Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 02:29:00 -
[241] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:The only way foster this to happen soon is to make many items require more low/null sec minerals to remove the stockpile fast. The who know how the economy would be once it's all drained and only what's mined gets on the market. Price would go up or those items would get less used. I guess they could bump lets say everything T2 while letting T1 as it is now. Most high sec stuff only require T1 anyway. or they could just change the belt spawns in high sec, and shuffle the 0.8-1.0 rock size belts down to 0.5-0.7. maybe leave some noob systems with a little rock.
So we will take the currently easy to mine ore and make them harder to mine. This will reduce the supply of said ore which eman even higher price on those ore.
Good idea sir.
yeah... |

Pipa Porto
1091
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 02:44:00 -
[242] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:The only way foster this to happen soon is to make many items require more low/null sec minerals to remove the stockpile fast. The who know how the economy would be once it's all drained and only what's mined gets on the market. Price would go up or those items would get less used. I guess they could bump lets say everything T2 while letting T1 as it is now. Most high sec stuff only require T1 anyway. or they could just change the belt spawns in high sec, and shuffle the 0.8-1.0 rock size belts down to 0.5-0.7. maybe leave some noob systems with a little rock. So we will take the currently easy to mine ore and make them harder to mine. This will reduce the supply of said ore which eman even higher price on those ore. Good idea sir. yeah...
Since when is mining in .5 harder than mining in 1.0? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 03:30:00 -
[243] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:The only way foster this to happen soon is to make many items require more low/null sec minerals to remove the stockpile fast. The who know how the economy would be once it's all drained and only what's mined gets on the market. Price would go up or those items would get less used. I guess they could bump lets say everything T2 while letting T1 as it is now. Most high sec stuff only require T1 anyway. or they could just change the belt spawns in high sec, and shuffle the 0.8-1.0 rock size belts down to 0.5-0.7. maybe leave some noob systems with a little rock. So we will take the currently easy to mine ore and make them harder to mine. This will reduce the supply of said ore which eman even higher price on those ore. Good idea sir. yeah... Since when is mining in .5 harder than mining in 1.0?
1st for the really beginner miner, a belt rat in 0.5 is problematic. An Osprey for example will ahve trouble dealing with a 0.5 belt rat.
2nd, I was assuming they would replace the current belt with the "smaller" ones seen in higher sec system like putting only the current 1.0 belt in 0.6. This make them "harder" to mine because there would just not be as much ore to mine total. If he only meant to put them there as extra, then it ahs no change at all because of course it's not really harder once you can deal with the rats. |

Pipa Porto
1094
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 03:38:00 -
[244] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:1st for the really beginner miner, a belt rat in 0.5 is problematic. An Osprey for example will ahve trouble dealing with a 0.5 belt rat. The Osprey has plenty of room to fit a launcher and drones.
Also, the really beginner miner isn't the market setter. So we're not talking about them when we're talking about ore/mineral prices.
Quote:2nd, I was assuming they would replace the current belt with the "smaller" ones seen in higher sec system like putting only the current 1.0 belt in 0.6. This make them "harder" to mine because there would just not be as much ore to mine total. If he only meant to put them there as extra, then it ahs no change at all because of course it's not really harder once you can deal with the rats.
Then it's still easier to mine in .6 than 1.0 space. It's just "harder" overall. But unless it gets to the point where HS is getting mined out before it can regenerate, that's not going to reduce the supply significantly. It'll just **** off the miners. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 03:47:00 -
[245] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote: Then it's still easier to mine in .6 than 1.0 space. It's just "harder" overall. But unless it gets to the point where HS is getting mined out before it can regenerate, that's not going to reduce the supply significantly. It'll just **** off the miners.
But even there, the idea is bad because anything cutting the supply of low end ore will only make the current imbalance even bigger. If you want to make ore in low and null sec worth more, you don't put a single stick in the wheels of high sec miner. You either remove some of the sticks in thier wheels so they can overmine or increase the demand for high end ore to raise thier price.
You could also but even more sticks in low/null sec miner's wheel but thats not a good diea imo. They seem to deal with enough crap already. |

Pipa Porto
1096
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 05:18:00 -
[246] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: Then it's still easier to mine in .6 than 1.0 space. It's just "harder" overall. But unless it gets to the point where HS is getting mined out before it can regenerate, that's not going to reduce the supply significantly. It'll just **** off the miners.
But even there, the idea is bad because anything cutting the supply of low end ore will only make the current imbalance even bigger. If you want to make ore in low and null sec worth more, you don't put a single stick in the wheels of high sec miner. You either remove some of the sticks in thier wheels so they can overmine or increase the demand for high end ore to raise thier price. You could also but even more sticks in low/null sec miner's wheel but thats not a good diea imo. They seem to deal with enough crap already.
I think we're talking past each other. I never said the idea was a good one. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Skeln Thargensen
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 17:13:00 -
[247] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:The only way foster this to happen soon is to make many items require more low/null sec minerals to remove the stockpile fast. The who know how the economy would be once it's all drained and only what's mined gets on the market. Price would go up or those items would get less used. I guess they could bump lets say everything T2 while letting T1 as it is now. Most high sec stuff only require T1 anyway. or they could just change the belt spawns in high sec, and shuffle the 0.8-1.0 rock size belts down to 0.5-0.7. maybe leave some noob systems with a little rock. So we will take the currently easy to mine ore and make them harder to mine. This will reduce the supply of said ore which eman even higher price on those ore. Good idea sir. yeah...
Do you think high-sec miners influence the price of ore that much? Hulkageddon and the last update didn't seem to do jack to them as far as I can see.
couldn't warp into a belt without tripping over 3 retrievers about a month ago. prices should have gone down but they didn't. Yeah well does your corp get free bacon? |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
917
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 17:19:00 -
[248] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:1st for the really beginner miner, a belt rat in 0.5 is problematic. An Osprey for example will ahve trouble dealing with a 0.5 belt rat.  The Osprey has plenty of room to fit a launcher and drones.
Matters not. When I started 2 1/2 yrs ago, yes an Osprey had issues with the .5 rats. Sheesh. You just love pooh-poohing every statement made on the Forums. |

Vanria Vexed
Posiden Industrial
13
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 17:47:00 -
[249] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:The only way foster this to happen soon is to make many items require more low/null sec minerals to remove the stockpile fast. The who know how the economy would be once it's all drained and only what's mined gets on the market. Price would go up or those items would get less used. I guess they could bump lets say everything T2 while letting T1 as it is now. Most high sec stuff only require T1 anyway. or they could just change the belt spawns in high sec, and shuffle the 0.8-1.0 rock size belts down to 0.5-0.7. maybe leave some noob systems with a little rock. So we will take the currently easy to mine ore and make them harder to mine. This will reduce the supply of said ore which eman even higher price on those ore. Good idea sir. yeah... Do you think high-sec miners influence the price of ore that much? Hulkageddon and the last update didn't seem to do jack to them as far as I can see. couldn't warp into a belt without tripping over 3 retrievers about a month ago. prices should have gone down but they didn't.
The massive banning of bots and the continued effort to keep them out of the game has also contributed to the higher but steady prices we are seeing currently for the high sec minerals. I'm sure we now have more players actually doing work mining and wanting to get decent pay for their efforts in high sec. These players aren't worried about pricing the minerals to move, they set their prices and go mine more. Contrary to this is the nullsec minerals where everyone supplying is undercutting each other into the ground just to get the minerals to move. There seems to be an abundance of supply compared to how much is actually moving on the market to be used. Playing EVE at times feels like putting a 10000 piece puzzle together, enjoying the accomplishment of succedding in completing it, then having some random stranger walk by and flip your table over. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 21:01:00 -
[250] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:1st for the really beginner miner, a belt rat in 0.5 is problematic. An Osprey for example will ahve trouble dealing with a 0.5 belt rat.  The Osprey has plenty of room to fit a launcher and drones. Matters not. When I started 2 1/2 yrs ago, yes an Osprey had issues with the .5 rats. Sheesh. You just love pooh-poohing every statement made on the Forums.
I didn;t want to push this one furhter but the real problem is the beginner miner have close to 2 support skill. His shield skill are crap and so are his launcher skill. A T1 light missile launcher with super basic skill has trouble dealing with a .5 rat and your basic tank melt away kinda fast. Been there about 1,5 month ago so I clearly remember asking fleetmate to stop chatting and setting thier damn drone on the rat eating me.
Of course as Pipa said tho, it was a bad argument as the Osprey miner has close to 0 influence on the market price. He only has a potential small influence if he was potentially to become at least a barge miner but even at that point, the total market is too big... |
|

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 21:07:00 -
[251] - Quote
Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Skeln Thargensen wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:The only way foster this to happen soon is to make many items require more low/null sec minerals to remove the stockpile fast. The who know how the economy would be once it's all drained and only what's mined gets on the market. Price would go up or those items would get less used. I guess they could bump lets say everything T2 while letting T1 as it is now. Most high sec stuff only require T1 anyway. or they could just change the belt spawns in high sec, and shuffle the 0.8-1.0 rock size belts down to 0.5-0.7. maybe leave some noob systems with a little rock. So we will take the currently easy to mine ore and make them harder to mine. This will reduce the supply of said ore which eman even higher price on those ore. Good idea sir. yeah... Do you think high-sec miners influence the price of ore that much? Hulkageddon and the last update didn't seem to do jack to them as far as I can see. couldn't warp into a belt without tripping over 3 retrievers about a month ago. prices should have gone down but they didn't.
Raise high end mineral demand or lower the supply. Those are the 2 way to increase the high end ore value. At the same time, you must not affect low end minerals supply/demand or the effect will be partially absorbed. |

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 21:17:00 -
[252] - Quote
So nerf one groups income so the other group can make more isk sounds a bit ya know R3TARDED |

Herr Hammer Draken
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
111
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 06:16:00 -
[253] - Quote
Cap James Tkirk wrote:So nerf one groups income so the other group can make more isk sounds a bit ya know R3TARDED
seriously if you want high ends to stop dropping like stones GTFO out of null less supply = greater demand = better prices ccp shouldnt fix this as its a player driven economy and should be left alone
let the players fix it
Here, here I so agree!
Still waiting for the price to crash on high sec ores. However since the barge changes one month ago many of these miners if not most of them have been stock piling their ore not yet ready to make that trip to market. We may have to wait until they all begin to bring their loads to market before we see price movement. Should be the next week or so for most I think. Some are already moving loads to market. A lot of these guys are going to need to sell enough ore to plex accounts. Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet" |

Tikera Tissant
42
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 06:52:00 -
[254] - Quote
The big alliances have mining ops which mine everything, and not just ABC. And they use it to built a hell of a lot of things, not just T1 ships. Because of building spreas, some of them have to import ore from high-sec in order to keep up with the demand on building. This affect the ore price.
Why one high-sec mineral price jumps, is mainly because of what alliance is currently speed building and their region. Some regions, even with ABC ore, are completely short of iso for example, which causes that mineral to become in a very high demand.
This is the market and inflation. Its not ore imbalancing. People have more isk because of FW, doing incursions before the nerf (and after) and so on, renting fees in null space and so on. So they can afford to pay more, which means builders sell for more, and ore miners sell for more. A year ago you could only do about 3/4 to half of what you are doing today, but you also payed less for other things, plex costed almost half of what it cost today. So of course the prices are higher. No s**h sherlock.
And as stated earlier, there is no freakin any risk in mining in 0.0 space. Most of these systems are either completely empty, or have mining ops backed-up by guards and intel. The only place with real risk is in WHs, where you can't have real intel or know what is coming, unless you are a serious paranoid person. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 14:13:00 -
[255] - Quote
Tikera Tissant wrote:The big alliances have mining ops which mine everything, and not just ABC. And they use it to built a hell of a lot of things, not just T1 ships. Because of building spreas, some of them have to import ore from high-sec in order to keep up with the demand on building. This affect the ore price.
Why one high-sec mineral price jumps, is mainly because of what alliance is currently speed building and their region. Some regions, even with ABC ore, are completely short of iso for example, which causes that mineral to become in a very high demand.
This is the market and inflation. Its not ore imbalancing. People have more isk because of FW, doing incursions before the nerf (and after) and so on, renting fees in null space and so on. So they can afford to pay more, which means builders sell for more, and ore miners sell for more. A year ago you could only do about 3/4 to half of what you are doing today, but you also payed less for other things, plex costed almost half of what it cost today. So of course the prices are higher. No s**h sherlock.
And as stated earlier, there is no freakin any risk in mining in 0.0 space. Most of these systems are either completely empty, or have mining ops backed-up by guards and intel. The only place with real risk is in WHs, where you can't have real intel or know what is coming, unless you are a serious paranoid person.
Too bad big alliance actaully get everything possibly done in high sec because any production in low/null is more trouble. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
148
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:59:00 -
[256] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:1st for the really beginner miner, a belt rat in 0.5 is problematic. An Osprey for example will ahve trouble dealing with a 0.5 belt rat.  The Osprey has plenty of room to fit a launcher and drones. Matters not. When I started 2 1/2 yrs ago, yes an Osprey had issues with the .5 rats. Sheesh. You just love pooh-poohing every statement made on the Forums.
Did you by any chance put up another tower? Goonwaffe is now recruiting feel free to message me in game for information about joining! |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
148
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:02:00 -
[257] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Tikera Tissant wrote:The big alliances have mining ops which mine everything, and not just ABC. And they use it to built a hell of a lot of things, not just T1 ships. Because of building spreas, some of them have to import ore from high-sec in order to keep up with the demand on building. This affect the ore price.
Why one high-sec mineral price jumps, is mainly because of what alliance is currently speed building and their region. Some regions, even with ABC ore, are completely short of iso for example, which causes that mineral to become in a very high demand.
This is the market and inflation. Its not ore imbalancing. People have more isk because of FW, doing incursions before the nerf (and after) and so on, renting fees in null space and so on. So they can afford to pay more, which means builders sell for more, and ore miners sell for more. A year ago you could only do about 3/4 to half of what you are doing today, but you also payed less for other things, plex costed almost half of what it cost today. So of course the prices are higher. No s**h sherlock.
And as stated earlier, there is no freakin any risk in mining in 0.0 space. Most of these systems are either completely empty, or have mining ops backed-up by guards and intel. The only place with real risk is in WHs, where you can't have real intel or know what is coming, unless you are a serious paranoid person. Too bad big alliance actaully get everything possibly done in high sec because any production in low/null is more trouble.
Someone finally gets it, I think I should go do a shot now.
Goonwaffe is now recruiting feel free to message me in game for information about joining! |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
32
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:05:00 -
[258] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:1st for the really beginner miner, a belt rat in 0.5 is problematic. An Osprey for example will ahve trouble dealing with a 0.5 belt rat.  The Osprey has plenty of room to fit a launcher and drones. Matters not. When I started 2 1/2 yrs ago, yes an Osprey had issues with the .5 rats. Sheesh. You just love pooh-poohing every statement made on the Forums. Did you by any chance put up another tower?
If you are talking about the light missile launcher you can fit, then it's sadly still terribad because the beginner miner would lack the support skill to make it efficient. Going like a true newbie, 0.6 is already hard to deal with. I personally ahd to warp out of belt often before filling the cargo hold. Thats a pure miner training with no support skill because miners who does not know better will only train toward mining.
La Nariz wrote:
Someone finally gets it, I think I should go do a shot now.
It was said 14 trillion time in the last 2 weeks iirc... |

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:09:00 -
[259] - Quote
And again mineral prices are not in essence affected by ppl in mining cruisers and below the lack of skills with the minimum M3 per hour is but a fraction of a drop in a bucket if you cant tank rats in HS you need to get into cahoots with a group that can support you and assist in your defence while mining and serisouly the time spent on training the crusier and support skill could have put you in a barge with enough drone/tank skills for them rats boys............ if not maybe WoW would be glad to have ya back since thinking isnt a big part of the game
\o/ |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
148
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:18:00 -
[260] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:La Nariz wrote:
Did you by any chance put up another tower?
If you are talking about the light missile launcher you can fit, then it's sadly still terribad because the beginner miner would lack the support skill to make it efficient. Going like a true newbie, 0.6 is already hard to deal with. I personally ahd to warp out of belt often before filling the cargo hold. Thats a pure miner training with no support skill because miners who does not know better will only train toward mining. La Nariz wrote:
Someone finally gets it, I think I should go do a shot now.
It was said 14 trillion time in the last 2 weeks iirc...
I'm not talking about missile launchers at all, I'm merely wondering if Krixtal "ragequit" Icefluxor put up another tower. Also just because we say something and corroborate it doesn't mean morons won't keep spouting the same wrong crap .
Goonwaffe is now recruiting feel free to message me in game for information about joining! |
|

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:19:00 -
[261] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:La Nariz wrote:
Did you by any chance put up another tower?
If you are talking about the light missile launcher you can fit, then it's sadly still terribad because the beginner miner would lack the support skill to make it efficient. Going like a true newbie, 0.6 is already hard to deal with. I personally ahd to warp out of belt often before filling the cargo hold. Thats a pure miner training with no support skill because miners who does not know better will only train toward mining. La Nariz wrote:
Someone finally gets it, I think I should go do a shot now.
It was said 14 trillion time in the last 2 weeks iirc... I'm not talking about missile launchers at all, I'm merely wondering if Krixtal "ragequit" Icefluxor put up another tower. Also just because we say something and corroborate it doesn't mean morons won't keep spouting the same wrong crap  .
my apologies i wasnt responding to your post but to the **hat above me
o/ |

Inquisitor Tyr
The Ostrogoths Curatores Veritatis Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:39:00 -
[262] - Quote
The issue at hand is Risk vs. Reward - and this is a system that needs to be monitored and adjusted by CCP as outcomes to their system that they don't forsee arise.
It's interesting to see that there are still people who believe the current mineral prices are completely driven by player activities and completely ignore the changes to the game that drove those changes. The players are reacting to a change CCP made to other systems, and due to the complexity of eve an unfortunate outcome has arisen. Its players that place the buy/sell orders but its CCP that creates the system that drives the players.
My contacts in empire mining corps have slowly turned into incursion runners. The point here being that many empire miners have turned to other activities. Incursions were quite the Isk Faucet for a time and that drew even the most avid miner into incursion fleets - and even after they made incursions less valuable those same miners are still at it.
If CCP set out to make empire mining more valuable; that was a success. In fact nullsec mining hasn't become any less valuable than it was 1.5 years ago - In my stats sheet I can see a price for Megacyte in Jita from 1.5 years ago was 1902 Isk. A couple of days ago it was 1937 Isk. There are fluctuations but its overall steady for the former high end minerals.
Again, this is about risk vs. reward - CCP changed the system and created a "vanilla" mining universe where all things are equally valuable.
Here is a relative value chart of ores based on current prices. The value is relative to the lowest valued ore. The numbers come from a break down of the mineral componenents of each ore type and are updated based on mineral values. I use this tool to tell me what to mine on a given day.
Take note that mining High End Scordite is just as valuable as Standard Arkonor.
Quote: 261.3%Veldspar 301.8%Scordite 293.8%Pyroxeres 299.7%Plagioclase 187.9%Omber 286.7%Kernite 298.5%Jaspet 301.2%Hemorphite 315.0%Hedbergite 116.6%Gneiss 216.4%Dark Ochre 100.0%Spodumain 230.5%Crockite 248.5%Bistot 339.8%Arkonor
Here is the same chart with prices from Pre-Incursion / Drone Nerf / T1 Loot revamp. The skew is towards the nullsec ores maintining a reasonable risk-reward scale.
Quote: 106.7%Veldspar 106.3%Scordite 137.7%Pyroxeres 100.0%Plagioclase 100.1%Omber 126.3%Kernite 186.9%Jaspet 209.5%Hemorphite 214.0%Hedbergite 122.2%Gneiss 190.7%Dark Ochre 108.2%Spodumain 251.8%Crockite 292.3%Bistot 382.4%Arkonor
|

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:51:00 -
[263] - Quote
then working as intended more risk in HS tehn null blue firewalls IMO i guess this can be closed now eh |

Inquisitor Tyr
The Ostrogoths Curatores Veritatis Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 22:56:00 -
[264] - Quote
Cap James Tkirk wrote:then working as intended more risk in HS tehn null blue firewalls IMO i guess this can be closed now eh
IGÇÖm not saying your opinion is incorrect, itGÇÖs just less correct than mine :P
But I can understand why your perspective is so myopic - no doubt, living in that wormhole your corp calls home gives you a valid perspective on whatGÇÖs going on in null and empire :P
Empire is safer: Concord - End of discussion.
What you are arguing is that nullsec is safer because the players work together. That is a testament to the players who live there and work together. They are doing eve right - Perhaps the miners in empire should follow suit and create intel channels. |

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:01:00 -
[265] - Quote
not myopic at all the market is a free player driven market now that tools that used to pump the market with mineral IE bots and drone goo are gone and HS miners can make a decent wage for how they want to play the game your throwing a tantrum because the overmined and over inflated market of High-end minerals has become a .01 isk game since null miners are trying to sell the wares they built up and do not want to be sitting on a stockpile of items that the value is decending........ since this is a open market and we the players are driving it why not take control instead of crying to CCP to fix what is not broken? |

Inquisitor Tyr
The Ostrogoths Curatores Veritatis Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:12:00 -
[266] - Quote
No one is throwing a tantrum - I am simply pointing out reasons why I find your perspective is incomplete and you are unable to counter it. Hence you are now attributing false traits to me in a desperate attempt to gain a foothold on the wall of overwhelming logic that you are now up against.
Quote:not myopic at all the market is a free player driven market now that tools that used to pump the market with mineral IE bots and drone goo are gone and HS miners can make a decent wage for how they want to play the game your throwing a tantrum because the overmined and over inflated market of High-end minerals has become a .01 isk game since null miners are trying to sell the wares they built up and do not want to be sitting on a stockpile of items that the value is descending........ since this is a open market and we the players are driving it why not take control instead of crying to CCP to fix what is not broken?
I find it hard to take a person who doesn't use a single period or comma in their entire paragraph seriously. Honestly, learn how to separate your thoughts and ideas because your post is just one long run-on sentence.
Anyways, you missed this:
Quote:It's interesting to see that there are still people who believe the current mineral prices are completely driven by player activities and completely ignore the changes to the game that drove those changes. The players are reacting to a change CCP made to other systems, and due to the complexity of eve an unfortunate outcome has arisen. Its players that place the buy/sell orders but its CCP that creates the system that drives the players.
|

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:14:00 -
[267] - Quote
and i give a fuq about proper grammar in a gaming world because?
and you point nothin out but an attempt to say my POV is myopic but where is the proofs so by you adding attributes to myself i only felt it fair to add tehm back no?
|

Inquisitor Tyr
The Ostrogoths Curatores Veritatis Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:30:00 -
[268] - Quote
Cap James Tkirk wrote:and i give a fuq about proper grammar in a gaming world because?
and you point nothin out but an attempt to say my POV is myopic but where is the proofs so by you adding attributes to myself i only felt it fair to add tehm back no?
You should "give a fuq" because you are here trying to convince people of your perspective. What you say and how you say it tells people things about you, such as your level of education, if you are intelligent and if you are thinking rationally. In other words, if people should listen to you and take you seriously.
You may change peoples minds if you are engaged in a meaningful discussion with a clear head rather than simply reacting to comments on an emotional level.
And don't try pretend you suddenly dont "give a fuq" when your actions, namely making multiple posts in this thread, show that you clearly do "give a fuq".
But at least you are trying(sort of), I'll give you that. |

Cap James Tkirk
The Nommo
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 23:36:00 -
[269] - Quote
let me correct you a bit i do not give a fuq about my punctuation on forums cause i dont i have to be very punctual for my work and ya know decided to leave work where its at...... the office
my level of education you say so if you had to surmise my education level where would you think it to be what do you think i do to make my living but due to my apprent lack of education and insinuaating all people of lesser intelligence must have SHITE jobs and lives to compliment that hmmm? becasue i dont give a fuq about proper grammar on a game forum
i guess with your special abilites you can tell all these things hmm?
maybe not also spectacular job turning this into an attack forum bet the folks are proud of you!!!!
****edit
Im not trying to make ppl form an opinion was just tossing out my 2 cents personally idc that null ores are less valuable makes me happy when i build and sell things |

celebro
Perpetuum Industries
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.04 07:17:00 -
[270] - Quote
Cap James Tkirk wrote: Im not trying to make ppl form an opinion was just tossing out my 2 cents personally idc that null ores are less valuable makes me happy when i build and sell things
I'm Just curious to know what has ore prices got to do with building and selling stuff?
I don't understand why people like to say, this is solely a player driven economy. It is only correct to say it is partly driven by players. The environment and game mechanics has still got a lot to do with prices, and that is controlled by CCP.
The ore imbalance is pretty obvious and the new mining changes are a way to counter it, these changes set as an example proves that the developers also change the economy, just wait a few months from now. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |