And if you knew your Uni history - you would actually realize/know that this mechanic (dissolving the alliance/corp) was discussed (either around the time just before I left, or just after I left).

It is not *fake* because it was considered.

Han Jagerbltizen, for instance, understands conflict in EVE. Kelduum does not.

Of course Mittens would. He did it with Prometheus. He did it with Darius III. Why wouldn't he marginalize someone who always brought bad ideas to the table? If the bad idea guy suddenly starts supporting your position, people will start wondering if, maybe, that too is a bad idea.

Keld, like a lot of people, has a lot of good ideas and a few bad ones. To use your logic, why would Mittens marginalize someone who brought lots of good ideas the table on the basis that he also had some (debatable) bad ones? You've had some pretty bad ideas in your time, Poetic, so I suppose you advise us all to ignore you also?

EVE Uni was never in any danger of ever being dissolved.

I suppose he has some good ideas concerning the corp interface ... but other than Kelduum and a few other CEOs of large corporations/alliances, who the hell gives a sh*t about the corp interface?

The other point the Circle of Seven are missing (The Mittani, Two Step, Selene, and other 0.0 candidates), is that Kelduum getting on the CSM will simply increase the ability of EVE University to recruit, which makes his position much stronger for CSM8. The more they coddle and support his run, the more in danger they put their positions for future CSMs.

He wants the CSM tag at his name to further the recruitment of EVE-U.

If he says EVE-U is a 100% legit organisation i challenge him to publish a full corp api key to proof this! if he does not comply we know he has something to hide and the "university" is not legit!

Vote for people like Issler Dainze (industrialists) Hans Jagerblitze/ Alkseyev Karrde. This are people who UNDERSTAND your issues far better then Kelduum probably ever will.

If he says EVE-U is a 100% legit organisation i challenge him to publish a full corp api key to proof this! if he does not comply we know he has something to hide and the "university" is not legit!

But if you consider the structure of Highsec, with lots of small/medium corps, you dont want to vote for him. He will support fixes for big corp issues (because that are the issues he notices everyday) and will be in favor of stuff that benefits HIS playstyle.

Is he the anti Mittani guy? hell no. He probably will either be marginalized by the 0.0 candidates, or they will use him for stuff they want to (corp/alliance interface).

Discussed and considered are two different things. It was discussed. Kelduum allowed it to be discussed. It was never something he considered. It wasn't something most of the directors considered. Silentbrick, giving up his fake admiralcy? *laugh* Kelduum giving up the biggest pulpit in highsec? You know how many newbs view him as a demigod? Keld would never give that up. Or how about Irdalth? Where else would he get to practice writing really sh*tty code and terribad user interfaces? (Hmm, there might be a job for him on the CCP UI team. )

They were just letting Darian vent. Because he's a good guy. EVE Uni was never in any danger of ever being dissolved.

[quote=Asuri Kinnes]You dip****! Keld was head diplo back then, It was Dee Carson and the person before him (forgive me, I've forgotten). Kelduum didn't *allow* anything!

And you did not adress the 2nd part of my question

[quote=Darian Reymont]Actually E-UNI came close to reverting back to a chat channel/forum structure last year.

We're talking about two different events, apparently, Asuri.

Anti E-Uni and Keld Rant.

able to keep cuddling new players who got bored of the game because they were picked on by the gods of players who are just too damn good to go fight amongst themselves and instead needed the challenge of picking on new players and griefing them.

You had me until right there...

/sigh....

Greifing is not allowed, and CCP doesn't define Griefing the same way other companies do. CCP *will* ban players for griefing - and has...

But dammit, get it out of your head that War = Griefing! It doesn't.

(besides, blowing **** up is fun...)

It's just legaleese.. Take can flipping. It's not allowed in a newbie system.. but 1 system over.. (where a new player will be going for sure) it's completely legitimate and allowed. personally.. as a new player I have no clue what 1 system is compared to the other really.. so to be can flipped but a character that's at least 1 year older then my toon.. I call that just as much griefing as if it was done in the starter system.

Kelduum is the worst candidate I have seen so far that has a chance of winning. Even for most of the High Sec anti PvP crowd he's terrible. Read his Wardec proposal in Features and Ideas if you doubt me. His idea creates a system where very large entities like EVE Uni effectively become immune to most wardecs, but all you smaller corps get nothing.. unless of course you give up your independence and join the likes of EVE Uni. don't vote for this guy.

...

Unless of course, you mean the small corps that are intent on picking on big corps filled with new players to pad their kill stats.

This is a thread for Kelduum to pitch his salespitch for running to CSM.

Really? Where is he?

Are you referring to EVE Uni? That large corp is more than 60% full of players six months old and older. Are they incapable of defending themselves from a small corp?

Do you know how ridiculous you sound? A small corp picking on a big corp? Jesus. Poor poor big corp, being picked on by a corp of 10 people. Get together all those carebear incursion runners who can afford l33t PvE ships to go bash down the small corp with some l33t PvP ships. Instead, they cry? WTF! Seriously.

Are you referring to EVE Uni? That large corp is more than 60% full of players six months old and older.

Sorry you don't dictate what people can and cannot post on the forums. Can't say I blame your mother, I'm sure she told you to "STFU" quite often.

Anyway, people can judge for themselves, being informed about candidates is important. Here's Kelduum's Wardec proposal: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67445 . If you think that's a great idea, then by all means vote for him.

Oh cool, it's this again.

Wasn't your original claim that the majority of students were over a year old? What happened to the proof you said you had about that and why the revised number? Because it sounds more plausible?