| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 66 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

tEcHnOkRaT
Aliastra Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 19:50:00 -
[1711] - Quote
the traking enchancers fallof modifier needs to be nerfd to 15% - 20% and add a script to traking computers with fallof mod maybe
and arty needs to loose some alpha and rails gain some alpha but not an equal number an all turret classes small, medium and large need to be looked at seperatly cuz small hybrids are more then fine maybe a bit too fine :) |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 06:47:00 -
[1712] - Quote
I think that blaster DPS is fine but needs a better optimal range. Take for example an Abaddon in comparison. It does near the same DPS as a Megathron would with Pulse lasers, only difference is that it can shoot 60KM. I don't see much fairness in that. TL;DR so I do not have to have a long and drawn out rant: Give blasters better optimal and falloff, Please. |

Super Chair
Project Cerberus Caldari State Capturing
170
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 07:26:00 -
[1713] - Quote
Naga sucks, talos over powered. Buff naga. |

Archare
SKEET ELITE Sk33t Fl33t
69
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 07:32:00 -
[1714] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:Naga sucks, talos over powered. Buff naga.
wrong thread mate
anyways i think hybrids and gallente ships still need more tweaking overall. There has definitely been a marked improvement. I think part of the problem now, or at least the biggest one is the platforms that use hybrids.
Railguns are looking better on paper and are comparable to pulse lasers except for the tracking. Still haven't used those for pvp yet though as i haven't found any reason to bring railguns on the field. |

Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 07:44:00 -
[1715] - Quote
de4deye wrote:I think that blaster DPS is fine but needs a better optimal range. Take for example an Abaddon in comparison. It does near the same DPS as a Megathron would with Pulse lasers, only difference is that it can shoot 60KM. I don't see much fairness in that. TL;DR so I do not have to have a long and drawn out rant: Give blasters better optimal and falloff, Please.
This will resolve the issue....
For Blasters increase the Turret optimal by 20% and Falloff by 30% rather than tweaking the ammo. Hybrids (blasters) lack RANGE against Lasors/projectiles. Therefore they are not used in fleets against other DPS platforms. It may be fine for skirmish but skirmish is a totally different battle type.
Hybrids (Rails) lack DPS against Lasors/Projectiles even if they got range they need 20% increase to their damage multiplier since the damage types of Thermal and Kinetic have high base resists. |

Mikal Morataya
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 08:51:00 -
[1716] - Quote
de4deye wrote:I think that blaster DPS is fine but needs a better optimal range. Take for example an Abaddon in comparison. It does near the same DPS as a Megathron would with Pulse lasers, only difference is that it can shoot 60KM. I don't see much fairness in that.
The thing is the Abaddon is very cap heavy with lasers, more so than the Mega with blasters. Reading these threads sometimes makes me smile and its like a MAKE MY RACE ULTIMATE AT ALL. If you really like the Abaddon, train for it. That's the beauty of Eve. It's interesting lots of null fleets fit Arty to the Abandon, as has been mentioned Arty is king.
As for blaster boats suffering at the hand of nuets, won't someone think of the laser boats. :)
Let's just give hybrids the range and alpha of Arty, the instant ammo load of lasers, all dmg types, the killing power it has up close and force all pilots to fly Gallente :) |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
856
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 12:02:00 -
[1717] - Quote
Mikal Morataya wrote:de4deye wrote:I think that blaster DPS is fine but needs a better optimal range. Take for example an Abaddon in comparison. It does near the same DPS as a Megathron would with Pulse lasers, only difference is that it can shoot 60KM. I don't see much fairness in that. The thing is the Abaddon is very cap heavy with lasers, more so than the Mega with blasters. Reading these threads sometimes makes me smile and its like a MAKE MY RACE ULTIMATE AT ALL. If you really like the Abaddon, train for it. That's the beauty of Eve. It's interesting lots of null fleets fit Arty to the Abandon, as has been mentioned Arty is king. As for blaster boats suffering at the hand of nuets, won't someone think of the laser boats. :) Let's just give hybrids the range and alpha of Arty, the instant ammo load of lasers, all dmg types, the killing power it has up close and force all pilots to fly Gallente :)
Ho you will excuse us for thinking that a pulse harby able to fully shoot/dms at 45km that manages to be neuted even by a t1 battleship (28km with faction neut), then the harby pilot really sucks.
|

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 13:58:00 -
[1718] - Quote
Mikal Morataya wrote:de4deye wrote:I think that blaster DPS is fine but needs a better optimal range. Take for example an Abaddon in comparison. It does near the same DPS as a Megathron would with Pulse lasers, only difference is that it can shoot 60KM. I don't see much fairness in that. The thing is the Abaddon is very cap heavy with lasers, more so than the Mega with blasters. Reading these threads sometimes makes me smile and its like a MAKE MY RACE ULTIMATE AT ALL. If you really like the Abaddon, train for it. That's the beauty of Eve. It's interesting lots of null fleets fit Arty to the Abandon, as has been mentioned Arty is king. As for blaster boats suffering at the hand of nuets, won't someone think of the laser boats. :) Let's just give hybrids the range and alpha of Arty, the instant ammo load of lasers, all dmg types, the killing power it has up close and force all pilots to fly Gallente :)
Now, now, calm down. I can fly an abaddon, along with every other races BS, Hac, what have you. Abaddons are heavy on cap no derp, I'm not talking about that, as blasters are high on cap usage too - it makes no real argument. The only null fleets that fit arty to abaddons are the noobs who trained for a Maelstrom and were forced to use an abaddon and cannot use T2 Pulses, As the T2 Arty will do more DPS than T1 pulse lasers. I am not a ranting noob, like some, who doesn't know what they are talking about and saying to "BUFF MY RACE" - Gallente isn't my "Race" as they suck something aweful since a couple years back. The Only ship that any sane Gallente pilot will fly is an Ishtar. I will disregard your non productive rant and assume that you are just a noob who has nothing better to do. I stick by what I said, Blasters need a Falloff and Optimal range buff to them and their ammo types should not have such restrictive range bonuses.
-de4d |

thoth rothschild
First Aid Emergency Service
67
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:46:00 -
[1719] - Quote
after posting and loosing a long post to the forum gang i won't type it again  |

tEcHnOkRaT
Aliastra Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:50:00 -
[1720] - Quote
always Ctrl+C before posting if its gone Ctrl+V :) |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
856
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:58:00 -
[1721] - Quote
tEcHnOkRaT wrote:the traking enchancers fallof modifier needs to be nerfd to 15% - 20% and add a script to traking computers with fallof mod maybe
and arty needs to loose some alpha and rails gain some alpha but not an equal number an all turret classes small, medium and large need to be looked at seperatly cuz small hybrids are more then fine maybe a bit too fine :)
Exactly what everyone said from the begining, small rails/blasters were ok, only ships needed some tweaks. Now we have a 75mm T2 Gatling+spike Enyo that NEVER misses his target flying at +/-5km/s hitting his target at +/- 30km with 200dps+/- .... c'mon...wtbh? |

Kahz Niverrah
Viziam Amarr Empire
182
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 17:18:00 -
[1722] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:Ho you will excuse us for thinking that a pulse harby able to fully shoot/dms at 45km that manages to be neuted even by a t1 battleship (28km with faction neut), then the harby pilot really sucks. Please show me this mythical pulse harbinger with 45km optimal.
Since harbingers have to use focused medium pulses due to gimped fitting, mine only has a 20km optimal with scorch. Hell, my legion with heavy pulses only hits to 34km. 45km is the optimal for abaddons with mega pulses, not this fairy tale 60km number that gets kicked around.
I find it funny how everyone who complains that scorch is OP actually has no idea what ranges scorch actually hits at. I don't always post on the forums, but when I do, I post with my main. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
856
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 17:23:00 -
[1723] - Quote
Kahz Niverrah wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:Ho you will excuse us for thinking that a pulse harby able to fully shoot/dms at 45km that manages to be neuted even by a t1 battleship (28km with faction neut), then the harby pilot really sucks. Please show me this mythical pulse harbinger with 45km optimal. Since harbingers have to use focused medium pulses due to gimped fitting, mine only has a 20km optimal with scorch. Hell, my legion with heavy pulses only hits to 34km. I find it funny how everyone who complains that scorch is OP actually has no idea what ranges scorch actually hits at.
Don't you know that the only ships that count are those shield fitted so they can use lows for dps mods? 
Everything else is for noobs, sry I will not discuss with you any longer you lack of bit vet attitude 
|

Kahz Niverrah
Viziam Amarr Empire
182
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 17:24:00 -
[1724] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:Don't you know that the only ships that count are those shield fitted so they can use lows for dps mods?  Everything else is for noobs, sry I will not discuss with you any longer you lack of bit vet attitude  Touche. I don't always post on the forums, but when I do, I post with my main. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 18:52:00 -
[1725] - Quote
Kahz Niverrah wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:Ho you will excuse us for thinking that a pulse harby able to fully shoot/dms at 45km that manages to be neuted even by a t1 battleship (28km with faction neut), then the harby pilot really sucks. Please show me this mythical pulse harbinger with 45km optimal. Since harbingers have to use focused medium pulses due to gimped fitting, mine only has a 20km optimal with scorch. Hell, my legion with heavy pulses only hits to 34km. 45km is the optimal for abaddons with mega pulses, not this fairy tale 60km number that gets kicked around. I find it funny how everyone who complains that scorch is OP actually has no idea what ranges scorch actually hits at.
Let me elaborate. To find out your effective range on your ship that you will hit good damage at, you Add up your Falloff+Optimal range. 60Km is the range an abaddon reaches for a pilot with moderate skills and 2 tracking computers with no scripts, as is a standard hellcat fitting. A Good pilot will hit around 75+km. If you are only able to hit 45km with an abaddon, you are both fitting wrong and have poor skillpoints. |

Kahz Niverrah
Viziam Amarr Empire
182
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:01:00 -
[1726] - Quote
de4deye wrote:Let me elaborate. To find out your effective range on your ship that you will hit good damage at, you Add up your Falloff+Optimal range. 60Km is the range an abaddon reaches for a pilot with moderate skills and 2 tracking computers with no scripts, as is a standard hellcat fitting. A Good pilot will hit around 75+km. If you are only able to hit 45km with an abaddon, you are both fitting wrong and have poor skillpoints. If you want to get technical, it's optimal + (2 * falloff). At optimal + falloff, you're doing 50% damage. Everyone is quoting the Abaddon's paper DPS from EFT, which drops off once optimal is exceeded. WIth max skills, an Abaddon pilot with scorch has a 45km optimal. With 2 tracking computers, it's 52km. Loading range scripts bumps that up to 58km.
Also, you need tons of logi to support Abaddons since they cap themselves out REALLY quickly. How many cap transfers are required to keep arty fleets firing? Yeah. I don't always post on the forums, but when I do, I post with my main. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:06:00 -
[1727] - Quote
Kahz Niverrah wrote:de4deye wrote:Let me elaborate. To find out your effective range on your ship that you will hit good damage at, you Add up your Falloff+Optimal range. 60Km is the range an abaddon reaches for a pilot with moderate skills and 2 tracking computers with no scripts, as is a standard hellcat fitting. A Good pilot will hit around 75+km. If you are only able to hit 45km with an abaddon, you are both fitting wrong and have poor skillpoints. If you want to get technical, it's optimal + (2 * falloff). At optimal + falloff, you're doing 50% damage. Everyone is quoting the Abaddon's paper DPS from EFT, which drops off once optimal is exceeded. WIth max skills, an Abaddon pilot with scorch has a 45km optimal. With 2 tracking computers, it's 52km. At 65km with max skill and 2 TCs, you're doing half damage. So basically, you're wrong.
So you have flown abaddon in large fleets that are hellcat fitted how many times?  I'm sorry that you have no idea what you are talking about and are under the illusion of intelligence, but would you please let people who actually can fly these ships and have flown them and against them many times talk about them. Rather than posting as an EFT warrior who has most likely 0 experience with the ships he is talking about. Just please take your inner thoughts and express them to your brain alone, then rethink again before you repost - otherwise, silence your heretic tongue.
I see in your edit you said that they need cap transfers. Abaddons fit cap boosters to them to keep their cap up, which lasts longer than 90% of the fights I've been in with an abaddon. An abaddon only resorts to cap transfers after it has been in multiple engagements or has ran out of cap boosters due to an engagement that lasted too long.
I'm not trying to down you, It is only that you are simply wrong and are arguing for the sake of argument. |

Kahz Niverrah
Viziam Amarr Empire
182
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:08:00 -
[1728] - Quote
de4deye wrote:[So you have flown abaddon in large fleets that are hellcat fitted how many times?  I'm sorry that you have no idea what you are talking about and are under the illusion of intelligence, but would you please let people who actually can fly these ships and have flown them and against them many times talk about them. Rather than posting as an EFT warrior who has most likely 0 experience with the ships he is talking about. Just please take your inner thoughts and express them to your brain alone, then rethink again before you repost - otherwise, silence your heretic tongue. Dude, you are terrible. Your reply was the equivalent of "NO U". Try using facts next time. It makes you look like less of a ****. I don't always post on the forums, but when I do, I post with my main. |

Kahz Niverrah
Viziam Amarr Empire
182
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:16:00 -
[1729] - Quote
de4deye wrote:[I'm not trying to down you, It is only that you are simply wrong and are arguing for the sake of argument. Pot, meet kettle.
I don't always post on the forums, but when I do, I post with my main. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:21:00 -
[1730] - Quote
Kahz Niverrah wrote:de4deye wrote:[So you have flown abaddon in large fleets that are hellcat fitted how many times?  I'm sorry that you have no idea what you are talking about and are under the illusion of intelligence, but would you please let people who actually can fly these ships and have flown them and against them many times talk about them. Rather than posting as an EFT warrior who has most likely 0 experience with the ships he is talking about. Just please take your inner thoughts and express them to your brain alone, then rethink again before you repost - otherwise, silence your heretic tongue. Dude, you are terrible. Your reply was the equivalent of "NO U". Try using facts next time. It makes you look like less of a ****. EDIT: Oh, you're a drake blob pilot. Now I get why you hate the abaddon so much. But please, continue to "educate" us. from your killboard, I see you are an amarr pilot. However you only fly legions 9/10 times it seem and rarely ever touched an abaddon and it has only been in small skirmishes. I fly all ships that the fleet calls for, be it Drakes, Abaddons, Guardians, Scimitars, Basilisks, Falcon, Carrier, or Dread.
Before you continue, I'd like you to know that I do not want Amarr to be nerfed at all, they are fine and nerfing anything is a bad idea. I am only saying that Blasters need a generous optimal and falloff buffing. I lvoe the abaddon, I fly it alot. Recently fleets have been calling for Alpha fleets and Heavy Skirmish sheild fleets more often than Abaddon and guardian fleets. I have no bias toward any race, I just understand that Blasters are gimpy compared to everything else.
|

Kahz Niverrah
Viziam Amarr Empire
182
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:25:00 -
[1731] - Quote
de4deye wrote:I am only saying that Blasters need a generous optimal and falloff buffing. My concern with buffing blaster range so that it can hit at mega pulse range is the already superior damage and tracking of blasters. If blasters get what would likely be a 2x range buff, would tracking and damage be nerfed?
I don't always post on the forums, but when I do, I post with my main. |

Dare Devel
Perkone Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:42:00 -
[1732] - Quote
Kahz Niverrah wrote:de4deye wrote:I am only saying that Blasters need a generous optimal and falloff buffing. My concern with buffing blaster range so that it can hit at mega pulse range is the already superior damage and tracking of blasters. If blasters get what would likely be a 2x range buff, would tracking and damage be nerfed?
Really I wouldn't mind a damage reduction since that would be fair. Tracking is fine as it is now. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:48:00 -
[1733] - Quote
Dare Devel wrote:Kahz Niverrah wrote:de4deye wrote:I am only saying that Blasters need a generous optimal and falloff buffing. My concern with buffing blaster range so that it can hit at mega pulse range is the already superior damage and tracking of blasters. If blasters get what would likely be a 2x range buff, would tracking and damage be nerfed? Really I wouldn't mind a damage reduction since that would be fair. Tracking is fine as it is now.
Yeah, Damage isn't the problem for blasters - Getting in range to do your damage is so tricky that it isn't worth it. Hence why no one flys Gallente anymore. Considering that just about every other race is "Sit back and shoot, Orbit at range", Gallente must approach with no transversal and take all kinds of hellfire. As I said, I simply will not fly any Gallente ship except for an Ishtar, it is just not worth the effort.
Refer to the top 20 ships used this month: (Eve-Kill Stats are generated from 2012-01-1 to 2012-01-18)
1 Drake 109549 2 Maelstrom 79771 3 Tengu 76807 4 Hurricane 64196 5 Abaddon 45218 6 Armageddon 39188 7 Tornado 27983 8 Scimitar 22620 9 Tempest 22342 10 Zealot 18700 11 Sabre 17940 12 Huginn 14834 13 Cynabal 13142 14 Loki 12404 15 Hound 12089 16 Manticore 11780 17 Vagabond 11334 18 Rapier 10987 19 Lachesis 10954 Oh look, A Gallente ship! It doesn't use blasters tho... 20 Rifter 10500
TL;DR: Caldari is good for a Drake and a Tengu Amarr is good For Abaddons, Geddons, and Zealots(Ahax) Minmatar is good for everything Gallente is good for nothing
If you say that blasters do not need a buff, I say "Drugs are bad, Mmkay?". |

Xtover
Macabre Votum Against ALL Authorities
67
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 20:48:00 -
[1734] - Quote
There's the vindi, but only if you don't mind risking a 1.5bil ship...
(then again it is half minmatar...) |

tEcHnOkRaT
Aliastra Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 21:12:00 -
[1735] - Quote
Xtover wrote:There's the vindi, but only if you don't mind risking a 1.5bil ship...
(then again it is half minmatar...)
poor vindi the price has been speculated so high
and hybrids still suck  |

Hamox
The Scope Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 22:12:00 -
[1736] - Quote
Hey, we now have the Gal Frigs :) By the way: Didn't a lot people say long time ago that small Blasters are fine and that generall changes to all Blasters and Ammo might be a bit too much for them? I just thought about it and it is a bit funny how the community predicts situations and CPP doesn't listen. Now what might happen: In a few weeks they realize that medium hybrids needs some more love but instead of changing medium weapons they just boost Null and Void in generall and improve small Blasters once more.
I still wonder why changes are made to the Ammo in generall instead of looking at the weapons directly and balancing small, medium and large independently. Wouldn't this make more sense? Just asking... |

Zircon Dasher
Zirconia Trade Group
73
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 22:20:00 -
[1737] - Quote
People who think the "Top 20" list is meaningful make me happy. If it were not for the hordes of people who fail to take an applied statistics course during thier lifetimes, I would not have a job irl.
ty :hugs: |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 23:09:00 -
[1738] - Quote
Zircon Dasher wrote:People who think the "Top 20" list is meaningful make me happy. If it were not for the hordes of people who fail to take an applied statistics course during thier lifetimes, I would not have a job irl.
ty :hugs:
All this shows is that they are not in demand for fleet at all - Not that they are not used in general. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
856
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 08:33:00 -
[1739] - Quote
Kahz Niverrah wrote:de4deye wrote:I am only saying that Blasters need a generous optimal and falloff buffing. My concern with buffing blaster range so that it can hit at mega pulse range is the already superior damage and tracking of blasters. If blasters get what would likely be a 2x range buff, would tracking and damage be nerfed?
People stop your paranoia plz, no one serious wants to have pulse range or AC's range and more dmg, we (the serious ones if you want it) ask enough range and dmg at med fight range witch is 30/35km max, just enough to fear the crap out of meta gamers with faction points witch only pleasure is like self sex, pointing you at long range (faction point 30km) where you can do nothing at all and slowly kill you.
So if you're one of those or an 8 years old little boy/girls I understand this will hurt your tralala. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
856
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 08:45:00 -
[1740] - Quote
Zircon Dasher wrote:People who think the "Top 20" list is meaningful make me happy. If it were not for the hordes of people who fail to take an applied statistics course during thier lifetimes, I would not have a job irl.
ty :hugs:
Statistics and people masturbating their brains with are useless to humanity, they're the first ones to hide underground when thing go wrong, they can barely survive if their car engine is broken in the middle of no where ...
Now, people using those with good intentions and giving humanity tools to become better, those actually have some nobel prices. Everything else is just cave people trying to dominate their neighbor with words a new V12 and tons of crap their future grave doesn't care at all...neither I.
If only painful/slow deadly hills were intelligent and could choose their target...I'd like to be the one that liquefies their victim from the inside in a horrible pain 
Halala... |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 66 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |