| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Louis deGuerre
The Dark Tribe
Against ALL Authorities
221
   |
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:01:00 -
[91] - Quote
Lol Inferno
Just one thing I really want to see happen:
A meaningful bounty system
There will be cake if you build it ! 
FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES ! |
Pihls XIIX
Persia Capital Investments Group
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:10:00 -
[92] - Quote
I want WiS 'Walk in stations'
I been playing eve and beta testing eve online. even at that stage it was talk
about 3D chars and be able to walk in stations by dev /ccp.
I been around from the start I been doing 'pew pew' also called pvp.
being mining industrial running poses been in 00 space 'been doing Ps' been doing all yo can do
in eve
I been promoting eve online as the best mmorpg out there best pvp best mmorpg corp
and well dragged people in eve online from the start.
after being in eve from the start Walk in stations was the thing that would inspire me to continue playing eve
set upp my own bar, shop having npc merchants be able to get my self a nice looking
office for my corp.
Now those I promoted eve over the years are now leaving eve ...
they are those people that build your pew pew ships those who you say go f'''' when they say
they want WiS.
They are those people that are mining soo its minerals to build your ships for your pew pew ships
all from frigates to capital ships.
Before in eve it wasnt soo you could open the market to buy a ship becouse no one was there to build it
as the market are player driven also ships producing are player driven.
So when you tell those who wanted WiS go f '' you are then ruin your pvp pew pew game
becouse in eve all the ships are player build not by pew pew people without us
yo maybe need to ask ccp to start build your ships ??
side note:
10 accounts from the start are around 150 euro each month and 1800 euro a year.
Thats around in total 18000 euro I paid from start to this day ccp
Even if they say in the text they can alter what ever in the game.
Soo conclusion is you cant trust ccp in anything so why listen/read bloggs?
Think it's not illegal yet.
|
Charait
Red South Fantoms
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:14:00 -
[93] - Quote
WIS must come with ability to kill other ppl other than that what the point?! Intrigue and disguise and poison - that what I want from WIS! |
Bubanni
SniggWaffe
EVE Corporation 123566322353
87
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:28:00 -
[94] - Quote
I LOVE YOU CCP! I am considering getting a EVE tattoo in the future :3 |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
225
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:36:00 -
[95] - Quote
I'd never, in 3+ years of playing and loving EVE, thought I'd go here, but:
If you nerf the Drake, then I, and many others I know will likely un-sub.
Darius III calls it bang-on when he says it's an abomination, and completely un-necessary.
Fix what needs fixing by fixing it, not nerf what works to make what's broken look better.
I are kyute kitten!
I are in ur mishun!
Redoosin' teh lag by ninja'ing ur wrekz!
(CCP: Make wrecks probable, and after 30min., tractorable.) |
Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:44:00 -
[96] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
If you nerf the Drake, then I, and many others I know will likely un-sub.
Their explanation for wanting to change it made sense though.
saying your going to quit because they are wanting to change ONE ship without any sound explantion discredits yourself and just makes you look like a fool |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
225
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:47:00 -
[97] - Quote
Tyme Xandr wrote:
[...]
...the exploration boat in the Echelon, the wormholes where u have safer nullsec ores and sleepers to kill and harvest for production.
[...]
Wait, what??!
[facepalm]
Not sure if troll? Have you ever actually been in a wormhole? Get your big ole' Hulk into one (Class 2+ only, c1s' mass-limits prevent a Hulk going through, IIRC), start mining out those constantly re-spawning (NOT!!) huge (ditto) A/B/C/O belts, and tell me how long you go before you get it urp-sploded--no, it won't tank Sleepers, and those aren't even the primary danger in worm-space--then tell me how "safe" it is.
[/facepalm]
I are kyute kitten!
I are in ur mishun!
Redoosin' teh lag by ninja'ing ur wrekz!
(CCP: Make wrecks probable, and after 30min., tractorable.) |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
225
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:58:00 -
[98] - Quote
Sade Onyx wrote:Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
If you nerf the Drake, then I, and many others I know will likely un-sub.
Their explanation for wanting to change it made sense though. saying your going to quit because they are wanting to change ONE ship without any sound explantion discredits yourself and just makes you look like a fool
I have explained extensively why the Drake does not need nerfing elsewhere. (Different character, but that one's....been assessed an infraction ...for swearing at a goon-troll.)
TL/DR:
It does nothing outstandingly well except for tanking. Bricking it up will gimp it in most every other aspect, thus balancing the tank.
It needs that tanking ability to mitigate incoming damage due to its battleship-size base signature radius (and capital-ship size sig-radius under MWD) and the fact that it's not too fast even nano'ed.
It's only real DPS is with Kinetic damage. Switch out, and lose 30% of your DPS, which is, with HMs, at best "middle of the road," and delayed in arriving on target.
The proposed change will just turn it into another piece of **** Caracal or Raven--two ships that don't really to anything well, except torp-gank in the Raven's case, which the Typhoon does better whilst retaining greater versatility, being faster, smaller sig, and much more EHP.
This will turnm one of the best-designed ships in the game into just another one-dimensional cookie-cutter gank-platform, and screw over who knows how many newer players who lose the use of it as a "starter real-money-maker" ship.
No:
It is an abomination, and that's all there is to it.
I are kyute kitten!
I are in ur mishun!
Redoosin' teh lag by ninja'ing ur wrekz!
(CCP: Make wrecks probable, and after 30min., tractorable.) |
Cailais
Rekall Incorporated
209
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 00:09:00 -
[99] - Quote
Looking forward to reading the detail on this.
Nice wallpaper too 
C. |
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 00:22:00 -
[100] - Quote
i liked the part about concord sanctioned warfare... does this mean the introduction of a dueling system!??!? |
|
|
Vrykolakasis
Trinity Operations
Aurora Irae
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 00:39:00 -
[101] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:i liked the part about concord sanctioned warfare... does this mean the introduction of a dueling system!??!?
Yes please. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power.
Cascade Imminent
410
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 00:39:00 -
[102] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:What are indies complaining about. I make a ton of isk on my indy alt doing t2 invention and other t1 production. it isnt on life support you are doing it wrong.
Also rule of acquisition #34.
War is good for profit. That is THE problem. Industry in EVE fall to the lowest branches of the EVE tree - profession for alts only.
ban npc corps
|
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
532
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 00:44:00 -
[103] - Quote
Here's hoping this doesn't "fix" FW and wardecs the same way Dominion "fixed" sov warfare. Looking forward to it!
Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers. US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join us. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. |
Tyme Xandr
State Protectorate
Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 01:09:00 -
[104] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Tyme Xandr wrote:
[...]
...the exploration boat in the Echelon, the wormholes where u have safer nullsec ores and sleepers to kill and harvest for production.
[...]
Wait, what??![facepalm] Not sure if troll? Have you ever actually been in a wormhole? Get your big ole' Hulk into one (Class 2+ only, c1s' mass-limits prevent a Hulk going through, IIRC), start mining out those constantly re-spawning (NOT!!) huge (ditto) A/B/C/O belts, and tell me how long you go before you get it urp-sploded--no, it won't tank Sleepers, and those aren't even the primary danger in worm-space--then tell me how "safe" it is. [/facepalm] E: Oh, and the Echelon is a novelty-ship, not an exploration-ship. We still don't have one of the latter, although it's arguably needed.
I lived in a wormhole. You EVE new players need to stop thinking EVE is a solo game. I gas mined and ABC mined in wormholes and its a team effort. Someone to kill the first and second set of sleepers in a grav site (afterwards they dont respawn). In a C2 WH you can kill them in an AF.
Risk comes reward. All you Indy players who want to sit in hi-sec cant complain about mining 'sucking'. Enjoy your veldspar. |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex
Cosmic Consortium
969
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 01:45:00 -
[105] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:There is a dev blog coming tomorrow that touches on the future of avatar based gameplay, and we would appreciate a re-post of your questions tomorrow in that thread
I'm looking forward to this one. Pom-poms are armed and ready.
|
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 01:52:00 -
[106] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:CCP Unifex wrote:A lot of work was put into YourEVE by everyone at CCP over the last few months Quick question - what is "YourEVE" ? Did I miss a feature somewhere, or is this another buzzword along the lines of "EvE is Real"....
maybe he meant you're eve as in you are eve... so in a way he was being funny...
|
MeBiatch
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
182
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 01:57:00 -
[107] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:There is a dev blog coming tomorrow that touches on the future of avatar based gameplay, and we would appreciate a re-post of your questions tomorrow in that thread
i like this buzz word avatar based gameplay... much better then the hated word incarna and ambulation...
sounds like something i could get behind... |
Reyona
Nordic Innovations
BLACK-MARK
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 02:06:00 -
[108] - Quote
Is Inferno the best name for the expansion? It doesn't fit the "war" theme all that well. |
Tyme Xandr
State Protectorate
Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 02:15:00 -
[109] - Quote
Reyona wrote:Is Inferno the best name for the expansion? It doesn't fit the "war" theme all that well.
Maybe it fits the theme of the forum being set ablaze by whiny complainy people who were mad over a insider newsletter that displayed two sides of an argument - people who swore that one side was how it was going to be and the other side ceased to exist after reading the one they did not like.
After that event the focus on just FiS is full sail ahead under the tagline Inferno. |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation
RONA Directorate
763
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 03:39:00 -
[110] - Quote
WTF is a drake, i prefer a nighthawk myself.
// obvious troll.
Seriously nefing the drake will do nothing big you will get a ton of whining but the smart players adapt. the stupid ones quit. |
|
|
Zorok
LEGI0N
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 04:09:00 -
[111] - Quote
Do you know if the sensor dampener finally get a much-needed boost in this upcoming expansion? As it stands, the dampeners, even on specialized ships are somewhat limited and some ships have such far-out sensor ranges like the T3s fit with the probe boost sub for example (without sensor boosters) that damps are practically useless against them for any sort of medium range combat. |
Flamespar
Woof Club
277
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 04:27:00 -
[112] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:There is a dev blog coming tomorrow that touches on the future of avatar based gameplay, and we would appreciate a re-post of your questions tomorrow in that thread
Hopefully it contains specific information. Rather than the usual 'we will deliver something at sometime and it will be amazing but we aren't going to give you specific details' rhetoric.
I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Zouyu Sykee
Viking Tech Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 04:32:00 -
[113] - Quote
Huzzah! |
Red Teufel
Blackened Skies
THE UNTHINKABLES
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 05:23:00 -
[114] - Quote
tease me some more. It feels good. |
Charles Javeroux
INTERSTELLAR CREDIT
Interstellar Trade Syndicate
14
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 06:40:00 -
[115] - Quote
YAY \o/ Good stuff!!! EVE industry moguls are waiting eagerly for new ways to exploit and profit. Keep em comin.... |
Shadowsword
The Scope
Gallente Federation
116
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 06:56:00 -
[116] - Quote
Inferno, not a bad name.
This expansion better bring many new things to skill for, it's been ages since I don't know what to do with my SP. |
Endeavour Starfleet
652
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 07:13:00 -
[117] - Quote
I like the name.
I would like to make a few comments tho. Of course in anticipation of much more info going into March.
Quote:The next few months will be spent reinvigorating Concord-sanctioned warfare, giving tools and a framework to groups who wish to take advantage of these conflicts both directly and indirectly.
PLEASE give this one A GREAT deal of time for discussion, testing, and implementation. The last thing we need is a return to the bad old days of decing every 5 man corp out there because said PvPers cant hack it in nullsec. Invulnerable POS is an issue but so say one very large alliance wanting to cause chaos by bringing its members into hisec jump clones for a few days of total POS destruction and Jita camping. Nobody is going to come to the aid of a 15 character POS against a blob.
Quote:Factional Warfare will also be seeing changes to make it much more relevant and fun by giving real reasons to fight for your faction.
I am very happy to hear of this. The potential for FW to be a true alternative to nullsec sov warfare is there just needs the proper attention in my opinion.
Obviously the blog is a tease. But I hope there will be other badly needed changes as well. If a full modular POS and Corp revamp is not in the cards http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Possibly_Practical_POS_Performance_Proposal_%28CSM%29 (For reference) PLEASE atleast try to implement personal divisions on POS hangars and arrays so that smaller corps can isolate potential spies without removing valuable members or potential for newer players to experience group play. |
Jazzmyn
The Ghost Division
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 08:50:00 -
[118] - Quote
So what are u going to do about the WiS?
I have to say i was quite exited about walking in stations, and its shame to see u have completely abandoned it.
Changes into avatar system were realy nice, but i kinda expected alot more from WiS than what it currently is. Have courage to finish what u started ! Pretty please.  |
Grey Stormshadow
draketrain
Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
940
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 08:58:00 -
[119] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:CCP Guard wrote:There is a dev blog coming tomorrow that touches on the future of avatar based gameplay, and we would appreciate a re-post of your questions tomorrow in that thread i like this buzz word avatar based gameplay... much better then the hated word incarna and ambulation... sounds like something i could get behind...
There was nothing wrong in Incarna as it was demoed in playable form back in year one and two. Problems started when the entire project got binned and started from scratch again. The junk what we have now is end product of this brilliant decision.
Get |
Sturmwolke
137
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 09:11:00 -
[120] - Quote
Any change to intel gathering tools (especially for highsec wars) slated for Inferno?
Locator agents very crude. At the moment, locating assets and and areas of operation usually entails hours if not weeks of work to unravel the complete webwork . Massively time consuming.
I wouldn't mind a sort of an NPC FBI/CIA org (just like Concord) that caters for these things.
It has the potential to be a good isk sink. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |