Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
33467
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:14:00 -
[91] - Quote
I would disagree that Syria has nothing to do with fossil fuels, given that it ispart of a proposed route for natural gas from Qatar/SA to Europe. Given that this would lower prices and increase volume in line with the EU intent to diversify awayy from Russian gas I would think this plays a part in Russias position.
I dont think most people want a war but its obvious we feel we need to do something here, and I'm not sure that the WMDs weren't fired for the purpose of dragging outside part ies into the war. Given how Obama said it was the red line, he has to do something or the US is shown as a paper tiger, much how Russia is generally seen but on a larger scale, strongest of the Great Powers as opposed to the Lone Superpower.
If we genuinely want to solve this and start this week, it nessesitates a ground campaign and occupation. Standoff bombardment like in Libya would crush Assasd and strengthen the rebels relatively and I would be disgusted by NATO if thats the plan. Take out the anti air and the known WMD depots, though a smart move would be to keep them kobile at this point. If SA wants Syria fixed beyond that then it would need to commit its own forces. We already know throuh the cable leaks that they lean heavily on the US to strike at Iran, so they are not some innocents pulled into this.
This could in a worst case be the big one that kicks off the Arab/Persian war again like the Iran/Iraq war if this is mismanaged, and something is going on in the background to distort logic to the current conclusions.
Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /S¦¦GùòGÇ+GÇ+GùòS¦¦\ Unban Saede! |
baltec1
Bat Country
7705
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:15:00 -
[92] - Quote
Graygor wrote:baltec1 wrote:Right now our armed forces are telling our PM that we do not have the ability to take on assad because his cuts mean we have no carriers, few fighterbombers and the army is critcally undermanned.
Best we can do is to use a trafalga class sub to obliterate a few targets but cause no real damage. Maybe they'll realise that gutting the armed forces wasnt the brightest of ideas afterall. Im hoping parliament votes it down. I remember the no to war in 2003 before Iraq, surprised it isnt the same with Syria. I saw on the BBC that the mood is crap in the UK.
The UK military is at rock bottom. Most of the highly experienced squaddies have either left or been sacked. The only airpower our fleet has are sea Lynx, merlins and seakings. We do have the best air defence ships in the world but they cant defend an entire fleet alone. Some of our armoured regiments dont even have any tanks.
We have not been this vulnerable for the last 500 years. |
Graygor
1kB Realty 1kB Galactic
54783
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:19:00 -
[93] - Quote
Kirjava wrote:I would disagree that Syria has nothing to do with fossil fuels, given that it ispart of a proposed route for natural gas from Qatar/SA to Europe. Given that this would lower prices and increase volume in line with the EU intent to diversify awayy from Russian gas I would think this plays a part in Russias position.
I dont think most people want a war but its obvious we feel we need to do something here, and I'm not sure that the WMDs weren't fired for the purpose of dragging outside part ies into the war. Given how Obama said it was the red line, he has to do something or the US is shown as a paper tiger, much how Russia is generally seen but on a larger scale, strongest of the Great Powers as opposed to the Lone Superpower.
If we genuinely want to solve this and start this week, it nessesitates a ground campaign and occupation. Standoff bombardment like in Libya would crush Assasd and strengthen the rebels relatively and I would be disgusted by NATO if thats the plan. Take out the anti air and the known WMD depots, though a smart move would be to keep them kobile at this point. If SA wants Syria fixed beyond that then it would need to commit its own forces. We already know throuh the cable leaks that they lean heavily on the US to strike at Iran, so they are not some innocents pulled into this.
This could in a worst case be the big one that kicks off the Arab/Persian war again like the Iran/Iraq war if this is mismanaged, and something is going on in the background to distort logic to the current conclusions.
Boots on the ground would result in a 3 way clustershag between NATO forces, Assads armies and those moderate freedom loving rebels who are in no way linked to any terrorist groups, no sir.
Last time something like that happened that i can think of is maybe WW1 with Lawrence stirring up the arab tribes that started this whole bloody mess to begin with. "I think you should buy a new Mayan calendar. Mine has muscle cars on it." --áKenneth O'Hara
"I dont think that can happen, you can see Gray has his invuln field on in his portrait." - Commisar Kate |
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
40808
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:20:00 -
[94] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:
I'm sadly resigned to a lot (more) needlessly lost lives whilst various people make hay by wrecking the world.
Welp, that's again been the story of the world most of the time.
This is actually the most peaceful time in humanity's history, weirdly. |
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
33467
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:22:00 -
[95] - Quote
Aye but we have the bases on Cyprus, well within strike range of the RAF. Hopefully reactivating units wont be so tricky as much of the cuts havent bitten yet and need only scrap them, offer reinstatement and bring assets out of mothballs.
Worst thing is the lack of Harriers, we've been caught with our trousers down, now we pay the price and hopefully rearm, ditching the JSF in favour of Navalised Typhoons or whatever we can operate as a stopgap. We cant rely on Trident as our insurance policy all the time.
Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /S¦¦GùòGÇ+GÇ+GùòS¦¦\ Unban Saede! |
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2010
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:24:00 -
[96] - Quote
Graygor wrote:Unrelated but good to know you're still around Silens, havent seen you on the boards for quite a while. Thank you. Been rather busy, and frankly in a pretty cranky mood. I tend to step back from social media when I feel my inner jackass coming to the fore.
No.... Asked by the grandstanding pols who've painted themselves into a corner with their thoughtless jingoism and rhetoric.
American diplomacy in the ME still thinks Jefferson is in the Whitehouse, and 'sending in the Marines' is still the answer to everything. Until they actually get a few policy experts who know the region and the peoples - AND LISTEN TO THEM - we're going to be doing this same old dance forever, stumbling ever more badly as we go.
Quote: Captain Lawrence Oates may have had it right when he gave up his life for Scott and the others.
To say "im just going outside, i maybe gone sometime" sounds mighty appealing in all this madness.
Yeah. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |
baltec1
Bat Country
7705
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:26:00 -
[97] - Quote
Kirjava wrote:Aye but we have the bases on Cyprus, well within strike range of the RAF. Hopefully reactivating units wont be so tricky as much of the cuts havent bitten yet and need only scrap them, offer reinstatement and bring assets out of mothballs.
Worst thing is the lack of Harriers, we've been caught with our trousers down, now we pay the price and hopefully rearm, ditching the JSF in favour of Navalised Typhoons or whatever we can operate as a stopgap. We cant rely on Trident as our insurance policy all the time.
The harriers are still in boxes in ghe UK. One of our carriers can still launch them dispite being converted to a helicopter carrier. We would however need to as the US marines for our planes back. |
Graygor
1kB Realty 1kB Galactic
54790
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:26:00 -
[98] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:The UK military is at rock bottom. Most of the highly experienced squaddies have either left or been sacked. The only airpower our fleet has are sea Lynx, merlins and seakings. We do have the best air defence ships in the world but they cant defend an entire fleet alone. Some of our armoured regiments dont even have any tanks.
We have not been this vulnerable for the last 500 years.
12 years of war will do that to an Army.
Its disgusting that they bailed out the bankers and didnt do f all for the army than a paltry pay raise.
Too much is wasted on "procurement tours" (read massive overfunded bloated defence contracts) by whitehall civvies who are basically on a massive bender.
Absolutely sickening. "I think you should buy a new Mayan calendar. Mine has muscle cars on it." --áKenneth O'Hara
"I dont think that can happen, you can see Gray has his invuln field on in his portrait." - Commisar Kate |
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2010
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:32:00 -
[99] - Quote
Graygor wrote:
Boots on the ground would result in a 3 way clustershag between NATO forces, Assads armies and those moderate freedom loving rebels who are in no way linked to any terrorist groups, no sir.
Along with some vigorous pot-stirring and intervention by outside interested parties, including most especially Russia, but not discounting various experienced jihadis who are currently without a cause, and anyone who would love to see the major powers tied up in knots.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
33469
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:32:00 -
[100] - Quote
Graygor wrote:
Boots on the ground would result in a 3 way clustershag between NATO forces, Assads armies and those moderate freedom loving rebels who are in no way linked to any terrorist groups, no sir.
Last time something like that happened that i can think of is maybe WW1 with Lawrence stirring up the arab tribes that started this whole bloody mess to begin with.
Which is a terrifying proposition that I hope we do not do, but the rhetoric about ending Assads regime leads to a 3 way ground campaign or societal collapse with warlords vieing for the spoils over the ruins. Given time Assad would win, which is why then Chemical weapons usage, especially after Israel has selectively bombed suspected ammo dumpz en route to Hezbollah shows they are watching and prepared to sortie.
Im sitting in the "they can't seriously mean they wa t to do this" camp but have a sense of dread that they might actually do it. And it would have been unessacary to even come this far if someone e hadn't called it a red line that would inevitability be crossed. It is madness.
Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /S¦¦GùòGÇ+GÇ+GùòS¦¦\ Unban Saede! |
|
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2010
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:34:00 -
[101] - Quote
Graygor wrote:baltec1 wrote:The UK military is at rock bottom. Most of the highly experienced squaddies have either left or been sacked. The only airpower our fleet has are sea Lynx, merlins and seakings. We do have the best air defence ships in the world but they cant defend an entire fleet alone. Some of our armoured regiments dont even have any tanks.
We have not been this vulnerable for the last 500 years. 12 years of war will do that to an Army. Its disgusting that they bailed out the bankers and didnt do f all for the army than a paltry pay raise. Too much is wasted on "procurement tours" (read massive overfunded bloated defence contracts) by whitehall civvies who are basically on a massive bender. Absolutely sickening. 12 years of war, run by people who can follow 'cause and effect' ought leave you with a pretty well-prepared and refined army.
Sadly, that's not been so. Instead, it's been treated as political football, with some fair amount of graft on the side. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |
Adunh Slavy
1225
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:36:00 -
[102] - Quote
Jayem See wrote: I thought governments were meant to represent the people? Not force them down a route of death and retaliation.
Where did you get the notion that government represents you? Let me guess, a government run education program. Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.-á-á- William Pitt |
|
CCP Falcon
3875
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:38:00 -
[103] - Quote
Discussion of real life politics is not permitted on the EVE Online forums.
Locked.
CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
33483
|
Posted - 2013.08.27 14:39:00 -
[104] - Quote
Falklands war did wonders for the Navy, demanding upgrades, new battleplans and strategic assets. I suppose even if we dont see action in this war it will be readily apparent we are not ready.
Who am I kidding, peoples lesson learned will be that we should disarm further as we "don't have an Empire anymore" instead of investment, excercises because as we all know, noone wants to attack us and the Cold War which the west started is over so no consequences because we said so.
/ Guardian and talking with my hippy mother fueled rant
Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /S¦¦GùòGÇ+GÇ+GùòS¦¦\ Unban Saede! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |