Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 30 .. 31 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

Cede Forster
Graffa
5
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:25:00 -
[571] - Quote
$ 200 for a (virtual) t-shirt and now everyone can wear get one for "free" ?
What an atrocity, my outrage can bearly be contained, if there only was something one could do about it.
Except buying t-shirts for $ 200 of course, that would be just a stupid solution.
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:29:00 -
[572] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Cat Casidy wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Weaselior wrote:the antiquarian, fresh off another round of humiliating himself, pulls out the "im rich irl so clearly i can't be as dumb as anyone who can read has concluded" card again
like before, it is made out of crayon and has stains from juice spills on it I am just providing an appropriate response for a fool who keeps insisting that I am an idiot. You and your Goon pals are so funny. I think the problem with people like this is that they're so stupid that they have no idea how stupid they are. -John Cleese yeah i am sort of stumped at this point because every time i think he couldn't embarrass himself more he goes and does it
I find myself in this fascinating situation where if I were in real life, I would've never talked to a sort of trailer trash like you, but this great game of EVE brings all of us together so that we can whine and moan at each other. It's great.
You can keep calling me stupid or idiot or whatever you can think of. Once again, the 10,058 Goon tear that I was able to generate with a no-name alt, fuels me and keeps me motivated.
Goons, much appreciated for the continued interest in this thread and bumping em. |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
775
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:54:00 -
[573] - Quote
I really see no need for personal insults here. If you cannot be civil, then perhaps you should use the very handy little block function that CCP have given us so that you do not have to see certain people posting. At the rate you are going this thread will be locked and you will end up getting a warning, I'm pretty certain that will not help anyone. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:57:00 -
[574] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really see no need for personal insults here. If you cannot be civil, then perhaps you should use the very handy little block function that CCP have given us so that you do not have to see certain people posting. At the rate you are going this thread will be locked and you will end up getting a warning, I'm pretty certain that will not help anyone.
Could you kindly examine the first 10 pages or so? I tried to be civil and calm but after days/weeks of having to endure personal insults from hundreds of people, I guarantee you that even Jesus couldn't handle this kind of stress.
It only requires a single response from CCP DEVS regarding how they will be making an appropriate reparation for the disadvantaged parties, and an absolute guarantee that they won't screw up with other historical items for future marketing promotion. Once ALL the demands are met, I don't see why this thread shouldn't be locked.
CCP promised us that he would provide a response a week ago. A week ago. I had to contact another CCP Dev, to find out that they are still working on a solution. |

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
97
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 16:01:00 -
[575] - Quote
So wait CCp removed game items from players with out reinbursement?
CCP remove T2BPO make EVE real. Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
775
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 16:06:00 -
[576] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really see no need for personal insults here. If you cannot be civil, then perhaps you should use the very handy little block function that CCP have given us so that you do not have to see certain people posting. At the rate you are going this thread will be locked and you will end up getting a warning, I'm pretty certain that will not help anyone. Could you kindly examine the first 10 pages or so? I tried to be civil and calm but after days/weeks of having to endure personal insults from hundreds of people, I guarantee you that even Jesus couldn't handle this kind of stress. It only requires a single response from CCP DEVS regarding how they will be making an appropriate reparation for the disadvantaged parties, and an absolute guarantee that they won't screw up with other historical items for future marketing promotion. Once ALL the demands are met, I don't see why this thread shouldn't be locked. CCP promised us that he would provide a response a week ago. A week ago. I had to contact another CCP Dev, to find out that they are still working on a solution.
If their language concerns you, then use the report function. Resorting to verbal abuse and baseless insults just because others choose to is a poor excuse sir. You have other lines of communication to CCP open to you, and yet you choose to continue posting in a thread where you know people will attempt to goad you into an argument.
It could be said that you were doing so on purpose, and thus any future complaint you might make regarding the behaviour of other posters would be void. Do yourself a favour, either block those people whose opinions or words cause you distress or report them to CCP.
As for making demands, perhaps you should make requests instead, that way people might be less inclined to ignore you. Having worked in customer services in varying positions and in many different sectors of business, I personally would be much less likely to help someone who behaved in the manner you are displaying here. Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8395
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 16:07:00 -
[577] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Could you kindly examine the first 10 pages or so? I tried to be civil and calm GǪand avoided to really respond to questions and arguments. You're also being quite overtly antagonistic by claiming that it's GǣmalpracticeGǥ when it is perhaps the most commonly used sales pitch in the book.
If you're getting stressed about people disagreeing with your demands, then you have bigger problems than not getting compensation for a free itemGǪ
Quote:It only requires a single response from CCP DEVS regarding how they will be making an appropriate reparation for the disadvantaged parties, and an absolute guarantee that they won't screw up with other historical items for future marketing promotion. GǪand in the meantime, you can explain how you're GÇ£disadvantagedGÇ¥ and why it counts as a screw-up. It's not like it's particularly strange that promotional items later become available to all and sundry (in fact, CCP has done exactly that on a number of occasions, and since it's the nature of promotional items, it didn't really come as a surprise to anyone). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 16:08:00 -
[578] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Cutter Isaacson wrote:I really see no need for personal insults here. If you cannot be civil, then perhaps you should use the very handy little block function that CCP have given us so that you do not have to see certain people posting. At the rate you are going this thread will be locked and you will end up getting a warning, I'm pretty certain that will not help anyone. Could you kindly examine the first 10 pages or so? I tried to be civil and calm but after days/weeks of having to endure personal insults from hundreds of people, I guarantee you that even Jesus couldn't handle this kind of stress. It only requires a single response from CCP DEVS regarding how they will be making an appropriate reparation for the disadvantaged parties, and an absolute guarantee that they won't screw up with other historical items for future marketing promotion. Once ALL the demands are met, I don't see why this thread shouldn't be locked. CCP promised us that he would provide a response a week ago. A week ago. I had to contact another CCP Dev, to find out that they are still working on a solution. If their language concerns you, then use the report function. Resorting to verbal abuse and baseless insults just because others choose to is a poor excuse sir. You have other lines of communication to CCP open to you, and yet you choose to continue posting in a thread where you know people will attempt to goad you into an argument. It could be said that you were doing so on purpose, and thus any future complaint you might make regarding the behaviour of other posters would be void. Do yourself a favour, either block those people whose opinions or words cause you distress or report them to CCP. As for making demands, perhaps you should make requests instead, that way people might be less inclined to ignore you. Having worked in customer services in varying positions and in many different sectors of business, I personally would be much less likely to help someone who behaved in the manner you are displaying here.
You are absolutely right. I lost my sight for a while. I didn't even know that "blocking" function existed on EVE forum. Much appreciated for the advice. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8395
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 16:14:00 -
[579] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:So wait CCp removed game items from players with out reinbursement? No. They started selling a previous free item for modest price without reimbursing those who got it for freeGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3813
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 17:05:00 -
[580] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote: I find myself in this fascinating situation where if I were in real life, I would've never talked to a sort of trailer trash like you, but this great game of EVE brings all of us together so that we can whine and moan at each other. It's great.
guys guys guys i'm rich, really
why doesn't anyone believe me |
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3813
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 17:06:00 -
[581] - Quote
"i have a really hot girlfriend but she's from canada you wouldnt know her" |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1562
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 17:14:00 -
[582] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:So wait CCp removed game items from players with out reinbursement? No. They started selling a previous free item for modest price without reimbursing those who got it for freeGǪ
..and than after acknowledging it was done in error have yet to let those affected know what to expect.
Mr Epeen 
There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8395
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 17:16:00 -
[583] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:..and than after acknowledging it was done in error have yet to let those affected know what to expect. GǪand the question remains: why should they expect any kind of compensation for an item that they received for free?
The fair thing to do would be to let the suckers who bought it for AUR have their AUR back and keep the shirt so everyone paid the same price for it.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1562
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 17:21:00 -
[584] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:..and than after acknowledging it was done in error have yet to let those affected know what to expect. GǪand the question remains: why should they expect any kind of compensation for an item that they received for free?
That's your question and it's unimportant and meaningless.
The only thing that is important is when will CCP do as they said they would.
Mr Epeen 
There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8395
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 17:36:00 -
[585] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:That's your question and it's unimportant and meaningless. Not really no. It's the question CCP is trying to answer. Providing a good argument for some kind of compensation seems like a rather clever thing to do if you're interesting in receiving that compensation.
If the question is unimportant and meaningless, then that's your answer right there: the compensation is zero and they're not going to bother to comment on it because it's such a complete non-issue. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1252
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 18:32:00 -
[586] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Weaselior wrote:Cat Casidy wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Weaselior wrote:the antiquarian, fresh off another round of humiliating himself, pulls out the "im rich irl so clearly i can't be as dumb as anyone who can read has concluded" card again
like before, it is made out of crayon and has stains from juice spills on it I am just providing an appropriate response for a fool who keeps insisting that I am an idiot. You and your Goon pals are so funny. I think the problem with people like this is that they're so stupid that they have no idea how stupid they are. -John Cleese yeah i am sort of stumped at this point because every time i think he couldn't embarrass himself more he goes and does it I find myself in this fascinating situation where if I were in real life, I would've never talked to a sort of trailer trash like you, but this great game of EVE brings all of us together so that we can whine and moan at each other. It's great. You can keep calling me stupid or idiot or whatever you can think of. Once again, the 10,058 Goon tear that I was able to generate with a no-name alt, fuels me and keeps me motivated. Goons, much appreciated for the continued interest in this thread and bumping em.
grats on your 15 minutes of fame
you're still nobody of note a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1252
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 18:33:00 -
[587] - Quote
"I'm a superstar accountant with a kickboxing girlfriend and a ferrari I devote my plentiful spare time to ousting internet tyrants and buying virtual clothing" a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1253
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 18:38:00 -
[588] - Quote
"I also think that plex purchased in-game from the market are created out of thin air" a rogue goon |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 23:12:00 -
[589] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:
grats on your 15 minutes of fame
Hahaha you are a sad individual. I don't care about the so-called "15 minutes of fame." Obviously, extracting 10,058 Goons Tears was priceless, but I did so because unlike you guys, I actually care about this game and how it is perceived by the greater gaming communities. When we leave EVE to Goons' leadership, the only thing that will happen is to alienate potential new joiners in the long-run. Just like how you think that it was unfair of CCP to "push the bus" on Mittani the Great for enticing thousands of players to convince a mentally unstable person to commit suicide, while laughing at those who were disenfranchised by CCP's actual mistake.
Once again, 10,058 Goons Tears fuels me and gives me the daily strength to overcome Goons nonsense and completely unnecessary personal attacks. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
511
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 23:23:00 -
[590] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:..and than after acknowledging it was done in error have yet to let those affected know what to expect. GǪand the question remains: why should they expect any kind of compensation for an item that they received for free? The fair thing to do would be to let the suckers who bought it for AUR have their AUR back and keep the shirt so everyone paid the same price for it. 
A question that none of us are obligated to answer because CCP already promised some kind fo reparation.
Even if your "keychain concept" is correct, there is this other issue that CCP needs to resolve where dozens, if not, hundreds of players, paid 1.5B-2B for Ishukone Special Edition Shirt in order to use it for their avatar, only to see the pricing go down to 0.02B when CCP introduced them via NeX Store. CCP already admitted that it was a mistake and they find it just that some kind of compensation for those disenfranchised parties are in order.
CCP makes changes to various features of the game all the time that simultaneously affect pricing of certain items by 10% here and 20% there, but having to deprive collectors of many billions is something that a reputable company shouldn't do. |
|
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
1532

|
Posted - 2012.07.07 00:14:00 -
[591] - Quote
Off topic and trolling removed.
There is no need for any discussions that the release of the Ishukone shirt was a mistake and shouldn't have happened, CCP t0rfifrans stated that already in clear words.
I would like to remind everyone to stay polite and constructive in their replies, forum rule violations and personal attacks will not be allowed. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Mechael
Ouroboros Executor Collective
164
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 00:25:00 -
[592] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Mechael wrote:Fair would be the removal of Aurum from EVE. Just sayin'. That is a pathetic answer. There is nothing wrong with Aurum system. It provides additional cash inflow for CCP while having absolutely no impact on the pre-existing capusleers' gameplay. It is a system only for those who are willing to spend their own money purely for cosmetic purpose. Do you think having CCP rely on "almost free-to-play" model by allowing capsuleers to fund their own subscription via ISK, sustainable in the long run? More cash inflow => Higher valuation of the company => the cost of capital goes down for both, equity and debt => better financing options from willing banks and other investors => more employees, more gameplay, more expansions, more Dust, more WoD, more EVE Online, more compensated CCP employees, more quality contents => Win-Win situation for all the stakeholders.Don't just think about the short-term. Think about what is best for EVE Online and CCP in the long-run for Christ's sake.
Quality is greater than quantity. EVE is an interactive science fiction simulator and a sandbox style game. It is self-evident why microtransactions are bad for such an environment. What I see with Aurum is CCP being short-sighted in its belief that microtransactions will make it more money and thus be good for EVE, at the expense of the long-term integrity of the simulation and sandbox.
I hold that anyone who advocates or uses Aurum is careless in at least one of two ways. Either they haven't followed the ramifications of such a system on a sandbox/simulation through to its almost immediately obvious conclusion, or else they just plain don't care beyond getting their kicks right now.
Microtransactions move EVE from the awesome scifi-simulator/sandbox realm, and into the realm of cheap arcade games (just pump in another quarter ...) or Zynga games. It's a move from meaningful to vapid. By supporting it, you've picked up the snake and opened the door to all sorts of nastiness, including situations like your current one. Congratulations. Whether or not you win the game matters not. -áIt's if you bought it. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
230
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 01:14:00 -
[593] - Quote
Mechael wrote: Quality is greater than quantity. EVE is an interactive science fiction simulator and a sandbox style game. It is self-evident why microtransactions are bad for such an environment. What I see with Aurum is CCP being short-sighted in its belief that microtransactions will make it more money and thus be good for EVE, at the expense of the long-term integrity of the simulation and sandbox.
I personally don't see how aurum has any further effect on the integrity of the game than plex already does.
Mechael wrote: I hold that anyone who advocates or uses Aurum is careless in at least one of two ways. Either they haven't followed the ramifications of such a system on a sandbox/simulation through to its almost immediately obvious conclusion, or else they just plain don't care beyond getting their kicks right now.
And what are the ramifications you are seeing? It is entirely possible I'm being totally naive in this, but I'm not seeing any foregone conclusions as of yet.
Mechael wrote: Microtransactions move EVE from the awesome scifi-simulator/sandbox realm, and into the realm of cheap arcade games (just pump in another quarter ...) or Zynga games. It's a move from away from meaningful and towards vapid. By supporting it, you've picked up the snake and opened the door to all sorts of nastiness, including situations like your current one. Congratulations.
We have a choice of believing CCP in their statement that they will do no game affecting MT's or not. If you believe there is intentional deceit and the intention is for this to move from an inconsequential cash shop to a P2W cash shop then there is no reason to remain here. It's true that it could be a case of boiling the frog, but then it falls to each player to determine at what point from an absolute standard to call it quits. Until we start seeing some actual moves in that direction it may be too early to officially declare that any MT is the downfall of the game.
I would also think that a true simulation of a "sifi world" would have taken into account propensities for seemingly vapid and meaningless actions and obsessions. But I suppose that comes back down to the argument between a Eve as a "spaceship game" or "scifi game."
And you are right about quality over quantity, but additional funding can be great assistance in both. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
230
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 01:22:00 -
[594] - Quote
Tippia wrote: It's not like it's particularly strange that promotional items later become available to all and sundry (in fact, CCP has done exactly that on a number of occasions, and since it's the nature of promotional items, it didn't really come as a surprise to anyone).
As my own time here is shorter than many others, I can't recall a point in time when an actual promotional item was made so widely available as was the case here. Some of the gift ships and items were made obtainable in crucible or as part of other offers, but to my recollection those were originally granted just for being active at the time and were not designed to entice a separate or additional purchase.
Is there another incident I'm forgetting or perhaps something that occurred prior to my being in game? |

Mechael
Ouroboros Executor Collective
164
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 01:30:00 -
[595] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Mechael wrote: Quality is greater than quantity. EVE is an interactive science fiction simulator and a sandbox style game. It is self-evident why microtransactions are bad for such an environment. What I see with Aurum is CCP being short-sighted in its belief that microtransactions will make it more money and thus be good for EVE, at the expense of the long-term integrity of the simulation and sandbox.
I personally don't see how aurum has any further effect on the integrity of the game than plex already does. Mechael wrote: I hold that anyone who advocates or uses Aurum is careless in at least one of two ways. Either they haven't followed the ramifications of such a system on a sandbox/simulation through to its almost immediately obvious conclusion, or else they just plain don't care beyond getting their kicks right now.
And what are the ramifications you are seeing? It is entirely possible I'm being totally naive in this, but I'm not seeing any foregone conclusions as of yet. Mechael wrote: Microtransactions move EVE from the awesome scifi-simulator/sandbox realm, and into the realm of cheap arcade games (just pump in another quarter ...) or Zynga games. It's a move from away from meaningful and towards vapid. By supporting it, you've picked up the snake and opened the door to all sorts of nastiness, including situations like your current one. Congratulations.
We have a choice of believing CCP in their statement that they will do no game affecting MT's or not. If you believe there is intentional deceit and the intention is for this to move from an inconsequential cash shop to a P2W cash shop then there is no reason to remain here. It's true that it could be a case of boiling the frog, but then it falls to each player to determine at what point from an absolute standard to call it quits. Until we start seeing some actual moves in that direction it may be too early to officially declare that any MT is the downfall of the game. I would also think that a true simulation of a "sifi world" would have taken into account propensities for seemingly vapid and meaningless actions and obsessions. But I suppose that comes back down to the argument between a Eve as a "spaceship game" or "scifi game." And you are right about quality over quantity, but additional funding can be great assistance in both.
It already is pay-to-win (read: pay for an advantage) and has been since the inclusion of PLEX. I groaned about that, too. Aurum takes it a step further by generating in-game items (vanity or otherwise is largely irrelevant to the principal alone) from thin air, predominantly coming from those with the cash to spend. The ramifications of this are inherently only slightly more dire than the fact that EVE itself is still based on a faucet/sink system*. However, when placed on top of the already fundamentally flawed notion that a faucet/sink system has any place in a simulator it is a clear indication that EVE is moving even further away from a deep simulator and towards a casual, pump-in-your-quarter, get your kicks and **** the rest style game.
Basically, CPP is adding even more systems that fly in the face of the notion that EVE is a sci-fi simulator when they should be rectifying the systems that already do this. Fix the problems, don't compound them.
As to drawing my line in the sand ... I'll stop playing the moment there's a better persistant world, interactive, science fiction simulator out there. If CCP keeps going in the direction it is with microtransactions, pretty soon that'll basically mean I'll switch to the very next one that's released as EVE will hardly qualify anymore.
As to how this is relevant, well ... when you buy into such a system, you should know the system well enough to see exactly what it is that you're buying. The OP clearly did not, and I'm pretty sure he still does not.
*Note that the faucet/sink system is only the most predominant issue in regards to the simulation. There are too many other issues to list, so I just stuck with the most blatant. Whether or not you win the game matters not. -áIt's if you bought it. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1566
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 01:33:00 -
[596] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Off topic and trolling removed. There is no need for any discussions that the release of the Ishukone shirt was a mistake and shouldn't have happened, CCP t0rfifrans stated that already in clear words. I would like to remind everyone to stay polite and constructive in their replies, forum rule violations and personal attacks will not be allowed.
Thanks for reminding us that that post exists.
He also stated in that same post:Quote:Now that it is out and there is an issue with people that had the shirt prior as a coveted rare collectors item, we have suspended sales on the ishukone shirt while we formulate a plan that's as fair to as many as possible. Expect an update later today on the issue.
I might politely mention that "later today" is long past and we have yet to hear anything. This is the concern that the non trolls have been trying to get an answer to.
Would you be so kind as to supply us with the reason we have not heard anything?
Mr Epeen 
There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Mechael
Ouroboros Executor Collective
164
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 01:44:00 -
[597] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: I would also think that a true simulation of a "sifi world" would have taken into account propensities for seemingly vapid and meaningless actions and obsessions. But I suppose that comes back down to the argument between a Eve as a "spaceship game" or "scifi game."
If anyone here thinks EVE is just a spaceship game, they clearly haven't been paying attention since the beginning. Ambulation (finally halfway realized and marred by a silly MT scheme,) in-atmo flying (hasn't actually been realized yet, unless you're counting DUST vehicles,) planetary interaction, and now DUST as well ... it may have began as just spaceships, but it had to start somewhere. Whether or not you win the game matters not. -áIt's if you bought it. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
230
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 02:04:00 -
[598] - Quote
Mechael wrote: It already is pay-to-win (read: pay for an advantage) and has been since the inclusion of PLEX. I groaned about that, too. Aurum takes it a step further by generating in-game items (vanity or otherwise is largely irrelevant to the principal alone) from thin air, predominantly coming from those with the cash to spend. The ramifications of this are inherently only slightly more dire than the fact that EVE itself is still based on a faucet/sink system*. However, when placed on top of the already fundamentally flawed notion that a faucet/sink system has any place in a simulator it is a clear indication that EVE is moving even further away from a deep simulator and towards a casual, pump-in-your-quarter, get your kicks and **** the rest style game..
While I can partially agree with some of your sentiment, I think the fact that the Nex items are spawned out of thin air is and needs to be inextricably linked to their functional uselessness. the fact that no game system or mechanic contributes to their creation is countered and justified by the fact that they have no affect in return. So long as this is maintained I see little issue in Aurum or Nex (though admittedly I'm abit more apprehensive about ship customization as it seems in my mind to come closer to crossing that ever blurry line).
Regarding sinks and faucets, I'd always thought of this as a mechanism to account for the shortfalls of the simulation. Perhaps to counter missing factors such as a lack constant technological advancement of upkeep and the purposeful prevention of items falling toward obsolescence. |

Mechael
Ouroboros Executor Collective
164
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 02:29:00 -
[599] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: the fact that no game system or mechanic contributes to their creation is countered and justified by the fact that they have no affect in return.
But they do have an effect. No part of the game is completely separate from the rest of the game. It all adds up to define what EVE is. The only reason EVE is currently afloat and doing as well as it is is because it has no serious competitors. When one does crop up, and actually takes the simulation aspect seriously, EVE may very well be in trouble. Moving forward with DUST will help mitigate that fear, but it also brings EVE even closer to ceasing to fall into that category altogether thanks to DUST's total reliance on microtransactions.
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Regarding sinks and faucets, I'd always thought of this as a mechanism to account for the shortfalls of the simulation. Perhaps to counter missing factors such as a lack constant technological advancement of upkeep and the purposeful prevention of items falling toward obsolescence.
More things that need fixing.  Whether or not you win the game matters not. -áIt's if you bought it. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
72
|
Posted - 2012.07.07 02:58:00 -
[600] - Quote
Mechael wrote:It already is pay-to-win (read: pay for an advantage) and has been since the inclusion of PLEX.
Eh, don't see what's the big deal is with PLEX tbh, you could already sell GTCs for isk before they added PLEX into the game (and people still do), the only thing PLEX did was to make things simpler and create the occasional lol-killmail.
And if you stretch the definition of pay-to-win to include any sort of "advantage", then the ability to run multiple accounts is also P2W... and so is the ability to buy a better PC for better client performance or a faster ISP for minimum lag. The slippery slope works both ways.
Mechael wrote:But they do have an effect. No part of the game is completely separate from the rest of the game. It all adds up to define what EVE is.
So what IS the affect of clothing items in the Nex store on EVE? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 30 .. 31 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |