Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Wingmate
Raven's Flight Reconstructed Criticism
245
|
Posted - 2014.07.21 23:48:00 -
[391] - Quote
gui you are ugly and your opinions are terrible
there, was i bullying? or was i expressing an opinion?
it's not bullying if it's something you choose to do. if you choose to play a game, you choose to play by the rules (or lack thereof). but never mind me, keep circlejerking in your little piles of highsec pity and keep throwing real money at CCP (thereby justifying what you're trying to complain about, that a sandbox that doesn't live by your rules is a bad sandbox). i make spreadsheets for pretty cheap. contact me for more info.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=197433 |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1026
|
Posted - 2014.07.22 00:36:00 -
[392] - Quote
Just as this thread is dead for a few weeks someone revives it lol |

13 nonames
Jumpbridg
8
|
Posted - 2014.07.23 11:01:00 -
[393] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kimo Khan wrote: If said bumper is part of a gang which then proceed to gank me, why do I not get killrights on the bumper who prevented warp without using a scrambler and thus avoided invoking concord?
Because bumping is not, and never has been a flaggable action, more for practical means than anything else. Jita 4-4 undock with flaggable bumping would become a scrapyard FFA.
in all honesty most of the stations in eve need there docking and undocking range fixed
and bunping itself should be consider harassment since a lot of people have been know to use it without the intent to kill, i would like to see a collision mechanics and input a "timer" for entering exiting warp or station that you don't take damage but make it so you take damage upon in packed. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1029
|
Posted - 2014.07.23 13:12:00 -
[394] - Quote
13 nonames wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kimo Khan wrote: If said bumper is part of a gang which then proceed to gank me, why do I not get killrights on the bumper who prevented warp without using a scrambler and thus avoided invoking concord?
Because bumping is not, and never has been a flaggable action, more for practical means than anything else. Jita 4-4 undock with flaggable bumping would become a scrapyard FFA. in all honesty most of the stations in eve need there docking and undocking range fixed and bunping itself should be consider harassment since a lot of people have been know to use it without the intent to kill, i would like to see a collision mechanics and input a "timer" for entering exiting warp or station that you don't take damage but make it so you take damage upon in packed. So make it impossible to catch targets outside of a station by modifying the docking range... Umm no stop being lazy and make an insta undock. .
Bumping harassment because you think you know their intent? Really? This isn't WoW.
This being said I dislike bumping all together as a game mechanic and think it should be removed.
|

Jessie JoeCarr
Minmatar Expeditions ltd.
0
|
Posted - 2014.07.23 18:39:00 -
[395] - Quote
Easy solution would just be to increase mass of mining barges or enable them to be 'anchored' to asteroids. So either other ships ramming them only results in them moving a few m or the 'roid they're attached to has to be mined out from under them, someone whose not AFK could then attach to the next asteroid but AFK miners are then free to be bumped away. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy
1488
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 16:01:00 -
[396] - Quote
Jessie JoeCarr wrote:Easy solution would just be to increase mass of mining barges or enable them to be 'anchored' to asteroids.
The word "solution" implies the existance of a problem, but this isn't the case with bumping. I'd be fine with an anchoring ability as long as it was a highslot module and came with a penalty to mining yield. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Revis Owen
14
|
Posted - 2014.08.01 16:40:00 -
[397] - Quote
IIshira wrote:This being said I dislike bumping all together as a game mechanic and think it should be removed.
Two physical things able to non-interactively pass through each other in "normal" (non-warp) movement doesn't make real-world sense. EVE portrays some liberties with and variances to real-world physics, of course, but there shouldn't be anything as completely bogus to reality as two ships that *look* physical but are really *ghosts* that pass through each other.
If you want what you are talking about, why don't you just petition CCP to change the name of the game to "Ghost Ships In Space" and *then* change the mechanics of ship interaction to suit that game name? Agent of the New Order http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html If you do not have a current Highsec Operations Permit, please contact me for issuance. |

Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
5
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 15:14:00 -
[398] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:How about bringing mining exhumer and barge HP's down to a sensible level? That way we can forget about this stupid bumping and go back to sucide ganking miners.
Each patch makes this game more like WOW in space but don't worry CCP every step you take away from PVP allows room for another game to fill the void. I hope you are happy when you are left with only high sec bears as they provide zero to the community, fan fest, 3rd party, video content, Dust 315 content. You pandered to the scrubs of eve with the HP buff and it'll catch up with you when the PVP comunity protests at your up coming hauler buff and high sec greif nerf.
CCP this will bite you in the ass real soon, don't even think it's not going to.
I think all of null and low should declare peace for 1 month this summer and declare an unholy war against all of high sec. Huge ganking partys targetting infamous 1+ year pluss npc corp chars, massive market manipulations, Huge PLEX crashes/ Spikes, swamp all hi sec indy slots with 3 month q's.
Lol this is laughable.
Highsec makes up 80% of the Subscriber base. Look at CCP's latest chart in the dev area thing. The entirety of nullsec could quit the game and EvE would be just fine. Maybe better in a lot of ways.
Means New people would go out to 0.0 and claim SOV since there would not be anymore Super Alliances. It would be Glorious chaos once more. |

Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
5
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 15:26:00 -
[399] - Quote
I have an Idea, why don't you Helima Code people/Cult/whatever you are....
Do something about ISboxing 40 man fleets. I mean really, why are you focusing on single miners when these guys are the real threat and around? |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
8
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 22:09:00 -
[400] - Quote
I have no problem with bumping mining barges who are afk to prevent them from mining. People should be at the keyboard to reposition their ship and press F1 again. What does trouble me is bumping ships off the gate so they cannot align, to facilitate multiple waves of gankers killing them, all with no Concord response. This is clearly not a reasonable game mechanic, and I suggest that any gank attempt should make bumping ineffective for 60 seconds against the victim. This will allow non-AFK players enough time to warp off and avoid multiple waves of the exact same gankers blowing up their ship without appropriate Concord intervention. |
|

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
501
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 01:52:00 -
[401] - Quote
**** like bumping orcas for 15-30 minutes straight for multiple waves of gank characters is why this game is dying.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9339
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 02:06:00 -
[402] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:**** like bumping orcas for 15-30 minutes straight for multiple waves of gank characters is why this game is dying.
The game isn't dying(that's just a fallacy that dishonest people use to campaign for bad change), and those people should bring web alts and use scouts.
Hint, if your scout sees two Machariels on a gate, don't jump through it. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5418
|
Posted - 2014.08.30 02:22:00 -
[403] - Quote
IIshira wrote:Just as this thread is dead for a few weeks someone revives it lol
I like how you don't even have to go a page to find a response to the last necro
... you know what I mean. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
8
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 01:42:00 -
[404] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:**** like bumping orcas for 15-30 minutes straight for multiple waves of gank characters is why this game is dying.
The game isn't dying(that's just a fallacy that dishonest people use to campaign for bad change), and those people should bring web alts and use scouts. Hint, if your scout sees two Machariels on a gate, don't jump through it.
Or just design the game so that CONCORD properly responds to criminal activity, which includes unlawful entrapment. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1154
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 20:08:00 -
[405] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:**** like bumping orcas for 15-30 minutes straight for multiple waves of gank characters is why this game is dying.
The game isn't dying(that's just a fallacy that dishonest people use to campaign for bad change), and those people should bring web alts and use scouts. Hint, if your scout sees two Machariels on a gate, don't jump through it. Or just design the game so that CONCORD properly responds to criminal activity, which includes unlawful entrapment.
So make it where bumping someone gets you CONCORD'ed... That would make Jita so much fun! |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1154
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 20:11:00 -
[406] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:**** like bumping orcas for 15-30 minutes straight for multiple waves of gank characters is why this game is dying.
Confirmed Eve is dying post #734974 |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
10
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 22:33:00 -
[407] - Quote
No, just make it so that once CONCORD arrives on scene the gank victim gets 60 seconds of invulnerability from CONCORD. |

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5431
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 00:06:00 -
[408] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:No, just make it so that once CONCORD arrives on scene the gank victim gets 60 seconds of invulnerability from CONCORD.
1) Crossposting is bad. Crossposting in a necroed thread is worse.
2) You mean incorporeality, since invulnerable things can still get bumped. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 00:56:00 -
[409] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:No, just make it so that once CONCORD arrives on scene the gank victim gets 60 seconds of invulnerability from CONCORD. 1) Crossposting is bad. Crossposting in a necroed thread is worse. 2) You mean incorporeality, since invulnerable things can still get bumped.
The posting to each thread was appropriate to the topic therein. I'm not concerned with the name, the key is that the gank victim be able to escape before the next wave of gankers comes. |

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5431
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 00:59:00 -
[410] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:The posting to each thread was appropriate to the topic therein. I'm not concerned with the name, the key is that the gank victim be able to escape before the next wave of gankers comes.
That is currently the case.
What you're asking for is that they be automagically entitled to escape, which is different and relies on your false supposition that CONCORD is a police force tasked with enforcing a system of laws that is in any way similar to the extant systems in the real world. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |
|

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
11
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:03:00 -
[411] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:The posting to each thread was appropriate to the topic therein. I'm not concerned with the name, the key is that the gank victim be able to escape before the next wave of gankers comes. That is currently the case. What you're asking for is that they be automagically entitled to escape, which is different and relies on your false supposition that CONCORD is a police force tasked with enforcing a system of laws that is in any way similar to the extant systems in the real world.
No it isn't....bumping can make it impossible for a freighter to escape. That CONCORD would sit by and allow that is nothing short of absurd. |

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5431
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:18:00 -
[412] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:The posting to each thread was appropriate to the topic therein. I'm not concerned with the name, the key is that the gank victim be able to escape before the next wave of gankers comes. That is currently the case. What you're asking for is that they be automagically entitled to escape, which is different and relies on your false supposition that CONCORD is a police force tasked with enforcing a system of laws that is in any way similar to the extant systems in the real world. No it isn't....bumping can make it impossible for a freighter to escape. That CONCORD would sit by and allow that is nothing short of absurd.
Yes, if the bumper does his job perfectly, and the freighter pilot does nothing, the freighter will not escape. 
CONCORD's only purpose related to this is to punish Criminal Actions in HS. Bumping is not a Criminal Action, regardless of what space it occurs in, so why should CONCORD care?
Once again, you are confusing CONCORD with an RL Police Force and New Edens laws with the laws in your jurisdiction. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
14
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:37:00 -
[413] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:The posting to each thread was appropriate to the topic therein. I'm not concerned with the name, the key is that the gank victim be able to escape before the next wave of gankers comes. That is currently the case. What you're asking for is that they be automagically entitled to escape, which is different and relies on your false supposition that CONCORD is a police force tasked with enforcing a system of laws that is in any way similar to the extant systems in the real world. No it isn't....bumping can make it impossible for a freighter to escape. That CONCORD would sit by and allow that is nothing short of absurd. Yes, if the bumper does his job perfectly, and the freighter pilot does nothing, the freighter will not escape.  CONCORD's only purpose related to this is to punish Criminal Actions in HS. Bumping is not a Criminal Action, regardless of what space it occurs in, so why should CONCORD care? Once again, you are confusing CONCORD with an RL Police Force and New Edens laws with the laws in your jurisdiction.
No, my point was that if BOTH SIDES act optimally the freighter still cannot escape. And the point is that whatever the function of CONCORD there is no conceivable way that it would simply sit there and let the freighter be pinned down and then killed. |

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5431
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 01:44:00 -
[414] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:No, my point was that if BOTH SIDES act optimally the freighter still cannot escape.
Wrong.
Quote:And the point is that whatever the function of CONCORD there is no conceivable way that it would simply sit there and let the freighter be pinned down and then killed.
That would be true, if and only If either CONCORD had an investigative role like RL Police do, or bumping were a Criminal Action in EVE. Neither of those are true.
Again, CONCORD's role is not and never has been to protect the victim. CONCORD's role is solely to punish any Criminal Actions in HS. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 04:07:00 -
[415] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:No, my point was that if BOTH SIDES act optimally the freighter still cannot escape. Wrong. And I contend that I'm right. I think it's impossible to prove either way without CCP input. Quote:And the point is that whatever the function of CONCORD there is no conceivable way that it would simply sit there and let the freighter be pinned down and then killed. That would be true, if and only If either CONCORD had an investigative role like RL Police do, or bumping were a Criminal Action in EVE. Neither of those are true. Again, CONCORD's role is not and never has been to protect the victim. CONCORD's role is solely to punish any Criminal Actions in HS. The reason we're going round and round is because we both have different assumptions about CONCORD's role in EVE. My assumptions are based off of current game mechanics and various statements made by CCP employees (Devs and GMs). How did you come up with your assumptions?
I quoted CCP Falcon, who directly analogized CONCORD to a law enforcement agency. I pointed out the absurdity of the current situation, and I proposed a workable solution. But again, I'm not really look to convince the gankers on this thread of my ideas, it is much more for the benefit of CCP. As I've quoted before "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
|

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5434
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 04:10:00 -
[416] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:I quoted CCP Falcon, who directly analogized CONCORD to a law enforcement agency. I pointed out the absurdity of the current situation, and I proposed a workable solution. But again, I'm not really look to convince the gankers on this thread of my ideas, it is much more for the benefit of CCP. As I've quoted before "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
CCP Falcon wrote:CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive rather than proactive.
"Like" a law enforcement agency, not "the same as" "Reactive and punitive" not "proactive"
Helping someone in between ganking runs is *proactive*
And again, it's only absurd if you don't recognize that New Eden has different laws than the jurisdictions you are familiar with. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 04:12:00 -
[417] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:I quoted CCP Falcon, who directly analogized CONCORD to a law enforcement agency. I pointed out the absurdity of the current situation, and I proposed a workable solution. But again, I'm not really look to convince the gankers on this thread of my ideas, it is much more for the benefit of CCP. As I've quoted before "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
CCP Falcon wrote:CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive rather than proactive. "Like" a law enforcement agency, not "the same as" "Reactive and punitive" not "proactive" Helping someone in between ganking runs is *proactive*
Intervening when bumping is used as a form of false imprisonment between ganks is "reactive" not "proactive" |

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5434
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 04:15:00 -
[418] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Intervening when bumping is used as a form of false imprisonment between ganks is "reactive" not "proactive"
Intervening in something that isn't a crime tends to, itself, be a crime.
Bumping is not and has never been a criminal action in New Eden, regardless of circumstance. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of Eden
15
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 04:18:00 -
[419] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Intervening when bumping is used as a form of false imprisonment between ganks is "reactive" not "proactive" Intervening in something that isn't a crime tends to, itself, be a crime. Bumping is not and has never been a criminal action in New Eden, regardless of circumstance.
Thank you for pointing out that bumping is not currently a crime in New Eden, I'm glad you cleared that point. If you have been paying any attention, my point was not discuss what IS a crime, but rather what SHOULD be a crime. And when bumping is used to effect false imprisonment on a freighter between waves of ganks, that clearly SHOULD be a crime.
|

Leto Thule
Fleet-Jump Surely You're Joking
1229
|
Posted - 2014.09.01 05:48:00 -
[420] - Quote
Lol bumping a criminal offense? Dude, the jita 4-4 undock would be a constant massacre. You do realize that what you are asking for would in actuality make the game vastly more dangerous than it is now, right? Killboard
https://zkillboard.com/character/90841161/
Ripard Teg sucks. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |