| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 20:03:00 -
[151] - Quote
edited |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
282
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 04:36:00 -
[152] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote: You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec.
False. You have access to the player-controlled market even in highsec. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
295
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 13:37:00 -
[153] - Quote
Maxpie wrote:Whenever I explain Eve to my friends who have played other games, I always tell them "you probably won't like it, this game is not for everybody" and unfortunately, most of the time it is true. That said, I can't play any of their boring, meaningless theme park games.
It took me 3 trials to finally subscribe. Being able to pay with PLEX is what made it attractive down the line. Although my income started paying for them when I moved out of highsec, I doubt the people in high who pay with PLEX like it when proposed changes nerf their income as their "regular playstyle" won't afford the monthly fee. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
221
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 13:54:00 -
[154] - Quote
Damsel in Distress wrote:I am forced to live in highsec because carebears keep screwing the risk/reward to their direction an no nullsec corp wants me and without an alliance, highsec is way more profitable as a newb.
I hate how their forcing there playstyle onto me.
CCP please stop the high sec zealots.
That entire post made my eyes bleed. |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:52:00 -
[155] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Dar Manic wrote: You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec.
False. You have access to the player-controlled market even in highsec.
Wat? You just left the earth's orbit with that tid bit.
If shooting and blowing up peeps (and/or having them do it to you) is not your thing then go to Hi-sec... hrm, not sure where the market has anything to do with it.
I see the 'player-controlled' bit which means you are part of the panic'd 'miners are ruining the game and it's communism' crowd. I'm not talking about anything to do with markets... simply talking about shooting ships and blowing up. Adapt or die... I love it when people using that phrase are loudly advocating great changes in the game!-á It's not adapting if you are crying for change, it's called whining.-á :) |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5002
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:54:00 -
[156] - Quote
The market is most definitely a PvP arena. Not all PvP is shooting at things. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |

Lord Zim
1900
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 14:54:00 -
[157] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:If shooting and blowing up peeps (and/or having them do it to you) is not your thing then go to Hi-sec... hrm, not sure where the market has anything to do with it. Market is still PVP. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
299
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 04:49:00 -
[158] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:Dar Manic wrote: You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec.
False. You have access to the player-controlled market even in highsec. Wat? You just left the earth's orbit with that tid bit. If shooting and blowing up peeps (and/or having them do it to you) is not your thing then go to Hi-sec... hrm, not sure where the market has anything to do with it. I see the 'player-controlled' bit which means you are part of the panic'd 'miners are ruining the game and it's communism' crowd. I'm not talking about anything to do with markets... simply talking about shooting ships and blowing up.
In a game where every action you take (i.e. partake in market transactions) affects other people, the only way to stop "PVPing" is by not playing the game.
One player trained to excel at seeding the market (mining), the competition trained shooting guns. Who is the winner is a matter of perspective, as the ammo/modules/ships used could have been seeded by the very person you just shot down.
I could reply to your snide comment about me being part of a specific "crowd" you obviously look down upon that you appear to be part of the willingly oblivious crowd slash uneducated... but I won't. |

Terminal Insanity
Suicides-R-Us BricK sQuAD.
687
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 10:13:00 -
[159] - Quote
Im headed to the Hello Kitty Online forums to complain that they're forcing me into a carebear playstyle. I cant even PVP there, what the ****? All i want to do is rip some kittie's heads off and they're trying to force me to hop around and act all polite and ****. They're ruining the game for me. "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP |

NARDAC
Newb U
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 11:43:00 -
[160] - Quote
bottom line:
CCP is a business that exists to make money, and that is based on the number of paid subscriptions.
ANY play style that reduces the number of paid subscriptions is going to get nerfed.
Whine, vent, lament, complain.... try to force players to play the game in a way they do not enjoy, they will quit the game, and CCP will respond.
You may think that those players quitting is a good thing. I am 100% sure that CCP does not feel the same way. |

NARDAC
Newb U
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 11:57:00 -
[161] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote: We don't need more PVE content in nullsec. We need more incentives to PVP.
The vast majority of people in high sec fit into two categories: 1) those with no interest in PVP and will not PVP regardless of the incentives offered. 2) Poeple that already PVP, but are in high sec grinding some ISK to buy new ships to lose in PVP.
I read your post on "fixing local". My response is, why do you want to force more people out of low/null and into high sec?
Risk/reward: anything that makes it easier for you to kill someone will result in fewer people doing it.
Anytime you have an idea that starts with "It will make it easier for me to kill them while they....", realize that what you are saying is "I want to stop people from doing...". |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
478
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 11:58:00 -
[162] - Quote
NARDAC wrote:bottom line:
CCP is a business that exists to make money, and that is based on the number of paid subscriptions.
ANY play style that reduces the number of paid subscriptions is going to get nerfed.
Whine, vent, lament, complain.... try to force players to play the game in a way they do not enjoy, they will quit the game, and CCP will respond.
You may think that those players quitting is a good thing. I am 100% sure that CCP does not feel the same way.
The tired old "CCPs goal is to make money so they'll ... " argument people trot out from time to time is idiotic.
Yes, CCP are a business and their goal is to make money.
But if you think that means they're going to remove or undermine core mechanics, or ditch the ruthless sandbox ethos that made EVE a success, and has allowed it to thrive for nine years, then you're stupid beyond help.
The filthy crybaby miner bears can stomp their feet and threaten to unsubscribe if CCP don't remove all hostile actions against them, but they were never the audience EVE was made for to begin with. |

Lord Zim
1924
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:02:00 -
[163] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:The tired old "CCPs goal is to make money so they'll ... " argument people trot out from time to time is idiotic.
Yes, CCP are a business and their goal is to make money.
But if you think that means they're going to remove or undermine core mechanics, or ditch the ruthless sandbox ethos that made EVE a success, and has allowed it to thrive for nine years, then you're stupid beyond help.
The filthy crybaby miner bears can stomp their feet and threaten to unsubscribe if CCP don't remove all hostile actions against them, but they were never the audience EVE was made for to begin with. In an ideal world, your response would be correct and valid, but CCP's actions as of late has me a bit worried they might not actually be compromising on that stance. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

NARDAC
Newb U
16
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:04:00 -
[164] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
The tired old "CCPs goal is to make money so they'll ... " argument people trot out from time to time is idiotic.
Yes, CCP are a business and their goal is to make money.
But if you think that means they're going to remove or undermine core mechanics, or ditch the ruthless sandbox ethos that made EVE a success, and has allowed it to thrive for nine years, then you're stupid beyond help.
The filthy crybaby miner bears can stomp their feet and threaten to unsubscribe if CCP don't remove all hostile actions against them, but they were never the audience EVE was made for to begin with.
CCP created a game that they hope will appeal to both PVPers and carebears.
I'm not arguing that CCP is going to get rid of low/null or all PVP. All I'm saying is that CCP wants both PVPers and carebears, and will ensure that there is an area of the game for each of these groups of people. I'm arguing that high-sec will remain high-sec, and will remain relatively safe for carebears.
Any war on carebears that results in the carebears quitting the game, and lowering paid subscriptions will result in nerfs.
Just like anything that began making PVPers quit would result in game changes.
CCP wants both, and that is okay. |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
550
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:07:00 -
[165] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Dar Manic wrote: You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec.
False. You have access to the player-controlled market even in highsec.
This is a moot point of the pedantic. When hi sec ppl complain about pvp they are talking about combat , pew pew, not playing the markets (which can also be called pvp), but no one is complaining about that aspect. Bring it up is just muddying the waters.
Tal |

Lord Zim
1924
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:09:00 -
[166] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:This is a mute point of the pedantic. Moot point. It's definitely not mute.
Talon SilverHawk wrote:When hi sec ppl complain about pvp they are talking about combat , pew pew, not playing the markets (which can also be called pvp) Then they should be more specific. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
362
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:28:00 -
[167] - Quote
NARDAC wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:
The tired old "CCPs goal is to make money so they'll ... " argument people trot out from time to time is idiotic.
Yes, CCP are a business and their goal is to make money.
But if you think that means they're going to remove or undermine core mechanics, or ditch the ruthless sandbox ethos that made EVE a success, and has allowed it to thrive for nine years, then you're stupid beyond help.
The filthy crybaby miner bears can stomp their feet and threaten to unsubscribe if CCP don't remove all hostile actions against them, but they were never the audience EVE was made for to begin with.
CCP created a game that they hope will appeal to both PVPers and carebears. I'm not arguing that CCP is going to get rid of low/null or all PVP. All I'm saying is that CCP wants both PVPers and carebears, and will ensure that there is an area of the game for each of these groups of people. I'm arguing that high-sec will remain high-sec, and will remain relatively safe for carebears. Any war on carebears that results in the carebears quitting the game, and lowering paid subscriptions will result in nerfs. Just like anything that began making PVPers quit would result in game changes. CCP wants both, and that is okay. ' I know you like to see it that way, but you're wrong. CCP created a total conflict game, with "pew-pew" PVP at it's heart. if they made the game "for carebears", you wouldn't even be able to ACTIVATE a weapon in high sec, aka there would be zero non-consensual pvp there. "High-Sec" punishes "instant" non-consensual, but CCP still provides a mechanism (wardecs) to even get around that.
High Sec is nothing more than a "necessary evil" because hardcore players alone can't sustain the EVE "ecosystem" and even true hardcore players need a stable zone for trading and other activities. But High Sec is not a FOCUS of EVE online, EVE is a game about the players, about what the players build, what the players destroy.
High Sec = necessary evil
Low Sec = pvp/conflcit "starter zone" (notice FW is there) with some player controlled elements (FW again, which CCP stated was a "stepping Stone to null")
Null Sec = The place where the players rule, aka the place where EVE ONLINE Takes place. The place where damn near EVERY CCP advertisement is focuses on, the place where battles occur that make the real life NEWS. The beating heart of the EVE Online virtual economy. The PVP play land of a game CENTERED on PVP. The place CCP has been encouraging (to little avail) high sec carebears to go to for almost 10 years ect ect ect.
Wormholes = New and improved Null Sec
It's almost funny to me how high sec people's preferences shade their perceptions, where all of a sudden "High Sec" is some how the equal of the real player driven parts of the game rather than a starting point and stable trade zone. There is no "equality" between the various "sectors" or whatever you call them.
But as usual, human being prefer to see what they want to, rather than what is actually there.
|

Esan Vartesa
Samarkand Financial
271
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:38:00 -
[168] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
As someone who sits right outside the Finance Director of my company's office and right next to the Finance team (they are all accountants btw) they couldn't care less if...
Hey Kirchner! The printer is on the fritz again. Chop chop!
|

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
550
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:41:00 -
[169] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Talon SilverHawk wrote:This is a mute point of the pedantic. Moot point. It's definitely not mute. Talon SilverHawk wrote:When hi sec ppl complain about pvp they are talking about combat , pew pew, not playing the markets (which can also be called pvp) Then they should be more specific.
Thanks I think the mute was wishful thinking : )
Tal |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
883
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 12:44:00 -
[170] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:You want PVP, go to null sec. You want PVP, go to low sec. You want PVP, go to WH. You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec.
Well unfortunately you'd be doing pvp in high sec no matter if it's killing ships or playing 0.01isk wars, scanning sites, missioning, FW, mining, producing, hauling... brb |

Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
91
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 13:13:00 -
[171] - Quote
I don't see whats so hard to understand. Eve is about combat & warfare which means you undock, your at risk plain & simple. Dosen't matter high low null WH those rules of engagement apply everywhere and CCP is not about to change them. So toughen up, fly smart, don't fly what you can't afford to lose or find another game. |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
221
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 14:37:00 -
[172] - Quote
If it's all about the PvP and that's the core of the game, why so much scraping the bottom of the barrel? R.I.P. Vile Rat |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
362
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 15:51:00 -
[173] - Quote
Ioci wrote:If it's all about the PvP and that's the core of the game, why so much scraping the bottom of the barrel?
That doesn't make any sense, ask the question against and use more words this time.
|

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:27:00 -
[174] - Quote
Ioci wrote:If it's all about the PvP and that's the core of the game, why so much scraping the bottom of the barrel?
It's not all about just PvP. People play games with semantics (look that one up!!) but it's not about just PvP. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:28:00 -
[175] - Quote
Xpaulusx wrote:I don't see whats so hard to understand. Eve is about combat & warfare which means you undock, your at risk plain & simple. Dosen't matter high low null WH those rules of engagement apply everywhere and CCP is not about to change them. So toughen up, fly smart, don't fly what you can't afford to lose or find another game.
Your bold part is the part you have wrong. It's not just combat and warfare. Plenty of people are playing Eve, as we speak, who are not the least bit interested in that part. It's not what they enjoy, why they play, spend their money, etc. It's what you think Eve is about. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:30:00 -
[176] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Dar Manic wrote:You want PVP, go to null sec. You want PVP, go to low sec. You want PVP, go to WH. You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec. Well unfortunately you'd be doing pvp in high sec no matter if it's killing ships or playing 0.01isk wars, scanning sites, missioning, FW, mining, producing, hauling...
Wrong. You're playing semantics with PvP. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
478
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:34:00 -
[177] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Dar Manic wrote:You want PVP, go to null sec. You want PVP, go to low sec. You want PVP, go to WH. You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec. Well unfortunately you'd be doing pvp in high sec no matter if it's killing ships or playing 0.01isk wars, scanning sites, missioning, FW, mining, producing, hauling... Wrong. You're playing semantics with PvP.
Do you understand what "PVP" stands for, mate?
Hint: It's "player vs player". Not specifically combat. Anything you do that competes with another player is pvp. EVE is a PVP game. |

Roderick Grey
Assisted Genocide Black Legion.
92
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 16:58:00 -
[178] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Dar Manic wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Dar Manic wrote:You want PVP, go to null sec. You want PVP, go to low sec. You want PVP, go to WH. You don't want PVP, go to hi-sec. Well unfortunately you'd be doing pvp in high sec no matter if it's killing ships or playing 0.01isk wars, scanning sites, missioning, FW, mining, producing, hauling... Wrong. You're playing semantics with PvP. Do you understand what "PVP" stands for, mate? Hint: It's "player vs player". Not specifically combat. Anything you do that competes with another player is pvp. EVE is a PVP game.
See, now the mistake you've made is that you think he actually has enough knowledge of the English language to understand the literal definition.
In his mind PvP means "u dun got 2 shot da ships o7" |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
489
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:23:00 -
[179] - Quote
When people aren't getting blown up in high sec, it impacts other areas of the game. People who don't want pvp in high sec either don't understand this, or they don't care.
You directly impact me living in null. No matter what you do in high sec, you are directly impacting how I play the game. Everything you put on the market, directly impacts me, everytime you generate more ISK it impacts me.
I do not live in high sec.
You can impact me, and you don't want me to impact you. EVE should never work that way.
PvP is the only tool that CCP has given players to have an impact on high sec.
Believe it or not, some of us actually give a **** about other parts of the game that don't involve blowing people up, but require you to get blown up. The market and economy are no small aspect of EVE, and many of you want CCP to destroy that gameplay for a lot of us; some of you unknowingly.
Right now we have a real economy in EVE. It lives, it breathes, it can be manipulated in same aspects, and can be speculated on. It is this way because nowhere in EVE are you immune from getting blown up by another player. The PvE content is not sufficient in causing enough destruction to allow the market to work as it does.
No pvp in high sec would result in a marekt like you can find in any other MMO, an auction house economy. I do not want to play that kind of game; I would be playing WoW if I did. I do not want to play an EVE were plex goes up into the billions of ISK because people were able to farm PvE content endlessly without ever losing the billion ISK ship they're flying.
The more CCP does to interfere with PvP in high sec, the harder they make it to slow mining operations and mission running in high sec, the worse they make my gameplay experience.
You have no business complaining about losing a ship you can afford to replace.
You have no business complaining about losing a shiip you can't afford to replace.
Some of you keep talking about PvP will destroy EVE; no it won't. It hasn't in 9 years. There is no reason for EVE, which has steadily grown sinse '03 to make high sec safer. CCP created an MMO with a particular vision, they need to keep that in mind when they make changes to mechanics.
CCP especially needs to remember that they have MANY fans that play EVE because of that vision; many for nearly a decade. People are not leaving EVE in droves due to PvP in high sec, and CCP needs to start looking at other ways to attract and retain people in EVE that doesn't involve nerfing the **** out of high sec PvP.
Things like WiS, and station exploration, the PoS revamp, ring mining. These things are what EVE needs; not less PvP in high sec.
Splitting the world in two did not benefit UO. |

JustAnotherPlaceHolder
Content Providers
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:31:00 -
[180] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Why is it that people think this game is for everyone?
EVE is clearly fueled by competition and cannot survive without it. You don't need to spend 15$ per month to look at nebulae and 3D ship models.
Anyone who uses "forcing me to do this" in their argument intrigues me; I have no idea why they are spending money on this game in the first place. The only thing really forcing you to anything is your own brain. If you are tired of getting your progress slowed, it's nobody's fault but your own that you do not use the tools given to everyone.
If you don't like shooting ships, that's your problem. Just don't try telling me those who shoot ships have an unfair advantage when it is clearly an advantage. In fact, anything you do in this game gives you an advantage over those who don't.
That is just as crazy as people moving to a different country and asking for laws to accommodate their personal needs or beliefs. Clearly, this game is not for you. The complexities of propaganda management and forum warrioring are clearly beyond your intellectual capacity. If you don't have the intelligence necessary to navigate the categorized ignorance of trolls, you're never going to amount to much.
I recommend you spend some time reading books like Talking Right, which cover this sort of communication and the importance of choosing trigger words. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |