Quote:

---

Originally Posted by
Well looks like released it before I could, but yes indeed (head of ISD events team) is of Evolution.


I actually was accepted into Aurora at one point but decided to stick with the Mod Squad and instead was an extra actor if they needed me (I believe I was only in one event as an actor).

The events team has always had several very fundamental flaws, which I was exposed to and indeed exploited while I was part of ISD as a moderator (the moderators and event actors/planners were on some of the same ISD IRC channels so had a good bit of contact).

Flaws such as:

--CCP has never had a very coherant plan about the storyline of Eve, and thus left events (and the planning for events) up to Aurora (the ISD events division). Aurora members were free to submit event ideas. These event ideas only needed to be reviewed by the head of Aurora, not by any GMs or Developers. Larger events (such as the multiple ones in Fountain) needed to be approved by devs I believe but I'm not sure how detailed that process was since I wasn't involved.

--Have a friend that's in Aurora? Prepare for easy lootz. I had a friend who'd leak a lot of events to me and who also would explain the engagement rules of the actors to me pretty often, allowing me to decide if I'd show up (if I was in the area) and have relatively little to no risk to my own ship, while having a very good chance of getting one of the rewards. I got a +4 Implant from a event when they weren't being dropped by agents yet.

I know in real life; some of his stories of Eve corruption are jaw-dropping and kinda sad.

---

Originally by: Richard Aiel

---

Edited by: Richard Aiel on 15/03/2007 14:40:01
*snip* - please keep it on topic. -Ivan K

I cant belive that I got snipped for being happy that im not in ban status anymore!!

Dont snip me! I may not be on topic but cmon.... like THIS thread has stayed on topic the whole time... if yer gonna snip MY stuff for going off topic then go back through and snip all off topic comments in the rest of the thread

---

Originally by: Karmae

---

Originally by: Richard Aiel

---

Edited by: Richard Aiel on 15/03/2007 14:40:01
*snip* - please keep it on topic. -Ivan K

I cant belive that I got snipped for being happy that im not in ban status anymore!!

Dont snip me! I may not be on topic but cmon.... like THIS thread has stayed on topic the whole time... if yer gonna snip MY stuff for going off topic then go back through and snip all off topic comments in the rest of the thread

---

Maybe the IA dept would be better handled if the mods run things... I mean at least they are reading the posts (in some manner at least). The lack of CCP response to a good dozen or so valid concerns from customers is disappointing. Welcome to CCP's dusty attic thread.

---

Originally by: s4mp3r0r

---

Any investigation into this ?

---

Originally by: CCP Arkanon

---

Originally by: Solothores

---

Just a question out of curiousity Arkanon:
If a corporation or an alliance would go for a "no developer" recruitment rule, would CCP tolerate and respect such a wish and ask their employees to refrain from joining?

Cheers
S.

---

That was asked before, I initially felt that it was a bit far fetched. But maybe it isn't, you could stop by our Features and Ideas Discussion forum and pitch the idea. Features have been picked out of there before.

Really, though, we're not a bad lot

---

Originally by: Xenofur

---

You claim the privacy policy is there to protect the individual involved. Does that mean that if an individual would give you permission to make the informations regarding his case public, would you accept that permission or continue to "protect the individual" even ageinst their own wish?

---

No, I will not publicize any private information about our customers, no matter who asks me to or who's permission I have.

---

Originally by: Natalie Scarlett

---

I will be honest... I have 0 (zero, nothing, nada) fate in your position and job. Why? Because you told us that who will assign a investigation will be a senior GM/DEV. The "selection/filter" of subject you will investigate will be complete biased... How is possible to imagine that some GM/DEV will handle you a case that the main suspect is GM/DEV? Do you really think that this "suspect" will handle a case that he is the main suspect? Come on... you dont need to be a genius to know that it wont work.

---

A suspect is not allowed to touch his case, other than to escalate it, if no one else is around to handle it. That's a good way to avoid matters being swept under the carpet. Petitions are never deleted either, so we'd have no problems verifying who did it, if something like that ever happened.

---

Originally by: MotherMoon

---

Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/05/2007 08:12:53
"For pure hilarity, I petitioned about GM policy concerning the allegations, that they should keep their trap shut until the investigation has been carried out.

Guess who responded to my petition

Yep.

Edit: Yes that's right, dev conduct by GM Kutsu is being handled by.....GM Kutsu."

---

Originally by: Zerv

---

Originally by: MotherMoon

---

Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/05/2007 08:12:53
"For pure hilarity, I petitioned about GM policy concerning the allegations, that they should keep their trap shut until the investigation has been carried out.

Guess who responded to my petition

Yep.

Edit: Yes that's right, dev conduct by GM Kutsu is being handled by.....GM Kutsu."

---

rofl... what a joke. CCP seriously.

---

Originally by: MotherMoon

---

Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/05/2007 08:12:53
"For pure hilarity, I petitioned about GM policy concerning the allegations, that they should keep their trap shut until the investigation has been carried out.

Guess who responded to my petition

Yep.

Edit: Yes that's right, dev conduct by GM Kutsu is being handled by.....GM Kutsu."

---

Originally by: Dianabolic

---

We have a "special" line (if you want to call msn that) to our FRIENDS.

Even devs need friends, you know, they're not robots.

---