]Please please please CCP allow players with 5.0 SS to engage first players with negative SS without retalation of Concord or standing loss.

...
Please please please CCP allow players with 5.0 SS to engage first players with negative SS without retalation of Concord or standing loss.
Allow justicars to exist.
We could clean the whole universe and no kids would be spamming my local anymore.

Post Scriptum:
SS 4.5+ : can attack any players with negative SS without concord retaliation or standing loss. All others rule apply.
SS 3+ : can attack players with a bounty on their head.

PVP everywhere and for everyone.
Too bad all the badass pirates roaming in hi-sec won't agree to be targeted by anything but a miner.

Then OK to remove warp to zero.

1. Gate-camping would be even more effective. <- thats a bad thing
2. Easier to patrol your claimed territor because you can catch intruders more easily <- meh
3. Hi-sec War declarations would be more fun and effective because you have more opprotunity to 'catch' your enemies<- that is a bad thing
4. Hi-sec suicide ganking would be more common<- that is a bad thing
5. It would multiple the advantage of smaller faster ships as more useful than larger ships.<- i guess that is good but it would simply mean there would be 1-2 interceptors in every camp to simple web the hell out of anyone till someone else could lock and kill it
6. Other.

Post alternative, reasoning below.

1. Gate-camping would be even more effective.
2. Easier to patrol your claimed territor because you can catch intruders more easily
5. It would multiple the advantage of smaller faster ships as more useful than larger ships.

warp to 0 was implemented because everyone made bookmarks on gates... to save database space from he 2000 bookmarks on gates they added warp to 0
hopefully its here to stay It would only hurt the game to remove it

How about disabling WTZ just for null-sec? High-sec has WTZ because the Factions want to encourage trade and have advanced "warp beacons" on the games to make travel (i.e. trade) easier. Null either doesn't have those "warp beacons", or could pay to upgrade their stargates with beacons, or they can program their WTZ beacons to only work for those with friendly standings.


/pre-emptive apology if someone has already suggested this, since I couldn't be bothered to read the previous six pages of posts that are sure to contain a large amount of whining, baiting, and noise in general.

Also, +1 for the "like one of two posts" poll format. Kudos.

you want to make the gay gate camps even gayer?

These are basically convience and anti-pvp reasons.

How about keep it as it is.

Seem to remember there was no warp to 0 around 2005. 30 jumps back then was a far more boring that it is today when you're not afk.

Although I was out of the game at the time warp to 0 was introduced I believe it was introduced to reduce lag, at least that's what I heard.

Supported!

I want to get rid of warp...

warp out in combat - stupid, only in non combat it should work.

stupid as scroll of escape, magic teleport etc.

1a. Gate-camping would be even more effective fool-proofed.
2a. Easier to patrol your claimed territory because you can catch intruders more easily when you just can't be arsed to drop/anchor a bubble or bother with having the pesky mail-whoring interceptors along!
3a. Hi-sec War declarations would be more fun and effective because you have more opprotunity to 'catch' your enemies for the griefing party as he guarantees the mark stays docked and thus doesn't get to play Eve.
4a. Hi-sec suicide ganking would be more common omnipresent.
5a. It would multiple the advantage of smaller faster ships as more useful than larger ships along with prayers that the enemy hasn't figured out how to use remote-/-SeBo's.

1b. Travel times would be longer. Much, much longer in larger ships.
2b. Hi-sec suicide ganking would be easier and more common so easy that drunk ******** chimps distracted by a banana could do it..
3b. Breaking through low sec and null sec gate camps would be harder nigh impossible.
4b. Avoiding warring oponents would be harder require you to spend the week in WoT.


Yes, the whole idea is indeed a lazy mans wish for killboard padding as Eve becomes a never ending series of ganks at celestial's.

It was, is and will always be a horrid idea.

lol 7 votes yes vs 88 votes no

I guess eve posters could decipher your posts alright