Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Roime
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
3541
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 11:08:00 -
[361] - Quote
Elana Maggal wrote:Weaselior wrote:Elana Maggal wrote:Green Gambit= wrote: Even with the POCOs, there's no insistance that you get involved with PvP. You can pay RvB to clear a POCO so you can claim it for your corp. Then you can tax it!
Give me a fukken break. Maybe this is why hi-sec Industrialists don't want to deal with the nul-sec sociopathic crowd ... what level of player interaction do you find acceptable in your vision of my little pony online the massively multiplayer singleplayer game This is the exact kind of nul-sec sheeeeet that players in hi-sec want to avoid. So much for a sand box where people can play the way the want eh? Not if you got Goon turds on the CSM ...
You can play the way you want. Now you have even more freedom, more choices, more ways to engage in the sandbox gameplay.
But all you can come up is some wacko goon-related tinfoilery and complain when you are given more freedom.
Notify-á-á You cannot do that while warping. |
Gigi Barbagrigia
Digital Oddity
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 11:57:00 -
[362] - Quote
Nice idea poorly implemented
- There's no cost associated with ownership, that's stupid. Either there needs to be fuel of some sort required for running POCO or protection tax to CONCORD as CCP[forgot who] calls it needs to be paid by the owner.
- Since POCOs follow reinforce mechanics wardec requirement doesn't hold water. Large entities move slower thus 48 hours grace period is way too much.
There will be no immediate GSF monopoly. Not because two squads, which in most cases will be enough to thwart an attack, couldn't get from VFK to Genesis in under an hour and that's not even using JCs but simply because of sheer size of the project. In the long run though, with no ownership cost, it would be silly not to install ISK printers at most if not all 'good' planets.
Then again, hisec is way too fragmented and maybe the 'threat' will force folks to pull head from the sand that makes this sandbox that some are so passionately defending.
As for GSF input; there are few people in the whole history of Goons that can claim any merit in creating ... well, another hisec basically and small maintenance crew. Majority however is crowd on par with empirers; just they hide behind PCs instead of CONCORD. Looking at posts themselves it's not hard to see who's who. |
May O'Neez
Flying Blacksmiths
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 12:17:00 -
[363] - Quote
Quote:You have distorted and destroyed what Hi sec was supposed to be in many peoples opinions.
many is not all, and is even less CCP's
I remember the WoD conference 2 years ago in Fanfest, and a CCP Dev stated that PVE and HiSec where merely 'Theme Park', ie a bootstrap for players. Plus you add several blogs which speaks about PvE changes in order to train to PVP mechanics, and Fanfest being focused on PvP ... you see the point.
EVE is aimed as being a WoT in Space within a one-shard sandbox. The PvE part is only there because CCP couldn't find a way to attract all people to PvP. I heard players in Fanfest being so proud of living in 0 and doing PvP that they qualified High Sec and PvE as having a "brain disease". They claimed that only PvP is fun and that other miss the point in the whole EVE. But they are neither representative of the full playbase, although being probably closer to CCP's or CSM.
~
Personnaly, I think that the biggest grieffer won't be Goons or other Null coallitions, but all the mercenary corps that do wardecs 24/7 in HS and are pretty installed in the area, hence having no trouble for logistics. These guys have no need to be big nor to be in alliance. They're not interrested to get money from POCOs so there's probability that some of them just claim in order to force people into PvP, they don't even need to build a new one behind, juste have to wait for the next guy. To these mercs the player-owned POCOs may just look like corpo ads promised to be wardecced. Regarding corpos offering services, there's possibility that some work together (like c1 decs, c2 offers to defends and c1/c2 share the gains), and in both cases (avoid or hire) the cost for prod corps is prohibitive.
To me, the PI will just be even less attractive in HS, except in some tight areas with heavy control by big corps. Small corps will just have to adapt. |
Wraith Lamented
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 13:06:00 -
[364] - Quote
This is absolute bunk: CCP just handed HiSec PI over to the massive corps and/or alliances like the Goons. Many people rely on PI to help build their bankroll so that they can eventually graduate into better ships with better modules. Its not enough that alliances like the Goons already own vast parts of nullsec and lowsec: now.. they get to impose themselves upon independent and small corps in HiSec too. Its not enough now that we don't hardly venture into lowsec for fear of getting ganked via gatecamps, or ganked in a mining belt whilst minding our own business. No, take away yet one more thing for a player to improve his stature in the game.
CCP: How is wardecing entities like the Goons even remotely feasible for small corps of 8 members, huh? Seriously??? And, lets say they do attack an interbus CS in Highsec to make room for their own... Concord ought to be there to crush them! Its unprovoked aggression!
"you can still play how you want?" NO, you cant! No longer will small potato guys like me be able to conduct industry unfettered in HiSec, without the imposition of mega-alliances and/or large corps. I NEED PI to fund my other adventures! "Well, if you have to rely on PI, you're doing something wrong...." Bug off! Says YOU. This isn't more freedom: its more pandering to sociopaths to enable them to further coerce and manipulate other players who do not have the experience or the inclination to engage in conflict. Some people STAY in HiSec, and out of Lowsec or Null, precisely because they want to avoid sociopathic aggression.
This is just so typical: the older players who have ALREADY MADE THEIR FORTUNES now get to dump on newer players trying to get a little ahead... in space that should be a relative safe haven.
THIS is a bridge too far. TOO FAR.
|
Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
429
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 13:23:00 -
[365] - Quote
No suspect flags = No fun
Typical high sec, every dummy and their brother tying to spam launch faster than the other guys when the CO goes boom. All to own a piece of poop that emits fart dust for taxes. |
Wraith Lamented
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 13:42:00 -
[366] - Quote
CCP... If you are going to just hand over HiSec CS over to mega corps and alliances you are pandering to, why stop there? Why not all of the Stations too? I mean, be consistent. So the NPC controlled CS can be sacked, but not the NPC Stations? Why not be entirely thorough and hand over the rest of HiSec too so that not only can we not conduct industry, but have nowhere to dock our ships, either?
Too Far.
|
Tex Steele
Demon-War-Lords Fatal Ascension
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 13:58:00 -
[367] - Quote
This is yet another BOHICA (Bend OVer Here It Comes Again) moment From CCP to the players of EVE.
This will severely damage the ability of single players and their alts to make ISK in the game by Running PI planets.
I can see one or two big corps, like the Merc corps, sweeping through vast areas of Empire, killing and replacing the POCOS, then taxing the single players out of existence. A 1-person corporation will have ZERO chance of declaring war on one of the bigger corps and taking down or taking back all the POCOs.
This move by CCP effectively Kills one aspect of the snigle player game in EVE. This is moving the game towards big corporations and more fighting. This is NOT a good thing for the single players and small corporations who depend upon PI as a primary source of income.
It is a crying shame that CCP cares so little for the players who truly enjoy ALL aspects of this game other than PvP.
I also have to ask: WHERE IS the CSM? After playing for several years, I am unconvinced that they are effectively representing our opinions. The only other alternative, which is more likely, is that CCP is simply not listening. This seems to be a pattern.
Thanks for NOTHING CCP. |
Nocxi
Machines of IX
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 14:03:00 -
[368] - Quote
I haven't read all the post, but no one seems to be bringing up a big point CCP has misses. Is the same standing requirement for POS in HiSec going to apply for POCO? If no, then why not? I am assuming there isn't, because it would have been said. That doesn't make any sense what so ever. So a corp/alliance with a -5 standing to Gallente can't put up a POS in 0.5 space for research, but Gallente is ok with the same corp/alliance putting up a POCO in 1.0 space and tax their own people to export items from their planet in their controlled space? How can that be justified? So a corp is considered enemies of a nation, and shot on site in HiSec can still put up a POCO and tax their people? Am I the only one that has a problem with this? |
Fix Lag
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
561
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 14:28:00 -
[369] - Quote
Tex Steele wrote:This is yet another BOHICA (Bend OVer Here It Comes Again) moment From CCP to the players of EVE.
This will severely damage the ability of single players and their alts to make ISK in the game by Running PI planets.
I can see one or two big corps, like the Merc corps, sweeping through vast areas of Empire, killing and replacing the POCOS, then taxing the single players out of existence. A 1-person corporation will have ZERO chance of declaring war on one of the bigger corps and taking down or taking back all the POCOs.
This move by CCP effectively Kills one aspect of the snigle player game in EVE. This is moving the game towards big corporations and more fighting. This is NOT a good thing for the single players and small corporations who depend upon PI as a primary source of income.
It is a crying shame that CCP cares so little for the players who truly enjoy ALL aspects of this game other than PvP.
I also have to ask: WHERE IS the CSM? After playing for several years, I am unconvinced that they are effectively representing our opinions. The only other alternative, which is more likely, is that CCP is simply not listening. This seems to be a pattern.
Thanks for NOTHING CCP.
I didn't realize FA was an alliance specializing in highsec activities. |
Fearless M0F0
Incursion PWNAGE Asc
57
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 14:32:00 -
[370] - Quote
This is a terrible idea and I encourage CCP to stop and think this thoroughly. You are creating a massive land grab and granting monopolies on empire resources to nullsec alliances... in exchange for nothing. This means professional trolls like the goons are going to take as many POCOs as they can, just to grief.
PI is terrible in empire, and now is going to be pretty much unbearable dealing with launchers and factory planets locked out.
|
|
Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1249
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 14:42:00 -
[371] - Quote
Tex Steele wrote:This is yet another BOHICA (Bend OVer Here It Comes Again) moment From CCP to the players of EVE.
This will severely damage the ability of single players and their alts to make ISK in the game by Running PI planets.
I can see one or two big corps, like the Merc corps, sweeping through vast areas of Empire, killing and replacing the POCOS, then taxing the single players out of existence. A 1-person corporation will have ZERO chance of declaring war on one of the bigger corps and taking down or taking back all the POCOs.
This move by CCP effectively Kills one aspect of the snigle player game in EVE. This is moving the game towards big corporations and more fighting. This is NOT a good thing for the single players and small corporations who depend upon PI as a primary source of income.
It is a crying shame that CCP cares so little for the players who truly enjoy ALL aspects of this game other than PvP.
I also have to ask: WHERE IS the CSM? After playing for several years, I am unconvinced that they are effectively representing our opinions. The only other alternative, which is more likely, is that CCP is simply not listening. This seems to be a pattern.
Thanks for NOTHING CCP.
Irony explosion.
Demon WAR Lords indeed. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal - Want to follow the latest scandals? @EVEAryth |
Dant Perst
Dark Matter Industrial Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 14:50:00 -
[372] - Quote
Just a bad idea. Power to tax is the power to destroy, and there are too many players in this game who will get a hard-on doing just that. I can also envision COs being destroyed in entire regions just for the "fun" of it. Too many downsides for those using high sec PI to achieve the means by which to enter the low sec and null sec game, and for those who do not have 3+ hours per day to mine (boring) and grind missions. This could be a deal-breaker for those of us who spend maybe 7 hours a week on EVE. Sounds like CCP needs some adult supervision in it's planning department. |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1370
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 15:06:00 -
[373] - Quote
Judging by some of 'alliance' posts in here, it would seem that CCP is intent on bringing null-sec ego war to hi-sec. This is not a signature. |
Wraith Lamented
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 15:12:00 -
[374] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Judging by some of 'alliance' posts in here, it would seem that CCP is intent on bringing null-sec ego war to hi-sec.
Small corps and independents wont have the means to even dec the large corps/alliances controlling the POCOs
I was venting in npc corp and the older players are loving this... they have their fortunes made, so suck it for everyone else. Their attitude seems to be that we have to either play Eve the same way they do, or not at all. Thats rich.
CCP just handed HiSec over to smug sociopaths... |
Shamus en Divalone
Dip Dip Potatoe Chip
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 15:15:00 -
[375] - Quote
In order to erect a new POCO for a corporation in high sec would standings with that empire be required? |
Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
639
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 15:17:00 -
[376] - Quote
Shamus en Divalone wrote:In order to erect a new POCO for a corporation in high sec would standings with that empire be required?
No. Mangala Undocked |
Fix Lag
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
562
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 15:27:00 -
[377] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Irony explosion.
Demon WAR Lords indeed.
This is the price of having an empire, I guess. |
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:10:00 -
[378] - Quote
Tex Steele wrote:This is yet another BOHICA (Bend OVer Here It Comes Again) moment From CCP to the players of EVE.
This will severely damage the ability of single players and their alts to make ISK in the game by Running PI planets.
I can see one or two big corps, like the Merc corps, sweeping through vast areas of Empire, killing and replacing the POCOS, then taxing the single players out of existence. A 1-person corporation will have ZERO chance of declaring war on one of the bigger corps and taking down or taking back all the POCOs.
This move by CCP effectively Kills one aspect of the snigle player game in EVE. This is moving the game towards big corporations and more fighting. This is NOT a good thing for the single players and small corporations who depend upon PI as a primary source of income.
It is a crying shame that CCP cares so little for the players who truly enjoy ALL aspects of this game other than PvP.
I also have to ask: WHERE IS the CSM? After playing for several years, I am unconvinced that they are effectively representing our opinions. The only other alternative, which is more likely, is that CCP is simply not listening. This seems to be a pattern.
Thanks for NOTHING CCP. I would highly recommend posting this on your npc corp posting alt next time |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5130
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:10:00 -
[379] - Quote
Elana Maggal wrote: This is the exact kind of nul-sec sheeeeet that players in hi-sec want to avoid. So much for a sand box where people can play the way the want eh? Not if you got Goon turds on the CSM ...
that's why it's so delightful
i will savor each and every isk we extract from you |
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:12:00 -
[380] - Quote
seriously, posting like that on a cfc dude was probably not very smart |
|
Hoofd Klant
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:14:00 -
[381] - Quote
Fix Lag wrote:Pirate's Bunny wrote:Fix Lag wrote:Highsec is not being nerfed as this transfers the money from POCO customs fees from NPCs to players. It doesn't transfer it, it takes more and gives it to player, npc tax is still on it. There's a fairly small tax for the NPCs to prevent 0% havens and to guarantee lowsec POCOs are superior, but the gist of it is players now have the power to collect the bulk of the POCO transfer tax.
Actually without the skill (which most new bros won't have) it's 10% to export and 5% to import plus what ever additional tax the corp that owns the POCO puts on it....read the devblog it's in paragraph 7. |
Khador Vess
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
80
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:15:00 -
[382] - Quote
Wraith Lamented wrote: "you can still play how you want?" NO, you cant! No longer will small potato guys like me be able to conduct industry unfettered in HiSec, without the imposition of mega-alliances and/or large corps. I NEED PI to fund my other adventures! "Well, if you have to rely on PI, you're doing something wrong...." Bug off! Says YOU. This isn't more freedom: its more pandering to sociopaths to enable them to further coerce and manipulate other players who do not have the experience or the inclination to engage in conflict. Some people STAY in HiSec, and out of Lowsec or Null, precisely because they want to avoid sociopathic aggression.
This is just so typical: the older players who have ALREADY MADE THEIR FORTUNES now get to dump on newer players trying to get a little ahead... in space that should be a relative safe haven.
THIS is a bridge too far. TOO FAR.
Firstly:
You seem to be under the illusion that life or indeed internet spaceships is meant to be fair and owes you something... newsflash... it doesnt.
Secondly:
Goons, RvB, etc. will pick and choose what they own and where... if they make the tax too much then people will go elsewhere.
To think that even all the big alliances together could get 100% coverage of hi-sec where they cannot defend it it naive in the extreme.
Also, if PI is your main or even a significant income then my friend unless your in a wormhole or null YOURDOINGITWRONG
tldr: suck it up, grab some land, if someone tries to take it away fight or flee, make friends and stand together or fold and walk away. Hell RvB are always out for fun wardecs so why not talk to our glorious leaders about our very competitive war assistance rates. We might even make you "an offer you cant refuse" for your POCO. I used to have a forum sig, but CCP SocksFour stole it.... |
Soulpirate
Interstellar Booty Hunters
312
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:44:00 -
[383] - Quote
Mangala Solaris wrote:Shamus en Divalone wrote:In order to erect a new POCO for a corporation in high sec would standings with that empire be required? No. Well, it should be required.
Also, the NPC tax should be converted into a cost of operation for the owner of the POCO.
Instead of PI dude paying X% to NPC AND Y% to the POCO holder, the POCO holder should pay the NPC cost, and build that into what they in turn charge the PI people to use their POCO. This way if they set their tax too high and noone uses their POCO's they are on the hook for the cost, thus preventing(or at least slowing) certain groups from holding HS POCO's just to set unrealistic taxes with the intent of driving up certain material costs.
|
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
232
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 17:50:00 -
[384] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:Mangala Solaris wrote:Shamus en Divalone wrote:In order to erect a new POCO for a corporation in high sec would standings with that empire be required? No. Well, it should be required. Also, the NPC tax should be converted into a cost of operation for the owner of the POCO. Instead of PI dude paying X% to NPC AND Y% to the POCO holder, the POCO holder should pay the NPC cost, and build that into what they in turn charge the PI people to use their POCO. This way if they set their tax too high and noone uses their POCO's they are on the hook for the cost, thus preventing(or at least slowing) certain groups from holding HS POCO's just to set unrealistic taxes with the intent of driving up certain material costs. fyi
under this ridiculous suggestion
if the poco was not used
the npc tax bill to the pocohaver would be zero (0) isk
this would have a net change of precisely bupkis and would not serve to punish owning large numbers of pocos like you are poorly attempting to make happen |
Soulpirate
Interstellar Booty Hunters
312
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 18:07:00 -
[385] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Soulpirate wrote:Mangala Solaris wrote:Shamus en Divalone wrote:In order to erect a new POCO for a corporation in high sec would standings with that empire be required? No. Well, it should be required. Also, the NPC tax should be converted into a cost of operation for the owner of the POCO. Instead of PI dude paying X% to NPC AND Y% to the POCO holder, the POCO holder should pay the NPC cost, and build that into what they in turn charge the PI people to use their POCO. This way if they set their tax too high and noone uses their POCO's they are on the hook for the cost, thus preventing(or at least slowing) certain groups from holding HS POCO's just to set unrealistic taxes with the intent of driving up certain material costs. fyi under this ridiculous suggestion if the poco was not used the npc tax bill to the pocohaver would be zero (0) isk this would have a net change of precisely bupkis and would not serve to punish owning large numbers of pocos like you are poorly attempting to make happen What I meant was build a cost into owning the POCO that the owner would have to factor in to what they charge people to use it.
So, if you say, I dunno... wanted to hold all the lava planets in HS and lock everyone out to drive up the resource prices, you should be paying through the nose to hold all those inactive POCO's. |
Khador Vess
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 18:42:00 -
[386] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote: So, if you say, I dunno... wanted to hold all the lava planets in HS and lock everyone out to drive up the resource prices, you should be paying through the nose to hold all those inactive POCO's.
you already have because your POCO cost you 100m isk to make and upgrade. If no one uses it, you have 5, 10, 20% of sweet FA
I used to have a forum sig, but CCP SocksFour stole it.... |
Pheadra Aurilen
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 18:46:00 -
[387] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:Mangala Solaris wrote:Shamus en Divalone wrote:In order to erect a new POCO for a corporation in high sec would standings with that empire be required? No. Also, the NPC tax should be converted into a cost of operation for the owner of the POCO. Instead of PI dude paying X% to NPC AND Y% to the POCO holder, the POCO holder should pay the NPC cost, and build that into what they in turn charge the PI people to use their POCO. This way if they set their tax too high and noone uses their POCO's they are on the hook for the cost, thus preventing(or at least slowing) certain groups from holding HS POCO's just to set unrealistic taxes with the intent of driving up certain material costs.
This would actually be much closer to RW historical examples of the privatisation of tax collection, such as Tax Farming. Typically a Tax Farmer would buy the right to collect the taxes in a region from the Government for a particular period of time. This suited both parties, the Tax Farmer would obviously hope to make more than they paid for the right from the taxes they collected, the Government, on the other hand, would get cash up front without needing to employ its own officials, as well as transferring the risks associated with any economic downturn to the Tax Farmer. |
Digger Dan
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 18:53:00 -
[388] - Quote
Should there be a niche for low-intensity players who want to do a little PI for make-to-use production?
I started doing PI to get a dependable supply of ingredients for small-scale T2 production, for my own use and maybe, eventually, for sharing with pick-up gangs, using T2 BPCs I invent myself, with datacores from my research agents, decryptors from Data sites I run, AsteroidStuff I mine and refine myself, etc. I hope to ninja-mine wormholes for Megacyte, as I used to do in null-sec until the gate-camps became impassible. Should I be forced to grind (mining, ratting, whatever) to generate ISK so I can buy PI-Stuff, as well as MoonGooStuff, from the cartels?
The existing rocket-launch facility would be ok for small-scale exporting, but maybe there could be small-scale importing too?
How about a T1 disposable Smuggler Landing Container? Perhaps a family of SLCs, in various sizes?
Perhaps Launchpads should be able to launch larger rockets than ControlCenters?
I guess I still have to buy MoonGooStuff for T2 production, so maybe I'm just fooling myself about being able to make-to-use. Guess I've been counting on income from PI to finance my MoonGooStuff purchases.
I suppose the whole small-scale-PI business will become moot soon anyway, when CCP make all PI planetside installations conquerable or destroyable by Dust 514 players.
Plainly, IMDOINGITWRONG, for values of WRONG, and should be sent to Room 101 until I doubleplusgoodthink. |
Mel Hython
MIlicia Ignotum Foramen
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:03:00 -
[389] - Quote
Please, stop to giving more and more part of the game to the large corps/alliances.
I love this game, and I have being playing it a lot of years, but i have no time to waste in boring things like watch for the frontier of my alliance, or being a servant of the big bosses. I want to do my little industrial work whenever i can.
The new skill is absurd if the player can put their own POCOs and set abussive tax for blocking any 'interesting' planet.
Please, limit heavily the amount of tax -no more than the double of the current level- the player can fix.
And, please, give us a tool to identify the origin of which ever product of the market, one easy and obvius tools -like a filter- if the war is possible in all the aspect of the game i demand that economical boycott to the big bosses.
WE REALLY NEED A TOOL TO DO BOYCOTT. PLEASE CREATE IT.
If you want war every where, accept that the economical war is a way to do it. |
Soulpirate
Interstellar Booty Hunters
314
|
Posted - 2013.10.03 19:33:00 -
[390] - Quote
Khador Vess wrote:Soulpirate wrote: So, if you say, I dunno... wanted to hold all the lava planets in HS and lock everyone out to drive up the resource prices, you should be paying through the nose to hold all those inactive POCO's.
you already have because your POCO cost you 100m isk to make and upgrade. If no one uses it, you have 5, 10, 20% of sweet FA You're confusing startup costs with operating costs of which there is none atm for the POCO owner.
No standing required + No operating cost to the POCO owner = Needs fixing
However, it wont change, because the people who hatched this idea are the very ones who plan on abusing it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |