| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Sheila Chandra
   |
Posted - 2007.11.29 07:12:00 -
[151]
Im just wondering how good it will be to deploy it so soon... Actually there isnt even the DX8 engine on testserver, and even what is currently on it crashed a dozend times within 2 days... im just curious how you can get it running stable within a week ??
|
Druadan
Gallente
Aristotle Enterprises
Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 07:15:00 -
[152]
 Originally by: Shadarle
Originally by: Galldar
Nerf the carrier..nerf the game..good job CCP on listening to your player base...
Carriers are not transports/freighters. You shouldn't be able to use the same ship for solo PvP, group PvP, PvE, AND transporting your goods. There shouldn't a single ship that does everything.
Read the GDF thread
You'll see the more reasonable among the carrier pilots were asking for a decrease in the capability of carriers' hauling abilities, instead of an illogical wholesale abandonment of the idea of a ship in the SMB being assembled. It's a damn double-standard to say that a ship in the SMB is assembled, but can't hold certain types of cargo. It's either assembled, or it isn't. We offered alternatives, and CCP feigned interest, which is better than the last carrier cargo nerf, where we were just ignored, but playing with us, pretending to listen to us just to placate us, is just childish. Would it have been so hard to prevent overloaded ships from being put in the SMB? The ship modules aren't effective when the ship isn't piloted, so if you fill a rigged, T2'd I-5 and then hop out of it, your cargo is like 35k m3 out of 6.5k m3. Just stop that scenario from happening, and force carrier-pilot haulers to be extremely inefficient, instead of implementing a half-arsed game mechanic to force the damn jump freighters down our throats.
That's what the ECM nerf did. The modules are inefficient on non-specialised boats, but you can still rig up a badger with jammers, or dampeners, for baiting. This whole game has a consistent element of freedom of choice about it. The freedom to fit a ship however you like, for established standard fitting or devious fits. This carrier nerf is indicative of a purely linear direction: use ship A for role B, or don't use it at all.
-Dru
|
GOd SAvior
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 07:17:00 -
[153]
Originally by: Jiks
Lot's of new stuff, much of it shiny, well done CCP for that.
However ... not so well done for ignoring literally thousands of comments on the Game Development Forum concerning the temporary killing of 0.0 logistics and crippling of interdictors with no sensible explaination for either to be honest.
Jiks
THIS, srsly. Nice to see ppl (or whos ever alts those are) wetting themselves over new graphics. Just so amazed about the ability to make so drastic changes without giving any kind of explanation to things (dictors, carriers etc). Do you really lack the words to back the changes or what is it that they can't be talked over?
|
Pottsey
Enheduanni Foundation
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 07:29:00 -
[154]
ôThe capacitor capacity penalty on all Capacitor Flux Coils has been reduced by 10%, but the recharge rate bonus has also been decreased to compensate.ö
Why not do the same for shield flux modules!
Passive shield tanking guide click here |
Oppus Edea
Ginnungagaps Rymdfarargille
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 08:32:00 -
[155]
Need for Speed (drones): The rate of fire for all drones has been doubled to decrease the number of server calls drones are making. Drone damage was doubled to balance the RoF change. Sentry drones and fighters are not affected by any of these changes.
So, drones have double the damage and double the ROF? Typo? :D
|
SeismicForce
Clear Horizon Industries
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 09:07:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Oppus Edea
Need for Speed (drones): The rate of fire for all drones has been doubled to decrease the number of server calls drones are making. Drone damage was doubled to balance the RoF change. Sentry drones and fighters are not affected by any of these changes.
So, drones have double the damage and double the ROF? Typo? :D
No, the ROF has been doubled, from 2 to 4 seconds. No typo.
Originally by: Allisie
In a recent interview, a dev mentioned that ships and skills cause lag and will be removed in EVE 2.
|
Oppus Edea
Ginnungagaps Rymdfarargille
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 09:14:00 -
[157]
Originally by: SeismicForce
No, the ROF has been doubled, from 2 to 4 seconds. No typo.
Ah, of course. Stupid me.
|
Chloey Rans
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 09:15:00 -
[158]
Are decryptor and other invention stuff drops removed
from cosmos sites? Number of hacking sites ise increased,
good, but i would like to know if the cosmos farming goes
on....
I don't find it in the patch notes
|
Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles
Zzz
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 09:35:00 -
[159]
Originally by: Oppus Edea
Originally by: SeismicForce
No, the ROF has been doubled, from 2 to 4 seconds. No typo.
Ah, of course. Stupid me.
Not really- the stat described by CCP as rate of fire is in fact the time between successive shots. It's a bit more elegant than stating that a torp launcher fires 0.076 missiles per second, but it needs relabelling.
My research services
Spreadsheets: Top speed calculation - Halo Implant stats |
Dale O'Brien
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 09:48:00 -
[160]
Originally by: Naga Elohim
I cannot see any graphical updates on the test server. I have a GeForce 6800 on both of my computers and i still can't see the new graphics. At one point in time Eve said my computer DID support new content but after this last test patch, that went away and i cant download a damn thing. Is this gonna be available to only those with $500 video cards or what. Im kinda dissapointed....
I'm sure it'll allow you if it did before. and to note. the graphics card I use Asus HD2600pro runs it perfectly along with alot of other games and supports DX10 and i got it for like $90 brand spanking new, tech is going down in price nowadays well in non-big-box-store retailers anyway. try www.NCIX.com if you live in canada or the US might do to get a new gfx card anyway :D(note: this is not an add I get all my junk from there myself and they're cheap and good so i suggest them :P)
|
Seph Res
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 09:53:00 -
[161]
technoviking is pleased
|
Mecinia Lua
Galactic Express
Frontier Trade League
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 10:32:00 -
[162]
Thank God its on Wednesday and not Tuesday morning, that means I can enjoy my extended weekend more :) (Assuming I don't get called into work again :( )
Thoughts expressed are mine and mine alone. They do not necessarily reflect my alliances thoughts. |
Garia666
Amarr
T.H.U.G L.I.F.E
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 10:35:00 -
[163]
altough i like the graphics and most changes..
i am still not that 2 happy.. ever since the nos changes most amarr ships suck / suck badly. doesnt realy matter how much sp you actualy have.. even with max skillz.
its time that amarr gets some loving..
->My Vids<- |
Farrellus Cameron
Sturmgrenadier Inc
R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 10:54:00 -
[164]
I do not see the Ishtar change with the removing of one of the mid slots mentioned. Is that going through?
----------------------------------------------------
|
Holy Cheater
Red Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 11:01:00 -
[165]
Don't touch my Eos 
|
Sazumaan Johnza
Minmatar
Southern Cross Incorporated
Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 11:13:00 -
[166]
MSI 8800GT OC FTW ;)
"Eve is more filling than roast steaks slowly grilling over a rotating fire whilst marinating in a combination of Australian fruity wines and the best imported herbs..." - SChimera [16.4.07] |
Janjan Jansen
Amarr
Primal Element
Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 11:15:00 -
[167]
Why are the rocks on strike in Vey??? I dont get that part. The rest looks really good.
|
MadWoof
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 11:25:00 -
[168]
Don't make me wait do it now "NOW I SAY".
Good job CCP
|
Darth Felin
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 11:55:00 -
[169]
Originally by: Farrellus Cameron
I do not see the Ishtar change with the removing of one of the mid slots mentioned. Is that going through?
This screenshot was a fake.
|
Dominat0r
Caldari
Death Monkey's With Knives
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 12:11:00 -
[170]
WOW!!!!!!
|
Blacknightt
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 12:20:00 -
[171]
From what Ive seen so far things are looking good. I will wait till it has been implemented to see what it really performs like.
I envisage possible problems in fleet battles with the extra graphics, its bad enough now.
I hope by doing this upgrade CCP will not forgo their commitment to fixing the problems the game already experiences.
Seeing is believing.
Good Luck.
Blacknightt
|
Matthew
Caldari
BloodStar Technologies
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 12:22:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Janjan Jansen
Why are the rocks on strike in Vey??? I dont get that part. The rest looks really good.
It probably means that the asteroid belts in Vey didn't actually have any asteroids in them (or the asteroids were way off-grid and not visible from the belt beacon). After the patch, the roids will be in the belt as they should be.
-------
There is no magic Wand of Fixing, and it is not powered by forum whines. |
Hoshi
Blackguard Brigade
Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 12:27:00 -
[173]
Originally by: Naga Elohim
I cannot see any graphical updates on the test server. I have a GeForce 6800 on both of my computers and i still can't see the new graphics. At one point in time Eve said my computer DID support new content but after this last test patch, that went away and i cant download a damn thing. Is this gonna be available to only those with $500 video cards or what. Im kinda dissapointed....
Your card supports the new graphics (but might be a bit slow). Maybe you turned of BITS in windows or something similar.
----------------------------------------
A Guide to Scan Probing in Revelations |
Didius Julianus
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 12:31:00 -
[174]
I have been hearing rumblings that the new HIC, Heavy Interdicor will be able to activate its warp bubble module in low sec, is that true. Can someone confirm please. If so, at what scramble strength (I assume 100%). I do hope not. If so, CCP has nerfed any small corporation from doing anything in 0.0 and render blockade runners and industrial ships useless in low sec without a gang.
Boo CCP if that is the case.
|
gordon861
Minmatar
Head Insurance Services
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 12:43:00 -
[175]
Any chance of releasing a full client as a bittorrent file during the 24hr DT so we can get the new client and graphics whilst waiting for the game to come back up ?
Originally by: CCP Arkanon
I frown on employees being power players to the extent that their gameplay results in any sort of domination over others. I donÆt believe CCP employees should run the EVE universe. |
Alekseyev Karrde
The Royal Guard
Giant Space Amoeba
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 13:01:00 -
[176]
Edited by: Alekseyev Karrde on 29/11/2007 13:02:28
I'm disappointed at the Eos nerf and sensor damp nerf, but even more so because ECM is getting an ginourmous buff!
The Eos will now have less DPS than it's T1 equivilent, and it's bread and butter warfare link is far less effective. It's now been reduced to just another nano hac bc by the extra lowslot addition and the reduced effectiveness of it's links. Now, it's an Ishtar, but even more nanoable. I thought Fleet Commandships were supposed to help their gangs not be solopwnntanknanomobiles?
As Sensor Dampeners get hit by the Script nerf, which i'm not altogether against, ECMs are getting a buff. ECM ships are getting an increase in their effectiveness bonuses and ECM itself is getting a *massive* cap reduction. Sensor Dampers: same cap as before, just less useful. Not to mention the Electronic Superiority link is only getting a reduction to it's benifits to dampening and tracking disrupter ships.
I would have liked to have seen the balance changes for the Eos been a bit more creative, and the nerfs for EWAR more even handed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-Alekseyev
Ambassador, Fleet Commander, Council Member
=The Royal Guard=
"=TRG=Public" Channel
www.rgrocks.com
|
Jarne
Increasing Success by Lowering Expectations
Enuma Elish.
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 13:08:00 -
[177]
"Corp standings toward an individual player can now be set through the Info window of that character."
How could that be done before?
-
Success=Achievements/Expectations
|
Avleron
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 13:14:00 -
[178]
im looking forward to this expantion in a big way.. but when u say "Trinity's Premium Graphics Content" does that mean their will be a charge for it. and also is their a supported card list avable ???
|
ThorMaNN
Gallente
Solstice Systems Development Concourse
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 13:18:00 -
[179]
Moving home, internet not up till 6th but day after i get to play trinity \o/
Fly Safe, Fly Gallente
YaRR MaTeY |
Andre Marconius
Gallente
House Of Troy
|
Posted - 2007.11.29 13:30:00 -
[180]
Just a quick question, how come the Ishkur has the same bandwidth as a normal frigate despite it supposedly being a drone ship?
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |