE AT ALL, MOONS ARE ALL OWNED BY BIG ALLIANCES AND THEY AGREE TO NOT ENGAGE EACH OTHER IN COMBAT EXCEPT FOR VERBAL SPARS!
REMOVE MOONS FROM NULL, PLACE THEM IN HIGH! EVERYBODY WINS!
Not at all, if you placed moons in high noone would be in null. The whole moon ring mineing idea is a good one, would open up the wealth from moons to more then the moon owner, and give the smaller guy a fighting chance to if not claim tech, to atleast disrupt a larger alliance with it so they actualy would have to work for thier isk. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:43:00 -
[125] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:And how do you spose the average joe does that then?......... exactly its not possible for anyone without a huge alliance and massive funding - like a tech moon or 2 - to even consider doing so Did white noise etc have a fucktonne of tech moons before they took down an entity which was just as big if not bigger than the CFC? No? Well then. |

Rath Kelbore
The Six-Pack Syndicate
204
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:46:00 -
[126] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote: In a year or two you might be in a position to do something about it. The game probubly wont last another 2 years. You yourself mentioned "Risk vs Reward" moon mineing in its current state, especialy with the OTEC agreement has no risk. Therfore needs addressing.
First off, it's mining. You don't need the E there(among other spelling mistakes). Secondly, if you look through the forums starting in 2003 you will find a ******** amount of posts about how EVE won't last another two years. Finally, the OTEC agreement does not remove risk. That would be like saying if you form an alliance you are removing risk from the game.
Are you part of this OTEC agreement? No. Therefore(note the spelling)you are a potential risk to their moon mining. Of course in reality you are not because you won't do anything about it other than whine on the forums but hopefully you can understand the point?
Another thing, just because there's an otec agreement today doesn't mean it'll be there tomorrow. People never ever ever ever ever backstab other players/corps/alliances in eve. It NEVER happens. Seriously, not even once.
Can you and your group of 2 friends do something about the tech moons? So get more friends. The way you whine about it without offering any reasonable solution is what's annoying.
I'm not against some rational changes to the way moon minerals are harvested. Neither is CCP if you believe soundwave at fanfest.
Seeing that you will probably never understand, I leave you with this. Shut up woman get on my horse I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:47:00 -
[127] - Quote
Ok being frank.
Assume 99% of eve players are out for themselfs.
Now where will 99% of the population go, to the newly formed alliance/corp who is going to offer them nothing or to the all shiney alliance/corp who has ship reimbursement, logistics, even free pvp ships.
It is a utter load of BS if for one second any person posting "do somethign about it, make an alliance" think its a possible idea.
Moon Goo offers these large alliances the ISK required to actualy gain and keep numbers. Even actualy get people pvping.
At the end of the day lets be honest, who will fit a real pvpship more then once a day, go die, get podded then reship and go back for more if they arnt being offer'd some part of that honey pot?
Ask any large alliance about CTA attendance, or pvp activity even the ones with the unlimited income from moongoo have issues filling fleets. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:48:00 -
[128] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote: In a year or two you might be in a position to do something about it. The game probubly wont last another 2 years. You yourself mentioned "Risk vs Reward" moon mineing in its current state, especialy with the OTEC agreement has no risk. Therfore needs addressing. First off, it's mining. You don't need the E there(among other spelling mistakes). Secondly, if you look through the forums starting in 2003 you will find a ******** amount of posts about how EVE won't last another two years. Finally, the OTEC agreement does not remove risk. That would be like saying if you form an alliance you are removing risk from the game. Are you part of this OTEC agreement? No. Therefore(note the spelling)you are a potential risk to their moon mining. Of course in reality you are not because you won't do anything about it other than whine on the forums but hopefully you can understand the point? Another thing, just because there's an otec agreement today doesn't mean it'll be there tomorrow. People never ever ever ever ever backstab other players/corps/alliances in eve. It NEVER happens. Seriously, not even once. Can you and your group of 2 friends do something about the tech moons? So get more friends. The way you whine about it without offering any reasonable solution is what's annoying. I'm not against some rational changes to the way moon minerals are harvested. Neither is CCP if you believe soundwave at fanfest. Seeing that you will probably never understand, I leave you with this. Shut up woman get on my horse
Correcting my spelling and grammer, wow. English is my 2nd language. how many languages do you speak? |

Seraph IX Basarab
Vengance Inc.
10
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:49:00 -
[129] - Quote
While certain areas perhaps should have "geographic" advantages (more tech in the north) perhaps resources in general should be spread out a bit more. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:55:00 -
[130] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Moon Goo offers these large alliances the ISK required to actualy gain and keep numbers. Even actualy get people pvping. We were doing this well before we got tech.
Devious Relation wrote:At the end of the day lets be honest, who will fit a real pvpship more then once a day, go die, get podded then reship and go back for more if they arnt being offer'd some part of that honey pot? This is the difference in thinking between those who can actually make it in nullsec, and those who are going to stay in hisec forever. |
|

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:56:00 -
[131] - Quote
Come on, guys, stop being unfair. This neutral alt is clearly correct, there is simply no way for a group of low-skill, isk-starved new players in lowsec to grow and survive long enough to challenge an established alliance. I mean, it's just impossible, no one has ever done it. And if you inadvertently pissed off a huge coalition like the CFC, and they decide that they want you dead? Well, you're dead, there's no way you could survive if a huge ******* corp was trying to destroy you, it's impossible. They would smear you across their windshield like the bugs you are. And let's say you DID survive, somehow, maybe even made a couple of friends to form an alliance with. It's not like you could actually WIN! I mean, a huge alliance like that in practically invincible, it would take forever. Yeah, that's it, you'd need a Forever War, you know how hard that would be?
And that's why there are no goons in Eve. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:01:00 -
[132] - Quote
Goons are a group formed outside of eve via SA forums which you have to pay $10 to join. So although you were trying to troll with your reply there, you are correct. The only way CFC or any of the large powerhouses that are currently in existance will be knocked off thier perch is by internal issues, nothing anyone outside the diplomats/alliance highbee's can perform |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
905
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:02:00 -
[133] - Quote
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:Come on, guys, stop being unfair. This neutral alt is clearly correct, there is simply no way for a group of low-skill, isk-starved new players in lowsec to grow and survive long enough to challenge an established alliance. I mean, it's just impossible, no one has ever done it. And if you inadvertently pissed off a huge coalition like the CFC, and they decide that they want you dead? Well, you're dead, there's no way you could survive if a huge ******* corp was trying to destroy you, it's impossible. They would smear you across their windshield like the bugs you are. And let's say you DID survive, somehow, maybe even made a couple of friends to form an alliance with. It's not like you could actually WIN! I mean, a huge alliance like that in practically invincible, it would take forever. Yeah, that's it, you'd need a Forever War, you know how hard that would be?
And that's why there are no goons in Eve. BoB crushed us. Actually, GSF is just BoB in disguise.
Surprise! You're back under SirMolle's thumb ! Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:11:00 -
[134] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Goons are a group formed outside of eve via SA forums which you have to pay $10 to join. I haven't paid $10.
Devious Relation wrote:The only way CFC or any of the large powerhouses that are currently in existance will be knocked off thier perch is by internal issues, nothing anyone outside the diplomats/alliance highbee's can perform Goons/CFC aren't invincible just because a portion of us are members of the SA forums. And, again, if you took your sentence and replace CFC with NC, BOB, etc, you'd end up with exactly the same thing people were saying a few years ago, and that's been proven wrong.
CFC'll be killed off at some point in the future as well, the question is just when, and by whom. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
905
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:12:00 -
[135] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Goons/CFC aren't invincible just because a portion of us are members of the SA forums. And, again, if you took your sentence and replace CFC with NC, BOB, etc, you'd end up with exactly the same thing people were saying a few years ago, and that's been proven wrong.
CFC'll be killed off at some point in the future as well, the question is just when, and by whom. It'll be the highsec miners. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:19:00 -
[136] - Quote
I'm just going to point out that we already collapsed in a flurry of trolling and recriminations, losing all our territory because our CEO got pissy. We all had to move to lowsec to lick our wounds. Now we are invincible again.
A big alliance trying to destroy us won't succeed, because we won't go away due to our ships being blown up. An internal division won't destroy us, because we won't go away due to a major setback. We won't go away as long as we're having fun.
To destroy GoonSwarm, you must destroy Eve. Our will to power will conquer anything else. |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:25:00 -
[137] - Quote
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:I'm just going to point out that we already collapsed in a flurry of trolling and recriminations, losing all our territory because our CEO got pissy. We all had to move to lowsec to lick our wounds. Now we are invincible again.
A big alliance trying to destroy us won't succeed, because we won't go away due to our ships being blown up. An internal division won't destroy us, because we won't go away due to a major setback. We won't go away as long as we're having fun.
To destroy GoonSwarm, you must destroy Eve. Our will to power will conquer anything else.
^^ sadly i think this is the first accurate thing a goon has posted in thsi thread |

Arya Greywolf
Tasty Beverage
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:27:00 -
[138] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:The fact that the entire eve comminty is full of hypocrites. Well the vast majority.
This whole game is about the rich staying rich and trying to opress and keep the poor new guys poor. Its rediculious, the game should have fair oportunitys for everyone not just the long term stayin's
Gah, can't fight the urge... I thought we solved this problem.
R-I-diculous |

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:27:00 -
[139] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Doctor Benway Kado wrote:I'm just going to point out that we already collapsed in a flurry of trolling and recriminations, losing all our territory because our CEO got pissy. We all had to move to lowsec to lick our wounds. Now we are invincible again.
A big alliance trying to destroy us won't succeed, because we won't go away due to our ships being blown up. An internal division won't destroy us, because we won't go away due to a major setback. We won't go away as long as we're having fun.
To destroy GoonSwarm, you must destroy Eve. Our will to power will conquer anything else. ^^ sadly i think this is the first accurate thing a goon has posted in thsi thread It also makes your whining about how taking us out would be too hard particularly laughable. You won't find any sympathy here. We've been there. We've been through worse, even. And we won. Meanwhile, you've done nothing and complained that nothing has happened. So (everyone say it with me!)...
HTFU. |

Malak Dawnfire
27th Gallentean Fleet
90
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:30:00 -
[140] - Quote
HTFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    |
|

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:38:00 -
[141] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Now where will 99% of the population go, to the newly formed alliance/corp who is going to offer them nothing or to the all shiney alliance/corp who has ship reimbursement, logistics, even free pvp ships.
This is a problem to be figured out. What did Goons do when they first joined eve? Built themselves up to where they are now, right? Making friends, learning how to play (badly). The CC didn't get to where it is today without making friends along the way. So why don't you do the same thing? Convince people in game (not here on the forums, because they don't care enough), that Goons are a threat to your very lives, and get them together and go do something about them. After all, when BoB said that the Goons weren't allowed to play eve, what did Goons do? |

Devious Relation
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:50:00 -
[142] - Quote
HTFU? No ill remain squishy if i wish.
The longer the issue goes unchanged the worse it will be. The less and less likely it is that the scales can or will be tipped. The only hope i guess is that once everyone becomes blue, people will get bored. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 20:52:00 -
[143] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:HTFU? No ill remain squishy if i wish.
The longer the issue goes unchanged the worse it will be. The less and less likely it is that the scales can or will be tipped. The only hope i guess is that once everyone becomes blue, people will get bored.
I hate to say it, but I guess that sucks for you. It's getting fixed, it isn't getting rushed, and when it comes out it will put that massive moon income into the hands of the average players instead of alliance wallets. |

Jonah Gravenstein
438
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 02:06:00 -
[144] - Quote
Lets face it, Goons=Content, I only see a few other groups that produce as much content for the community to enjoy or hate.
They have no master plan, what they do have is that they take a mischievous delight in messing with people on a large scale and some particularly deviant planners that will one day do well in gov't service or banking.
Their propaganda is both amusing and effective, politics really does drive the whole game and they're good at it, and like politicians they have no morals in game, particularly when it comes to somebody else space pixels.
I've seen Goons described as Marmite, most apt. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 03:51:00 -
[145] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Lets face it, Goons=Content, I only see a few other groups that produce as much content for the community to enjoy or hate. They have no master plan, what they do have is that they take a mischievous delight in messing with people on a large scale and some particularly deviant planners that will one day do well in gov't service or banking. Their propaganda is both amusing and effective, politics really does drive the whole game and they're good at it, and like politicians they have no morals in game, particularly when it comes to somebody else space pixels. I've seen Goons described as Marmite, most apt.
Another apt analogy for Goons are the Orks from WH40K.
Wikipedia wrote:Ork culture circulates around seemingly random violence, which dominates every aspect of their culture. However, to characterize it as evil, malicious, or racist is to ignore the fact that it is in their nature. Most competitive activities amongst fellow Orks end in death. In fact, most activities Orks engage in involve death. This may be a byproduct of the rather brutal 40K universe, however, and it is possible that behavioral conditioning of Orks could result in a more placid lifeform.
Ork behavior is dominated by the WAAAAAGH!, a gestalt psychic field they generate that affects the Ork psyche, as it allows Orks to instinctively recognize who is 'bigga N' Dead Killy' and therefore in charge, which also feeds into the physiological expressions of success. All Orks generate this field, and it grows stronger as the Orks enjoy themselves, generally while fighting. The WAAAAAGH! helps give momentum (and the name) to the Orks' planet-crushing WAAAAAGH!s. These WAAAAAGH!s are a cross between a mass migration, holy war, looting party and pub brawl, with a bit of genocide thrown in for good measure. Millions of Orks will gather together, drawn to the power of a single dominant Ork called a Warboss, who are essentially extremely successful Ork Nobs, distinguished from most Nobs thanks to their higher level of intelligence, many qualifying as geniuses even by human standards (which is not to say that Warbosses are always intelligent; some are simply too big, too green, and too strong to be resisted), though their lack of education can often lead their enemies to assume their stupidity (which is usually the last mistake they make). Once assembled into a huge mass, consisting of hundreds of millions or even billions of Orks and their countless ramshackle vehicles and spacecraft, the Orks will set off to find an enemy to fight - any enemy. Ork Waaagh!s will sweep whole planetary systems away and destroy armies and fleets in tides of bloodlust and carnage, and only once the Orks have killed every available enemy will they start to fight amongst themselves again. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 04:33:00 -
[146] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Another apt analogy for Goons are the Orks from WH40K. I thought we were chaos space marines or something? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

TheButcherPete
Specter Syndicate Persona Non Gratis
202
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 04:36:00 -
[147] - Quote
Nice forumalt. Also, living in 0.0 is the greatest risk you can take in EVE, people can TAKE the O-TEC moons, Every system that a Tech moon sits in is NOT highsec. If you're so pissed off about Tech prices, go kill one of the pos. The fact that you're sitting behind the highsec fence and bitching about tech moons is hilarious.
If people were pissed about Tech prices enough, they'd do something to change them. Until then, stfu. The Tech Nerf is incoming, just be patient. If you decide to quit this "game", can I has your stuff? My moncole doubles as a cigarette lighter, a flashlight, a laser and x-ray goggles. If you haven't noticed yet, I'm in love with Punkturis. -á-á-á
|

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 04:50:00 -
[148] - Quote
TheButcherPete wrote:Nice forumalt. Also, living in 0.0 is the greatest risk you can take in EVE, people can TAKE the O-TEC moons, Every system that a Tech moon sits in is NOT highsec. If you're so pissed off about Tech prices, go kill one of the pos. The fact that you're sitting behind the highsec fence and bitching about tech moons is hilarious.
If people were pissed about Tech prices enough, they'd do something to change them. Until then, stfu. The Tech Nerf is incoming, just be patient. If you decide to quit this "game", can I has your stuff?
They're pissed because they literally can't take them, despite trying many, many time. Our logi guys are just too good, our pilots are just too ready to shoot up some -A-. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
907
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 05:48:00 -
[149] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:TheButcherPete wrote:Nice forumalt. Also, living in 0.0 is the greatest risk you can take in EVE, people can TAKE the O-TEC moons, Every system that a Tech moon sits in is NOT highsec. If you're so pissed off about Tech prices, go kill one of the pos. The fact that you're sitting behind the highsec fence and bitching about tech moons is hilarious.
If people were pissed about Tech prices enough, they'd do something to change them. Until then, stfu. The Tech Nerf is incoming, just be patient. If you decide to quit this "game", can I has your stuff? They're pissed because they literally can't take them, despite trying many, many time. Our logi guys are just too good, our pilots are just too ready to shoot up some -A-. They know that little Probe sitting next to those repping carriers has 500+ CFC members on the other side sitting on a titan.
~blobbers~ Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:37:00 -
[150] - Quote
Lets face it, the game is so broken I think CCP havwe just accepted the fact it is past repair |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
1011
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 12:50:00 -
[151] - Quote
I had fun in incursions, but to be completely frank CCP's modification were a direct nuke from orbit. The only thing that is left now is a hollow ruin of what used to be.
This coming from a "veteran" incursion runner, FC, former BTL operator and "griefing" incursion pilot. Hands down it was a really bad modification by CCP. I mean take a look at the incursion reports, they can only keep one of the incursions in highsec running at anytime. When there used to be 3 up earlier with 100 % blue influence.
Snap. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 15:49:00 -
[152] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:Lets face it, the game is so broken I think CCP havwe just accepted the fact it is past repair So quit, but before you do can I haz ur stuffs? "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 15:49:00 -
[153] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:I had fun in incursions, but to be completely frank CCP's modification were a direct nuke from orbit. The only thing that is left now is a hollow ruin of what used to be.
This coming from a "veteran" incursion runner, FC, former BTL operator and "griefing" incursion pilot. Hands down it was a really bad modification by CCP. I mean take a look at the incursion reports, they can only keep one of the incursions in highsec running at anytime. When there used to be 3 up earlier with 100 % blue influence.
Snap. So, working as intended? "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 15:50:00 -
[154] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:sweetrock wrote:Lets face it, the game is so broken I think CCP havwe just accepted the fact it is past repair So quit, but before you do can I haz ur stuffs?
Oh yeah sure, just give me your home address and telephone number ill be sure to "let you have it" |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 16:15:00 -
[155] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:Mortimer Civeri wrote:sweetrock wrote:Lets face it, the game is so broken I think CCP havwe just accepted the fact it is past repair So quit, but before you do can I haz ur stuffs? Oh yeah sure, just give me your home address and telephone number ill be sure to "let you have it" So tell me again why you complain about a game that is "broken beyond repair," refuse to quit said game, and make RL threats against people who ask you to quit because you seem unhappy with the game?
Because I would consider this:
sweetrock wrote:...give me your home address and telephone number ill be sure to "let you have it" a RL personal threat.
Oh, and enjoy your ban. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 17:23:00 -
[156] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:sweetrock wrote:Mortimer Civeri wrote:sweetrock wrote:Lets face it, the game is so broken I think CCP havwe just accepted the fact it is past repair So quit, but before you do can I haz ur stuffs? Oh yeah sure, just give me your home address and telephone number ill be sure to "let you have it" So tell me again why you complain about a game that is "broken beyond repair," refuse to quit said game, and make RL threats against people who ask you to quit because you seem unhappy with the game? Because I would consider this: sweetrock wrote:...give me your home address and telephone number ill be sure to "let you have it" a RL personal threat. Oh, and enjoy your ban.
Oh right your "that" guy |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
207
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 18:06:00 -
[157] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:Ammzi wrote:I had fun in incursions, but to be completely frank CCP's modification were a direct nuke from orbit. The only thing that is left now is a hollow ruin of what used to be.
This coming from a "veteran" incursion runner, FC, former BTL operator and "griefing" incursion pilot. Hands down it was a really bad modification by CCP. I mean take a look at the incursion reports, they can only keep one of the incursions in highsec running at anytime. When there used to be 3 up earlier with 100 % blue influence.
Snap. So, working as intended?
I can see your happy as competition to Goon tech moon income has been removed.
Now if only they could get Goon tech moon income working as intended.
Unless, of course, it already is. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 18:10:00 -
[158] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:competition to Goon tech moon income The what? |

Nikodiemus
Jokulhlaup
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 18:13:00 -
[159] - Quote
Tinnin Sylph wrote:When even WIDOT can tell you how dumb you are you know you're in all kinds of trouble.
Quoting for truth and justice. Terrible inputs, terrible posters, terrible people, terrible corplliance, and BFF. And drunks, lots of drunks. Less now though.....
TBH though I could care less about Tec nonsense but all those poor useless moons sitting idly makes me sad. Make more moons viable and mats useful instead of crying over spilt cartel breast milk. |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:08:00 -
[160] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Mortimer Civeri wrote:Ammzi wrote:I had fun in incursions, but to be completely frank CCP's modification were a direct nuke from orbit.
The only thing that is left now is a hollow ruin of what used to be. This coming from a "veteran" incursion runner, FC, former BTL operator and "griefing" incursion pilot. Hands down it was a really bad modification by CCP. I mean take a look at the incursion reports, they can only keep one of the incursions in highsec running at anytime. When there used to be 3 up earlier with 100 % blue influence. Snap. So, working as intended? I can see your happy as competition to Goon tech moon income has been removed. Now if only they could get Goon tech moon income working as intended. Unless, of course, it already is. They fought for it, and defend it,. Let em have it, or take some from them. YOUR CHOICE! As to the easy and virtually RISK FREE ISK faucet that was Incursions before the "tweek", I say good riddance. To much reward for to little risk. Flooding ISK into the economy, from Incursion rewards, wasn't doing the eve economy any good.
Before you say that Tech is an ISK faucet, I want you to show me the blueprint that turns tech into ISK. Until CCP changes things, Yea, working as intended, go cry in the corner with the other forum babies, crying about Goons and tech. HTFU or GTFO, Meanwhile I'm going to invent more projectile guns to sell. Hopefully to both sides of whatever conflict is going on because IDGAF about Goons, tech, or Incursions getting nerfed. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|
|

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:11:00 -
[161] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Mortimer Civeri wrote:Ammzi wrote:I had fun in incursions, but to be completely frank CCP's modification were a direct nuke from orbit.
The only thing that is left now is a hollow ruin of what used to be. This coming from a "veteran" incursion runner, FC, former BTL operator and "griefing" incursion pilot. Hands down it was a really bad modification by CCP. I mean take a look at the incursion reports, they can only keep one of the incursions in highsec running at anytime. When there used to be 3 up earlier with 100 % blue influence. Snap. So, working as intended? I can see your happy as competition to Goon tech moon income has been removed. Now if only they could get Goon tech moon income working as intended. Unless, of course, it already is. They fought for it, and defend it,. Let em have it, or take some from them. YOUR CHOICE! As to the easy and virtually RISK FREE ISK faucet that was Incursions before the "tweek", I say good riddance. To much reward for to little risk. Flooding ISK into the economy, from Incursion rewards, wasn't doing the eve economy any good. Before you say that Tech is an ISK faucet, I want you to show me the blueprint that turns tech into ISK. Until CCP changes things, Yea, working as intended, go cry in the corner with the other forum babies, crying about Goons and tech. HTFU or GTFO, Meanwhile I'm going to invent more projectile guns to sell. Hopefully to both sides of whatever conflict is going on because IDGAF about Goons, tech, or Incursions getting nerfed.
You jsut said it yourself, you dont give a F about incursions goons or tech, so please reframe from posting in threads which are specificaly started to talk about them. If you dont have a opinion because you dont give a F then dont post. SImple
Maybe go make a thread about "inventing guns" |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
207
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:11:00 -
[162] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Mortimer Civeri wrote:Ammzi wrote:I had fun in incursions, but to be completely frank CCP's modification were a direct nuke from orbit.
The only thing that is left now is a hollow ruin of what used to be. This coming from a "veteran" incursion runner, FC, former BTL operator and "griefing" incursion pilot. Hands down it was a really bad modification by CCP. I mean take a look at the incursion reports, they can only keep one of the incursions in highsec running at anytime. When there used to be 3 up earlier with 100 % blue influence. Snap. So, working as intended? I can see your happy as competition to Goon tech moon income has been removed. Now if only they could get Goon tech moon income working as intended. Unless, of course, it already is. They fought for it, and defend it,. Let em have it, or take some from them. YOUR CHOICE! As to the easy and virtually RISK FREE ISK faucet that was Incursions before the "tweek", I say good riddance. To much reward for to little risk. Flooding ISK into the economy, from Incursion rewards, wasn't doing the eve economy any good. Before you say that Tech is an ISK faucet, I want you to show me the blueprint that turns tech into ISK. Until CCP changes things, Yea, working as intended, go cry in the corner with the other forum babies, crying about Goons and tech. HTFU or GTFO, Meanwhile I'm going to invent more projectile guns to sell. Hopefully to both sides of whatever conflict is going on because IDGAF about Goons, tech, or Incursions getting nerfed.
My my, Goon boy, where is the snarky punk now?
Are you worried your unearned wealth will be taken away?
You claim you fought for it, but did you really? And was that fight REALLY risky enough to justify your reward?
I say that you DID NOT earn that much wealth, and it should be removed TODAY.
About 1/4 your current tech moon income would be fair, I think.
Risk/Reward baby, Risk/Reward.
|

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:20:00 -
[163] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Are you worried your unearned wealth will be taken away? How can he be worried about something happening which we've been advocating for years already?
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:You claim you fought hard for it, but did you really? And was that fight REALLY risky enough to justify your reward? Yes, we have, and yes, it was.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:I say that you DID NOT earn that much wealth, and it should be removed TODAY. You know where our moons are, come and take them if you think CCP isn't working quickly enough for you.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:About 1/4 your current tech moon income would be fair, I think. I'm pretty sure you'll keep whining even if we went further down than that. |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:22:00 -
[164] - Quote
[quote=Lord Zim][You know where our moons are, come and take them if you think CCP isn't working quickly enough for you. [quote]
Whats wrong there zim zimmety zim zim zaroooooooo all that blueball getting boring?? |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:24:00 -
[165] - Quote
What blueball? |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
757
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:31:00 -
[166] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:So CCP have "balanced" incursions due to "risk vs isk" or thats the stand they will take on this, not going to go into details.
I have recently just been made aware of this "O-Tec" agreement between TEST, Raiden, CFC, PL, NCDot which basicaly means, who ever owns the tec moons currently will keep them. Now this simple agreement has completely removed the risk from owning such moons and therefore needs adressing.
The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL
Now this o-tec agreement is in place, i think that should be nuked from orbit
This agreement effects 90% of the tech moons, how are new commers, the smaller corps/alliances ment to even get started? Its things like this that put new people off and eventualy will be the death of the game
I don't think you realize the amount of isk, effort, risk and time that went into getting the Tech we hold.
Really, I don't think you grasp the months of diplomacy, agreements and work leadership went though to properly keep some entities blue, others neut.
I don't think you get the amount of capital ships, fuel used and ammo to shoot all those structures. The trillions in isk spent in reimbursements for the fights we had to capture the income. I don't think you get the whole risk vs. reward thing nor effort vs. reward in this game.
Incursions =/= effort or risk. It's a horrible comparison.
And yeah, now that we've taken it. We will use space politics and build an empire to protect it and keep it.
A list of fixes for the new inventory
Dual Pane idea clicky |

Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
36
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:32:00 -
[167] - Quote
Ziranda Hakuli wrote:I agree the moons...and i mean ALL of them need to be looked at but sadly the ideas that CCP has i feel will not come into affect till winter expansion.......and that's if we a freakin lucky.
We all know that the Tech moons were the answers to the R64 moons. North vs South moons. what CCP did is that who ever it was got an ego trip and hilmar went along with as they both had their heads up each other's ass.
what should have been done is simple. I know they got a program that auto seeds the moon and sets in the data base. makes life easy. Reset the moons where there is a balance of moon goo and and Tech moons in all of 0.0 space, easiest fix they can do now and **** off all the 0.0 alliances at the same time.
when the winter expansion rolls around and the new bling bling of shield statics when there is an impact on them will be an awsome time to implement Ring Mining.....yes be an awsome way to remove the risk of moon mining to a risky mining operation with the Exhumers.
Yes that means you 0.0 carebear cousins would need to find miners to gather this. I will have no problem mining the stuff but i am not paying you to be there or be blue. you are paying me!
I agree that the moons need to be reevaluated. I personally think that they should all slowly deplete and then need to be rescanned to discover what else is available to be mined. Maybe make it so that when the moon is surveyed, it tells you what the moons composition is XX% this, YY% that etc. Might also be a good idea to make the moons composed in large majority by ores that are available in the system with smaller quantities of the more valuable typical moon mining resources. However, I also think that if moons were to be composed of primarily ores, every moon should have a composition (rather than many having nothing worth exploiting) and any ore extraction should be handled more like PI than the moon harvesting we have now (which is still how I feel the rarer resources should be harvested). Quit Crying and Just Suck It Up |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:36:00 -
[168] - Quote
Alaekessa wrote:I personally think that they should all slowly deplete and then need to be rescanned to discover what else is available to be mined. Sounds like a recipe for even higher moongoo prices. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
969
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:39:00 -
[169] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Are you worried your unearned wealth will be taken away?
You claim you fought hard for it, but did you really? And was that fight REALLY risky enough to justify your reward?
I say that you DID NOT earn that much wealth, and it should be removed TODAY.
About 1/4 your current tech moon income would be fair, I think.
Risk/Reward baby, Risk/Reward.
Since it's unearned and not REALLY risky enough to justify the reward, what about you go there and take it?
I mean, you pictured a walk in the park, it should not be hard, shouldn't it? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:43:00 -
[170] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:You jsut said it yourself, you dont give a F about incursions goons or tech, so please reframe from posting in threads which are specificaly started to talk about them. If you dont have a opinion because you dont give a F then dont post. SImple
Maybe go make a thread about "inventing guns" I like to point out the stupid, whiny, crybabies, {like you} and laugh. "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|
|

Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
36
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:51:00 -
[171] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Alaekessa wrote:I personally think that they should all slowly deplete and then need to be rescanned to discover what else is available to be mined. Sounds like a recipe for even higher moongoo prices.
Yes, it does. However, if it worked out the way I'm imagining it, it would distribute that wealth among a larger percentage of the population as well as making OTECH obsolete (unless of course they wanted to go around and scan EVERY moon in EVERY system and make their operation nomadic).
Yes, prices would rise, but what happens when that Tech moon you are sitting on depletes and you find that you're now stuck with Atmospheric Gases/1? Also, imagine how ecstatic Joe Schmoe Newguy becomes when he realizes that he's just struck the motherload in Ingunn?
Higher prices? Yes. Overall beneficial to the playerbase? IMHO, Yes. Quit Crying and Just Suck It Up |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:56:00 -
[172] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:sweetrock wrote:You jsut said it yourself, you dont give a F about incursions goons or tech, so please reframe from posting in threads which are specificaly started to talk about them. If you dont have a opinion because you dont give a F then dont post. SImple
Maybe go make a thread about "inventing guns" I like to point out the stupid, whiny, crybabies, {like you} and laugh. 
whats that word...... oh yeah hypocrite |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:57:00 -
[173] - Quote
Pretty certain a more palatable solution for everyone is an expansion of alchemy to deal with R32s as well, along with maybe ringmining (if CCP are still actually going to implement that). |

Caecilia Arene
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:00:00 -
[174] - Quote
I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else.
How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day . |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:01:00 -
[175] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Pretty certain a more palatable solution for everyone is an expansion of alchemy to deal with R32s as well, along with maybe ringmining (if CCP are still actually going to implement that).
Havent heard about alchemy R32's, sounds like something from WoW or other stick and board rpgs. However i do agree with ringmining. |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:02:00 -
[176] - Quote
Caecilia Arene wrote:I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else. How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day  .
The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implamented.
If you have a twinge do you go to the doctor? no you ignore it.
Cut your arm off however thats another story |

Caecilia Arene
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:08:00 -
[177] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else. How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day  . The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implemented... Yes and no. It's easier to identify the issue but a lot harder to come up with a viable alternative to something which has been in the game and thus the economy forever.
Push too hard and we may all end up with a half arsed solution which doesn't help anyone .
|

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:10:00 -
[178] - Quote
Caecilia Arene wrote:sweetrock wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else. How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day  . The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implemented... Yes and no. It's easier to identify the issue but a lot harder to come up with a viable alternative to something which has been in the game and thus the economy forever. Push too hard and we may all end up with a half arsed solution which doesn't help anyone  .
Yes i do agree with you its such a massive part of the game it would require doing correctly. Just look at CCP's meat fisted approach to incursions. Luckily for them that was only a few people they put thier nose out, but do that to the whole ecconomy could be another story |

Caecilia Arene
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:20:00 -
[179] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:sweetrock wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else. How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day  . The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implemented... Yes and no. It's easier to identify the issue but a lot harder to come up with a viable alternative to something which has been in the game and thus the economy forever. Push too hard and we may all end up with a half arsed solution which doesn't help anyone  . Yes i do agree with you its such a massive part of the game it would require doing correctly. Just look at CCP's meat fisted approach to incursions. Luckily for them that was only a few people they put thier nose out, but do that to the whole ecconomy could be another story Exactly. I'm not an industrialist but from what I know the moon goo is the basis for T2 production. Stuff that up and there'll be chaos.
I absolutely agree, in principle, that passive income like this has to be removed to something exploration. However, the chances for catastrophe is much higher than in most new enhancements or fixes.
That being said, "Get to it CCP!". 
EDIT: Grammer |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:20:00 -
[180] - Quote
Caecilia Arene wrote:sweetrock wrote:The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implemented... Yes and no. It's easier to identify the issue but a lot harder to come up with a viable alternative to something which has been in the game and thus the economy forever. Push too hard and we may all end up with a half arsed solution which doesn't help anyone  . Ring-miningageddon.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
|

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:48:00 -
[181] - Quote
Caecilia Arene wrote:I absolutely agree, in principle, that passive income like this has to be removed to something exploration. However, the chances for catastrophe is much higher than in most new enhancements or fixes. Which of these activities are passive, and order them in the order of passivity, least passive first:
Planetary Interaction Mining Moon mining Datacores Ratting Moon reaction Mission |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:55:00 -
[182] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I absolutely agree, in principle, that passive income like this has to be removed to something exploration. However, the chances for catastrophe is much higher than in most new enhancements or fixes. Which of these activities are passive, and order them in the order of passivity, least passive first: Planetary Interaction Mining Moon mining Datacores Ratting Moon reaction Mission
OOOoOoo oOo oOOo oO oOoO oO o Oo o oooOooOOOo a game!!!
Datacores Moonmining PI moon reacion? - not familiar with this mining mission ratting
However the way i have prioritised the list changes significantly with the over abundance of bots on this game. |

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:58:00 -
[183] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I absolutely agree, in principle, that passive income like this has to be removed to something exploration. However, the chances for catastrophe is much higher than in most new enhancements or fixes. Which of these activities are passive, and order them in the order of passivity, least passive first: Planetary Interaction Mining Moon mining Datacores Ratting Moon reaction Mission
You forgot production |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:29:00 -
[184] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Are you worried your unearned wealth will be taken away?
You claim you fought hard for it, but did you really? And was that fight REALLY risky enough to justify your reward?
I say that you DID NOT earn that much wealth, and it should be removed TODAY.
About 1/4 your current tech moon income would be fair, I think.
Risk/Reward baby, Risk/Reward.
Since it's unearned and not REALLY risky enough to justify the reward, what about you go there and take it? I mean, you pictured a walk in the park, it should not be hard, shouldn't it?
The first step to that is me receiving the few trillion in unearned ISK you received from the moons.
When Goons took the moons, the piled up wealth did not exist. Because the tech moons had only just been created, and tech wasn't nearly as expensive. Even Goons can't take moons from established players without CCP nerfing Titans for them.
I know, I know, you play dumb and I don't call you on it.
Oh, and un-nerf titans and then you can re-fight that Alliance you took the moons from. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:33:00 -
[185] - Quote
Caecilia Arene wrote:sweetrock wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else. How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day  . The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implemented... Yes and no. It's easier to identify the issue but a lot harder to come up with a viable alternative to something which has been in the game and thus the economy forever. Push too hard and we may all end up with a half arsed solution which doesn't help anyone  .
You mean like what they did to Incursions and Data Cores?
Let me propose a simple solution that could be implemented TOMORROW and would be no worse than the current mess.
Randomly distribute tech moons across all of Player Controlled Null Sec. Each system has an equal chance of having a tech moon if it has moons.
There. Done.
Oh boy, that was SOOOOOOO hard. And you know what? After spending the ten or less man hours to implement it, I don't think CCP could change it again. I mean, it would be like set in stone. Or something.
Or not. |

Tallon Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:34:00 -
[186] - Quote
Wow you're pretty mad about us winning EVE and being ridiculously space rich aren't you.
|

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:35:00 -
[187] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: Are you worried your unearned wealth will be taken away?
You claim you fought hard for it, but did you really? And was that fight REALLY risky enough to justify your reward?
I say that you DID NOT earn that much wealth, and it should be removed TODAY.
About 1/4 your current tech moon income would be fair, I think.
Risk/Reward baby, Risk/Reward.
Since it's unearned and not REALLY risky enough to justify the reward, what about you go there and take it? I mean, you pictured a walk in the park, it should not be hard, shouldn't it? The first step to that is me receiving the few trillion in unearned ISK you received from the moons. When Goons took the moons, the piled up wealth did not exist. Because the tech moons had only just been created, and tech wasn't nearly as expensive. Even Goons can't take moons from established players without CCP nerfing Titans for them. I know, I know, you play dumb and I don't call you on it. Oh, and un-nerf titans and then you can re-fight that Alliance you took the moons from.
Who is calling for the un-nerfing of titans, except for the people who have been whining about the nerf since it was announced?
Also, who has been calling for the nerfing of the tech moon bottleneck since before it started? |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:35:00 -
[188] - Quote
Tallon Sylph wrote:Wow you're pretty mad about us winning EVE and being ridiculously space rich aren't you.
We are what we are.
I get mad.
Goons lie about everything.
People are who they are. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:37:00 -
[189] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:sweetrock wrote:Caecilia Arene wrote:I seriously think everyone knows the issues. The people involved, those who like the status quo, those against, CCP and just about everyone else. How many threads do we need on the issue? Going on 3 a day  . The more threads there are the more likely a speedy solution is implemented... Yes and no. It's easier to identify the issue but a lot harder to come up with a viable alternative to something which has been in the game and thus the economy forever. Push too hard and we may all end up with a half arsed solution which doesn't help anyone  . You mean like what they did to Incursions and Data Cores? Let me propose a simple solution that could be implemented TOMORROW and would be no worse than the current mess. Randomly distribute tech moons across all of Player Controlled Null Sec. Each system has an equal chance of having a tech moon if it has moons. There. Done. Oh boy, that was SOOOOOOO hard. And you know what? After spending the ten or less man hours to implement it, I don't think CCP could change it again. I mean, it would be like set in stone. Or something. Or not.
Did you know that when we lived in Delve we were rich in moon income? Then CCP rebalanced the moons and Delve wasn't worth it anymore. But we stayed there for a while until the whole "not paying bills" thing happened. Then we moved around a bunch, after a year or so we have ended up with even more moons than we know what to do with, besides ruin the T2 economy. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:37:00 -
[190] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:
Who is calling for the un-nerfing of titans, except for the people who have been whining about the nerf since it was announced?
Also, who has been calling for the nerfing of the tech moon bottleneck since before it started?
I'm a little old to fall for the "I want to do something but I just can't" lie. So many people pull this and it is very boring at this point.
If Mittens wanted a REAL fix, he would propose an actual solution. That is, put forward a proposal on how to fix it.
But that would cause problems with denying responsibility(lying) while claming you want the problem fixed(more lying).
By the way, when are all Goons going to be banned for RMT? |
|

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:37:00 -
[191] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Tallon Sylph wrote:Wow you're pretty mad about us winning EVE and being ridiculously space rich aren't you.
We are what we are. I get mad. Goons lie about everything. People are who they are.
Tell me a Goon lie, Jessie. Whisper it in my ear. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:38:00 -
[192] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: By the way, when are all Goons going to be banned for RMT?
Who is lying? |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:39:00 -
[193] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Did you know that when we lived in Delve we were rich in moon income? Then CCP rebalanced the moons and Delve wasn't worth it anymore. But we stayed there for a while until the whole "not paying bills" thing happened. Then we moved around a bunch, after a year or so we have ended up with even more moons than we know what to do with, besides ruin the T2 economy.
Because they were all put in one place.
No way did that happen randomly either.
I also imagine they were placed in an area that would easily be taken over to.
How nice. |

Tallon Sylph
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:39:00 -
[194] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote: By the way, when are all Goons going to be banned for RMT?
The day you make a good post.
|

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:40:00 -
[195] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: By the way, when are all Goons going to be banned for RMT?
Who is lying?
Why don't you read my posts on this thread if you are so very curious. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:42:00 -
[196] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Alia Gon'die wrote:Did you know that when we lived in Delve we were rich in moon income? Then CCP rebalanced the moons and Delve wasn't worth it anymore. But we stayed there for a while until the whole "not paying bills" thing happened. Then we moved around a bunch, after a year or so we have ended up with even more moons than we know what to do with, besides ruin the T2 economy. Because they were all put in one place. No way did that happen randomly either. I also imagine they were placed in an area that would easily be taken over to. How nice.
Jesus Christ, you're really stuck on this aren't you? The nullsec political landscape changed SO MUCH between the moon change and when we created OTEC, how could anyone think that far ahead through so many unknown decisions made by so many other people?
Was it mind control? Are all nullsec players really just alts of Mittani? |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:43:00 -
[197] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: By the way, when are all Goons going to be banned for RMT?
Who is lying? Why don't you read my posts on this thread if you are so very curious.
I have been reading your posts. It was a rhetorical question. It is obvious to EVERYBODY after reading your posts to see who is lying. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:44:00 -
[198] - Quote
Tallon Sylph wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: By the way, when are all Goons going to be banned for RMT?
The day you make a good post.
We cannot count on this to happen. We need a court order to declare incompetency in order to get this poor man the help he needs. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:46:00 -
[199] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Now where will 99% of the population go, to the newly formed alliance/corp who is going to offer them nothing or to the all shiney alliance/corp who has ship reimbursement, logistics, even free pvp ships. This is a problem to be figured out. What did Goons do when they first joined eve? Built themselves up to where they are now, right? Making friends, learning how to play (badly). The CC didn't get to where it is today without making friends along the way. So why don't you do the same thing? Convince people in game (not here on the forums, because they don't care enough), that Goons are a threat to your very lives, and get them together and go do something about them. After all, when BoB said that the Goons weren't allowed to play eve, what did Goons do?
Here is where you are lying yourself, Goonie.
You claim to believe that when you took the Tech Moons...... when Tech was way cheaper and Titans were actually rare, is the same game as today.
The established wealth and established fleets defending the Tech Moons today are vastly, vastly larger than when you took the Tech Moons.
If Goonies of two years ago where thrown into the game of today they would never take the Tech Moons. AS YOU WELL KNOW.
The Goons of today can't even take Tech Moons from other major alliances without CCP nerfing Titans. As you well know.
So even the Goonies of today couldn't "grow" and "take some moons".... much less Goons without all the established wealth their tech moons gave them.
So that would be where you are lying honey. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:47:00 -
[200] - Quote
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what happens when people like Jessie-A take the wrong pills when they get up in the morning. |
|

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:51:00 -
[201] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Here is where you are lying yourself, Goonie.
You claim to believe that when you took the Tech Moons...... when Tech was way cheaper and Titans were actually rare, is the same game as today.
The established wealth and established fleets defending the Tech Moons today are vastly, vastly larger than when you took the Tech Moons.
If Goonies of two years ago where thrown into the game of today they would never take the Tech Moons. AS YOU WELL KNOW.
The Goons of today can't even take Tech Moons from other major alliances without CCP nerfing Titans. As you well know.
So even the Goonies of today couldn't "grow" and "take some moons".... much less Goons without all the established wealth their tech moons gave them.
So that would be where you are lying honey.
Having lived through most of the history of 0.0 I can safely say that every single superpower in EVE has had the same thing said against them and all of them have fallen. Titans were nerfed because they were game breaking not because goons told CCP to do something. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
208
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:53:00 -
[202] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Here is where you are lying yourself, Goonie.
You claim to believe that when you took the Tech Moons...... when Tech was way cheaper and Titans were actually rare, is the same game as today.
The established wealth and established fleets defending the Tech Moons today are vastly, vastly larger than when you took the Tech Moons.
If Goonies of two years ago where thrown into the game of today they would never take the Tech Moons. AS YOU WELL KNOW.
The Goons of today can't even take Tech Moons from other major alliances without CCP nerfing Titans. As you well know.
So even the Goonies of today couldn't "grow" and "take some moons".... much less Goons without all the established wealth their tech moons gave them.
So that would be where you are lying honey.
Having lived through most of the history of 0.0 I can safely say that every single superpower in EVE has had the same thing said against them and all of them have fallen. Titans were nerfed because they were game breaking not because goons told CCP to do something.
That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons? |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:56:00 -
[203] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Alia Gon'die wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Now where will 99% of the population go, to the newly formed alliance/corp who is going to offer them nothing or to the all shiney alliance/corp who has ship reimbursement, logistics, even free pvp ships. This is a problem to be figured out. What did Goons do when they first joined eve? Built themselves up to where they are now, right? Making friends, learning how to play (badly). The CC didn't get to where it is today without making friends along the way. So why don't you do the same thing? Convince people in game (not here on the forums, because they don't care enough), that Goons are a threat to your very lives, and get them together and go do something about them. After all, when BoB said that the Goons weren't allowed to play eve, what did Goons do? Here is where you are lying yourself, Goonie. You claim to believe that when you took the Tech Moons...... when Tech was way cheaper and Titans were actually rare, is the same game as today. The established wealth and established fleets defending the Tech Moons today are vastly, vastly larger than when you took the Tech Moons. If Goonies of two years ago where thrown into the game of today they would never take the Tech Moons. AS YOU WELL KNOW. The Goons of today can't even take Tech Moons from other major alliances without CCP nerfing Titans. As you well know. So even the Goonies of today couldn't "grow" and "take some moons".... much less Goons without all the established wealth their tech moons gave them. So that would be where you are lying honey.
Actually I don't know that. How do you know that? When we lost Delve we had our membership, we had our SP, and we had some ships. Not much else. And yet we still managed to band together and get to where we are today.
Of course there is no use trying to convince a person who can declare all facts to be lies. I know a few people who do that. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:57:00 -
[204] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Here is where you are lying yourself, Goonie.
You claim to believe that when you took the Tech Moons...... when Tech was way cheaper and Titans were actually rare, is the same game as today.
The established wealth and established fleets defending the Tech Moons today are vastly, vastly larger than when you took the Tech Moons.
If Goonies of two years ago where thrown into the game of today they would never take the Tech Moons. AS YOU WELL KNOW.
The Goons of today can't even take Tech Moons from other major alliances without CCP nerfing Titans. As you well know.
So even the Goonies of today couldn't "grow" and "take some moons".... much less Goons without all the established wealth their tech moons gave them.
So that would be where you are lying honey.
Having lived through most of the history of 0.0 I can safely say that every single superpower in EVE has had the same thing said against them and all of them have fallen. Titans were nerfed because they were game breaking not because goons told CCP to do something. That is another Goon lie. Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB.... their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
Was that what killed Bob? I'm pretty sure it was their disbanding, then the month long camp of their cap fleet in one single station that did that. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:58:00 -
[205] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Having lived through most of the history of 0.0 I can safely say that every single superpower in EVE has had the same thing said against them and all of them have fallen. Titans were nerfed because they were game breaking not because goons told CCP to do something. If I had a dollar for every time I've told Jessie-A exactly that, I'd be a rich man. But since I'm "A Goon", I'm automatically lying.
Except I haven't lied about a single thing here. vOv |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:04:00 -
[206] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote: That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
Was that what killed Bob? I'm pretty sure it was their disbanding, then the month long camp of their cap fleet in one single station that did that.
Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf.
So why didn't that happen?
Oh. Light bulb. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:05:00 -
[207] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? |

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:08:00 -
[208] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf.
So why didn't that happen?
Oh. Light bulb.
BoB was disbanded by a member of BoBs leadership. The result of months of infighting. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:08:00 -
[209] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic?
The logic that one person couldn't really click their heels together and cause an empire to lose control of all its' territory?
It was clear abuse of a game bug.
I mean really, it's logically insane that one "traitor" could magically cause a nation to suddenly "not have sov" over itself. How? He has a really, really long talk with the local police in a few thousand systems and they all decide "they no longer answer to BoB"?
So they would "patch the bug"(which they really should have done anyway) and then regrant Sov.
In fact, they should have done this.
But wait, who was BoB fighting at the time?
Oh. Light bulb. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:10:00 -
[210] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? The logic that one person couldn't really click their heels together and cause an empire to lose control of all its' territory? I mean really, it's logically insane that one "traitor" could magically cause a nation to suddenly "not have sov" over itself. How? He has a really, really long talk with the local police in a few thousand systems and they all decide "they no longer answer to BoB"? What? Oh, I'm sorry, here I thought you were one of those who wanted EVE to be a dangerous place, with actual risk.
I guess you just wanted easier ganking after all. |
|

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:11:00 -
[211] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? The logic that one person couldn't really click their heels together and cause an empire to lose control of all its' territory? I mean really, it's logically insane that one "traitor" could magically cause a nation to suddenly "not have sov" over itself. How? He has a really, really long talk with the local police in a few thousand systems and they all decide "they no longer answer to BoB"? What? Oh, I'm sorry, here I thought you were one of those who wanted EVE to be a dangerous place, with actual risk. I guess you just wanted easier ganking after all.
I don't want the blatant abuse of a poor corporation interface to replace actual fights, no.
Of course, without such hacks, Goons wouldn't be doing so well, would they?
|

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:11:00 -
[212] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
I am refering to BoB, the NC, TRI (the first one all the way to the fifth) ASCN, MC, Red Alliance, C02 ect ect. All of them were seen as invincible at some point and all of them collapsed. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:13:00 -
[213] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
I am refering to BoB, the NC, TRI (the first one all the way to the fifth) ASCN, MC, Red Alliance, C02 ect ect. All of them were seen as invincible at some point and all of them collapsed.
I could look up their history and see where they reformed under other names, but I have to eat.
Those reading can decide whether you are a trustworthy and believable person.
What I said for BoB still stands unanswered by the way. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:14:00 -
[214] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? The logic that one person couldn't really click their heels together and cause an empire to lose control of all its' territory? I mean really, it's logically insane that one "traitor" could magically cause a nation to suddenly "not have sov" over itself. How? He has a really, really long talk with the local police in a few thousand systems and they all decide "they no longer answer to BoB"? What? Oh, I'm sorry, here I thought you were one of those who wanted EVE to be a dangerous place, with actual risk. I guess you just wanted easier ganking after all. I don't want the blatant abuse of a poor corporation interface to replace actual fights, no. Of course, without such hacks, Goons wouldn't be doing so well, would they? BoB's lost Sov through an exploit. Period.
If a CEO can't delegate responsibility to "trusted" members, then what can he do? Would you like to have the decision to disband be done by committee? |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:14:00 -
[215] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:I don't want the blatant abuse of a poor corporation interface to replace actual fights, no.
Of course, without such hacks, Goons wouldn't be doing so well, would they? Don't worry, BOB were being defeated at the time anyways. As was mentioned earlier, sirmolle made a tactical error and got locked into PR- for a ... while, and in the meantime their entire space got razed to the ground.
But I guess "facts" are "lies" in your current sperg state. vOv |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:14:00 -
[216] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf.
So why didn't that happen?
Oh. Light bulb.
BoB was disbanded by a member of BoBs leadership. The result of months of infighting. Their own person pushed the button. That's what's hilarious about it.
*push* Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:14:00 -
[217] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? The logic that one person couldn't really click their heels together and cause an empire to lose control of all its' territory? It was clear abuse of a game bug. I mean really, it's logically insane that one "traitor" could magically cause a nation to suddenly "not have sov" over itself. How? He has a really, really long talk with the local police in a few thousand systems and they all decide "they no longer answer to BoB"? So they would "patch the bug"(which they really should have done anyway) and then regrant Sov. In fact, they should have done this. But wait, who was BoB fighting at the time? Oh. Light bulb.
They were also fighting Phalanx Alliance in venal at the time. It was us, we made BoB implode and it had nothing at all to do with BoBs own leadership fighting an internal war. |

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:16:00 -
[218] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
I could look up their history and see where they reformed under other names, but I have to eat.
Those reading can decide whether you are a trustworthy and believable person.
What I said for BoB still stands unanswered by the way.
I know where most of them went and reformed into. It still doesn't alter the fact their empires crumbled. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:16:00 -
[219] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
I am refering to BoB, the NC, TRI (the first one all the way to the fifth) ASCN, MC, Red Alliance, C02 ect ect. All of them were seen as invincible at some point and all of them collapsed. I could look up their history and see where they reformed under other names, but I have to eat. Those reading can decide whether you are a trustworthy and believable person. What I said for BoB still stands unanswered by the way.
By your logic one could say that BoB's downfall was guaranteed by their joining EVE.
It's technically true, but really is beside the point. Bob lost sov over because of the disband, but then they retook sov almost immediately after under Kenzoku. They actually lost their space because of the huge blunder by the capital fleet resulting in the month-long hellcamp of PR-. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:17:00 -
[220] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote: If a CEO can't delegate responsibility to "trusted" members, then what can he do? Would you like to have the decision to disband be done by committee?
Are you suggesting that CEO's actually want "trusted" members to have the right to unilaterally disband their corporation and alliances?
Or is it the poor interface that requires this?
And yeah, I'm sure that CEO's would take "a vote required to disband corporation/alliance" than having to give every single "trusted" person that right.
It is a clear exploit of poor user interface. |
|

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:19:00 -
[221] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
I am refering to BoB, the NC, TRI (the first one all the way to the fifth) ASCN, MC, Red Alliance, C02 ect ect. All of them were seen as invincible at some point and all of them collapsed. I could look up their history and see where they reformed under other names, but I have to eat. Those reading can decide whether you are a trustworthy and believable person. What I said for BoB still stands unanswered by the way. By your logic one could say that BoB's downfall was guaranteed by their joining EVE. It's technically true, but really is beside the point. Bob lost sov over because of the disband, but then they retook sov almost immediately after under Kenzoku. They actually lost their space because of the huge blunder by the capital fleet resulting in the month-long hellcamp of PR-.
There downfall was guaranteed by their CCP friends being fired/demoted/outed.
Else the exploit would have been rolled back.
In fact, it should have been rolled back anyway.
Why wasn't it?
Who was BoB fighting at the time?
Oh. Light bulb. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:20:00 -
[222] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Alia Gon'die wrote: If a CEO can't delegate responsibility to "trusted" members, then what can he do? Would you like to have the decision to disband be done by committee?
Are you suggesting that CEO's actually want "trusted" members to have the right to unilaterally disband their corporation and alliances? Or is it the poor interface that requires this? And yeah, I'm sure that CEO's would take "a vote required to disband corporation/alliance" than having to give every single "trusted" person that right. It is a clear exploit of poor user interface.
A poor interface is not an "exploit". CCP ruled that there hadn't been any violations of the EULA or TOS. Also, you are ignoring what i said about the PR- camp. That is what really lost BoB their space. |

baltec1
1194
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:21:00 -
[223] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
There downfall was guaranteed by their CCP friends being fired/demoted/outed.
Else the exploit would have been rolled back.
In fact, it should have been rolled back anyway.
Why wasn't it?
Who was BoB fighting at the time?
Oh. Light bulb.
What exploit? |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:21:00 -
[224] - Quote
You know, I'm starting to think someone's made Jesse-A mad. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:22:00 -
[225] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
That is another Goon lie.
Many current alliances are simply the old alliances renamed. If you are referring to BoB....
their help was fired from CCP. Are you suggesting that is what is required to get rid of Goons?
I am refering to BoB, the NC, TRI (the first one all the way to the fifth) ASCN, MC, Red Alliance, C02 ect ect. All of them were seen as invincible at some point and all of them collapsed. I could look up their history and see where they reformed under other names, but I have to eat. Those reading can decide whether you are a trustworthy and believable person. What I said for BoB still stands unanswered by the way. By your logic one could say that BoB's downfall was guaranteed by their joining EVE. It's technically true, but really is beside the point. Bob lost sov over because of the disband, but then they retook sov almost immediately after under Kenzoku. They actually lost their space because of the huge blunder by the capital fleet resulting in the month-long hellcamp of PR-. There downfall was guaranteed by their CCP friends being fired/demoted/outed. Else the exploit would have been rolled back. In fact, it should have been rolled back anyway. Why wasn't it? Who was BoB fighting at the time? Oh. Light bulb.
This is literally Glenn Beck logic. You are a lost cause, I'm not arguing with you anymore. I sincerely hope you find some good psychiatric help before you really go off the deep end and hurt somebody. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:24:00 -
[226] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:You know, I'm starting to think someone's made Jesse-A mad. Hard to tell with NPC corp forum alts.. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:24:00 -
[227] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:There downfall was guaranteed by their CCP friends being fired/demoted/outed.
Else the exploit would have been rolled back.
In fact, it should have been rolled back anyway.
Why wasn't it?
Who was BoB fighting at the time?
Oh. Light bulb. This is literally Glenn Beck logic. You are a lost cause, I'm not arguing with you anymore. I sincerely hope you find some good psychiatric help before you really go off the deep end and hurt somebody. Oh oh, it was us, wasn't it !
That makes sense, actually we jacked all the T2 BPOs as well, and used BoB as the fall guy, right? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:27:00 -
[228] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Lord Zim wrote:You know, I'm starting to think someone's made Jesse-A mad. Hard to tell with NPC corp forum alts.. Nah. This is stereotypical "I'm so mad I'm literally crying blood" mad. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:29:00 -
[229] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Lord Zim wrote:You know, I'm starting to think someone's made Jesse-A mad. Hard to tell with NPC corp forum alts.. Nah. This is stereotypical "I'm so mad I'm literally crying blood" mad. It's a stereotype now?
Huh, the things you learn on EVE-O Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Foder Enaka
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 00:30:00 -
[230] - Quote
http://tagn.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/hulkageddon-technetium-and-the-circle-of-life/
|
|

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 01:22:00 -
[231] - Quote
I've seen some terrible threads in my day.
But arguing about whether BoB losing sov was CCP exploiting a mechanic to favor Goonswarm back in 2006 as part of some 5 Year Plan of Goon Domination in a thread about OTEC (not O-tech, not OTECH, not O-TEC, jesus christ) and comparing them to the recently nerfed Incursions...
This is the worst thread, posted in a terrible forum. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:11:00 -
[232] - Quote
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:I've seen some terrible threads in my day.
But arguing about whether BoB losing sov was CCP exploiting a mechanic to favor Goonswarm back in 2006 as part of some 5 Year Plan of Goon Domination in a thread about OTEC (not O-tech, not OTECH, not O-TEC, jesus christ) and comparing them to the recently nerfed Incursions...
This is the worst thread, posted in a terrible forum. No, this is an amazing thread.
Even back then, Band of Developers was actually DevSwarm. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Lord Zim
716
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:13:00 -
[233] - Quote
I'm CCP Spartacus |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:23:00 -
[234] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Alia Gon'die wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:There downfall was guaranteed by their CCP friends being fired/demoted/outed.
Else the exploit would have been rolled back.
In fact, it should have been rolled back anyway.
Why wasn't it?
Who was BoB fighting at the time?
Oh. Light bulb. This is literally Glenn Beck logic. You are a lost cause, I'm not arguing with you anymore. I sincerely hope you find some good psychiatric help before you really go off the deep end and hurt somebody. Oh oh, it was us, wasn't it ! That makes sense, actually we jacked all the T2 BPOs as well, and used BoB as the fall guy, right?
No, the people who jacked the BPOs for BoB were fired/demoted and no longer able to protect BoB.
And then, with a new group of Devs, rulings began taking another direction.
You vile retards and the cowards who suck up to you.
"Can't change tech moons 'till they got it right' ".
As if anything CCP has done in the last month indicates that they ever wait to "do something right".
There is a 40 page thread currently present in which people complain about a poorly implemented inventory system which NOBODY ASKED FOR being released before even being completely developed for no reason that I can comprehend. Did they think people were going to unsub if they didn't get their single window inventory in Inferno? Did most players even know it was coming?
Failures of that magnitude, it boggles the mind.
Clearly, being unable to "do it right" is no barrier at all to game destroying changes when the current group of Devs WANNA.
So, they don't WANNA change tech moons. The question is why.
Question. I crack myself up. |

Lord Zim
716
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:37:00 -
[235] - Quote
Look at that incoherent frothy sperg. LOOK AT IT. |

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:43:00 -
[236] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Look at that incoherent frothy sperg. LOOK AT IT.
Nope, I wasn't over-vaccinated with Thimerosal. No 'spergism here, skippy.
And no, that was a relatively minor mistake from Big Pharma.
Just a few years ago they killed a few hundred thousand Americans.
Didn't hear about it in the news? It's right in the mortality tables. How odd.
Drug introduced, sudden unexplained bump in heart attacks.
Drug banned. Sudden unexplained drop in heart attack death rate.
How is clever working out for you? |

Doctor Benway Kado
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 03:06:00 -
[237] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Nope, I wasn't over-vaccinated with Thimerosal. No 'spergism here, skippy.
And no, that was a relatively minor mistake from Big Pharma.
Just a few years ago they killed a few hundred thousand Americans.
Didn't hear about it in the news? It's right in the mortality tables. How odd.
Drug introduced, sudden unexplained bump in heart attacks.
Drug banned. Sudden unexplained drop in heart attack death rate.
How is clever working out for you?
Lord Zim wrote:Look at that incoherent frothy sperg. LOOK AT IT. |

Frying Doom
193
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 03:28:00 -
[238] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:So CCP have "balanced" incursions due to "risk vs isk" or thats the stand they will take on this, not going to go into details.
I have recently just been made aware of this "O-Tec" agreement between TEST, Raiden, CFC, PL, NCDot which basicaly means, who ever owns the tec moons currently will keep them. Now this simple agreement has completely removed the risk from owning such moons and therefore needs adressing.
The only reason incursions became relativly "risk free" was because of the awsome communitys made. THAT IS ALL
Now this o-tec agreement is in place, i think that should be nuked from orbit
This agreement effects 90% of the tech moons, how are new commers, the smaller corps/alliances ment to even get started? Its things like this that put new people off and eventualy will be the death of the game
If tech moons are the best paying moons shouldn't they really be in the most dangerous environment (As stated many times by members of Goonswarm)
Wormholes. Just move them there and that will fix the problem right up. Makes them more likely to be fought over and makes the risk vs reward fit. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
Local Channel in Null must Die. Jump Drives need Nerfing. Null is meant to be dangerous and hard. Not safe and boring. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1028
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 03:33:00 -
[239] - Quote
nullsec has far pvp & pve losses per player then wormhole space, check CCP Diagoras' stats
hth |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
913
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 04:25:00 -
[240] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Clearly, being unable to "do it right" is no barrier at all to game destroying changes when the current group of Devs WANNA.
So, they don't WANNA change tech moons. The question is why.
Question. I crack myself up. :smug:
Why bother doing anything else when this what what the forums are filled with. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
|

Frying Doom
193
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 04:31:00 -
[241] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:nullsec has far pvp & pve losses per player then wormhole space, check CCP Diagoras' stats
hth Ok well the stats From December 5th, 2007 until November 29th, 2011 are:
PVP PVE Total
High Sec 1,974,022 6,317,926 8,291,948
Low Sec 4,126,911 510,683 4,637,594
Null Sec 7,061,988 568,353 7,630,341
Wormhole 377,786 162,126 539,912
So if you argument just went on these numbers the most dangerous space is Hi-sec. Having the highest number of PvP & PvE kills totaled.
With Amamake, Jita Rancer and Tama as the most dangerous Systems before you get into Null sec and of the remaining 6 of the top 10 one is NPC null and another low sec with only 4 of the top 10 in Sov space.
Yes wormhole space is underutilized if Tech was moved there it would gain more population and fit the risk vs. reward. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
Local Channel in Null must Die. Jump Drives need Nerfing. Null is meant to be dangerous and hard. Not safe and boring. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
732
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 04:42:00 -
[242] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:nullsec has far pvp & pve losses per player then wormhole space, check CCP Diagoras' stats
hth Ok well the stats From December 5th, 2007 until November 29th, 2011 are: PVP PVE Total High Sec 1,974,022 6,317,926 8,291,948 Low Sec 4,126,911 510,683 4,637,594 Null Sec 7,061,988 568,353 7,630,341 Wormhole 377,786 162,126 539,912 So if you argument just went on these numbers the most dangerous space is Hi-sec. Having the highest number of PvP & PvE kills totaled. With Amamake, Jita Rancer and Tama as the most dangerous Systems before you get into Null sec and of the remaining 6 of the top 10 one is NPC null and another low sec with only 4 of the top 10 in Sov space. Yes wormhole space is underutilized if Tech was moved there it would gain more population and fit the risk vs. reward.
Yes because its easy to get the freighters in and out of wormholes (you see tech is pretty big and requires large vessels to move around, you'd understand this if you literally had any idea what you're talking about).
If people are upset about the price spikes now, move it all in wormholes and watch how fast it climbs, 500 million isk hacs all day long.
Also since wormholes are completely broken in that once a group fully moves into a wormhole and fortifies it they're nearly impossible to ever get out, the problem you have with the current tech holders would be compounded and magnified by the new tech holders.
At the end of the day its ok for you to admit that you're jealous of what other players worked a year and more to create, but at least understand enough about the game to know whats a good idea and what isn't (none of your ideas were good).
|

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
466
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 04:47:00 -
[243] - Quote
wow it's almost like you don't understand what the "per player" qualifier entails eh |

Frying Doom
193
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 04:50:00 -
[244] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Yes because its easy to get the freighters in and out of wormholes (you see tech is pretty big and requires large vessels to move around, you'd understand this if you literally had any idea what you're talking about).
If people are upset about the price spikes now, move it all in wormholes and watch how fast it climbs, 500 million isk hacs all day long.
Also since wormholes are completely broken in that once a group fully moves into a wormhole and fortifies it they're nearly impossible to ever get out, the problem you have with the current tech holders would be compounded and magnified by the new tech holders.
At the end of the day its ok for you to admit that you're jealous of what other players worked a year and more to create, but at least understand enough about the game to know whats a good idea and what isn't (none of your ideas were good).
Well at least you seem to disagree with the other Null sec residents. They don't seem to believe there is a difference between Null and Wormhole space besides the loss of local.
And you are right I honestly know little about tech moons other than they have one again caused a bottleneck in production.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
Local Channel in Null must Die. Jump Drives need Nerfing. Null is meant to be dangerous and hard. Not safe and boring. |

sweetrock
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 09:59:00 -
[245] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:I'm CCP Spartacus
Where is the pit of death when you need to kick someone into it?
No wait, different movie? |

Lord Zim
717
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:24:00 -
[246] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Well at least you seem to disagree with the other Null sec residents. They don't seem to believe there is a difference between Null and Wormhole space besides the loss of local. There are minor issues such as mass limits and the need for finding new entrances when they either run out of time or out of mass, but they're small enough hindrances that there are more than enough people who mine ABCs to their heart's content, compress the ore and ship it to k-space regularly.
Frying Doom wrote:And you are right I honestly know little about tech moons other than they have one again caused a bottleneck in production. You know "goons have them" and want to do anything to get to the state where "goons don't have them". Anything, except actually take them away from us, of course, because that requires effort. |

Lord Zim
717
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:25:00 -
[247] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:Lord Zim wrote:I'm CCP Spartacus Where is the pit of death when you need to kick someone into it? No wait, different movie? Yeah, I'm the one slipping **** in ass of Illithya instead. |

Frying Doom
197
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:54:00 -
[248] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Well at least you seem to disagree with the other Null sec residents. They don't seem to believe there is a difference between Null and Wormhole space besides the loss of local. There are minor issues such as mass limits and the need for finding new entrances when they either run out of time or out of mass, but they're small enough hindrances that there are more than enough people who mine ABCs to their heart's content, compress the ore and ship it to k-space regularly. Frying Doom wrote:And you are right I honestly know little about tech moons other than they have one again caused a bottleneck in production. You know "goons have them" and want to do anything to get to the state where "goons don't have them". Anything, except actually take them away from us, of course, because that requires effort. Wrong actually moving them or keeping them there will only alter the current cost increase for a small time before something else occurs to increase prices. The moons are not the problem.
If you ever read anything other than your own manifesto you would be aware is that all I would like to see is a more dynamic Null sec and a more successful game.
You may now continue to sit in a corner, hissing and spitting. Yelling Mine all Mine. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
Local Channel in Null must Die. Jump Drives need Nerfing. Null is meant to be dangerous and hard. Not safe and boring. |

GallowsCalibrator
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 12:29:00 -
[249] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Look at that incoherent frothy sperg. LOOK AT IT. Nope, I wasn't over-vaccinated with Thimerosal. No 'spergism here, skippy. And no, that was a relatively minor mistake from Big Pharma. Just a few years ago they killed a few hundred thousand Americans. Didn't hear about it in the news? It's right in the mortality tables. How odd. Drug introduced, sudden unexplained bump in heart attacks. Drug banned. Sudden unexplained drop in heart attack death rate. How is clever working out for you?
Oh my god you're literally a ranting, raving conspiracy theorist. That's, just... wow. How about that magic bullet, eh? |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
56
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 12:38:00 -
[250] - Quote
hilmar killed JFK |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
919
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 14:17:00 -
[251] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Frying Doom wrote:And you are right I honestly know little about tech moons other than they have one again caused a bottleneck in production. You know "goons have them" and want to do anything to get to the state where "goons don't have them". Anything, except actually take them away from us, of course, because that requires effort. Well CCP is doing it, so you don't really need to put all that much effort into whining at them.
But I hear it helps, so do your best. Perhaps you might make more threads on this topic, to raise public awareness. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |