Which they quite literally reserve the right to do in the licensing agreement you agreed to when you started your account(s).

I've honestly lost track of what you guys are arguing at this point.

That is not news to me, and if you can make hardware and can't make OS to run software on, you will need to hire an entity to create it or do it or run it.
Hardware is not designed to run software without OS.
Even console systems like PS3 or other have their own OS.

So, you are interpreting some of the info you mention as if to try to steal from me or try to discredit me, or both.


Edit:
The communication system is also unforgiving enough to cause blatant errors such as the omission of the quoted text from you, and make it too hard to verify how it occured and why enough to be at peace with it.

except that they have neither allowed or disallowed any specific programs within the eula The eula is what has been agreed to. and last i checked i didnt sign a eula that said windows ok, everything else no. Any alteration to the eula must be updated and reaccepted. If there was a specification of programs they must be in the eula and not some forum post that most people dont even read.

Yes everything has a operating system, except a device that does not have a operating system.No one is talking about hardware running without a operating system.

Actually they couldnt ban anyone just because they do something they dont like. As the subscription is a contract. And i disagree that they have as much leeway as you claim. This brings me back to the overlays and having real time information. They have a issue with that. By having more than one client open at any one time you have that real time information. Windows does that.

A device that does not have a operating system is not a hardware device that is considered to be a computer.
I just did talk about hwardare running or , not running rather, without an operating system.
Edit:
(hardware not hwardare, I don't refer to radar, either radar on a carrier or with dropped carrier...)

If you try to load an XT without a BIOS and OS floppy loaded to boot it, it will not run the OS.

Edit 2:
a :roll also was also added from a 3rd party, or 4th party.

I built my computer. before i installed a operating system it was still a computer.

lol there you go again off topic. no one is talking about hardware rights.

...edit: think he is just trolling

I built my computer. before i installed a operating system it was still a computer.

edit: to the stalker. Yes the eula is the contract. And therefore they cannot ban you because you do something they dont like. It has to be a violation of the eula specificly. And while inital discretion is theres according to the eula, once a decision has been made regarding a program it must be added to the eula and not some forum post that most players dont read and 0 players give their consent to. Cannot change the eula without a new eula and a forum post declaring new activities or programs being valid or invalid is a change in the eula. Before you could do it, now you cant= eula changed.

You seem to be missing the point in regards to the simple phrase, "in their discretion." I don't think you quite grasp that it's not only extremely vague but it's intentionally that way. The eula has not changed, their discretion has. Hence... "their discretion."

You dont seem to grasp how discretion from one eula to another can mean different things. old eula discretion ment that you could do it. New eula discretion means you cannot. Its the same word but has a different meaning.

A device that does not have a operating system is not a hardware device that is considered to be a computer.
I just did talk about hwardare running or , not running rather, without an operating system.
Edit:
(hardware not hwardare, I don't refer to radar, either radar on a carrier or with dropped carrier...)

If you try to load an XT without a BIOS and OS floppy loaded to boot it, it will not run the OS.

Edit 2:
a :roll also was also added from a 3rd party, or 4th party.

It means neither... It means they can decide on a case by case basis what to allow and what not to allow. You are seriously grasping at straws and I'm done wasting my time trying to talk any sense to the senseless. If you think you can interpret it however you want then go ahead. I'll look forward to your "I've been banned and it's not fair" post in GD.

Sorry if you feel that debunking your ideas are grasping at straws lol. It is as i said though. I really dont see any legal reasoning for me being banned though but you wait there and stalk for me maybe just maybe one day in thet far future(however long eve lasts) when I am done with eve i might show up there just to wave bye to my haters.

edit: it was not a case by case basis. No one was banned for overlays before this. Botting, broadcasting,scripts of that sort yes. But not overlays. Discretion meant there was a blanket acceptance or at least nonaction against it. When that discretion changed to a no regarding this subject then indeed the word discretion when pertaining to overlays had changed.

Perhaps you banned me twice and I have to pay double to find out wheher or not.
Perhaps you support this kind of activity and are only trying to bait me into committing myself or be off topic or God knows what.

Perhaps, like me, you were unfairly banned 3 times already, as in 3 strikes in a baseball game.

Now see this" GÇ£We do not endorse or condone the use of any third party applications or other software that modifies the client or otherwise confers an unfair benefit to players. We may, in our discretion, tolerate the use of applications"
Since multiboxing is explicity allowed then it is reasonable to assume that a player with 10 accounts will have a just advantage over a player with 1 account. It doesnt say ccp has some overly vague discretion that is solely their to determine what confers an unfair benefit and therefore having 10 fully capable accounts running appears to really not be a violation of eula. It is completly reasonable to expect 10 accounts vs one to be fair game according to eula and a overlay that affects windows and not the eve client appears to be not against eula.

I'm not gonna read the whole thing, I'm on screen keyboard, with USB external power as backup power, ups.
They can do what they want.
They designed it like that.

Edit:
It's not the ground.
They may want details and explanations from you.
I don't know you yet and if I do I didn't know until I get more info.

If they mention reason x is why b happened, it doesn't really matter because of a.
If you omit their concern it may be your responsibility.
It may be a complain.
If the complain is malicious or invalid how will they find out?
Where is your analysis on balance of powers and why is it viable?
Is your credit scientific, legal, educational or other?
What about credit for art?
What about NDA?
Non-competition clauses?

The answer is probably 42

I prefer a billion trillion.
It's more worth it to me and every one can get a better share.
I can't do much with $42, and I got engaged to my only future wife at 43.
I would rather die without marrying someone else even if that meant war.
I'm sure that is very common as in common law.

but 42 could be anything, it can even be a boat, we have always wanted a boat.