Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Paikis
Lycosa Syndicate Surely You're Joking
181
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 21:19:00 -
[211] - Quote
So many people in here who just have no friggin clue about gas mining. |

Huttan Funaila
222 EVE 2 2 2
21
|
Posted - 2012.09.27 22:38:00 -
[212] - Quote
Paikis wrote:So many people in here who just have no friggin clue about gas mining. Totally. I've never come across a gas cloud before and never found a Ladar site when probing, so I have no clue what to expect. The web pages that say clouds explode might be talking about 1 particular gas type in one particular region. Or they all might explode. Or maybe none of them explode and the myth is there to keep the ignorant away. |

Furry Commander
Furry Armada
14
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 01:59:00 -
[213] - Quote
Ganthrithor wrote:Furry Commander wrote:
mining needs some love, this ship will simply require nonstandard tactics and fits to catch, its not toally uncatchable, you are more likely to catch this than a stealth bomber... you could volley it, smart bomb it, faction scram it, or bubble it, off the top of my head. and only one of those requires you to be in nulsec. is it so bad that a Noob in a noncombatant ship actually has a decent chance to dodge PVP when they aren't in the mood for it somplace other than Highsec?
Mining needs some love? Seriously? 2/10 bro, poor troll. (Hint: there was an exhumer buff) Also it's completely obvious that between the cloak and the frigate speed / agility this ship would have plenty of chances to "dodge pvp" without needing a WCS bonus.
yup mining need some love. the barges are better but this ship will be a hell of a lot more entertaining. this ship cannot kill anybody's conventional solo fit, unless something very strange happens, so the reverse being true is fair. at the same time it makes ninja mining way more viable. i could fit a bantam right now that flies almost identically to this ship. it would mine for **** with only one turret, but i could do it. this ship is just a super bantam. it can ninja and mine well at the same time which is perfectly fine since it isnt going to be able to do much else. why complain about a ship that makes mining almost as fun and risky as flying a stealth bomber? |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
427
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 06:20:00 -
[214] - Quote
What do you guys think about my idea for a new mod?
Remote harvesting link Description: a remote projection device that reduces the targets gas harvestor cycle time. Can only be fitted to the ORE frigate.
+ reduces harvestor cycle time by 10% + 5km optimal range + only one of these modules can be used on the target ship + uses mid slot
The key thing is that it creates a reason to mine in a group which would also be a nicer target for hunters. They see me trolling, they hating... |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
428
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 13:42:00 -
[215] - Quote
I guess no flaming is a good sign?! They see me trolling, they hating... |

Infinite Force
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
155
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:14:00 -
[216] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:What do you guys think about my idea for a new mod?
Remote harvesting link Description: a remote projection device that reduces the targets gas harvestor cycle time. Can only be fitted to the ORE frigate.
+ reduces harvestor cycle time by 10% + 5km optimal range + only one of these modules can be used on the target ship + uses mid slot
The key thing is that it creates a reason to mine in a group which would also be a nicer target for hunters. I like the idea of having a module to help with gas harvesting, but I wouldn't call it "remote" (e.g. remote armor rep, remote shield transfer, remote sensor booster) -- 'remote' items tend to be the 'help the other ship' types.
In regards to the people asking about "exploding" gas clouds - never seen one personally, and I've harvested all the Ladar site types in WH's. I haven't seen a Ladar site in High/Low/Null, so I can't comment on those. HROLT CEO Live Free; Die Proud
Hammer Mineral Compression - The only way to go! |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
429
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:21:00 -
[217] - Quote
Infinite Force wrote: I like the idea of having a module to help with gas harvesting, but I wouldn't call it "remote" (e.g. remote armor rep, remote shield transfer, remote sensor booster) -- 'remote' items tend to be the 'help the other ship' types.
Yeah that's the point. It's a remote module that boosts another ship meaning that the solo miner would get no bonus but if you and a friend went mining together, you could boost each other. They see me trolling, they hating... |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1011
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:37:00 -
[218] - Quote
The reason for only 2 turrets is to give the ship a utility high slot. 3 turrets would render all existing gas mining setups irrelevant, and that is not desirable. Remember, many players do not have gas harvesting trained to L5. For them this ship is clearly better.
This ship is better at gas mining than a cruiser. It holds more gas, it aligns faster, and it will be cheaper. "Better" does not have to mean "more gas per hour".
Cruisers and BCs used for gas mining still have an advantage for mining those clouds that produce damage. Thus the introduction of this frig does not render all current gas harvesters irrelevant, nor do current gas harvesters render this frig irrelevant.
The +2 WCS bonus: If CCP wanted to make that optional by allowing players to fit them or not as they please AND retain all other capabilities of the current ship they would have to:
Add 2 low slots, Increase the power grid and CPU to allow for fitting of 2 WCS, Increase the targeting range and targeting speed to compensate for the side effects of the WCS.
The resulting ship would be overpowered for a frig. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
620
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:11:00 -
[219] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:If CCP wanted to make that optional by allowing players to fit them or not as they please AND retain all other capabilities Why should you expect that? The whole point of stabs is that they're a trade-off between functionality and GTFO. As it stands this ship is already quite capable of escaping any random opponent with that insane align time. In fact, purely stock with no modules and skills, this thing has a faster align time than an Ares. In pyfa an Ares at 0 skills starts with an align time of 4.49s, going to 3.03s with all V skills. The ORE frigate will align faster than an interceptor. I would not at all be surprised if you could get it close to 2s after all is said and done.
This thing is already completely safe in low-sec unless you're pants-on-head ******** (or run into a smart-bombing camp) and it will probably be pretty damn slippery in null-sec as well. The +2 warp strength is completely unnecessary at that point. Give the ship an extra low slot so people can fit two stabs if they're willing to make a trade-off and remove the warp strength bonus. Nothing Found |

Catalina Cruz Madeveda
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:51:00 -
[220] - Quote
There's a lot of bitching and moaning in here over the +2 wcs on this ore frig. Quit being a bunch of sissies. Its already defensless. The better chance it has to get to hostile areas, the greater the chance of seeing more and more of these in hostile areas. That means more prey for us to hunt! but boo ******* hoo they will be too hard to catch.......waa waa waa lol grow a pair and learn to adapt.
ccp does something to encourage more indy pilots to go to hostile areas and people complain that its op and it means having to change fits just to catch them...... bunch of lazy people in this forum. |
|

Deornoth Drake
Cybermana
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 20:05:00 -
[221] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hello folks, This topic is about the ORE frigate coming out this winter. While its concept art can be seen in the Ship Balancing Summer Update blog and some speculation has already started, time has come to talk about it in details. Designed as an entry mining ship, it will replace the old 4 mining frigates in the Industry Career Path (the Tormentor, Bantam, Navitas and Burst). Compared to them, it has a much improved mining output, capacitor reliance and mobility, while having a decent 5000m3 ore hold. Its purpose is to be a fast hull capable of mining in hostile space (even if the current value of high-sec ores defeats this quite a bit, but that's another problem). It also serves as a gas harvester, a profession that was lacking love until now. With its +2 warp core strength bonus, it should stand a fair chance of doing its job in low-security space without being instantly tackled and killed. It also comes with a brand new skill, mining frigate, rank 2. Further down the drain we will change mining barge skill requirements to need mining frigate at 4, but not for winter - we'll most likely do that at the same time as the Destroyer and Battlecruiser skill changes to minimize training issues and complications. Again, since its the entry ship for mining, expect the market price to be low. Mining frigate skill bonuses:+5% to mining yield per level +5% to gas harvesting yield per level Role bonuses:+100% to mining yield +100% to gas harvesting yield + 2 warp core stabilizer bonus Slot layout: 3 H, 3 M, 1 L, 2 turrets Fittings: 45 PWG, 240 CPU Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 225 / 175 / 200 Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / average cap per second): 250 / 125s / 2 Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 335 / 3.6 / 1200000 / 4.04s Drones (bandwidth / bay): 10 / 10 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 15km / 750 / 5 Sensor strength: 4 Magnetometric Signature radius: 40 Cargo capacity: 50 Ore hold: 5000 Constructive comments are welcome  Could you elaborate for which usage you intended for the 3rd high slot? I would see cloak but still would be interested in your idea behind
|

Tanaka Aiko
ICE is Coming to EVE Goonswarm Federation
115
|
Posted - 2012.09.29 13:44:00 -
[222] - Quote
I'm a bit worried about the +2 warp strengh : it's something fast, and cheap. Moreover this ship won't have a sensor penality. meaning ; on low sec you don't have a real reason to bother chasing this cheap thing, which is already hard to catch. On null you have bubbles at least, but who will bother forming a fleet to catch a tech1 frigate ? And I wouldn't be surprised if people use this hull as a bait tackler : people won't be scared by seeing a mining frigate on scan, and when it'll appear on overview, and pve-ers will be catched easily, pointed while a real pvp ship warp here and finish the job, if the mining frigate takes to much damage it can warpout anytime with his warp bonus. Well this idea may not be a bad design, but I wonder. |

Komodo Askold
Legion of Darkwind Order of the Void
31
|
Posted - 2012.09.30 10:36:00 -
[223] - Quote
Finally, a ship made for gas harvesting! Thank you CCP!  |

Iq Cadaen
Cold Moon Destruction Talocan United
9
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 09:04:00 -
[224] - Quote
Arele wrote:WH gassers are going to love this. No.
If it had 110%+ yield at V with T2 harvesters compared to a 5x T2 harvester cruiser/BC then it would be an improvement. Right now it's just a waste of time. The ore/gas hold isn't really a selling point. |

Malken
The Kairos Syndicate Transmission Lost
49
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 10:02:00 -
[225] - Quote
with CCP giving away +wcs strength to new ships can i have a light dictor that can warp cloaked pls.
Gÿ+/ /Gûî / \
|

Iq Cadaen
Cold Moon Destruction Talocan United
9
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 10:13:00 -
[226] - Quote
Arele wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Terrenor h'qarr wrote:I don't understand the point of having a specialized ship if it's not going to out perform what we use today. IMO it needs an additional turret hardpoint to make it worthwhile. I know it's a frigate, and most people that harvest gas are using cruisers or BC's, but cmon man. You've already got 3 highs in there...just give it that third hardpoint and make everyone happy. Because it's /not/ a gas specialist. It's a replacement for the basic mining frigates. Which happens to also have a bonus to gas. ^^ Hey, someone actually gets it! This is a NEWBIE FOCUSED MINING FRIGATE, which also happens to have a gas bonus, so that once the newbies move on from this frigate into a barge (which doesn't take long at all), the ship won't be totally useless. How many newbies do you actually know that would drop 22 mill on a Gas Cloud Harvesting skill book? |
|

CCP Ytterbium
C C P C C P Alliance
1286

|
Posted - 2012.10.01 14:15:00 -
[227] - Quote
Hey folks, just quickly passing by to tell you the Gas Cloud Harvesting amount bonus on this ship has been swapped for a Gas Cloud Harvesting duration reduction to account for your comments on the skill progression that didn't scale well. It also makes the ship a bit more viable with fully trained skills, as it increases its output from 5 theoretical gas harvesters to 5.33. |
|

Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon
91
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 14:40:00 -
[228] - Quote
Name ideas:
Annexer, collector, securer, ransacker, recoverer, inheriter |

Savira Terrant
Valhollr
8
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 15:51:00 -
[229] - Quote
Please call it CHRIBBA !!1 |

Archare
SKEET ELITE Sk33t Fl33t
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 17:04:00 -
[230] - Quote
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:Name ideas:
Annexer, collector, securer, ransacker, recoverer, inheriter
How about the fracturer? or FRACKER for short!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fracking
|
|

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
437
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 18:10:00 -
[231] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hey folks, just quickly passing by to tell you the Gas Cloud Harvesting amount bonus on this ship has been swapped for a Gas Cloud Harvesting duration reduction to account for your comments on the skill progression that didn't scale well. It also makes the ship a bit more viable with fully trained skills, as it increases its output from 5 theoretical gas harvesters to 5.33.
5.3 is better than no bonuse I guess... Good work  They see me trolling, they hating... |

Infinite Force
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
155
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 19:02:00 -
[232] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hey folks, just quickly passing by to tell you the Gas Cloud Harvesting amount bonus on this ship has been swapped for a Gas Cloud Harvesting duration reduction to account for your comments on the skill progression that didn't scale well. It also makes the ship a bit more viable with fully trained skills, as it increases its output from 5 theoretical gas harvesters to 5.33. Can we get the OP to reflect this change, please? HROLT CEO Live Free; Die Proud
Hammer Mineral Compression - The only way to go! |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
311
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 19:16:00 -
[233] - Quote
Iq Cadaen wrote:Arele wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Terrenor h'qarr wrote:I don't understand the point of having a specialized ship if it's not going to out perform what we use today. IMO it needs an additional turret hardpoint to make it worthwhile. I know it's a frigate, and most people that harvest gas are using cruisers or BC's, but cmon man. You've already got 3 highs in there...just give it that third hardpoint and make everyone happy. Because it's /not/ a gas specialist. It's a replacement for the basic mining frigates. Which happens to also have a bonus to gas. ^^ Hey, someone actually gets it! This is a NEWBIE FOCUSED MINING FRIGATE, which also happens to have a gas bonus, so that once the newbies move on from this frigate into a barge (which doesn't take long at all), the ship won't be totally useless. How many newbies do you actually know that would drop 22 mill on a Gas Cloud Harvesting skill book? This ship isn't limited to gas harvesting. |

Furry Commander
Furry Armada
17
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 19:30:00 -
[234] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hey folks, just quickly passing by to tell you the Gas Cloud Harvesting amount bonus on this ship has been swapped for a Gas Cloud Harvesting duration reduction to account for your comments on the skill progression that didn't scale well. It also makes the ship a bit more viable with fully trained skills, as it increases its output from 5 theoretical gas harvesters to 5.33.
wanna give it a bonus to survey scanners as well?  |

JcJet
Pretenders Inc W-Space
70
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 22:26:00 -
[235] - Quote
A ship with 3 hardpoints on the model but 2 in the info is ugly. BLAH.
Don't be so cheap, it's a noobie miner anyway. Or make it withh 3 turrets but reduce the bonus. Or at least add 1 missile hardpoint, so it'll not be so ugly with an empty hardpoint. |

Furry Commander
Furry Armada
17
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 22:49:00 -
[236] - Quote
JcJet wrote:A ship with 3 hardpoints on the model but 2 in the info is ugly. BLAH.
Don't be so cheap, it's a noobie miner anyway. Or make it withh 3 turrets but reduce the bonus. Or at least add 1 missile hardpoint, so it'll not be so ugly with an empty hardpoint. last turret is probably for tractor or salvager, jetcanning can still happen even with 5k M3 ore hold, that or salvaging loot from highsec rats
|

Alx Warlord
Security Task Force
170
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 22:50:00 -
[237] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hello folks, Constructive comments are welcome 
CCP Ytterbium,
This is the perfect time to change how the gas harvesting skill works.
thx. [Discussion] - New POS system ( Construction Block Built - Starbasecraft) <<< Please CCP read this! |

Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
49
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 02:45:00 -
[238] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:And yes, folks, despite its name, gas is automatically harvested into the Ore hold. Wanted to file a bug report to CCP Tuxford in case it didn't, but he was quite clever and implemented that ahead of time during the mining barge changes  Clever girl.
If this frigate becomes EVE's best gas-sucking ship, then where is the worthwhileness of training the Gas Mining skill above 2? Lots of players have already trained it to 4 or even 5, and if you don't give them a gas mining ship that allows them to utilize that high skill, they're going to be upset.
I'd also like to hear about the rounding down issue with regards to gas amounts. Will it actually work as intended, with the full +150% bonus, or will it round down and screw us?
|

Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
49
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 02:54:00 -
[239] - Quote
Tanaka Aiko wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Doddy wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:
- The bonuses multiply, thus its 2*1.25 = 2.5 boost at level 5. Thus the 2 bonused gas harvesters become 5.
- The ship was play tested in low-security gas sites - it's not necessarily made to tank null-security sites as it is an entry level hull.
- As said in the OP, industry tutorials should be changed to give this frigate instead of the old ones.
Bonus needs to be bigger so its not pointless training ore frig 5 to do the job a destroyer or cruiser can do at level 1. 10% instead of 5% would do it, the damage tanking is fine, even in null there are sites that do no damage and it seems reasonable that someone would need a cruiser hull stank for the big sites. cool did not know destroyers had cargo hold of 5k gas takes very little space you know
Level 4 gas mining missions require you to haul home a bit over 4000 m3. That's 4k m3. That's a lot of space, given that Barges and Exhumers can't be used for those missions, since they can't fit Gas Miner modules.
|

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
650
|
Posted - 2012.10.02 03:41:00 -
[240] - Quote
Salpad wrote:If this frigate becomes EVE's best gas-sucking ship, then where is the worthwhileness of training the Gas Mining skill above 2? Lots of players have already trained it to 4 or even 5, and if you don't give them a gas mining ship that allows them to utilize that high skill, they're going to be upset.
I'd also like to hear about the rounding down issue with regards to gas amounts. Will it actually work as intended, with the full +150% bonus, or will it round down and screw us? You might want to actually read the whole thread; unlike a lot of them in this forum this one is short. Nothing Found |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |