Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kusum Fawn
State War Academy Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 23:08:00 -
[151] - Quote
maybe its jsut me but i seem to have lost the arguement of this thread, CCP is to rebalance ores how? why is this even necessary? Why is the high price of trit an issue?
Isnt the market, player driven as it is, the cause of the ore price imbalance? the mining of nullsec (and wh now) ores and shipping to markets where the demand for them is less then the demand of low end ores found in all regions of eve? wasnt the previous imbalance caused by drone regions and mission loot reprocessing? err.. and botting to some extent? ~Goon hulkageddon had nothing to do with anything? the several month long slog to get a useable UI out of CCP (which is still not "good" but is "passable") seriously, why would running casual (hisec) miners out of the game have any effect on mineral prices?
isnt this still quite a bit premature to complain about a market force? the new mining ships should restore what you were complaining about in short order as miners come back in larger numbers because it can be done in class, after work and still make good isk. the large ore bays and much better tanks should fix this issue fairly shortly Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.
|

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
400
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 23:34:00 -
[152] - Quote
Why should they? Because the system for the game they set up is not acting like they set it up. Now people can keep going back and forth on "the market" but the fact is, the game is created so that ABCM ores are rarer, harder to get, and get you more isk per unit than Veldspar and Scordite. This is how the game was created. I'll go back to my first post, I didn't train for years to get into a hulk with T2 crystals, a rorqual alt and all the other things I need for null sec to earn less than those in high sec with perfect refining, no tax, and concord protection.
There are those that say "adapt" or "QQ" but here's an example of why I think CCP wants me to make more in null over highsec. Here is the description for Arkonor:
Quote:The rarest and most sought-after ore in the known universe. A sizable nugget of this can sweep anyone from rags to riches in no time. Arkonor has the largest amount of megacyte of any ore, and also contains some zydrine and tritanium. Here is Scordite:
Quote:Scordite is amongst the most common ore types in the known universe. It has a large portion of tritanium plus a fair bit of pyerite. Good choice for those starting their mining careers. So right now, Scordite, the ore for those starting out in their career is as good as the one that will sweep me from rags to riches in no time? Really?
That's my issue. And while people continue to harp up and down about "the market", the system we play in is not only controlled by the market. CCP probably has more of an effect on the market than anything else - right now is a case in point. With the removal of drone poo, new mining ships, and removing T1 drops, they completely upended the mineral market.
The replies to calls to balance ore usually fall within the following replies:
- Nullbears are mining too much and have tanked the market for high ends - blame yourself.
- The market determines prices, not CCP. Get a clue.
- There are huge cap losses in nullsec
- It's too soon.
On reply 1 - We have been hidden belts in null/wh's for years now. So I find little in that argument for why prices are out of whack. That seems to be coming from people that want to blame null miners for their own loss in profit while they reap the rewards of the new price structure in high sec.
On reply 2 - See above. CCP has far more control than a cursory reading of wikipedia's supply and demand article will help some understand. I never said EVE didn't have a market economy, it has a great one, it's just that it's a GAME and it is always going to be controlled by CCP. You can't go out and find new ores, you can't create new technologies, you can't create new ships, you can't find efficiencies that didn't exist before. Only CCP can do that and that "knowledge" is passed to us for everyone, not just the people who researched or innovated a new idea, to benefit.
Reply 3 - Perhaps, but we've had huge cap loses in the past and prices stayed relatively stable. It wasn't till the removal of drone poo that the prices went crazy.
Reply 4 - This is probably the only one that has any weight. It's possible that there are stockpiles out there still from drone poo that people still haven't used that need to be burned before we get to the real supply. Also, the new ships, while I don't think drastically change much, will have an effect that has yet to be fully measured.
So personally, yes, it might be a bit early and I bet CCP is probably still waiting it out because they have all the data. Changes to mining are mostly done? I'm not sure. But in 6 months we will know more. I for one am not anticipating much of a change to the prices and that's why I would like to see ore re-balancing as an option in the future. Not just an instant "no, it's markets" reply from those in high-sec that I know are having a great time with these prices. Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

Herr Hammer Draken
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 00:30:00 -
[153] - Quote
Wow do you ever come off sounding like a spoiled brat. CCP I want so give it to me. I am supposed to be king! Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet" |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
400
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 02:12:00 -
[154] - Quote
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Wow do you ever come off sounding like a spoiled brat. CCP I want so give it to me. I am supposed to be king! OK Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

Cinoke
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 03:40:00 -
[155] - Quote
I don't think hes being a brat... More risk generally = more reward... And he countered most points very well.. But I still think this is something that should wait.... people have been doing a lot of market vodoo with stockpiling stuff and I cant help but think that it is effecting things right now. |

Pipa Porto
883
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 04:33:00 -
[156] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:On reply 1 - We have been hidden belts in null/wh's for years now. So I find little in that argument for why prices are out of whack. That seems to be coming from people that want to blame null miners for their own loss in profit while they reap the rewards of the new price structure in high sec.
More people are doing it. It's not the individual that matters; collectively, people mining in Nullsec are producing more Nullsec ore than they used to. That leads to prices dropping. My guess is that this is because there has been an increase in the number of people mining in Nullsec (as opposed to an increase in the output of each person).
There is no "new price structure," there's just been a demographic change. Less (or the same) HS miners and More Nullsec miners. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
46
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 09:23:00 -
[157] - Quote
Cinoke wrote:I don't think hes being a brat... More risk generally = more reward... And he countered most points very well.. But I still think this is something that should wait.... people have been doing a lot of market vodoo with stockpiling stuff and I cant help but think that it is effecting things right now.
Note that I'm not asking CCP to bring things back to how they were 2 or 3 or even 4 years ago. That wasn't a golden age.
I'm complaining about a much more fundamental problem, which is that the market isn't as CCP intended it to be. The market is off-key to an extreme degree, relative to how CCP intended it to be. It's clear, as others have pointed out, from the ore text descriptions. CCP intended some types of ores to be run-of-the-mill and others to be small treasures, but they ****** up the BPO mineral values, and the only way to reduce the ore imbalance problem is to fix the BPOs, and doing so in a gradual fashion will be less disruptive than doing it abruptly.
Note that I don't mine in no-sec. I mine in high-sec. I'm not asking for ore balance for primary selfish reasons, but because this huge imbalance makes EVE a less good sandbox than it would otherwise be. I will admit that I sometimes scan for grav sites, though, so it does bother me in a direct and personal fashion that the ore types I find in grav sites aren't treasures but rather are worth less than the Scordite I can find in 0.9 belts.
Another possible fix, that does not involve changing existing BPOs, is to introduce alternative BPOs that require alternative mineral mixes. Specifically, ones that require less Pyerite and much less Tritanium, balanced out by requiring much larger amounts of medium-end minerals such as Isogen, Mexallon and Nocxium.
|

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
402
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 12:08:00 -
[158] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Zifrian wrote:On reply 1 - We have been hidden belts in null/wh's for years now. So I find little in that argument for why prices are out of whack. That seems to be coming from people that want to blame null miners for their own loss in profit while they reap the rewards of the new price structure in high sec. More people are doing it. It's not the individual that matters; collectively, people mining in Nullsec are producing more Nullsec ore than they used to. That leads to prices dropping. My guess is that this is because there has been an increase in the number of people mining in Nullsec (as opposed to an increase in the output of each person). There is no "new price structure," there's just been a demographic change. Less (or the same) HS miners and More Nullsec miners. I would agree with this if I saw prices slowly changing over time. However, we had a dramatic price shift all in the last few months. I'm not convinced that's due to more people mining in null/wh's because we would have seen this happen over several years. Additionally, if this were true, Arkonor would also be tanking in price but it's not. That to me is an indication that the refining values for the ores compared to their availability are not balanced in the way the game was created. Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

Pisov viet
Kaesong Kosmonauts Test Alliance Please Ignore
99
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 12:33:00 -
[159] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:The replies to calls to balance ore usually fall within the following replies:
- Nullbears are mining too much and have tanked the market for high ends - blame yourself.
- The market determines prices, not CCP. Get a clue.
. Except CCP do fix the relative prices, by controlling the bills of material of blueprints and the contents of ores.
Look at a rokh's requirement for tritanium and megacyte: 10 783 548 tritanium 3 029 megacyte.
Assuming you mine these from Veldspar and Arkonor (the best sources for trit and megacyte, respectively), you'll need 10 783 batches of 333 veldspar of 0.1m3 size, which is 359 074m3 to mine. 10 batches of 200 arkonor of 16m3 size, which is 32 000 m3 to mine.
The need for lowend ore in the production of a rokh is 11 time higher than that of highend ore. |

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
131
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 13:36:00 -
[160] - Quote
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Doddy wrote: All that you say is true, except of course that we are working within ccps parameters. They set the mineral values for ships and mods, not the players. Ccp added demand for low ends (capitals, supers), and continue to do so. If the next fotm class of ships they intoroduce are high end heavy that will adjust the balance (will need a lot to make up for caps though . Due to the rather dubious way ships are built demand has no real effect. Most ships use the same sort of ratios of each mineral so customer choice has little impact (this apoc made of trit is too expensive i will buy this geddon made of megacyte). And if you are going to get a cap ship you gonna pay for alot of low ends whatever.
I am also pretty sure i covered your other point with "colonisation of null sec"....
Ok but the only ships (cap) ships that require a lot of low end minerals are not built in high sec anyway. So why are all of those low end minerals over suppling high sec? That only makes them cheaper. The bulk should stay where the production of cap ships are. Now that does a few things it makes them scarce in high sec and hard to reach. And drives the price up. Unless they are way oversupplied at the cap ship source as well? Demand has a huge effect. If you are an industrialist demand plays a large role in your choice of shop locations. And not just for sales but for the entire supply chain including ores. Again I can see why CCP set the cap ships to use a lot of low end ores because they are made there. Ships that are made in high sec use mostly high sec ores. But I am still talking about ratios. 100,000 trit is used for every 1 megacyte in the high sec market. If you supply to that market 100,000 megacyte then in order to use it up we need 10,000,000,000 trit. That is where the demand comes in. Suppling enough high sec ores for the amount of low end. There is a mismatch right now in that way too many low ends are waiting to be used. Maybe a cap ship war will use them up?
What? I don't even ....
"Low end" ores are trit and pyr producing ones like veldspar and scordite. Cap ships use far more (about 40%) trit and pyr in relation to high end minerals than other t1 ships do, driving up the price of trit and pyr. All the easy logistic tools ccp have added to the game along with silly inconsistencies like mineral compression make moving low ends to lo sec and null very easy. Thus no one actually needs to mine low ends there and can spend their time mining the high ends. As 0.0 is now full of refineries and mining sites this leads to an over supply of high end minerals being shipped back to empire (in all those empty jump freighters) thus depressing the high end market.
|
|

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
131
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 13:49:00 -
[161] - Quote
double post |

Pipa Porto
884
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 14:14:00 -
[162] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Zifrian wrote:On reply 1 - We have been hidden belts in null/wh's for years now. So I find little in that argument for why prices are out of whack. That seems to be coming from people that want to blame null miners for their own loss in profit while they reap the rewards of the new price structure in high sec. More people are doing it. It's not the individual that matters; collectively, people mining in Nullsec are producing more Nullsec ore than they used to. That leads to prices dropping. My guess is that this is because there has been an increase in the number of people mining in Nullsec (as opposed to an increase in the output of each person). There is no "new price structure," there's just been a demographic change. Less (or the same) HS miners and More Nullsec miners. I would agree with this if I saw prices slowly changing over time. However, we had a dramatic price shift all in the last few months. I'm not convinced that's due to more people mining in null/wh's because we would have seen this happen over several years. Additionally, if this were true, Arkonor would also be tanking in price but it's not. That to me is an indication that the refining values for the ores compared to their availability are not balanced in the way the game was created.
The reason it didn't change over time is that, until this past spring, miners were not the primary producers of high end minerals, so demographic changes among them were masked.
Oh, and all the ores are available in effectively unlimited amounts. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Elinarien
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 18:46:00 -
[163] - Quote
So, given the current state of play, the answer is for the market to generate significant amounts of additional high-sec ores. That of course means more people mining in high-sec. Only way that demand is going to be satisfied and so prices fall.
However.. given this game's obsession with strangling the supply through hulkageddon etc I wouldn't bet on prices falling just yet. |

Pipa Porto
886
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 20:15:00 -
[164] - Quote
Elinarien wrote:So, given the current state of play, the answer is for the market to generate significant amounts of additional high-sec ores. That of course means more people mining in high-sec. Only way that demand is going to be satisfied and so prices fall.
However.. given this game's obsession with strangling the supply through hulkageddon etc I wouldn't bet on prices falling just yet.
You forgot about CCP's fixing the miners up with a new set of improved nappies. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
195
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 20:42:00 -
[165] - Quote
Elinarien wrote:So, given the current state of play, the answer is for the market to generate significant amounts of additional high-sec ores. That of course means more people mining in high-sec. Only way that demand is going to be satisfied and so prices fall.
However.. given this game's obsession with strangling the supply through hulkageddon etc I wouldn't bet on prices falling just yet. Hulkageddon was never that big of an issue to begin with, and with the Retriever and Mackinaw, smart miners will move to quiet, non station systems to mine "I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
|

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 01:11:00 -
[166] - Quote
Mortimer Civeri wrote:Elinarien wrote:So, given the current state of play, the answer is for the market to generate significant amounts of additional high-sec ores. That of course means more people mining in high-sec. Only way that demand is going to be satisfied and so prices fall.
However.. given this game's obsession with strangling the supply through hulkageddon etc I wouldn't bet on prices falling just yet. Hulkageddon was never that big of an issue to begin with, and with the Retriever and Mackinaw, smart miners will move to quiet, non station systems to mine
Stationless system only mean lower yield over time as you have more total hauling to do. You can find MANY quiet system with a station in them. Just use it as temporary storage is you have ****** standings untill you want to haul all back to market/refining station. |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 01:56:00 -
[167] - Quote
i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec and to try boosting the proffit from hi sec mining a lil drop the refining rate of hi sec ores by 10% |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 01:58:00 -
[168] - Quote
serras bang wrote:i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec
Scordite is worth more than both omber and Kernite. So is pyro and plag. You think people would go through the extra trouble of low sec for lesser profit? |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 01:59:00 -
[169] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec Scordite is worth more than both omber and Kernite. So is pyro and plag. You think people would go through the extra trouble of low sec for lesser profit?
you forget about what you get from refining omber and kernite |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:04:00 -
[170] - Quote
serras bang wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec Scordite is worth more than both omber and Kernite. So is pyro and plag. You think people would go through the extra trouble of low sec for lesser profit? you forget about what you get from refining omber and kernite
You mean the little isogen? Did you check the price of pyerite? The only thing beating scordite right now is Akronor and Mercoxit. Those 2 require operation in null sec with the already covered extra work required to mine it. The is a reason nobody mines in low sec and it's probably not gonna change anytime soon. |
|

serras bang
Lucien Coven
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:09:00 -
[171] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec Scordite is worth more than both omber and Kernite. So is pyro and plag. You think people would go through the extra trouble of low sec for lesser profit? you forget about what you get from refining omber and kernite You mean the little isogen? Did you check the price of pyerite? The only thing beating scordite right now is Akronor and Mercoxit. Those 2 require operation in null sec with the already covered extra work required to mine it. The is a reason nobody mines in low sec and it's probably not gonna change anytime soon.
unless something has changed that i aint quite aware of omber and kernit is the only 2 high sec ore that contain any isogen kernite is also the ore that holds the most of mex of any ore in the game. |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:11:00 -
[172] - Quote
serras bang wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec Scordite is worth more than both omber and Kernite. So is pyro and plag. You think people would go through the extra trouble of low sec for lesser profit? you forget about what you get from refining omber and kernite You mean the little isogen? Did you check the price of pyerite? The only thing beating scordite right now is Akronor and Mercoxit. Those 2 require operation in null sec with the already covered extra work required to mine it. The is a reason nobody mines in low sec and it's probably not gonna change anytime soon. unless something has changed that i aint quite aware of omber and kernit is the only 2 high sec ore that contain any isogen kernite is also the ore that holds the most of mex of any ore in the game.
And the price of those minerals are not high enough to compensate for the crazy big amount of pyerite you get from scordite. Until the price stabilise after the barge buff and the liquidation of already built up stock (who know how long that will take, you have to check market price for which ore to mine. Currently, in high sec, it's scordite. |

Herr Hammer Draken
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:03:00 -
[173] - Quote
It is my belief that CCP nerfed the drone poo because when they do the data dump every day at down time they found that players were generating more minerals from drone poo than they were from mining. That was not what they wanted from the game as miners were supposed to have a reason to exist and have a career. It is in the game plan for eve. They could determine the amount of minerals generated and used in construction on a daily basis in eve.
Once the source of minerals ended from drone poo then they had to be made up by miners. Now IMO it is the ratio of the null sec minerals compared to the high sec mineral that went askew after the drone poo removal. Perhaps not because of overmining of null ores. But because of under mining of high sec ores. Not enough was getting mined to meet the demand and therefore the excess null minerals began to pile up.
Human nature being what it is the majority of active miners want to mine that which makes the most money. Or mine ice. It was not considered cool to mine trit or scordite. You can see it here in this thread first hand. The op is of a mind that he will never stoop so low as to move to high sec to mine valuable ores. Because he is stuburn and wants the most valuable ores to be the ones he is mining because they are most expensive. Thus he should be rich. That is the basis of his argument. He will not go and mine that which currently pays well to mine. It is that easy but no will not do it.
Question how many others are of that same opinion? And how many are mining ice? How high does the value of mining trit and scordite have to go before miners decide to mine it enmass? And that is why the ratio is out of whack. I believe before the drone poo nerf more than 1/2 of these minerals came from drone poo and the miners have not yet made up that slack. I can tell because it is hard to find those minerals or enough of those minerals to build anything. So the cost goes up on them. I am slowed up in my construction because of lack of trit and pyrite. The rest I can get enough of or too much of. I am often mining my own trit and pyrite which slows down my construction to the speed at which I can mine.
Point is and I think CCP is also waiting for it, is for miners to take it upon themselves to mine enough of these ores to serve the market place. It is a sure bet that the op will never do this no matter high how trit goes. He will just complain about it louder and louder as the costs of trit and pyrite climbs. I can see the devs at CCP actually chuckling to themselves about the issue as they have the raw data on the daily data dumps.
Now to the point of the real issue. Because of the ratios of these ores and how they are used in construction, EVE needs 20 active high sec miners for every null sec miner to have a balanced amount of these ores on the market. I bet the real ratio is more like 8 to 1 in eve right now. We need to double the number of miners in high sec or 1/2 the number in null. The market price is suposed to convince miners to follow the money. But the op prefers to complain about it rather than move to where the money is. So how is CCP going to convince null sec miners to move to high sec? Just like CCP is going to convince high sec players to move to null right? We already see that players go where they think they belong because of preconcieved bias.
Let me bottom line it. You can not just mine the ore you want to and expect someone to pay you top dollar for it. That is not realistc. Just like a builder can not just build a crap ton of expensive stuff and dump it on the market and expect everyone to buy it all up. If the players stop buying it they stop and you sell at a loss. It works that way for the builders AND it works that way for the miner. You are not entitled to top dollar just because it is expensive ore you are mining. You only get to sell it for what the market is willing to pay for it. If you do not like it go find ore that is in demand. It is not that hard or difficult to do. But oh wait lets cry to CCP to fix it for us. Man ok set that precedent now then the builders get to complain and get CCP to protect their income as well. How stupid is this that we can even consider this as a valid complaint.
Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet" |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 12:33:00 -
[174] - Quote
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:It is my belief that CCP nerfed the drone poo because when they do the data dump every day at down time they found that players were generating more minerals from drone poo than they were from mining. That was not what they wanted from the game as miners were supposed to have a reason to exist and have a career. It is in the game plan for eve. They could determine the amount of minerals generated by mining and used in construction on a daily basis in eve.
Once the source of minerals ended from drone poo then they had to be made up by miners. Now IMO it is the ratio of the null sec minerals compared to the high sec mineral that went askew after the drone poo removal. Perhaps not because of overmining of null ores. But because of under mining of high sec ores. Not enough was getting mined to meet the demand and therefore the excess null minerals began to pile up.
Human nature being what it is the majority of active miners want to mine that which makes the most money. Or mine ice. It was not considered cool to mine trit or scordite. You can see it here in this thread first hand. The op is of a mind that he will never stoop so low as to move to high sec to mine valuable ores. Because he is stuburn and wants the most valuable ores to be the ones he is mining because they are most expensive. Thus he should be rich. That is the basis of his argument. He will not go and mine that which currently pays well to mine. It is that easy but no will not do it.
Question how many others are of that same opinion? And how many are mining ice? How high does the value of mining trit and scordite have to go before miners decide to mine it enmass? And that is why the ratio is out of whack. I believe before the drone poo nerf more than 1/2 of these minerals came from drone poo and the miners have not yet made up that slack. I can tell because it is hard to find those minerals or enough of those minerals to build anything. So the cost goes up on them. I am slowed up in my construction because of lack of trit and pyrite. The rest I can get enough of or too much of. I am often mining my own trit and pyrite which slows down my construction to the speed at which I can mine.
Point is and I think CCP is also waiting for it, is for miners to take it upon themselves to mine enough of these ores to serve the market place. It is a sure bet that the op will never do this no matter high how trit goes. He will just complain about it louder and louder as the costs of trit and pyrite climbs. I can see the devs at CCP actually chuckling to themselves about the issue as they have the raw data on the daily data dumps.
Now to the point of the real issue. Because of the ratios of these ores and how they are used in construction, EVE needs 20 active high sec miners for every null sec miner to have a balanced amount of these ores on the market. I bet the real ratio is more like 8 to 1 in eve right now. We need to double the number of miners in high sec or 1/2 the number in null to get to the right ratio. The market price is suposed to convince miners to follow the money. But the op prefers to complain about it rather than move to where the money is. So how is CCP going to convince null sec miners to move to high sec? Just like CCP is going to convince high sec players to move to null right? We already see that players go where they think they belong because of preconcieved bias.
Let me bottom line it. You can not just mine the ore you want to and expect someone to pay you top dollar for it. That is not realistc. Just like a builder can not just build a crap ton of expensive stuff and dump it on the market and expect everyone to buy it all up. If the players stop buying it they stop and you sell at a loss. It works that way for the builders AND it works that way for the miner. You are not entitled to top dollar just because it is expensive ore you are mining. You only get to sell it for what the market is willing to pay for it. If you do not like it go find ore that is in demand. It is not that hard or difficult to do. But oh wait lets cry to CCP to fix it for us. Man ok set that precedent now then the builders get to complain and get CCP to protect their income as well. How stupid is this that we can even consider this as a valid complaint.
i gotta say last time i mined as a test of my new ret my hourly income from mining had dropped to 15 mill or less. only a little while ago was i getting closer to 30 mill |

Celgar Thurn
Department 10
53
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 15:23:00 -
[175] - Quote
serras bang wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:i got an idea it would also get more miners into low sec when coupled with other ideas i got.
remove both omber and kernite from hi sec and place them in low sec Scordite is worth more than both omber and Kernite. So is pyro and plag. You think people would go through the extra trouble of low sec for lesser profit? you forget about what you get from refining omber and kernite You mean the little isogen? Did you check the price of pyerite? The only thing beating scordite right now is Akronor and Mercoxit. Those 2 require operation in null sec with the already covered extra work required to mine it. The is a reason nobody mines in low sec and it's probably not gonna change anytime soon. unless something has changed that i aint quite aware of omber and kernit is the only 2 high sec ore that contain any isogen kernite is also the ore that holds the most of mex of any ore in the game.
In terms of weight to return Plagioclase gives you more Mexallon than Kernite. The main use for Kernite is to complete level four storyline missions. Other than for that use it's way to heavy & slow to mine and haul so I would generally advise not mining Kernite.
Omber does have Isogen in it and I do mine that for Isogen though.  |

Celgar Thurn
Department 10
53
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 15:37:00 -
[176] - Quote
Herr Hammer Draken wrote: You only get to sell it for what the market is willing to pay for it.
You said it. And I totally agree with you. CCP wanted to make mining a viable career choice and atm it is just that. |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 15:44:00 -
[177] - Quote
Celgar Thurn wrote:i In terms of weight to return Plagioclase gives you more Mexallon than Kernite. The main use for Kernite is to complete level four storyline missions. Other than for that use it's way to heavy & slow to mine and haul so I would generally advise not mining Kernite. Omber does have Isogen in it and I do mine that for Isogen though. 
so whats your thought on that idea as far as both the market gose and trying to get people into low sec seing you obviosly do mine it and notice the impact it may have |

Frostys Virpio
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 17:07:00 -
[178] - Quote
serras bang wrote:Celgar Thurn wrote:i In terms of weight to return Plagioclase gives you more Mexallon than Kernite. The main use for Kernite is to complete level four storyline missions. Other than for that use it's way to heavy & slow to mine and haul so I would generally advise not mining Kernite. Omber does have Isogen in it and I do mine that for Isogen though.  so whats your thought on that idea as far as both the market gose and trying to get people into low sec seing you obviosly do mine it and notice the impact it may have
Still useless as long as the market currently hold as it is. Unless the price of Isogen start going up really high, moving omber and kernite to low sec will make no difference. |

Barakach
R-ISK Shadow Operations.
74
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 17:42:00 -
[179] - Quote
Revolution Rising wrote:
So is the same for ships, however I think you'll find that CCP considers blowing ships up an isk sink.
Nice going dumbass.
No, they consider it an ISK faucet, yay insurance.
ISK can ONLY be destroyed by NPCs. This is done via taxation, fees, services, or seeded items that can be purchased. |

serras bang
Lucien Coven
22
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 18:25:00 -
[180] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:serras bang wrote:Celgar Thurn wrote:i In terms of weight to return Plagioclase gives you more Mexallon than Kernite. The main use for Kernite is to complete level four storyline missions. Other than for that use it's way to heavy & slow to mine and haul so I would generally advise not mining Kernite. Omber does have Isogen in it and I do mine that for Isogen though.  so whats your thought on that idea as far as both the market gose and trying to get people into low sec seing you obviosly do mine it and notice the impact it may have Still useless as long as the market currently hold as it is. Unless the price of Isogen start going up really high, moving omber and kernite to low sec will make no difference.
but if you cant find isogen in hi cept from missions the price should infact start to rise. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |