EVE Search - Tier 3 Battleships discussion

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Revelations Testing and Development

Tier 3 Battleships discussion

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Nifel Caldari Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.27 06:37:00 - [121] Originally by: Illuminaty Edited by: Illuminaty on 27/10/2006 06:15:55 Originally by: Nifel Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/10/2006 11:05:29 About the Maelstrom (very brief) The problems as a artillery platform * 8 projectile turrets with no dmg bonus means its not better at alpha strikes than the apoc or any other 8-turret battleship. Needs a damage bonus to get a valuable role in fleets. Err... it is? The tempest for example has more alphastrike than the apoc with 8x tachyons. A maxed out tempest pilot will have the equalivent of 7.5 turrets. The Maelstorm will have 8 turrets. 8 > 7.5 = QED. This just caught my attention: 8/7.5 = 1.0667 Is 6.7% enough diffrence to even justify making a new ship? The Hyperion/Malestorm/Abbadon just seem so 'wtf, why would I pay more for a ship that really does the same damn thing as another ship that I already have'. Edit:(I mean for ffs, combine lag with the need to activate more turrets and your probably doing less damage) If you want the absolutely best alphastrike then yes, it's worth it. It is, as many has noted, not cost-effective, but if you want the absolutely best alphastrike (at a reasonable price) you won't really worry about that. Lots of BoB pilots will fly it simply because it has the ROF bonus and 8 turrets. If the shield tanking bonus stays we'll use it for ew/tc/sb just like we do with the tempest. The real question about the Maelstorm is the tank bonus. It's more suited for a small/med gatecamp/fight and ac-setups than fleetfights which it's been touted as. Given that I'm in favour of changing it and the best suggestion I've seen so far was 10% shield hp per lvl. Such a bonus would give less resists than the Rohk, but you can with the current stats of the ship make a reasonable fleet setup with decent resists and a recharge rate that equals a large sbII. Equal to the Rohk in shieldtanking, but sufficently different enough to not encroach on Caldari's field. It also allows for more flexibility than the current bonus as you can choose to just give it some better resists and then go for damage increasing mods, go for an uber passive tank, something in between, and even in some situations go with an armor tank and utilize those medslots for ew/other useful medslot mods. A resistance bonus would give it about the same versitality but along different paths. "When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car." RKK Ranking: (MIN14)
Ni Nee	Posted - 2006.10.27 07:01:00 - [122] The bottom line on the Maelstrum is Minmatar pilots do not like shield boost bonus. Why not give that bonus to the Caldari BS and give us the range bonus and everyone will be happy!
Illuminaty ISS Logistics Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.10.27 07:23:00 - [123] FFS, just fit an faction gyrostab instead of a gyrostab II then. 6.7% is a diffrence that is only going to be noticable in a theoretical discussion about something or an e-peen measuring contest. It isn't sufficent grounds to base an entire battleship around. I'd be happy if they took the Hyperion, Maelstorm, and Abaddon back to the drawing board and came back with something that _adds_ to the ship lineup like the Rokh adds to the caldari lineup.
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.27 07:47:00 - [124] Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 07:47:35 This thread is turning out exacly like I thought it would. Total chaos...Which is better: 50000 threads or 50000 posts in one thread.... :p --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.27 07:53:00 - [125] Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 07:55:13 Originally by: Nifel Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/10/2006 11:05:29 About the Maelstrom (very brief) The problems as a artillery platform * 8 projectile turrets with no dmg bonus means its not better at alpha strikes than the apoc or any other 8-turret battleship. Needs a damage bonus to get a valuable role in fleets. Err... it is? The tempest for example has more alphastrike than the apoc with 8x tachyons. A maxed out tempest pilot will have the equalivent of 7.5 turrets. The Maelstorm will have 8 turrets. 8 > 7.5 = QED. I meant the apoc with projectiles here. Of course tachs dont have the alpha of projectiles. So Tempest doesnt have more alphastrike than the projectile apoc. Like you say here, it has 7.5 effective turrets of alpha strike. Apoc has 8. Maelstrom will have higher alpha than the Tempest, yes. By 0.5 turrets. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.27 07:58:00 - [126] Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 07:58:09 Originally by: Tiuwaz Tempest: "...a versatile gunship..." Typhoon: "...Its distinguishing aspect - and the source of most of the controversy - is its sheer versatility... Maelstrom: "With the Maelstrom, versatility is the name of the game..." with so much versatility you cant help but get a warm and fuzzy heart, despite that could we get for a change a minmatar BS with a defined role? Most versatile ships in the game is probably Raven and Dominix tbh.... but who am I to disagree with the devs. The Maelstrom looks versatile though. Its all in the slot layouts, not the race. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Nifel Caldari Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.27 08:14:00 - [127] Edited by: Nifel on 27/10/2006 08:13:50 Originally by: Illuminaty FFS, just fit an faction gyrostab instead of a gyrostab II then. 6.7% is a diffrence that is only going to be noticable in a theoretical discussion about something or an e-peen measuring contest. It isn't sufficent grounds to base an entire battleship around. I'd be happy if they took the Hyperion, Maelstorm, and Abaddon back to the drawing board and came back with something that _adds_ to the ship lineup like the Rokh adds to the caldari lineup. Yeah... ppl should start fitting faction gyrostabs. Will drive up the price even more, not to mention demand in such a situation would far outstrip supply. Great plan! "When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car." RKK Ranking: (MIN14)
Nifel Caldari Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.27 08:23:00 - [128] Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 07:55:13 Originally by: Nifel Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/10/2006 11:05:29 About the Maelstrom (very brief) The problems as a artillery platform * 8 projectile turrets with no dmg bonus means its not better at alpha strikes than the apoc or any other 8-turret battleship. Needs a damage bonus to get a valuable role in fleets. Err... it is? The tempest for example has more alphastrike than the apoc with 8x tachyons. A maxed out tempest pilot will have the equalivent of 7.5 turrets. The Maelstorm will have 8 turrets. 8 > 7.5 = QED. I meant the apoc with projectiles here. Of course tachs dont have the alpha of projectiles. So Tempest doesnt have more alphastrike than the projectile apoc. Like you say here, it has 7.5 effective turrets of alpha strike. Apoc has 8. Maelstrom will have higher alpha than the Tempest, yes. By 0.5 turrets. Right... so again why does it need a dmg bonus when it already outdamages the tempest to make it a worthwhile ship? Ships have been given a rather healthy hp boost and you want to give a 8-turret howizter ship a damage bonus in the light of that? Give me more survivability (10% shield hp or 5% shield resistance) and I'll jump into that baby without a second thought. It'd make a great fleet ship compared to the tempest which is merely a (very) good fleet ship. "When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car." RKK Ranking: (MIN14)
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.27 08:36:00 - [129] Originally by: Nifel Right... so again why does it need a dmg bonus when it already outdamages the tempest to make it a worthwhile ship? Ships have been given a rather healthy hp boost and you want to give a 8-turret howizter ship a damage bonus in the light of that? Give me more survivability (10% shield hp or 5% shield resistance) and I'll jump into that baby without a second thought. It'd make a great fleet ship compared to the tempest which is merely a (very) good fleet ship. It needs a damage bonus because there is no reason to use it over any other 8 turret battleship otherwise. If the other battleships get bonuses to give them a specific role, why doesnt the Maelstrom? You know that ROF and shield boost are probably the worst bonuses possible for a fleet ship. Sure, if you increase its survivability by shield hp and resists, then at least it gets some bonuses that fits its role. Thats all I ask. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Nifel Caldari Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.27 09:21:00 - [130] Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 08:39:13 Originally by: Nifel Right... so again why does it need a dmg bonus when it already outdamages the tempest to make it a worthwhile ship? Ships have been given a rather healthy hp boost and you want to give a 8-turret howizter ship a damage bonus in the light of that? Give me more survivability (10% shield hp or 5% shield resistance) and I'll jump into that baby without a second thought. It'd make a great fleet ship compared to the tempest which is merely a (very) good fleet ship. It needs a damage bonus because there is no reason to use it over any other 8 turret battleship otherwise. If the other battleships get bonuses to give them a specific role, why doesnt the Maelstrom? You know that ROF and shield boost are probably the worst bonuses possible for a fleet ship. Sure, if you increase its survivability by shield hp and resists, then at least it gets some bonuses that fits its role. Thats all I ask. But to be honest, I think the ship is meant to be small gang support at medium range. Thats why all these discussions about a role in a fleet is probably just making the devs shake their heads. Its not the ships purpose, judging from its current bonuses. However, I dont see why you would use the Maelstrom instead of the Tempest for small gangs. The shield boost is only useful when taking fire from a small number of ships. Otherwise, it just wont have time to get useful. Go ahead and jump into that apoc/abaddon with 8 1400 II's and a rof of 14-15 seconds or so (iirc). I'll stick with the maelstorm in that case thank you. By that logic we should see loads of 1400mm-fitted apocs already, which we don't. We see tempests instead. And as for what the devs have said about the maelstorm, tux said he wanted it to be a shieldtanking artillery platform. And yes... for small/medium gangs the bonus fits, somewhat. Problem is that if you're gonna go in close/medium range with an artillery setup you're better off with tracking computers than an active shield tank. So then you end up with a long range setup if you want to hit + tank effectively and all of the sudden you're left with fleet distances. Better then to change the shield boost bonus to something that allows for both scenarios and allows for more flexibility. With a hp/res bonus you're still extremely useful in the active tanking department in small/medium gangs, but it also broadens the applications of the ship to include fleet fights. What is there not to like? "When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car." RKK Ranking: (MIN14)

Logan Xerxes Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.10.27 09:31:00 - [131] Edited by: Logan Xerxes on 27/10/2006 09:33:50 FINALLY I get the link working... Fun with graphs! as you can see the Mega will still put out more damage than the Rokh in sub-60km ranges. And let's be honest, a majority of all fights occur below this range. "Draw them in with the prospect of gain, take them by confusion." -Sun Tzu
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.27 09:31:00 - [132] Originally by: Nifel Better then to change the shield boost bonus to something that allows for both scenarios and allows for more flexibility. With a hp/res bonus you're still extremely useful in the active tanking department in small/medium gangs, but it also broadens the applications of the ship to include fleet fights. What is there not to like? I like it, but it needs 10% shield hp per level if its going to get a shield hp bonus. The lower shield recharge rate of the Maelstrom (1500s instead of 2000s) might then allow it to build up a fairly decent passive tank. The resistance bonus would be even better, but thats taken by Caldari... and as far as I know, they dont like to give it to other races. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.27 09:33:00 - [133] Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 09:33:34 Yes, the Rohk has range, and luckily its not a dps monster as well. --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Logan Xerxes Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.10.27 09:42:00 - [134] Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 27/10/2006 09:33:34 Yes, the Rohk has range, and luckily its not a dps monster as well. Then have a gander at this graph.... Graph2 Runs like a little girl from the Abaddon "Draw them in with the prospect of gain, take them by confusion." -Sun Tzu
Aramendel Amarr Queens of the Stone Age Anarchy Empire	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:09:00 - [135] With a 3 active harderner setup. Heeello, RMR is here. Try it with 3 EAN2.
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:21:00 - [136] Edited by: Toaster Oven on 27/10/2006 10:22:39 Proposal: Abbadon No one is really too happy with the Abbadon. I propose that you redesign it as a mixed laser-drone platform. Not as drone oriented as it's Gallente counterpart, Abbadon will require usage of lasers to compete with it's peers (ie Nos+Drone combo not feasible). Here it is, plain and simple: Abbadon 7-5-7 175m3 drone bay 6 turret hardpoints Bonuses: 10% bonus to Large Energy Turret capacitor use per skill level 10% bonus to drone hitpoints and damage per skill level NOS + drone combo is not feasible. On Abbadon it would leave it vulnerable as it can't carry backup waves of drones like Domi can. Focus is on combining damage with some versatility, something Amarr lacks atm. We don't need another turret ship. Especially one that's utterly dependent on cap boosters.
Zarch AlDain Friends of Everyone	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:21:00 - [137] Actually I saw an idea for the minmatar one earlier in the thread that seemed quite original - and works with the race well. Minmatar already have a flexible ship, they already have a fleet sniper. They need something new. Minmatar get target painting boni, we all know that...but people aren't hugely impressed...but what else do minmatar use? Missiles. What missiles are really helped by target painters? Torps! So you get the new minmatar ship: 8 High slots, 7 or 8 launcher hard points, 3 or 4 turret hardpoints 5 Mid slots 7 Low slots Bonus: 10% per level on target painter range and effectiveness Bonus: 10% per level on torpedo rate of fire It's an armour tanking torpedo firing beast, using target painters to get proper effectiveness from its torpedos. Different from all the other battleships out there (even the raven) as its torpedo only but has a target painter bonus to let it use torps effectively. It has enough mid slots to run a target painter or two and maybe a web (+warp scram for PvP) it has enough low slots to build a good armour tank even without a tanking bonus. Sounds pretty good to me :) Zarch AlDain
Leandro Salazar Aeon Industries	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:22:00 - [138] Originally by: Nifel Go ahead and jump into that apoc/abaddon with 8 1400 II's and a rof of 14-15 seconds or so (iirc). I'll stick with the maelstorm in that case thank you. By that logic we should see loads of 1400mm-fitted apocs already, which we don't. We see tempests instead. That is exactly why people are arguing for a damage bonus. They don't fly projo apocs now because the alpha-advantage of 8 turrets with no damage bonus is negligible, but the additional cost associated with it is not. It will be the same with the Mael. Even worse maybe. Only people having too much money and/or not caring about money will fly a ship in a fleet that (probably) costs 50% more in ship price and 33% more in guns, for a whooping 6.66% more damage... This might not apply to you seeing how you are in BoB, but not everyone is rich or in a rich big alliance owning T2 BPOs. --------- ZOMG my sig was concordokkened! Link removed due to bad language on remote site. -wystler
Amira Silvermist Yazata Spenta Aegis Militia	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:26:00 - [139] Edited by: Amira Silvermist on 27/10/2006 10:26:09 Originally by: Forsch YES to a big arbitrator. Slots: 7/6/6, 4 turret, 3 launcher Drone bay: 175m¦ or 200m¦ (5 heavy, 5 medium and optional 5 light) Bonus1: 10% per level for tracking disruptor optimal range Bonus2a: 10% drone hp/dmg per level Bonus2b: 5% armor resists per level (This means either 2a or 2b. I'd prefer 2a but if that comes to close to the domi, 2b would be fine, too.) I absolutely support that idea! The Abaddon needs a unique role.
DanMck Amarr Rionnag Alba Ratel Alliance	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:35:00 - [140] my 10p for the Abbadon , we don't need a bigger drone bay or missiles we just need the ability to fire our guns for longer , espically if the fights will last longer there is no fun or tatics in a ship that you run out of cap in regardless of nos use or not increase the default cap by half and leave the rest the same

Tharrn Amarr 1st Praetorian Guard Vigilia Valeria	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:41:00 - [141] Speak for yourself. Flying Amarr ships only I'd kill for a drone or missile boat. Yes, I trained both. Thanks to the idiots who claim Amarr are not flexible :P I just don't want to be forced to train for the Caldari alpha-race. Now recruiting!
Nifel Caldari Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:45:00 - [142] Originally by: Leandro Salazar Originally by: Nifel Go ahead and jump into that apoc/abaddon with 8 1400 II's and a rof of 14-15 seconds or so (iirc). I'll stick with the maelstorm in that case thank you. By that logic we should see loads of 1400mm-fitted apocs already, which we don't. We see tempests instead. That is exactly why people are arguing for a damage bonus. They don't fly projo apocs now because the alpha-advantage of 8 turrets with no damage bonus is negligible, but the additional cost associated with it is not. It will be the same with the Mael. Even worse maybe. Only people having too much money and/or not caring about money will fly a ship in a fleet that (probably) costs 50% more in ship price and 33% more in guns, for a whooping 6.66% more damage... This might not apply to you seeing how you are in BoB, but not everyone is rich or in a rich big alliance owning T2 BPOs. The difference in relative cost regarding guns is 2x 1400mm II. If you can't afford that you shouldn't be flying BS anyway. Ship price doesn't matter once insurance comes into play. And the reason people don't fly artillery-apocs is because after the first volley the ship is subpar to everything. And I'm more inclined to believe that the people that argue for a damage bonus, do it because it'd be the ***** pwn in fleetbattles. Which is exactly why I don't think it'll ever happen. Basically... asking for a damage bonus for the Maelstorm is asking for a ship that bypasses the hp buffs. "When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car." RKK Ranking: (MIN14)**
Sniser 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2006.10.27 10:52:00 - [143] Originally by: Toaster Oven Edited by: Toaster Oven on 27/10/2006 10:22:39 No one is really too happy with the Abbadon. this is not true. Im happy with abaddon if it had a bit more powergrid than maelstorm and it had a bit more Cap and Cap reg to help firing the weapons It's great being Amarr, ain't it?
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.10.27 11:05:00 - [144] Edited by: Toaster Oven on 27/10/2006 11:05:54 Originally by: Sniser this is not true. Im happy with abaddon if it had a bit more powergrid than maelstorm and it had a bit more Cap and Cap reg to help firing the weapons You are in the vast minority. The amount of whining on the forum is clear evidence. One post by you does not stand up to the hundreds of complaints lodged thus far. And to look at it objectively. How much would you need to boost Abbadon cap to be viable? Enough to be able to fire it's guns continuously? There's no way in hell devs would ever give it a base cap regen of 60cap/s with max skills. Would be nice, but I'm not holding my breath...
Udyr Vulpayne Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2006.10.27 11:07:00 - [145] Originally by: Toaster Oven Proposal: Abbadon ... 7-5-7 175m3 drone bay 6 turret hardpoints Bonuses: 10% bonus to Large Energy Turret capacitor use per skill level 10% bonus to drone hitpoints and damage per skill level the dronebay is too small. should be at least 200m3 for 1 wave of each hvy, med and small. preferably 250m3 for 2 waves of heavy drones. domi has 3 waves btw. also i would prefer it without a bonus to its guns as that would make it pretty close to the domi & vexor design. gallente seem to go for drones + weapons bonus (well not the new bc but the others) while the arbi hulls gain most if not all damage from drones and have a support role instead of damage. gonna post some abaddon ideas later
Sniser 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2006.10.27 11:15:00 - [146] Edited by: Sniser on 27/10/2006 11:15:28 Originally by: Toaster Oven Edited by: Toaster Oven on 27/10/2006 11:05:54 Originally by: Sniser this is not true. Im happy with abaddon if it had a bit more powergrid than maelstorm and it had a bit more Cap and Cap reg to help firing the weapons You are in the vast minority. The amount of whining on the forum is clear evidence. One post by you does not stand up to the hundreds of complaints lodged thus far. And to look at it objectively. How much would you need to boost Abbadon cap to be viable? Enough to be able to fire it's guns continuously? There's no way in hell devs would ever give it a base cap regen of 60cap/s with max skills. Would be nice, but I'm not holding my breath... Im not speaking about be able to fire guns continously maybe for 1 or 2 min more. And enough powergrid to be able fit guns. Armor rep and turret rigs(they use pg). A bit more cap helps a lot when you use cpr. We may have to use cpr to be able substain shooting our guns but the other races will need use RCU to be able fit turret rigs since their will dont have enough powergrid to do it. I think this is called balance... It's great being Amarr, ain't it?
Mashie Saldana Hooligans Of War	Posted - 2006.10.27 11:19:00 - [147] Originally by: Mysterlee Edited by: Mysterlee on 26/10/2006 11:02:27 Edited by: Mysterlee on 26/10/2006 10:54:53 The abaddon should become a big arbitrator but not so good that it outclasses the dominix. 8-6-5 slot layout with 5 turret hardpoints and 5 missile hardpoints, 10% laser cap reduction (or 10% drone damage) and 5% tracking disruptor effectiveness per level with a 200m3 drone bay. Well that setup with 4 turret, 4 launchers and 10% drone damage will make it a Typhoon on steroids and will easily outclass a Dominix as well. After all with the current grid you could fit 8 heavy NOS + tank and still do the same drone damage as a NOSDomi. Or fit it like a Typhoon but with 4 Siege, 4 Tach, 5 T2 Ogres and a super tank. Not to mention you will put the DPS of a Typhoon to shame in the process. Simply you can't give a drone bonus to a ship that has 2.5x the grid of a Dominix.
Aramendel Amarr Queens of the Stone Age Anarchy Empire	Posted - 2006.10.27 11:37:00 - [148] Originally by: Mashie Saldana Simply you can't give a drone bonus to a ship that has 2.5x the grid of a Dominix. If it would be changed this way (which I hostely doubt, no matter how much justified complaining will happen, I would bet 100 mil that the aba will be virtually unchanged (exept perhaps a bit more grid) when kali goes live)..er..where was I? Anyway, IF if it would be changed this way obviously the grid would have to be reduced as well.
Ysolde Xen Minmatar Liberal Trading Co Electus Matari	Posted - 2006.10.27 12:17:00 - [149] Are we sure that the shield recharge time of the Maelstrom isn't just a typo that's going to be 'fixed'? ----- It's not a crap ship, you're just flying it all wrong.
Udyr Vulpayne Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2006.10.27 12:19:00 - [150] some ideas on what could make the abaddon different from the already existing amarrian battleships: 1. big arbitrator: 6-5-8 (or 7-5-7) 3 turrets 2 launchers 250m3 dronespace (minimum should be 200m3) 20% optimal range for tracking disruptors 10% drone dmg/hp bs size version of the arbitrator. instead of td efficency bonus it gets a range bonus like the scorp to be used agaisnt other longrange bs. enough dronespace for 2 waves of heavy drones (domi has 3 waves). like the arbi it deals most of its damage with its drones and has mixed turret/launcher hardpoints. in contrast to the domi it is less focused on wepaons and direct damage and more a support ship (something amarr really needs) like it is already with arbi and vexor. -- 2. current abaddon + tanking with missiles 8-4-7 8 turrets 6 launchers 5% laser damage or rof 5% armor resistance basicly like it is now but with unbonused launchers so it has a viable weapon for use when tanking. without missile bonuses those will not be anywhere near the ravens capabilities so theres no problem with it becoming a better missile spammer and it doesnt have to resort to matari weapons to tank without capusing weapons. also gives amarr a chance to deal non em/therm damage. -- 3. laser sniper 8-4-7 8 turrets 10% laser optimal range 10& laser cap use reduction (or 5% armor resistanc) does what the name says. sniping with lasers. less damage than the tux proposed one but better range. 2nd bonus either laser sustainability or resistance like it has now. its still yet another laser boat but at least it will give us something we dont already have with a dedicated sniper instead of just being a better geddon. -- 4. dedicated tanker 6-5-8 4 launchers 150m3 dronespace 5% armor resitance 10% nos/neut ammount or 7.5% repair boost or cap recharge or some other tanking or logistics bonus deals damage with drones and unbonused launchers while tanking real nice. didnt add any turret slots as lasers arnt all that good for tanking anyway. if targetting members of your own gang was easier and quicker the 2nd bonus could also become a logistics bonus for remote armor reppers for example.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.