Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 169 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |

Kuga
Bert and Ernie's Jihadi Militants Drop the Hammer
15
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:48:21 -
[481] - Quote
Thanks for taking action on this, CCP. The issue of software using multi box bombers has been becoming a significant issue in null sec space of late. I hope this will also benefit non-keystroke replicating software using miners to become competitive again.
There will no doubt be many tears from those who would seek to abuse the multi boxing facility with the use of replicative keystroke software, but this change can only be good in the long term.
|

Zedutchman
The Miners of Hyperion
6
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:48:57 -
[482] - Quote
Thank god..... Time to start buying Ice..... |

Apo Lamperouge
23
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:49:08 -
[483] - Quote
Soren Oboro wrote: DEAD EVE !!!!!
All the players in eve have more then two, or 10 accounts do you really think what all of us will go out and buy an computer that had 10 or 20 ******* monitors REALLY!!! **** NO!!!! I will Not
unsubbed will play until the First!!!! GOOD BYE CCP AND ITS DUMM ASS POLITICS
I will buy your accounts for 1 isk.
Not like you need the isk anyway. Bye bye lardass
Sometimes a knife right through your heart is exactly what you need.
|

Airi Cho
Dark-Rising Executive Outcomes
28
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:49:27 -
[484] - Quote
Rawthorm wrote:While I've never used software like ISBoxer, I can imagine that it's use probably increased quality of life for most non-ISBox using eve players.
BomberBox fleets were quite rare and despite the number of butt hurt people who've clearly not been paying attention and got caught by one, I don't think they began to come close to outweighing the benefits such as making Ice easy to harvest leaving the rest of us time to actually play the more fun aspects of EvE rather than spend half our lives slowly grinding icecubes. Almost every player in EvE has benefited from cheaper fuel and cheaper ships because of those using ISBoxer, so is an overriding ban worth it just to get rid of a few trolling bombers on your space?
I think it's seriously time for CCP to look into quality of life improvements for running infrastructure and give us bigger and better gear to use (and put at risk) to cut down the time spent doing all the boring monotonous stuff.
bomber fleets got a bit less common because their most common pray (battleships) got less common. |

indig0F10w
Weed smokers HQ The Amish Mafia
7
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:50:21 -
[485] - Quote
Good work CCP, no more one man armies. Botter tears are soaking this topic deep ;) |

Apo Lamperouge
23
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:50:25 -
[486] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:The rage, the smug, the self important CSM posts, it's all to much to take in.
OOOH OOH point me to the self important CSM posts!!!
Sometimes a knife right through your heart is exactly what you need.
|

Airi Cho
Dark-Rising Executive Outcomes
28
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:50:39 -
[487] - Quote
PL really has a thing for Taylor Swift it seems :p
|

COMM4NDER
Legendary Umbrellas
151
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:50:56 -
[488] - Quote
Man this is awesome!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbIR51_J_qY
[url=https://github.com/CommanderAlchemy/.bin/blob/master/eve] EVE - Online Launcher [Linux] [/url]
Installs, launches character prefixes (both SISI & Tranquility).
Simplescreenrecorder shm inject
|

Rear Admiral Charlie
DR. SloMo and the G.I. Clinic
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:51:07 -
[489] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Rear Admiral Charlie wrote:To everybody complaining about isboxer I hope your ready to strap a miner to your ass because mineral prices are going to spike. And the people who are actually MANUALLY mining as used to be the norm will be gratefull for it .
i dont want to see "people" mining i want to see you mining |

Dustpuppy
Rox Inc
22
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:51:18 -
[490] - Quote
Radkiel wrote:Gina Taroen wrote:lol wonder how many people will quit because of this :D I just unsubbed all of my accounts, I'll play until the 1st then find another game.  I fail to see how multiboxing affects anyone around me.
Well let say it in a nice way: I don't believe you when you say "I fail to see..."
Here is s nice video of an isboxer demonstrating ratting with 14 clients at the same time on a single computer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlm4XrR0VvU
And look at the comments:
1) "once your rolling its about 80-100m per account per hourn++" -> 1.4 billion/hour 2) " I've been mining using IS Boxer for over a year [...]I do about 6b ISK a day mining in Null."
I don't believe you when you say "I pay for my accounts", I'd rather say you (just like the two quoted from YT) use isboxer to generate a lot of income which is used for buying plexes and what I also suspect to use the additional income for rmt.
I won't miss these kind of players for a single second. |

Astroyka
Mirkur Draug'Tyr
151
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:51:50 -
[491] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:An account subscribed with PLEX is equals to an account subscribed by a subscription package. There is no distinction between them and both options give money to CCP.
Your original point doesn't stand.
Both options do give cash to CCP at some point, but I doubt the majority of isboxers are actually paying hard cash for PLEX and instead are buying them from the open market. Sure the loss of so many accounts will hit the PLEX market, but people will still buy GTC (etc.) to convert to PLEX as its the easiest way to get large amounts of ingame currency.
CCP are clearly happy to take the hit, which I still think will be small, for the benefit of the game.
Astroyka - A Mirkur Draug'Tyr pilot, fighting against slavery in New Eden
www.astroyka.net
GÖÑ proud EvE fansites member GÖÑ
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5533
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:55:16 -
[492] - Quote
Hopelesshobo wrote:So, because broadcasting is being banned as of 01 Jan 2015, does that mean on 01 Jan 2015, cloaks will be reverted again to not decloaking each other while cloaked since the main reason this was changed back was to nerf broadcasting bombers together?
Keep up with the times... they already changed their minds on that one before even implementing it. Nothing to revert.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|

Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
8667
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:55:42 -
[493] - Quote
I like CCP Falcon.
Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap.
Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!!
|

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
17933
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:56:51 -
[494] - Quote
FINALLY.
Falcon added to 'Is owed a beer' list.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
|

Sir SmashAlot
The League of Extraordinary Opportunists Intergalactic Conservation Movement
143
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:58:05 -
[495] - Quote
The price of plex is going to CRASH!!!
Cash out or you will regret it. |

El Space Mariachi
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
178
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:58:53 -
[496] - Quote
Sir SmashAlot wrote:The price of plex is going to CRASH!!!
Cash out or you will regret it.
already far too late for that my friend ))) wise monocle baron cashed out at 1b per unit xaxaxaxaxa
gay gamers for jesus
|

Dmitry Kuvora
WAR TEAM Flex Point
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 18:59:56 -
[497] - Quote
-â-Ç-¦ -é-+-¦-¦-Ç-+-ë-+ ! i glad to hear this news |

Pen Ris
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:00:27 -
[498] - Quote
Kenneth Feld wrote:
Just thinking outloud, I could make a script to cycle the windows and do the commands a window at a time, them I am not broadcasting to multiple clients - this may work after all
It appears Falcon predicted that kind of work-a-round and reiterated input automation is strictly prohibited. Pushing one key and having it run a single or set of commands on individual clients, in an automated order is input automation.
Input Automation remains strictly prohibited, and is policed under our suspension and ban policy. |

Hendrick Tallardar
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
293
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:00:44 -
[499] - Quote
XXXMina wrote:this is not right, you cant change the rules after 10 years, i got 5 accounts because it made sense with how the game is. now i cant use what little automation i take advantage of (just pressing the f keys ) . also jump fatigue and jump range change suxx: this is a space sim, way to clip our wings.
PS: im unsubbing all my accounts . you have till my 3 month sub runs out to fix this game.
They can, and they did.
If they couldn't change the rules after 10 years, why did they change the jump drive range on supers? Or the clone costs? or a plethora of other things a video game company does to keep their game fresh?
It's called "changing with the times" my friend.
EVE 101 Tutorial Series | Monthly Nullsec Recap | EVE Online Weekly
|

Jean Luc Lemmont
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
326
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:02:20 -
[500] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Big +1 on the decision, but I'm worried it doesn't go far enough. People will just purchase more screens, and manually control multiple accounts. It'll be harder, surely, but it's still viable to manually control a 10 ship tornado gank fleet or procurer mining fleet. The only sure way to get rid of multiboxing, and entitle everyone equally to the actions of one character at a time, is to get rid of multiboxing entirely.
You misunderstand their intentions.
A bitter vet trying to start anew.
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
5708
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:03:28 -
[501] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Michelle Monteleone wrote:Guess my 12 accounts are done as of January 1, 2015. I had fun while it lasted. First Warcraft removed /follow from pvp because of all the cry babies now CCP has removed multiboxing all together. The Eve universe is going to change quite a bit when all the resources people were pumping out with multiple accounts goes away. Merry Christmas CCP. Thanks for the lump of coal. See you cry babies in the next mmo I multibox in.  Good. As a vet of 7 years, get out. People like you, and other ~new~ scrubs who came in a few years ago after other vets left Eve made this game change, for the worse. With the changes being made now, the new rules, the new content, I am seeing old friends come back to Eve with a bit of hope that it won't be ****. If getting 1 or 2 honest to goodness pirate vets back, the ones who made pirating classy, means losing 100 ISBoxing scublords, I say good riddance. Now GET THE **** OUT
you need to post that with a female avatar so I won't feel so gay when I kiss it.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Jean Luc Lemmont
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
326
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:03:54 -
[502] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:
No, KVM switch is just that - a switch. It connects you to one computer at a time, not multiple.
You're right. My bad - I misunderstood the intention.
A bitter vet trying to start anew.
|

white male privilege
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
97
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:04:28 -
[503] - Quote
If you've ever wanted a nightmare alt to keep in his ex for incursion, there's gonna be a lot hitting the market. Put them on the same account as your main and join an incursion group, the only fun over activity in eve. Now CCP just needs to add variety to missions. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
5536
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:05:29 -
[504] - Quote
Airi Cho wrote:PL really has a thing for Taylor Swift it seems :p
It was a play off his Miley Cyrus example - did you miss that? I don't particularly care for either one.
And my corp name is a play off of PL, I don't particularly have any affiliation with them.
So you might be right, and you might be wrong, but my post doesn't connect the dots.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
|

white male privilege
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
98
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:06:18 -
[505] - Quote
Also like this post if you're gonna buy the devs a beer at fanfest this year has been amazing. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp Vae. Victis.
6025
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:06:40 -
[506] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Hopelesshobo wrote:So, because broadcasting is being banned as of 01 Jan 2015, does that mean on 01 Jan 2015, cloaks will be reverted again to not decloaking each other while cloaked since the main reason this was changed back was to nerf broadcasting bombers together? Keep up with the times... they already changed their minds on that one before even implementing it. Nothing to revert. Hey! Thanks for that, I missed it.
So the decloak other cloaked ships thing is not going to be implemented eh? Excellent.
I much prefer this solution.
View the latest EVE Online developments and War Thunder game play by visiting Ranger 1 Presents.
|

Dirritat'z Demblin
Unknown Dimension Alpha Volley Union
4
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:07:30 -
[507] - Quote
Good Job CCP! :D About time to kick those Single-Players that want the power of a community without actually interacting with said community from our MMO  |

Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
393
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:07:32 -
[508] - Quote
My reaction to this.
And I'm aware a dozen people will have posted it before me. |

Terini
Widgit Inc
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:07:37 -
[509] - Quote
Naburi NasNaburi wrote:Gina Taroen wrote:lol wonder how many people will quit because of this :D And I wonder how many of the old people will return :)
I came back to the game 2 weeks ago from 2 years off, due to CCP's come back offer.. and yes I thought nothing had changed but on hearing this I am definlaty buying a new plex for my 2 miners, I dual client but I have never used any form of automation nor have I ever thought of it, I feel that this is a good decision by CCP!
Terini Widgit Inc. Empire Mining since urmmm damn that long ago!!
|

Thomas Hurt
Future Methods
341
|
Posted - 2014.11.25 19:07:50 -
[510] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Imagine if you will a setting whereby there is not enforcement or a lack of regulation about the age of consent to have sex.
Believe it or not, it was like that back in the 1980s. It was quite common for say a 16 yo to date a 14 yo, or an 18 with 15 year old. Nobody really cared as long as the two were teenagers and the "maturity level of the individual" was taken into account.
You know, that whole "she won't date me I'm just a Freshman" clich+¬ from all those dumb films in the 80s.
Now imagine if, lacking regs or enforcement, you have men in their 20s and up dating 12 year old girls. It becomes a bit too much, a bit "in your face" and most of all, a little difficult to pretend it's still OK.
So, there was no problem with the multi box thing, all "within the rules" and an area where while it appeared illegal it was not.....
and then, like the 30 year old dating the 12 year old, suddenly you have entire fleets gratuitously hoovering up entire belts, each pilot not even having a real name, all in the safety of highsec.
If there is one mistake that CCP tends to make, it's the underestimation of the Min-Max player. If there is one little tiny atom-sized little teensy iota of a chance that something will be taken all the way in one direction as the mechanics allow it, then it WILL. If there is a "possibility" of something, anything, and that possibility leads to more ISK or more stats, then that possibility by itself becomes the reality. Thera for example, if the stations can be death bubbled by dictors, it WILL and by people who have all the time in the world for it.
So, while the multibox fleet may be OK per the rules and all that, we have seen the min max sperglords take that all the way to the absurd.
And absurd, even if in the rules, eventually starts to look bad. People get to wondering "what kind of people am I dealing with here?" and nobody is really having a good time when hit with crazy vibes.
Quoting this in case you edit it
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 169 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |