Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Clementina
The Scope
6
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:19:00 -
[121] - Quote
I also noticed that you have to log on in order to see CAOD, The Recruitment subforum can be seen while logged off, but the heart of the smack requires a log on for some reason. |
Yuki Kulotsuki
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
1456
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:22:00 -
[122] - Quote
Maybe it's to protect the gentle eyes of prospective subscribers. |
Mangala Solaris
Blue Republic
5
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:24:00 -
[123] - Quote
CCP Fallout wrote:Grimpak wrote:problem 5: images, where are they? problem 6: Quote:look at all the wasted space in this quote Images will return in the next iteration of the forums. This will include signature images.
Lies, You guys dont Iterate.
|
Chal0ner
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
2
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:25:00 -
[124] - Quote
Akita, seriously
#4: CTRL+scroll wheel? Works brilliantly for readability. (At least if you got a scroll wheel and FF)
#5: Definately sucks ...
#6: YMMV but for me they don't suck but somehow address #4. |
Triple Entendre
Emergence Incorporated
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:28:00 -
[125] - Quote
gtiness wrote:Akita T wrote:AND THEY JUST CLOSED THE OLD FORUM DOWN COMPLETELY.
Gah !
he mad. "Wasted" space maybe, but I think it helps improve readability. Not everyone enjoys walls of text you know?
Now we have towers of text instead! :D |
Triple Entendre
Emergence Incorporated
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:28:00 -
[126] - Quote
Posts not going through? Another reason to add to the list. |
Phantom Slave
Universal Pest Exterminators
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:29:00 -
[127] - Quote
Couple of issues I have so far:
- Middle-Mouse clicking on a forum thread should ONLY open a new tab for the page, not open a new tab and direct the page I clicked to also open the same thread. I don't need 2 copies of the same thread open.
- Clicking on a thread link when there are multiple pages of that thread should open the FIRST page of the thread, not the last. I'm opening the thread to see what it's about, not the ending replies to it.
|
Lost'In'Space
196
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:32:00 -
[128] - Quote
I agree with many points already been made, plz fix it CCP |
Saint Lazarus
Pwn 'N Play Chaos Theory Alliance
164
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:34:00 -
[129] - Quote
I assume its been said but again n again but....
FIX SIGS!!!! |
sableye
principle of motion
174
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:37:00 -
[130] - Quote
I agree with most of what you said, also I get alot of error pages popping up saying its down as I move between pages. |
|
Mamba Lev
BricK sQuAD.
47
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:39:00 -
[131] - Quote
Close old forum that worked badly, replace with new forum that works badly for different reasons, classic CCP. |
Yuki Kulotsuki
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
1456
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:40:00 -
[132] - Quote
Akita, you'll want to update one of your points. Clicking on thread title takes you to the first page you posted on. My first is on 4 and I keep getting directed there. |
Niraia
Zaratha Zarati Shaktipat Revelators
19
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:41:00 -
[133] - Quote
Were there any good reasons stated for not migrating the last 8 years of forum history? Was it too difficult? |
HaulerJohn
Ore Mongers BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:42:00 -
[134] - Quote
smells like **** in here
i like it |
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
4
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:44:00 -
[135] - Quote
Mamba Lev wrote:Close old forum that worked badly, replace with new forum that works badly for different reasons, classic CCP.
Sledgehammer finetuning. |
Clementina
The Scope
6
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:45:00 -
[136] - Quote
Currently, if you are logged on and click the title of a thread, it brings you to the last page in a thread. This is not good. People who have not read the thread will be dropped onto the last page rather than the first page where they belong. You also don't want to get people used to not reading the Original Post, as that causes trollish Too Long, Didn't Read style 'responses'
Clicking on the title of a thread should always bring the user to the top of the first page. |
Linda Shadowborn
Dark Steel Industries
12
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:52:00 -
[137] - Quote
oh.. did i mention, you scroll all the way down to read a thread. Ok thats nice i want to go to a new folder now.. oh.. yeah scroll all the way back UP to get to the navigation bar.. why isnt there one at the bottom too? I mean.. really?
edit. oh yeah there is that little tiny "top" arrow isnt there? *chuckles* but still.. why be forced to click that to go to the selection when it is easier to have it at the bottom as well.. like oh all other forums i know |
Yuki Kulotsuki
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
1456
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:55:00 -
[138] - Quote
Clementina wrote:Currently, if you are logged on and click the title of a thread, it brings you to the last page in a thread. This is not good. People who have not read the thread will be dropped onto the last page rather than the first page where they belong. You also don't want to get people used to not reading the Original Post, as that causes trollish Too Long, Didn't Read style 'responses'
Clicking on the title of a thread should always bring the user to the top of the first page. It's worse than that. Try it for a thread you've posted in.
On the bright side no post timer. |
Alonzo Harris
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 17:59:00 -
[139] - Quote
Too crude, small text areas and too much attention on other stuff that the posts themselves.
I hate this forum, I really do. |
Kalissa
Sacred Templars RED.OverLord
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:05:00 -
[140] - Quote
I have to be honest and I say I like the new forums, I like the font, I have absolutely no trouble in reading any of it. I have no issue with them not importing the old forums the fact they're archived means anyone who wants to pour over eve's history can when they want, sure it'd be nice to have images back but as has been said they will be coming back in future.
So yup, overall I like em' |
|
Cassadin
Trailer Park Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:06:00 -
[141] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Problem 1 : Why are the sides cut off at an arbitrary width for absolutely no good reason ?
And no, to look at pretty Incursion-themed background pictures is not a good reason at all. There are two ways to fix this : either make them span 100% of the available width (quick and dirty) or make the width user-modifiable.
I completely agree with this. Make it span 100% or allow us to choose. It's rather irritating to make us scroll down more often if the only reason is make it "pretty."
Also, another person posted some valid functionality problems as listed below.
1) I commonly open up multiple topics in new tabs using my middle mouse button. On these new forums, it successfully does that - but ALSO loads the current page to that topic as well. Please fix this.
2) Make it user-preference whether the opening of a topic sends you to the last post or the first post.
|
Imiarr Timshae
Funny Men In Funny Hats
2
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:07:00 -
[142] - Quote
CCP Fallout wrote:Grimpak wrote:problem 5: images, where are they? problem 6: Quote:look at all the wasted space in this quote Images will return in the next iteration of the forums. This will include signature images.
"We gave you something "better" that is actually worse than the old version, but don't worry, we're fixing it!" CCPGäó |
Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams The KWFL Republic
34
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:09:00 -
[143] - Quote
Akita T wrote: Problem 7 : IMG tags, where are they ?
Sure, MOST subforums in the old format were not permitted to have images in them, but in some, they were. Also, the whole policy against ANY images at all is ever so slightly hypocritical, considering everything else. For starters, the fact you can select NOT to see any of those images if you don't like (say, if you're on a small bandwidth connection), and also the fact that we now get spoon-fed huge portraits. Plus all the junk in the background. Fix : bring image embed capability back, and limit image SIZE that's allowed instead of simply denying the possibility to post images at all.
Problem 8 : Signatures.
They don't work properly (i.e. "the way we were used to"). Fix : err... fix them ?
These two problems are tied together and it's ******* shameful that CCP would lock the entirety of the old forums and force us to use this (clearly beta) version of the new forums. Fix this NAO so much rage for this shortsightedness. I WANT MY ZAGWST SIG!
Entirely fitting that my first post in these forums should be an emorage also \o/
p.s. important testing of profanity filter in this post |
I'thari
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
27
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:12:00 -
[144] - Quote
Screenspace usage.... you do know there are resolutions other than 320x240? and not only 4:3 monitors?
And yes, you should have moved all old stuff here. Oh, you must be out of people to manually retype posts in sensible amount of time....
What about forum settings? Text size anyone? Why not add thread/post amount per page there as it made in all sensible forums?
WTF with constant "gankings"? This stuff barely works. While I'm at it, that page doesn't take you back if you open it in separate tab, so it almost useless.
WHY you take me to some random post in thread when I click on threat title? No it not always something I managed to read thanks to gankings.
Where am I supposed to get list of working tegs? Again, why disable something that was working quite fine (like [size])?
Quotes....
Quote: should be like this!
WHY should we look for workarounds when you supposed to simply do somehting fine in the first place?
likes.... shove them up your empty head. You obviously need somehting to think with. Could have made evmail to serve as PM on forum - would be much more usefull. Better yet, cold have made forums look better overall (text/space usage).
Why text in preview and last 10 posts is still tiny? If you don't want people to actually read those then you should just remove these features.
multiquote? Not that I often use it, but handy since you think that people only ever open one page/tab of forum.
Forum for trial accounts? While nice to have in theory, I fear post timer will be back with new, even more ridiculous restrictions....
6k characters post limit, really? make it 10k at least. It's supposed to be a foum board, not a chat.
Oh, well... it's not like they will do anything about it anyway. |
Ban Doga
Plain Vanilla
21
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:17:00 -
[145] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Back on topic : It's not like we have not complained about most of these things for months. Yet somehow, the forums went live with everything ignored.
And you really expected anything else? It's the same company that ignores issues pointed out on the test server. No surprises here...
|
J Kunjeh
38
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:22:00 -
[146] - Quote
God, what a bunch of whiny bitches. Why don't all you whiners try posting constructive feedback instead of going off the handle at every little perceived slight? Civil discussions FTW. |
Steijn
Quay Industries
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:26:00 -
[147] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:God, what a bunch of whiny bitches. Why don't all you whiners try posting constructive feedback instead of going off the handle at every little perceived slight? Civil discussions FTW.
I thought constructive criticism had already been given in the other thread on the old forum and as it seems, generally ignored by CCP. |
mvrck22
Pegasus Tech INVICTUS.
24
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:28:00 -
[148] - Quote
Steijn wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:God, what a bunch of whiny bitches. Why don't all you whiners try posting constructive feedback instead of going off the handle at every little perceived slight? Civil discussions FTW. I thought constructive criticism had already been given in the other thread on the old forum and as it seems, generally ignored by CCP.
He probably didn't even read the abundance of constructive posts in this thread either since clicking on the link put him right at the last post instead of at the beginning
|
Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams The KWFL Republic
34
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:29:00 -
[149] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:God, what a bunch of whiny bitches. Why don't all you whiners try posting constructive feedback instead of going off the handle at every little perceived slight? Civil discussions FTW. Fine First off, there are some cool features in here. I like the big avatars, the whole thing seems faster, I like the new layout. The hover preview of the first few lines in a thread is extremely cool, glad they added that. The new additions/features of this forum are fairly well polished, and a great change to the old system.
However, basic functionality has been removed, Many parts of this forum are a downgrade from the old forums, and there are many many bugs that should have been worked out in the alpha stages. The main reason I'm pissed about this is because this is clearly not finished, yet we are being forced to use it.
How would you feel if they shut down tranquility and told everyone to go use SiSi until Incarna is released? |
J Kunjeh
38
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 18:31:00 -
[150] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:God, what a bunch of whiny bitches. Why don't all you whiners try posting constructive feedback instead of going off the handle at every little perceived slight? Civil discussions FTW. Fine First off, there are some cool features in here. I like the big avatars, the whole thing seems faster, I like the new layout. However, basic functionality has been removed, Many parts of this forum are a downgrade from the old forums, and there are many many bugs that should have been worked out in the alpha stages. The main reason I'm pissed about this is because this is clearly not finished, yet we are being forced to use it. How would you feel if they shut down tranquility and told everyone to go use SiSi until Incarna is released?
Much, much better.
I'm not saying there aren't legit issues that need to be discussed and fixed. I'm only suggesting that maybe there's a more civil way to go about dialogging with CCP on these kinds of things. Raging isn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |