| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.20 11:55:00 -
[181] - Quote
Delta Jax wrote:Haters, Can we get some luv in lowsec..
What love do you want? CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.20 23:59:00 -
[182] - Quote
Original post has been updated. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
209
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 00:30:00 -
[183] - Quote
Your paranoia has shifted from being amusing to being pants on head ********.
Eve is the most complex multi-player computer games created to date. The development of the Flying in Space aspects of the game need to be tested and need to be tested by developers who understand the implications of game mechanic alterations to game play. The best people to do this are players who have demonstrated over a long period of time their ability to play different aspects of the game at a high level.
These players have certain things in common: 1. They play regularly on the test server 2. They provide regular and direct feedback to CCP (not on the forums in the general discussion threads) about their playing experience 3. They do not challenge the corporate structure of CCP or make large accusations against CCP without large amounts of prior investigation.
Currently there are CCP employees who have played for numerous Alliances, rumours I have heard would suggest that: BOB (now Raiden), Goons, Evoke, DRF, Eve University, Cascade imminent, CVA, Atlas have all had players who have become employees of CCP.
In regards to your accusations of Goons attempting to rule the CSM for their own purposes: CSM 4 and CSM 5 largely ignored the development of 0.0 space. While you can claim that during this period Dominion was released that was a 0.0 centred expansion, it was sorely broken and has not added to that aspect of the game. Many 0.0 Alliances voiced their concerns that 0.0 was being neglected, block voting selected candidates into place to ensure that CSM 6 would not ignore 0.0. This was an initiative that goons took part in, an initiative that had and still has widespread support across the 0.0 spectrum.
Regarding your wormhole whine: In 2010 CCP nerfed the sites in over 60% of 0.0 space (the sanctum and haven nerf). Their logic was simply - lower quality space deserves lower quality resources and higher quality space deserves higher quality resources. CSM6 are simply saying lower quality wormhole space deserve lower quality resources than higher quality wormhole space.
|

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 01:28:00 -
[184] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote: 3. They do not challenge the corporate structure of CCP or make large accusations against CCP without large amounts of prior investigation.
I have done no such thing.
Jita Alt666 wrote: In regards to your accusations of Goons attempting to rule the CSM for their own purposes: CSM 4 and CSM 5 largely ignored the development of 0.0 space.
Then you should understand where I am coming from in lack of representation. I am pointing out not only the conflict of interest but the null sec majority.
Jita Alt666 wrote: Regarding your wormhole whine:
Mining already sucks. Higher classes get more ore and can sustain larger corps. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 01:35:00 -
[185] - Quote
Conflict of interest
A conflict of interest (COI) occurs when an individual or organization is involved in multiple interests, one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation for an act in the other.
Even the definition stressed that in italics! CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
151
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 01:41:00 -
[186] - Quote
Wow, this thread is still going? Come on, you are apparently freaking out over one tiny change to game mechanics. There are plenty of good things coming as well, you need to calm down. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 01:47:00 -
[187] - Quote
Two step wrote:Wow, this thread is still going? Come on, you are apparently freaking out over one tiny change to game mechanics. There are plenty of good things coming as well, you need to calm down.
I looked at your assumption. Gave a deep sigh and have gone to bed.
(We have statics to C3 and C4, so we won't be affected by this change but I can totally understand how it will royally mess with other miners) CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
223
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 01:52:00 -
[188] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote: 3. They do not challenge the corporate structure of CCP or make large accusations against CCP without large amounts of prior investigation.
I have done no such thing. Jita Alt666 wrote: In regards to your accusations of Goons attempting to rule the CSM for their own purposes: CSM 4 and CSM 5 largely ignored the development of 0.0 space.
Then you should understand where I am coming from in lack of representation. I am pointing out not only the conflict of interest but the null sec majority. Jita Alt666 wrote: Regarding your wormhole whine:
Mining already sucks. Higher classes get more ore and can sustain larger corps.
My goodness your reply is way off topic: 1. I never accused/implied/inferred that you were doing anything. I was simply pointing out that players who make the move from being solely players have things in common. The alliance they play for is not one of those things.
2. A group of players felt they were being under-represented in the game development process. They then used that same process to ensure that they got represented. How do you not understand that? And how can you argue for fair representation and not see their actions as identical to what you are attempting here?
3. Lower quality space lower resources. Higher quality space higher resources. What does this have to do with how boring mining is? We all know mining is terribly boring.
|

Jita Alt666
223
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 01:56:00 -
[189] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Two step wrote:Wow, this thread is still going? Come on, you are apparently freaking out over one tiny change to game mechanics. There are plenty of good things coming as well, you need to calm down. I looked at your assumption. Gave a deep sigh and have gone to bed. (We have statics to C3 and C4, so we won't be affected by this change but I can totally understand how it will royally mess with other miners)
Devils advocate: You have a personal interest in Wormhole Space. You are complaining about Wormhole Space being modified. You have been angling to attempt to change representation for Wormhole space based pilots. Any comment you make may be an attempt to manipulate the situation for personal gain. You have a conflict of interest. |

Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
113
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 07:05:00 -
[190] - Quote
The OP has created a conflict of interest by posting this thread. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 12:39:00 -
[191] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote: 3. Lower quality space lower resources. Higher quality space higher resources. What does this have to do with how boring mining is? We all know mining is terribly boring.
At least at the moment they have an ISK incentive.
If ABC ores are dropped entirely from worm holes, I would just stop mining. Make more off sleepers anyway. I doubt I am the only one that would stop. Basically, Hulks are used much less and probably would stop entirely. The risk vs gain of mining other ores in WHs just isn't there without ABC ores.
Checked the values of ores which have Zydrine in them? Good luck getting that without Crokite mining CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
28
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 18:51:00 -
[192] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Checked the values of ores which have Zydrine in them? Good luck getting that without Crokite mining
To expand on that, the C1 and C2 miners get less sites, less often, so they make the most of them and mine up most everything that is in them. I think you will find that most of the Crokite comes from there. CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
67
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 19:08:00 -
[193] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I also think that the CSM needs representation of other aspects of the game to prevent it being blinkered down as single alley, once you turn the behemoth that is CCP.
The current CSM is pretty 0.0 heavy but some of us are pretty knowledgeable about all aspects of EVE.
Also, go read this if you want to get a feel for my thoughts on current events.
Anyway, I just spotted this thread. Hi, how can I help?  Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. |

Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 19:17:00 -
[194] - Quote
Any word on the "BIG" Devblog |

Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
67
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 19:19:00 -
[195] - Quote
Salpun wrote:Any word on the "BIG" Devblog
Without breaking the sacred NDA, I will say that we were told the blog everyone is waiting on was going to be out... before now. Obviously they are having about 30-odd people look it over which is probably not the best idea. No, the CSM still hasn't seen a draft of it nor do we know exactly what it will say beyond a few specific issues. That is the part that worries me. The CSM was nearly unanimous in our meeting with Zulu on Friday to just "get the information out there, fluff it up later". Zulu should have just written up a few paragraphs to get the initial blah blah out of the way and then others could follow on with more detailed stuff. Now it looks like they are trying to overdo it or, even worse, the blog will be 500 words of, "Trust us, this is gonna be awesome."
I'm sure it'll be fine in the end, but this is getting... annoying.  Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 19:44:00 -
[196] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:I also think that the CSM needs representation of other aspects of the game to prevent it being blinkered down as single alley, once you turn the behemoth that is CCP. The current CSM is pretty 0.0 heavy but some of us are pretty knowledgeable about all aspects of EVE. For one thing, myself and Greyscale pretty much invented WH space.  Also, go read this if you want to get a feel for my thoughts on current events. Anyway, I just spotted this thread. Hi, how can I help? 
yeah I just wrote out a good post on that but the forum ate it... 
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Jita Alt666
227
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 20:49:00 -
[197] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote: 3. Lower quality space lower resources. Higher quality space higher resources. What does this have to do with how boring mining is? We all know mining is terribly boring.
At least at the moment they have an ISK incentive. If ABC ores are dropped entirely from worm holes, I would just stop mining. Make more off sleepers anyway. I doubt I am the only one that would stop. Basically, Hulks are used much less and probably would stop entirely. The risk vs gain of mining other ores in WHs just isn't there without ABC ores. Checked the values of ores which have Zydrine in them? Good luck getting that without Crokite mining
1. No one any where has said that ABCs are being dropped entirely from worm holes. 2. Minerals come from drone space. Seriously who mines anymore. Just compress in Jita and export. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
64
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 09:33:00 -
[198] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote: 2. Minerals come from drone space. Seriously who mines anymore. Just compress in Jita and export.
Stop supporting the ebil botting russian nulsec cheeterz!!!!
Sorry, sorry, I think I may be getting tinfoil poisoning.... o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
14
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 09:48:00 -
[199] - Quote
I have to say, my opinion on Goons has changed dramatically.
I have fought on both sides of many of the wars in Eve and have found one HUGE truth: 99% of Eve players are the same, 99% of propoganda about how the enemy are bad, idiots, terrible people or nerds is rubbish. If anything the most annoying and elitist people in game are the 'Elite pvp' guys who treat Eve as a job.
I used to believe Goons were out to wreck the game for everybody because this is the propoganda spread by alot of people. Yes they scam, lie, cheat and steal, but that is Eve. Only this year have I found myself allied to Goons and Test and the CF and I have to say I have never had so much fun in Eve, they play the game to have fun, to enjoy it and it turns out all my preconceptions were wrong. This coalition is not only the strongest I have been in but the most enjoyable.
I also think that as a general rule what the current CSM and Mittani want is actually a BETTER game, not one that favours any particular faction.
LIke I said, this view is from someone who has been on most sides at one time or another in Hisec, Lowsec and Null life.
I see absolutely NO conflict of interest that wouldnt come from any other CSM member or CCP staff that also play the game, no matter what faction they come from. |

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Fatal Ascension
64
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 10:04:00 -
[200] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:I have to say, my opinion on Goons has changed dramatically.
I have fought on both sides of many of the wars in Eve and have found one HUGE truth: 99% of Eve players are the same, 99% of propoganda about how the enemy are bad, idiots, terrible people or nerds is rubbish. If anything the most annoying and elitist people in game are the 'Elite pvp' guys who treat Eve as a job.
I used to believe Goons were out to wreck the game for everybody because this is the propoganda spread by alot of people. Yes they scam, lie, cheat and steal, but that is Eve. Only this year have I found myself allied to Goons and Test and the CF and I have to say I have never had so much fun in Eve, they play the game to have fun, to enjoy it and it turns out all my preconceptions were wrong. This coalition is not only the strongest I have been in but the most enjoyable.
I also think that as a general rule what the current CSM and Mittani want is actually a BETTER game, not one that favours any particular faction.
LIke I said, this view is from someone who has been on most sides at one time or another in Hisec, Lowsec and Null life.
I see absolutely NO conflict of interest that wouldnt come from any other CSM member or CCP staff that also play the game, no matter what faction they come from. Everything in this is true, with the added feeling that if CCP employees DON'T play the game, then they aren't qualified to work on it. Everything about Incarna proved that. CCP employees should play the game, and be monitored(just like CSM and ISD are) on their in-game, and out of game, accounts. Blizzard does this with their employees(the IA team there scours 3rd party sites as well as everything run by Blizz for any sign of a break) and people do get fired for mentioning to the wrong person where they work, much less talking about any inside info on the game.
Just have a good IA dept, thats not retardedly overdone so employees fear playing the game, and it is all good. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
266
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 10:53:00 -
[201] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote: 3. Lower quality space lower resources. Higher quality space higher resources. What does this have to do with how boring mining is? We all know mining is terribly boring.
At least at the moment they have an ISK incentive. If ABC ores are dropped entirely from worm holes, I would just stop mining. Make more off sleepers anyway. I doubt I am the only one that would stop. Basically, Hulks are used much less and probably would stop entirely. The risk vs gain of mining other ores in WHs just isn't there without ABC ores. Checked the values of ores which have Zydrine in them? Good luck getting that without Crokite mining 1. No one any where has said that ABCs are being dropped entirely from worm holes. 2. Minerals come from drone space. Seriously who mines anymore. Just compress in Jita and export.
In fact no one has said anywhere that they're being dropped from any Wormholes.. Of course facts don't matter to people who just want to sieze on something - anything - to yell at the CSM about. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Jenshae Chiroptera
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 09:04:00 -
[202] - Quote
(Have been working in RL a lot lately, so I will go back and read the latest posts, then reply to them at a later stage.)
Jenshae Chiroptera > Ice is going to be null sec only soon Friend > nah they cant do that too many people with hi sec pos's will complain Jenshae Chiroptera > They also want to remove ABC ore from POS from C1 and C2 Friend > the thing is that would effectivaly kill off half of the playerbase becuase most corps have hi sec and low sec pos's and people wont move to 0.0 Friend > ok, so oif they do that, they should effectivly put ice in wh's Jenshae Chiroptera > Nope. They are trying to push more people out to null sec Friend > wont work people will just quit they tried that one a few years ago, it failed Friend > they changed the whole sov mechanic hoping it would encourage smaller alliances to settle in 0.0 Friend > problem was it basically bankrupted the smaller ones becuase the cost is astronomical Jenshae Chiroptera > Null sec is too small Friend > null sec is boring same old crap every day Jenshae Chiroptera > If it was huge, people could covert a cyno ship in, then build a base quietly in someone's back yard. Especially if it worked like WH space Friend > why you think smaller alliances rent space from the big one? Jenshae Chiroptera > They rent space because they can't defend themselves? Friend > they rent it so the big alliance can pay their bill thats how it really works, the big alliance depends on the renters to cover the cost Jenshae Chiroptera > Interesting. I thought they wouldn't want an alliance growing in their territory Friend > theres more to this wormhole ore business than meets the eye. the reason goons dont want people in wh's is becuase theres no sov. wormholes are cheap 0.0 basically Friend > i reckon more people are considering wormholes and the alarm bells are ringing becuase theres less people to defend their space, thats my impression Friend > the amount of ore in a wh wont affect the amount in 0.0 Friend > so ccp is trying to force people into something that will effectively kill the game CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Jita Alt666
268
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:01:00 -
[203] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:(Have been working in RL a lot lately, so I will go back and read the latest posts, then reply to them at a later stage.)
Jenshae Chiroptera > Ice is going to be null sec only soon Friend > nah they cant do that too many people with hi sec pos's will complain Jenshae Chiroptera > They also want to remove ABC ore from POS from C1 and C2 Friend > the thing is that would effectivaly kill off half of the playerbase becuase most corps have hi sec and low sec pos's and people wont move to 0.0 Friend > ok, so oif they do that, they should effectivly put ice in wh's Jenshae Chiroptera > Nope. They are trying to push more people out to null sec Friend > wont work. people will just quit. they tried that one a few years ago, it failed Friend > they changed the whole sov mechanic hoping it would encourage smaller alliances to settle in 0.0 Friend > problem was it basically bankrupted the smaller ones becuase the cost is astronomical Jenshae Chiroptera > Null sec is too small Friend > null sec is boring same old crap every day Jenshae Chiroptera > If it was huge, people could covert a cyno ship in, then build a base quietly in someone's back yard. Especially if it worked like WH space Friend > why you think smaller alliances rent space from the big one? Jenshae Chiroptera > They rent space because they can't defend themselves? Friend > they rent it so the big alliance can pay their bill thats how it really works, the big alliance depends on the renters to cover the cost Jenshae Chiroptera > Interesting. I thought they wouldn't want an alliance growing in their territory Friend > theres more to this wormhole ore business than meets the eye. the reason goons dont want people in wh's is becuase theres no sov. wormholes are cheap 0.0 basically Friend > i reckon more people are considering wormholes and the alarm bells are ringing becuase theres less people to defend their space, thats my impression Friend > the amount of ore in a wh wont affect the amount in 0.0 Friend > so ccp is trying to force people into something that will effectively kill the game
Why link a random log of you and a random person talking about things that no one has said apart from yourself?
|

Jenshae Chiroptera
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:35:00 -
[204] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Why link a random log of you and a random person talking about things that no one has said apart from yourself?
Page 27
"CCP talked about removing ABC (Arkonor, Bistot and Crokite) mining sites from wormhole space at some point in the future. This may be from all wormholes, or possibly from lower class wormholes only. It was claimed by some members of the CSM that a large fraction of the high end ore supply is produced through these sites, however the CSMs who were active in wormholes would not accept this claim without hard data to back it up."
I forget where I saw the proposed ice changes, so tougher to find the link for that.
CSM - Do you think? You see if they ruin high sec and WHs, you are ripping the newbie uterus out of EVE and feeding it to the big alliances. When it is gone, they will starve and die. |

Magnus Orin
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:44:00 -
[205] - Quote
Lowsec and 0.0 are the real Eve. Highsec is really just an extended tutorial zone.
Look at any Eve promo video/trailer. Which sections of space, and what type of gameplay do they promote the most?
it should be difficult to make any isk at all in high sec, outside of trading.
In my opinion, all major resource sources in this game, should come from outside of high sec.
Mission running has no place in Eve, and should be phased out. Except missions in lowsec/null.
If you want to do PVE, do incursions or wormholes.
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
41
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 20:57:00 -
[206] - Quote
Quote:The bottom line is that the more information the CSM has, the better advices it can give to CCP.
I might start with the same old tired requests that the community presents every damn year. CSM, **** you and your wh minerals... there I said it.
The CSM is sitting there at a table with CCP suggesting that they overhaul the wrong game elements.
Quote:Zulu said CSM could have a selection of the Little Things backlog, and Soundwave wants the CSM to give him a GÇÿtop 10GÇÖ list drawn from it GÇô i.e. to have the CSM prioritize the items so BFF can get a better feel for what is important to players.
Maybe you should post a thread about this little part, ya know so we know that your not just pulling out of your ass as usual. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
41
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 21:05:00 -
[207] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
In fact no one has said anywhere that they're being dropped from any Wormholes.. Of course facts don't matter to people who just want to sieze on something - anything - to yell at the CSM about.
And yet it is on the table and being discussed... Ya know, instead of important things.
No one can tell me, you or anyone else how a WH mineral nerf will (noticeably) better industry in Empire or null sec. Go ahead CSM, I dare you to explain it in this thread. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
75
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 21:10:00 -
[208] - Quote
lol you'll believe anything that gets you riled up and frothing at the mouth because goons
removing ice from high-sec wouldn't affect anyone in high-sec anywhere as much as null-sec residents who need the ice products and cba to mine ice (mining enough ice to fuel all of our towers would be a nightmare) |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
275
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 22:38:00 -
[209] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Malcanis wrote:
In fact no one has said anywhere that they're being dropped from any Wormholes.. Of course facts don't matter to people who just want to sieze on something - anything - to yell at the CSM about.
And yet it is on the table and being discussed... Ya know, instead of important things. No one can tell me, you or anyone else how a WH mineral nerf will (noticeably) better industry in Empire or null sec. Go ahead CSM, I dare you to explain it in this thread.
It's being "discussed", after the CSM explicitly said that they'd be devoting exactly 0% of their time to the issue, only because you keep bringing it up. It's not happening instead of "important things" because no-one involved with "important things" is in any way interested in it. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
36
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 22:44:00 -
[210] - Quote
Quote: CSM - Do you think? (... continued)
No...no they do not. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |