| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Roderick Grey
Assisted Genocide Black Legion.
92
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 03:00:00 -
[211] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:
No, not at all. I'm assuming that you've realized how mistaken you are?
And here I thought I was curing stupid... |

Keen Fallsword
Skyway Patrol
79
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 05:13:00 -
[212] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Why is it that people think this game is for everyone?
EVE is clearly fueled by competition and cannot survive without it. You don't need to spend 15$ per month to look at nebulae and 3D ship models.
Anyone who uses "forcing me to do this" in their argument intrigues me; I have no idea why they are spending money on this game in the first place. The only thing really forcing you to anything is your own brain. If you are tired of getting your progress slowed, it's nobody's fault but your own that you do not use the tools given to everyone.
If you don't like shooting ships, that's your problem. Just don't try telling me those who shoot ships have an unfair advantage when it is clearly an advantage. In fact, anything you do in this game gives you an advantage over those who don't.
That is just as crazy as people moving to a different country and asking for laws to accommodate their personal needs or beliefs.
Haha ! Take a break bro.. Game is starting to be your reality .. |

Angeal MacNova
LankTech Adult Entertainment Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 06:43:00 -
[213] - Quote
Justice Comes wrote:It really just depends how many players (money) CCP wants. We know the vast preponderance of people play in high-sec. The math is easy enough from there. I give you this not-uncommon opinion from outside of New Eden: "The problem is that EVE is a very self-selecting community, and frankly some of its devs and a good number of its high-profile players are the sort who only have fun at someone else's expense. Consequently, too few folks in the larger MMO community want to play EVE. It's a game made by wolves, for wolves, and therefore it's quite limited in scope compared to a more well-rounded sandbox. Yes, EVE offers more potential than any other current MMO, but because of the personalities involved, that potential almost always translates into new and amazing ways to be an ass." http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/10/26/some-assembly-required-why-soe-should-be-leading-the-sandbox-ch/So again, it just boils down to how many players they want :p
This deserves to be quoted. I've never come across truer words. Although I will say that there are those that play who simply like the concept of a space game like this with all that it has to offer. What they do is pve and only engage in pvp in defense. They are often called carebears by the very people described above. This isn't the only MMO I've played that harbered this type of crowd. Aion is a fine example of a game that had a mass exodus of players forcing drastic changes to be made to the game but too late. Now it's playerbase is compareable to that of EVE.
A game with so much potential but some companies are determined to try and make pvpve work when the crowd this attracts is both a bad one and a small one. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
480
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 09:24:00 -
[214] - Quote
Justice Comes wrote:It really just depends how many players (money) CCP wants. We know the vast preponderance of people play in high-sec. The math is easy enough from there. I give you this not-uncommon opinion from outside of New Eden: "The problem is that EVE is a very self-selecting community, and frankly some of its devs and a good number of its high-profile players are the sort who only have fun at someone else's expense. Consequently, too few folks in the larger MMO community want to play EVE. It's a game made by wolves, for wolves, and therefore it's quite limited in scope compared to a more well-rounded sandbox. Yes, EVE offers more potential than any other current MMO, but because of the personalities involved, that potential almost always translates into new and amazing ways to be an ass." http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/10/26/some-assembly-required-why-soe-should-be-leading-the-sandbox-ch/So again, it just boils down to how many players they want :p
I can't think of an MMO that is a more "well rounded" sandbox than EVE. Anyway, as for catering to the mass bear audience... in the very short term it seems desirable - wow has a trillion players, lets do whatever they did! Yeah! But look at all the other wow clones out there, they have a nice initial little bubble, then in a few months they're utterly dead. Does CCP want longevity with a smaller playerbase of wolves, or a large player base of bears that completely vanishes after a year, tops? |

Uzbeg Khan
Capital Construction Corp.
5
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 12:26:00 -
[215] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: I find it rather ironic that in this game, you can do whatever you want, yet people choose to be ass hats.
What is ironic, is that you have no idea what ironic means. I think the word you were looking for was "surprising". However, there is nothing surprising here; it's called human nature. Additionally, those "ass hats" give value to good actions and without them there would be no contrast between good and evil.
It actually IS rather surprising. It's not human nature to be evil, quite the opposite.
The ability to have a small area in your life where you can live out your more evil sides without facing consequences just tend to bring out the worst in people who dont dare to face said consequences in real life.
/edit: I'd love to see how this game would be 2 days after alot of nullbears got their wishes granted, and Concord was retired. Good luck buying your cheapish doctrine ships, and especially the trit needed to build your SC's :) |

Lord Zim
1925
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 12:41:00 -
[216] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I can't think of an MMO that is a more "well rounded" sandbox than EVE. Anyway, as for catering to the mass bear audience... in the very short term it seems desirable - wow has a trillion players, lets do whatever they did! Yeah! But look at all the other wow clones out there, they have a nice initial little bubble, then in a few months they're utterly dead. Does CCP want longevity with a smaller playerbase of wolves, or a large player base of bears that completely vanishes after a year, tops? The problem with catering to the "mass bear audience" is that while EVE is one of the more well-rounded sandbox MMOs out there, just endlessly making things for sale in Jita, endlessly mining or endlessly running missions etc isn't going to set a vast majority of players' pants on fire for years on end, because in this aspect the game sucks ass. It is positively awful. The only real saving grace of EVE is the fact it isn't just a sandbox, it's a sandbox with other players, and apparently evidence shows that the chance of a player staying beyond a few weeks/a few months goes up the instant the player joins a player corp and starts to feel like he's contributing to something, f.ex making stuff for their alliance's war machine or whatever the group starts to work towards.
Honestly, if you're going to play EVE and try to not interact with anyone, you might as well just purchase X3 and play a much better singleplayer game. I'm sure CCP thanks you for not doing that, though, but you'd be playing a better game if you had.
Uzbeg Khan wrote:It actually IS rather surprising. It's not human nature to be evil, quite the opposite. You must be new to the internet.
Uzbeg Khan wrote:/edit: I'd love to see how this game would be 2 days after alot of nullbears got their wishes granted, and Concord was retired. Good luck buying your cheapish doctrine ships, and especially the trit needed to build your SC's :) Why do people continually assume a large portion of people in nullsec wants CCP to remove concord? Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
481
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 12:56:00 -
[217] - Quote
Uzbeg Khan wrote:Thor Kerrigan wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: I find it rather ironic that in this game, you can do whatever you want, yet people choose to be ass hats.
What is ironic, is that you have no idea what ironic means. I think the word you were looking for was "surprising". However, there is nothing surprising here; it's called human nature. Additionally, those "ass hats" give value to good actions and without them there would be no contrast between good and evil. It actually IS rather surprising. It's not human nature to be evil, quite the opposite. The ability to have a small area in your life where you can live out your more evil sides without facing consequences just tend to bring out the worst in people who dont dare to face said consequences in real life. /edit: I'd love to see how this game would be 2 days after alot of nullbears got their wishes granted, and Concord was retired. Good luck buying your cheapish doctrine ships, and especially the trit needed to build your SC's in an environment where it's quite hard to justify setting up an efficient mining op. :)
Greed, selfishness, etc are big parts of human nature. The fact that they manifest the way they do in EVE isn't surprising at all. As for "bringing out the worst in people"... eh, get over it. It's a video game, and many of the ways to advance in it rely on doing it at someone elses expense.
As for nullseccers, I don't think many want highsec completely abolished and turned into nullsec, they just understand that having an area with absolute safety is damaging to the dynamics of the game, so when changes (or suggestions/whines) are made that look to be heading that way they resist them.
As for cheap ships, etc... bears need to get over themselves. "b b but without us ships would be expensive", yeah, great, but at the same time the highsec bears are responsible for the ridiculous plex prices |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 13:53:00 -
[218] - Quote
Roderick Grey wrote:Dar Manic wrote:
No, not at all. I'm assuming that you've realized how mistaken you are?
And here I thought I was curing stupid...
I can't beat the ignorant... you drag me down to your level and beat me with your lifetime of experience. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
362
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 13:58:00 -
[219] - Quote
Justice Comes wrote:It really just depends how many players (money) CCP wants. We know the vast preponderance of people play in high-sec. The math is easy enough from there.
Why people cling to this ignorance is just, wow.
You do not know any such thing, and that's CCP fault. The majority of characters are in high sec, but that says nothing of how the individual account holder feels. I've got 4 accounts with all slots filled, SEVEN of my characters are in Empire space right this moment and i do high sec incursions everday, yet I'm not a "high sec player" by any kind of choice, it's simply the easiest way to do what I need to do right now.
Quote:I give you this not-uncommon opinion from outside of New Eden: "The problem is that EVE is a very self-selecting community, and frankly some of its devs and a good number of its high-profile players are the sort who only have fun at someone else's expense. Consequently, too few folks in the larger MMO community want to play EVE. It's a game made by wolves, for wolves, and therefore it's quite limited in scope compared to a more well-rounded sandbox. Yes, EVE offers more potential than any other current MMO, but because of the personalities involved, that potential almost always translates into new and amazing ways to be an ass." http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/10/26/some-assembly-required-why-soe-should-be-leading-the-sandbox-ch/So again, it just boils down to how many players they want :p
1st of all, screw that guy, seriously.
And what is wrong with a game BY wolves, FOR Wolves? Does everything have to be happy happy fun time? And if the players are so horrible, why are all the carebears coming to and staying in the game (again rhetorical question, they are mostly masochists and malcontent rebels without a cause who want change for the sake of change).
i'm not the most wolfy person (I do some pew pew pvp, but no ganking or bumping and not much gate camping at all), I spent last night killing Blood Raiders in anomalies and hauling stuff. But I understand and support the establish nature of the game I'm playing and seriously wish the EVE haters would screw off somewhere else. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
482
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 14:43:00 -
[220] - Quote
Sheep waltzes into the lair of a wolf pack cries that it's full of wolves stays there anyway
welcome to eve online |

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
299
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 19:35:00 -
[221] - Quote
Justice Comes wrote:It really just depends how many players (money) CCP wants. [...] So again, it just boils down to how many players they want
The whole point of this thread is that I see no value in this argument. Would you support EVE becoming a medieval-fantasy MMO if it meant we would get our player-base to 2 million subscribers? According to your logic, you would.
All I'm saying is, why not just create a new game from scratch then? |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
10684
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 21:01:00 -
[222] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:Roderick Grey wrote:Dar Manic wrote:
No, not at all. I'm assuming that you've realized how mistaken you are?
And here I thought I was curing stupid... I can't beat the ignorant... they drag me down to their level and beat me with their lifetime of experience. We wouldn't expect you to start beating yourself, even when you are wrong.
PvP = Player verse Player. This includes, but not limited to: Mining. Trading. Ship spinning. Hauling. Combat. etc. etc. I could go on with the list, but you still wouldn't understand the concept.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
46
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 14:18:00 -
[223] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Dar Manic wrote:Roderick Grey wrote:Dar Manic wrote:
No, not at all. I'm assuming that you've realized how mistaken you are?
And here I thought I was curing stupid... I can't beat the ignorant... they drag me down to their level and beat me with their lifetime of experience. We wouldn't expect you to start beating yourself, even when you are wrong. PvP = Player verse Player. This includes, but not limited to: Mining. Trading. Ship spinning. Hauling. Combat. etc. etc. I could go on with the list, but you still wouldn't understand the concept.
Of course I wouldn't ;)... then I read posts where people use both of the meanings in an attempt to prove Eve is really just a PvP game (read sig). That's the real problem I have. Too many posters are trying to argue Eve is a PvP (read sig) only game where everything else is just fluff. There are tons of players who don't PvP (read sig) and don't want to... it would be news to them that Eve is a PvP (read sig) game.
So I ask the question of you as I have asked of the others: If a new player comes onto the forums asking to learn PvP, what skills do you suggest to them? That's what I thought. Thanks for playing. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
1073
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 14:48:00 -
[224] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:If a new player comes onto the forums asking to learn PvP, what skills do you suggest to them? That's what I thought. Thanks for playing.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up. Thank you Start with rifters, but learn how to interpret widely available information before your stupidity makes you look like a not particularly bright troll. www.minerbumping.com - because your tears are delicious |

March rabbit
Aliastra
262
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 14:56:00 -
[225] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. you made a mistake. independent of goonswarm efforts 0.0 sec area is not called "high sec". You (still) should have said "0.0 sec bears" |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
1073
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 14:58:00 -
[226] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:baltec1 wrote:Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. you made a mistake. independent of goonswarm efforts 0.0 sec ares is not called "high sec". You (still) should have said "0.0 sec bears" Your goonrage is showing. www.minerbumping.com - because your tears are delicious |

March rabbit
Aliastra
262
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 15:15:00 -
[227] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:March rabbit wrote:baltec1 wrote:Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like. you made a mistake. independent of goonswarm efforts 0.0 sec ares is not called "high sec". You (still) should have said "0.0 sec bears" Your goonrage is showing. for your pleasure  |

Karrl Tian
Yarrbusters
36
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 15:45:00 -
[228] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Sheep waltzes into the lair of a wolf pack cries that it's full of wolves stays there anyway
welcome to eve online
Continuing the fable....
Pack of wolves goes looking for sheep in the woods, find out they've covered themselves in camo, hide in the trees, communicate with closed channel radios and only fight when they outnumber wolves 5:1 with AK-47s. Wolves cry it's unfair and say they just want "gud fites" with the sheep. 
They try multiple times and fail and their whines fall on deaf ears. So they stop looking for sheep in the forest and go slaughter veal cows (cows locked into stables so their legs turn to jelly and they do nothing but eat all day) and when the cows complain, the wolves point to the sheep in the forest and say HTFU.
Fearing a loss in profit, the farmer makes the stables sturdier, gets better guard dogs and makes the cows fatter. The wolves still figure out how to kill the veal cows "profitably", so the rancher tells every redneck in town that they can hunt wolves on his property to their heart's content.
Welcome to present-day eve online. |

Fabulous Rod
Darkfall Corp
11
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:20:00 -
[229] - Quote
I hate when ppl use the word "forcing" when it something is actually optional. You know who you are and you should be ashamed. |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:30:00 -
[230] - Quote
Karrl Tian wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Sheep waltzes into the lair of a wolf pack cries that it's full of wolves stays there anyway
welcome to eve online Continuing the fable.... Pack of wolves goes looking for sheep, find out they've covered themselves in camo, hide in the trees, communicate with closed channel radios and only fight when they outnumber wolves 5:1 with AK-47s. Wolves cry it's unfair and say they just want "gud fites" with the sheep.  They try multiple times and fail and their whines fall on deaf ears. So they stop looking for sheep in the forest and go slaughter veal cows (cows locked into stables so their legs turn to jelly and they do nothing but eat all day) and when the cows complain, the wolves point to the sheep and say HTFU. The sheep tell the cows how to protect themselves. They ignore them and keep whining and dying. Even the wolves tell them how to protect themselves, but they still keep whining and dying. Fearing a loss in profit, the farmer makes the stables sturdier, gets better guard dogs and makes the cows fatter. The wolves still figure out how to kill the veal cows "profitably", so the farmer tells every redneck in town that they can hunt wolves on his property to their heart's content. Welcome to present-day eve online.
hahahah...good one. The wolf is too noble an animal to be the PvP'ers of Eve though. Vulture or hyena are better descriptors. But the message is a good one none the less. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
335
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:30:00 -
[231] - Quote
It isn't really forced, more about bait and switch. EVE is like the credit card or internet bundle that starts revealing fee's after you sign the contract. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1873
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:54:00 -
[232] - Quote
We forget that a lot of people who play this game see forcing others to leave this game as "their game", and so that's their goal in the game and seek out any mechanics to that end.
|

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
10684
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 15:34:00 -
[233] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:Mag's wrote:We wouldn't expect you to start beating yourself, even when you are wrong.
PvP = Player verse Player. This includes, but not limited to: Mining. Trading. Ship spinning. Hauling. Combat. etc. etc. I could go on with the list, but you still wouldn't understand the concept. Of course I wouldn't ;)... then I read posts where people use both of the meanings in an attempt to prove Eve is really just a PvP game (read sig). That's the real problem I have. Too many posters are trying to argue Eve is a PvP (read sig) only game where everything else is just fluff. There are tons of players who don't PvP (read sig) and don't want to... it would be news to them that Eve is a PvP (read sig) game. So I ask the question of you as I have asked of the others: If a new player comes onto the forums asking to learn PvP, what skills do you suggest to them? That's what I thought. Thanks for playing. Your limitations on what the term PvP means is merely that, your limitation. It doesn't change the fact that PvP means Player verses Player. In the context of Eve's game play, it means Eve is PvP centric.
As far as your question goes, it would depend on the circumstance in which the question was asked. 
Thanks for playing.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
448
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 15:44:00 -
[234] - Quote
Karrl Tian wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Sheep waltzes into the lair of a wolf pack cries that it's full of wolves stays there anyway
welcome to eve online Continuing the fable.... Pack of wolves goes looking for sheep, find out they've covered themselves in camo, hide in the trees, communicate with closed channel radios and only fight when they outnumber wolves 5:1 with AK-47s. Wolves cry it's unfair and say they just want "gud fites" with the sheep.  They try multiple times and fail and their whines fall on deaf ears. So they stop looking for sheep in the forest and go slaughter veal cows (cows locked into stables so their legs turn to jelly and they do nothing but eat all day) and when the cows complain, the wolves point to the sheep and say HTFU. The sheep tell the cows how to protect themselves. They ignore them and keep whining and dying. Even the wolves tell them how to protect themselves, but they still keep whining and dying. Fearing a loss in profit, the farmer makes the stables sturdier, gets better guard dogs and makes the cows fatter. The wolves still figure out how to kill the veal cows "profitably", so the farmer tells every redneck in town that they can hunt wolves on his property to their heart's content. Welcome to present-day eve online. This one made me smile. Thanks :) |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 14:15:00 -
[235] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Dar Manic wrote:Mag's wrote:We wouldn't expect you to start beating yourself, even when you are wrong.
PvP = Player verse Player. This includes, but not limited to: Mining. Trading. Ship spinning. Hauling. Combat. etc. etc. I could go on with the list, but you still wouldn't understand the concept. Of course I wouldn't ;)... then I read posts where people use both of the meanings in an attempt to prove Eve is really just a PvP game (read sig). That's the real problem I have. Too many posters are trying to argue Eve is a PvP (read sig) only game where everything else is just fluff. There are tons of players who don't PvP (read sig) and don't want to... it would be news to them that Eve is a PvP (read sig) game. So I ask the question of you as I have asked of the others: If a new player comes onto the forums asking to learn PvP, what skills do you suggest to them? That's what I thought. Thanks for playing. Your limitations on what the term PvP means is merely that, your limitation. It doesn't change the fact that PvP means Player verses Player. In the context of Eve's game play, it means Eve is PvP centric. As far as your question goes, it would depend on the circumstance in which the question was asked.  Thanks for playing.
And you answered it exactly the way I anticipated to prove my point. It means one thing when you want it to then something else entirely when it fits that need. Thanks for playing!!!
Eve is PVP centric... I could agree with that... except later on same people say Eve is all/only about pew pew PVP (read sig). Two totally different meanings used in the same argument to try to prove that Eve is PVP (read sig). Eve is not just about PVP (read sig). You cannot argue Eve is a PVP centric game (Player vs. Player) then turn around and say it's just about PVP (read sig).
Player vs Player centric is NOT the same as Player shooting vs Player shooting centric. They are NOT the same thing. PVP (read sig) is just a portion of Eve, not the end all/be all/only thing. I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up.-á Thank you. |

Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox
2222
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 14:22:00 -
[236] - Quote
Azumi Zimu wrote:baltec1 wrote: Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like.
You guys waged a campaign against high-sec miners. You used early 20th century Anti-Semitic propaganda. You said you hated what they stood for. Not that I log in... Keep up the hypocrisy space-nerds 
Yes, and they did stuff, IN SPACE, mechanically, to do it. They played within the rules and created emergent gameplay. Awesome. If the miners/carebears had united in a similar in game mechanical way and rose up to fight the griefers, it would have been awesome.
But you don't do that. Instead, you whine on the forums and try to get CCP to limit gameplay for others, since it hurts you.
You want to stop people? Go stop them. Stop trying to hide behind CCP.
Torn from grace, gotta find your faith or the devils gonna claim your soul
|

Elliot Vodka
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:04:00 -
[237] - Quote
Saede Riordan wrote:Azumi Zimu wrote:baltec1 wrote: Yet the high sec bears continue to try to get rid of playstyles they dont like.
You guys waged a campaign against high-sec miners. You used early 20th century Anti-Semitic propaganda. You said you hated what they stood for. Not that I log in... Keep up the hypocrisy space-nerds  Yes, and they did stuff, IN SPACE, mechanically, to do it. They played within the rules and created emergent gameplay. Awesome. If the miners/carebears had united in a similar in game mechanical way and rose up to fight the griefers, it would have been awesome. But you don't do that. Instead, you whine on the forums and try to get CCP to limit gameplay for others, since it hurts you. You want to stop people? Go stop them. Stop trying to hide behind CCP.
What honestly makes you think carebears give a tit about each other?
Do you give a **** about anyone that isnt a threat to you? Thats why it will never work. And that is why all attempts have failed. Your mindless pipe dream of having a crap ton of mindless zombie ships band together against null sec is never going to happen. Stop dreaming.
I am a giant thruster... nothing else is required. I have no great purpose, all that's known i grow tired, destination unknown as i travel past the stars. Look at me going fast, as i fight forming scars, frying straight too the sun without guidance or crew. Ill never stop from going, Thrusting on.... thrusting though. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
396
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:15:00 -
[238] - Quote
Elliot Vodka wrote:
What honestly makes you think carebears give a tit about each other?
They don't and that's their problem, the reason why they are so incredibly vulnerable and easy to abuse. It's the reason why the CSM is and (with any rational voting mechanic) always will be dominated by null/low sec players who actually play the game in ways the game supports ie cooperatively with other people.
Quote: Do you give a **** about anyone that isnt a threat to you? Thats why it will never work. And that is why all attempts have failed. Your mindless pipe dream of having a crap ton of mindless zombie ships band together against null sec is never going to happen. Stop dreaming.
If the "high sec people" can't be bother enough to band together in a game that has VERY easy built-in methods of communicating (everything from chat to built in EVE voice and EVE mail), and consequences they face as "solo" players is simply their fault, which is all I've ever said to them.
A mere fraction of these high sec lone wolves banding together would wipe Goons and the CFC (who I am using as examples) off the map in less than a week, but that takes *gasp* talking to other people in an MMO and risking the loss of pixels... oh noes...
Benny Ohu: No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Clystan: Eve is the game of chess in a universe of checkers. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:21:00 -
[239] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:A mere fraction of these high sec lone wolves banding together would wipe Goons and the CFC (who I am using as examples) off the map in less than a week, but that takes *gasp* talking to other people in an MMO and risking the loss of pixels... oh noes... If taking sov is anything like what I've heard, these "high-sec wolves" you speak of would be bored in an hour or so.
Fake E: I take that back, miners might be eminently suitable for the task of structure grinds, if they could be troubled to step into a combat ship... |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
396
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:34:00 -
[240] - Quote
Some Rando wrote: If taking sov is anything like what I've heard, these "high-sec wolves" you speak of would be bored in an hour or so.
Well, risking boredom to fight back against people screwing with your game? Can't have that, now can we, better they run to the forums and get CCP to change EVE in their favor, which is much more reasonable.
/sarcasm
Quote:Fake E: I take that back, miners might be eminently suitable for the task of structure grinds, if they could be troubled to step into a combat ship...
LOL yea, you'd think that.
The important thing, though, is the fact that rocks never ever shoot back at them. If they did there would be very few miners period lol.
Benny Ohu: No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Clystan: Eve is the game of chess in a universe of checkers. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |