| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Copper Rei
Copper Corp
33
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 23:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........ I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that.......... I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
I have never been so pissed.
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
|

Xercodo
Xovoni Astronautical Manufacturing and Engineering
2353
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 23:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quiet simply T3s were too OP for those sites The Drake is a Lie |

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1552
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 23:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
They felt that 3/10 and 4/10s where for newbies and not for vets. Get use to it, it seems to be their new direction. CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE-á/ Dynamic New Eden |

Haulin Gneiss
sweet riders
104
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote:why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........ I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that.......... I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
I have never been so pissed.
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
Never mind this is supposed to be a 'sandbox". There are a lot of us in the same boat. just get a nice worm and live with that. gone are the days when CCP gives content for experienced players. They takin all our toys and giving them to the noobs or low sec. |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
7870
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.
DMC |

Capt Tenguru10
Nintendo Power Against ALL Authorities
317
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Check my sig for confirmation http://i.imgur.com/EYX5Zi7.gif |

kilteroff
Co-operative Resource Extraction
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yeesh... I missed this in the blogs apparently, I'm a semi-sad panda now. I'd planned on doing all my work in null anyway but..... good to know I guess. :T |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1147
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Haulin Gneiss wrote:They takin all our toys and giving them to the noobs or low sec. This can only be a good thing. Death to high-sec. CCP has no sense of humour. |

Xercodo
Xovoni Astronautical Manufacturing and Engineering
2353
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:23:00 -
[9] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.
DMC
Of course it's not when the thing we're discussing here is PVE
PVE has never been player driven last I checked.
The only close exception being live events such as the sansha raids....but those were hosted by CCP soooo..... The Drake is a Lie |

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
613
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
The perfect irony is with the changes to exploration I no longer need a salvager on my Tengu exploration ship and can fit another missle launcher. Would have loved that for running 4/10's. :)
Time to put the T3 on the shelf for hi sec exploration. Gives me more flexibility for what I put in my alts Orca hangar, so I have that going for me now.... This thread has so much content it may be 'Thread of the Year' and it is only January.
|

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
485
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
T3 were total overkill for those sites. Most T3's didn't even run them, they just followed the triggers to make the good lootsies spawn ASAP and GTFO. I never understood why anyone capable of flying a T3 would stick around in hisec to run these sites anyway. Take your run-of-the-mill MMO and imagine a max-level character grinding mobs in the tutorial area in hopes for a rare spawn. That is what you have been doing, that is what has been taken away from you. And you cry like this? HTFU... |

voetius
L V B Industries STELLAR CONSTELLATION
40
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
people will just switch to using Gila and Ishtar, I guess the only issue there is that they may need to train some skills to use them. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5132
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:35:00 -
[13] - Quote
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:T3 were total overkill for those sites. Most T3's didn't even run them, they just followed the triggers to make the good lootsies spawn ASAP and GTFO. I never understood why anyone capable of flying a T3 would stick around in hisec to run these sites anyway. Take your run-of-the-mill MMO and imagine a max-level character grinding mobs in the tutorial area in hopes for a rare spawn. That is what you have been doing, that is what has been taken away from you. And you cry like this? HTFU... You can still do all that with the ships the sites allow. Nothing has changed in that regard. |

Lexmana
964
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:37:00 -
[14] - Quote
try to leave highsec and there is still plenty of content for your T3. |

Durzel
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
185
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:38:00 -
[15] - Quote
voetius wrote: people will just switch to using Gila and Ishtar, I guess the only issue there is that they may need to train some skills to use them.
If you can fly a Tengu you can fly a Gila, same with Proteus and Ishtar. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5132
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:42:00 -
[16] - Quote
Durzel wrote:voetius wrote: people will just switch to using Gila and Ishtar, I guess the only issue there is that they may need to train some skills to use them.
If you can fly a Tengu you can fly a Gila, same with Proteus and Ishtar. Cerberus propably makes for a nice alternative for tengu users too, since it's another missile spewing ship with an extra utility high. |

Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
347
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
You are not forced to do anything but to adapt. |

Julius Priscus
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:45:00 -
[18] - Quote
do what we used to do before there was t3 ships..
use hacs ,
if ya don't like it... gimmie ya stuff, and transfer ya character/s to one of my accounts.
-»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
169
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 09:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:T3 were total overkill for those sites. Most T3's didn't even run them, they just followed the triggers to make the good lootsies spawn ASAP and GTFO. I never understood why anyone capable of flying a T3 would stick around in hisec to run these sites anyway. Take your run-of-the-mill MMO and imagine a max-level character grinding mobs in the tutorial area in hopes for a rare spawn. That is what you have been doing, that is what has been taken away from you. And you cry like this? HTFU...
Well one of my toons with but a Moa, stumbled on a rare 3/10 spawn. Flew away with a low-slave implant worth more than the ship with everything in it.
But a T3 for that is an overkill. A Moa without even really good skills can take a rare 3/10 spawn out and the associated waves. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

FlamesOfHeaven
Phantom Fenix
37
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 10:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Player driven event for PVE... lol |

MisterNick
The Sagan Clan Pax Romana Alliance
240
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 10:29:00 -
[21] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote:I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP
How can you avoid a huge part of the game for so long? 
"Human beings make life so interesting. Do you know that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom." |

Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 10:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:T3 were total overkill for those sites. Most people used T3's simply because of the scanning bonus on a combat ship.
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:Most T3's didn't even run them, they just followed the triggers to make the good lootsies spawn ASAP and GTFO. Does that mean "blitzing" missions is not really running missions either? Anyway removing T3's won't stop blitzing sites.
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:I never understood why anyone capable of flying a T3 would stick around in hisec to run these sites anyway. Because they are PROFITABLE. The CAPS probably didn't even show how profitable they are. In which point we get to the OP part. The drops of ded3/4's are OP.
On a side note, I don't understand the "Don't run these sites, they're meant for newer players". Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites"
PS: I believe newer players are getting the short end of the stick, since vets will run sites as fast in HACs as they did in T3's. Yet, new players will lose the "easy accessable T3's to run sites quickly themselves", and HACs are (much?) more skill intensive. |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
1161
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 10:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
The Gnosis most of us received (at least one), fit for exploration and sites is an excellent ship for 3/10 and 4/10. Perfect for these sites along with probing and hacking.
T3 was total overkill on 3/10 and 4/10.
Personnel Division Director --áBene Gesserit Chapterhouse "The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another." - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
New Eden Asteroid Preservation Society
2994
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:23:00 -
[24] - Quote
There have been ship restrictions on gates since I started playing three years ago. CCP simply modified them. Don't act like this is "the end of the sandbox."
Personally, I think they should have left 4/10s open to T3s, as they are the top end of of highsec exploration. Lowering the number of accessible sites and funneling all the pro explorers into a smaller number of sites would have created the pressure to push some of them into lowsec anyway. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
165
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 11:32:00 -
[25] - Quote
Oh yes the glorious tears I never ran them anyway, i just used a tengu to steal other people's loot by shooting the faction before they could 
DeMichael Crimson wrote:I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.
DMC
Its a bit difficult to hold true to a player driven universe when there is a ship in the game that is a swiss army knife and pretty much can do anything better then other ships. |

Signal11th
The Retirement Club
980
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote:why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........ I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that.......... I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
I have never been so pissed.
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
This has been CCP's mantra from the beginning find something you like doing on your own and burn it to the ground or force you to do it in a group. You will get used to it eventually. God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster. |

Ylariana
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:47:00 -
[27] - Quote
The people who blitzed these sites in T3s are already just moving to other ships. I've already had Ishtar cruisers sweep on by me while I clear my way to the end of a site (you know, actually RUNNING the site instead of cherry picking). They force extra spawns on some gates, warp on through leaving me to deal with the extra rats, blow up the pinata, loot the cherry then swan off to do the same elsewhere.
Blocking T3s just moved them into other ships.
Removing the cherry from the site would hurt everyone be they Vet or Newbie, as this would simply make the site not worth the hassle to run for most people since the bounties and scrap loot take so much longer to gather.
I run the sites in smaller ships because I enjoy the challenge of trying to complete them in the smallest ship possible while still being semi efficient. I find I learn more about flying a ship if i'm actually in danger of losing it *shrug* It would be nice if people would stop ignoring the early room trash, or even, gods forbid, leave the site if its already being run, but, hand-on-heart I know that that will never happen, and I fully expect to be flamed for even voicing the suggestion.
Its annoying to have people Cherry Pop the site, but I live with it and just try to clear it faster myself.
Trying to prevent it happening by blocking X Y or Z ship class will just end with people doing the same lowlife thing in a different ship. Its a sandbox after all, and since "If you can, you should" is how a lot of people prefer to play the game...... |

Spurty
V0LTA Verge of Collapse
874
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:48:00 -
[28] - Quote
Even a sandbox has walls
That or "why can't I use my NYX in 3/10!!!!"
--- GÇ£If you think this Universe is bad, you should see some of the others.GÇ¥ GÇò Philip K. **** |

Van Hiaasen
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 12:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote:why? this change makes no sense to me.
Because T3's are far overpowered for any content you will find in high security space. You are talking about a ship that can fly cloaked, can be bubble-immune, can tank thousands of DPS and dish out hundreds, all while remaining mobile and small and fast and having all your exploration equipment. Why waste all that power and ability on crappy little high sec sites? Get out to low and null, have fun, make real isk.
Copper Rei wrote:I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
So go do solo exploration in low sec. I don't see the issue here. I survived well on low sec exploration from around 6 months into the game until around 3 years into the game before moving on. Its fun. Nothing is stopping you, literally nothing, from doing solo exploration.
Copper Rei wrote:I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
Great so whats the issue again? That you cant take your high level incredibly powerful ship into pissy little easy high sec sites?
Copper Rei wrote:This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
Im sure it does indeed suck your ass.
Copper Rei wrote:I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
ALL your training is out the window? So now that you cant do high sec DED sites you literally cant do ANYTHING in this game? You sound like a child sweeping a game off the table and shouting 'Im not playing the whole game is RUINED!!!' because of one little thing and going to sulk somewhere. Seriously quit the game man, if this is your attitude, we would probably be better without you
|

J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
808
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 13:18:00 -
[30] - Quote
It was becoming a joke seeing 3 or 4 tengus competing in a 4/10, now the jokes on them as they sit on the gate in their 6 month old tengu pilot unable to get in. Ah tengu tears are the finest quality  This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.-á Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless |

Murk Paradox
Red Tsunami The Cursed Few
389
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 13:40:00 -
[31] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:Quiet simply T3s were too OP for those sites
Because using subsystems that have bonuses to scanning would be unheard of to use that same ship to fly into the site =( "I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC."-á -TheGunslinger42 Proud enforcer of the Code, see [url]http://www.minerbumping.com[/url]-á for details. |

Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
3
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 14:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ylariana wrote:(you know, actually RUNNING the site instead of cherry picking).
I understand what you mean, but cherry picking is refered to as using DPS to only scan possible DED4's.
Exploration in high sec is all about competition. It *IS* part of exploration. If someone enters "your" site (since it's in no way your site) and you are in high sec you lose the loot, in low sec you die.
This also makes the Gnosis a bad choice imo, as it's slow as ****. |

UKBigWolf
20
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 15:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Surely the solution is, instead of further restricting what ships can be used, they should simply alter the triggers to prevent blitzing A few examples * The loot pi+¦ata only shows once ALL ships & trigger structures have been destroyed * It has insane repping powers until all triggers are killed meaning it adds to incoming dps, but effectively can't be killed until it's alone * It will never drop faction gear if killed before everythingthing else (opens up exploration to creating even more tears ;) )
Lets be honest, a HAC/faction cruiser runs them as quick (I've seen people do them in AFs as well), the only real change this create for some will be to use a 2nd account to scan instead of all-in-one ships If anything, it can be argued, it simply means more training/isk before you can blitz them like before, which puts the advantage even more into veteran's hands |

Haulie Berry
900
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 15:58:00 -
[34] - Quote
The only problem I have with this is that it apparently applies to 4/10s in low sec, as well. |

Derdrom Utida
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
51
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 16:07:00 -
[35] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites"
Stop right there.
It isn't reward balancing.
People just don't want to run the *risk* of losing their ships. It isn't about loot distribution, it isn't about being entitled to do X because you have Y sp. It's because people want super-shiny loot with as little risk, and as little effort as possible. Don't even try to pretend it isn't about that.
EDIT: This only applies in hi-sec. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8134
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 16:50:00 -
[36] - Quote
If you have the vaguest clue what you're doing you can take a T3 to solo lowsec/nullsec exploration sites for a lot more ISK. Stop worrying about the big bad piwate gate camps: it's not as if they have bubbles in lowsec. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5135
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 17:05:00 -
[37] - Quote
Derdrom Utida wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites" Stop right there. It isn't reward balancing. People just don't want to run the *risk* of losing their ships. It isn't about loot distribution, it isn't about being entitled to do X because you have Y sp. It's because people want super-shiny loot with as little risk, and as little effort as possible. Don't even try to pretend it isn't about that. EDIT: This only applies in hi-sec. It's also about the intensity of the gaming experience. From my perspective the best thing about highsec PvE is that you don't have to remain alert and tense all the time. No cat and mouse games with locals or roaming gangs, no directional scanner spamming, running gate camps and no scouting and traveling by your personal safespot network. You can actually enjoy the game casually for once doing an activity you like in exchage for a reduced reward level. Increased income is nice, but it's just one thing among many, that decide where and how people spend their time in the game. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8134
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 17:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
I do love the fact that you have dudes running highsec exploration sites in T3s to rob newbies of their income. Then when their T3s get suicide ganked for their shiny mods they'll whine on the forums about how suicide gankers are destroying the game and driving new players away Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
373
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 17:12:00 -
[39] - Quote
Andski wrote:I do love the fact that you have dudes running highsec exploration sites in T3s to rob newbies from their income. Then when their T3s get suicide ganked for their shiny mods they'll whine on the forums about how suicide gankers are destroying the game and driving new players away
pains me to +1 andski but yeah p much
3/10s and 4/10s arent meant for oyu scrubs to go around ALL of high sec speed running every single noob plex.
How about you just go to 0.0 or low sec and stop being 'giners |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2844
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 17:40:00 -
[40] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote:why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........ I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that.......... I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
I have never been so pissed.
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
Hello OP.
Back in the days of yor, I used to run 4/10s with a T1 BC fit for exploration. This was before the T3 cruisers proliferated.
Eventually, it got to a point where you could go into a 4/10 and find a Tengue (usually a Tengue) tanking all of the rats and taking out the boss.
This would "spike" after the bot-hunts as some nullsec corporations would cool their heels in hisec. (Probably could not pay their rent after their botters got banned).
When I brought this up in the Exploration chat, I got yelled at most ferociously, as if I recommended that people should consider eating babies or something.
The deep dark secret is that you can blitz 4/10 in hisec in less than a minute with a T3. This has been a problem for a while now, since 2010.
And a lot of people, afraid of going to lowsec or null, were doing it.
So, something became easy mode, and people were abusing it - and also lied about it too.
As far as I'm concerned, a lot of people getting PO'ed by this probably deserve it.
Eventually I adapted and took my BC to nullsec and started hitting exploration sites there, where none of these blitzing Tengues could be found. I never encountered anybody else because I used a lot of intel to avoid contact. So there should be plenty of room for your T3.
Good luck. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2844
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 17:58:00 -
[41] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Derdrom Utida wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites" Stop right there. It isn't reward balancing. People just don't want to run the *risk* of losing their ships. It isn't about loot distribution, it isn't about being entitled to do X because you have Y sp. It's because people want super-shiny loot with as little risk, and as little effort as possible. Don't even try to pretend it isn't about that. EDIT: This only applies in hi-sec. It's also about the intensity of the gaming experience. From my perspective the best thing about highsec PvE is that you don't have to remain alert and tense all the time. No cat and mouse games with locals or roaming gangs, no directional scanner spamming, running gate camps and no scouting and traveling by your personal safespot network. You can actually enjoy the game casually for once doing an activity you like in exchage for a reduced reward level. Increased income is nice, but it's just one thing among many, that decide where and how people spend their time in the game.
Pro Tip:
Use wormholes to get to deep null, past the gank pipelines and renter staffed gate camps, and you can spend weeks out there without seeing another ship.
I do it in an exploration-fit Tech 1 BC.
People with Tech 3 crying about this change are making my sh!t itch.
|

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1416
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 18:22:00 -
[42] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:The Gnosis most of us received (at least one), fit for exploration and sites is an excellent ship for 4/10. Perfect for these sites along with probing and hacking.
T3 was total overkill on 3/10 and 4/10.
Gnosis is a BC, FTFY |

Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth
254
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 21:51:00 -
[43] - Quote
I vote they don't outright ban t3's but instead, the site is filled with a cloud that damages and destroys t3's in a matter of seconds. Taking a T3 into a 4/4 is the equivalent of hot dropping a full fleet of carriers into a level 2 mission. Either accept making a bit less in hi-sec or making more in low and null at the risk of being blown up. |

Derdrom Utida
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
52
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 22:25:00 -
[44] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Derdrom Utida wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites" Stop right there. It isn't reward balancing. People just don't want to run the *risk* of losing their ships. It isn't about loot distribution, it isn't about being entitled to do X because you have Y sp. It's because people want super-shiny loot with as little risk, and as little effort as possible. Don't even try to pretend it isn't about that. EDIT: This only applies in hi-sec. It's also about the intensity of the gaming experience. From my perspective the best thing about highsec PvE is that you don't have to remain alert and tense all the time. No cat and mouse games with locals or roaming gangs, no directional scanner spamming, running gate camps and no scouting and traveling by your personal safespot network. You can actually enjoy the game casually for once doing an activity you like in exchage for a reduced reward level. Increased income is nice, but it's just one thing among many, that decide where and how people spend their time in the game.
You're absolutely allowed to play the game in the way in which you want to. Hi-sec still exists, and it will continue to exist. But you shouldn't be making "good" ISK when you have a ship that simply tears apart anything you throw it at. It's not healthy for the game.
Hell, with Tags4Sec and the new explo, I feel low-sec should STILL be buffed, but that's just because I'm biased. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
784
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 22:27:00 -
[45] - Quote
Haulin Gneiss wrote:Copper Rei wrote:why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........ I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that.......... I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
I have never been so pissed.
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
Never mind this is supposed to be a 'sandbox". There are a lot of us in the same boat. just get a nice worm and live with that. gone are the days when CCP gives content for experienced players. They takin all our toys and giving them to the noobs or low sec.
Strategic cruisers are meant to be versatile, which some are and most precisely Tengu followed very closely by Loki.
For exploration you can't just spit in the air how op those are and forget about the essential, those are minor sites requiring cruiser sized hulls and I do agree these T3's are rather good to clean those sites.
Now tell us all about exploration and how you tank/DPS your 10/10 with your lonely Tengu fitted for exploration. You can't ! So in the end are those OP or not OP?
The answer is quite simple, you're using a fantastic tool to clean sites not requiring anything else than a regular T1 or T2 ship version, if something you should ask for a T1 cruiser hull with bonus for this, not say strategic cruisers are OP because it's false, it's only your perception from your experience in small minor exploration sites.
Again the problem is not T3's but the lack of a cheaper exploration ship cruiser sized in between T1/T2 exploration frigates and T3's exploration subs.
Will that be all? -ok you can send me 1B for this enlightenment. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
784
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 22:38:00 -
[46] - Quote
Derdrom Utida wrote:You're absolutely allowed to play the game in the way in which you want to. Hi-sec still exists, and it will continue to exist. But you shouldn't be making "good" ISK when you have a ship that simply tears apart anything you throw it at. It's not healthy for the game.
Hell, with Tags4Sec and the new explo, I feel low-sec should STILL be buffed, but that's just because I'm biased.
Are you kidding?
You're kidding right?
Tell me more about Faction fitted Machariels/Vindicators/Nightmares/Rattlesnakes Gilas Navy ships and other pimp stuff that should be banned from high sec too.
From your point of view players in high sec should fly with T1 frigates and cruisers only? -because that's what you're implying since T3's are not what you're talking about or at least you've never flown a 3K+DPS Machariel/Vindicator able to clean entire sanctums in less than 20min, leave it alone lvl4's.
You're finding problems where there aren't any, it's players actions and the content they crate for themselves. Someone tells you to do it in a T3? -I don't think so, I don't think neither it's in the EULA, don't like it? don't use it Make your own content, build your own gaming tools, this is the finest freedom you have available in Eve, you shape yourself your gaming world. Hell go run lvl4's in a retriever or a T2 frigate if you like, the problems you might find is not tools available but players horrible thinking.
Edit because it's worth: low sec doesn't need more buffs, just needs better thinking players over there. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8143
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 22:52:00 -
[47] - Quote
actually the eula does prevent you from getting a T3 into a 3/4/10 since the only way you'd have one in there is if you're exploiting Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
785
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 23:02:00 -
[48] - Quote
Andski wrote:actually the eula does prevent you from getting a T3 into a 3/4/10 since the only way you'd have one in there is if you're exploiting
The entire point being OP is delivering tears and rage for peanuts, believe me I've made huge efforts to not troll this (harder)
 *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Derdrom Utida
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
52
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 23:03:00 -
[49] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Derdrom Utida wrote:You're absolutely allowed to play the game in the way in which you want to. Hi-sec still exists, and it will continue to exist. But you shouldn't be making "good" ISK when you have a ship that simply tears apart anything you throw it at. It's not healthy for the game.
Hell, with Tags4Sec and the new explo, I feel low-sec should STILL be buffed, but that's just because I'm biased. Are you kidding? You're kidding right? Tell me more about Faction fitted Machariels/Vindicators/Nightmares/Rattlesnakes Gilas Navy ships and other pimp stuff that should be banned from high sec too. From your point of view players in high sec should fly with T1 frigates and cruisers only? -because that's what you're implying since T3's are not what you're talking about or at least you've never flown a 3K+DPS Machariel/Vindicator able to clean entire sanctums in less than 20min, leave it alone lvl4's. You're finding problems where there aren't any, it's players actions and the content they crate for themselves. Someone tells you to do it in a T3? -I don't think so, I don't think neither it's in the EULA, don't like it? don't use it Make your own content, build your own gaming tools, this is the finest freedom you have available in Eve, you shape yourself your gaming world. Hell go run lvl4's in a retriever or a T2 frigate if you like, the problems you might find is not tools available but players horrible thinking. Edit because it's worth: low sec doesn't need more buffs, just needs better thinking players over there.
No one's stopping people from running 3 and 4/10 DED's with Gila's or other blingy ships. CCP agrees with my sentiment that there was a problem because they nerfed specifically T3's in those DED's. Bringing strategic cruisers into lowbie sites isn't this genius idea that only idiots don't do, it's what everyone did, and thus, warranted the nerf.
Level 4's shouldn't even be in this discussion because they can't be solo'd in a Caracal, unlike 3/4 DED's.
EDIT: Spelling |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
785
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 23:24:00 -
[50] - Quote
Derdrom Utida wrote: No one's stopping people from running 3 and 4/10 DED's with Gila's or other blingy ships. CCP agrees with my sentiment that there was a problem because they nerfed specifically T3's in those DED's. Bringing strategic cruisers into lowbie sites isn't this genius idea that only idiots don't do, it's what everyone did, and thus, warranted the nerf.
Level 4's shouldn't even be in this discussion because they can't be solo'd in a Caracal, unlike 3/4 DED's.
EDIT: Spelling
I understand you point of view, thing is that by that logic CCP are not being logic, what about ban from lvl4's Marauders/Navy ships/Pirate ships?
By that logic then why not ban T2 links/OGB and T2 mining ships from high sec?-those have a well known huge impact
By that logic again why not ban from high sec POSs?-those clearly have a huge impact
It's exactly the same problems but a lot bigger and having a greater impact than T3's running 3/4 anoms, instead of fixing anom difficulty or the mechanic it's easier and faster to script ban an item, and this is silly. *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14588
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 23:30:00 -
[51] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:I understand you point of view, thing is that by that logic CCP are not being logic, what about ban from lvl4's Marauders/Navy ships/Pirate ships?
By that logic then why not ban T2 links/OGB and T2 mining ships from high sec?-those have a well known huge impact
By that logic again why not ban from high sec POSs?-those clearly have a huge impact Because none of those have any ship restrictions that are put into place to ensure that you can't utterly steam-roll them with something that so ridiculously outmatches the content.
It's entirely logical that the restrictions for one type of content do not apply to a completely different type of content sinceGǪ you knowGǪ it's a different type of content. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Derdrom Utida
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
52
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 23:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Derdrom Utida wrote: No one's stopping people from running 3 and 4/10 DED's with Gila's or other blingy ships. CCP agrees with my sentiment that there was a problem because they nerfed specifically T3's in those DED's. Bringing strategic cruisers into lowbie sites isn't this genius idea that only idiots don't do, it's what everyone did, and thus, warranted the nerf.
Level 4's shouldn't even be in this discussion because they can't be solo'd in a Caracal, unlike 3/4 DED's.
EDIT: Spelling
I understand you point of view, thing is that by that logic CCP are not being logic, what about ban from lvl4's Marauders/Navy ships/Pirate ships? By that logic then why not ban T2 links/OGB and T2 mining ships from high sec?-those have a well known huge impact By that logic again why not ban from high sec POSs?-those clearly have a huge impact It's exactly the same problems but a lot bigger and having a greater impact than T3's running 3/4 anoms, instead of fixing anom difficulty or the mechanic it's easier and faster to script ban an item, and this is silly.
It's as if you're implying CCP hates your freedom and ingenuity and seeks to ruin your fun.
All they did was not allow a beastly monster of a scanning/clearing combo ship to enter lowbie sites. |

Koz Katral
L'Avant Garde
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 00:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
Hisec exploration is boring and dull and you shouldn't do it. CCP has done you a favour. |

Copper Rei
Copper Corp
36
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:31:00 -
[54] - Quote
There is so much to say but I won't bother to say too much since it will fall on deaf ears anyway.
I would like to point out that I do have a toon in null sec. I use him for mining and pos defence for the alliance that supports me in my exploration of null sec.
I have had toons in militia for over a year before finially giving that up since I pretty much sucked at it.
I have had POS in worm space for six months or so...right up to the point that CCP changed the fuel cells and the customs offices and cut all profits from that operation to almost zero.
I found many good people in game and I enjoy playing with them.
High sec space is where this particular toon stays. I have always tried to make the best of the sites I have found. I run them and have fun doing it. I do not steal and I will always try to help people in local. I take time to offer gravs to miners in local and to offer any and all wrecks WITH loots to new players who are willing to fleet and come salvage. I ask nothing in return.
I have given away many of my finds including ships.
There are many people who know me and know this to be true.
I just play a different game than the majority here.
I have another main toon on another account that has built up skills to manufacture t3 and has been doing so for a short while. More time wasted.
This 'nerf' has hurt in many ways. I was not ranting to rant. I honestly think that exploration changes were needed but not to the extent of destroying what the exploration career was all about. They have made it into something else and it is not good. |

Tea Leaves
Abyssus Spatium Exploratorium The Big Dirty
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 01:54:00 -
[55] - Quote
OH NOES. Well guess what, now nobody else can use T3's in your precious 4/10 farm either. This levels the playing field for everyone in high sec. If you don't like. Feel free to biomass yourself and give somebody your stuff. |

tanju1982
Sons of Ivaldi Zero Hour Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 02:48:00 -
[56] - Quote
So after reading all the posts and reply's something has occurred to me. No one has yet to acknowledge the fact that some, not all, but at least some of the 4/10 sites have the ability to brake the tank of even the toughest T3's.
Now i know some of you out there are immediately going to say when you must not have a good fit for your T3.. You may be right. so i would invite you to link me a fit that get better then 890 dps (hams), 1400 active repping tank, and goes faster then 1200ms. (YOU HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED)
Now considering those spec for a simple high-sec lvl 4 mission and exploration **** you would think it would sweep the floor with all high sec sites. In most cases it does. Yet there have been a few 4/10 sites in which the speed at which my ships ability clear the field or burn off from the npcs has been the difference between living to collect the loot or dieing in a ball of fire.
I tell you this not because I am some how pissed at the changes or feel slighted by CCP for making the changes they did. in the end i only run the sight on occasion and just for fun. I've been playing the game long enough to find another ship to use or something else to pass my time.
I tell you this because if players with nearly 9 yrs of EVE game play, flying ships that filled with bling have troubles somethings; what will happen the genuinely new players who are most likely barely able to fly there T1/ cruisers and BC's ( even if they are faction) going to do in these sights?
After all they are intended to new players right? That is the argument on why T3's have to be banned.. |

Ris Dnalor
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
493
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 03:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote:why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........ I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that.......... I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.
I have never been so pissed.
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.
If you find an easy button ( and yes, to be clear, I'm saying that's what this was. ) You should enjoy the ever-luvin-**** out of it while it lasts, because it will go away. Also, tell noone about your easy button, as that will ensure it goes away faster.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

Ylariana
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 06:06:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:Ylariana wrote:(you know, actually RUNNING the site instead of cherry picking). I understand what you mean, but cherry picking is refered to as using DPS to only scan possible DED4's. Exploration in high sec is all about competition. It *IS* part of exploration. If someone enters "your" site (since it's in no way your site) and you are in high sec you lose the loot, in low sec you die. This also makes the Gnosis a bad choice imo, as it's slow as ****.
At no point in my post did I claim any right to ownership. What I referred to was more a point of manners and courtesy. If someone else is already running a site, I leave. Manners and Courtesy.
If someone else is running a site and you choose to blow past them to the shiny drop container at the end, that's Greed and Selfishness.
See the difference ?
Cant believe I actually had to spell that out
|

Mnemosyne Gloob
Acerbus Vindictum Stealth Wear Inc.
102
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 07:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCP saw something going on in highsec exploration. They saw it involved (mostly) tengus and also deep space probes. They fixed it.
Now - they could have done better, because tengus were not the problem, nor were deep space probes (well they were, because people are lazy), but they did something! Could have done better, but at least they did something. |

baltec1
Bat Country
6841
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 07:34:00 -
[60] - Quote
Cant wait for the t3 nerfs. |

Castor II
Black Dragon Fighting Society The Devil's Tattoo
97
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 07:36:00 -
[61] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.
DMC
Talk about over-reacting 
God you people are terrible sometimes |

Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 11:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
Tea Leaves wrote:OH NOES. Well guess what, now nobody else can use T3's in your precious 4/10 farm either. This levels the playing field for everyone in high sec. If you don't like. Feel free to biomass yourself and give somebody your stuff.
People will use HACs instead of T3's, so the speed of completing sites won't lower. If someone can pass you in a T3, he will pass you in a HAC. This means new players will be at a disadvantage for longer because HACs are more skill intensive!
This update removed simply made making good money in high sec more annoying. A "vet" will still be faster than you, and dual boxing explorers now also have the advantage in high sec.
To make it clear, this is no problem for me personally, so it's not a personal little whine.. I have a cov ops alt, and a main that can fly HACs.
It's pretty simple imo:
High sec: Courrier trading: High skills -> More cargo room -> More profit. Manufacturing: High skills -> Better margin -> More profit. Mission running: High skills -> Faster completion times -> More profit.
Combat exploration: High skills -> Good combat + scan ship -> More profit ==> Turned into: High skills -> Cov ops + HAC -> More profit, but alot more annoying than before
|

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
790
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 11:52:00 -
[63] - Quote
Derdrom Utida wrote:It's as if you're implying CCP hates your freedom and ingenuity and seeks to ruin your fun.
All they did was not allow a beastly monster of a scanning/clearing combo ship to enter lowbie sites.
I'm not implying whatever, just note that T3's in 3 and 4 sites steamroll on them like typia says but actually Machariels and vindicators at 3k+dps don't steamroll on lvl4's.
CCP buff Machariels and Vindicators plz  *removed inappropriate ASCII art signature* - CCP Eterne |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14599
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:05:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:People will use HACs instead of T3's, so the speed of completing sites won't lower. If someone can pass you in a T3, he will pass you in a HAC. This means new players will be at a disadvantage for longer because HACs are more skill intensive! Not really, no.
Both require cruiser V and a smattering of basic support skills that you want to IV or V anyway no matter what ship you fly.
HAC: 10 ranks to V, 3 ranks to IV. SC: 10 ranks to V, 2 ranks to III.
The difference amounts to a rounding error. If you can fly a T3 competently, switching to HAC is a matter of injecting the HAC skillbook and waiting a few minutes. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:37:00 -
[65] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:People will use HACs instead of T3's, so the speed of completing sites won't lower. If someone can pass you in a T3, he will pass you in a HAC. This means new players will be at a disadvantage for longer because HACs are more skill intensive! Not really, no. Both require cruiser V and a smattering of basic support skills that you want to IV or V anyway no matter what ship you fly. HAC: 10 ranks to V, 3 ranks to IV. SC: 10 ranks to V, 2 ranks to III. The difference amounts to a rounding error. If you can fly a T3 competently, switching to HAC is a matter of injecting the HAC skillbook and waiting a few minutes.
So what you are saying is that a T3 fitted for PvE is no better than a HAC fitted for PvE? |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
497
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:41:00 -
[66] - Quote
Andski wrote:I do love the fact that you have dudes running highsec exploration sites in T3s to rob newbies of their income. Then when their T3s get suicide ganked for their shiny mods they'll whine on the forums about how suicide gankers are destroying the game and driving new players away
I didn't think of this at all... you make a very good point! Regarding your comment on the spawn mechanics of these sites and 'blitzing' them: you are totally right about that. I don't think it's a bad thing to be able to blitz in principle though. The point mainly was that those flying T3's have a machine capable of running far better content (low/null anoms, Sleeper sites), but are scared to do so because -gasp- they will have to leave hisec. Instead they replay level 1 to farm the boss over and over. I mean... it just looks pathetic and risk-averse to me.  |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2044
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
Castor II wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.
DMC Talk about over-reacting  God you people are terrible sometimes all the damn time
I'm on a fixing spree!
|

baltec1
Bat Country
6850
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:44:00 -
[68] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:
So what you are saying is that a T3 fitted for PvE is no better than a HAC fitted for PvE?
No Tippia is saying what the skill difference is... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14599
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:45:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:So what you are saying is that a T3 fitted for PvE is no better than a HAC fitted for PvE? Count the number of times I use the word GÇ£fitGÇ¥ and strawman again.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2045
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:46:00 -
[70] - Quote
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:T3 were total overkill for those sites. Most T3's didn't even run them, they just followed the triggers to make the good lootsies spawn ASAP and GTFO. I never understood why anyone capable of flying a T3 would stick around in hisec to run these sites anyway. Take your run-of-the-mill MMO and imagine a max-level character grinding mobs in the tutorial area in hopes for a rare spawn. That is what you have been doing, that is what has been taken away from you. And you cry like this? HTFU...
That's...perfect. Well said.
Tech3 ships should have never been allowed in such sites to begin with, the crying now is simply from people who got spoiled by CCPs initial mistake. It's "high sec level 5s" all over again lol.
|

Julius Priscus
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:46:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:Tippia wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:People will use HACs instead of T3's, so the speed of completing sites won't lower. If someone can pass you in a T3, he will pass you in a HAC. This means new players will be at a disadvantage for longer because HACs are more skill intensive! Not really, no. Both require cruiser V and a smattering of basic support skills that you want to IV or V anyway no matter what ship you fly. HAC: 10 ranks to V, 3 ranks to IV. SC: 10 ranks to V, 2 ranks to III. The difference amounts to a rounding error. If you can fly a T3 competently, switching to HAC is a matter of injecting the HAC skillbook and waiting a few minutes. So what you are saying is that a T3 fitted for PvE is no better than a HAC fitted for PvE?
back in the day people would ***** that hac's in 3/10 were over kill. imo T3 in 3/10 were murderous.
just jump into a hac and do the high sec site. if ya gotta brign a good scanning buddie along. once he has scanned the site down he goes back for a 2nd hac and you both do em in hacs.
-»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |

Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:46:00 -
[72] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:
So what you are saying is that a T3 fitted for PvE is no better than a HAC fitted for PvE?
No Tippia is saying what the skill difference is...
Yes well I thought it was clear that I don't mean the skill difference in training time (since it's nearly the same, as Tippia showed, but the fact that you need better skills to do it in a HAC. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14600
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:49:00 -
[73] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:Yes well I thought it was clear that I don't mean the skill difference in training time Jonas Staal wrote:This means new players will be at a disadvantage for longer because HACs are more skill intensive! Really? Really?
Quote:but the fact that you need better skills to do it in a HAC No, you don't. You need base skills that are the same, as showed, and support skills that are the same, since it's the same type and size of ship. The difference in GÇ£skill intensityGÇ¥ is zero. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Julius Priscus
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:52:00 -
[74] - Quote
Jonas Staal wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jonas Staal wrote:
So what you are saying is that a T3 fitted for PvE is no better than a HAC fitted for PvE?
No Tippia is saying what the skill difference is... Yes well I thought it was clear that I don't mean the skill difference in training time (since it's nearly the same, as Tippia showed, but the fact that you need better skills to do it in a HAC.
no.. all T3 required you to have base skills at 5.
hac's don't.
you can be in a hac in about the same time it takes to skill up for a t3 -»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2045
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 12:58:00 -
[75] - Quote
With all the tears on the forum, who needs suicide ganking?  |

baltec1
Bat Country
6850
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 13:02:00 -
[76] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:With all the tears on the forum, who needs suicide ganking? 
I think we will still go ahead to see how muc land we can flood. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2046
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 13:06:00 -
[77] - Quote
[quote=Jonas Staal] This means new players will be at a disadvantage for longer because HACs are more skill intensive!
This is the EVE version of "Think of the children!".
|

Doddy
Dark-Rising
852
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 13:21:00 -
[78] - Quote
[quote=Sergeant Acht Scultz][quote=Haulin Gneiss][quote=Copper Rei] Now tell us all about exploration and how you tank/DPS your 10/10 with your lonely Tengu fitted for exploration. You can't ! So in the end are those OP or not OP?
quote]
Well maybe YOU can't.  |

Callic Veratar
Power of the Phoenix
373
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 15:22:00 -
[79] - Quote
A corp mate and I were fooling around with exploration. We found a system that had a 4/10 site.
Entered the first one, cleared the first room, and hit the gate. Shortly after landing a tengu decloaks, aggroes the whole room, flies full speed at the loot ship, pops it and warps off in less than 45s. Repeat for 3 more sites in the same afternoon with several different tengu pilots.
That's why. DirectX 11, it's not rocket appliance! |

Julius Priscus
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 15:27:00 -
[80] - Quote
Callic Veratar wrote:A corp mate and I were fooling around with exploration. We found a system that had a 4/10 site.
Entered the first one, cleared the first room, and hit the gate. Shortly after landing a tengu decloaks, aggroes the whole room, flies full speed at the loot ship, pops it and warps off in less than 45s. Repeat for 3 more sites in the same afternoon with several different tengu pilots.
That's why.
when I used to do the serpentise drug warehouse back in the day. In the final room i would get full room agro sit next to who ever was in the last room with me then log out... then log right back in. that pilot would then have agro. usually they would warp off.
but once word got around what I was doing some would log off as well and try to get me to get agro.
basically... all is fair in complex's and grieving :P -»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |

Zircon Dasher
208
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 15:58:00 -
[81] - Quote
Callic Veratar wrote:A corp mate and I were fooling around with exploration. We found a system that had a 4/10 site.
Entered the first one, cleared the first room, and hit the gate. Shortly after landing a tengu decloaks, aggroes the whole room, flies full speed at the loot ship, pops it and warps off in less than 45s. Repeat for 3 more sites in the same afternoon with several different tengu pilots.
That's why.
So what you are saying is that someone took the time to bypass the first room and then cloak up just so he could jump out of the bushes and clear the site out from under noobs.....the same site he could have finished god-knows how much sooner if he had just done the site.
Tell me- do you happen to whine a lot in local when someone "steals" your site? Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'. |

Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 16:08:00 -
[82] - Quote
Callic Veratar wrote:A corp mate and I were fooling around with exploration. We found a system that had a 4/10 site.
Entered the first one, cleared the first room, and hit the gate. Shortly after landing a tengu decloaks, aggroes the whole room, flies full speed at the loot ship, pops it and warps off in less than 45s. Repeat for 3 more sites in the same afternoon with several different tengu pilots.
That's why.
That's only because the reward is insane. |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Villore Accords
102
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 17:39:00 -
[83] - Quote
For all of those saying you should be able to play the game your way - NO! You should not. This is a sandbox MMO and anyone can interfere with your gameplay. You don't like that? Then go play something else. |

Royal Executioner Shazih
Viziam Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.06 18:24:00 -
[84] - Quote
Please make sure you post here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3139076#post3139076 |

Copper Rei
Copper Corp
38
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 00:22:00 -
[85] - Quote
'WHY I LIKED MY T3'
Not because it was OP or could steamroll anything.
I liked it because of the fitting options. Sure you can fit them to be incredible ships for specific purposes but they were also able to be fit for 'multi' purpose. As with any multi-purpose tool, the more you try to make it do the worse it was for specific tasks. For actual exploration this was actually a benefit.
I have been trying to find a replacement for my T3 and have not come close. The Gnosis is nearly there but they made it a BC and it is slow with a huge sig rad. The bonuses on my particular fit were crazy nice at first glance but when you really look close it isn't as overkill as you may think.
10% probe scan strength (weak compared to the Gnosis and same as cov ops) +10 Virus strength to both analyzers (not available on other ships) 99% reduction for probe launchers (like a cov ops but without cloak bonuses too) 4% to all armor resists (4% isn't much overall since my fit had dual reps and not a lot of low slots) 5% to CAP capacity (made dual reps possible with t2 cap rigs it was stable) 7.5% to med projectile ROF (not as high as other ships and I was fitting probe launcher and salvager so only 4 weapons) 10% to falloff (great for autocannons but not so much for arty so this helped fit for shorter range) 5% to max velocity 6H w/6 Turrets (but only 4 after fitting salvager and probe launcher) 5M (only 3 after fitting codebreaker and analyzer) 5L with my skills it was base armor of 92%EM,73%TH,37%KIN,25%EXP which is perfect for bloods and sansha Cap 1908GJ/271s Targeting range of 62.5 ( which only helped drones since I had to fit autocannons) base speed of 285ms (typical cruiser speed not super speedy) 50 m3 drone bay power grid 1375 CPU 418.8
A nice jack of all trades and master of none. Like me.
|

Copper Rei
Copper Corp
38
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 00:27:00 -
[86] - Quote
That's only because the reward is insane.[/quote]
The best item you could get from a 4/10 in blood space was a c-type med armor repper that sold for 160 mil.
Maybe a energized c-type adaptive but that depended on the markets for which was worth more at the time.
Hardly insane.
Step into l-sec and run a 7/10 and you can get a nice 1 bil drop.
The rewards from escelations can easily be far greater than any 4/10 DED.
Incursions pay better. Militia pays better.
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
7972
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 19:35:00 -
[87] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.
DMC Of course it's not when the thing we're discussing here is PVE PVE has never been player driven last I checked. The only close exception being live events such as the sansha raids....but those were hosted by CCP soooo..... Wrong, doesn't matter if it's PvP or PvE. The whole point is that CCP creates the content and supplies the tools which we (the playerbase) decide how we're going to use it.
The fact that T3's are no longer allowed by CCP actually validates my original statement.
DMC |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14648
|
Posted - 2013.06.07 19:43:00 -
[88] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Wrong, doesn't matter if it's PvP or PvE. The whole point is that CCP creates the content and supplies the tools which we (the playerbase) decide how we're going to use it. GǪand part of that content GÇö such as DED sites GÇö come supplied with limitations as to which tools are supposed to be used when doing them. Shifting these limitations around to match changes done to the game does not alter the level of player-driven:ness.
Quote:The fact that T3's are no longer allowed by CCP actually validates my original statement. Not really, no, since such limitations have always been there and since your original statement made it sound like this represented some kind of design change.
The design is the same as ever; it's just a balancing adjustment to provide better gameplay. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Copper Rei
Copper Corp
39
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:14:00 -
[89] - Quote
There really are two types of game play....PVE is real. I know most people seem to totally disregard it since it does not appeal to them. As a PVE player it took lots of time, money , and practice to aquire the skills to do exploration well. I learned through many efforts how to do that job without loss of isk due to not recalling my probes or landing on a gatecamp. I have learned the mechanics of the probes themselves so I didn't need to run optimal 7 probes to find a target in under 35 sec. It took skill to be able to go into a hostile l-sec/null sec system and come out alive with my loots.
Now with probes that autorecall and autoscanning so nothing is missed, and cargo scanning cans before you even try to open them. (I spent many hours scanning down sites and hacking and analyzing to find that 4 of 5 cans were empty).
They have given all the talents to everyone without anyone having to earn any of it.
If it were the other way you can bet that all hell would be breaking out since 90% of the players would insta quit.
If they decided that pods would auto fly to a safe place and if a gate were camped you could not warp directly to it.
What if they decided that everyone was able to go directly to Marauder and latrge T2 weapons.
That is basically what they did to exploration.
Too many people found it hard to do exploration because they wanted to kill ships instead.
They want to PVP and use PVE to pay for it since there was no money to be made in PVP for the most part.
Well, CCP, I find that skilling up to maurauders and T2 weapons is just too difficult and it takes too long...so give me all those skills and give me a free ship that has enough bonuses to make me even with all the older players.
Even the field a bit. Balance the playing field.
|

Copper Rei
Copper Corp
39
|
Posted - 2013.06.08 15:17:00 -
[90] - Quote
I need sleep. |

Liltha
Lost My Way Enterprises
13
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 05:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
I took a newish character I had and set it up to train for Tengu and Cerberus, the time to train was 50 and 55 days respectively, so for new players the extra time to train into a hac is not that onerous.
I believe training for the cerberus after training for the tengu involved about 24 days so you might have to wait a bit if you trained into the tengu already, luckily many of the other skills will still hold you in good stead in the cerberus and it is perfectly capable of running 3/10 and 4/10 with ease. |

Liltha
Lost My Way Enterprises
13
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 05:44:00 -
[92] - Quote
Copper Rei wrote: That's only because the reward is insane.
The best item you could get from a 4/10 in blood space was a c-type med armor repper that sold for 160 mil.
Maybe a energized c-type adaptive but that depended on the markets for which was worth more at the time.
Hardly insane.
Step into l-sec and run a 7/10 and you can get a nice 1 bil drop.
The rewards from escelations can easily be far greater than any 4/10 DED.
Incursions pay better. Militia pays better.
[/quote]
So you chose one of the lowest paying 4/10s to make your point? How about we look at the other end of the spectrum, in Gurista 4/10 you can get a Pithum C-type Invuln Field, worth around 500mil at the moment which is quite a bit to make from a single high sec site. On the far other end you can get nothing from these sites, or a module worth a couple mil at best.
Now I'm not going to try and say it's unbalanced, yes maybe CCP shouldn't have put the best invulns as cruiser modules instead of battleship ones, but ultimately it's the players and the market that made those modules worth so much. I just wanted to point out that there is quite a range of value to high sec ded sites. |

Julius Priscus
114
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 05:58:00 -
[93] - Quote
Quote:The best item you could get from a 4/10 in blood space was a c-type med armor repper that sold for 160 mil.
Maybe a energized c-type adaptive but that depended on the markets for which was worth more at the time.
Hardly insane.
Step into l-sec and run a 7/10 and you can get a nice 1 bil drop.
The rewards from escelations can easily be far greater than any 4/10 DED.
Incursions pay better. Militia pays better.
So you chose one of the lowest paying 4/10s to make your point? How about we look at the other end of the spectrum, in Gurista 4/10 you can get a Pithum C-type Invuln Field, worth around 500mil at the moment which is quite a bit to make from a single high sec site. On the far other end you can get nothing from these sites, or a module worth a couple mil at best.
Now I'm not going to try and say it's unbalanced, yes maybe CCP shouldn't have put the best invulns as cruiser modules instead of battleship ones, but ultimately it's the players and the market that made those modules worth so much. I just wanted to point out that there is quite a range of value to high sec ded sites.[/quote] if ccp did make the invulns in 8-10/10's I woulda gotten filthy ******* rich . -»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |

Remiel Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
1511
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 06:16:00 -
[94] - Quote
Complaining about not being able to run 3-4/10s with T3s is like complaining about not being allowed to rat in 0.5 in a battleship. It's overkill. I've run 4/10s in an Atron ffs. If you need a T3 for it, then you're doing something wrong. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Haulie Berry
995
|
Posted - 2013.06.09 07:49:00 -
[95] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote: Wrong, doesn't matter if it's PvP or PvE. The whole point is that CCP creates the content and supplies the tools which we (the playerbase) decide how we're going to use it.
The fact that T3's are no longer allowed by CCP actually validates my original statement.
DMC
This is particularly idiotic.
You've never been able to bring a T3 into a 1/10 or 2/10 and nobody said a thing about it.
You couldn't bring a battlecruiser in a 3/10 or a battleship in a 4/10.
One small adjustment to those limitations and suddenly it's a bunch of melodramatic bull **** about it not being a player driven universe anymore? That may actually be the single flimsiest argument anyone has put forth here, DMC. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |