Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1887
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:20:00 -
[121] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:All I would expect you to do even if you don't yourself feel irrelevant is to convey to CCP it is being perceived that way.
You'd have saved us a lot of time and effort if you'd said this up front.  Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:25:00 -
[122] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:During those meetings, we outlined five areas of concern that we felt CCP's response should address. These were:
1. Reintroduction of historically important or unique ships.
2. Favoring one community fan site over others.
3. Trusting a community fan site, and more particularly, a player, with the task of selecting the winners.
4. Forcing players to use SOMER Blink in order to enter -- which may have legal consequences in some jurisdictions.
5. Providing direct benefit to a for-profit gambling fansite.
CCP Navigator's announcement on Thursday of changes to the prize structure has addressed (1), and details of the method of selecting winners (which we urge CCP to make public) leaves the CSM reasonably confident that the actual drawing will be fair, addressing issue (3).
Issues (2) and (5) are business decisions that CCP has the right to make. We think they are a mistake, and hope that the uproar over this issue will cause CCP to re-evaluate these policies for future promotions. Supporting groups that have a clear educational/public service focus in-game is one thing; supporting a group that is distinctly for-profit -- and one that can use the ISK it generates to secretly support in-game groups -- breeds distrust for CCP in the community.
Dear CSM / CCP,
Points 2 and 5 might be business decisions, but they are not simply "mistakes", they are absolutely unfair, biased and wrong.
It seems that this favouritism towards SB isn't the first time it has occured. ( If I had known about that, I would have voiced my concern back then ). It is this favouritism which is the major concern of this whole issue.
Isn't there some conflict of intereast with CCP dealing with SB, considering there are some/one people who were associated with SB who are now CCP employees.
And how does it work that, SB is sponsering the 2013 LV meeting ? Where is that financial support coming from ?
This whole favouritism issue stinks of corruption, and it should/must stop.
CCP please fix things. |

Baron vonDoom
Scorn.
70
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:25:00 -
[123] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:
In re: perceptions. All I would expect you to do even if you don't yourself feel irrelevant is to convey to CCP it is being perceived that way. Like I said earlier, I don't blame the CSM for this. It's CCP that seems to be returning to their old ways. Claiming Ignorance on CCPs part is hardly passable any longer given they have 10 years of experience in dealing with what will and won't cause a riot, and a group of players dedicated (and elected) to help them NOT do stupid things like this.
I also agree in re: accomplishments can be overshadowed by a few bad events like these. The biggest problem I have with it is this seems to be an increasing problem, and not one that is diminishing.
The CSM is not to blame - as you noted, they were introduced to prevent decisions like these.
Obviosuly, CCP realized the CSM would dissuade CCP from doing what they did, so they decided not to ask in the first place.
A fine opprtunity for the current SCM to show they enforce players interest instead of just acting as chearleaders and kapos. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9161
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:31:00 -
[124] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:So where the complaints or forums post from the CSM for the previous prizes given away, unless you are saying that none of the CSM were aware of the prizes for the Q1 Celebrations?
so this clearly anything but a "developing program" considering that CCP has previously given things to somer blink with no strings attached under the assumption that they'd give them away to people on their site
i'm not sure what you're getting at, other than telling everybody that CCP are lying to the playerbase through their teeth, again, and presenting more evidence of CCP's favoritism towards one particular player Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1235
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:35:00 -
[125] - Quote
After this issue and ToSgate have been resolved/swept under the rug, I think there should be a discussion about what these two issues signify for the current state of CCP, the CSM, and the community. I am not happy that this stuff keeps happening, I am not happy that the CSM keeps getting ignored, I am not happy that we have to go through the tired process of forum rabble-rousing before the productive discourse begins, and I'm tired that these issues will likely not be resolved to the communities' satisfaction when they're over.
That said, shitting on the CSM every step of the way does nothing but frustrate them and alienate them from the community that they are trying to represent, aside from the one(s) that are just angling for later jobs at CCP (no name(s)). I think we, as the community, should work with the CSM and support them in an effort to argue for more use of the CSM and a direct use of them when issues arise instead of waiting for a shitstorm to brew first. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1887
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:38:00 -
[126] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote: aside from the one(s) that are just angling for later jobs at CCP (no name(s)).

I dunno, I'm actually kinda curious who you seem to think is angling for later jobs at CCP. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1235
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:41:00 -
[127] - Quote
No name(s). Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1887
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:41:00 -
[128] - Quote
No fun. 
e: Odds are you're wrong. Especially if I'm one of your candidates. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1235
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:47:00 -
[129] - Quote
It was actually just a sop to broaden the general appeal of my argument, but now you've ruined it.
Thanks. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9161
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:48:00 -
[130] - Quote
mynnna wrote:e: Odds are you're wrong. Especially if I'm one of your candidates.
why wouldn't you want rotten shark, cured head cheese and Brennivin every year Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3691
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:52:00 -
[131] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Doc Fury wrote:All I would expect you to do even if you don't yourself feel irrelevant is to convey to CCP it is being perceived that way.
You'd have saved us both a lot of time and effort if you'd said this up front. 
Sokath, his eyes uncovered!
My previous posts probably make more sense in that light, no? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

ShipsOfEve
www.shipsofeve.com
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 00:32:00 -
[132] - Quote
Reyna Snoo wrote:I imagine CCP is kinda confused as this isn't the first time they've given prizes to Somer to give away. For Somer's one quadrillion celebration CCP gave them 4 Collectors Editions and some Ishukone Watch Scorpions to give away using this same giveaway mechanic and nobody seemed to care about it then. Is it the large in-game value that makes this different?
There is a precedent that goes even further back than those, and for other 3rd parties. |

Zaxix
Long Jump.
315
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 03:18:00 -
[133] - Quote
I can agree with pretty much anything CCP says or does outside of the game on the general principle that "it's their business" and none of mine. The problem is that the rewards are ingame. They're creating a whole new form of PvP. Third-party websites will be competing for ingame rewards and as soon as it becomes clear what the rules are, the true metagaming will begin. That stage will be immediately followed by the "Rules Lawyer" phase in which every third party website engages in a battle royale of Who's Best and Who Met the Criteria But Got Jacked, Again, Because CCP Is Mean, Hates Me, and Supports My Enemy.
Inevitably, someone will point out that unless the rewards are all given out simultaneously, timing is a factor. Rewards are a benefit NOW, and if you give my enemy a pile of goodies NOW, I might not survive to collect my own pile of isk later. Your place in the line becomes a point of contention.
And then, and then, and then.
If CCP wants to reward third-party sites for helping build CCP's business, they should do it out of game. The concept of providing a free Fanfest trip and that sort of thing is a great idea. If someone feels strongly about ingame incentives, then the rewards should be cosmetic but permanent. Naming systems, planets, or stations, that sort of thing. Perhaps something along the lines of getting a chance to push certain fixes/additions/"resonable things" to the top of CCP's to do list.
It is inevitable that cash and ISK rewards will have bad results. This game is full of really smart people who live to figure out how to game the system. Bokononist
-á |

Dalto Bane
Knights of the Posing Meat The Obsidian Front
6
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 03:30:00 -
[134] - Quote
Thank you CSM! Now all the buttmad can cease for the time being. I, for one am glad CCP are at least trying new things. Where was this uproar when Somber Blink was donating iskies for the New Eden Open? I personally think that everyone that is angry over this to refer to the EULA and policy. "CCP reserves the right...". They should listen to their player base, not cater 100% to their complaints. And no I do not participate, nor care what happens to Somber Blink. It's hard for me to imagine how gambling is not an illegal RMT type action of some kind and they all should be shut down... but I want everyone to have their fun so I don't blap forums with that kind of talk. Let everyone on a little secret, it takes CCP a few clicks to populate an extinct one of a kind ship, a few clicks to drop a few trillion isk in a wallet, and a few to take it all away, and they don't need Somber or anyone else to do it if they wanted to, but I highly doubt there is some super conspiracy out there |

Prince Kobol
949
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 07:20:00 -
[135] - Quote
Andski wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:So where the complaints or forums post from the CSM for the previous prizes given away, unless you are saying that none of the CSM were aware of the prizes for the Q1 Celebrations? so this clearly anything but a "developing program" considering that CCP has previously given things to somer blink with no strings attached under the assumption that they'd give them away to people on their site i'm not sure what you're getting at, other than telling everybody that CCP are lying to the playerbase through their teeth, again, and presenting more evidence of CCP's favoritism towards one particular player
Poorly twisted and avoiding my original question
People can quite clearly see what I am asking and that is why did nobody have any issues before but now they do? |

Abditus Cularius
Clancularius Industries
217
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 07:28:00 -
[136] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote: Poorly twisted and avoiding my original question
People can quite clearly see what I am asking and that is why did nobody have any issues before but now they do?
Ignorance. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9170
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 09:58:00 -
[137] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Poorly twisted and avoiding my original question
People can quite clearly see what I am asking and that is why did nobody have any issues before but now they do?
as it turns out a lot of people are indeed surprised to find out that somer blink was gifted items by CCP not one, but twice
not all of us are gambling addicts who compulsively f5 for promos and celebrations, so forgive us for not being aware of every single thing somer blink has ever given away Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2245
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 10:13:00 -
[138] - Quote
So from what I can see, every response thus far from CCP has indicated they are going to continue with the favouritism, with handing control of special EVE items/events over to a player/group who are known to exclude players at their discretion, which forces players to use their third party site and purchase a GTC (I'm a bit murky on this one actually, but it sounded like thats how you had to initially get credit?), and a group whose systems and services are not public to either CCP or the players (and as such, no guarantees, like the ones Navigator made about the history or trustworthiness of the player group can be made)
well my response to that is thus:
-2 subscriptions. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
194
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 10:13:00 -
[139] - Quote
Thanks CSM, good work so far! And while I am criticizing a lot about this issue I still believe CCP intended well with this whole thing and didn't omit the CSM because they knew the answer would be negative. But of course intending well is not enough.
Sentient Blade wrote:Third party developers and event organizers add additional features and content to the game that CCP does not have the resources or will to develop and maintain themselves. We'd be less well off without them.
Tossing them a few things here and there to help bring more people to their services is a good thing.
I'd like to see the people who make things like EHQ, Eve-Kill, EFT etc thrown a few gifts in the process. Either deliberately or maybe by chance, all those 3rd parties you mention are out-of-game non-profit entities and not in ingame competition with anyone. I would be much less concerned about the whole issue if such an organization had been chosen instead of an ingame for-profit one.
That said, even in the case of an out-of-game non-profit organization I still wouldn't want the CCP support to be massive ingame valuables but rather out-of-game stuff as much as possible. Because even when the organizations themselves are not in competition the players making up the organizations are part of the sandbox and therefore always somehow in competition.
Strictly personally speaking as one of 3 EveHQ devs it would feel wrong to me if we were handed massively valuable ingame stuff from CCP. I won't deny that I would stroke my epeen and be very happy if we were to get a Spotlight dev blog though. 
CCP Pokethulu wrote:We also want to assure you that we are working closely with CCP's legal team to ensure all legal concerns resulting from this event, and future events like it, are addressed. Uh oh, is that the same legal team that is supposedly reworking the 3rd party dev license without any published progress since January? Which is what apparently is a major factor of keeping CREST from being deployed. Which incidentally is something the whole 3rd party dev community could massively profit from without any issues of favouritism.
If the answer is yes, then please don't slow down that precious legal team any more.  |

arabella blood
I Swear She Looked 18
177
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 10:15:00 -
[140] - Quote
Can i have your stuff? Troll for hire. Cheap prices. |

Prince Kobol
952
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 10:58:00 -
[141] - Quote
Andski wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Poorly twisted and avoiding my original question
People can quite clearly see what I am asking and that is why did nobody have any issues before but now they do? as it turns out a lot of people are indeed surprised to find out that somer blink was gifted items by CCP not one, but twice not all of us are gambling addicts who compulsively f5 for promos and celebrations, so forgive us for not being aware of every single thing somer blink has ever given away
Considering the amount of people who play Somerblink I find it very hard to believe that only a handful of players knew about the Q1 Gifts, especially considering a couple of well know Eve Bloggers posted about it and its was on both EN24 and Reddit.
So yeah, trying to come across all high and mighty and classing everybody who play's somer as "gambling addicts" is pretty low, even by your standards. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
194
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 11:16:00 -
[142] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Considering the amount of people who play Somerblink I find it very hard to believe that only a handful of players knew about the Q1 Gifts, especially considering a couple of well know Eve Bloggers posted about it and its was on both EN24 and Reddit. For whatever it might be worth to you, I didn't know about it.
I still don't see the point behind this whole line of argumentation though. Just because something bad happened in the past we can't be arguing about something bad (in fact even worse because of the increased value) happening now? That doesn't make sense to me. The only thing this could IMO explain is why CCP might not have expected backlash, but I'm already assuming good intentions on CCP's side. |

Alt Two
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
29
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 11:54:00 -
[143] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:So from what I can see, every response thus far from CCP has indicated they are going to continue with the favouritism, with handing control of special EVE items/events over to a player/group who are known to exclude players at their discretion, which forces players to use their third party site and purchase a GTC (I'm a bit murky on this one actually, but it sounded like thats how you had to initially get credit?), and a group whose systems and services are not public to either CCP or the players (and as such, no guarantees, like the ones Navigator made about the history or trustworthiness of the player group can be made)
well my response to that is thus:
-2 subscriptions. You don't have to buy a GTC, that's just one of the ways to get blink credit. It's either that or sending them isk in game. |

Prince Kobol
952
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 11:58:00 -
[144] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Considering the amount of people who play Somerblink I find it very hard to believe that only a handful of players knew about the Q1 Gifts, especially considering a couple of well know Eve Bloggers posted about it and its was on both EN24 and Reddit. For whatever it might be worth to you, I didn't know about it. I still don't see the point behind this whole line of argumentation though. Just because something bad happened in the past we can't be arguing about something bad (in fact even worse because of the increased value) happening now? That doesn't make sense to me. The only thing this could IMO explain is why CCP might not have expected backlash, but I'm already assuming good intentions on CCP's side.
It matters because I personally feel there is a witch hunt going here and people are using this as an excuse to rage.
Maybe it is a backlash over the recent change over the TOS and EULA.
Somer Blink gave away 320 bil isk to teams who entered the New Open Tournament, apparently they have also given a large amount of isk to Eve Uni, not sure if this is true but I am sure but it would be nice if could be confirmed.
Will this rage now make Somer think twice about sponsoring any other future events.. if so then we have all lost out.
Yes people will say its just a drop in a ocean yet I do not see anybody else donating isk like this and there are many alliances that can afford it.
My worry is that CCP now back track with working with 3rd Party groups.
I feel that they need to continue with this.
Hell I think CCP should give people who give us Z Killboard, EveMom, EveHQ, Somer Blink and players like Chribba unique new ships as a thank you for all the hard work they have done over the years to promote Eve.
That is my own opinion but chances are it will never happen because people will come on the forum and cry a river of tears and claim favoritism.
My question to those who use the favoritism argument is what have you done for all Eve Players?
If Somerblink is so evil as some people portray them to be why are they so popular?
There are other Eve gambling sites which are nowhere as popular.
|

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
409
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 13:37:00 -
[145] - Quote
All I see are goons metagamining in this thread because they didn't get the shiny and somer blink did. I don't play lotteries so I don't give a rats arse about it. Also attempting to tie the game down to US law when it's clearly an international product is just stupid. If it's not legal where you live don't play...
Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

Steijn
Quay Industries CAStabouts
397
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 14:08:00 -
[146] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:If Somerblink is so evil as some people portray them to be why are they so popular?
The fact that its SOMER is irrelevent, its the point that CCP are writing a blank cheque and giving it to an ingame 3rd party thats the issue. It wouldnt make a difference who they had decided to give those ships to, the whole idea is fundamentally flawed,.
CCP could give SOMER a top of the range Porsche or something. CCP will still get grief, but at least it wont be unbalancing what is supposed to be a sandbox game. A lot of people now will be genuinly concerned about who and which other in-game entities CCP are subsidising that arent known about. |

Abernie
Massively Incompetent
120
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 14:10:00 -
[147] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:All I see are goons metagamining in this thread because they didn't get the shiny and somer blink did. I don't play lotteries so I don't give a rats arse about it. Also attempting to tie the game down to US law when it's clearly an international product is just stupid. If it's not legal where you live don't play...
This issue has nothing to do with participating in lotteries. But thanks for letting us know you don't care about it at all. I'm sure many, myself included, were wondering. |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
409
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 15:04:00 -
[148] - Quote
Abernie wrote:Little Dragon Khamez wrote:All I see are goons metagamining in this thread because they didn't get the shiny and somer blink did. I don't play lotteries so I don't give a rats arse about it. Also attempting to tie the game down to US law when it's clearly an international product is just stupid. If it's not legal where you live don't play...
This issue has pretty much nothing to do with participating in lotteries. But thanks for letting us know you don't care about it at all. I'm sure many, myself included, were wondering.
All I'm doing is outlining the fact the goons are metagaming in order to get stuff they'd quite like to have, but is being allocated to someone else. These are the same people that keep on screaming 'sandbox' every five minutes. You can rest assured if the goons had been allocated the stuff and somer blink hadn't been there wouldn't be any threads about this at all. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

Khanh'rhh
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2218
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 15:07:00 -
[149] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:All I'm doing is outlining the fact the goons are metagaming in order to get stuff they'd quite like to have, but is being allocated to someone else. These are the same people that keep on screaming 'sandbox' every five minutes. You can rest assured if the goons had been allocated the stuff and somer blink hadn't been there wouldn't be any threads about this at all. We want no-one to have special treatment. If you had even the slightest sense of irony it should be tingling right about now, since it was a very determined posting effort by GSF members back in the day that stopped CCP just sweeping the T20 scandal under the rug.
You people are so blinded by your ridiculous hatred you don't even know when we're helping you. "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930 |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
409
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 15:25:00 -
[150] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Little Dragon Khamez wrote:All I'm doing is outlining the fact the goons are metagaming in order to get stuff they'd quite like to have, but is being allocated to someone else. These are the same people that keep on screaming 'sandbox' every five minutes. You can rest assured if the goons had been allocated the stuff and somer blink hadn't been there wouldn't be any threads about this at all. We want no-one to have special treatment. If you had even the slightest sense of irony it should be tingling right about now, since it was a very determined posting effort by GSF members back in the day that stopped CCP just sweeping the T20 scandal under the rug. You people are so blinded by your ridiculous hatred you don't even know when we're helping you.
No haters here sorry, also they day I need Goon help is the day I gnaw of my own hands with my teeth. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |