EVE Search - Sticky:Dev blog: Fortune Favors the Bold

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Sticky:Dev blog: Fortune Favors the Bold

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 8 post(s)
Darth Kilth Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans 165	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:01:00 - [31] - Quote 3 High slots but only 2 turrets? Why won't you let me have 3 miners equipped!
Zeera Tomb-Raider Aliastra Gallente Federation 20	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:02:00 - [32] - Quote I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think.
Owen Levanth Federated Deep Space Explorations 132	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:04:00 - [33] - Quote Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think. Don't worry, my industry alt will make sure the prize is reasonable. Trust me.
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 7216	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:04:00 - [34] - Quote Darth Kilth wrote: 3 High slots but only 2 turrets? Why won't you let me have 3 miners equipped! because it fits a covops cloak Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.
Weaselior GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 7217	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:05:00 - [35] - Quote mkint wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: So will the added Mexallon in Arkonor affect the importing of Mexallon into null sec? Will this give sov a greater sense of independence from other zones of space? Why should any section of space at all be independent from any other section of space? No other section of space has that, including those sections higher-risk than in the big blue donut. "i know something about risk" said the npc alt oh man that was a good one Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.
Kynric Sky Fighters Sky Syndicate 74	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:05:00 - [36] - Quote In before rant about "afk cloaky miners."
Arronicus Ravens' Nest Outlaw Horizon. 929	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:06:00 - [37] - Quote Lady Oremond wrote: Why doesn't it have 3 turret slots? Do you also ask why the stealth bombers don't have 4 launcher slots? 2 miners and a cloak. Seems like a bit of a no brainer to me.
mkint 1170	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:07:00 - [38] - Quote Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think. covops cloak is one of the most powerful lowsec survival tools there is, especially on a frigate hull. Watch local, watch d-scan. No point of ship balance can cure stupid. Maxim 34: If you're leaving scorch-marks, you need a bigger gun.
mkint 1170	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:10:00 - [39] - Quote Weaselior wrote: mkint wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: So will the added Mexallon in Arkonor affect the importing of Mexallon into null sec? Will this give sov a greater sense of independence from other zones of space? Why should any section of space at all be independent from any other section of space? No other section of space has that, including those sections higher-risk than in the big blue donut. "i know something about risk" said the npc alt oh man that was a good one If you want a discussion about risk, I'm game for that. perception of risk =/= actual risk, and I think you know this, and like to maintain the misconception for your own benefit. However, that's off topic for this thread. Maxim 34: If you're leaving scorch-marks, you need a bigger gun.
Benny Ohu Chaotic Tranquility 3139	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:11:00 - [40] - Quote oh, can we look forwards to having -100% cloak cpu role bonuses on covops and recons?
Destoya Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion 264	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:13:00 - [41] - Quote Weaselior wrote: mkint wrote: T2 dessies have lower DPS and tanks than T1 dessies, as do blops and their counterparts. I haven't done a side-by-side of every ship, but I guarantee there's a devquote saying that T2 shouldn't completely obsolete T1's. Also devquotes saying that balancing solely on price is a stupid idea. t2 destroyers (we are not babies here, we can pronounce words) have a completely unique role, as do blops however the standard t2 ship is something like the ishtar (strictly better than the vexor) the mackinaw (strictly better than the retriever) etc Just for the record, interdictors in gank, no bubble, fits outclass their T1 counterparts quite soundly, with the exception of the flycatcher and heretic (though those are still stronger combat ships than the T1 ones). In fits with MWD and a scram as a minimum, Eris is 703 DPS with equal HP to the 580 DPS catalyst, or 677 DPS with 50% more HP than the catalyst. This isn't even considering the innate MWD signature or resist bonuses of the interdictors.
Jagoff Haverford Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team 141	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:14:00 - [42] - Quote Quick question about one line in the stats for the Prospect: Quote: -100% Cloaking Device CPU use When I first started playing, all of the Cover Ops ships had something like this stat, only with odd percentages like 97.8% reduced CPU. CCP eventually did away with these bonuses, because they were kind of confusing. Now it seems like you are bringing these weird bonuses back, but just for this one ship.
Zeera Tomb-Raider Aliastra Gallente Federation 20	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:19:00 - [43] - Quote mkint wrote: Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think. covops cloak is one of the most powerful lowsec survival tools there is, especially on a frigate hull. Watch local, watch d-scan. No point of ship balance can cure stupid. yes but i still like the +2 in warp strength on venture better than the cloack,
Medalyn Isis Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic 175	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:21:00 - [44] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Rovinia wrote: This one doesn't have the "+2 warp core strength" Role bonus the Venture has, is that right? Not that i want to complain about it, the exchange for the Covert Ops Cloaking device is good enough. Just not sure if it's a mistake or intended. You are correct, the Prospect doesn't have extra warp core strength, as the covert cloak handles that function. Hope you guys enjoy these changes, I'm heading to the fight them pub crawl so I won't be answering questions tonight, but rest assured I will be back later to read everything. Cheers! Fozzie, awesome on the ship. I love it. But it is missing one very important thing. The ability to Ice Mine! Why can we not have a ship like this which can mine ice? That would be perfect.
Berluth Luthian Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 187	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:22:00 - [45] - Quote Blockade runners that can make short covert bridges would be cool.
Owen Levanth Federated Deep Space Explorations 132	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:26:00 - [46] - Quote Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: mkint wrote: Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think. covops cloak is one of the most powerful lowsec survival tools there is, especially on a frigate hull. Watch local, watch d-scan. No point of ship balance can cure stupid. yes but i still like the +2 in warp strength on venture better than the cloack, But why? A cloak cloaks you always without fail, except if you do something stupid. Every ******* with two faction scrams can overpower a fully warp-stabbed Venture. If you don't have additional stabs in your lows, a single 3-point faction scram can point you. Or the combination of a normal scram and a warp disruptor. Or if you get alpha'd before you can warp out. +2 warp strength is neat, but not better then a covert-ops cloak.
Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 3155	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:30:00 - [47] - Quote Why is Fullerides marked up as a link, but with no actual url? Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Tharin Malkyre Knights of the Ouroboros 22	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:32:00 - [48] - Quote Obligatory: Our Prospects will blot out the sun. So very looking forward to this ship. Everyone in my corp is going to be heckled until they train Mining Frigate V.
Benny Ohu Chaotic Tranquility 3139	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:32:00 - [49] - Quote Steve Ronuken wrote: Why is Fullerides marked up as a link, but with no actual url? dev blogs have been doing that recently :S are you a csm yet hurry up
Darin Vanar Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 1	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:33:00 - [50] - Quote That, is amazing. Thanks for making me excited for this upcoming expansion, the price changes from previous blogs really had me questioning my viability as a young pilot in New Eden. This will at least open new frontiers for work. :) Exciting stuff. One of my first questions on newbie channel was if I could equip a cloaking device on a Venture and everyone laughed. Well, this TII Venture is just great. :D Awesome stuff.
Loraine Gess Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists 257	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:36:00 - [51] - Quote Steve Ronuken wrote: Why is Fullerides marked up as a link, but with no actual url? Next up: Fulleride changes
Zeera Tomb-Raider Aliastra Gallente Federation 20	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:39:00 - [52] - Quote Owen Levanth wrote: Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: mkint wrote: Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think. covops cloak is one of the most powerful lowsec survival tools there is, especially on a frigate hull. Watch local, watch d-scan. No point of ship balance can cure stupid. yes but i still like the +2 in warp strength on venture better than the cloack, But why? A cloak cloaks you always without fail, except if you do something stupid. Every ******* with two faction scrams can overpower a fully warp-stabbed Venture. If you don't have additional stabs in your lows, a single 3-point faction scram can point you. Or the combination of a normal scram and a warp disruptor. Or if you get alpha'd before you can warp out. +2 warp strength is neat, but not better then a covert-ops cloak. tru you have a point ther.the cloack migth be better at keeping you a live,+2 warp strengt migth help you get back from your adventurs going tru gats,not that fun to be stranded in 0 sec or lowe if you want the ore back to hige sec.after all a miner will be exposed when mining so gankers only need to wait at gate,so just 1 ship can stop you from getting back
Vincent Athena V.I.C.E. 2749	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:39:00 - [53] - Quote mkint wrote: Isn't this better than the venture in every possible way? I thought that wasn't supposed to be the point of T2 ships. It looks like the only way the venture is any better is in price, which, also, you said you weren't going to do any more. edit: I guess this one doesn't have the built in warp core strength, but how frequently did that bonus ever actually come into play in the past? The Venture is cheaper. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/
Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 3155	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:40:00 - [54] - Quote Benny Ohu wrote: Steve Ronuken wrote: Why is Fullerides marked up as a link, but with no actual url? dev blogs have been doing that recently :S are you a csm yet hurry up 24 hours to go. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Seith Kali GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 17	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:51:00 - [55] - Quote Gonna take more than a bit of mexallon in the arkanor to make null mining a serious profession fozzie. Give us a mining dread or let the rorqual be it. Apprentice Goonswarm Economic Warfare Consultant - Drowning in entitlement and privilege.-á
Owen Levanth Federated Deep Space Explorations 132	Posted - 2014.05.02 20:53:00 - [56] - Quote Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: Owen Levanth wrote: Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: mkint wrote: Zeera Tomb-Raider wrote: I like this ship.but the prize on it have to be low,if not way dont just keep jusing venture if the risk vs reward gose up and not down,next i hope you make a bc version with combat abileties to figth of any solo ganker in a frig T1-T2.im not sure way the cloack shud be ther, can it jump gate cloacked if so grate,cant mine cloacked so if you made ship imune to al warp jammers ship moduls not inincluding capital mods that be of grater help than the cloack i think. covops cloak is one of the most powerful lowsec survival tools there is, especially on a frigate hull. Watch local, watch d-scan. No point of ship balance can cure stupid. yes but i still like the +2 in warp strength on venture better than the cloack, But why? A cloak cloaks you always without fail, except if you do something stupid. Every ******* with two faction scrams can overpower a fully warp-stabbed Venture. If you don't have additional stabs in your lows, a single 3-point faction scram can point you. Or the combination of a normal scram and a warp disruptor. Or if you get alpha'd before you can warp out. +2 warp strength is neat, but not better then a covert-ops cloak. tru you have a point ther.the cloack migth be better at keeping you a live,+2 warp strengt migth help you get back from your adventurs going tru gats,not that fun to be stranded in 0 sec or lowe if you want the ore back to hige sec.after all a miner will be exposed when mining so gankers only need to wait at gate,so just 1 ship can stop you from getting back Two things to help: MWD + cloak trick for the old fashioned way. Or the mobile depot + probe launcher combo for secretly scanning your way through W-Space. Remember, you can refit your cov-ops cloak right after scanning down your own exit and sneak through a few wormholes until you get spit out into LowSec or HighSec again. (With a cov-op cloak LowSec is ridiculously safe. Just look at d-scan once in a while to not warp to a gate with an entire fleet of smarbombing battleships waiting and you're golden.)
Zeera Tomb-Raider Aliastra Gallente Federation 20	Posted - 2014.05.02 21:03:00 - [57] - Quote Seith Kali wrote: Gonna take more than a bit of mexallon in the arkanor to make null mining a serious profession fozzie. Give us a mining dread or let the rorqual be it. Agre with you ther,The only thing that will help is to give mining ships som combat abilletis beside the drons so if they operate in a fleet they will need less protection from other combat pilots,after all not many pvp pilots will guard mining ships for houers a day,they dident sign up to this game for that.
Ugleb Jotunn Risi Ushra'Khan 391	Posted - 2014.05.02 21:03:00 - [58] - Quote The Prospect may not have the +2 warp strength of the Venture, but it does get +3 lows and covert ops cloaking. Sounds like an even more annoying stabbed FW LP farmer. That can warp around invisibly. And fit more WCS. And gets a 10m sig radius reduction. I don't like this thought. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ The Jotunn Risi are now recruiting, Brutor ancestry required in order to best represent the Brutor interest.-á Join channel JORIS to learn more!
GavinGoodrich Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels 69	Posted - 2014.05.02 21:03:00 - [59] - Quote mkint wrote: Isn't this better than the venture in every possible way? I thought that wasn't supposed to be the point of T2 ships. It looks like the only way the venture is any better is in price, which, also, you said you weren't going to do any more. edit: I guess this one doesn't have the built in warp core strength, but how frequently did that bonus ever actually come into play in the past? I think the difference in tiers you're talking about is tier 3 vs. tier 2, which is more balanced now. Tier 2 will just about always be superior in every way to tier 1, hence the pricetag. Haaaaaalp my head's on fire
Max Kolonko High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance 396	Posted - 2014.05.02 21:29:00 - [60] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Rovinia wrote: This one doesn't have the "+2 warp core strength" Role bonus the Venture has, is that right? Not that i want to complain about it, the exchange for the Covert Ops Cloaking device is good enough. Just not sure if it's a mistake or intended. You are correct, the Prospect doesn't have extra warp core strength, as the covert cloak handles that function. Hope you guys enjoy these changes, I'm heading to the fight them pub crawl so I won't be answering questions tonight, but rest assured I will be back later to read everything. Cheers! Fozzie - I know this is not the right subject but You announced something today that may very strongly affect wormholes: Freighters with cargo rigs will be able to bring packaged super-caps into wormholes! Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff?

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,06s, ref 20250920/1901
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.