Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Atticus Fynch
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 13:58:00 -
[1]
How Americans see Europe
How Europe sees America.
That concludes our lesson.
|

Marko Riva
Adamant Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 14:08:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Marko Riva on 04/09/2010 14:08:33 Second one is definitely off, I don't think the average Euro sees all the states independently. They might class them as such
- California : movies, arnie - Nevada: las vegas, here you lose your money - Florida: drugs, old folks - NYC: NYC (what, it's in a state?)
rest of the USA is dumb****, redneck, 250KG McDonalds ****s.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 20:23:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Marko Riva Edited by: Marko Riva on 04/09/2010 14:08:33 Second one is definitely off, I don't think the average Euro sees all the states independently. They might class them as such
- California : movies, arnie - Nevada: las vegas, here you lose your money - Florida: drugs, old folks - NYC: NYC (what, it's in a state?)
rest of the USA is dumb****, redneck, 250KG McDonalds ****s.
Proof that there is such as thing as a eurotrash douchebag right here. :)
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 20:26:00 -
[4]
Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
|

Flap jak
Fleetworks The Spire Collective
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 21:49:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
proud of it!  __
|

Slate Shoa
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 22:12:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
Being an American, I see Europe as the conceited neighbor that views Americans as all "dumb****, redneck, 250KG McDonalds ****s"... 
|

ceaon
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 22:25:00 -
[7]
the image how EU see USA is wrong there are way to many stuff for each state there are 51 of them i have a hard time to know about the all EU country's and you expect to know stuff about other 51 states on another continent
Originally by: CCP Adida The male thread was locked because the discussion turned into transsexuals and man boobs.
|

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 22:29:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Vogue on 04/09/2010 22:30:49 This is another armchair sport. Frankly put the world is still in the thrall of western christians. But the seams are unravelling. Having thought the west defeated communism in the cold war the USA now finds itself in the position that China is its banker. The right in USA has decided to stigmatise muslims as sharp toothed blood drinking pirates. Well that is stupid and 1 billion muslims on this planet are not going to vanish down a rabbit hole.
Europe will muddle on. But for USA to muddle on is not enough to retain its no#1 status. It's loosing its edge. A cultural war between the left and right in the USA is not helping. And a moronic idealogy in the USA of exporting one size of democracy fits all.
..................................................
|

Verrenici
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 02:26:00 -
[9]
http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8676/europeseesamerica.png
I fixed your picture.
You're welcome.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 02:29:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Vogue Edited by: Vogue on 04/09/2010 22:30:49The right in USA has decided to stigmatise muslims as sharp toothed blood drinking pirates. Well that is stupid and 1 billion muslims on this planet are not going to vanish down a rabbit hole.
Do you live in Europe? Are you actually saying that the US is the only country in the world to stigmatize Muslims? There's plenty of that going around here in Europe as well. They're no more stigmatized in the US than in Europe.
|
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 02:47:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:52:54 Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:47:49 Also, some of the American stereotypes towards Europe aren't that far off.
Germany: Beer, bad pron, Naz!s, crappy food...what's the problem here? Sure there's good food there but it's not exactly known for it.
Austria: Little Germany, lots of mountains, classical music. And? Again, where's the exaggeration? Austria's gorgeous but it's also boring as ****.
Italy: Mafia, ancient Rome, pasta, Super Mario. And? I live here and aside from the cultural history and natural beauty, that's about it. Italy has no meritocracy, they can't run ****, and in the south people REALLY DO speak like Mario.
England: Fish and chips, bad teeth, unable to serve food that complements taste buds, James Bond, The Beatles, Harry Potter, The Queen, etc. Is it that far off?
Ireland: Red hair, U2, alcoholics, and potatoes. Yep, that's about it. Also the occasional bomb.
Norway: Vikings turned fishermen, also black metal. Yep. I'd kill to live there, though.
France: Snobby people, great wine, Paris is filthy. Can anyone argue with this?
Holland: Drugs, hookers, and drugged-out hookers. Check.
Greece: gyros and a broke country. Not so fair, though...gorgeous islands and ruins as well. Women too.
Czech Rep: Beer, cheap hookers, more beer. Yep. Czech beer is fantastic.
The point of all of this is that what we're all known for isn't so far from the truth. Stereotypes exist for a reason, partly due to ignorance and the other part due to reality. Being American, it also works for us too. Pretty much everything from NC to Texas is a big swath of rednecks and Tea Partiers. Also, Europeans don't give a **** about any state besides California, Nevada, New York, and maybe Washington state, but that's just because of the music scene and tweens who love Twilight. Honestly, I wouldn't either. I mean, Ohio? Seriously?
|

Cikulisuy
Amarr D00M. Northern Coalition.
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 04:36:00 -
[12]
there are no countries, only people. this nationalist caricaturing is funny when not serious, but the terrible thing is people still do this seriously. oh well. euros are nanny-state pansies with no sense of whats really important. also soccer. not football. ~ |

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 05:32:00 -
[13]
I see europe as about the same as I see the other states of the union. They are all populated by people with funny accents that have a culture I can't relate to. 
Originally by: CCP Oveur My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard.
Originally by: Ryhss There is no paranoia in Eve, everyone is out to get you....
|

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Fyretracker Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 06:29:00 -
[14]
And the sad thing is the reflective ways we see each other can all be traced to our Media and our Idiot governments.
Though I have heard the french can be a bit Snooty even off the world of fake that is TV and Movie.
And sorry world, the US does not have any cops that run around office buildings and handle terrorists the correct way. But Die Hard was still a fun ride and is one of the best Christmas films out there.
|

Grimpak
Gallente The Whitehound Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 07:21:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Cikulisuy there are no countries, only people. this nationalist caricaturing is funny when not serious, but the terrible thing is people still do this seriously. oh well. euros are nanny-state pansies with no sense of whats really important. also soccer. not football.
no, football, because we play the ball with the feet.
you guys play this egg thing with the hands and rarely use your foot to kick it.
but what am I talking anyways. I'm portuguese, and apparently I'm spanish. ---
Quote: The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.
ain't that right. |

TimMc
Brutal Deliverance
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 09:31:00 -
[16]
As a British-American hybrid, I enjoy trolling both sides in these debates.
In the end though, I think I prefer being British because I've spent my adult life here. America feels huge - food, people, cars, roads, distances, cities, everything. Europeans see this as a facet of American arrogance, but really America has been on top of the world for a while now so is allowed to have a self inflated opinion of itself. While Europe was repairing from WW2s devastation, America had benefited from the improved industry and flood of skilled immigrants. Soon though America will need to change as China or India take their place as superpowers.
|

Sazkyen
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 09:52:00 -
[17]
What comes to mind when thinking about the US:
- JFK - Clinton's affair - Moon landing - McDonalds (sorry, but it comes naturally) - Cold War - Area 51 - Guantanamo prison - Fort Knox - pool-side **** scenes - huge travel distances - Bobby Fisher
ofc it's just my mindset 
-SIG- Ship comparison |

Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 11:25:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 05/09/2010 08:43:30
Originally by: Cikulisuy there are no countries, only people. this nationalist caricaturing is funny when not serious, but the terrible thing is people still do this seriously. oh well. euros are nanny-state pansies with no sense of whats really important. also soccer. not football.
no, football, because we play the ball with the feet.
you guys play this egg thing with the hands and rarely use your foot to kick it.
but what am I talking about anyways. I'm portuguese, and apparently I'm spanish.
It's a damn good kick when it happens  Signature locked for editing a moderator's warning. Zymurgist |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 11:43:00 -
[19]
Originally by: TimMc As a British-American hybrid, I enjoy trolling both sides in these debates.
In the end though, I think I prefer being British because I've spent my adult life here. America feels huge - food, people, cars, roads, distances, cities, everything. Europeans see this as a facet of American arrogance, but really America has been on top of the world for a while now so is allowed to have a self inflated opinion of itself. While Europe was repairing from WW2s devastation, America had benefited from the improved industry and flood of skilled immigrants. Soon though America will need to change as China or India take their place as superpowers.
I live in Europe as well and I prefer this place to the US. The US was a great place to live years ago, but no more. The only way I'd return to the US to live would be if I were offered a job with at least a 6-figure salary. The US is the place you want to go if you want to be a lawyer, a doctor, or a banker.
If you simply want to enjoy life without having to worry about money, Europe is the place you want to be. However, you can't have both. Europeans want the salaries of Americans but they also want their 30 days per year paid vacation and guaranteed job contracts; you can't have your cake and eat it too. Conversely, Americans want to keep their high salaries but don't want to pay for a functioning health care system. Again, you can't have both.
In short, if you're ambitious, move to the US. If you don't care and you just want to live your life, stay in Europe.
|

So Sensational
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 12:52:00 -
[20]
Yeah the "Europe sees America" pic is way off, even though we normally have the "OMG americanye r fat n dumb" type of attitude we know way less than that picture shows. Maybe 1/4th of the states, at the most.
|
|

Corozan Aspinall
Party Time Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 13:44:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Atticus Fynch How Americans see Europe
Never mind Americans, that's pretty much how Europeans view (its view btw, not see) Europe.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 14:01:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Corozan Aspinall
Originally by: Atticus Fynch How Americans see Europe
Never mind Americans, that's pretty much how Europeans view (its view btw, not see) Europe.
Haha so true! Europeans are a self-loathing bunch...it's just that they loathe everyone else as well, which is something Americans can't understand. Americans want to be liked by everyone and they get ****ed when they're not.
|

dr doooo
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 15:02:00 -
[23]
The one that bugs me is American's belief that the British have bad teeth. Americans have significantly higher levels of tooth decay than the British. Maybe they should spend a bit less on cosmetics (getting unfeasibly straight radioactively white teeth that end up looking like cheap dentures), and a bit more on dental healthcare. It's Americans who have abnormally bad teeth compared to the rest of the world 
|

TimMc
Brutal Deliverance IMPERIAL LEGI0N
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 20:07:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Astenion I live in Europe as well and I prefer this place to the US. The US was a great place to live years ago, but no more. The only way I'd return to the US to live would be if I were offered a job with at least a 6-figure salary. The US is the place you want to go if you want to be a lawyer, a doctor, or a banker.
If you simply want to enjoy life without having to worry about money, Europe is the place you want to be. However, you can't have both. Europeans want the salaries of Americans but they also want their 30 days per year paid vacation and guaranteed job contracts; you can't have your cake and eat it too. Conversely, Americans want to keep their high salaries but don't want to pay for a functioning health care system. Again, you can't have both.
In short, if you're ambitious, move to the US. If you don't care and you just want to live your life, stay in Europe.
I would agree with that. If I wanted the expansive beauty of America, I think I would live in Canada for the socialism. I would only work in the US if I had good family healthcare included in my pay package.
Originally by: dr doooo
The one that bugs me is American's belief that the British have bad teeth. Americans have significantly higher levels of tooth decay than the British. Maybe they should spend a bit less on cosmetics (getting unfeasibly straight radioactively white teeth that end up looking like cheap dentures), and a bit more on dental healthcare. It's Americans who have abnormally bad teeth compared to the rest of the world 
The stereotype apparently arose a hundred years ago when the british would stain their teeth to show they were rich enough to afford sugar. It sticks around, despite British having some of the best dental hygiene in the world.
|

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Fyretracker Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 21:05:00 -
[25]
Well brits dont have to worry if their job covers dental like we here in the US have our health care bound to corporate overlords. and sadly without torches and pitchforks I do not think we can change anything.
|

whiteshark12
The Black Rabbits Academy The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 21:40:00 -
[26]
Originally by: So Sensational Yeah the "Europe sees America" pic is way off, even though we normally have the "OMG americanye r fat n dumb" type of attitude we know way less than that picture shows. Maybe 1/4th of the states, at the most.
agreed. i view america as a country, not by the states.
|

TimMc
Brutal Deliverance IMPERIAL LEGI0N
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 23:26:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Viktor Fyretracker Well brits dont have to worry if their job covers dental like we here in the US have our health care bound to corporate overlords. and sadly without torches and pitchforks I do not think we can change anything.
Our socialised medicine only covers dental up to age of 18, and same for optometry (glasses). Would be nice if they were completely free for everyone, but dental gets quite expensive and is not needed usually.
|

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 23:41:00 -
[28]
I got dental treatment in the UK when I was 21 as I agreed to go to a dental school. The trainee dentists did a lot of assement but a qualified dentist actually did the work.
If your over 18 in the UK and need dental work query your local dental school\hospital. They most likely are only in major cities.
..................................................
|

Alec Freeman
Minmatar Adventurers Matari Visionary Coalition
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 00:32:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Astenion
Originally by: Corozan Aspinall
Originally by: Atticus Fynch How Americans see Europe
Never mind Americans, that's pretty much how Europeans view (its view btw, not see) Europe.
Haha so true! Europeans are a self-loathing bunch...it's just that they loathe everyone else as well, which is something Americans can't understand. Americans want to be liked by everyone and they get ****ed when they're not.
Err... I think youll find Europeans arnt really a self loathing bunch because Europe is a CONTINENT made up of COUNTRYS which contain there own STATES/REGIONS, whereas USA (often refered to here as just America) is a COUNTRY made up of STATES. So lets say me being from Scotland think England is a bunch of stuck up pricks doesnt make me self loathing as its a completly different country im thinking of.
+ lolololol americans are fat n' stoopid 
|

Atticus Fynch
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 01:11:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Alec Freeman
Originally by: Astenion
Originally by: Corozan Aspinall
Originally by: Atticus Fynch How Americans see Europe
Never mind Americans, that's pretty much how Europeans view (its view btw, not see) Europe.
Haha so true! Europeans are a self-loathing bunch...it's just that they loathe everyone else as well, which is something Americans can't understand. Americans want to be liked by everyone and they get ****ed when they're not.
Err... I think youll find Europeans arnt really a self loathing bunch because Europe is a CONTINENT made up of COUNTRYS which contain there own STATES/REGIONS, whereas USA (often refered to here as just America) is a COUNTRY made up of STATES. So lets say me being from Scotland think England is a bunch of stuck up pricks doesnt make me self loathing as its a completly different country im thinking of.
+ lolololol americans are fat n' stoopid 
We are not stoopet , we all know Europe is a country.
[Why the US is a world power, I dont know.]
|
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 04:31:00 -
[31]
How europeans see the US is not so much on a state level, it's the coasts and the inland.
East coast, old money and old stuff in general, Florida being gators and geezers.
West coast, hippies, pot and posers, gangs come from here.
Inland, parades, church on sunday, groundhog 50s. A 'you point, we war!' mindset.
I didn't know Salem was on the west coast, pioneering backwards striving people, how very interesting.
Delenda est achura. |

Fumitsugu
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 07:02:00 -
[32]
So I saw on TV that there are vampires in the Deep South. Is this true?
I think that most Europeans don't spare much thought for America as a country (unless you pay attention to the ridiculous level of coverage that BBC puts out. Sarah Palin's daughter splitting up with her fiance: front page news? Apparently.) but US foreign policy is often perceived as sledgehammer and arrogant, which is a little strange because all the Americans I've met have been fairly nice and down to earth people.
Interestingly the most off-putting people I've met all seem to come from Brazil, despite their touchy-feely foreign policy.
|

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 10:19:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Vogue on 06/09/2010 10:26:47 Most Americans are not interested in foreign policy whereas its elite is deeply so to continue it's global hegemoney.
As it happened to the British empire if you top dog in the world you are going to get a lot of emotions aginst that. Jealously, bitterness, annoyance at being clumsy. If USA did retrench then the EU would have to step up to the plate. Then the Euro's would have to increase milatery spending at the expense of welfare spending.
Problem USA has it that it is the first global power that does not do colonalism with foreign territory. But it does it economically. So it has a poor record in nation building. After the conquest of Iraq Donald Rumsfeld was given a 900 page report by the state department on how to rebuild Iraq. He just put that in the bin.
..................................................
|

Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 15:16:00 -
[34]
They forgot Ireland's border.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|

Borza Slavak
Minmatar Mirkur Draug'Tyr Damu'Khonde
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 15:36:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Astenion
The point of all of this is that what we're all known for isn't so far from the truth.
Almost all of it is miles off. Ignoramus!
|

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Fyretracker Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 16:08:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Wendat Huron
I didn't know Salem was on the west coast, pioneering backwards striving people, how very interesting.
Salem is not in the West, I am sure they have a few towns called that but the famous one is Salem, MA here on the East Coast.
For how "young" the US is it is claimed that New England is one of the most haunted places on earth by those who do the ghost hunting thing.
|

Rocktown
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 16:42:00 -
[37]
I believe the salem you were looking for is in mass, unless I'm missing something. However the "hate witches" thing makes me think it was alluding to the witch trials.
|

Reiisha
Evolution IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 17:03:00 -
[38]
How Europeans view the US:
NYC: Gets blown up all the time Alabama: Human/vegetable population on the rise Texas: Shooting while driving drunk is allowed? California: Governator. The rest: Rednecks/hippies.
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|

Ak'athra J'ador
Amarr Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2010.09.06 22:59:00 -
[39]
wow whoever made that remembered to put Slovenia on...
didn't know people knew we existed 
|

de v
|
Posted - 2010.09.07 01:55:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Rodj Blake They forgot Ireland's border.
Meh, how it should be! 
|
|

Barakkus
Caelestis Iudicium
|
Posted - 2010.09.07 22:18:00 -
[41]
I always figured this is a pretty accurate summation of how people in the US view the rest of the world. Take it to any Walmart or Target store and I bet 99% of the people there will agree with it.
Originally by: CCP Dropbear
rofl
edit: ah crap, dev account. Oh well, official rofl at you sir.
|

Slade Trillgon
Endless Possibilities Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.07 22:59:00 -
[42]
Every country has their fair share of idiots like this. Unfortunately this is an example from my country 
Slade
:Signature Temporarily Disabled: |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 00:21:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Borza Slavak
Originally by: Astenion
The point of all of this is that what we're all known for isn't so far from the truth.
Almost all of it is miles off. Ignoramus!
Really? MILES off? It's exaggerated, sure, but there is a little truth in it. Stereotypes wouldn't exist without a small amount of truth. Are you telling me that England is known for its cuisine, that Italy is known for its outstanding organization, and that the French are known to be a warm, sunny people? No, you're not. Just because you're a hypersensitive **** about it doesn't change the fact that SOME STEREOTYPES ARE TRUE. That doesn't mean you can broadbrush an entire people, however.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 00:32:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Reiisha How Europeans view the US:
NYC: Gets blown up all the time Alabama: Human/vegetable population on the rise Texas: Shooting while driving drunk is allowed? California: Governator. The rest: Rednecks/hippies.
After pondering this, I really can't explain it in a better way.
|

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 11:13:00 -
[45]
1) Yes. Stereotypes exist for a reason and generalizations are fine. What isn't fine is specifying from a generalization or generalizing from a specific. I.E. - You can say that dogs tend to have fur coats. Saying that because dogs tend to have 4 legs that all dogs have 4 legs is inaccurate as some of them have lost a leg or two. Saying that because a Collie has a long coat - that all dogs have long coats - is inaccurate.
2) Most cultures like to see themselves as being superior to other cultures - when they are merely different. That isn't to say that there aren't truly reprehensible aspects to certain cultures - merely that what is reprehensible can be more a matter of what you're accustomed to than an absolute.
3) By definition, 50% of humanity is below average intelligence. This is true regardless of borders. You have stupid people everywhere.
4) At various points in time, various countries were the Microsoft of the World. They were each hated in turn by those who wanted their country to be the Microsoft and resented the hell out of the fact that they weren't.
5) The United States of America - Saved Europe during WWI. The United States of America - Saved Europe during WWII. The United States of America - saved Europe from WWIII. No good deed goes unpunished.
6) Yes. The Chinese will probably be running things in 50 years. See how you like that.
7) If the USA retrenches - Europe will not pick up the slack. The Europeans feel that they have done their bit - and - the rest of the world can just go to hell. Right now ... the USA feels that with great power - comes great responsibility (yes - that is from Spiderman) and is sending it's sons and daughters off to foreign lands to try to keep things from going to hell. When we get tired of doing that too - we'll just see if the Chinese pick up the slack (a hint: they won't) or if the rest of the world just goes to hell in a hand basket (hint: it will). So - if you live in a third world country - just stand by for the world around you to turn to ****. Death and destruction will run rampant - the Four Horsemen will be set free - and the fat, lazy, arrogant industrialized nations of the world will sit on their asses watching the poor little 3rd Worlders die on TV and think ... "Someone should do some thing about that ... Oops - my show is on!"
8) 'Cause - you see - the USA & Europe (and the rest of the industrialized nations of the world) have a lot more in common than they like to think. We are all fat, lazy rich people by world standards. None of us has anything in common but the basic functionality of our bodies - with most of the people who live on this planet - and - when their lives are all going right down the ****ter in the not so distant future - and none of us do a damn thing to help them - they'll hate frakking all of us.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Fumitsugu
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 11:42:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
5) The United States of America - joined the war in 1917 and didn't really contribute much, save for the indirect threat of an unwinnable war for Imperial Germany.
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
The United States of America - got Europe into WWIII.
Corrected.
|

Zarflax Zeeblebrox
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 12:11:00 -
[47]
Excellent troll OP. 20/1. |

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 13:43:00 -
[48]
What Toshiro said about a vac****of power if USA withdraws has a lot of truth. USA does operate, as any superpower world with divide and rule. But if they actually did pull back it could be a case of better the devil you know for western interests.
The quickest effect of US retrenchment would be the proliferation of nuclear weapons in many lesser states.
And with USA's strategic economic model based around high milatery spending it pays a social price with higher crime and poverty for those at the bottom of the pile. Although the percentage of taxation to GDP has crept up a fair bit recently.
..................................................
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:06:00 -
[49]
Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:13:41 Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:12:34 Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:06:52
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
5) The United States of America - joined the war in 1917 and didn't really contribute much, save for the indirect threat of an unwinnable war for Imperial Germany.
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
The United States of America - got Europe into WWIII.
Corrected.
Here's a clue: WW2 was a world war, not a European war. You DO know that there was more than one front, right? That we toppled both the German AND Japanese militaries, right? We were attacked by Japan, so we retaliated while Europeans were still sitting around eating olives and complaining that someone should do something about the Germans. You seem to forget that we were fighting wars in two different hemispheres. Do you really think that you could've beaten the Germans without American help, and if so, would you have preferred the Russians in the aftermath? If so, you're simply delusional. Please forgive us for not coming to your rescue soon enough and saving what was left of your continent from both fascism and communism...send us the bill.
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:14:00 -
[50]
The British are a cultured people with an international outlook on life, we understand that America is just one part of the world.
The funny thing about generalizations is how they are true and false at the same time. While in the states I did meet a lot of fat yanks and rednecks but the stereotypes start falling apart when you talk to individuals.
Intelligent red necks, hippies who don't smoke pot and humvee driving socialists are among the oddities of the American population. Long may these oddities continue  _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:19:00 -
[51]
Originally by: yani dumyat The British are a cultured people with an international outlook on life, we understand that America is just one part of the world.
The funny thing about generalizations is how they are true and false at the same time. While in the states I did meet a lot of fat yanks and rednecks but the stereotypes start falling apart when you talk to individuals.
Intelligent red necks, hippies who don't smoke pot and humvee driving socialists are among the oddities of the American population. Long may these oddities continue 
This is very true. In the US there are no labels or cultures in which to follow...be anything you want. The longer I live in Europe the more everyone seems so compartmentalized.
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:22:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Astenion
Please forgive us for not coming to your rescue soon enough and saving what was left of your continent from both fascism and communism...send us the bill.
Apology accepted on the understanding that you won't be so late in future :)
BTW You did send us the bill and as far as I know we're still repaying it. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:23:00 -
[53]
I watched a tv program years ago that talked to American rednecks. One of them simply said 'education is good n'all but I need to know how to skin a chicken and cook it more than learning physics'.
I think the morale of that is there is much to be said for living of the land. Urban people are more wanting, fickle and spoilt.
I think someone who lives in a big city will have more common perspectives with someone else from another country in a big city than someone who lives off the land in their own country.
Imo progress is three steps forward and one step back. We mostly gain but we also loose something for the sake of progress.
..................................................
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:27:00 -
[54]
Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:28:17
Originally by: yani dumyat
Originally by: Astenion
Please forgive us for not coming to your rescue soon enough and saving what was left of your continent from both fascism and communism...send us the bill.
Apology accepted on the understanding that you won't be so late in future :)
BTW You did send us the bill and as far as I know we're still repaying it.
We'll be sure to call in beforehand in case we're stuck in traffic. 
I'd really love to see our pseudo-empire retract most of its forces around the globe and have the US go back into a sort of hibernation state. I understand the need for forward deployment of forces but this is 2010 and Europe is no longer the continent it was; in many ways it has surpassed the US in just about every facet except for economic might...however, the EU isn't so far behind.
It's a shame that the only Americans Europeans see are fat tourists and military bases...not that there's a whole helluva lot in the US to see, .
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 15:30:00 -
[55]
Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:30:40
Originally by: Vogue I watched a tv program years ago that talked to American rednecks. One of them simply said 'education is good n'all but I need to know how to skin a chicken and cook it more than learning physics'.
I think the morale of that is there is much to be said for living of the land. Urban people are more wanting, fickle and spoilt.
I think someone who lives in a big city will have more common perspectives with someone else from another country in a big city than someone who lives off the land in their own country.
Imo progress is three steps forward and one step back. We mostly gain but we also loose something for the sake of progress.
Vogue, you always seem to hit the nail on the head with your posts. Bravo!
Education, or lack of it rather, is truly going to be the downfall of the US.
|

Fumitsugu
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 19:46:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:13:41 Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:12:34 Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:06:52
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
5) The United States of America - joined the war in 1917 and didn't really contribute much, save for the indirect threat of an unwinnable war for Imperial Germany.
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
The United States of America - got Europe into WWIII.
Corrected.
That we toppled both the German AND Japanese militaries, right? We were attacked by Japan, so we retaliated while Europeans were still sitting around eating olives and complaining that someone should do something about the Germans.
You see, I wasn't being serious. But you undermined the validity of your argument with the above statements. We're more or less on the same page, Astenion. I just dislike the word "save" when discussing history. It's a bit too Lord of the Ringsy
|

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 20:34:00 -
[57]
What the hell is with all these Misguided Americans who thought they won WW1? Seriously read the history books it was the British blockade which broke imperial Germany by literally starving them out. And WW2 Dont get me started, Americans think they were the only ones fighting the Japanese, the British had fleets in the pacfic we were fighting campaigns to defend our colonial assets, Hell no American knew the terror of being attacked on home terriatory on a daily basis (Pearl harbour does not compare to the continual Air raids over britain) Russia paid in blood their contribution to defeating Germany with the highest casualties of any country involved, they were the ones who captured Berlin, And no sooner did you realise them as a threat you turned potential allies into enemies by alienating them. You speak of preventing the world from descending into chaos? its all perspective, sitting here in Britain i fail to see how invading Iraq benefitted anyone, secondly its none of your business to enforce your view of democracy on the world, if the people of countries do not rise up to remove dictators themselves then they do not deserve freedom. And lets be blunt, when Britain was all Empiring the **** out of the rest of the world, we atleast had the decency to lie and say we were civilising the locals, all you do is invade random nations for no reason, **** on UN mandates and drag your allies into stupid proxy wars over resources which actually increase the cost of oil instead of reducing it.
TL;DR: the USA will one day start WW3 with its insatiable thirst of other peoples resources and enforcing its views on the world, i for one hope this ends in utter humiliation for this Imperialistic and hegemonic 'Superpower'
/endrant
|

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 20:39:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
by colonial efforts you mean massacre all natives and enslave everyone else?
...wait, you thought that was our idea? ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 20:40:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
by colonial efforts you mean massacre all natives and enslave everyone else?
...wait, you thought that was our idea?
No we just send the Irish in to outbreed the locals.
|

Thuranni
The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 21:19:00 -
[60]
I don't think the average European is going to even know or care about the characteristics of each the American states. Speaking as a European, the US is broadly categorized into "The East Coast", "The West Coast", and "The South", mostly because I'm completely ignorant of any of the finer details.
|
|

Umega
Solis Mensa
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 21:21:00 -
[61]
Why does WWII have to be brought into this and who won it? If the Axis started out flanking Russia, that'd have been screwed. If they flanked the States first, US woulda been screwed. But.. their own personal egotistical views and ideas got in the way and Japan went with a southern asia fan approach and germany/italy went 360. Which lead to their defeat when ALL nations worked together to beat them down. Would Russia have faired as well towards the end if the States didn't dump several hundred thousand troops on Germany's western flank to deal with? And vice versa? Same for the Japanese front. It.. was.. a.. WORLD war. The end result was the cold war which was actually a good thing. Simply look at graphs and the decline in the amount of worldwide deaths from warfare since 1945 on compared to before. But there is the bad result.. besides East/West Germany mess, there was Israel, Egypt, yada-yada and what we have now because of what was created at that moment in history (thank you brits, altho I understand it was under good intentions and no one had a clue what would come of it).
As for the original point of the topic. Both sides do the same ****. You say this, we say that.. all based upon stereotypes, our politic views, and how the media feeds us and what we CHOOSE to take in. Both sides are guilty of making assumptions, most of the time simply to make a point cause they feel their view point is important enough to warrent a response. Really.. both sides are just selfishly promoting their own ideas because they are smarter and more 'clued' in, and thus their view is right.. **** everyone else. Whooopity..
Good ole Pride. I have pride for my country, and I respect anyone else that does for their own as well. Pride. Good ole Pride's self replicating arrogance of 'right n wrong'. Is what it is, and we're all just branches growing off the same tree.
---------------------------------------- -Treat the EVE Market like you're a pimp and it is your 'employee'.. freely fondle it as you wish and make it pay you for it- |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 21:57:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Charles Baker
No we just send the Irish in to outbreed the locals.
Surely you mean create mass resentment in Scotland, Ireland and Wales by starving and evicting the gaelic communities then throwing them on ships and hoping for the best? Saor Alba.
An unforeseen consequence of this is that whiskey became one of the more destructive tools of colonization, particularly among native americans. With the natives out the way it was the Spanish we had to out breed, only time will tell on that one.
That may sound like a harsh way of looking at America but people thought about the world differently in those days.
Both Europe and America have grown up a lot since the "founding fathers" (A hideous phrase in itself) created the United States but we still act like teenagers, no UK school history text will tell us how many people died in British concentration camps and Henry the 8th is remembered for chopping off heads rather than systematically starving those damn northerners.
We are still growing up and as such we are afraid of ourselves, I will know that the UK and America have passed puberty when the rich and ancient history of our native cultures is taught in schools and every child leaves school with a basic understanding of the relationship between war and commodity prices.
Hmm, that turned in to a rant. On a lighter note rednecks were probably an unforeseen consequence of colonization. Fortunately we kept the talented ones for ourselves ^_^ _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 22:01:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Umega stuff
10/10 Good rant :) _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 22:24:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Umega rant
Just treat these kids as the same idiots who really believe that all other politicians/parties/systems are corrupt and evil, and only the one they support is "good". ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 22:31:00 -
[65]
Ireland was awesome, I'm going to Rome for a week in October. Europeans seem nice enough, definitely more polite than my fellow Americans. Europe is what America should be socially, America is what Europe should be militarily. 
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 22:56:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Zedic Ireland was awesome, I'm going to Rome for a week in October. Europeans seem nice enough, definitely more polite than my fellow Americans. Europe is what America should be socially, America is what Europe should be militarily. 
/This
We can end this thread now.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 22:58:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:13:41 Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:12:34 Edited by: Astenion on 08/09/2010 15:06:52
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
5) The United States of America - joined the war in 1917 and didn't really contribute much, save for the indirect threat of an unwinnable war for Imperial Germany.
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
The United States of America - got Europe into WWIII.
Corrected.
That we toppled both the German AND Japanese militaries, right? We were attacked by Japan, so we retaliated while Europeans were still sitting around eating olives and complaining that someone should do something about the Germans.
You see, I wasn't being serious. But you undermined the validity of your argument with the above statements. We're more or less on the same page, Astenion. I just dislike the word "save" when discussing history. It's a bit too Lord of the Ringsy
One does not simply joke in OOE! 
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:05:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Thuranni I don't think the average European is going to even know or care about the characteristics of each the American states. Speaking as a European, the US is broadly categorized into "The East Coast", "The West Coast", and "The South", mostly because I'm completely ignorant of any of the finer details.
No no, don't worry; you're not ignorant of anything. That pretty much summed up the US. 
There's a big canyon, some nice mountains, lots of tall buildings spread apart by hundreds of miles, a few nice beaches, and too many people who have no clue about anything but what's in their own back yard. That's about it. The "culture" is merely pop culture.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:10:00 -
[69]
Don't leave out the Midwest home of Chicago aka Caprica City. 
Chicago is a shining beacon of beauty, tolerance, improvement, and near total corruption. It is *the* ivory tower to which I will confine myself, should the nutbag "conservatives" resume power. And if they do, you might as well nuke us dear Europeans.
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:12:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Zedic Don't leave out the Midwest home of Chicago aka Caprica City. 
Chicago is a shining beacon of beauty, tolerance, improvement, and near total corruption. It is *the* ivory tower to which I will confine myself, should the nutbag "conservatives" resume power. And if they do, you might as well nuke us dear Europeans.
Hope you have plenty of mace  ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:15:00 -
[71]
The fact is, unless you live in some dirt poor third world country, the US isn't a step up from other places; in most instances it's a step down. The education system is in the ****ter, crime is rampant, and the quality of life has seriously gone downhill.
The only thing in my opinion that would have any draw for Europeans to live in the US would be higher salaries and more convenience. Seriously. When I think about the things I miss about the US, it's either pay or 7-11. That's it.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:19:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: Zedic Don't leave out the Midwest home of Chicago aka Caprica City. 
Chicago is a shining beacon of beauty, tolerance, improvement, and near total corruption. It is *the* ivory tower to which I will confine myself, should the nutbag "conservatives" resume power. And if they do, you might as well nuke us dear Europeans.
Hope you have plenty of mace 
I've no need of mace. There are few teaparty / republican't douches running around Chicago to really cause much trouble..
LOL...
Living in the city (downtown) is not bad by any means. The worse areas for crime are the west side suburbs and south side. Everyone knows this.
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:22:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Zedic
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: Zedic Don't leave out the Midwest home of Chicago aka Caprica City. 
Chicago is a shining beacon of beauty, tolerance, improvement, and near total corruption. It is *the* ivory tower to which I will confine myself, should the nutbag "conservatives" resume power. And if they do, you might as well nuke us dear Europeans.
Hope you have plenty of mace 
I've no need of mace. There are few teaparty / republican't douches running around Chicago to really cause much trouble..
LOL...
Living in the city (downtown) is not bad by any means. The worse areas for crime are the west side suburbs and south side. Everyone knows this.
It's probably because you look like you could eat someone's face, no matter how nice of a person you are! I definitely wouldn't want to get on yer bad side!
|

Lia'Vael
Caldari Migrant Fleet
|
Posted - 2010.09.08 23:33:00 -
[74]
Theres something a bit wrong with your view of Wisconsin, we're not strange you're the strange one.
We have the best bar food of anywheres.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 00:07:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Astenion It's probably because you look like you could eat someone's face, no matter how nice of a person you are! I definitely wouldn't want to get on yer bad side!
aw shucks... 
I'm a teddy bear. mostly. 
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

vulnevia
The Exploited. Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 00:20:00 -
[76]
Americans are all pork and fat :D Hey I saw it on Dirty Jobs; you fried pork fat in pork fat. |

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 00:22:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
Being American, I think Britain needs another good ass kicking to show them who's boss. ;P _
Ohh hai, I saw you like to kill people, so I brought starcakes. |

vulnevia
The Exploited. Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 00:27:00 -
[78]
Originally by: RiskyFrisky
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
Being American, I think Britain needs another good ass kicking to show them who's boss. ;P
Do you even know who's you boss? :D |

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 00:31:00 -
[79]
Originally by: vulnevia
Originally by: RiskyFrisky
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
Being American, I think Britain needs another good ass kicking to show them who's boss. ;P
Do you even know who's you boss? :D
Obama. Ohh God, you're right D: _
Starcakes are the answer to life. |

vulnevia
The Exploited. Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 00:37:00 -
[80]
Originally by: RiskyFrisky
Obama. Ohh God, you're right D:
Obama is a hot whitey :D |
|

Hoban Gallifrey
New Eden University
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 02:30:00 -
[81]
After seeing some of the crazy stuff coming from the US lately. Qur'an burning, fox news, community center fire bombing, the tea party, creationism in schools and many other things. I hereby invite the UN to move to London where you might be a bit safer from the madness.
Some of you guys really didn't learn anything did you?
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 03:06:00 -
[82]
New Mexico should say; 'Here be jesushorses!'
Delenda est achura. |

Horace Lankenveil
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 09:03:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Hoban Gallifrey After seeing some of the crazy stuff coming from the US lately. Qur'an burning, fox news, community center fire bombing, the tea party, creationism in schools and many other things. I hereby invite the UN to move to London where you might be a bit safer from the madness.
Some of you guys really didn't learn anything did you?
Most people in the world base their views on other cultures and countries based on what the media shows them, and unfortunately, the people that get the most air-time under the world media spotlight in America are crazy. Most Americans, like myself, don't give a crap about the Tea Party Movement, what other religions do, or having solid proof that our president was born in the United States. Most of us just go about our lives trying to make a living and trying not to be jerks to one another (just like the majority of everyone else in the world).
|

So Sensational
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 11:40:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
Corrected.
Lend-Lease.
|

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 13:02:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Horace Lankenveil
Originally by: Hoban Gallifrey After seeing some of the crazy stuff coming from the US lately. Qur'an burning, fox news, community center fire bombing, the tea party, creationism in schools and many other things. I hereby invite the UN to move to London where you might be a bit safer from the madness.
Some of you guys really didn't learn anything did you?
Most people in the world base their views on other cultures and countries based on what the media shows them, and unfortunately, the people that get the most air-time under the world media spotlight in America are crazy. Most Americans, like myself, don't give a crap about the Tea Party Movement, what other religions do, or having solid proof that our president was born in the United States. Most of us just go about our lives trying to make a living and trying not to be jerks to one another (just like the majority of everyone else in the world).
You sir, just won an internets. _
Starcakes are the answer to life. |

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 13:04:00 -
[86]
Edited by: RiskyFrisky on 09/09/2010 13:05:31 Edited by: RiskyFrisky on 09/09/2010 13:04:54
Originally by: So Sensational
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
Corrected.
Lend-Lease.
Russia got to Berlin first because the U.S./Britain/Russia had an agreement to let Russia take Berlin.
Lurn ur historeeee. _
Starcakes are the answer to life. |

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 13:09:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Astenion
Originally by: Thuranni I don't think the average European is going to even know or care about the characteristics of each the American states. Speaking as a European, the US is broadly categorized into "The East Coast", "The West Coast", and "The South", mostly because I'm completely ignorant of any of the finer details.
No no, don't worry; you're not ignorant of anything. That pretty much summed up the US. 
There's a big canyon, some nice mountains, lots of tall buildings spread apart by hundreds of miles, a few nice beaches, and too many people who have no clue about anything but what's in their own back yard. That's about it. The "culture" is merely pop culture.
Don't forget about us Floridians ;~; We have Disney Land, bush Gardens and Universal Studios. //NASA *Cough* _
Starcakes are the answer to life. |

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 13:12:00 -
[88]
Edited by: Vogue on 09/09/2010 13:14:24 Wiki:-
No plans were made by the Western Allies to seize the city by a ground operation.[24] U.S. General Dwight D. Eisenhower lost his interest in the race to Berlin and saw no further need to suffer casualties in attacking a city that would be in the Soviet sphere of influence after the war General Eisenhower foresaw excessive friendly fire if both armies attempted to occupy the city at once.[26] The major Western Allied contribution to the battle was the strategic bombing of Berlin during 1945.[27] During 1945 the United States Army Air Forces launched a number of very large daytime raids on Berlin, and for 36 nights in succession scores of RAF Mosquitos bombed the German capital, ending on the night of 20/21 April 1945 just before the Soviets entered the city.[28][/i]
The battle of Berlin was a huge bloodbath. Russian casulties was 361,367 men and for the Germans 937,378 men.
..................................................
|

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Fyretracker Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 13:59:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Horace Lankenveil
Originally by: Hoban Gallifrey After seeing some of the crazy stuff coming from the US lately. Qur'an burning, fox news, community center fire bombing, the tea party, creationism in schools and many other things. I hereby invite the UN to move to London where you might be a bit safer from the madness.
Some of you guys really didn't learn anything did you?
Most people in the world base their views on other cultures and countries based on what the media shows them, and unfortunately, the people that get the most air-time under the world media spotlight in America are crazy. Most Americans, like myself, don't give a crap about the Tea Party Movement, what other religions do, or having solid proof that our president was born in the United States. Most of us just go about our lives trying to make a living and trying not to be jerks to one another (just like the majority of everyone else in the world).
That is thanks to the media only pumping out what gets ratings, which is well crazies. Take that Westboro Baptist Church for example, they are like Internet Trolls when you think about it. they are fueled by attention to go protest nearly anything their crazy little minds can imagine. In fact I'd bet half the crazies in this country and the world to be honest do what they do knowing the public will eat it up.(Tabloids in the UK and US are another example of this)
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 14:43:00 -
[90]
Edited by: Wendat Huron on 09/09/2010 14:43:43
Originally by: RiskyFrisky
Originally by: So Sensational
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
Corrected.
Lend-Lease.
Russia got to Berlin first because the U.S./Britain/Russia had an agreement to let Russia r4p3 Berlin.
Lurn ur historeeee.
Fixed the post for you.
Delenda est achura. |
|

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 16:44:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Zedic
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: Zedic Don't leave out the Midwest home of Chicago aka Caprica City. 
Chicago is a shining beacon of beauty, tolerance, improvement, and near total corruption. It is *the* ivory tower to which I will confine myself, should the nutbag "conservatives" resume power. And if they do, you might as well nuke us dear Europeans.
Hope you have plenty of mace 
I've no need of mace. There are few teaparty / republican't douches running around Chicago to really cause much trouble..
Nice try, shame its not the tea partiers that are responsible for the crime rate in chicago.
Quote: LOL...
Living in the city (downtown) is not bad by any means. The worse areas for crime are the west side suburbs and south side. Everyone knows this.
Everyone huh? What kind of people live in those areas, btw? Tea partiers and republicans? ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

So Sensational
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 17:46:00 -
[92]
Originally by: RiskyFrisky Edited by: RiskyFrisky on 09/09/2010 13:05:31 Edited by: RiskyFrisky on 09/09/2010 13:04:54
Originally by: So Sensational
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
The United States of America - was late to WWII, and what about the Russian contribution (They got to Berlin first, right?)?.
Corrected.
Lend-Lease.
Russia got to Berlin first because the U.S./Britain/Russia had an agreement to let Russia take Berlin.
Lurn ur historeeee.
Russia got to Berlin first because the Roman Empire fell, thus leading to a long chain of events that eventually led to WW2. The fall of the Roman Empire is about as much of a counter-argument as yours. u go lrn histori
So again, Lend-Lease. The US saved the world, not with military might, but industrial.
|

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 18:05:00 -
[93]
The industrial capacity of the USA was massive and it was a key to winning WW2. A Japanese admiral lamented this after they attacked pearl harbour. Also Russia's capability to churn out so many tanks in new manufacturing plants in eastern Russia was amazing.
Though a big future war will be different from WW2 as far as milatery hardware resupply goes. High tech manufacturing is very specialised. If an air force say runs out of missiles it can't get a car factory to make more as it requires special composite materials and classified electronics. Though the Pentagon has a huge bureaucracy that studies all sorts of scenarios. They may have contingencies for resupply.
..................................................
|

Vak'ran
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 18:34:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Horace Lankenveil
Most people in the world base their views on other cultures and countries based on what the media shows them
Here we go, nail @ head.
While there are some nice burst of insight here and there in this thread, something to be seen all over the internet being the nice new multipoint-injection medium it is, the majority of opinions and self appointed 'insights' in what people are like, are badly tainted by rather selective media.
Not something that happens on purpose, it is an inherent property of 'media', which is no more than a convenient system that reports on our planet in nice bitesize fragments, with or without a dash of local political interest - the scope is far too great to take in for any mere mortal anyways.
As a result humans do what humans do everywhere: over a common denominator, they really just tend to themselves and their immediate surroundings. We're simply not built for this global thinking thing (yet). In the mean time there are those who govern, through various systems, each claiming they have truth in hand and pretending more insight than everyone else, but in the end they are the same simple folk that the human race consists of.
One can only aspire to take in as much valid information as possible to make as clear a picture of the global population as they are physically capable of. Sadly, even this rather simple motivation will never be on the minds of those 'running stuff', they have other concerns.
Appreciating the scope of things versus our limited minds really makes all serious conversation in this thread rather moot.
In the mean time, to touch upon another subject raised in here, I'd like to extend my gratitude towards Canada for kicking ze Germanz off our turf in the past.
Yes, Canada 
Vak'Ran is your local official non-dedicated part-time advocate of reading comprehension and proliferation of intelligence on the EVE Online Forum |

Avyrix Sun
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 19:30:00 -
[95]
Honestly, most Americans don't care about the rest of the world (myself included, although I would love to visit Japan one day ). Especially now since most of our foreign policy consists of baby-sitting other countries. Which like or not, means Europe as well.
So you can bad mouth Uncle Sam all you want, but at least someone has the balls to step up, and be grateful that someone does.
|

Anonimous Insanity
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 20:17:00 -
[96]
Originally by: Avyrix Sun Honestly, most Americans don't care about the rest of the world (myself included, although I would love to visit Japan one day ). Especially now since most of our foreign policy consists of baby-sitting other countries. Which like or not, means Europe as well.
So you can bad mouth Uncle Sam all you want, but at least someone has the balls to step up, and be grateful that someone does.
o rly? in what way is america babysitting Europe and other well-developed countries?
http://www.minerwars.com/?aid=1456 |

RentableMuffin
|
Posted - 2010.09.09 20:53:00 -
[97]
Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 05/09/2010 08:43:30
Originally by: Cikulisuy there are no countries, only people. this nationalist caricaturing is funny when not serious, but the terrible thing is people still do this seriously. oh well. euros are nanny-state pansies with no sense of whats really important. also soccer. not football.
no, football, because we play the ball with the feet.
you guys play this egg thing with the hands and rarely use your foot to kick it.
have you seen the socks they wear, its called soccer for a reason! no idea why handegg is called football though.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 02:03:00 -
[98]
Edited by: Astenion on 10/09/2010 02:06:22 Edited by: Astenion on 10/09/2010 02:03:35
Originally by: Anonimous Insanity
Originally by: Avyrix Sun Honestly, most Americans don't care about the rest of the world (myself included, although I would love to visit Japan one day ). Especially now since most of our foreign policy consists of baby-sitting other countries. Which like or not, means Europe as well.
So you can bad mouth Uncle Sam all you want, but at least someone has the balls to step up, and be grateful that someone does.
o rly? in what way is america babysitting Europe and other well-developed countries?
Srsly. I loled
|

Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 02:08:00 -
[99]
Originally by: RentableMuffin no idea why handegg is called football though.
Too lazy to copy-pasta this damn thing, but after about 2 seconds after hitting "search" in google I found the answer  Signature locked for editing a moderator's warning. Zymurgist |

Jassie Lichous
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 02:50:00 -
[100]
Don't forget about us Floridians ;~; We have Disney Land, bush Gardens and Universal Studios. //NASA *Cough*
Being English but having spent a large part of my life in the USA (inc Hawaii and Guam! Colonies maybe?) and alot of time in Florida (Go Bucs/Lightning!) I think you will find that Disney WORLD is in Florida and Disney LAND is in California, how a local could get that wrong i dont know!! 
I think some posts in this thread shows why alot of **** taking goes on between the continents such as the guy that thought the only nation to fight the Japanese in the Pacific Theatre was the US military or the americans who think that the US foriegn policy over the last decades is purely cause 'they just wanna help out these small countries with their problems to bring freedom across the world and the rest of the world would turn to **** if they didnt step in' is simply just silly. Politians do things to benefit themselves and their country (in that order!).
What it boils down to is this : I've met nobheads in Britain and Europe and in the USA and ive also met really cool geniuine people in all those same areas. Everyone is bought up in their country to their own versions of history and pride in their country, but try to not be ignorant and see through the bull****.
In conclusion, i think the Americans do have nice teeth in general though 
|
|

Fumitsugu
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 06:31:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Jassie Lichous
I think some posts in this thread shows why alot of **** taking goes on between the continents such as[.....]the americans who think that the US foriegn policy over the last decades is purely cause 'they just wanna help out these small countries with their problems to bring freedom across the world and the rest of the world would turn to **** if they didnt step in' is simply just silly
Bull****! America's foreign policy is all to do with testicular fortitude and righteousness and absolutely nothing to do with the maintenance of the international power balance or neocolonialism. Bloody ungrateful Brits, who's paying for your queen?
|

Gistatis Tribunus
The Unknown Bar and Pub
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 07:05:00 -
[102]
The real question is Liechtenstein. They're so small that no one pays attention to them, not even this map! Who knows what nefarious activities could be going on over there? --------- "The." -Oceano da Cruz |

Daisuke Aoki
Gallente Independent Coalition OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 07:41:00 -
[103]
Speaking of America and Britain and other countries and wars, what the hell is up with Canadians thinking they "won" the war of 1812? I had a Canadian girlfriend once and she was completely seriously convinced and full of pride about the fact that (supposedly, according to her) Canada beat the US in the War of 1812.
Okay, granted, the US did attempt to invade and lose a few battles in what is now presently southeastern Canada. However, *then*, it was British North America, there was no cohesive "Canada", and you can't really say they "beat the US in the war of 1812".
Do most Canadians feel like they "won" against the US? Is this what they teach you icebacks? 
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 08:37:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Bull****! America's foreign policy is all to do with testicular fortitude and righteousness and absolutely nothing to do with the maintenance of the international power balance or neocolonialism. Bloody ungrateful Brits, who's paying for your queen?
Hey, stop pretending the US has a monopoly on mass murder and cultural destabilization as a means of acquiring natural resources. The UK's made a real f'ing mess of Nigeria in particular and Africa in general while profiting heavily from their natural resources and you can bet your last dollar that we'll leave Afghanistan with a swag bag full of minerals.
We pay for our own queen but honestly I wish it would stop. We should look to France for leadership because if nothing else they know exactly how to deal with royalty.  _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

baltec1
Antares Shipyards Circle-Of-Two
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 08:52:00 -
[105]
Originally by: yani dumyat
We pay for our own queen but honestly I wish it would stop. We should look to France for leadership because if nothing else they know exactly how to deal with royalty. 
The queen brings in more money to the uk than takes and tbh she has done a hell of a lot more good for the world than any government.
|

Roboplegic
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 11:52:00 -
[106]
If it wasn't for the British, americans today would be speaking french or spanish. Which is a good thing, even though they butcher our language with that "word book" they call the dictionary. But we dont blaim them cuz most of them can trace they ancestry back to the UK.
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 12:03:00 -
[107]
Originally by: baltec1
The queen brings in more money to the uk than takes and tbh she has done a hell of a lot more good for the world than any government.
Fair enough Lizzie's better than most monarchs but her son is a walking contradiction and her grandkids are idiots. I see no reason to bow before William and Harry and spit on the idea that those inbred English ****s could one day be head of state for Scotland.
In terms of money the Windsors and crown estates own large amounts of shares in defense and oil plus large amounts of land, we will never know what they bring in to this country or how much of their job could be done equally well by an elected head of state. One thing's for sure they are a major player in the military industrial complex and are capable of looking after themselves without leeching from my taxes.
As an example the crown estates owns UK territorial waters from the coast to several miles out to sea, the royals get payments from windfarms and that money goes straight to the royals without ever passing through the local island communities. Screw Buckingham Palace I'd rather see a new school or hospital any day.
Another point to note is the Westminster system the queen represents. The conservative government is deeply unpopular in Scotland and holds only one seat here, they have no real mandate to rule the country. We are in an economic hole at the moment and Cameron is cutting funding for schools, hospitals and welfare while pushing ahead with a very expensive nuclear weapons replacement and ID card scheme.
The Scottish government wants to scrap trident and the ID card scheme to pay for our financial problems but can't because of Westminster. The democratically elected government in Edinburgh can not carry out the will of the Scottish people because an unelected English monarch and English government who we did not vote for are treating us like a colony, taxing our natural resources and dictating how Scotland should be run.
The queen is a barrier to democracy and the sooner we get rid of the royals the better. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 12:52:00 -
[108]
As a Canadian, the thought of Prince Charles being king makes me wish that Canada would be a republic.
He is whack. And the ears?
jesus murphy
click here |

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 12:56:00 -
[109]
The Dutch have a more slimline royal family. They don't adorn themselves in old fashioned regalia. They wear smart suits and cloths. And do various stuff for charitable causes. Most Dutch are modestly very proud of their royal family.
Would this be more suitable for Britain? I don't know really. There is a lot of liberal rubbish that making the UK a republic would make it more egalitarian. Well the French killed off all their royalty over 200 years ago with great fanfare. But yet France is a more elitist country than the UK.
..................................................
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 17:20:00 -
[110]
Good points about the Dutch and french though I think the UK will need to find it's own way with this one.
From what I understand the monarchy are far more popular in England. The monarchy, crown estates, civil service and accompanying bureaucrats are collectively referred to as 'The Firm' and are a very powerful force within the UK.
They work very hard to promote British interests and the shareholders who benefit from their work are the pension funds and insurance firms who pay for our crashed cars and and ensure that our old folks have money to heat their homes, the corporation taxes also buoy up the public sector and pay for the nurses and teachers.
There is something to be said for this approach and I'm sure it is a contributing factor to the way Britain punches above its weight.
Consider for a moment how the American government is almost a 2nd class citizen that is slaved to the corporations and lobbyists who fund their campaigns. In Britain we have The Firm who stand between the government and the corporations, they have very close relations with the press and through the civil service can make life very difficult for politicians who say the wrong thing.
It's not a perfect system but I would much rather have The Firm than an American style corporatocracy.
The big problems however started with Tony Blair and the invasion of Iraq. Millions took to the streets in protest and felt utterly powerless when Blair did what he wanted, undoubtedly Blair earned the royals a ton of cash through military and oil contracts but hey, that's what The Firm does best.
This was a turning point in Scotland when people said F you to Westminster and voted for a nationalist government (SNP) who wanted independence from the UK, since then the ideological gulf has become clearer by the day. Scotland has always voted for left wing parties while England tends to vote Tory (Tories are considered a right wing/conservative/royalist party).
The tory approach makes economic sense for England but it drains Scotland of cash, not only do we have oil north of the border but we have the highest concentration of wave and wind energy anywhere in the world, we produce far more energy than we could ever use but the cash goes to London. Economically the union is harmful to Scotland and the more Westminster ignores us the less incentive we have to stick with England.
I don't know how the upcoming vote for independence will turn out but wheels have been set in motion and I really don't see Britain surviving another hundred years, I love England and spent many happy years living there but it's time for us to split. The monarchy is English and it's up to England how to deal with them because their long rule over Scotland is coming to an end.
I hope that rant was somewhat educational, Europeans tend to see the USA as one country but those who've traveled in the states will understand when I say that the McDonalds and Wallmarts may look the same when you enter an American town but the attitudes can vary so much you may as well be in a different country. When standing in Salt Lake City it's advisable not to use slang you picked up in DC, people will laugh at you.
In a similar way Americans often don't understand how the various countries that make up Britain interact with each other, I met a guy in California who wore a beautiful kilt complete with jeweled silver sgian dubh and he could tell me exactly how he was related to which clans. I'd guess his outfit cost more than an air fare to Glasgow but he'd never bothered to visit, I called him a wannabe teuchter and he didn't understand so I left him to his fairy tale image of glens n whiskey. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |
|

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 19:36:00 -
[111]
Originally by: yani dumyat
Originally by: Fumitsugu
Bull****! America's foreign policy is all to do with testicular fortitude and righteousness and absolutely nothing to do with the maintenance of the international power balance or neocolonialism. Bloody ungrateful Brits, who's paying for your queen?
Hey, stop pretending the US has a monopoly on mass murder and cultural destabilization as a means of acquiring natural resources. The UK's made a real f'ing mess of Nigeria in particular and Africa in general while profiting heavily from their natural resources and you can bet your last dollar that we'll leave Afghanistan with a swag bag full of minerals.
We pay for our own queen but honestly I wish it would stop. We should look to France for leadership because if nothing else they know exactly how to deal with royalty. 
Well ****, if you Brits decide to get the French as your leadership, who will we have to fight next to in wars? Cause you'll be running with your tails between your legs. _
Starcakes are the answer to life. |

RiskyFrisky
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 19:41:00 -
[112]
Edited by: RiskyFrisky on 10/09/2010 19:41:42
Originally by: Roboplegic If it wasn't for the British, americans today would be speaking french or spanish.
Actually no, we'd be speaking German if it weren't for one vote, which kept our national language English.
And here's a link for my proof, even though this was off the top of my head: Proof _
Starcakes are the answer to life. |

Delfana
|
Posted - 2010.09.10 23:47:00 -
[113]
Edited by: Delfana on 10/09/2010 23:48:44
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
Being an American I see Europe as the ungrateful bastards of our sacrifices in WW1 and WW2 to save your sorry asses.
And don't give that excuse that you could have done it by yourself, no you couldn't have....Russia doesn't count they would have turned Europe into a Communist regime
|

Viktor Fyretracker
Caldari Fyretracker Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 03:45:00 -
[114]
I see world politics as a ****ing contest with the general population catching the backlash.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 05:20:00 -
[115]
Originally by: bitter teabagging wingnut Nice try, shame its not the tea partiers that are responsible for the crime rate in chicago.
It was a joke. No the Teabaggers aren't responsible for the crime in Chicago. They're responsible for the lowering the collective IQ of our nation about a billion points. Racist, bigoted, conspiracy theory believing, mouthing breathing, window licking Teabaggers and/or Right Wing nutjobs tend to do that you know.
Quote: Everyone huh? What kind of people live in those areas, btw? Tea partiers and republicans?
Yes Everyone. At least everyone who lives in Chicago anyway. The Westside, and Southside suburbs are inhabited by blue collar, lower middle to lower class people who are Black, Hispanic, and Polish (south side has more Polish neighborhoods). So yes, these poor people aka that "kind" of people are actually the ones responsible for the crime and violence in those areas.
The way to fix that is to create jobs, community outreach and patrol programs, programs to keep kids in school, learning and not roaming the streets falling into gang life is what will fix it. This is how you improve neighborhoods, and ultimately our nation. And like it or not - we'll be coming for all that big fat corporate money the Right has so jealously guarded for so long. The days of "**** YOU I GOT MINE!" are over.
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Abraham Azadian
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 08:25:00 -
[116]
Originally by: RiskyFrisky Edited by: RiskyFrisky on 10/09/2010 19:41:42
Originally by: Roboplegic If it wasn't for the British, americans today would be speaking french or spanish.
Actually no, we'd be speaking German if it weren't for one vote, which kept our national language English.
And here's a link for my proof, even though this was off the top of my head: Proof
Do you even read what you link ? It says it's a fecking myth. You earlier post showed us that you were ignorant but this post shows us why, it's because you're a tard with reading skill issues.
---- British officer : "You French fight for money, while we British fight for honour." Surcouf : "A man fights for what he lacks the most!"
|

Roboplegic
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 10:33:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Delfana Edited by: Delfana on 10/09/2010 23:48:44
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
Being an American I see Europe as the ungrateful bastards of our sacrifices in WW1 and WW2 to save your sorry asses.
And don't give that excuse that you could have done it by yourself, no you couldn't have....Russia doesn't count they would have turned Europe into a Communist regime
Without Europe America wouldn't have had the same outcome in WW1-2, America would've been starved of trade and resources that the europeans had from their colonies in the early 20th Century. If liberal Europe fell to the germain empire, America would soon follow suit no doubt, if the allies fell all wouldve been lost. Being European i see America as being ungratefull hesitant bastards isolationist bastards.
|

Sidus Isaacs
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 14:00:00 -
[118]
I bet we will all laugh when we realize we are actually the same... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |

Planks
Unjustified Ancients of MuMu
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 17:07:00 -
[119]
Thread predictably descends in to 'my country is better at killing foreigners than your country' volleys.
That said, USA thinks it saved Europe in WW2 yet the worlds only super power has never successfully won a war even against minor states let alone a world war. Vietnam? Iraq? (pulling out early and leaving the country in a worse state than it was even under despotic rule doesn't count as a victory)
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 17:30:00 -
[120]
And what of Europe's standing by and allowing millions of Jews, Gypsies and Homosexuals to be slaughtered by the most evil being that has ever walked this planet? What of British Imperialism and it's effect on the entire planet, some areas of which are still far from "thriving".
The point is: Europe is no angel and neither is the US. Both have blood on their hands, either by direct action or passivity. We are all the same. We are one people, one species capable of terrible violations against our own and yet we're also capable of great wonders, and amazing kindness towards our fellow man.
As for "leaving Iraq worse than it was, not being able to win wars" blah blah. No we didn't "win" either campaign. Because we were not willing to do what was necessary and slaughter every male over a certain age, and completely obliterate our enemies. Our troops could never have "won". Perhaps vaporizing two cities is still on the collective consciousness of my nation.
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |
|

Vak'ran
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 17:43:00 -
[121]
Originally by: Vogue Most Dutch are modestly very proud of their royal family.
Not so much, most of the elitist intellectual left seems to wish 'em all gone, nicely selective in their appreciation of their functions...
With a parliament this far removed from their constituents, who would want a royal family to at least have the ability on paper to slam the brakes on 'em? Right?
But you are right in that they seem rather modest compared to other royal families. Not that they have a choice being the crown of a country that gets all upset whenever the royal sailing boat needs a new paint job 
Vak'Ran is your local official non-dedicated part-time advocate of reading comprehension and proliferation of intelligence on the EVE Online Forum |

Planks
Unjustified Ancients of MuMu
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 17:51:00 -
[122]
Well Europe is pretty tolerant of pikies, jews and homosexuals. As far as I know USA is pretty intolerant of those groups mainly due to an influence that cant be discussed here. But that's probably just media telling me what my govt wants me to think.
As for Iraq (again a subject that summons the mods) I believe that the USA and allies went in with the right intentions, but you can't enforce your views or civics on a country until it is ready to change. USSR's communism broke down under its own accord. Chinas relaxation of communist rule happened under its own momentum. The worlds civilisations are still centuries apart in their attitude to what we in the west currently think as 'correct'. (and please remember that centuries is a very short time in the modern human timeline). The best way in my opinion is to leave them to it.
OK so USA rid Iraq of a despot, but in doing so tens if not hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed. Had Iraq been left to its own devices they would have eventually progressed beyond that undoubtedly evil tyrant in their own time. Yes he was evil, but in his time only 100's to 1000's would have died rather than 10 to 100 thousands diening.
TL DR; let foreign states sort out their own problems in their own time. Less people with loves and lives die this way. |

Umega
Solis Mensa
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 20:14:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Planks Well Europe is pretty tolerant of pikies, jews and homosexuals. As far as I know USA is pretty intolerant of those groups mainly due to an influence that cant be discussed here. But that's probably just media telling me what my govt wants me to think.
As for Iraq (again a subject that summons the mods) I believe that the USA and allies went in with the right intentions, but you can't enforce your views or civics on a country until it is ready to change. USSR's communism broke down under its own accord. Chinas relaxation of communist rule happened under its own momentum. The worlds civilisations are still centuries apart in their attitude to what we in the west currently think as 'correct'. (and please remember that centuries is a very short time in the modern human timeline). The best way in my opinion is to leave them to it.
OK so USA rid Iraq of a despot, but in doing so tens if not hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed. Had Iraq been left to its own devices they would have eventually progressed beyond that undoubtedly evil tyrant in their own time. Yes he was evil, but in his time only 100's to 1000's would have died rather than 10 to 100 thousands diening.
TL DR; let foreign states sort out their own problems in their own time. Less people with loves and lives die this way.
Uhm, sure. Cause the Anfal genocide never happened, and ******'s sons were upstanding individuals with no serious, very questionable unstable mental issues much more serious and frightening than their father's, whom were successors to ******. Yeah.. everything woulda been just fine. 
---------------------------------------- -Treat the EVE Market like you're a pimp and it is your 'employee'.. freely fondle it as you wish and make it pay you for it- |

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.09.11 23:24:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Planks Well Europe is pretty tolerant of pikies, jews and homosexuals. As far as I know USA is pretty intolerant of those groups mainly due to an influence that cant be discussed here. But that's probably just media telling me what my govt wants me to think.
No you're actually right, but you forgot to add muslims. It's our prejudice du jour. Disgusting.
As for Iraq (again a subject that summons the mods)
Here's a thought: Why doesn't CCP hire some mods capable of wearing big boy / big girl pants who are intelligent enough to deal with these discussions and intervene only when people are abusing each other or clearly crossing some line rather than screeching like the kid who's left in charge of your class while the teacher is out of the room at the slightest provocation.
We're ****ing Adults. We've been playing this game for 7 years, it's natural and expected that our conversations will turn to all those naughty things one is never supposed to discuss in mixed company. The less hang wringing and pearl clutching around here, the better. Pretty funny contradiction really. Out of one side of their [CCP's] mouth they tout, "HTFU" and out of the other the mew like kittens and hiss at us for discussing "politics and religion". Bah. We should stage another uprising.
But I digress:
Quote: I believe that the USA and allies went in with the right intentions, but you can't enforce your views or civics on a country until it is ready to change. USSR's communism broke down under its own accord. Chinas relaxation of communist rule happened under its own momentum. The worlds civilisations are still centuries apart in their attitude to what we in the west currently think as 'correct'. (and please remember that centuries is a very short time in the modern human timeline). The best way in my opinion is to leave them to it.
Agreed. We're looking back at the events of WWII through perfect, 20/20 hindsight. At least in this perhaps we've evolved somewhat since then.
Quote: OK so USA rid Iraq of a despot, but in doing so tens if not hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed. Had Iraq been left to its own devices they would have eventually progressed beyond that undoubtedly evil tyrant in their own time. Yes he was evil, but in his time only 100's to 1000's would have died rather than 10 to 100 thousands dieing.
Killed by whom though? Oh sure, civilian casualties were highly publicized where ever they occurred, but who do you think did the most killing of those innocent civilians? The very extremists we were fighting against. Think about it. They would rather slaughter their own, would rather strap bombs to children than fight us. They couldn't win in a "fair" fight but their guerilla tactics were hardly original. Americans didn't invent it either, but we certainly perfected it in the early days of our independence. No doubt we attacked British troops with sneaky savagery. War is hell, it's never pretty and innocent people will die in the cause of it. The difference between "us" and "them" in Iraq was that we were trying to help the civilians. We would never use them as meat shields, or strap bombs to women, children, or blow ourselves up in crowded market places.
But yes, we never should have went. As far as I'm concerned, the Iraqi people should have continued to starve, suffer and die under the boot of that murderer. They should have been allowed to be slaughtered like the lambs that they were - until they took it upon themselves to rise up and overthrow their oppressors. You cannot "give" a people their freedom. They have to take it, earn it, bleed for it, die for it, and take it for themselves. The cowboy douchebags in power in the U.S. at the time do not believe this, and wish to spread our "democracy" (for a price) to all. Another reason to ensure they never regain power, for if they do many will suffer.
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 00:57:00 -
[125]
Originally by: Planks
TL DR; let foreign states sort out their own problems in their own time. Less people with loves and lives die this way.
The problem is this: Peace costs money / If a democratic government screws up the economy they get voted out of power / We demand bigger televisions / Governments are forced to go to war or they will be voted out of power.
The basis of our economic system is cheap raw materials.
Those materials are cheap because they are provided by 3rd world countries who have no other option.
If we give the 3rd world countries a fair price then we have to pay them more money.
If we pay them more money there is less to spend on our own economy.
Any government that tries to create world peace will be forced out of power because because we wanted a bigger television.
As humans we are torn between world peace and savage darwinism, we want to love but the reality is that we live in a world with scarce resources.
As a citizen of a western country it is nearly impossible to live your life without buying goods that have been paid for in blood. Some people may be ok with this, others less so.
If America and Europe have one thing in common it is that the voters in our elections are ignorant as ****. Very few people understand the relationship between commodities and war.
Originally by: Planks
The worlds civilisations are still centuries apart in their attitude to what we in the west currently think as 'correct'.
When Hu Jintao visited the USA the first person he met was Bill Gates. It goes to show just how much older the Chinese civilization is than Colonial America* that their premiere would rather meet a lasting seat of power than a mere president who will blow away in the winds of time.
*Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used? _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 02:33:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Zedic
The difference between "us" and "them" in Iraq was that we were trying to help the civilians. We would never use them as meat shields, or strap bombs to women, children, or blow ourselves up in crowded market places.
Our soldiers were trying to help civilians but we were not.
The companies who benefit from the Iraq war are often publicly listed and as such any British or American person claiming Health insurance, drawing on a pension or earning their salary from a FTSE listed company has directly benefited from the Iraq war.
It's not a conspiracy of any sort, it's a basic function of resource scarcity. If any one country wants to consume more resources than in can produce then it must take them by military or economic force.
The difference between "us" and "them" is a paid volunteer army vs people defending their homes with the only thing they've got left to give. Meat shields and suicide bombers are a product of desperation.
I feel sorry for our soldiers because their task is impossible. They must "win the battle for hearts and minds" while simultaneously stripping a country of its natural resources and thus plunging the population in to destitution.
Sorry, I missed something out. The Afghan people can avoid destitution but only by growing opium.
Europe and America share a long tradition of tin foil hats and and many talk in terms of conspiracies and controlling powers yet the truth is more prosaic. Through our purchasing and voting powers it is we the people who drive war.
I doubt many people within the military or political sphere want to cause death or to invade other countries.
We all need education and effort if we are to get ourselves out of this mess. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Admiral Pelleon
White Shadow Imperium Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 02:50:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Zedic
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: Zedic Don't leave out the Midwest home of Chicago aka Caprica City. 
Chicago is a shining beacon of beauty, tolerance, improvement, and near total corruption. It is *the* ivory tower to which I will confine myself, should the nutbag "conservatives" resume power. And if they do, you might as well nuke us dear Europeans.
Hope you have plenty of mace 
I've no need of mace. There are few teaparty / republican't douches running around Chicago to really cause much trouble..
LOL...
Living in the city (downtown) is not bad by any means. The worse areas for crime are the west side suburbs and south side. Everyone knows this.
For he who ventures beyond the south loop is in for a nasty, nasty surprise.  ________ Chicago players channel: 'Windy City'
Originally by: CCP Navigator Confirming that I am the best poster.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 05:53:00 -
[128]
@Yani - It's sounds plausible. Certainly you and I didn't wish for it, but when evil people are in power, they will do evil things. And they were put there by scared, ignorant (and perhaps evil as well) people. The Bush family and his associates capitalized on our fear, they talked us into signing our rights away, and used the power we gave them to wage war.
I don't agree with "people defending their homes". Suicide bombers aren't defending any home, or country. To say otherwise is offensive.
Originally by: Admiral Pelleon For he who ventures beyond the south loop is in for a nasty, nasty surprise. 
LOL! :)
I live 3 blocks from Midway, trust me I know. :( I'm trying to move to the loop or south loop at worst soon. AND OMFG there is a Chicago channel? w00t!
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 11:17:00 -
[129]
1) ...
2) To people who "fix" other peoples posts - that doesn't work. The author of the post you plagiarized might get it - but no one else is going to be arsed to go find the original and read it - thus - your point is lost. If you have something to say - say it in your own damn words - instead of merely showing how stupid you are by trying to be clever.
3) Those who say that the USA won WWII because of Lend Lease and it's industrial out put are correct. Those who oppose them are ignorant. Most of what the Soviets did to the Germans offensively was made possible when their forces were mobilized by American Trucks. The French army was almost entirely equipped by the USA and much of Britain's army as well. You could say - that it was American trucks that defeated the Axis and not be far off.
4) The USA won WWI by sending in a million fresh troops that brought about the collapse of the German lines in the west. As to the Blockade by Britain - that actually didn't have as much of an effect as the fact that the German Army had recruited to many of it's own farmers into the Army - where they got killed. The vast areas of Western "Russia" that the Germans got from the Reds when the communists signed a "whatever you want" treaty with them to end the war - would have solved that problem if the war had gone on - which - without that influx of American troops - it would have.
5) For those idiots that don't think we saved Europe from WWIII - our nuclear weapons kept the Soviet mass tank armies in check for 50 years. Although we could have avoided all that by letting Patton have his way ... no one in the west was ready for yet another war so that wasn't an option. The US and it's allies adopted a policy of "containment" whereby we sought to restrict the spread of communism until their unworkable economic system collapsed of it's own weight - which it did in the late 1980's.
6) Now - none of the above is to say that there weren't other participants in those wars who did in fact shed more blood than the US did. It's also not to say that we didn't come late to the party because of a strain of pacifism - that we shared with most of western Europe - they just had a lot less choice in the matter than we did.
7) The Canadians can be justified in thinking that they defeated the US attempts to make them part of the USA - which they did. The thing is - what that war was really about was freedom of US vessels to sail the seas without being pulled over, boarded and having their citizens impressed into the Royal Navy. What we accomplished - was in proving that we could be more trouble than it was worth to go to war with us. Britain never went to war with us again. Essentially - we proved that we would not be bullied - which for a new nation is fairly important. To the extent we achieved that - we accomplished our objectives in that war. Here - The War of 1812 is much like the Korean War - in that our main objective of that war - was to restore South Korea and keep the peninsula (right across from Japan) from being ruled by the communists.
8) Now - yes - we lost in Vietnam. The spoiled brats of my generation who wanted nothing more than sex, drugs and rock n' roll - and the moronic adults who sided with them - under two of the worst presidents the US has ever had - they ... and Walter Cronkite ... cost us that war. But - I would point out - that while we were losing that war - many of our best troops were over in Europe protecting the western portion of it from being over run by the Soviet Union. If we hadn't had to do that - then we may well have won.
9) The American's hardly killed anyone in Iraq. The vast majority of all the people killed there - before and after we arrived - we killed by people from the middle east. Iraq's dictator - killed 400,000 of HIS OWN people, besides hundreds of thousands from Iran & Kuwait. To say Iraq would have been better off under him - is imbecilic.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 12:01:00 -
[130]
Everyone who says that Iraqi people would've been better off under ****** have clearly never been to Iraq. If you've never been to Iraq, met Iraqis, seen the living conditions there, and listened to their points of view, both for and against the war, you need to really shut your f*cking mouth.
That said, I believe and have always believed that idealism or systems of government cannot be exported; they must be earned. The indigenous people must take it upon themselves to revolt. What's more, the US needs to go back into an isolationist state, keeping up only trade. The rest of the world by now can look after themselves. If and when they come calling for US help, we will give it to them for a price. End of story. The United States of America is not a f*cking charity.
One more thing I don't understand is how people look upon the US, like it's some sort of giant corporation. It's a country full of citizens and its government is going to take actions to look after those citizens. I love how people get angry at the US for doing something in its own interest instead of doing something in someone else's. That's like saying, "I hate you because you take care of your family and not mine." That's not to say that some things done by the US government weren't reprehensible, but every nation has done reprehensible things in its own interest. Again, the US is not a charity, and the sooner people realize that, the better.
|
|

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 12:59:00 -
[131]
1) Astenion, while I can agree with some of what you say, returning to isolationism ... which granted may well happen ... is going to be a mistake if it does. Last time we did that ... it didn't work out so well.
As to just maintaining trade ... that's not how that works. Trade only exists where there is military force to protect it. Right now - we largely have relatively safe sea lanes as most of the worlds major powers want them open. The biggest problem we have is pirates, who for the most part, are fisherman until they spot an opportunity - and then turn pirate, though some are exclusively pirates. But - as in the Iraq/Iran war - if someone doesn't make sure the sea lanes stay open - if it's expedient for someone to close them they will.
For those who seem to think that an oppressed people can simply rise up and over throw their oppressors ... that usually doesn't happen. Look at communism and National Socialism in Germany. When you get dedicated, intelligent people, systematically changing their societies into something out of Orwell's "1984" people just don't stand a chance against them. These governments have people on every block - listening and reporting even the slightest hint of rebellion - which is punished by the immediate death or incarceration of those involved. The former dictator of Iraq (who's name this asinine posting board won't let me type) modeled himself on Josef Stalin and the Baath Party took it's inspiration from the National Socialist Workers Party of 1930's Germany. This doesn't mean that people didn't try and rebel. One of the son's of Iraq's dictator was shot and nearly killed - the thing is - the boys father wasn't just one man - he had the support of the Baath party and they are the ones who've done much of the fighting against the people who over threw their leader.
2) Now as to yani dumyat on how the people of the third world are being exploited ... if someone didn't come along and buy their natural resources - what the hell would these people do with them? They've been living in grass huts - literally - and simply do not have the talent or the technological base to do anything with these resources. Selling them - is one way to bring money into their country. Those countries that have enlightened leadership use that money to educate their populace and try to bring up it's standard of living, to bring their people out of a purely tribal existence. There are more leaders - who simply pocket the money themselves. These leaders, not being as sophisticated as the ones I was just talking about - may come and go - but it's "here's to the new boss - same as the old boss".
And - it isn't any one country that is involved in this exchange of money for resources. It is the industrialized world that is using these resources.
Now - as to how much these people are being exploited ... that varies. The Bedouin all got together and ... sure as hell don't live in tents any more - unless they want to. At one time - the people of India were forbidden to make cloth or salt and it was their non-violent disobedience of these laws that led to their independence - which is why you see a spinning wheel in the center of India's flag. So, while exploitation has certainly existed - it's not on the same level today as it once was and the people selling the resources - have options - if their leadership is willing to use them.
3) As to this being a political thread - it is. The Moderators interfere when they choose. If it's an Anti-American thread ... the moderators being European ... tend to let it go on. If the American's start to win - they either delete the American posts - or shut the thread down. I used to show a lot of respect for and made a strong effort to respect the restrictions on politics and religion ... but since the Moderators ignore what they like and only interfere when there's something they don't like ... I've lost respect for them.
*shrug*
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 15:10:00 -
[132]
Edited by: Astenion on 12/09/2010 15:18:28 Great post. Another thing that strikes me as odd is that so many people really and truly believe that because the US has troops around the world, that they somehow own those bases. American troops are ALLOWED to stay in those countries; the American government has no say one way or the other and are merely guests. The bases bring jobs and lots of revenue to those areas, so the host countries typically don't want them to leave. However, it's all in the hands of the host government. If the German government wants all American troops out of Germany by the end of the year, the US must comply.
That said, how do you think the US would react? How would you react if you made a deal with your friend and then he kicked you out of his house and told you never to come back? You probably wouldn't give him any money the next time he asked for some. Of course he has the right to do what he wants, but that would strain your relationship. Foreign policy is no different. If so many people really and truly hate US presence in their country, then it's up to their own governments to take action. Unlike the British Empire, there really is no American Empire and we will leave whenever we're told.
I really can't see any downside to a more isolationist US. Let someone else host that farce we call the UN, let other nations give billions and billions every year to Africa, and let the EU deal with Russia strong-arming their former satellite nations. The EU is now united, powerful, and wealthy...time to step up and get to work instead of sitting around eating olives all day. Just remember that WHEN the US has to come back and fix everything again by maintaining a presence and giving tons of money every year, you know, like we've been doing since the end of WW2, the bill is gonna be more expensive this time around.
Again, I'm all for the US taking all their toys and going home in order to leave everyone else alone; I just want the rest of the world to know that they shouldn't be surprised when the US gives them the finger the next time they start crying about not having any money. It's hilarious in Italy; the people most vocal against the US are the ones who still live with their parents.
|

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 17:22:00 -
[133]
Some very interesting posts here, thank you all for a good civilized read.
Originally by: Zedic @Yani - It's sounds plausible. Certainly you and I didn't wish for it, but when evil people are in power, they will do evil things. And they were put there by scared, ignorant (and perhaps evil as well) people. The Bush family and his associates capitalized on our fear, they talked us into signing our rights away, and used the power we gave them to wage war.
While I agree to some extent the point I am trying to make is that it is very hard to separate 'we' the people from 'them' in power.
I have no idea if George bush is evil but suspect he is a human who can only view the world through his own perspective. He was no doubt influenced by those around him who included hardened cold war politicians like Cheney and Rumsfeld, people whose 'evil' deeds played a large role in preventing direct conflict between Russia and The USA and the horrific bloodbath that would have entailed.
As others have mentioned in this thread the 2nd world war led to the cold war and as part of that the Allies did some horrific things involving proxy wars and overthrowing governments. One of these proxy wars was fought in Afghanistan where we armed the Mujaheddin to help them defeat the Russians and one of the dictators we trained and helped to power was S4dd4m Hu$$ein in Iraq.
To understand why we put S4dd4m Hu$$ein in to power we have to understand the history of the IPC (Iraq Petroleum Company). When the Ottoman empire crumbled after WW I the IPC was formed as a US/European joint venture for extracting Iraqi oil from the middle east. From that point until the late 50's the royal families of both Iran and Iraq were puppets controlled from London and we pretty much took whatever resources we wanted.
In 1958 General Qasim overthrew the Iraqi royal family but was himself overthrown in a CIA backed Ba'athist coup a few years later. The Iranian royals lasted a bit longer but in 1979 the Iranian revolution led to Islamic rule from Tehran and a rejection of western interference in the region.
Iran looked to Russia to help protect themselves against the west whereas Iraq had deep ties with the west hence we gave S4dd4m Hu$$ein a ton of weapons and helped start the Iran/Iraq war, to pay for these weapons Iraq gave us cheap oil. 8 years and half a million deaths later the war came to an end.
A couple of years later S4dd4m Hu$$ein chose to invade Kuwait, I'm unsure about the reasons though the fact Kuwait is full of oil may have something to do with it. When the Allies pushed him out of Kuwait he gradually started to build links with Tehran, this didn't just threaten our oil supply but also gave the very real possibility of an Iran/Iraq alliance which would create an Arabic superpower allied to Russia.
From a strategic perspective this would mean the Russians could control American oil supplies and the Chinese would own most of America's debts. Between them they could destroy the American economy overnight and would represent a massive military threat to Israel.
If our governments had let this situation arise do you think 'we the people' would have been very forgiving? Any rise in the price of oil translates directly in to increased costs of food production, travel, medicine and more. Any government that lets this happen will soon be facing protests from it's own population therefore it is not the government who started this war, it is the voters and consumers who demand it.
I hate war and having experienced it first hand I really want to know wtf is going on and why people do such horrific things to each other. The more I look the more complexities I see and the more I understand there is no such thing as good and evil. We are all in this together and every time we open our wallets we participate in a global chain of events. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 17:51:00 -
[134]
@Toshiro GreyHawk. Very good posts, I don't think there's anything you've said that I'd disagree with.
On the subject of 3rd world exploitation I'd give the example of Nigeria. The country has no economy to speak of and the government is funded almost exclusively by (mainly British) oil companies. The British government subsidizes 'security' there both directly and indirectly through British mercenaries.
The Nigerian government collects no taxes from the people and provides precious little in the way of education or health care, The fact that the government is funded solely by oil means any attempt to raise the standard of living in Nigeria or invest in its people will result in a drop in FTSE share prices which directly equates to lower payouts for UK pension and savings accounts.
It's fair enough to say the Nigerians "do not have the talent or the technological base to do anything with these resources" but the fact is we deny them any opportunity to gain this talent or build an economy that could spread education. We profit from their misery and as such I would define that as exploitation. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.12 20:43:00 -
[135]
1) As to other nations kicking the US out of it's bases - the Philippines did just that. They decided that they were to dependent on the US and the money made off those bases so they told us to leave - and we did. They've struggled financially since then but I wish them the best. Libya and Iran are another two nations where we formerly had bases but don't any more.
2) Yes, Nigeria and some other states are among those where the leadership doesn't have it's peoples best interest at heart. I believe it is fallacious to say though that we are to blame for that. What money they are getting now - could have been spent on their people - but wasn't because that's what the leaders of that nation decided to do. As to raising prices for their oil ... other nations have done that any number of times. Western companies are going to deal with whomever is in power. On occasion - yes - they have exercised some influence on who was in power but the extent and results of that vary. Often times - there are no good choices to be made as one group is as bad as another. Additionally, industrial nations governments and corporations have rarely if ever created a government for a 3rd world nation out of whole cloth. Mostly, they have backed one of several contending powers. All in all, the CIA, while it has had some success in influencing who was in power in some places - is given way to much credit for being able to do that. Those times when they have tried to influence a government and not had the support of a strong local group - they've failed.
3) As to weapons procurement by Iraq and Iran - they've both gotten weapons from the west and the Soviet Union. During the Iran/Iraq war Iraq used mostly Soviet Weaponry though they had some from such as France whereas the Iranians used such as British tanks and US F4-Phantoms they'd gotten under the Shah. Iraq has gotten a lot of stuff from the US since we over threw their dictator but they're still using a lot of old Soviet stuff. Those AK-47's seem to last forever.
4) As to the nations of the middle east turning to someone else for help - Germany in WWII was the one they turned to - and the Germans did try to help them ... but failed. As I mentioned previously - the Baath party was strongly influenced by the NSDAP, right down to it's hatred of the founders of Israel.
5) I would find the concept of an Alliance between Russian, Iran and Iraq somewhat far fetched, certainly when it would come to taking on the US - and whatever allies we might have - to take over Oil production in the Gulf. For the most part OPEC gives the Oil producing nations all the cooperation they might want, without having to work with people they pretty much hate. The industrialized world (but mostly the USA) interfered with the occupation of Kuwait and threats to Saudi Arabia to prevent Iraq from becoming to dominant in the region. It was never able to reach a satisfactory peace with Iraq though and largely invaded it ten years later to do what it should have done in the first place. Iraq's dictator had twice invaded his neighbors, had tried to develop nuclear weapons - had developed and used chemical weapons - and was likely to do it again as soon as he got the chance, thus all the buried stuff and things he is alleged to have shipped to Syria (another nation where the Baath Party rules). The stupidest argument ever proposed is that the US went into Iraq to gain control of it's oil. It's dictator was happy to sell us all we wanted - without our having to spend a fortune to get it. The US doesn't have control of Iraq's oil now. Iraq does ... and they've got the budget surplus to show for it. Their biggest problem is recovering from the damage done to the nation by the Baathists and foreign fighters sabotaging their economy.
6) As to "exporting" our system of government - that's not what we are doing. We have assisted the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan to form institutions of their own.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Vonlutt
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 01:09:00 -
[136]
Originally by: Charles Baker What the hell is with all these Misguided Americans who thought they won WW1? Seriously read the history books it was the British blockade which broke imperial Germany by literally starving them out. And WW2 Dont get me started, Americans think they were the only ones fighting the Japanese, the British had fleets in the pacfic we were fighting campaigns to defend our colonial assets, Hell no American knew the terror of being attacked on home terriatory on a daily basis (Pearl harbour does not compare to the continual Air raids over britain) Russia paid in blood their contribution to defeating Germany with the highest casualties of any country involved, they were the ones who captured Berlin, And no sooner did you realise them as a threat you turned potential allies into enemies by alienating them. You speak of preventing the world from descending into chaos? its all perspective, sitting here in Britain i fail to see how invading Iraq benefitted anyone, secondly its none of your business to enforce your view of democracy on the world, if the people of countries do not rise up to remove dictators themselves then they do not deserve freedom. And lets be blunt, when Britain was all Empiring the **** out of the rest of the world, we atleast had the decency to lie and say we were civilising the locals, all you do is invade random nations for no reason, **** on UN mandates and drag your allies into stupid proxy wars over resources which actually increase the cost of oil instead of reducing it.
TL;DR: the USA will one day start WW3 with its insatiable thirst of other peoples resources and enforcing its views on the world, i for one hope this ends in utter humiliation for this Imperialistic and hegemonic 'Superpower'
/endrant
Xenophobic and ignorant, I can't wait until you are educated, somehow. Too much rubbish here to even attempt fixing. ! |

Henri Rearden
Gallente VIRTUAL LIFE VANGUARD Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 01:44:00 -
[137]
Edited by: Henri Rearden on 13/09/2010 01:54:13 Wow. For something that started out so funny, there are very few topics I've ever seen that are so lucky to still be unlocked. For what it's worth, I think there are good reasons that both sides have stereotypical perceptions of those living on the other side of the pond. Partially, it's due to poltiical propaganda during different periods of history, partially it's accurate (because usually stereotypes come from somewhere), and mostly it's simply cultural and political ideal viewed out of context and blended with misinformation. I've had the chance to talk to people from all over the world, and so far I have never run into anybody evil. Generally, everybody wants to be happy, mind their own business (on a personal level), be successful in whatever they like doing, etc. We might not all agree on how those things are to be achieved (for instance, because I was raised with the idea that the government is easily corrupted and not to be trusted with power, I am very much a personal rights advocate. I don't know about in Europe, but I know in the US the government has ceased to abide by the most important laws created to restrain it. Look at Bush and Obama and tell me they're not all wacko.), but in the context of EVE and friendly interaction, those differences don't matter much. It's my feeling that most cultures have a lot to bring to the table if everybody has an open mind and is willing to try things out. For example, when I visited Bermuda I found out that the Brits really have something in Fish and Chips. Smashing idea, that! Or Italian architecture.
EDIT: Or lamb dishes from France. Or the focused determination of the Germans. Or the delightful accented speech of Ireland (Liverpool, too). Or the lovely mix of East and West that is Greece. And Gaelic music, don't get me started on that. Or Swiss riflery competitions.
|

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 02:03:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Vonlutt
Originally by: Charles Baker What the hell is with all these Misguided Americans who thought they won WW1? Seriously read the history books it was the British blockade which broke imperial Germany by literally starving them out. And WW2 Dont get me started, Americans think they were the only ones fighting the Japanese, the British had fleets in the pacfic we were fighting campaigns to defend our colonial assets, Hell no American knew the terror of being attacked on home terriatory on a daily basis (Pearl harbour does not compare to the continual Air raids over britain) Russia paid in blood their contribution to defeating Germany with the highest casualties of any country involved, they were the ones who captured Berlin, And no sooner did you realise them as a threat you turned potential allies into enemies by alienating them. You speak of preventing the world from descending into chaos? its all perspective, sitting here in Britain i fail to see how invading Iraq benefitted anyone, secondly its none of your business to enforce your view of democracy on the world, if the people of countries do not rise up to remove dictators themselves then they do not deserve freedom. And lets be blunt, when Britain was all Empiring the **** out of the rest of the world, we atleast had the decency to lie and say we were civilising the locals, all you do is invade random nations for no reason, **** on UN mandates and drag your allies into stupid proxy wars over resources which actually increase the cost of oil instead of reducing it.
TL;DR: the USA will one day start WW3 with its insatiable thirst of other peoples resources and enforcing its views on the world, i for one hope this ends in utter humiliation for this Imperialistic and hegemonic 'Superpower'
/endrant
Xenophobic and ignorant, I can't wait until you are educated, somehow. Too much rubbish here to even attempt fixing.
Point of view, you say i am Xenophonic and Ignorant, i believe theses Freedom spouting, "liberating" the world, and Raping the third world isn't exploitation types to be some of the most arrogant, and disrespectful people in the world, so my challenge to you? embody the freedom of speech you preach to be exporting to the oppressed around the world and cut the name calling to those who disagree, because by continuing to do so you just prove your imperialistic arrogance.
|

Vonlutt
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 02:13:00 -
[139]
Edited by: Vonlutt on 13/09/2010 02:13:01 Or, strive to become educated on topics you wish to speak about. For instance, there is a lot of good information in this thread, surprisingly. Utilize it instead of going with what your gut tells you to say. ! |

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 02:14:00 -
[140]
Originally by: Vonlutt Edited by: Vonlutt on 13/09/2010 02:13:01 Or, strive to become educated on topics you wish to speak about. For instance, there is a lot of good information in this thread, surprisingly. Utilize it instead of going with what your gut tells you to say.
No, if you truly believe in freedom. Then you must be prepared for others to have differing viewpoints, history is recorded from each nations viewpoint and if you cant accept people dont follow the same facts as you then its your problem. get a little tolerance.
|
|

Vonlutt
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 02:20:00 -
[141]
Aside from your poor sentence structure, you should learn to, again, use information and facts instead of random rubbish you wish to spout. Has less to do with tolerance of other people's viewpoints, and more to do with your ignorance on issues you want to speak about. Quite frankly you come off as a complete moron, whereas some of the people who share the same opinions and ideas as you do, form cohesive and well thought out arguments to level at us.
TL:DR, you come off as a moron.
Done here, go forth and bring tolerance to the world.  ! |

Charles Baker
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 02:22:00 -
[142]
Originally by: Vonlutt Aside from your poor sentence structure, you should learn to, again, use information and facts instead of random rubbish you wish to spout. Has less to do with tolerance of other people's viewpoints, and more to do with your ignorance on issues you want to speak about. Quite frankly you come off as a complete moron, whereas some of the people who share the same opinions and ideas as you do, form cohesive and well thought out arguments to level at us.
TL:DR, you come off as a moron.
Done here, go forth and bring tolerance to the world. 
Excuse the sentence structure its 3:21 AM and i'm incredibly tired. And the point i was putting across is that regardless of how well structured my arguement and how well it is presented, most people here will shout "You are wrong" if it does not correspond to how they were taught the events happened.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 03:17:00 -
[143]
Five pages and still not locked. CCP must have hired a few more Americans. 
|

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 14:26:00 -
[144]
Originally by: Charles Baker
Originally by: Vonlutt
Originally by: Charles Baker What the hell is with all these Misguided Americans who thought they won WW1? Seriously read the history books it was the British blockade which broke imperial Germany by literally starving them out. And WW2 Dont get me started, Americans think they were the only ones fighting the Japanese, the British had fleets in the pacfic we were fighting campaigns to defend our colonial assets, Hell no American knew the terror of being attacked on home terriatory on a daily basis (Pearl harbour does not compare to the continual Air raids over britain) Russia paid in blood their contribution to defeating Germany with the highest casualties of any country involved, they were the ones who captured Berlin, And no sooner did you realise them as a threat you turned potential allies into enemies by alienating them. You speak of preventing the world from descending into chaos? its all perspective, sitting here in Britain i fail to see how invading Iraq benefitted anyone, secondly its none of your business to enforce your view of democracy on the world, if the people of countries do not rise up to remove dictators themselves then they do not deserve freedom. And lets be blunt, when Britain was all Empiring the **** out of the rest of the world, we atleast had the decency to lie and say we were civilising the locals, all you do is invade random nations for no reason, **** on UN mandates and drag your allies into stupid proxy wars over resources which actually increase the cost of oil instead of reducing it.
TL;DR: the USA will one day start WW3 with its insatiable thirst of other peoples resources and enforcing its views on the world, i for one hope this ends in utter humiliation for this Imperialistic and hegemonic 'Superpower'
/endrant
Xenophobic and ignorant, I can't wait until you are educated, somehow. Too much rubbish here to even attempt fixing.
Point of view, you say i am Xenophonic and Ignorant, i believe theses Freedom spouting, "liberating" the world, and Raping the third world isn't exploitation types to be some of the most arrogant, and disrespectful people in the world, so my challenge to you? embody the freedom of speech you preach to be exporting to the oppressed around the world and cut the name calling to those who disagree, because by continuing to do so you just prove your imperialistic arrogance.
brits calling americans imperialistic just never gets old.
As for WW2, you guys were doing a great job winning the war, all huddled up on your island with the germans blowing their noses at you from the coast of France.
I'm sure the amount of manpower, ships, and equipment the US brought for D-Day had absolutely nothing to do with gaining a beach head and eventually pushing the germans back.
"The russians took berlin! The russians took berlin!" The allies let the russians take berlin . ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 14:30:00 -
[145]
Originally by: yani dumyat *Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used?
There was no old America before euros landed. There was just two huge land masses with thousands of tiny tribes of "indigenous" people who couldn't even bother inventing the wheel.
The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole. ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 14:31:00 -
[146]
Edited by: Vogue on 13/09/2010 14:33:57 Since WW2 the world has enjoyed a state of relative peace unknown prior to WW2. Nowadays leaders of countries want to make money with countries more than fight with them.
Although the old chestnut of peak oil could fuel a huge war. If we actually get to a point where demand for oil really does outstrip supply then that really will create negative sentiment.
..................................................
|

Chipan Asty
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 14:40:00 -
[147]
Originally by: Vogue Edited by: Vogue on 13/09/2010 14:33:57 Since WW2 the world has enjoyed a state of relative peace unknown prior to WW2. Nowadays leaders of countries want to make money with countries more than fight with them.
Although the old chestnut of peak oil could fuel a huge war. If we actually get to a point where demand for oil really does outstrip supply then that really will create negative sentiment.
Wheeerrl the global oil production has passed its peak and is now in decline. Watch this space. What could be more beautifully ironic if the next 'big thing' in fuels spawned from some random tree frog in forgotten africa. Yeah it wont happen, but what IF! |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 15:11:00 -
[148]
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: yani dumyat *Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used?
There was no old America before euros landed. There was just two huge land masses with thousands of tiny tribes of "indigenous" people who couldn't even bother inventing the wheel.
The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole.
And I live in Canada which makes Canada a lot more awesome.
click here |

Lillith Starfire
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 15:45:00 -
[149]
Europeans? Try speaking American!
|

Vogue
Skynet Nexus
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 16:44:00 -
[150]
Smart move: USA arms deal to Saudi Arabi worth $60 billion
Can't beat fuelling an arms race at your own profit 
..................................................
|
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 18:47:00 -
[151]
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: yani dumyat *Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used?
There was no old America before euros landed. There was just two huge land masses with thousands of tiny tribes of "indigenous" people who couldn't even bother inventing the wheel.
The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole.
Your ignorance and arrogance are astounding. Why should the Native Americans "invent the wheel"? And "tiny" tribes? You don't know the first thing about North American Native Tribes. Several Indian nations were FAR from "tiny".
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima |

Berguin
MAGEN DAVID Corp
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 18:48:00 -
[152]
nice topic. The main idea: only 5% of the planet surface populated by people that think something about each other. Others drink vodka and export Annas Khurnikovas in case of need. ) |

Awesome Possum
Gallente Isk Relocation Services Stratagem.
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 21:02:00 -
[153]
Originally by: Riedle
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: yani dumyat *Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used?
There was no old America before euros landed. There was just two huge land masses with thousands of tiny tribes of "indigenous" people who couldn't even bother inventing the wheel.
The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole.
And I live in Canada which makes Canada a lot more awesome.
Confirming that Canada and Canadians are awesome. ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.14 12:27:00 -
[154]
Originally by: Zedic
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: yani dumyat *Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used?
There was no old America before euros landed. There was just two huge land masses with thousands of tiny tribes of "indigenous" people who couldn't even bother inventing the wheel.
The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole.
Your ignorance and arrogance are astounding. Why should the Native Americans "invent the wheel"? And "tiny" tribes? You don't know the first thing about North American Native Tribes. Several Indian nations were FAR from "tiny".
Yeah, your right - it's not like the wheel is useful or anything.
lol
click here |

My Postman
|
Posted - 2010.09.14 14:14:00 -
[155]
Edited by: My Postman on 14/09/2010 14:16:13
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:52:54 Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:47:49
Some stuff...
Austria: Little Germany, lots of mountains, classical music. And? Again, where's the exaggeration? Austria's gorgeous but it's also boring as ****.
Some more stuff...
Obvious Austrian reporting in:
You can call my country boring, don¦t mind, might be some truth in it.
But please, please for gods sake, dont call us LITTLE GERMANY 
Edit: Supposing you¦re a US american i¦m happy that you don¦t think it¦s where the kangaroos live.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.14 17:02:00 -
[156]
Originally by: My Postman Edited by: My Postman on 14/09/2010 14:16:13
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:52:54 Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:47:49
Some stuff...
Austria: Little Germany, lots of mountains, classical music. And? Again, where's the exaggeration? Austria's gorgeous but it's also boring as ****.
Some more stuff...
Obvious Austrian reporting in:
You can call my country boring, don¦t mind, might be some truth in it.
But please, please for gods sake, dont call us LITTLE GERMANY 
Edit: Supposing you¦re a US american i¦m happy that you don¦t think it¦s where the kangaroos live.

I probably should've said "Little Bavaria"...of course I'm oversimplifying for effect. The cultures are similar, languages are the same aside from dialects, etc. I like Austria; it's nice, peaceful, and people are very friendly. I live about an hour and a half from Austria and regularly make trips to Klagenfurt, Villach, Graz, and occasionally Salzburg. Still yet to see Vienna.
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.14 17:15:00 -
[157]
Originally by: My Postman Edited by: My Postman on 14/09/2010 14:16:13
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:52:54 Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:47:49
Some stuff...
Austria: Little Germany, lots of mountains, classical music. And? Again, where's the exaggeration? Austria's gorgeous but it's also boring as ****.
Some more stuff...
Obvious Austrian reporting in:
You can call my country boring, don¦t mind, might be some truth in it.
But please, please for gods sake, dont call us LITTLE GERMANY 
Edit: Supposing you¦re a US american i¦m happy that you don¦t think it¦s where the kangaroos live.
Would 'deep cellar perverts' about sum it up?
Delenda est achura. |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 04:38:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Zedic
Originally by: Awesome Possum
Originally by: yani dumyat *Colonial America - Question for those you in the states. I wanted to differentiate between the young country that has grown up since colonization and the old America which existed before Europeans landed. What is the correct term I should have used?
There was no old America before euros landed. There was just two huge land masses with thousands of tiny tribes of "indigenous" people who couldn't even bother inventing the wheel.
The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole.
Your ignorance and arrogance are astounding. Why should the Native Americans "invent the wheel"? And "tiny" tribes? You don't know the first thing about North American Native Tribes. Several Indian nations were FAR from "tiny".
1) Colonial America is a good term for the pre-Revolutionary USA.
2) Wheels are like ... really useful ...
3) There was a decided mix of "Native" American cultures prior to the arrival of large numbers from Europe. Of course the only place humans are actually "native" to - is Africa - everywhere else we're interlopers. For a long time, it was thought that all the Indians in the America's had come across from Asia but ... lately ... it's been indicated that a lot of them came from Europe, sailing along the edge of the Ice Sheet which at that time extended a very good ways into the Atlantic.
Your most advanced Indian Cultures were such as the Azetc's, Maya and Incas, where they had well developed agriculture, cities and monuments similar to those of the early Egyptians.
Somewhat less advanced were the Agrarian Societies that populated much of North America's Eastern Seaboard. (This where that small part of my Ancestry that is Cherokee comes from - the rest being a mongrelization of various European nations).
At the bottom of the list - were the Plains Indians who were nomadic, subsistence, hunter/gatherer tribes.
The Azetecs and the European led confederation of Indians that defeated them - could put moderate numbers of troops in the field.
The Agrarian Societies less.
The Nomadic Plains Indians ... much less still.
An example of the scale of the "Indian Wars" in the late 19th century was the Battle of the Little Bighorn (where Custer got half his command killed). Here, the Indians had about 6 thousand people, including men, women and kids. Of these, about 1200 were males young enough but not to young to fight. Using interior lines - the Indians first attacked the approximately equal numbers of Gen. Crooks column - losing - but bringing about such an expenditure of ammunition that Crook waited to be resupplied before moving on much, much later. Gen Terry and Allen - had a combined command I believe to be somewhat larger - from which Custer and his 435 or so men were detached with the purpose of locating the Indians. So ... all in all ... you've got a battle of a few thousand people.
Now - contrast that with the Battle of Gettysburg where there were about 150,000 people between the parts of the two armies contesting the field - neither of which - was the only army fielded by it's side at that time as their were substantial troops from both sides in action else where ... such as Vicksburg.
Now - contrast this with the Battle of Borodino - where there were about 250,000 participants - again - each command present not representing the totality of it's sides troops.
So - if using the amount of troops at these battles as an indicator ... the amount of people fielded by the Indians, while not always "tiny" - in many cases - was, in comparison.
Essentially, Europe, when it began colonization of the New World (and the rest of it for that matter ...) was moving rapidly toward industrialization and bursting at the seems with people.
The Indians didn't stand a chance.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 05:15:00 -
[159]
Edited by: Zedic on 15/09/2010 05:21:50
Originally by: hurrhurr teh wheel isn't useful derp derp
They had horses you knave. Sit down and be quiet.
@ the long dissertation over where the Natives came from:
They're natives as in they were here the longest and before the disease spreading genocidal European colonists showed up and pretty much wiped them out. It's interesting that a couple of you boobs consider them somehow less because they didn't invent the wheel. Possum face considers that reason enough for them to have been swept aside. In the interest of full disclosure, I am descended from the evil Euro colonists *and* the Natives who were already here (Creek Nation / Irish). Though I'm mostly of Irish descent, there's some Native blood on my father's side. sooooo
HALP HALP I'M BEING REPRESSED! by... myself.. I guess? o_O
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima Jarka |

My Postman
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 09:54:00 -
[160]
Originally by: Astenion
Originally by: My Postman Edited by: My Postman on 14/09/2010 14:16:13
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:52:54 Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:47:49
Some stuff...
Austria: Little Germany, lots of mountains, classical music. And? Again, where's the exaggeration? Austria's gorgeous but it's also boring as ****.
Some more stuff...
Obvious Austrian reporting in:
You can call my country boring, don¦t mind, might be some truth in it.
But please, please for gods sake, dont call us LITTLE GERMANY 
Edit: Supposing you¦re a US american i¦m happy that you don¦t think it¦s where the kangaroos live.

I probably should've said "Little Bavaria"...of course I'm oversimplifying for effect. The cultures are similar, languages are the same aside from dialects, etc. I like Austria; it's nice, peaceful, and people are very friendly. I live about an hour and a half from Austria and regularly make trips to Klagenfurt, Villach, Graz, and occasionally Salzburg. Still yet to see Vienna.
I can perfectly live with Bavarian culture. Been there, done that. Actually i¦m a native from Klagenfurt. 
@ Wendat Huron: Idiot, not quoting that.
|
|

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 11:55:00 -
[161]
Edited by: Riedle on 15/09/2010 11:57:12
Originally by: Zedic Edited by: Zedic on 15/09/2010 05:21:50
Originally by: hurrhurr teh wheel isn't useful derp derp
They had horses you knave. Sit down and be quiet.
@ the long dissertation over where the Natives came from:
They're natives as in they were here the longest and before the disease spreading genocidal European colonists showed up and pretty much wiped them out. It's interesting that a couple of you boobs consider them somehow less because they didn't invent the wheel. Possum face considers that reason enough for them to have been swept aside. In the interest of full disclosure, I am descended from the evil Euro colonists *and* the Natives who were already here (Creek Nation / Irish). Though I'm mostly of Irish descent, there's some Native blood on my father's side. sooooo
HALP HALP I'M BEING REPRESSED! by... myself.. I guess? o_O
haha
They most certainly did NOT have horses before 1492. The North American horse went extinct many thousands of years before that.
Of course, you would know this if you had any clue what you were talking about but quite clearly, you do not. This is what happens when your background on the subject consists entirely of a few John Wayne movies and white, liberal guilt.
Hit the books and then come back and post something on this subject when you have a clue. Otherwise, your obvious political chat disguised as a historical chat will continue to make you look ridiculous.

click here |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 15:25:00 -
[162]
Originally by: My Postman
Originally by: Astenion
Originally by: My Postman Edited by: My Postman on 14/09/2010 14:16:13
Originally by: Astenion Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:52:54 Edited by: Astenion on 05/09/2010 02:47:49
Some stuff...
Austria: Little Germany, lots of mountains, classical music. And? Again, where's the exaggeration? Austria's gorgeous but it's also boring as ****.
Some more stuff...
Obvious Austrian reporting in:
You can call my country boring, don¦t mind, might be some truth in it.
But please, please for gods sake, dont call us LITTLE GERMANY 
Edit: Supposing you¦re a US american i¦m happy that you don¦t think it¦s where the kangaroos live.

I probably should've said "Little Bavaria"...of course I'm oversimplifying for effect. The cultures are similar, languages are the same aside from dialects, etc. I like Austria; it's nice, peaceful, and people are very friendly. I live about an hour and a half from Austria and regularly make trips to Klagenfurt, Villach, Graz, and occasionally Salzburg. Still yet to see Vienna.
I can perfectly live with Bavarian culture. Been there, done that. Actually i¦m a native from Klagenfurt. 
@ Wendat Huron: Idiot, not quoting that.
Haha wow! I live in Friuli, around Udine. *high five*
|

Sral TBear
Shipwreck Island
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 11:14:00 -
[163]
Europeans on America *hmmmm not sure if i like big brother*
Americans on Europe* hmmmm think they are all commies*
60% of the rest of the world...*lets blow up America and Europe*
Think it sums it up lol
|

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 11:55:00 -
[164]
Edited by: Wendat Huron on 16/09/2010 11:57:44
Originally by: Awesome Possum
...The continent North America is covered by three nations. Canada, United States of America, and Mexico. The name America refers to the middle nation, North America refers to the continent as a whole.
Wow, just wow!
Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. There you go, there's a few other nations in North America and that's only on the mainland.
Pretending geography never existed was the greatest trick the Devil [R] ever pulled, it makes it so much easier to invade and kill those non-existant people.
About the horse, it made its way up from Mexico to the plains long before any settlers got there so yes the natives had been re-introduced to the horse before the european settler push westward.
Delenda est achura. |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 12:16:00 -
[165]
Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:23:10 Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:19:12
Quote: Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. There you go, there's a few other nations in North America and that's only on the mainland.
Commonly referred to as Central America.
Quote: About the horse, it made its way up from Mexico to the plains long before any settlers got there so yes the natives had been re-introduced to the horse before the european settler push westward.
Irrelevent. They did not have the horse prior to 1492 which was mentioned to 'counter' the fact that they had not 'discovered' the wheel.
This is what I said:
Quote: They most certainly did NOT have horses before 1492. The North American horse went extinct many thousands of years before that.
So they still got the horse from Europeans. Wether it came from Mexico or New York doesn't make a lick of difference.
All in all not a huge deal but meant only to point out the large degree in difference in development between the two peoples. The Europeans were far more developed as a society than the people they encountered in the new world.
For some reason schools tend to romanticize the pre-columbian people's as somehow morally superior to Europeans at the time when in reality it was nothing of the sort. They practiced human sacrifice and were brutal to their own and to their environment. The only difference was societal development was ******ed compared to Europeans at the time.
That's it.
click here |

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 12:58:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Riedle Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:23:10 Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:19:12
Quote: Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. There you go, there's a few other nations in North America and that's only on the mainland.
Commonly referred to as Central America...
Is it a continent on its own? No. Still filing under North America thank you for playing.
Although smart move re-labelling them something else, makes them easier to disassociate from and kill.
Delenda est achura. |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 13:04:00 -
[167]
Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 13:05:30
Originally by: Wendat Huron
Originally by: Riedle Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:23:10 Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:19:12
Quote: Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. There you go, there's a few other nations in North America and that's only on the mainland.
Commonly referred to as Central America...
Is it a continent on its own? No. Still filing under North America thank you for playing.
Although smart move re-labelling them something else, makes them easier to disassociate from and kill.
Yes, very smart. Is Canada down there killing someone now? If not, I agree we probably should be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_America
Quote: Central America consists of the republics of Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. Central America is part of the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot, which extends from Northern Guatemala through central Panama.[5]
Have a read and educate yourself. What AP said was in no way incorrect. You ever hear of NAFTA? No? It's a free trade agreement for North American countries. Guess which countries are in it.
Now, back to your trolling!
click here |

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 15:05:00 -
[168]
Originally by: Riedle Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 13:05:30
Originally by: Wendat Huron
Originally by: Riedle Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:23:10 Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 12:19:12
Quote: Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. There you go, there's a few other nations in North America and that's only on the mainland.
Commonly referred to as Central America...
Is it a continent on its own? No. Still filing under North America thank you for playing.
Although smart move re-labelling them something else, makes them easier to disassociate from and kill.
Yes, very smart. Is Canada down there killing someone now? If not, I agree we probably should be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_America
Quote: Central America consists of the republics of Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. Central America is part of the Mesoamerican biodiversity hotspot, which extends from Northern Guatemala through central Panama.[5]
Have a read and educate yourself. What AP said was in no way incorrect. You ever hear of NAFTA? No? It's a free trade agreement for North American countries. Guess which countries are in it.
Now, back to your trolling!
Is it a continent? Until you load up a page on wikipedia stating those countries are on a continent called Central America I'm not impressed.
What countries are in NAFTA is a political decission, it has no bearing on geography. EU is European Union, yet not all countries in Europe are in it or will be, are they therefor not geographically in Europe?
You go educate yourself, your reasoning powers are severly lacking.
Delenda est achura. |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 15:14:00 -
[169]
Quote:
Is it a continent? Until you load up a page on wikipedia stating those countries are on a continent called Central America I'm not impressed.
What countries are in NAFTA is a political decission, it has no bearing on geography. EU is European Union, yet not all countries in Europe are in it or will be, are they therefor not geographically in Europe?
You go educate yourself, your reasoning powers are severly lacking.
lol look, it's not my fault you didn't know about Central America.
take a deep breath and stop being so mad, brosef.
I can give you a hug if it turns that frown upside down!
click here |

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 15:28:00 -
[170]
Originally by: Riedle
Quote:
Is it a continent? Until you load up a page on wikipedia stating those countries are on a continent called Central America I'm not impressed.
What countries are in NAFTA is a political decission, it has no bearing on geography. EU is European Union, yet not all countries in Europe are in it or will be, are they therefor not geographically in Europe?
You go educate yourself, your reasoning powers are severly lacking.
lol look, it's not my fault you didn't know about Central America.
take a deep breath and stop being so mad, brosef.
I can give you a hug if it turns that frown upside down!
I know that Mexico and the mentioned nations are referred to as Central America at times, yes you read it, Mexico too. That's still not the issue, they are not a continent separate from North America. 
Delenda est achura. |
|

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 15:49:00 -
[171]
Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 15:50:21
Originally by: Wendat Huron
Originally by: Riedle
Quote:
Is it a continent? Until you load up a page on wikipedia stating those countries are on a continent called Central America I'm not impressed.
What countries are in NAFTA is a political decission, it has no bearing on geography. EU is European Union, yet not all countries in Europe are in it or will be, are they therefor not geographically in Europe?
You go educate yourself, your reasoning powers are severly lacking.
lol look, it's not my fault you didn't know about Central America.
take a deep breath and stop being so mad, brosef.
I can give you a hug if it turns that frown upside down!
I know that Mexico and the mentioned nations are referred to as Central America at times, yes you read it, Mexico too. That's still not the issue, they are not a continent separate from North America. 
Well I don't see anyone said that central america wasn't part of the continent of North America.
On this side of the pond, when one refers to NA, we are referring to Mexico, USA & Canada. So your anxiousness to jump all over the Central American11!!!oneoneone and caribean countries reeks of trying WAY too hard.
lol
Now, how about a hug?
PS: generally Mexico is considered as part of North America, not Central America. ;)
click here |

Wendat Huron
Stellar Solutions
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 23:02:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Riedle Edited by: Riedle on 16/09/2010 15:50:21
Originally by: Wendat Huron
Originally by: Riedle
Quote:
Is it a continent? Until you load up a page on wikipedia stating those countries are on a continent called Central America I'm not impressed.
What countries are in NAFTA is a political decission, it has no bearing on geography. EU is European Union, yet not all countries in Europe are in it or will be, are they therefor not geographically in Europe?
You go educate yourself, your reasoning powers are severly lacking.
lol look, it's not my fault you didn't know about Central America.
take a deep breath and stop being so mad, brosef.
I can give you a hug if it turns that frown upside down!
I know that Mexico and the mentioned nations are referred to as Central America at times, yes you read it, Mexico too. That's still not the issue, they are not a continent separate from North America. 
Well I don't see anyone said that central america wasn't part of the continent of North America.
On this side of the pond, when one refers to NA, we are referring to Mexico, USA & Canada. So your anxiousness to jump all over the Central American11!!!oneoneone and caribean countries reeks of trying WAY too hard.
lol
Now, how about a hug?
PS: generally Mexico is considered as part of North America, not Central America. ;)
When we on the educated side of the waters refer to central america we typically include Mexico too and as for anyone bringing up 'Central America' as an argument that it wasn't North America that someone was you a couple of posts up when you first introduced 'Central America' into the thread as a know-it-all remark which fell well off the mark.
Delenda est achura. |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 02:19:00 -
[173]
In reference to the comments about Native/Colonial American culture I saw this and couldn't help but laugh. The people trying to prove that Americans have a sense of humour about themselves only increased the mirth. 
I'm going to write a small essay on this subject and apologize in advance for its length, even at this number of words it is a gross simplification of what I want to say.
It's very hard to guess how America would have evolved without the influence of colonialism, no doubt larger tribes would have sought to dominate, there would have been wars and the usual mix of kindness, hate, aggression, love and other attributes that make us human.
One thing that is often forgotten however is the lack of science. We argue about the invention of the wheel or the introduction of horses from a very modern standpoint, our view is shaped by science in a way that did not exist at that time.
Several hundred years ago people believed in god and spirits, the rational minds of the day had no scientific narrative to tell them why storms destroyed crops one year yet fair weather provided them with great feasts the next year. Because of this many cultures developed anthropomorphic deities, gods of the moon or rain, rituals to worship fertilization in its many plant and animal forms, every natural process was linked to a sense of the supernatural.
Nearly every culture had a creation myth and a concept of life after death. Mostly this was linked to the land and ancestors, beliefs that grew from rational people trying to understand the land that fed them and what became of the parents who had nurtured them.
Just like empires these beliefs in the land and ancestors would spread in a viral pattern that in modern times we refer to as memes. When one tribe took over another tribe they would spread their pattern of thinking however any belief system that worshiped ancestors was very difficult to control. If your tribe conquered the neighboring tribe then they would continue to believe in their dead parents more than their new ruler.
This all changed with the conquest of hebronic monotheism (judaism/christianity/islam). By creating one god who had no connection to any specific piece of land an imperialist power could dissociate people from the fields and get them to fight for a power that could offer them and their ancestors salvation. It was a very powerful meme in a world that lacked scientific understanding.
The hebronic meme swept out of Arabia and destroyed most of the indigenous European tribes. Empires such as Rome sought to portray themselves as the conduit to god, our history text books only tell us how the battles and losses shaped Europe yet reality was never documented. Mr A talking to Mr B over a tankard of mead was the true history that shaped our world but it was no more documented than any conversation in your local pub.
When ancient people having conversations in the pub succumbed to the meme of hebronic monotheism Europe was conquered. The Arab creation myth was so good at separating people from their land and making them fight for a higher cause that it became an indispensable tool of empire. To be successful a European leader had to be seen as a conduit to god because a populace who believes in eternal salvation through service to their leader is militarily stronger than one who believes in land, ancestors and otherwise doesn't give a crap about their leaders. _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 02:20:00 -
[174]
The exact same process happened when Europeans colonized the Americas, the hebronic meme was used to define people as christian or native. It was not so much a European colonization as an Arabic one, a meme so successful that it could band large groups of people together and propagate itself through the technological advantages brought about by mutual cooperation.
It is hard to understand the effects of this without understanding what an indigenous culture is. Those of you who speak more than one language may understand when I talk of idioms, a way of expressing yourself that is specific to one language and does not translate in to another.
For example in Scottish gaelic we have 3 different words for green, when we refer to an object the directions toward that object are implicit in the way we speak. There are so many Japanese idioms that it is sometimes surprising we can use english to communicate at all, it is these idioms that define Japanese culture and make it so different from ours.
When Europeans colonized America we spread a bastardized form of the Arabic creation myth that reset the base level of how people think about themselves, the very language we use is so different from native Americans that concepts of smoke, tricksters and ancestors had such different meanings to colonials that modern americans are still ignorant of their country's roots, they look to Scotland or Ireland without pausing to learn a bit of Cherokee. It's all in the idioms.
Had America grown up without the hebronic/Arabic influence that Europeans forced upon it I doubt it would look anything like it does today. We can't say how their culture would have evolved but I'd bet it would be very different from the Americas we see today.
In modern times science has been able to loosen the hebronic grip on our thinking and we are more likely to be friends through facebook than the bible. A side affect of this is a rise in atheism and an increase in people looking for their cultural roots, the massive rise in 'pagan' religions over the last fifty years can be seen as Europeans becoming disenchanted with the obvious contradictions of the torah/bible/koran and turning to beliefs that chime with our need for environmentalism. We are becoming reconnected to the land.
It is for this reason that some people romanticize American Indians, the yoke of hebronistic imperialism is being slowly lifted from our shoulders by the rigours of science and people are looking to more 'primitive' cultures for their worship.
Today it is our descendants who we worry about and those who look in to the void of space should understand how insignificant and fragile our planet is. One day we will destroy the earth and be forced to live among the stars, ironically it is the 'primitive' American Indians and other pagans who did not forget their land. Many are looking towards these people as a way of living that may transcend the stupidities of modern politics.
Just my take on it, I'm probably as wrong as the next person but meh. <3 to all people and keep having fun  _______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 03:41:00 -
[175]
*sigh*
One of the problems with looking at history that a lot of people have - is that they are obsessed with defining the good guys and the bad guys.
Black Kettle said it best when discussing the American Indian Wars (before he got killed). What he said was essentially - that there were good Indians and Good White Men, Bad Indians and Bad White men - and that the bad people on both sides kept getting the good people killed.
There were no "natives" anywhere - because who do you define as getting here first? Certainly NOT the people who were here when the Europeans showed up in large numbers with more sophisticated stuff. There had been a continuous influx of people to the American continents over thousands of years, from both directions - most of whom no one ever heard of. Archeologists are finding evidence of many cultures scattered throughout the new world. People would come here, flourish for a while - and then be gone - replaced by other people. And - this is all about people who lived above the high water mark - AFTER - the rise in sea level. All those cultures that got here before the rise and stayed close to the shore (like those who were fishermen and came here in boats) - had the evidence of their stays submerged and probably lost.
So ... was the "good guy" the first person to ever set foot in the new world - wherever you choose to draw the line - and EVERYONE else who followed him a bad guy? Or - did you simply have normal people - going about their lives - who came into contact with another culture and interacted with it over periods of thousands of years?
The significance of Columbus's voyage was that he was sponsored by the ruler of a nation and thus had money and resources to not only come back - but be followed by others who expanded on what he did.
It is not a statement about who were the good people and who were the bad people to say that some had better technology than others. There are however advantages to high technology cultures. Seeing the world more as it is, rather than as an interaction of mythical personalities, which is something inherent to cultures with higher technology - or they wouldn't have that technology - is what brings about those advantages.
One of the most common defensive mechanisms used by one culture to defend it's actions or attack those of another (or attack those of their own if they are so inclined) is simplistically ignoring all that came before which ever event and wanting to start the game from the point at which they felt their culture was victimized. That's just stupid.
It's like the Arabs who despise the Crusaders - and yet - think nothing of their conquest of what had previously been Christian states - and those silly westerners that don't see the Crusades as what they were - a counter attack by a besieged Christianity against an advancing Islam. There aren't any good guys or bad guys here - simply two cultures in an extended conflict that lasted hundreds of years.
In the case of Islam and Christianity - they eventually came to terms with each other (by and large) and there were no more giant campaigns of conquest or re-conquest in either direction.
In the case of the Europeans and the Indians in the new world ... the Europeans simply had so much of an advantage in numbers and technology - which were a result of their culture - that the Indians lost terribly.
All of this has been taking place throughout history and what really matters to most people ... is whether or not it's happening to them. Here - while it has really come down to a case of "us" and "them" - there is an assumption by most cultures that "we" are the good guys and "they" are the bad guys - when that part is just a simplification. No culture is perfect but some have traits that are less desirable than others.
As to the rise of monotheism over polytheism ... that is commonly considered a step in the right direction ... but I'm afraid I've forgotten all the reasons why.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

yani dumyat
Minmatar Black Storm Cartel The Orca Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 10:23:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
As to the rise of monotheism over polytheism ... that is commonly considered a step in the right direction ... but I'm afraid I've forgotten all the reasons why.
The reason monotheism was considered a step in the right direction is because most western history was written by monotheists. Buddhists and hindus may have a different perspective.
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
There were no "natives" anywhere - because who do you define as getting here first?
This is one of the big problems with using nationality to define people, it is also why I tend to think of cultures in terms of memes rather than national groups. I would define a native as someone who feels a sense of belonging to a specific area of land and feels that their personal history and culture is related to that piece of land.
Someone born in modern day New York can be just as much a native as an American Indian.
_______
Trolls and Tribulations A story of eve, trolls, world domination and dogfighting against starlings in a tiny dramiel. |

Riedle
Minmatar Wayne's TV and Appliances
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 12:14:00 -
[177]
Edited by: Riedle on 17/09/2010 12:15:39 Edited by: Riedle on 17/09/2010 12:15:06 Speaking for myself, I was not speaking of 'good' and 'bad'. Although, I would much rather live in an agricultural society than a hunter gatherer one. lol
In anycase, if you are talking about an agricultural society meeting up with a hunter gatherer society and do not mention disease and germs, you are only seeing a very narrow spectrum of what happened. The agricultural germs and diseases inherant because of animal domestication is estimated to have wiped out 90% of the pre-contact population in North America. Much the same probably happened (is still happening) in south America. This has happened all over the world throughout history.
Again, for anyone interested in this I recommend 'Guns Germs and Steel' by Jared Diamond. It asks the question why the inhabitants of North America didn't discover and colonize Europe and sets out to answer that question.
click here |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 12:27:00 -
[178]
Can't respond to the question of monotheism vs. polytheism ... as ... like I said ... I've forgotten. Sure, you can say that the arguments of the monotheists are simply that what they are doing is better - but - that would depend on whether or not you place a lot of value on technological development - which has occurred at a more rapid pace in monotheistic cultures - though there could be other reasons for that. Since I can't remember the arguments ... *shrug* ... it's kind of hard to argue their merits. I just remember that the monotheists - did have arguments ... I just can't remember what they were.
Another factor in all that ... is the difference between the way polytheistic religions are practiced at the lower and higher levels. Many of the eastern religions aren't in fact religions at all at the highest levels but merely philosophies of life - where as at their lower levels - they are decidedly religions.
The problem with the use of the term "native" is the implication that this gives the "native" some kind of rights that others don't have. It's like the spray pointed signs on the board walk at the beach that say "Locals Only! If you don't live here - don't surf here!"
*shrug*
You look at that argument and ... well ... if I've lived in the city since 1965 - and I'm having some 17 year old surfer telling me I've no right to surf on HIS beach because I live 7 miles farther inland than he does ... it comes down to - "Everyone but me should leave so I can surf here by myself" - which has nothing to do with anything but pure selfishness.
If someone is using the argument that "I got here before you did" to justify their right to the land - what about all the people who got there before they did - whom they killed - to take that land from them?
Listen to the Lakota talk all about their sacred lands that the white man took from them - then listen to the Crow - whom the Lakota took those lands from.
It all comes down to "Everyone who came to California after I did - should go home!"
Human beings have been killing each other over parcels of land since the dawn of time - each justifying their actions to themselves in one way or another - but neither being intrinsically more noble or right.
You look at the gigantic swathes of land the nomadic plains Indians claimed as theirs and ... no one else is going to pay any attention to that. "All this land, covering what amounts to several states belongs to you few thousand people - just because you say it does? Like hell. We came here from an over crowded continent and we're just supposed to go home because we want a few hundred acres out of the thousands of square miles you claim? Forget about it - we're staying."
At that point the shooting would start.
Again - it is hypocritical for one group to come in - take some other people who got there first and kick them off the land - and THEN - get all morally outraged when someone else wants to do the same thing to them.
Anyone thinking that there was any relationship between the peoples who occupied the various parts of the new world when the Europeans showed up - and the people who first entered those lands - is sadly mistaken. The "natives" of this land mass had been fighting each other for thousands of years with one group supplanting another continually with some of those peoples coming from Europe thousands of years before Columbus.
But - that is what human beings have been doing since the dawn of time. Nobody gives a damn about what is right - they only care that they have - or want - something - and will fight for it.
That's what territorial species do.
It doesn't make them right ... it doesn't make them the good guys or the bad guys - it just makes them a territorial species that will kill for what it wants - be they, such as, ants, wolves or human beings.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 12:31:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Riedle Edited by: Riedle on 17/09/2010 12:15:39 Edited by: Riedle on 17/09/2010 12:15:06 Speaking for myself, I was not speaking of 'good' and 'bad'. Although, I would much rather live in an agricultural society than a hunter gatherer one. lol
In anycase, if you are talking about an agricultural society meeting up with a hunter gatherer society and do not mention disease and germs, you are only seeing a very narrow spectrum of what happened. The agricultural germs and diseases inherant because of animal domestication is estimated to have wiped out 90% of the pre-contact population in North America. Much the same probably happened (is still happening) in south America. This has happened all over the world throughout history.
Again, for anyone interested in this I recommend 'Guns Germs and Steel' by Jared Diamond. It asks the question why the inhabitants of North America didn't discover and colonize Europe and sets out to answer that question.
Yes.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Hurtful Words
Minmatar Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 13:55:00 -
[180]
Generalizations are an uneducated man's crutch.
Say what you want about each other, but this trend of lacking mutual respect and understanding is probably more dangerous to our future than you think.
|
|

Aldor
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 14:14:00 -
[181]
Originally by: TimMc As a British-American hybrid, I enjoy trolling both sides in these debates.
In the end though, I think I prefer being British because I've spent my adult life here. America feels huge - food, people, cars, roads, distances, cities, everything. Europeans see this as a facet of American arrogance, but really America has been on top of the world for a while now so is allowed to have a self inflated opinion of itself. While Europe was repairing from WW2s devastation, America had benefited from the improved industry and flood of skilled immigrants. Soon though America will need to change as China or India take their place as superpowers.
The problem with any superpower is they get to self assured. Look at the Roman empire, Byzantine, Muslim, Victorian Empires, etc. They get too egotistic and believe that they are 'on top of the world' and someone comes along and proves them wrong. In matters of warfare is a good example. Roman, British, and now American soldiers began as ragtag guerilla warfare and evolved to a honor code and made up 'rules of war'. The American revolution was in part won by throwing those rules out the window. Just like today America is getting torn up by gorilla warfare because we're too stuckup to act like we used to. All's fair in love and war they say.
America will collapse eventually. And with how we're going here the past few years I forsee it sooner rather than later. The question is who will be there to pick up the pieces? China? Perhaps.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.09.17 17:03:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Aldor
Originally by: TimMc As a British-American hybrid, I enjoy trolling both sides in these debates.
In the end though, I think I prefer being British because I've spent my adult life here. America feels huge - food, people, cars, roads, distances, cities, everything. Europeans see this as a facet of American arrogance, but really America has been on top of the world for a while now so is allowed to have a self inflated opinion of itself. While Europe was repairing from WW2s devastation, America had benefited from the improved industry and flood of skilled immigrants. Soon though America will need to change as China or India take their place as superpowers.
The problem with any superpower is they get to self assured. Look at the Roman empire, Byzantine, Muslim, Victorian Empires, etc. They get too egotistic and believe that they are 'on top of the world' and someone comes along and proves them wrong. In matters of warfare is a good example. Roman, British, and now American soldiers began as ragtag guerilla warfare and evolved to a honor code and made up 'rules of war'. The American revolution was in part won by throwing those rules out the window. Just like today America is getting torn up by gorilla warfare because we're too stuckup to act like we used to. All's fair in love and war they say.
I didn't know we were fighting gorillas. I bet PETA's gonna have a field day with this news. 
|

Capt Under
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 05:00:00 -
[183]
The American Dream?
There are a great gap between what Americans think of themself and how rest of the world think. Even most Europeans consider US imperialism (anglo americans) as one of the biggest threat to world peace. In a survey conducted by the European Commission the result was, "Europeans believe the United States contributes the most to world instability along with Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and North Korea. . . ".
Taking personal responsibility also dictate not taking any information as face value but look for consistency in words and action. Americans have stayed willfully ignorant about the creation of the Anglo American empire. This global empire have been created not by military might but primary by financially might. A good testimony from a whistleblower was given to Democracy Now.
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
The greatest threat to humanity are not some guys hiding in a cave in Afghanistan but financial terrorism. The names, IMF and World Bank are also misleading as it's not an international organisation like UN but Anglo-americans running it. Actions do speak louder than words (IMF/World Bank propaganda) and note that many people outside US are waking up by the millions now. G. Edward Griffin on the Federal Reserve System
When millions of poor people around the world figure this ponzi scheme (legalized crimes/usury) out they are NOT going to be much forgiving. Whatever we like it or not, there will be retributions and Anglo-americans will go to jail (or dealt with by random lynch mobs) on the same scale as with the collapse of WW2-Germany. History repeat itself but this time the 'liberator' has become the 'oppressor' The irony is that the monetary system in US are so corrupt now it's literally collapsing under its own weight. So we can just sit back and watch this freak show in US unfold.
Not only has the Anglo-americans banks, lowered the standard of living for many third world countries they has also done the same for many American middle class families, that now need two incomes to make ends meet while they could do away with one a few decades ago. There are plenty of evidence to back it all up but spoonfeed info dont help foster critally thinking either. Probably best that Americans learn the hard way rather than wasting time to re-educate self righteousness people. It's like a country taken from the cyberpunk novel, Neuromancer (William Gibson), where all goverments are just puppets while big buisness are running the show behind the scene.
The long standing corruption of commerce, investment and banking can not be hidden for much longer. This also naturally ties with the inevitable collapse of the dollar as reserve currency. In terms of financially terrorism, China is not a world threat. The middle class in China has been growing while in US its in decline. The economy in Asia would still be booming if it was not for the fact that Anglo-americans banks has been running the world economy into the ground. Asia has also been buying huge stocks of Gold so they are destined to do pretty well with the coming doom of fiat currency.
In the west we have been taught that we are the "good guys", politically this are true for many western countries but financially? Hell no, we are the financially terrorist and some day history will be our jugde...If there is anything we can learn from history it's that power corrupt and history is written by the winners. Financially power today rule this planet, not the military and not your goverment either.
Now personal im an optimist about our future, but unfortunately bad things do need to happen before people wake up and start taking responsibility and power back. That's just the way the cookie crumbles. |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 05:08:00 -
[184]
Originally by: Capt Under
More crap like the stuff before this ...
Dude ... did you really have to necro this thread?
Don't worry - there'll be a new horse to beat to death coming along any time now ... but this one - is long freaking gone.
Let it Rest In Peace man.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

illford baker
STK Scientific IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 13:39:00 -
[185]
Originally by: Charles Baker Being a European i see America as the ungrateful bastard child of our colonial efforts.
perhaps if you had treated us better, we wouldn't have revolted. we were tired of being treated like second class citizens, and of being pawns in your European power struggle. us the ungrateful bastard child? try you being the abusive, arrogant parent. HAND ME MY MUSKET!!
|

Open Orafice
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 14:24:00 -
[186]
Forget bad Americans or bad Europeans. You haven't seen bad till you've seen french Canadians...
|

knobber Jobbler
Executive Intervention Controlled Chaos
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 16:24:00 -
[187]
Originally by: Open Orafice Forget bad Americans or bad Europeans. You haven't seen bad till you've seen french Canadians...
|

Alpheias
|
Posted - 2010.10.19 17:05:00 -
[188]
Originally by: Open Orafice Forget bad Americans or bad Europeans. You haven't seen bad till you've seen french Canadians...
French Canada!    |

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 05:35:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Charles Baker What the hell is with all these Misguided Americans who thought they won WW1? Seriously read the history books it was the British blockade which broke imperial Germany by literally starving them out. And WW2 Dont get me started, Americans think they were the only ones fighting the Japanese, the British had fleets in the pacfic we were fighting campaigns to defend our colonial assets, Hell no American knew the terror of being attacked on home terriatory on a daily basis (Pearl harbour does not compare to the continual Air raids over britain) Russia paid in blood their contribution to defeating Germany with the highest casualties of any country involved, they were the ones who captured Berlin, And no sooner did you realise them as a threat you turned potential allies into enemies by alienating them. You speak of preventing the world from descending into chaos? its all perspective, sitting here in Britain i fail to see how invading Iraq benefitted anyone, secondly its none of your business to enforce your view of democracy on the world, if the people of countries do not rise up to remove dictators themselves then they do not deserve freedom. And lets be blunt, when Britain was all Empiring the **** out of the rest of the world, we atleast had the decency to lie and say we were civilising the locals, all you do is invade random nations for no reason, **** on UN mandates and drag your allies into stupid proxy wars over resources which actually increase the cost of oil instead of reducing it.
TL;DR: the USA will one day start WW3 with its insatiable thirst of other peoples resources and enforcing its views on the world, i for one hope this ends in utter humiliation for this Imperialistic and hegemonic 'Superpower'
/endrant
You're speaking to Americans as if we had a choice to go to Iraq .
You are calling America imperialistic? And you are from England? Is that a joke?
And WWI... we were allied with England, and if England "won" by the blockade you described, then America won as well because we were on the same ****ing side, idiot.
Regarding the war in Iraq, you speak as if Britain had nothing to do with the Iraq war, when Britain was the second largest contributor in the coalition..
Britain's government has supported the US's government in every major move the US government has made. Just because people live in America does not mean that they agree with what the government is doing.
And the price of oil will always go up, and never reduce in price. When no more oil is currently being manufactured, and we are using oil every day to power our cars, less supply with stable or increasing demand means the damn prices will go up no matter what, you ****ing ******.
If the USA starts WWIII, England will be right at our ****ing heels.
**** you.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 07:01:00 -
[190]
Edited by: Akita T on 20/10/2010 07:08:29
Originally by: Brutorr You're speaking to Americans as if we had a choice to go to Iraq.
"Why, no, officer, I just HAD to shoot that man in the balls, he was looking at me funny when I stumbled onto him in a stall when I was hurrying to take a leak... so you see, I had no choice... absolutely no choice whatsoever... none at all... I just HAD to do it, you must see that as clearly as I have, don't you ? It was self-defense, dammit ! I had to do it for the good of all mankind ! I'm the victim here !"
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|
|

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 12:05:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 20/10/2010 07:08:29
Originally by: Brutorr You're speaking to Americans as if we had a choice to go to Iraq.
"Why, no, officer, I just HAD to shoot that man in the balls, he was looking at me funny when I stumbled onto him in a stall when I was hurrying to take a leak... so you see, I had no choice... absolutely no choice whatsoever... none at all... I just HAD to do it, you must see that as clearly as I have, don't you ? It was self-defense, dammit ! I had to do it for the good of all mankind ! I'm the victim here !"
*sigh*
And this just goes to show that knowledge of EVE does not translate into intelligence when it comes to something else.
*shrug*
And ... OBTW ... for anyone who thinks there were two Gulf Wars - there weren't. It was all a continuation of the same conflict against the same man. What the father should have done - the son finally had to do - and - however badly some of it may have been executed - was RIGHT to do so.
ANYONE - who thinks we should not have gone into Iraq - is just wrong. Yeah ... a lot of those people may well be very knowledgeable about other things ... but here - we did something wonderful. We gave an entire nation of people a chance - if only a chance - at freedom. And what do we get for it? Sniping by morons ... or at least people whose opinion is moronic on this subject.
The United States of America has been horribly guilty of a number of things, things for which it should hang it's head in shame.
We sat on our asses for several years - until we were attacked on December 7th 1941 - while other nations carried the burden of fighting some truly vicious, evil people.
We abandoned South East Asia - and nations we had promised to protect - letting millions of people be killed because we thought our sons were to good to go die in a rice paddy.
But - invading Iraq - was a good thing. We did the people of Iraq a favor. We gave them their freedom.
YES - they have had to pay for that freedom in blood the way every other nation that is free has had to pay for it in blood - because evil people will come to kill you to try and keep you from being free - or to take your freedom away. That blood is the price every free nation has to pay.
And - the day we stop being willing to pay the price in our blood for being free - is the day we head down the road to losing our freedom as well.
THAT is the way it is. If you don't like it - to bad. The evil people of this world - aren't going to give you a choice.
Oh ... and for those idiotic enough not to see the connection between 9/11 and Iraq - why don't you frakking go ask - that tall skinny Saudi Citizen who sent those air liners into our buildings - WHY - he did it? Hunh? Go ask.
(In this context - go ask - means look it up).
And if you do - maybe you'll get some idea of the kind of mentality we are dealing with now - and for a damn long time to come.
We didn't want WWII.
We didn't want the Korean War.
We didn't want the Vietnam War.
We didn't want to go into Panama or Grenada.
We didn't want the Iran/Iraq war.
We didn't want the Gulf War.
We didn't want a series of terrorist attacks against our people that culminated in 9/11.
But by damn - we have a right to defend ourselves - and our interests. And if we have to kill a bunch of people who have attacked us - then that's a good thing for us to do.
And - anyone who doesn't like it - can just go to hell.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Riedle
Minmatar MARSOC Galactic
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 12:16:00 -
[192]
As a Canadian I agree with your post Toshiro
It's the fad to be anti-American these days - don't let it get you down.
click here |

Kyanzes
Amarr Utopian Research I.E.L. Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 12:41:00 -
[193]
Edited by: Kyanzes on 20/10/2010 12:43:16
If I had to mention a few states and associated thought patterns:
Texas: J.R. Ewing Nevada: Area 51 California: Governator Kansas and Arkansas: indians New York: WTC Washington DC: White House San Francisco: Alcatraz Kentucky: fried chicken :) and perhaps Fort Knox Oregon: the great ore theft... okay, just joking
Edit: White House must be capitalized... doh --------------------------------------------- Unclouded by conscience, remorse or delusions of morality. |

Kyanzes
Amarr Utopian Research I.E.L. Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 12:48:00 -
[194]
Edited by: Kyanzes on 20/10/2010 12:52:11
Originally by: Riedle As a Canadian I agree with your post Toshiro
It's the fad to be anti-American these days - don't let it get you down.
I'm all pro-american except for one thing: their healthcare system is a mess.
I mean the guy accidentaly cut off his fingers and he had to choose which one he wanted to keep because he did not have enough money to have both reattached? That is so freaking bad. Think it was in Sicko by Michael Moore. Ridiculous.
They had the money to assemble SkyLab and then deorbit it after a few years without seriously using it, wasting billions of dollars, but they couldn't reattach two freaking fingers for free, or at least at a discount. --------------------------------------------- Unclouded by conscience, remorse or delusions of morality. |

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 13:52:00 -
[195]
Edited by: Brutorr on 20/10/2010 13:57:53
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 20/10/2010 07:08:29
Originally by: Brutorr You're speaking to Americans as if we had a choice to go to Iraq.
"Why, no, officer, I just HAD to shoot that man in the balls, he was looking at me funny when I stumbled onto him in a stall when I was hurrying to take a leak... so you see, I had no choice... absolutely no choice whatsoever... none at all... I just HAD to do it, you must see that as clearly as I have, don't you ? It was self-defense, dammit ! I had to do it for the good of all mankind ! I'm the victim here !"
Akita, I regret to say this, but I feel compelled nonetheless. You are a ****ing moron.
Quote: I'm all pro-american except for one thing: their healthcare system is a mess.
I mean the guy accidentaly cut off his fingers and he had to choose which one he wanted to keep because he did not have enough money to have both reattached? That is so freaking bad. Think it was in Sicko by Michael Moore. Ridiculous.
They had the money to assemble SkyLab and then deorbit it after a few years without seriously using it, wasting billions of dollars, but they couldn't reattach two freaking fingers for free, or at least at a discount.
Capitalism. It's a wonderful thing when you have money. The could do it for free, but why? When the only incentive to do anything is money, and the guy with missing fingers is also missing money, he's SOL.
|

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 14:31:00 -
[196]
Originally by: Brutorr
Capitalism. It's a wonderful thing when you have money. The could do it for free, but why? When the only incentive to do anything is money, and the guy with missing fingers is also missing money, he's SOL.
Having such a narrow and individualistic interpretation of it doesn't make much sense though. First because having a functional society requires paying some maintenance in order to keep things working. These costs are unavoidable no matter what your ideology. For example having basic healthcare that prevents the spread of disease is cheaper, more humane and more efficient, than allowing the disease to spread in an urban area because some people couldn't afford the treatment. Treating people early even if they can't pay for it is always better than allowing the problem to grow and face huge human and financial losses later. Preventing the injury/sickness beforehand would be even better.
Second, because sewing a working man's fingers back in place is propably much cheaper, than the productivity loss suffered by the society because of the loss. Untreated injuries can also lead to future complications, that could end up being even more expensive to treat. This favours early treatment, so people can get back to work faster and be more productive while at work. Not treating people will also lead to resentment against the system. This resentment will be created to some extent by all instances of such issues that people come aware of and not just the ones they experience for themselves. I can't quantify any specific negative consequenses from that resentment, but people have to vent it at one point or it might erupt in violent outburst and that would be bad from everyones point of view.
I guess this is less about capitalism and more about lacking a good system for the society to cover such costs and instead leaving them to individuals and organisations to pay for. This leads to individual organisations having to pass on the blame and the costs on anyone else but themselves. It sucks and leads to rediculous situations at times, but why should they pay the bills when the larger society isn't willing to.
|

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 16:03:00 -
[197]
Originally by: Destination SkillQueue
Originally by: Brutorr
Capitalism. It's a wonderful thing when you have money. The could do it for free, but why? When the only incentive to do anything is money, and the guy with missing fingers is also missing money, he's SOL.
Having such a narrow and individualistic interpretation of it doesn't make much sense though. First because having a functional society requires paying some maintenance in order to keep things working. These costs are unavoidable no matter what your ideology. For example having basic healthcare that prevents the spread of disease is cheaper, more humane and more efficient, than allowing the disease to spread in an urban area because some people couldn't afford the treatment. Treating people early even if they can't pay for it is always better than allowing the problem to grow and face huge human and financial losses later. Preventing the injury/sickness beforehand would be even better.
Second, because sewing a working man's fingers back in place is propably much cheaper, than the productivity loss suffered by the society because of the loss. Untreated injuries can also lead to future complications, that could end up being even more expensive to treat. This favours early treatment, so people can get back to work faster and be more productive while at work. Not treating people will also lead to resentment against the system. This resentment will be created to some extent by all instances of such issues that people come aware of and not just the ones they experience for themselves. I can't quantify any specific negative consequenses from that resentment, but people have to vent it at one point or it might erupt in violent outburst and that would be bad from everyones point of view.
I guess this is less about capitalism and more about lacking a good system for the society to cover such costs and instead leaving them to individuals and organisations to pay for. This leads to individual organisations having to pass on the blame and the costs on anyone else but themselves. It sucks and leads to rediculous situations at times, but why should they pay the bills when the larger society isn't willing to.
No. The system in place that drives medical care is profit. Insurances companies' only incentive is money. Despite the regulations, the USA is almost exclusively a market economy, and unfortunately, that model is used in parts of our society that cant use said model efficiently.
It's sad for those who don't have money, because such an economy will **** them out sideways.
|

Reiisha
Evolution IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 17:16:00 -
[198]
Problem with most countries (including the US) is that they're forcing their own culture on others. Very simple.
That said, the US has loads of internal problems going on. I wonder whether any American actually read stuff like the patriot act, for example - probably a good idea to look into that before trying to defend their "ultimate utopia".
"If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
|

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 17:36:00 -
[199]
Originally by: Reiisha Problem with most countries (including the US) is that they're forcing their own culture on others. Very simple.
That said, the US has loads of internal problems going on. I wonder whether any American actually read stuff like the patriot act, for example - probably a good idea to look into that before trying to defend their "ultimate utopia".
Where in the **** did you get the idea that Americans think they live in a utopia?
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 17:56:00 -
[200]
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk & Brutorr
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Brutorr You're speaking to Americans as if we had a choice to go to Iraq.
"Why, no, officer, I just HAD to shoot that man in the balls, he was looking at me funny when I stumbled onto him in a stall when I was hurrying to take a leak... so you see, I had no choice... absolutely no choice whatsoever... none at all... I just HAD to do it, you must see that as clearly as I have, don't you ? It was self-defense, dammit ! I had to do it for the good of all mankind ! I'm the victim here !"
Hurf durf derp Akita is an idiot rawr chestbeating posturing arrgh
I see you completely missed the point of what I was saying, but let's give you the benefit of the doubt since I was needlessly abrasive about it.
A GOOD THING DOES NOT EQUAL AN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THING Even if the situation would be actually, conclusively and radically better than it was before, that still doesn't make it a "no choice" situation.
Picking between starving to death or eating less-than-delicious but still nutritious food, when you want to live AND there is absolutely no drawback to eating... THAT is "no choice". That is the end of the spectrum of possibilities you make it sound like. Picking between banana pudding and strawberry milkshake IS a choice. That's the other end of the very same spectrum.
NOTE : any use of the word "YOU" from here on is the "US political entity you", not "any of you individuals" nor "you personally, Mr.X".
Under no possible ruleset of common sense could you call the USA intervention in Iraq as being "something you had no choice but to do". Yes, you HAD a choice, you had PLENTY of choices, you just chose to disregard them. You could have obeyed the wishes of just about every other nation in the world and waited a bit longer. You could have let more inspections take place. You could have done any number of things with equal ease. You didn't. You CHOSE to go to Iraq, at a time when the choice to not go there was the more valid choice... and you really, really strained to find a smidgen of reasonable justification to go there, and time hasn't proven you right on the actual justification given at that time.
[sarcasm] Why don't you also go to <insert names of other countries where people are oppressed by their leaders> while you're at it, that's just as much of a "no choice" as Iraq was. Oh, right... they don't have huge desirable oil or mineral reserves underneath their soil, now do they ? Of course, for them, in that case, the choice not only does exist, but the better choice is to not bother at all. [/sarcasm]
Was it a GOOD thing you went to Iraq ? Probably yes. Was there NO CHOICE but to go to Iraq ? Hell no.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|
|

Barakkus
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 18:02:00 -
[201]
Originally by: Akita T
Was it a GOOD thing you went to Iraq ? Probably yes.
No, we had no business being there, ****** was no more a threat to us or anyone else (other than his own people) than an ant. We should have never, ever gone there, the country is probably worse off now than it was after the first time we invaded.
Originally by: captain foivos Who would recruit someone named Barakkus?
Wait a minute...
|

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 18:08:00 -
[202]
Sorry Akita, but my understanding is that you seem to think we control our government. Most of the US did not want to go to Iraq, and if people perceive Americans based on the actions of our government, then they are idiots.
|

Abraham Azadian
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 18:10:00 -
[203]
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
Oh ... and for those idiotic enough not to see the connection between 9/11 and Iraq - why don't you frakking go ask - that tall skinny Saudi Citizen who sent those air liners into our buildings - WHY - he did it? Hunh? Go ask.
(In this context - go ask - means look it up).
Could you please enlighten me ? Because I feel challenged and idotic on that 9/11 Iraq connection.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 18:36:00 -
[204]
Edited by: Akita T on 20/10/2010 18:45:22
Originally by: Brutorr Sorry Akita, but my understanding is that you seem to think we control our government. Most of the US did not want to go to Iraq, and if people perceive Americans based on the actions of our government, then they are idiots.
Hello ? The COUNTRY is regarded solely on the basis of its government's actions (and by extension, that of it's military, and special services and whatnot). What each individual member of the country thinks has no relevance to how the rest of the world views that country.
Did it matter to the rest of the world that there were heavy protests against the war in Vietnam ? Not really. Did it matter when the USA finally got out of Vietnam ? Sure, but the image was that of a beaten-up combatant, nothing else. Have there been protests and public actions against the Iraq war rivaling those against the Vietnam war ? I seriously, seriously doubt it. Will the USA be regarded any better for this one ? Don't make me laugh.
Now, it's stupid to assume each and every inhabitant of a country has any say-so on national matters, but as a whole, a democracy is supposed to represent the wishes and will of the people as a whole. While not really that much of a democracy, a representative democracy in republic form is still supposed to at least be relevant to the people's interests.
So you're left with two choices :
*EITHER* the actions of the USA government DID in general represent the wishes of the people, in which case, the people you just called "idiots" are no greater idiots than you are...
*OR* the actions of the USA government VIOLATED the wishes of the people as a whole, in which case, your particular brand of democracy is an abject failure that doesn't deserve to survive, let alone spread.
  
P.S. Obviously, there is some middle ground there, as in, maybe you (the country) made a mistake or you changed your mind or so on and so forth... but a mistake that goes of for nearly a decade ? No thanks. Do not want.
...
Each of the people in a country is just as responsible for the actions of that country as that country is responsible for the actions of any of its individuals. Take it that to mean neither is at all, both are to its fullest, or anything in between, just not different degrees of responsibility. Same goes for people as a whole and the country and vice-versa. _
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 18:44:00 -
[205]
The fact of the matter is that you are right, Akita. America's government goes against the ideals of the Constitution. The way our government actually operates is different than on paper, just as with many other forms of government (communism comes to mind). But to fix our government would probably result in worldwide mayhem.
When the government acts with the mentality of "we know what the people want", that is very rarely actually the case. Sadly, that is where we find the US government today.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 18:50:00 -
[206]
Originally by: Brutorr The fact of the matter is that you are right, Akita. [...] But to fix our government would probably result in worldwide mayhem.
To not fix your government will certainly result in worldwide mayhem.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 19:17:00 -
[207]
Edited by: Zions Child on 20/10/2010 19:19:54
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Brutorr The fact of the matter is that you are right, Akita. [...] But to fix our government would probably result in worldwide mayhem.
To not fix your government will certainly result in worldwide mayhem.
And people don't believe me when I say that what this country needs is a good, hard revolution that involves kicking out the fundie fascists burning this country to the ground and starting anew with a goal of social liberty and freedom from the vagaries of a fascist (in the economic sense) government and freedom from the vagaries of an unstable economy. Of course, it won't become apparent that we have fundie fascists in power until they start exercising it, which is going to be what happens after this election and the next one.
Libertarian Republicans are losing. Democrats can't stop bickering. All of them trade votes for money. Christian fundies call them all out on this, and though they're right, they just want to replace the American government with a theocracy.
Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
|

Brutorr
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 20:13:00 -
[208]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Brutorr The fact of the matter is that you are right, Akita. [...] But to fix our government would probably result in worldwide mayhem.
To not fix your government will certainly result in worldwide mayhem.
To change the government of the US would require literally every world power to be involved 100%.
|

Umega
Solis Mensa
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 21:52:00 -
[209]
Originally by: Barakkus
Originally by: Akita T
Was it a GOOD thing you went to Iraq ? Probably yes.
No, we had no business being there, ****** was no more a threat to us or anyone else (other than his own people) than an ant. We should have never, ever gone there, the country is probably worse off now than it was after the first time we invaded.
What happens when America's government fails its people? Remember you said that when more American cities go the way of Detroit, and worse. Certainly is a plausible possibility.. and when, instead of 10% of the country needing serious help, it climbs to 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60%. Don't think most of those people will be looking out towards say, Germany or China in 40-70 years for some sort of aid and help?
And if they don't help. Doesn't that implant a seed of jealousy, hatred.. breeding a new wave of hate filled organizations leading to terroism on the new world power soils. When you end up helping someone.. the immediate after effects are going to cause problems and strains between the nations involved. Cause n point, World Wars.. but over time.. when help was given when needed, it plants a seed that grows into a sturdy, strong relationship. Less death and destruction for everyone ultimately.
Letting a pot boil over while not tending to it.. it will continue to boil over and spread its hot mess.. it best to tend to the pot when one has the ability to do so.
---------------------------------------- -Treat the EVE Market like you're a pimp and it is your 'employee'.. freely fondle it as you wish and make it pay you for it- |

illford baker
STK Scientific IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 22:11:00 -
[210]
other countries make fun of american, and Americans constantly insult the government, but they don't get it. sure we might be in some financial trouble, issues with gay rights and such, but do you know how amazing it is that we have clean water, power, TV and internet running to our houses? good paved roads to drive anywhere in the country, we have roads that stretch the entire continent! major political powers can take charge and not a shot is fired. FREE EDUCATION. us Americans take a lot for granted (such as the free education). but no, the news only reports whats bad because "democrats ruin everything" is not as interesting as "clean water still runs through out nation, more at 11".
|
|

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 22:16:00 -
[211]
Edited by: Zions Child on 20/10/2010 22:18:00
Originally by: illford baker other countries make fun of american, and Americans constantly insult the government, but they don't get it. sure we might be in some financial trouble, issues with gay rights and such, but do you know how amazing it is that we have clean water, power, TV and internet running to our houses? good paved roads to drive anywhere in the country, we have roads that stretch the entire continent! major political powers can take charge and not a shot is fired. FREE EDUCATION. us Americans take a lot for granted (such as the free education). but no, the news only reports whats bad because "democrats ruin everything" is not as interesting as "clean water still runs through out nation, more at 11".
You know whats amusing? Countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and many other European countries have everything we have, and more: Free College, Free Healthcare, little to no issues with gay rights, little to no issues with ********* and other low-level drugs, a political system not quite as vulnerable to corporatism, and numerous other things.
Not only that, be they're generally happier on average than we are. Sure, America is better than Somalia, but you know what? That's like saying Mohammad Ali is a better boxer than an 8-year old girl. Have an even match, people, please.
EDIT: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
ah misshed da shnipe.
ah phail at shniapin'.
Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 22:47:00 -
[212]
...not to speak of the quality of the "free education" the USA kids get  _
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Malcanis
Caldari Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 22:51:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Brutorr
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Brutorr The fact of the matter is that you are right, Akita. [...] But to fix our government would probably result in worldwide mayhem.
To not fix your government will certainly result in worldwide mayhem.
To change the government of the US would require literally every American to stop listening to talk radio, calm the **** down for a minute and start thinking clearly
fyp
Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. |

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 22:55:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Brutorr
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Brutorr The fact of the matter is that you are right, Akita. [...] But to fix our government would probably result in worldwide mayhem.
To not fix your government will certainly result in worldwide mayhem.
To change the government of the US would require literally every American to stop listening to talk radio, calm the **** down for a minute and start thinking clearly
fyp
MUST. KILL. LIMBAUGH.
Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
|

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.10.20 23:41:00 -
[215]
Originally by: illford baker other countries make fun of american, and Americans constantly insult the government, but they don't get it. sure we might be in some financial trouble, issues with gay rights and such, but do you know how amazing it is that we have clean water, power, TV and internet running to our houses? good paved roads to drive anywhere in the country, we have roads that stretch the entire continent! major political powers can take charge and not a shot is fired. FREE EDUCATION. us Americans take a lot for granted (such as the free education). but no, the news only reports whats bad because "democrats ruin everything" is not as interesting as "clean water still runs through out nation, more at 11".
I understand where you're coming from, and it's good to be an optimist sometimes. However, I must point some things out.
Where is this free education? I sincerely hope you aren't talking about the public school system in the US because being home schooled is running a close second to our school system. All European countries also have free education. Of course you know that higher education is anything but free in the US; if anything, it's ridiculously expensive and only reserved for those who fall into certain tax brackets. If you were an above average student from a middle class family, you can forget about a prestigious university. People join the military in order to simply go to college...don't you find anything wrong with that? That's coming from a veteran, btw.
But do you know what REALLY IS almost free? Most European universities. They're not free because you have to pay taxes for them, which run between 1000 to 3000 euros per year IF you're in a middle class or higher family. If you're from a low-income family, however, they're free.
All those things you listed would be great achievements if we lived in 1910 instead of 2010. The leader of the free world has a lot of work to do to catch up with everyone else. Ironic. I'm not saying not to be thankful for what we have but rather to expect more from both our government and ourselves.
By the way, it's "We" Americans, not "Us" Americans. The fact of the matter is our education system is in the crapper and we're all becoming dumber because of it, whether directly because we went through the system or indirectly because we have to constantly live around morons.
|

Umega
Solis Mensa
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 00:03:00 -
[216]
Again.. folks..
Remember where a portion of American tax money goes. The military.. that is partially put into bases across the world. That your governments allow on their soil.. why do they allow it? So they can allocate their taxes towards other things instead of their own military. Do.. keep that tiny lil aspect in mind.
And again.. I don't care if we pull all troops back. Would suit me just fine to go pre-WW2 and become isolated. Would probably benefit us more so than the rest of the world. Might want to ponder the implications of this on your own economies and allocation of taxes. Resources don't protect themselves.
---------------------------------------- -Treat the EVE Market like you're a pimp and it is your 'employee'.. freely fondle it as you wish and make it pay you for it- |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 01:25:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Abraham Azadian
Originally by: Toshiro GreyHawk
Oh ... and for those idiotic enough not to see the connection between 9/11 and Iraq - why don't you frakking go ask - that tall skinny Saudi Citizen who sent those air liners into our buildings - WHY - he did it? Hunh? Go ask.
(In this context - go ask - means look it up).
Could you please enlighten me ? Because I feel challenged and idotic on that 9/11 Iraq connection.
OK ...
Quote:
The Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990 had put the kingdom and its ruling House of Saud at risk. The world's most valuable oil fields were within easy striking distance of Iraqi forces in Kuwait, and ******'s call to pan-Arab/Islamism could potentially rally internal dissent. bin Laden met with King Fahd, and Sultan, Minister of Defence of Saudi Arabia, telling them not to depend on non-Muslim troops, and offered to help defend Saudi Arabia with his mujahideen fighters. Bin Laden's offer was rebuffed, and after the American offer to help repel Iraq from Kuwait was accepted, involving deploying U.S. troops in Saudi territory,[52] he publicly denounced Saudi Arabia's dependence on the U.S. military, as he believed the presence of foreign troops in the "land of the two mosques" (Mecca and Medina) profaned sacred soil. Bin Laden's criticism of the Saudi monarchy led that government to attempt to silence him.
Shortly after Saudi Arabia permitted U.S. troops on Saudi soil, bin Laden turned his attention to attacks on the west.
From: Wikipedia on OBL.
In short - we profaned the sacred soil of his nation by putting our infidel feet on it - in order to protect it from another Muslim country. That - is why he attacked us.
In other words - the man is a idiot.
Oh ... but in looking that up I did find an error in what I said ... he is no longer a Saudi Citizen ...
Akita and I seem to have had a bit of a misunderstanding as to the point of that post.
As to all the tiny little nations like Holland and such that have blithely gone about their lives while larger nations protected their asses and did all the dying ... yeah ... it must be nice. No responsibilities. Just sit back on your ass, sip your cocoa and feel superior to everyone else.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Toshiro GreyHawk
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 02:15:00 -
[218]
Sorry 'bout the double post ... but so much idiocy to respond to and so little room ...
As to why don't we go in and intervene with every petty dictator and free their people too? Two things.
1) Acting like there is something wrong with protecting the source of our oil imports - is imbecilic. Our economy is dependent on that oil. Peoples lives are dependent on that oil. You are damn right we'll fight for it. It's not like it's pretty, shiny gold we can hoard in Fort Knox like some greedy dwarfs out of Tolkien. It is our nations life blood - and that of everyone else in the industrial world as well. Anyone who acts like we're just a bunch of greedy bastards for caring about that oil - is like some idiotic punk demonstrator out there railing at the G8.
That said - we didn't go into Iraq for the oil. Anyone saying that is just revealing their stupidity. The previous government would have been HAPPY to have sold us all the oil we wanted - at a much cheaper price than we have paid in money alone for freeing Iraq from that government - not to mention the lives we lost.
2) Oh and ... yes ... we SHOULD intervene in all those despotic countries and free them from their dictators - but - we'd catch just as much hell for doing that as we do for things that mean more to us - and ... we are a fat, lazy people who can scarcely be bothered to do the things we have to do - much less get ourselves killed for people we frankly don't give a damn about. But - of course - the UN ... or Europe ... they could all go rescue those people from their despotic dictators too ... but they sure as hell aren't going to bother either. That said - when nature turns things to instant **** somewhere - US Helicopters are usually among the first on the scene. Our economy is in the tank, we don't have an unlimited supply of those helicopters or the food they deliver - but we are out there - helping people who might just wish we were all dead. It isn't all we or the rest of the industrialized world should be doing ... but it is something ... and more than a lot of other countries do. However fat ... lazy and uncaring we may be - when someone else is doing as much for the rest of the world as we do - then they can talk. Until then - they can just STFU.
Orbiting vs. Kiting Faction Schools |

Ademaro Imre
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.10.21 22:42:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Zions Child
You know whats amusing? Countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and many other European countries have everything we have, and more: Free College, Free Healthcare, little to no issues with gay rights, little to no issues with ********* and other low-level drugs, a political system not quite as vulnerable to corporatism, and numerous other things.
You really think its free? You honestly think professors work for free? Landlords and builders build the schools and hospitals for free? You believe doctors and nurse dpursue their professions without pay? You believe the supplies are manufactured and delivered for free and that there is no cost to be borne by anyone? 
|

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 00:46:00 -
[220]
Originally by: Ademaro Imre
Originally by: Zions Child
You know whats amusing? Countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and many other European countries have everything we have, and more: Free College, Free Healthcare, little to no issues with gay rights, little to no issues with ********* and other low-level drugs, a political system not quite as vulnerable to corporatism, and numerous other things.
You really think its free? You honestly think professors work for free? Landlords and builders build the schools and hospitals for free? You believe doctors and nurse dpursue their professions without pay? You believe the supplies are manufactured and delivered for free and that there is no cost to be borne by anyone? 
You're clearly an idiot. The person I was responding to had remarked how America has similar things. You know how we get those in America? Taxes. You know how they get them in Europe? Taxes. Guess what. Taxes make governments work. Basic Macroeconomics. But you're just attacking a straw man, and you seem to have a thing for arguing with me recently.
Have fun looking like a ****** if you really want to mess with me.
Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
|
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 00:51:00 -
[221]
Originally by: Ademaro Imre
Originally by: Zions Child You know whats amusing? Countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, and many other European countries have everything we have, and more: Free College, Free Healthcare, little to no issues with gay rights, little to no issues with ********* and other low-level drugs, a political system not quite as vulnerable to corporatism, and numerous other things.
You really think its free? You honestly think professors work for free? Landlords and builders build the schools and hospitals for free? You believe doctors and nurse dpursue their professions without pay? You believe the supplies are manufactured and delivered for free and that there is no cost to be borne by anyone? 
Ok, call them "complimentary" if you like, but the concept is the same - there is no (significant) ADDITIONAL charge on top of what you already pay taxes-wise. You know, the same way the military or the police of your country is supposed to do some stuff for you at no additional charge. It's not "gratis", you paid for it with your taxes. You just don't need to pay extra "per intervention". It would be so HILARIOUS to have police ask for your credit card before they start negotiating in hostage situations, or stuff like that. Oh, what do you say, some firefighters already refused to put down a fire because the owner didn't pay the taxes, and refused to take an intervention fee ?
 _
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 01:02:00 -
[222]
Originally by: Akita T Quality Post
Hold on Akita, don't waste your very good posting ability on this loser. I just found out hes the moron who suggested that the world was going to end in 2012 because of a "Coronal Mass Ejection with the force of a 100 million hydrogen bombs!?!?!?!elevntyone!"
Seriously. He's ******ed. Almost feel bad for him.
Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 01:05:00 -
[223]
Oh, I remember that thread... but I'm bad with remembering names of people I don't give a fudge about  _
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Zions Child
Caldari Carthage Industries Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 01:11:00 -
[224]
Originally by: Akita T Oh, I remember that thread... but I'm bad with remembering names of people I don't give a fudge about 
Heh, I wasn't here for that particularly enlightening display of idiocy, so I went to his recent post history and found it. If I get into an argument with someone I don't know, I figure I'll find out as much as I can about them, right?

Originally by: CCP Shadow *snip* Castration successful. Shadow.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 02:17:00 -
[225]
But it saves so much time to just assume everybody is somewhat stupid, and hope to be pleasantly surprised  _
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

V'hellu
|
Posted - 2010.10.22 04:32:00 -
[226]
Originally by: Atticus Fynch How Americans see Europe
How Europe sees America.
That concludes our lesson.

Of all areas to not include as having rednecks, texas wasn't included??? Neither was Arkansas, or Tennessee? I'm just dumbfounded at that.
Also, how americans see europeans: take a damn bath.
Jk.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 20:13:00 -
[227]
So I've just returned from a week in Rome. Every time I go to Europe, it's harder to come home again. Know how I could tell when I was around other Americans? They were fat, loud and obnoxiously self centered. :(
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima Jarka |

Astenion
Blame The Bunny Bunny Nation
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 20:23:00 -
[228]
Originally by: Zedic So I've just returned from a week in Rome. Every time I go to Europe, it's harder to come home again. Know how I could tell when I was around other Americans? They were fat, loud and obnoxiously self centered. :(
Rome's a fantastic place...there's literally an endless supply of culture, education, entertainment, and enjoyment to be had there. The people are great, the food is out of this world and there is no shortage of stimulation for all of your senses. I live in the northern part of Italy and I love it here, but if I were able I'd move to Rome in a second.
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 20:24:00 -
[229]
Originally by: Riedle
haha
They most certainly did NOT have horses before 1492. The North American horse went extinct many thousands of years before that.
Of course, you would know this if you had any clue what you were talking about but quite clearly, you do not. This is what happens when your background on the subject consists entirely of a few John Wayne movies and white, liberal guilt.
Hit the books and then come back and post something on this subject when you have a clue. Otherwise, your obvious political chat disguised as a historical chat will continue to make you look ridiculous.

derp derp, I have no sense of humor ~ therefore I can't imagine that he already knew that, indeed I shall assume that he didn't and thus I will tell him to "hit the books" and to "leave the debate and come back when he is smahrt~errr."
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima Jarka |

ceaon
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 21:16:00 -
[230]
Edited by: ceaon on 23/10/2010 21:18:36 just want to post this:
HELLO  
some of you really need it edit center ftw
Originally by: CCP Adida The male thread was locked because the discussion turned into transsexuals and man boobs.
|
|

Zedic
Amarr Universalis Imperium Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.10.23 22:55:00 -
[231]
Originally by: Astenion
Originally by: Zedic So I've just returned from a week in Rome. Every time I go to Europe, it's harder to come home again. Know how I could tell when I was around other Americans? They were fat, loud and obnoxiously self centered. :(
Rome's a fantastic place...there's literally an endless supply of culture, education, entertainment, and enjoyment to be had there. The people are great, the food is out of this world and there is no shortage of stimulation for all of your senses. I live in the northern part of Italy and I love it here, but if I were able I'd move to Rome in a second.
yes it is! People are amazing, friendly, welcoming etc. The only problem we had was finding good food... We were staying in a hostel near Termini station (Roma station? *shrug*). None of the restaurants around there good. The only good place I remember eating at was down the street from St. Peter's Basilica and good lord, that place is huge. 
"Zedic, would probably, somehow, make it all blow up." - Akima Jarka |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: [one page] |