| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4771
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 21:10:00 -
[271] - Quote
20,000 ishkone watch ibis
nope There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

None ofthe Above
841
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 21:44:00 -
[272] - Quote
I do see a few places where this all could have been handled better, so understand why players can rightly be upset.
I didn't like the idea of reviving ships that were promised to be never be produced again, but that was fixed. (Lore wise, I have no problem with the NPCs changing their mind and making ships that were formerly unavailable or limited runs. But I feel CCP should keep it's promises.)
Key thing that is getting lost in the scuffle:
To my mind I think it's a good thing that CCP has realized that one of it's greatest assets in EVE is it's playerbase. I like that they are doing things to support that. The community focuses, the supported fansites. Sponsored and attended RL events.
SOMER has a track record of sponsoring EVE related events. CCP has worked with them before. It's only natural that they continued to grow that relationship. Perhaps they went a little too far this last time, and I appreciate their corrections of pulling back a bit with prizes.
The community is letting CCP know that a line has been crossed, in their view. That's all fine, but let us not cripple their ability to sponsor future events and enter into co-marketing arrangements with player groups. I see this as critical to the ongoing success of EVE.
So let us give some thought to how this could be handled in a more reasonable fashion. And how we can help make EVE last into the THIRD decade, shall we? The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit. |

Maximilian Akora
It's just business.
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 23:41:00 -
[273] - Quote
As long as there's people in CCP who make decisions like these we'll (have to) continue to rage, rally and threadnaught. |

Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
1103
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 11:41:00 -
[274] - Quote
None ofthe Above wrote:So let us give some thought to how this could be handled in a more reasonable fashion. And how we can help make EVE last into the THIRD decade, shall we?
Some idea's both of mine and others:
- Instead of handing out ingame items that can (for a while) have an extraordinary in game value, give out tickets or points for free fanfest tickets. With enough points you have a free ticket to fanfest.
Good side is that you don't give out in game items that are worth tons of isk for collectors at the start of the hand out, and worth considerable less when the last ones receive the thank you (for the fish in this case). Bad side: costs CCP real money and needs to be tightly organized.
- Instead of giving (temporarily) valuable items, raise a big ingame statue for those with remarkable deeds done to the EVE community and print their names on it accompanied with wiki related stuff.
Good side, I doubt that anybody (cough, I forget where I am ) can get upset about someone's name being put on an in game statue that lasts as long as EVE lasts. Unless the character makes a 'mittani' of course. Bad side again it needs to be tightly organized by CCP and we all know it can take month's for CCP to act upon promises that where made in the past like a recently promised(cough) 10 year(cough) vets station (cough cough).
- Or devalue the 'gift' before release by stating how many excactly you're going to hand out, still risks favoritism and all the other stuff that got people up in flames now, at least it contains it somewhat
And yes of course, never, ever, ever hand out gifts like a thief in the night again. Transparency you know? Being open about what you, when you do and why (by what criteria) you do hand out gifts.
And I'm sure others can come up with plenty more suggestions.
Now I'm off taking care of that terrible cough. |

Jamison
Southern Gothic
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 14:51:00 -
[275] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:The following is a summary of CSM activity over the last few days regarding the SOMER Blink promotion. The CSM was not consulted in advance about this promotion, so it was just as much a surprise to us as it was to the community. Our reaction was broadly similar to that expressed in the forums. On Thursday the 26th, we received an update on the situation from CCP Dolan after our regular Stakeholder meeting with Team Five-0. Later in the day, we got a second update from CCP Dolan and CCP Manifest. During those meetings, we outlined five areas of concern that we felt CCP's response should address. These were: 1. Reintroduction of historically important or unique ships. 2. Favoring one community fan site over others. 3. Trusting a community fan site, and more particularly, a player, with the task of selecting the winners. 4. Forcing players to use SOMER Blink in order to enter -- which may have legal consequences in some jurisdictions. 5. Providing direct benefit to a for-profit gambling fansite. CCP Navigator's announcement on Thursday of changes to the prize structure has addressed (1), and details of the method of selecting winners (which we urge CCP to make public) leaves the CSM reasonably confident that the actual drawing will be fair, addressing issue (3). Issues (2) and (5) are business decisions that CCP has the right to make. We think they are a mistake, and hope that the uproar over this issue will cause CCP to re-evaluate these policies for future promotions. Supporting groups that have a clear educational/public service focus in-game is one thing; supporting a group that is distinctly for-profit -- and one that can use the ISK it generates to secretly support in-game groups -- breeds distrust for CCP in the community. However, the requirement that one must be a member of SOMER Blink in order to participate remains, and for a lottery with such significant prizes, is very troubling to us. Furthermore, the structure of the lottery, which encourages and rewards extensive use of SOMER Blink, may raise legal concerns in some jurisdictions. For example, in the United States, commercial lotteries cannot require the purchase of a product or service in order to receive an entry. For this reason, we strongly suggest that the entry mechanic be adjusted as follows: 1) Members of SOMER Blink are automatically entered into the lottery and receive one ticket, regardless of how much they use the site. 2) An alternate method (such as posting in a particular thread) be used to allow people to enter who do not wish to become a member of SOMER Blink. We further recommend that procedures be put in place to sanity-check future promotions to ensure that they are acceptable to the community. On Friday morning we sent this statement to CCP for their comments, and on Friday evening David Reid (CCP Pokethulu, CCP's CMO) replied to us as follows (reproduced with permission): Quote:Thank you for your thoughtful feedback, and for the opportunity to review your statement in advance of publishing it to the community.
We acknowledge that we rushed this event, and we are certainly learning from it now.
Your statement strikes us as factually correct and appropriate to publish, and there are a few further details we want to share with you also.
First, we are developing a program to allow all 3rd parties the opportunity to apply to participate in these kinds of events and promotions with CCP support, and we will have news on that shortly. In general, we believe CCP should foster the activities our players enjoy, and it is clear these kinds of activities have a lot of support in the EVE community, much like we see in other games.
That said, we recognize it is imperative for CCP to remain impartial with respect to which 3rd parties receive CCP support for these kinds of activities. To that end, we will develop a clear policy on how we plan to conduct future events, including how we will determine which 3rd parties and which events will receive CCP support, and we will develop that policy in consultation with the CSM.
We also want to assure you that we are working closely with CCP's legal team to ensure all legal concerns resulting from this event, and future events like it, are addressed.
If you wish, it's fine to let the community know in your statement that CCP has informed you we are working on a clear 3rd party program for future events and that we will consult with you on this program as we develop it, but there's certainly no requirement for you to include this in your statement.
Thank you again for your feedback here and we welcome your further thoughts.
Thanks, David The CSM will endeavor to keep the community informed as there are further developments in this issue, and as always, your input is most appreciated. Sincerely, The Members of the 8th Council of Stellar Management Stickied on request of CSM. ISD Ezwal.
Thank you Trebor for the update. Also I want to thank the CSM for their work on this issue, hopefully we will see more transparency in the future. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2387
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 15:24:00 -
[276] - Quote
LOL at Eterne closing a thread about a CCP dev giving direct, secret gifts to individual players and referring us to this thread, which was a separate issue (granted both involved somer blink) entirely
good job, mate. Real smooth cover up |

Kate stark
487
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 15:27:00 -
[277] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:LOL at Eterne closing a thread about a CCP dev giving direct, secret gifts to individual players and referring us to this thread, which was a separate issue (granted both involved somer blink) entirely
good job, mate. Real smooth cover up
funnily enough, i just posted pretty much the same thing in the other thread. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
71
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 15:28:00 -
[278] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:LOL at Eterne closing a thread about a CCP dev giving direct, secret gifts to individual players and referring us to this thread, which was a separate issue (granted both involved somer blink) entirely
good job, mate. Real smooth cover up it's almost like they keep doing the wrong thing... |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3775
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 15:58:00 -
[279] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:LOL at Eterne closing a thread about a CCP dev giving direct, secret gifts to individual players and referring us to this thread, which was a separate issue (granted both involved somer blink) entirely
good job, mate. Real smooth cover up
Just typical CCP "anti-threadnaught" damage control. Let a thread get to a certain size, and then lock it, directing players to one or more threads that will also be locked for :reasons:.
It's pretty obvious they really don't intend to discuss this matter, and they won't be reversing or changing direction, because screw you, that's why.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Prince Kobol
1014
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 16:48:00 -
[280] - Quote
I actually agree with the thread being closed as the subject had long been abandon and the thread had become nothing more then a few people sniping, flaming and trolling each other which is unfortunate.
If you do not want to get threads locked then simply do not respond to people who are clearly trolling / flaming as if they get no response they will quickly get bored and move on elsewhere. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
972
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 17:42:00 -
[281] - Quote
Shame on you CCP. The Tears Must Flow |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 17:52:00 -
[282] - Quote
CCP, please fix things and please give a response to our concerns about SomerGate, soon, please. |

Milly Merner
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 19:03:00 -
[283] - Quote
Yes, I will keep subbing my 5 accounts.
But, I was going to buy the Collector's Edition.
Now I'm not. |

Tao Dolcino
Radio Silence Inc.
216
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 20:48:00 -
[284] - Quote
Subscription cancelled. Favoritism is good - CCP 2013 |

Memnon Shepard
Crimson Reavers
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 21:24:00 -
[285] - Quote
Posting here if only to say I'm still paying attention to this issue. I laughed when the only thing CCP could be bothered to do on the previous thread, after over 74 pages of customers expressing disapproval of their actions and requesting an official comment, was to shut the thread down and refer everyone to pages started as a result of completely separate topics. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
580
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 21:26:00 -
[286] - Quote
Rome's burning and CaesarCP fiddles. |

Prince Kobol
1015
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 21:49:00 -
[287] - Quote
Memnon Shepard wrote:Posting here if only to say I'm still paying attention to this issue. I laughed when the only thing CCP could be bothered to do on the previous thread, after over 74 pages of customers expressing disapproval of their actions and requesting an official comment, was to shut the thread down and refer everyone to pages started as a result of completely separate topics.
Read my last post |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
343
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 22:06:00 -
[288] - Quote
It's cool how the only response from CCP is to lock all related threads threads on the front page of GD.
That totally worked at the start of the Incarna debacle. 
Edit: And another one bites the dust. (That one was wholly constructive.) At this point they're just trying to reduce visibility, CCP clearly doesn't want to address the underlying issue. |

Oxylan
QRDELESH - Mutual Admiration Society
58
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 22:11:00 -
[289] - Quote
Hi CCP Im Oxylan person who love your game since 2006 who spent online 514d 18h 00m, can i have cookie? I dont talk about my self i talk about thousands other people wo love your game..
And now serious what the hell to giving xx faction battleship to random corporarion as gift to evey member because they do some things to EvE community? this things i caled lotto - and dirty real life greed to be rich in Virtual reality ! like in every countrys lotto mechanic who reward one and robe milion others.
Ps. I dont want any reward for being your customer and Big fan and hardcore EvE player, all what you can offer me you give to me to me long time ago, by indroducing EvE online.
If it bleed we can kill it. |

Memnon Shepard
Crimson Reavers
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 01:02:00 -
[290] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:I actually agree with the thread being closed as the subject had long been abandon and the thread had become nothing more then a few people sniping, flaming and trolling each other which is unfortunate.
If you do not want to get threads locked then simply do not respond to people who are clearly trolling / flaming as if they get no response they will quickly get bored and move on elsewhere.
Even if you think closing the thread was correct, why would CCP have not made a comment of their own before locking? I think that's all many of the posters with complaints were requesting for most of the weekend.
|

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
440
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 03:21:00 -
[291] - Quote
CCP Response WiP: Soon CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

Prince Kobol
1016
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 12:18:00 -
[292] - Quote
Memnon Shepard wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:I actually agree with the thread being closed as the subject had long been abandon and the thread had become nothing more then a few people sniping, flaming and trolling each other which is unfortunate.
If you do not want to get threads locked then simply do not respond to people who are clearly trolling / flaming as if they get no response they will quickly get bored and move on elsewhere. Even if you think closing the thread was correct, why would CCP have not made a comment of their own before locking? I think that's all many of the posters with complaints were requesting for most of the weekend.
Erm, maybe because it was the weekend and also many staff were on holiday?
Also in response to a few others, its better having 1 thread opposed to many threads.
Just because people seem to have this feeling of some kind of self importance that makes them open a new entirely about the same subject over and over again is beyond me. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2414
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 13:06:00 -
[293] - Quote
I'm still looking forward to how they respond to the fact that somer is known to ban people at their discretion (such as same IP address), and you are required to pay somer in order to partake.
There are plenty of people who pay their subscriptions and have accounts in good standing who were literally incapable of partaking in this give away, as the third party CCP gave control decided to exclude them.
That above all else is disgusting.
|

Prince Kobol
1023
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 13:45:00 -
[294] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I'm still looking forward to how they respond to the fact that somer is known to ban people at their discretion (such as same IP address), and you are required to pay somer in order to partake.
There are plenty of people who pay their subscriptions and have accounts in good standing who were literally incapable of partaking in this give away, as the third party CCP gave control decided to exclude them.
That above all else is disgusting.
I posted why in the other thread. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
552
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 16:04:00 -
[295] - Quote
Carka Gerschen wrote:Murk Paradox wrote:Carka Gerschen wrote:I am just wondering about a few things though, since when is making ISK in an online videogame a commercial lottery. I might not understand the US legal system, but that might even be too farfetched for the US legal system.
And the second thing is, wasn't the reintroduction of unique ships the main issue here and the biggest problem, considering this wasn't something worthy for the CSM to look at when CCP gave Somer Blink some prizes at their last celebration.
And going for hypothetical legal systems, wouldn't changing the way the drawing is done be a breach of contract with the people who entered ISK into the Somer Blink site, with the promise of gaining a bigger chance of winning those items?
Regards,
Carka You know how you go to a casino, and purchase chips with cash, those chips do not have any value outside of the casino? Yeah. Isk can be bought with real cash. When you have a business (And somer blink is a business) that has business practices dealing with ingame and out of game money (GTC cards for instance)... it becomes a commercial lottery. When your boss draws names from his employee pool to see who gets to stay late, that is not a commercial lottery. That would be true if you would buy tokens for Somer blink with real life money, which you don't. You use ISK to buy ticket in the lottery. While it is true, that there is a way to get ISK for real life money by means of buying a PLEX, there is still the issue, that there is no way to exchange the ISK back to real life money. Eventhough it is true, Somer blink makes real life money, by a comission they get from linking people to the MarkeeDragon site, that is not directly related to the ISK people put into the site. So your analogy is not entirely correct and I still would say it is not a commercial lottery. But to each their own opinion.
Well, for 1 the tokens are not free.
Second, if I were to have a referral site in my bio, or in my signature, would you choose my link over Somer Blink? (I would not be offering anything to you except the ease of clicking the link you might have happened across).
I'd guess no, since I would not be offering any incentives to buy GTC from me, and wouldn't be supplying you a chance to get any ingame items/isk.
The analogy can also be used that even if you lose in a casino, the fact you spent money there could get you free drinks and even a free room for the night. ("Comps").
Lottery may be the incorrect term, but it's used loosely since when you gamble, you bet against the dealer/house (blackjack/roulette/slot machines) whereas lotteries are more like hold 'em, keno, and those nifty wheels that have dollar bills your pointer can land on.
Loosely, again, those can be compared to bonks, minibonkis, promo blinks, and paid blinks. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Nolak Ataru
Incursion Osprey Replacement Fund LLC
16
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 17:37:00 -
[296] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Mr Reid said Quote:To that end, we will develop a clear policy on how we plan to conduct future events, including how we will determine which 3rd parties and which events will receive CCP support, and we will develop that policy in consultation with the CSM. So no, it isn't just ask and get. As to it being a new thing look back through the larger player meets and events. Swag has been happening for more than the past month. It is just this made the news because of the scale of the swag. We (CSM) are working on it as the above letter shows. They (CCP) is working on it as well. m
Well hell, if that's the case, I'd like to enter my corp as a 3rd party ready to recieve T2 BPOs and GVexors.... |

Ciaphas Cyne
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 11:39:00 -
[297] - Quote
ive always seen any sort of organized gambling institution as a tax on the stupid. ive also always seen CCP as the kind of company that would actively try to mess with its player base for the lulz. "buff only the stuff I fly and nerf everything else"
- you |

Keeper of TheLost
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 15:56:00 -
[298] - Quote
OK CCP has in a way said they made a mistake and in the future it will not happen like this again. Now to the ? everyone wants to know is how are they going to fix the current mistake. I think they will try to let this blow over thinking that the players will forget about it quickly with the new expansion coming out. I wouldn't have been bothered if it was GTC's that were given out but in game items so rare and that expensive kinda give an unfair advantage in game to the ones that received the free ships. Just goes to show us that what we thought was a player run universe is actually not. |

Skywalker
MAFIA Pirate Coalition
55
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:33:00 -
[299] - Quote
Unfortunately this whole things smells WRONG in the first place, what about common sense, things like this shouldn't even need a corporate policy. I have been playing for 10+y and this one of few times CCP actually upset me.
|

FlinchingNinja Kishunuba
Crunchy Crunchy Zero Hour Alliance
164
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:07:00 -
[300] - Quote
My theory is that 9 out of 10 conspiracies are actually down to incompetence. But I have a feeling there is something else here that is being hidden. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |