EVE Search - Historic battle of F-TE1T(Delve)

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Historic battle of F-TE1T(Delve) - Quick Overview

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zeveron Generals Of Destruction Syndicate Terror In The System	Posted - 2007.03.31 11:05:00 - [211] Originally by: The Beatnuts Originally by: Blacklight There's no wonder lots of us are boycotting these forums these days. "OMG 5 BoB Dreads died" - mahoosive backslapping "OMG coalition lost a load of dreads" - dreads mean nothing we can replace them easily One could be excused for assuming that there is a -100 points of IQ penalty for posting on Eve-O given the utter stupidity of the comments on this forum. <.< 50dreads/7alliances = 7.1 dread/alliance 1titan/1alliance = 1 titan AAA didn't lose anything to BOB, we lost stuff to lag. You've only been doing what you do best, kill offline/laged ships. Congrats on that. Originally by: Blacklight Regardless of the outcome of this war the community deteriorates daily. I'll have to agree with that Blacklight. I have alot of fun see -A- complaining about lag :-) ---------------------------------- A desperate voice brakes the silence on the GODS coms:
Mss Alt The Alt Foundation	Posted - 2007.03.31 11:23:00 - [212] The thing is that the coalition, no matter what anybody says, didn't feck up. CCP did, big time. Saying "You know that it would be lag if you bring your fleet to finish what you started, so sit and do nothing." is retarded. We're paying to play the game, not join the lag fest or the sit and do nothing fest. There's no hardware on the market? Rewrite the damn code to use more than 1 node for the system instead of doing stupid things like walking in stations and replacing the old system map with the useless seamless map.
Caladet School of Applied Knowledge	Posted - 2007.03.31 11:37:00 - [213] Edited by: Caladet on 31/03/2007 11:35:39 <delete this>
Flash EF DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2007.03.31 11:38:00 - [214] Edited by: Flash EF on 31/03/2007 11:37:39 Edited by: Flash EF on 31/03/2007 11:35:46 Originally by: Zeveron Originally by: The Beatnuts Originally by: Blacklight There's no wonder lots of us are boycotting these forums these days. "OMG 5 BoB Dreads died" - mahoosive backslapping "OMG coalition lost a load of dreads" - dreads mean nothing we can replace them easily One could be excused for assuming that there is a -100 points of IQ penalty for posting on Eve-O given the utter stupidity of the comments on this forum. <.< 50dreads/7alliances = 7.1 dread/alliance 1titan/1alliance = 1 titan AAA didn't lose anything to BOB, we lost stuff to lag. You've only been doing what you do best, kill offline/laged ships. Congrats on that. Originally by: Blacklight Regardless of the outcome of this war the community deteriorates daily. I'll have to agree with that Blacklight. I have alot of fun see -A- complaining about lag :-) and i have a lot of fun see that u are judging situation even when u didnt seen what was happening in system with pos, system with fleet battle and even 3 systems from there... just to let u know - i was using 2 characters, 1 in capital ship and 1 in BS 1st one was at pos and i hardly could see more than 10 ships on my screen durning the time i was in the system and there was no pos on my screen (i was on the right moon :P) reps were working, my cap was holding, shield/armor = 100% and i lagged out - when GM moved me next day to system nextdoor i had 30% armor left and no cap........... and as for BS - we were traveling in small fleets (~100ppl) and last when we had about 5 jumps left it started to be a bit laggy - took each of us 10-15 minutes to actually jump to next system funny thing was that system next to f-t was set on the diferent node and there was no lag but unfortunatly less than 10 ppl menaged to warp and jump to that system and even if they did so they died to pet-camp :(
Zeveron Generals Of Destruction Syndicate Terror In The System	Posted - 2007.03.31 12:11:00 - [215] and you have no idea about what I am talking about. I wasnt there, but you haven fought -A- in a pos, with 100erds of jetted ships :-) I just said it was just funny seeing them complaining about lag. Didnt say anything about the specific fight, but I ll start lauphing more when/if BoB prooves there was nothing in the shipyards :-) ---------------------------------- A desperate voice brakes the silence on the GODS coms:
csebal Rage of Angels Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2007.03.31 15:25:00 - [216] c'mon bobbits and bob fanbois. grow up and stop telling the world that the coalition has lost this one. 1) Coalition went in with a clear goal to destroy the POS. They did that. Were there losses? Yeah.. Did they expect losses? Yeah.. Did they think that the price for destrying the POS was too high? Not that i know. Do you think so? It does not matter. Coalition might not have won, but has successfully finished the mission they started. End of story. 2) BOB's goal was to protect the POS and cause as many losses as possible. Unless ofc they never intended to save the POS, but from what i know, losing the POS was more like a distant possibility than anything seriously considered by BOB before the actual attack. So did BOB save the POS? No. Did they cause heavy losses? Yes. Does that constitute as a victory? Hardly.. they merely made up for failing their primary objective. Without the dread losses, we would be talking about BOB getting owned in its own space now. Bottomline: BOB might have the material advantage in terms of destroyed stuff, but the coalition came out morally victorious. They went there, did what they planned and left. BOB on the other hand - maybe first time in its history - failed to defend a POS that they were not merely actively defending, but defending with maybe the biggest force they've assembled until now. In their own version, both sides are right about who won. Problem is, both sides take the part of the engagement in which they can claim victory, and conveniently forget about the rest of it. Tie anyone? My post does not represent the general or official opinion of anyone else besides me. No matter what YOU believe. Rest.In.Peace HUN
Corak UA Industry	Posted - 2007.03.31 15:55:00 - [217] forum admins and CCP . on this forum and i think in game you are using good old Soviet Union politics ? you censored all what you don`t like . you delete all posts were is something what you don`t want to see ! wtf why you click topic ? W H Y
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.03.31 16:30:00 - [218] Originally by: WRWR anyways, we need confirm that fact from bob leaders, if they have some balls Why? If they tell you ansd show you that you hit an empty POS, you wouldn't believe them. Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.03.31 16:42:00 - [219] Originally by: Pariah Eutrophius Originally by: Buxaroo You think the coalition will be able to do this every single time? You think the coalition can withstand 40+ cap losses per engagement? YES, 40 dreads, all insured = bout 500mill loss per dread=20bill spread across 5 or so of the biggest alliances in game? derrrrrr 500mil? It's 300mil+ to fit a dread, and then you pay for insurance. It'd be closer to 1bil per ship imo, depending on who saved what wrecks. Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
Doddy Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2007.03.31 17:03:00 - [220] Originally by: Yakia TovilToba Nice report, has been looking for that, thanks. That rumour about Orange Species Titan loss is not true, i saw him in 3-f few hours after that. Proof: 2007.03.30 02:28:01 Combat Orange Species [DICE.]<BOB>(Ragnarok) hits you, doing 15067.8 damage. One interesting question: what happened to the Leviathan BPO ? Was it destroyed with the POS - or if not, who got it ? For the records: we are talking here about a bpo worth ~64 billion isk. Why would the bpo be in the pos?

Doddy Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2007.03.31 17:04:00 - [221] Originally by: Malthros Zenobia Originally by: Pariah Eutrophius Originally by: Buxaroo You think the coalition will be able to do this every single time? You think the coalition can withstand 40+ cap losses per engagement? YES, 40 dreads, all insured = bout 500mill loss per dread=20bill spread across 5 or so of the biggest alliances in game? derrrrrr 500mil? It's 300mil+ to fit a dread, and then you pay for insurance. It'd be closer to 1bil per ship imo, depending on who saved what wrecks. Bobs side claimed all wrecks
Acwron Minmatar Cataclysm Enterprises	Posted - 2007.03.31 17:44:00 - [222] Funny that anybody would defend the limit on local that was imposed. You are awear what the policy change means for large scale alliance attacks on capital yards or station system, right? Better adjust your strontium lvls to maximum asap because thats the only defense thats going to be possible.
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.03.31 18:03:00 - [223] Originally by: Doddy Originally by: Yakia TovilToba Nice report, has been looking for that, thanks. That rumour about Orange Species Titan loss is not true, i saw him in 3-f few hours after that. Proof: 2007.03.30 02:28:01 Combat Orange Species [DICE.]<BOB>(Ragnarok) hits you, doing 15067.8 damage. One interesting question: what happened to the Leviathan BPO ? Was it destroyed with the POS - or if not, who got it ? For the records: we are talking here about a bpo worth ~64 billion isk. Why would the bpo be in the pos? Because alot of people don't know that you can built at a POS without having the BPO there. There's no way the BPOs were there. Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
Entellas	Posted - 2007.04.02 00:09:00 - [224] Originally by: Macmuelli congratulations to the coalition. a Bitter taste.... 2:1 + no chance for a supprt fleet otherwise this fight has gone totaly to coaltion side To prevent the system node from crashing, a CCP GM limited the number of ships that could be in F-TE1T to roughly 600. The Coalition claims that this limit hindered about 60% of their attacking fleet from entering the system. The question remains of which side knew of the system ship cap that the GM enforced first. Sounds like BoB got some more help from GMs and CCP - it's good to have friends that can stack the deck. I want to get some of that


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.