Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

PotatoOverdose
Royal Black Watch Highlanders DARKNESS.
2411
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 04:33:38 -
[31] - Quote
Persifonne wrote:Point is slippery slope we been going down. Wardecs are next. Once people still stay in npc corps after this change ccp will see its cuz wardecs and supanerf em. Heard here 1st The slippery slope argument can be used for anything, making it rather worthless. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
8795
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 04:33:58 -
[32] - Quote
Doc J wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Personally I think awoxxing never made much sense. How does it really benefit the game? Ships blowing up always benifit the game. People produce ships, if ships didn't explode nothing any of us do in EVE would worth anything. Awoxxing (like all such interactions) teaches players to be aware, to be concerned about who they trust. This is good because being able to trust everyone simply because you're in high sec and in the same corp is boring. Their is this tendency among some to wish for peace and comfort only to find that those things get boring after a while. It's conflict and danger that is interesting. This is why people leave EVE for 'safer' games only to come back when they realise that games without risk and danger is about as fun as riding a roller coaster that doesn't exceed 5 miles per hour. This is why every epic, every good movie, every good book, every good game is about conflict. It's why real life news media types live by the rule of "if it bleeds it leads". These moves to make EVE safer are actually moves to make EVE a worse game. People have the right to play the game in the safe manner they wish or in the conflict/dangerous way. You shouldn't be wanting to impose your belief of "conflict makes the game interesting" on people who say for instance-pay to play the game the way they wish which might actually be in the comfort zone.
This is the worst possible thinking.
In EVE, it doesn't matter what you WANT to do, it matters what you are strong/clever/ruthless enough to either get away with or make someone else do.
I succeed in EVE as a pve player ebcause I've been smart enough (except for a few times) to outwit the 'bad guys'. I get to do what I want because I put some thoguht into my gameplay before undocking. My whole game is built around not letting other people decide for me what I will do. That's how the game has value, becuase of my efforts.
But others seem to want the powers that be to delvier to them the same success that I only experienced through effort. This is annoying, because if you want success without working for it, why play a sandbox game? Why play a harsh, cold game if you want comfort? Why are these 'comfort seekers' not playing a themepark MMO that is built on the philosophy of giving comfort?
Can we not have ONE game in the MMO genre that treats it's players like adults who can think for themselves rather than kids who need protecting? EVE was that one game when I started playing in 2007 (before all this safe BS), but it seems that with every passing year CCP is mroe determined to turn it ito the same mushy nothingness most MMOs are. |

Valkin Mordirc
381
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 04:36:37 -
[33] - Quote
If they take out corp aggression, how would a corp provide logi when they are at war? Or when they need to repair a pos? Or Test a fit out?
Sure you can duel, but a POS isnt going to aspect a duel request,
Regardless of that if AWOXing goes, I really don't like the idea of it going, I've awoxed once, and sure it was interesting, but it wasn't my thing, but I think it provides a nice bit of player made creation. It nice to have conflict with players in this game. It's apart of the meta.
#DeleteTheWeak
|

Persifonne
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 04:53:11 -
[34] - Quote
And didnt corp kick que tske care of this enough?? |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1750
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 05:04:34 -
[35] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Yay another buff to HiSec!!!!
And people said a single hisec rep[ would be useless and have no influence
bwa ha haaaaaa
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9
|

Valkin Mordirc
382
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 05:55:42 -
[36] - Quote
Also I know it was a sarcastic comment,
But this isnt a buff to highsec,
It's a nerf to the Villain "Meta", which in turn affects the Highsec PVE'ers. The CSM's and CCP should not be removing content, but balancing out, and add new content. For the most part, If I wanted to AWOX I should be able to, it been apart of the game for so long, I can't see why they are taking it away now. EVE doesn't (IMO) to have awoxing taken away.
If you want to make Highsec a better place, add something to it. Don't take it away from the people, just so the little lonely types that want to be secluded in there fantasy isk runs. Those people don't last long in EVE. EVE is about the connection with people you CAN trust. And when you make that connection with somebody, it important because they CAN **** you over, and when they don't it, it makes the game WAY better.
#DeleteTheWeak
|

Abraham Nalelmir
THE INQUISITI0N
42
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 06:39:15 -
[37] - Quote
I see it as EVE is under a big nerfing campaign, because it has been around since 10 years, all mechanics have been known and used/exploited, many vets have left the game after "finishing the game", nullsec is at a boring sucks stale status...
It is time to give people "new" EVE that is not like how it was before, and I think the intended audience are the people who are considered carebears/noobs/whatever bad names we have on those guys... because those guys are paying customers as well and they are majority in the game... and they need to get in deeper in the game and it's mechanics...
Of course the older players won't just let those new guys do it because "they need to play as the elders want"... so I think that's a normal act from CCP to do it, even if they did not mean it...
It is like, ok old generation, your time is up, thanks a lot for being part of this game's history, and for all your awesome work you've done, but it is time you let the new younger generation take the initiative in a new looking game with new mechanics and rules.
That's what I saw happened in wormholes, and what will happen in nullsec soon and what might happen in highsec as well.
So either the elders adapt to live under the new rule of the young, or they just get an honorable goodbye party and finally retire.
Again it is how I read this.
In Go.. ECM I trust
|

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
1584
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 06:44:15 -
[38] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Doc J wrote:People have the right to play the game in the safe manner they wish or in the conflict/dangerous way. You shouldn't be wanting to impose your belief of "conflict makes the game interesting" on people who say for instance-pay to play the game the way they wish which might actually be in the comfort zone. This is the worst possible thinking. In EVE, it doesn't matter what you WANT to do I'd actually replace 'EVE' with 'any game'. In 'any game', if you start playing and find the rules aren't to your liking, then you can **** right back off on whatever comfort zone you rode in on.
Witty Image - Stream
Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment
|

Arronicus
Bitter Lemons Brothers of Tangra
1206
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 06:47:58 -
[39] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Xuixien wrote:Yay another buff to HiSec!!!! And people said a single hisec rep[ would be useless and have no influence bwa ha haaaaaa m
Where is DJ from? The guy who was throwing all he had at stopping the change. Out of curiousity |

lord xavier
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
53
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 07:34:26 -
[40] - Quote
Doc J wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Personally I think awoxxing never made much sense. How does it really benefit the game? Ships blowing up always benifit the game. People produce ships, if ships didn't explode nothing any of us do in EVE would worth anything. Awoxxing (like all such interactions) teaches players to be aware, to be concerned about who they trust. This is good because being able to trust everyone simply because you're in high sec and in the same corp is boring. Their is this tendency among some to wish for peace and comfort only to find that those things get boring after a while. It's conflict and danger that is interesting. This is why people leave EVE for 'safer' games only to come back when they realise that games without risk and danger is about as fun as riding a roller coaster that doesn't exceed 5 miles per hour. This is why every epic, every good movie, every good book, every good game is about conflict. It's why real life news media types live by the rule of "if it bleeds it leads". These moves to make EVE safer are actually moves to make EVE a worse game. People have the right to play the game in the safe manner they wish or in the conflict/dangerous way. You shouldn't be wanting to impose your belief of "conflict makes the game interesting" on people who say for instance-pay to play the game the way they wish which might actually be in the comfort zone. This game makes it way to easy to play it safely. The problem isn't the safety not being there. The problem is that players want it to be really easy, as in they don't have to be aware of what is going on. Like the charons and orca's that sit going 0 m/s on a belt in a 0.5/0.6 system with a lowsec gate. Then dont have an evac plan for when you get the 20+ criminal notifications in the middle of your screen.
That is just idiocy. That has nothing to do with the fact it is really safe to actually live in high sec. You just have to not be ******** and know how to actually keep yourself safe. Nothing in eve is handed to us. Some areas are just less safe and require you to pay more attention than others. It is absolutely absurd if you think that there should be a completely, 100% safe zone in this type of a game that allows complete player control. Player controlled markets, player controlled minerals, player controlled content. Now we are starting to cater to the needs of the people who want to play a Single-Player-Online-Role-Playing-Game? What? Are you attempting to **** on me right now? If you want a completely safe game where another player cannot come ruin your game I suggest finding a game that is not an MMO and meant to be played with others for overall content. |
|

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1631
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 07:35:23 -
[41] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ships blowing up always benifit the game. People produce ships, if ships didn't explode nothing any of us do in EVE would worth anything.
Awoxxing (like all such interactions) teaches players to be aware, to be concerned about who they trust. This is good because being able to trust everyone simply because you're in high sec and in the same corp is boring. Their is this tendency among some to wish for peace and comfort only to find that those things get boring after a while. It's conflict and danger that is interesting. This is why people leave EVE for 'safer' games only to come back when they realise that games without risk and danger is about as fun as riding a roller coaster that doesn't exceed 5 miles per hour.
This is why every epic, every good movie, every good book, every good game is about conflict. It's why real life news media types live by the rule of "if it bleeds it leads". These moves to make EVE safer are actually moves to make EVE a worse game.
So obviously suicide ganking is a much better alternative than ganking then because even more ships blow up! You bring forward a terrible mechanic. As Falcon (or was it Fozzie) said, if ships blowing up was good, then a 10% chance of blowing up every time you jump a gate would be a good mechanic. It's not just about ships blowing up, it's about HOW ships blow up.
Learn to be inventive with your spying and awoxing. Learn to do it by sucking them into low sec, into duels for 'fit testing'. Adapt. Don't just sit there and cry because CCP are removing an easy mode for you. And awoxing is Easy Mode. No API check will catch a grown from scratch Alt.
Removing a terrible inconsistency from the rules of PvP is a good thing, as it allows CCP to increase the difficulty in evading war decs in return, as well as other ways to encourage meaningful PvP where both sides have fun. |

lord xavier
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
53
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 07:36:42 -
[42] - Quote
Oh, and lul no this wont stop AWOXing. It also wont stop people joining to completely rob the corps. Though not sure why anyone would try to rob a highsec dweller corp. They are all poor as hell anyways. |

Cecil Montague
PCG Enterprises
49
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 07:45:00 -
[43] - Quote
It's kinda hard to run background checks to avoid Awoxing when you're part of a corp dedicated to accepting and training new players in order to help them stick with the game.
"There is no such thing as an effective segment of Totality" - Bruce Lee: The only man with a Chuck Norris killmail.
|

Doc J
Assisted Homicide
10
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 08:49:25 -
[44] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:
The appeal of EVE to many of us was that there was supposed to be no comfort zone. Anyone that's looking for a comfort zone is playing the wrong game.
I get that apart from the bit about playing the wrong game. Who are you to tell someone they are playing the wrong game? You can tell me how I can play when you pay for my subscription.
Quote:Looking for comfort zones in EVE is like getting in a plane but never taking off. Unfortunately, it seems that won't be the case for much longer. It looks like a day is coming where EVE will only be EVE by name, but the game it is/was will no longer exist.
Not true by a long stretch of the imagination. I think you are being pretty ignorant to the great work CCP have done to ensure game play remains open.
Quote:EVE was originally created by people who didn't like the PVP restrictions in Ultima Online. Now they're going in a completely opposite direction, and handing it over to the same kinds of people who ruined Ultima.
Not really, they're just opening the idea of allowing people and corporations to protect themselves. Awoxing isn't PVP, just like suicide ganking, it's about tears.
|

Valkin Mordirc
383
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 09:02:10 -
[45] - Quote
Quote:I get that apart from the bit about playing the wrong game. Who are you to tell someone they are playing the wrong game? You can tell me how I can play when you pay for my subscription.
Because you whine about parts of the game, that most people understand and feel perfectly okay with. No one likes a whiner.
Quote: Not true by a long stretch of the imagination. I think you are being pretty ignorant to the great work CCP have done to ensure game play remains open.
No he's not. EVE is a game of villenary and conflict. IF they take away Awoxing, they remove a intergial part of the game, a part that encourages caution, and helps develop real trust in a video game. Many people in my corp could F*** me over, but they don't, and that makes a bond that KEEPS people in the game, far longer than a solo mission runner afraid that he might lose his Billion isk Navy Raven.
CCP even has a song, HTFU, What does that tell you about how they feel about the subject?
EVE is MEANT to be a game where you can be the bad guy. It encourages it. Taking this away is an active attempt to change that. If the Trend keeps going, theres no point for EVE to call itself a 'dark' mmo.
Quote: Not really, they're just opening the idea of allowing people and corporations to protect themselves. Awoxing isn't PVP, just like suicide ganking, it's about tears.
No. Tears are a by-product. Awoxing some corp, is about an expensive killmail, good loot, and maybe a ransom and hence a good payday. Some, not many, but some, people make Isk BY Awoxing.
Awoxing is totally Pvp as well, Its more PVP then just a random lowsec fight. It's a mindgame, you pitting yourself against a larger force than you, with what is probably a less than 5-mil alt. And totally wrecking.
Suicide ganking is also, the same. Tears are a by-product. You can make a fortune burning a freighter and getting a good drop.
So Sorry. But this is suppose to be a game with assholes, and people who **** you off.
If you don't like that, than HTFU,
#DeleteTheWeak
|

Persifonne
The Scope Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 09:09:59 -
[46] - Quote
lord xavier wrote:Oh, and lul no this wont stop AWOXing. It also wont stop people joining to completely rob the corps. Though not sure why anyone would try to rob a highsec dweller corp. They are all poor as hell anyways. 
It will now take long time to get director roles to loot cuz thats only way to awox now.
Almost 1 Billion isk for a Plex
Gonna need to STEAL BILLIONS ANS BILLIONS ANS more BILLIONS to make awox even worthwile and pay more than just mining dor that time period.
Think bout it |

Doc J
Assisted Homicide
10
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 10:04:21 -
[47] - Quote
Valkin Mordirc wrote:Quote:I get that apart from the bit about playing the wrong game. Who are you to tell someone they are playing the wrong game? You can tell me how I can play when you pay for my subscription. Because you whine about parts of the game, that most people understand and feel perfectly okay with. No one likes a whiner. Quote: Not true by a long stretch of the imagination. I think you are being pretty ignorant to the great work CCP have done to ensure game play remains open. No he's not. EVE is a game of villenary and conflict. IF they take away Awoxing, they remove a intergial part of the game, a part that encourages caution, and helps develop real trust in a video game. Many people in my corp could F*** me over, but they don't, and that makes a bond that KEEPS people in the game, far longer than a solo mission runner afraid that he might lose his Billion isk Navy Raven. CCP even has a song, HTFU, What does that tell you about how they feel about the subject? EVE is MEANT to be a game where you can be the bad guy. It encourages it. Taking this away is an active attempt to change that. If the Trend keeps going, theres no point for EVE to call itself a 'dark' mmo. Quote: Not really, they're just opening the idea of allowing people and corporations to protect themselves. Awoxing isn't PVP, just like suicide ganking, it's about tears. No. Tears are a by-product. Awoxing some corp, is about an expensive killmail, good loot, and maybe a ransom and hence a good payday. Some, not many, but some, people make Isk BY Awoxing. Awoxing is totally Pvp as well, Its more PVP then just a random lowsec fight. It's a mindgame, you pitting yourself against a larger force than you, with what is probably a less than 5-mil alt. And totally wrecking. Suicide ganking is also, the same. Tears are a by-product. You can make a fortune burning a freighter and getting a good drop. So Sorry. But this is suppose to be a game with assholes, and people who **** you off. If you don't like that, than HTFU,
Good reply, Let me point out that just because someone doesn't have the same point of view as you they aren't whinging or has to HTFU.
Eve is and always will be a "dark" MMO. The thing you are missing is consequence. The fundamentals of the game haven't changed but the consequences have. As the game has evolved so too have players but the the diminishing penalty of being the bad guy haven't, Its all about balance and as much as people say Eve is easy, the ease at which someone can be that bad guy through awox or suicide gank is totally unbalanced towards the bad guy. |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
700
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 10:06:06 -
[48] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote: And now the awoxxers have to lose a catalyst to concord once in a while. The sky is surely falling!
Someone else gets it. One person screams that CCP is hold hands, another is pointing out that person's fallacies. Let's break it down.
1. High sec. No one is safe. 2. No PVP flag exists. CONCORD is a brake mechanism to prevent total chaos. War dec bypass that. 3. AWOX hide in high sec with the same protection as everyone else, but the is nothing in the entire game that says they get free kills via corporates they have infiltrated. Nothing...it's risk free PvP since CONCORD won't respond back. 4. ???? 5. Profit! Loopholes are closed, null and low have no restriction, high sec has CONCORD and gank prevention via consequences, nobody gets to spout who has the correct play style. There is still no PVP flag for immunity, just humility now that you lose ships just as the gank target.
AWOX at best destroy the game because trust is more valuable than a plex, AWOX creates more paranoia than trust and they sure as hell do not lose that many ships compared to what they destroy...everybody is equal in that regard, |

Bastion Arzi
Mortis Angelus The Kadeshi
192
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 10:49:42 -
[49] - Quote
i support a concord response to awoxing. |

Persifonne
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 10:52:03 -
[50] - Quote
CCP STILL OBLIVIOUS TO FACT NEUTRAL LOGI R/R IS BIGGEST "GRIEF" FACTOR IN AWOX
They got corp kick que. Just fix neut logi but giving corpmates a stupid engaugment timer. Then rr suspect fixed. While keeping corp violnce. Evrrybody wins yo |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
21296
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:06:37 -
[51] - Quote
Doc J wrote:People have the right to play the game in the safe manner they wish or in the conflict/dangerous way. You're correct, but it should be up to those who wish to play the game in the "safe manner" to protect themselves from those that wish to play in the "conflict/dangerous manner". Jenn plays the game in the "safe manner", as do I; both of us take precautions to ensure that we don't become victims of those who play in the "conflict/dangerous manner".
Not getting ganked because you took measures to prevent it is as much PvP as ganking those who fail to take those measures.
Quote:You can tell me how I can play when you pay for my subscription. That swings both ways my friend.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:16:24 -
[52] - Quote
Persifonne wrote:CCP STILL OBLIVIOUS TO FACT NEUTRAL LOGI R/R IS BIGGEST "GRIEF" FACTOR IN AWOX
They got corp kick que. Just fix neut logi but giving corpmates a stupid engaugment timer. Then rr suspect fixed. While keeping corp violnce. Evrrybody wins yo
Since Neutral Logi will be repaired: Also we will get bumping repaired!
Nice!
Forum Main
|

eliminator2
The Trolls from Tunttaras Bad-Intentions
17
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:18:54 -
[53] - Quote
in my eyes this kills most of eve
i dont awox myself but to me it seems idiotic safe gaurding the missioners/miners in high-sec
what next only pvp in low-sec on belts/planets?
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:21:26 -
[54] - Quote
Many tactics where cool and fun in the early years of EvE. Awoxing, spying, ganking... For more growth all things have to be reconsidered.
Forum Main
|

Jean Luc Lemmont
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
145
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:21:44 -
[55] - Quote
This has the potential to be an even larger fiasco than Incarna.
A bitter vet trying to start anew.
|

John Ratcliffe
Sarumans Hand
278
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:27:29 -
[56] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:Persifonne wrote:When will hisec become pvp free (except for duels and wardecs). Anyone activating weapons on player ship that you arent wardecced to, isnt flashy red or in a duel with will get concorded. Only pvp in lowsec null and wh. This day is coming. It is closer than we think. I'm ready to unsub my accounts basically any time at this point. No point in staying subbed... once EVE goes themepark it'll go the way of all the other themepark MMOs. In it's place some other small, niche, dark game will pop up to satisfy people who actually enjoy hard games without having their hands held.
There's a difference between facilitating enjoyable gameplay and allowing griefing pricks to be griefing pricks.
P.S. Can I haz your stuffs?
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
|

Doc J
Assisted Homicide
10
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:27:54 -
[57] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Doc J wrote:People have the right to play the game in the safe manner they wish or in the conflict/dangerous way. You're correct, but it should be up to those who wish to play the game in the "safe manner" to protect themselves from those that wish to play in the "conflict/dangerous manner". Jenn plays the game in the "safe manner", as do I; both of us take precautions to ensure that we don't become victims of those who play in the "conflict/dangerous manner". Not getting ganked because you took measures to prevent it is as much PvP as ganking those who fail to take those measures. Quote:You can tell me how I can play when you pay for my subscription. That swings both ways my friend.
As I do, I play the game with a small group of people but on my own most of the time. That's how i safe gaurd myself from awoxers, This is completely against what Eve wants but I don't want my game being ruined by an *******.
Curious, how do you safe guard yourself from lets says the idiotic ganking that is going on at the moment. The JF's, Freighters? There isn't anything. Now that the majority of the player base has ISK this is why I mention in a previous post, the consequence of engaging in a dark act has changed because it hasn't. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
21296
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 11:44:16 -
[58] - Quote
Doc J wrote:Curious, how do you safe guard yourself from lets says the idiotic ganking that is going on at the moment. I don't fly freighters and JF's I use tanked T1 haulers and keep my cargo value below 3000isk/hp. If I have a valuable load to move I outsource the risk to Red Frog or PushX. I've got most of the known ganking groups set to show up in the overview as "evil bastages" via the standings mechanic, as well as being in some of their public chat channels for intel purposes. Most importantly I never use autopilot or go afk unless I'm cloaked or docked.
TL;DR I make somebody else an easier/ more desirable target.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|

Remiel Pollard
Layman's Terms. Don't Tell Me The Odds
5804
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 12:02:39 -
[59] - Quote
A lot of people seem to be forgetting here that awoxing works both ways - if you can awox a corp, they can fight back just as easily, if not more easily than if you were just ganking them or dueling one guy. As it is right now, a whole corp can gang up on you to take you down. Limit it to ganking/dueling and one guy at best is going to have that chance to beat you, at worst, no one at all. I can tell you now that if someone were to awox us, our first instinct wouldn't be to kick them, it would be to blow them up in the shiniest **** they have as much as possible and force them into quitting, and then continue blowing them up anyway. This move is pandering to the carebears, and as far as making things more welcoming to newbros, there's only so much cotton wool you can wrap them up in before they begin to expect it all the time.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|

Doc J
Assisted Homicide
10
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 12:25:13 -
[60] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Doc J wrote:Curious, how do you safe guard yourself from lets says the idiotic ganking that is going on at the moment. I don't fly freighters and JF's I use tanked T1 haulers and keep my cargo value below 3000isk/hp. If I have a valuable load to move I outsource the risk to Red Frog or PushX. I've got most of the known ganking groups set to show up in the overview as "evil bastages" via the standings mechanic, as well as being in some of their public chat channels for intel purposes. Most importantly I never use autopilot or go afk unless I'm cloaked or docked. TL;DR I make somebody else an easier/ more desirable target.
But that still doesn't solve ganking.
I think awoxing and ganking are two things which need to be looked at, like I keep talking about, the consequence of either act is now so minimal that it's a bit like the travel nerf "forcing people to consider their actions more closely". |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |