Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:It is the pervasiveness of {Goons} that troubles me. Largest alliance, so they have big swing in the game. CSM swing, so they "speak for us" then they are in the company so they have control of the game swing.
Doesn't this bother anyone else? People get fired and disbarred as lawyers for conflicts of interest like this.
Further, someone in game mentioned that too many with one mind set can imbalance a game and ruin it. I hope that isn't happening.
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Ladie Scarlet wrote: I've seen a lot of people try to explain Goons. None of them have ever been as wrong as you.
Beware the force of perception. Do you deny that the game has a heavy slant to push people into null sec? Why are they wanting to nerf ABC ores? Isn't the choice to stay in WHs and avoid null sec a prerogative of the customer? Have to be careful when taking away options. Getting late here but I am sure you can all find ways that the game pushes and keeps trying to push people into null sec. Someone was suggesting the other day that null sec should be in the middle of space and the factions at each compass point.
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:The list of CSMs (I was told two have stepped down since the emergency meeting, anyone got confirmation? Hypothetical possibilityOn page 27What could have happened is Goons CEO "Get more people into null sec" Goon staff of CCP "We remove ore so they must come to null sec! CSM Goons back me up" Goons CSMs "There is much ore coming from WHs" Other CSMs "Lies!"
Ephemeron wrote:Well said
To try TL;DR this for others.
Big alliances electing CSMs run the risk of pushing the game to alliance and null sec, while constantly penalising PvE, WH and high sec players.
CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
159
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP want more players in 0.0.
0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money than high sec players. 0.0 players create the stories that drive EVE marketing. 0.0 is the defining difference between Eve Online and WOW in space.
Because 0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money into the game they care more about what happens than other groups. They will ensure CCP hears their voice. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:CCP want more players in 0.0.
0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money than high sec players. 0.0 players create the stories that drive EVE marketing. 0.0 is the defining difference between Eve Online and WOW in space.
Because 0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money into the game they care more about what happens than other groups. They will ensure CCP hears their voice. in the first reply and everything |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:CCP want more players in 0.0.
0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money than high sec players. 0.0 players create the stories that drive EVE marketing. 0.0 is the defining difference between Eve Online and WOW in space.
Because 0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money into the game they care more about what happens than other groups. They will ensure CCP hears their voice.
Richard Hammond II wrote:I can argue that my $15 ($30 actually) spends just like anyone else's and itll be spent elsewhere (An Im sure Im not the only one) when the Goons Destroy OUR game (Given they "dont want to destroy THE game, just YOURS") by making higsec unlivable.
I can argue that WH corporations invest as much time and energy. They have to fight off constant pirate invasions and scan for everything. they have to make and manage POS(es) I can argue that some of my friends invest more time and energy into their high sec characters than 0.0 people do. My one friend for example has been playing EVE for five years and makes 150M a day in high sec from PI, radar sites, ladar sites, mag sites and grav sites. He raids WHs from high sec and since they are predominantly C2 that means he will lose significantly if ABC ores were removed from C2 and C1 Think he is the only one playing like this? Think again.
Right, all that aside:
Want to go the way of the dying game fast?
At what point do you think that new players want to go out to 0.0 space? - Is it when they are incredibly frustrated from not being able to grow in high sec? - Is it when they can't afford to buy their capital ships when you ruin WHs?
You see if you ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die.
Side note
CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
159
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
I can argue that unless you have dealt with the logistics of fitting fleet ships for a 1000man alliance when the nearest market hub is 24 gates away while under constant encroachment by enemy roaming gangs, that you little about time and energy investment. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:I can argue that unless you have dealt with the logistics of fitting fleet ships for a 1000man alliance when the nearest market hub is 24 gates away while under constant encroachment by enemy roaming gangs, that you little about time and energy investment.
Learn to delegate {more} and exaggerate less. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 02:58:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: At what point do you think that new players want to go out to 0.0 space? - Is it when they are incredibly frustrated from not being able to grow in high sec? - Is it when they can't afford to buy their capital ships when you ruin WHs? .
It's not very difficult for newbies to get into low/null when they're determined to do so. I jumped into 0.0 within a month of chargen. A friend of mine was attacking ships in a rifter until a pirate corp scooped him up while he was still in trial. Deklein Coalition takes in thousands and thousands of newbies brought in from their "home" forum communities.
Hisec doesn't really protect newbies necessarily. Like you said, it protects 5-year veterans who want to make 150M ISK a day without risking anything or incurring cost.
|

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Throw newbies in at the deep end and to Sansha space with the ones that drown!
Basically.
Think how many steps CCP have taken to ensure that high sec is safer? Think how many newbies would hit a warp bubble, die and quit?
Not everyone goes at the same pace, leave options open. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Throw newbies in at the deep end and to Sansha space with the ones that drown!
Basically. Think how many steps CCP have taken to ensure that high sec is safer? Think how many newbies would hit a warp bubble, die and quit? Not everyone goes at the same pace, leave options open. Options for individual playstyle should be respected, but recognizing that EVE is a world driven by players' actions balanced against one another is paramount.
Should EVE have a place where newbies can get a handle of the game? Absolutely. Does it follow that that same place have a near-monopoly on low-end mineral mining, ice mining, T1 and T2 manufacturing, logistics, etc. due to its safety? Not really.
This is a separate issue from what we started with though (why CCP wants players in 0.0) which JitaAlt summed up quite well. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Does it follow that that same place have a near-monopoly on low-end mineral mining, ice mining, T1 and T2 manufacturing, logistics, etc. due to its safety? Not really. So you want to put the building blocks that would help them step into null sec beyond their reach?  CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Does it follow that that same place have a near-monopoly on low-end mineral mining, ice mining, T1 and T2 manufacturing, logistics, etc. due to its safety? Not really. So you want to put the building blocks that would help them step into null sec beyond their reach? 
 |

Digital Messiah
N7 Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
I doubt CCP soundwave is risking his means to stay afloat IRL for the whims of goons. Would you risk the job that pays your rent, utilities, and food bill, just to make a club your involved in happy.
This isn't fight club, THIS IS Ceeee Ceee Peeeeeeeeee. "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" |

Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Iure Divino
17
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
The reason the big powerblocs get their delegates in the CSM is because they are all organized behind their candidate(s). If other groups want delegates to represent them, then they just need to get the word out, get people to sign in the voting mechanism, whatever. It won't be as easy for Joe W-space to be elected as it would be for The Mittani, but it's certainly possible.
In short, all the problems you describe in the CSM can be alleviated with effort in (I hate this phrase) 'getting the vote out'. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
Digital Messiah wrote:I doubt CCP soundwave is risking .... Fair enough and let me be clear. I am not saying that Goons are messing with things and pulling puppet strings. I am suggesting there is a conflict of interest and that the possibility for abuse exists. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Cipher Jones
36
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:CCP want more players in 0.0.
0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money than high sec players. 0.0 players create the stories that drive EVE marketing. 0.0 is the defining difference between Eve Online and WOW in space.
Because 0.0 players invest more time/energy/real life money into the game they care more about what happens than other groups. They will ensure CCP hears their voice.
Conversely they RMT the most and bot the most, which costs CCP the most money.
Also, every previous QEN contradicts your statement.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
I can argue that my $15 ($30 actually) spends just like anyone else's and itll be spent elsewhere (An Im sure Im not the only one) when the Goons Destroy OUR game (Given they "dont want to destroy THE game, just YOURS") by making higsec unlivable. They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Harold Tuphlos
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Digital Messiah wrote:I doubt CCP soundwave is risking .... Fair enough and let me be clear. I am not saying that Goons are messing with things and pulling puppet strings. I am suggesting there is a conflict of interest and that the possibility for abuse exists. And this is Eve so that is good.... |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 03:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
Harold Tuphlos wrote:And this is Eve so that is good.... Explain? Sometimes it sounds better in your head than written down for others to read. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 04:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:I can argue that unless you have dealt with the logistics of fitting fleet ships for a 1000man alliance when the nearest market hub is 24 gates away while under constant encroachment by enemy roaming gangs, that you little about time and energy investment.
so u jump 10 JF from ur 0.0 station to lowsec bordering highsec, warp to gate, fill on stuff scout the lowsec gate then cyno back
hell ESCORT YOUR ****, u know, caps on standby, 100 or so battleships |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 04:23:00 -
[20] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:I can argue that unless you have dealt with the logistics of fitting fleet ships for a 1000man alliance when the nearest market hub is 24 gates away while under constant encroachment by enemy roaming gangs, that you little about time and energy investment. so u jump 10 JF from ur 0.0 station to lowsec bordering highsec, warp to gate, fill on stuff scout the lowsec gate then cyno back hell ESCORT YOUR ****, u know, caps on standby, 100 or so battleships lmao |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
14
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 05:05:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Think how many newbies would hit a warp bubble, die and quit?
Not everyone goes at the same pace, leave options open.
Pretty much none, if they were introduced to the mechanic properly (i.e. in their first day/week when they have little to lose). The problem is that highsec forms a false illusion of safety in people, who are then very unwilling to move into what they view as more dangerous space. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 05:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Think how many newbies would hit a warp bubble, die and quit?
Not everyone goes at the same pace, leave options open. Pretty much none, if they were introduced to the mechanic properly (i.e. in their first day/week when they have little to lose). The problem is that highsec forms a false illusion of safety in people, who are then very unwilling to move into what they view as more dangerous space.
running ppl on rails into 0.0 isnt what a sandbox is. You cant create a sandbox game then ***** when theyre not playing it right. there IS no right if its a true sandbox, which is what everyone calls this. If you start railing everyone alone level paths you lose the sandbox and turn it into something more akin to WoW. Where you can go where you want but if youve outlevelled an area youre not gonna profit by staying in there.
Please dont put WoW in my EVE. I like the flavor of my EVE as is.
They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Atlas.
61
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 05:24:00 -
[23] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Think how many newbies would hit a warp bubble, die and quit?
Not everyone goes at the same pace, leave options open. Pretty much none, if they were introduced to the mechanic properly (i.e. in their first day/week when they have little to lose). The problem is that highsec forms a false illusion of safety in people, who are then very unwilling to move into what they view as more dangerous space. agreed
It's a lot more painless to get into nullsec when you have nothing to lose, like when you're a newbie It's when you have lots of isk but no real 0.0 experience that stuff like this happens. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 06:49:00 -
[24] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:
running ppl on rails into 0.0 isnt what a sandbox is. You cant create a sandbox game then ***** when theyre not playing it right. there IS no right if its a true sandbox, which is what everyone calls this. If you start railing everyone alone level paths you lose the sandbox and turn it into something more akin to WoW. Where you can go where you want but if youve outlevelled an area youre not gonna profit by staying in there.
Please dont put WoW in my EVE. I like the flavor of my EVE as is.
C'est parfet! 
I doubt that I will ever bother with null sec. In another game I play (AO) there is a saying, "Fr00bs play the game. Sl00bs work it." I think that can apply to null sec vs WH / HS. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
159
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 06:49:00 -
[25] - Quote
The OP seems to believe the rights of high sec people are being trodden on by 0.0 alliances. To be blunt you have limited options:
1. Start your own alliance and evict some 0.0 members (can't beat em join em...) 2. Present yourself as a CSM candidate for 2012 and fight for the rights of H.S players in that medium 3. Use the advantages of High Sec to stifle 0.0 economies - Identify who your real trade partners are and only trade with High Sec dwellers. 4. Become a High Sec PVP corp and camp the pipes/gates/hubs frequently used by 0.0 alliances in High Sec. 5. Create threads bemoaning the bias exhibited by CCP toward 0.0 and comfort yourself with the warm arms of Cipher Jones embrace. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 06:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:The OP seems to believe the rights of high sec people are being trodden on by 0.0 alliances. To be blunt you have limited options:
1. Start your own alliance and evict some 0.0 members (can't beat em join em...) 2. Present yourself as a CSM candidate for 2012 and fight for the rights of H.S players in that medium 3. Use the advantages of High Sec to stifle 0.0 economies - Identify who your real trade partners are and only trade with High Sec dwellers. 4. Become a High Sec PVP corp and camp the pipes/gates/hubs frequently used by 0.0 alliances in High Sec. 5. Create threads bemoaning the bias exhibited by CCP toward 0.0 and comfort yourself with the warm arms of Cipher Jones embrace. I will have some option 2. and option 6.
6. Being that I shall make a HS/WH corp who will go out and kill red pirates where ever we can find them.
In the mean time, I will do some "bemoaning" and call it "campaigning" shall I?  CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
159
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 07:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
You can call pornography art. It doesn't make it any better. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 07:02:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:You can call pornography art. It doesn't make it any better.
... and yet ... there is a particular site that has daily updates, it is where the two meet and from a matter of option people will say that one is art and one is ****. I find it interesting how much opinions differ on that. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
159
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 07:09:00 -
[29] - Quote
I am willing to bet a significant amount of isk that if you pursue "option 6" you will find yourself holding "option 4" after 6 months. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 07:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:I am willing to bet a significant amount of isk that if you pursue "option 6" you will find yourself holding "option 4" after 6 months.
You are on. 
It will be mostly WH for ISK generation with roams into low and null sec depending on exits. So .... not going to be holding gates and going to keep security standing high. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |