Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Whisperen
That's Not A Knife Flatline.
14
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 15:03:00 -
[271] - Quote
So how is this going to stand up vs the new ai and why do you intend to give everybody free stabbed instalock tackle?
Im sure hundreds of people are going to come play at your new themepark every month . |

Martin0
Maximum-Overload
80
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:54:00 -
[272] - Quote
Doddy wrote:How long are noobie miners gonna stay in game when they are permajammed by guristas in thier sensor strngth 4 frigs (at least in cal space). That is almost half that of the bantam so nearly twice as much jamming.
They will skill drones II and scout drone operation I (total train time <2 hours) and deploy those 2 drones to kill the rats. you can do it with the bantam too, if you bother to kill that stupid jammer rat with you drone. And don't say "drones for caldari are useless" every ship bigger than a frigate use drones. |

Dersen Lowery
Knavery Inc. StructureDamage
125
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 17:08:00 -
[273] - Quote
Maevelynne Aihaken wrote:The more I look at this thing and read up on everyone elses comments the more I think that the ship would serve alot better as a destroyer hull instead of a frigate.
Blasphemy! It is only proper that any ORE destroyer be a salvaging boat. ;-) |

Savira Terrant
Valhollr
11
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 11:32:00 -
[274] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:Maevelynne Aihaken wrote:The more I look at this thing and read up on everyone elses comments the more I think that the ship would serve alot better as a destroyer hull instead of a frigate. Blasphemy! It is only proper that any ORE destroyer be a salvaging boat. ;-)
Wait. Don't we have a salvaging boat already? But good point. Why is it not destroyer class?!  |

Aedeal
Bangarang Inc
29
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 06:44:00 -
[275] - Quote
Has the gas yield per lvl been changed to cycle time yet? Cos it really should be. |

Furry Commander
Furry Armada
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.14 18:24:00 -
[276] - Quote
Aedeal wrote:Has the gas yield per lvl been changed to cycle time yet? Cos it really should be.
yes, but they havent updated the OP |

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
292
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 13:16:00 -
[277] - Quote
Martin0 wrote:Doddy wrote:How long are noobie miners gonna stay in game when they are permajammed by guristas in thier sensor strngth 4 frigs (at least in cal space). That is almost half that of the bantam so nearly twice as much jamming. They will skill drones II and scout drone operation I (total train time <2 hours) and deploy those 2 drones to kill the rats. you can do it with the bantam too, if you bother to kill that stupid jammer rat with you drone. And don't say "drones for caldari are useless" every ship bigger than a frigate use drones.
I wasn't really serious about it being an issue, i just don't see why they gave its such a low sensor strngth in comparison to current mining frigs. Also given drone aggro mechanics and the upcoming rat aggro mechanic changes its perfectly possible for your drones not to engage the rats for ages, then be killed by one of the rats.
Poor noobie miner :( |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
700
|
Posted - 2012.10.20 10:24:00 -
[278] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote: It seems almost like this is based on the idea that by making mining frigates harder to catch and kill, it will encourage 0.0 mining.
Which I guess might possibly be true if 0.0 mining wasn't so worthless and boring, though it still misses the fundamental point - the biggest benefit to encouraging 0.0 industry is that it restores the first link in the food chain, that of vulnerable, tempting targets for solo-ers and small gang-ers to catch and kill, and that auto-stabbed frigate hulls don't particularly fit in the 'vulnerable targets' description.
New mining ships will NEVER be able to change the poor state of the bottom end of null's industry and the lack of 'soft' targets. Because this problem is truly caused by the extremely low-cost, low-risk, low-effort of importing everything simply from empire since the introduction of Jump Freighters. For as much as null likes to look down on empire, they are still addicted to its convenience.
Tess La'Coil wrote:I'd figure the sole purpose of the +2 warp strength is to be able to enter lowsec and make travelling gate to gate a bit safer.
Basically to make sure the "newbie" doesn't make his first entry (probably for a tutorial mission) into lowsec, gets cracked tackled 'n popped right on the first gate and decides lowsec isn't worth it.
Isn't that the same reason it's on the Deep Space Transports? They've got HP to take the blows while they align, and the +2 to make them viable ships to run around lowsec. And in some remote past what the Skiff was partly meant for?
Obviously it has no use in null as you've got bubbleboys there. But for lowsec I see its uses for industrialists. Lowsec duders just adapt fitting more scrams and SeBo's.
WCS won't help for most gate camps. They do help for ninja-mining in low-sec though.
Sorxus wrote:So, if person will decide to use this frigate with two gas harvesters, then whats the point training gas harvesting skill to level 5? Large ore hold is nice, but still not enough, you will have to eject your gas and haul with industrial ship or similar ways. Same gas harvesting efficiency as battlecruiser with 5 gas harvesters. Good job at creating another "echelon" (good for nothing). I will stick to battlecruiser, have decent tank, drone bay and be able to bait with my gas harvesting ship :)
Think about it, why should i train another new skill for it, if i can get same efficiency with any other ship already?
It's meant as a low-level mining frigate, not your desired end-game WH gas miner.
---
I'd love to see a 20m3 drone bay in for this ship. Giving it the option to have both a flight of mining drones (because they are cute) and a flight of light scouts to deal with minor belt rats.
Personally I do NOT like the +2 WCS. Rather give the ship more lowslots, so players can choose for themselves how to fit it. Either with WCS for low-sec, nanos for null and WH to combine with a cloak, or a modest tank against belt rats.
Besides, the whole in-built WCS, and WCS in general need a good thorough revision, taking in account the current uselessness of WCS in combat (balancing went from 'too good' all the way to 'horrible'), the dominant use of bubbles over scramblers in null and WH, the uselessness of the DST, etc.
Adding just another new ship to the To-Do list of balancing is not smart. Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt
Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |

M1k3y Koontz
Blackened Skies Nulli Secunda
53
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 13:09:00 -
[279] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
- The ship was play tested in low-security gas sites - it's not necessarily made to tank null-security sites as it is an entry level hull.
/Puts the gas harvesters back on his Hurricane 
How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Scuzzy Logic
Space Spuds STR8NGE BREW
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.21 19:15:00 -
[280] - Quote
Buzzy Warstl wrote:It occurs to me that the gas mining bonus shows a need to adjust what the gas mining skill does.
I don't have any specific suggestion, but unless a barge-class gas miner is in planning there will be no reason for anyone to train gas mining past level 2.
You do know you need gas harvester IIs to be able to survive the bigger gas explosions, right? GH Is force you too close for a frig to survive the blast.
I'm loving the ''spare'' high for a probe launcher to make solo gas mining into something other than a docking game. |
|

PhatController
Mum Rider Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.22 22:15:00 -
[281] - Quote
So these will be replacing both the mining frigates and cruisers? I assume that means new miners will progress straight from this ORE frigate onto mining barges? |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
1151
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 01:08:00 -
[282] - Quote
PhatController wrote:So these will be replacing both the mining frigates and cruisers? I assume that means new miners will progress straight from this ORE frigate onto mining barges?
Yes. That seems to be the master plan since no ORE cruiser has been announced. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
449
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 09:29:00 -
[283] - Quote
Well here's to hoping that they announce an ORE cruiser that is just a beefed up version of the frigate (e.g. able to tank all gas sites) and then after that, ORE should release a T3 industrial cruiser  They see me trolling, they hating... |

Spurty
V0LTA Verge of Collapse
524
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 14:25:00 -
[284] - Quote
Did someone forget to 'name' this ship?
ORE frigate is its job.
Surely you can dream up some name for it (You named the Space coat-hanger, 'Apotheosis' after all) ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Darak Tar
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 15:57:00 -
[285] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Well here's to hoping that they announce an ORE cruiser that is just a beefed up version of the frigate (e.g. able to tank all gas sites) and then after that, ORE should release a T3 industrial cruiser 
have to say I love this idea though I believe the current idea is that you go from Ore frigate to barge.
though it does make total sense that ORE are on the cutting edge of industrial technology and as such should come up with some way to leverage the new gas and resources found in the depths of WH space! |

Xindi Kraid
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
30
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 18:28:00 -
[286] - Quote
Scrapyard Bob wrote:PhatController wrote:So these will be replacing both the mining frigates and cruisers? I assume that means new miners will progress straight from this ORE frigate onto mining barges? Yes. That seems to be the master plan since no ORE cruiser has been announced. Well, if you think about it, Mining barges ARE ORE cruisers. They are classified as medium ships (like combat cruisers and battlecruisers) and were in the cruiser column of CCPs ship chart.
So the real question is: Will CCP ever make ORE destroyer, battlecruiser or battleship sized ships? |

Aglais
Liberation Army BricK sQuAD.
134
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 18:38:00 -
[287] - Quote
I'll admit right off the bat here that mining and industry are not my strong areas in EVE, so don't take anything I suggest too seriously.
I don't personally see why there need to be destroyer or battlecruiser sized ORE ships. You have to keep in mind that they have wholly different functions compared to combat ships. These ships usually have some sort of benefit by being larger than one class yet smaller than another, as in battlecruisers (hardened cruisers with additional weaponry that remain more mobile than battleships at the cost of sheer damagedealing potential).
And ORE 'destroyer' doesn't make very much sense to me. Really, what makes sense is ORE ships having a small -> medium -> large -> capital progression of sorts, with each size class having some unique traits over the others. Such as the ORE frigate(s) being very mobile with alot of potential for just what it is that they're capable of mining (dedicated ice, ore and gas mining frigates as well as a generalist, all built around mobility rather than survivability), the 'cruisers' as you say, or rather medium hulls, being the barges and exhumers we are familiar with that have other roles not occupied by frigates, and then the large ORE ships might perhaps be focused primarily on being large defensive powerhouses that could act as mobile mining logistics platforms, with bonuses that may be somewhat like an industrial capital but less powerful. Whereas the ORE capitals would more or less be the heart of a large mining operation, great team bonus capabilities, etc.
|

Zyella Stormborn
Alpha Strategy In Umbra Mortis
156
|
Posted - 2012.10.23 18:39:00 -
[288] - Quote
I don't see any real need or fit for ORE destroyer or bc, but I have to admit, I think a BS class ORE ship would be great. Needed? probably not. But the idea of a Battle Ship class exhumer that could go out solo into deeper space and hold its own solo op with enough ore hold to be out for a while is a great concept.
Almost like a Rorq / Exhumer mix of some form, that does not do either job quite as well, but is capable of doing both in a limited fashion (ex: You can compress ores you mine, as you mine them, but are not able to compress other ore that is put into the bay from other ships / already present. It is part of the actual mining process of the ship. This would prevent it from taking the Rorq's role, yet still allow it to hold much more in its ore bay than others might. Only allow the ship in low or 0.0 space still, to prevent high sec compression. Just a concept idea).
So many other things in game to fix / balance which should take priority though. ;P
~Z |

Xindi Kraid
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
30
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 02:53:00 -
[289] - Quote
Note: my comment isn't suggesting CCP will or should make other classes of ORE ships (I suspect they aren't)
That said, despite not being a miner, I love the idea of a battleship sized mining vessel that outputs compressed ore. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
449
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 09:16:00 -
[290] - Quote
What are you guys talking about? You want a mining barge that is bigger and even slower than a Hulk? That sounds like the worst. 
We have (or will have) the ORE frig, the noctice, T1 and T2 barges, T1 and T2 haulers and capital industrial. The missing ship is the T3 industrial cruiser. They see me trolling, they hating... |
|

Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy
226
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 11:21:00 -
[291] - Quote
Ore battlecruiser? I think thats the Orca you are thinking about. And battleship not so much but you have the Ore capital Rorqual, so it's unlikely for you to REALLY need anything else... It would likely just obsolete too much in a go
What you WANT ofcourse is another thing  |

Jason13 Anzomi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 00:00:00 -
[292] - Quote
I'm reading posts from old players who are talking as if they're planning on trading in high level ships in order to use this entry level mining frigate. Listen people, this is not a gas mining ship for a 20m SP pilot to fly.
I'm also reading posts from old players who are talking as if it will prevent them from killing new miners when they invade low/null space. Listen people, newbies will die if they go into low/null sec. They simply do not have the techniques down to be able to avoid dying. By the time they figure out which button to click on, you'll have them locked and dead.
Any older alt trying to use this ship to invade low/null sec is going to get laughed at. Any new player who manages to avoid gate campers with this ship should be immediately signed up by your PvP corp!
It is a great step up for new miners just getting started. A paper thin frigate good for (very!) high sector, but will pop immediately if a couple of rats show up.
Keep things in perspective. This is a newbie level ship, not a high level ship for a 20m SP pilot. |

Vorlasha
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 04:59:00 -
[293] - Quote
Pinky Denmark wrote:Ore battlecruiser? I think thats the Orca you are thinking about. And battleship not so much but you have the Ore capital Rorqual, so it's unlikely for you to REALLY need anything else... It would likely just obsolete too much in a go What you WANT ofcourse is another thing 
The Orca is actually a capital ship, and it about the size of a battleship in space.
It's hard to come up with a viable large scale version of a hulk that doesn't overpower the yield. Currently there just isn't a job that isn't currently occupied by a ship.
You could argue that a mid-sized freighter might be beneficial.
But the moment you go above 3 strips and an 8500 m/3 ore hold, you start to get into silly numbers for dedicated miners.
TLDR: We don't have enough jobs atm to necessitate a BC/BS/T3 hull. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
449
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 08:53:00 -
[294] - Quote
Vorlasha wrote: TLDR: We don't have enough jobs atm to necessitate a BC/BS/T3 hull.
Not true. There are plenty of industrial roles to fill:
1. A high level gas mining ship 2. Hacking and analysing ship 3. A mining command ship, that isn't the size of an orca, with bonuses to gang links 4. A mining ship that a warped cloaked
The list goes on... They see me trolling, they hating... |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
952
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 14:36:00 -
[295] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:And yes, folks, despite its name, gas is automatically harvested into the Ore hold. Wanted to file a bug report to CCP Tuxford in case it didn't, but he was quite clever and implemented that ahead of time during the mining barge changes  Clever girl.
So is the Orca Ore Hold going to take Gas Cloud Material now if the Ore Hold in the new Frigate does ? |

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION
230
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 14:42:00 -
[296] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Vorlasha wrote: TLDR: We don't have enough jobs atm to necessitate a BC/BS/T3 hull.
Not true. There are plenty of industrial roles to fill: 1. A high level gas mining ship 2. Hacking and analysing ship 3. A mining command ship, that isn't the size of an orca, with bonuses to gang links 4. A mining ship that can warp cloaked The list goes on...
1) Agreed. 2) We are getting exploration frigates and possibly T2 versions of them in the future 3) Use a command ship 4) God no. Not required. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
452
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 14:55:00 -
[297] - Quote
Spugg Galdon wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Vorlasha wrote: TLDR: We don't have enough jobs atm to necessitate a BC/BS/T3 hull.
Not true. There are plenty of industrial roles to fill: 1. A high level gas mining ship 2. Hacking and analysing ship 3. A mining command ship, that isn't the size of an orca, with bonuses to gang links 4. A mining ship that can warp cloaked The list goes on... 1) Agreed. 2) We are getting exploration frigates and possibly T2 versions of them in the future 3) Use a command ship 4) God no. Not required.
1) ... 2) No confirmation of a T2 version, it's a crappy T1 frig as far as i'm aware and you can fit a dedicated T1 cruiser to do the job better 3) There's a cruiser/BC class command ship with mining bonuses? No? Then why post? 4) I'm sure when T3 cruisers came out people where up in arms about them being able to cloak. Thankfully CCP didn't listen and as a result, t3 are awesome. Industrialists need new toys to. They see me trolling, they hating... |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
212
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 18:05:00 -
[298] - Quote
Sylvilagus Palustris wrote:Shouldn't the gas harvesting yield bonus be a time bonus?
edit for clarity:
gas is 10 m3
yield per cycle is 10 m3 (doubled)
adding 25% will result in no extra gas since in rounds down.
Bonus should be a reduction on cycle time (like ice miners) ^^This is exactly what I was thinking. If the 5% per level mining bonus affects the gas harveters. It would be fine if it was 20m3 plus 25% which would give you 25m3 per cycle. But gas is like ice in that one unit is 10m3. So like ice a 25% bonus would be pointless as it would give you 2.5 units at level 5 which would round down to 2 units completely nullifying the bonus.
Also if this is meant to be the dedicated gas miner to replace using a Battle Cruiser, Should not the skill also be changed? A ship designed to fill the hole of a missing gas mining industrial ship should match up with the skill needed to use gas harvesters. This ship would have no benefit to training the gas mining skill past 2 as it can only use two gas harvesters. While the skill grants the use of an additional gas harvester per level to a maximum of 5.
I understand the concerns with possibly having a frigate with 5 turret slots. That just would not work unless those slots could equip nothing but mining lasers or gas miners. Maybe drop the gas mining yield bonus, give it 3 utility high slots, and remove the turret hard point requirement from the gas harvesters. It could still only hold 2 mining lasers but could then hold 5 gas harvesters. Leave or increase the gas harvester cycle time bonus, and it would out mine any other ship equipped with 5 gas miners. Vola the best gas miner in game, still benefiting from having gas mining trained to level 5.
Or if it had the gas mining yield bonus at 25% per level, it would still be pointless until you get it to 5, which makes it equal to 5 gas miners plus the cycle bonus. Only a slight yield improvement over using a Cane, aside from the ore hold. It just seems out of place to then have the gas mining skill add an additional gas harvester per level . As far as a noob ore mining ship with two bonused mining lasers it seems perfect.
Aside from that It looks great, cudos to the art department, and it will fill the spot of the noob mining frigate very well. But as it stands now, it will not out perform a BC with 5 gas miners and so will not become the new gas mining ship. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
746
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 18:16:00 -
[299] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: It would be fine if it was 20m3 plus 25% which would give you 25m3 per cycle. But gas is like ice in that one unit is 10m3. So like ice a 25% bonus would be pointless as it would give you 2.5 units at level 5 which would round down to 2 units completely nullifying the bonus.
Already updated to a cycle time bonus.
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Also if this is meant to be the dedicated gas miner to replace using a Battle Cruiser, Should not the skill also be changed? A ship designed to fill the hole of a missing gas mining industrial ship should match up with the skill needed to use gas harvesters. This ship would have no benefit to training the gas mining skill past 2 as it can only use two gas harvesters. While the skill grants the use of an additional gas harvester per level to a maximum of 5.
It's an entry level mining frigate that also happens to be a gas miner.
And a reason to train it to 5 still, is the t2 harvesters. Which double your yield.
FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |

Ginger Achura
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 03:11:00 -
[300] - Quote
Looking forward to this ship. It's great to be able to fly a mining frigate with an actual ore hold (5000 vs a couple of hundred on the existing mining frigates) for those of us who are not full-time miners. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |