| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lumen Atra
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2008.06.14 14:43:00 -
[241]
 Originally by: Lady Valory
First, they got organized and moved 20 of their 180 person blob into ospreys.
2nd they formed a caracal gang of 40 caracals.
The remaining ships were just the same rag tag militia.
Quote:
the Russians didn't have a fleet OR more than one pos gunner.
Quote:
stunning
Morons.
|
Tomoko Ken
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:03:00 -
[242]
Edited by: Tomoko Ken on 14/06/2008 15:13:36
First of all... Tama != Black Rise
That tower was probably there long before FW.
Secondly:
Do you honestly think you'll accomplish anything but losing a lot of ships trying to be on the offensive against alliance POSes in any of the FW enabled regions?
Haven't you forgotten something? Like the Gallente faction gang that will be waiting to jump you at most of those POS assaults. Along with the owners of the POS of course.
Oh yes. Great idea... |
Aaron Mirrorsaver
R.E.C.O.N.
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:28:00 -
[243]
hey lady, dont stop there, kill all the valuable moons in low sec you can :)
make the 0.0 alliances forced to defend them.
C.E.O.
Go Hard, or go Home.
|
Splagada
Tides of Silence
Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:33:00 -
[244]
theres promethium in Tama??
------
Tides of Silence |
Tappits
Priory Of The Lemon
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:35:00 -
[245]
Originally by: Esmenet
Well if you manage to look past RA and whatever they do the militia have the possibility to attack any alliance core isk generating areas while keeping their own isk generating areas 100% safe thanks to game mechanics.
The mechanics are fine considering militia vs militia fights but the second the militia starts attacking alliance space that balance is shifted. I doubt it will be any kind of real problem but the potential is there.
i think it will be a fun day when the militia start takeing 0.0 systems of there own.
i dont see any bad points to them doing it. there free to do as thay like just like you.
|
Tappits
Priory Of The Lemon
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:38:00 -
[246]
Originally by: Lumen Atra
Quote:
the Russians didn't have a fleet OR more than one pos gunner.
Morons.
what all he said is thay did not have a fleet or more than one pos gunner there to defend? how can he be a moron when what he said was the truth?
goons do realy need to think before posting
|
bestsnail
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:45:00 -
[247]
Man you guys act like caldari militia are in the wrong when it is really RAs fault for putting a tower on a State moon.
|
th1rdeye
PROGENITOR CORPORATION
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:47:00 -
[248]
Originally by: Tappits
Originally by: Lumen Atra
Quote:
the Russians didn't have a fleet OR more than one pos gunner.
Morons.
what all he said is thay did not have a fleet or more than one pos gunner there to defend? how can he be a moron when what he said was the truth?
goons do realy need to think before posting
He was pointing out that a 180 man blob put a tower into reinforced when it was defended by only 1 gunner and no fleet, yet the Caldari militia are celecrating as if they just blew up the death star over Endor.
RK guys really should think before they post, and then refrain from doing it.
|
soldieroffortune 258
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:48:00 -
[249]
Edited by: soldieroffortune 258 on 14/06/2008 15:56:29
Originally by: Kaishain
So the militia is engaging in normal conflicts but have the luxury of not being able to get wardecced?
How can non-FW corps and alliances retaliate when militias decides to screw with their business?
oi to this, the alliance can defend itself, no? i agree, it is wrong for the FW people to be attacking RA, its like waving FW in their face saying haha you cant do what we are doing, or something like that.
i personally think RA should drop a fleet of capital ships on a Caldari fleet though (just once, to blow them out of the water and send them the message, "we will not be f'ed with"), its wrong for FW people trying to get an alliance involved in something they dont have access to, the RA and Gallente militia need to make a plan on this, next time a Caldari Militia attacks an asset of the RA, they warp in a few ships and hold the Caldari down so they cant escape, then tip it off to a gallente fleet and just wait, then watch the turkey shoot
|
bestsnail
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:52:00 -
[250]
Originally by: th1rdeye
Originally by: Tappits
Originally by: Lumen Atra
Quote:
the Russians didn't have a fleet OR more than one pos gunner.
Morons.
what all he said is thay did not have a fleet or more than one pos gunner there to defend? how can he be a moron when what he said was the truth?
goons do realy need to think before posting
He was pointing out that a 180 man blob put a tower into reinforced when it was defended by only 1 gunner and no fleet, yet the Caldari militia are celecrating as if they just blew up the death star over Endor.
RK guys really should think before they post, and then refrain from doing it.
well there were ewoks dancing in the state protectorate stations after the tower went into reinforced :)
|
|
|
soldieroffortune 258
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 15:55:00 -
[251]
Originally by: Sabreana
This is a real easy problem for ccp to solve. Allow any player based alliance to wardec a faction in this case the caldari state, and the RA Boys and Girls loose the free ride of safety in Caldari Hi-Sec space just as faction wars was designed. Thou since its all low sec anyways its still open warfare regardless of faction so its open season on what ever fies. RA will just have to move assets to deal with it
the bolded is what i would have to disagree with, while i am all for allowing the RA to defend itself, they should still not allow allainces in on FW, i mean on a funny note, it would blob up low sec even more and we would have a million more threads about pirates complaining about blobbed up low sec, this would blob it up even more, on a serious note, most people that play FW are in (or are) high sec based corps and have probably no access to capital ships like dreads and motherships, and IF they do, they are not going to pull it out and put it in the line of fire, and it has been proven that capital ships CAN be destroyed in FW, as RA had lost what? 3 carriers a few days ago? so it is possible for a capital to be destroyed, this is why alliances should not be allowed in high sec, they have FLEETS of capital ships, a carrier or 2 by themselves is nothing but when you have like 6 dreads, and 8 carriers/motherships, thats when it becomes impossible to defeat, PLUS they have support fleets for them which they would use
|
Alex Under
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:01:00 -
[252]
Great job Caldari Protectorate!
Hope you get a good turnout when the Tower comes out of re-inforce. I don't think anyone would mind RA not having a few low-sec Dysprosium and Promethium moons.
___________________________________________________
|
TheG2
Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:03:00 -
[253]
Alliances, whine elsewhere.
CCP should and will not allow you to war dec Militias, and any organized group in NPC corps could have done this at any time.
Red Alliance knew exactly what they were doing with those carriers, they were trying to be smart and gonna pop some FW people, they underestimated the FW fleets and lost carriers.
Its about time Alliances realized the game isn't all about them, especially when it comes to empire.
|
hammyhamm
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:12:00 -
[254]
Originally by: OMGimaDONKEY
spin it as you will but maybe the caldari militia will drop a pos there to pay for ship loss. it funny to see all the fanboiz coming to ra's defense I'm sure they can wipe their own arse no need for you to que for it
NPC corps can't anchor POSes.
|
Jmanis Catharg
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:17:00 -
[255]
Quote:
Allow any player based alliance to wardec a faction in this case the caldari state, and the RA Boys and Girls loose the free ride of safety in Caldari Hi-Sec space just as faction wars was designed.
Provided that gives free free reign for the Caldari State (aka CCP) to drop Titans in just like Caldari did to Gallente.
|
RemusVI
Legion Federation
Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 16:20:00 -
[256]
Originally by: Wendat Huron
Screw the Federation, stick it to RA and their horde of russian minions.
we are not to be taken lightly 
LEGION FEDERATION
"We beleive in Vigilence ,Federalism and Freedom"
President Of The Council and Fleet Admiral:
Admiral RemusVI |
Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:01:00 -
[257]
Edited by: Pr1ncess Alia on 14/06/2008 17:02:35
Originally by: hammyhamm
Edited by: hammyhamm on 14/06/2008 12:25:26
If RA do lose one of their POSes and it is somehow retowered by someone else, who do you think will be getting the 10billion isk p/month profit from them?
Caldari faction players are having their naivety used against them as a proxy to wage another alliances' war, except the pubbie faction pilots will be the ones out of pocket when the day is done, with no recompense to show for their efforts.
EDIT: Nice work though, I imagine trying to FC the militias would be a nightmare :)
out of pocket? but they are using cheap t1 ships
they are kinda just being goons in space. they dont really care what the end result of their pew pew is, they just want to pew pew
you know, they are living the dream. cheap fun pvp
you know, the dream goonswarm tries to convince themselves they are living (and not anal 0.0 politics) 
edit: and who really cares about the 10bil a month? i can see you and RA sure do. we can probly consider cage rattled
|
Altomat
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:08:00 -
[258]
Originally by: Alex Under
Great job Caldari Protectorate!
Hope you get a good turnout when the Tower comes out of re-inforce. I don't think anyone would mind RA not having a few low-sec Dysprosium and Promethium moons.
When comes the tower out of reinforced mode?
|
Nannageddon
Farmer Killers
United Corporations Against Macros
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:12:00 -
[259]
^^ Read in Yoda's voice.
|
Everyone Dies
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:17:00 -
[260]
CCP should really make these FW militias war declarable. They really don't deserve any special treatment. Then Alliances can show those noobs what real pvp is.
|
|
|
Splagada
Tides of Silence
Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:18:00 -
[261]
what system/moon was it? and when is the strontium timer exactly?
------
Tides of Silence |
Sleyn Peade
Twilight Fleet
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:36:00 -
[262]
Originally by: Splagada
what system/moon was it? and when is the strontium timer exactly?
This!!
We wanna know
*readies covops alt*
|
Tortun Nahme
Umbra Synergy
Final Retribution Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:43:00 -
[263]
people are engaging in pvp in low sec, who cares about war deccing
ITS A GOOD THING
Originally by: Cecil Montague
They should change that warning on entering low sec to:
"Go read Crime and Punishment for a few days then come back."
|
Asuka Smith
The Defias Brotherhood
DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:47:00 -
[264]
Originally by: Tortun Nahme
people are engaging in pvp in low sec, who cares about war deccing
ITS A GOOD THING
No, this is the worst possible implementation of the idea I posted a while ago about how to stop NPC corp abuse.
This is ORGANIZED NPC corp abuse. People are right to say that it could have been done with SWA but the difficulty in organizing a bunch of SWA noobs was deterrent enough against the abuse.
Now you have thousands of players who are war-dec immune and ORGANIZED looking to blow up something, anything, and if a BoB alt or a Goon alt or an anybody alt wants to lead a gang for pos destruction they are IMMUNE from repercussions.
|
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:51:00 -
[265]
Lol, thats pretty funny. I am interested to see how the whole thing develops.
------
Originally by: Dark Shikari
The problem with killing Jesus is he always just respawns 3 days later anyways. |
Tortun Nahme
Umbra Synergy
Final Retribution Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:51:00 -
[266]
and they are fighting in low sec, with no more immunity than any other low sec pilot, if you don't like the risk of a low sec pos, then you really shouldn't have one there hmm?
they cant war dec RA so RA is still 100% safe in high sec, so why should RA be able to war dec them? 
Originally by: Cecil Montague
They should change that warning on entering low sec to:
"Go read Crime and Punishment for a few days then come back."
|
Shintai
Balad Naran Orbital Shipyards
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 17:58:00 -
[267]
Did RA tell their pets to start whine and complain to defend them? They whine more than carebears ever did..LOL
Adapt or die, learn to play and all the rest of the quotes that now backfires. And its fun to see. "Waah waah if we wanted we could WTFPWN you all"!
But you are busy elsewhere or just smacktalking? Local seems to have moved to the forums again...
Abstraction and Transcendence: Nature, Shintai, and Geometry |
Rooker
Lysian Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 19:03:00 -
[268]
ITT: Attention Deficit Disorder
Read this slowly. Read it carefully. Move your lips if you need to do so. Here it is in six different languages (it would be in Chinese too, but I don't have the fonts installed):
RA fired first. RA launched an unprovoked attack, got owned, then suffered retaliation for their unprovoked attack. The ships that attacked were destroyed. The ships that did not attack were permitted to leave.
РА "выпустили первую очередь. Армения начала неспровоцированное нападение, получил в собственности, а затем понесли возмездие за их неспровоцированное нападение. Судов, которые напали были уничтожены. Корабли, что нападение не было разрешено выехать.
RA gefeuert. RA wurde eine unprovozierte Angriffe, bekam Besitz, dann erlitt Vergeltung fnr ihre unprovozierte Angriffe. Die Schiffe, angegriffen wurden zerst÷rt. Die Schiffe, die nicht angreifen durften zu verlassen.
RA tirT en premier. RA a lancT une attaque non provoquTe, a TtT dTtenu, puis subi des reprTsailles pour leur attaque non provoquTe. Les navires qui ont attaquT ont TtT dTtruits. Les navires qui n'ont pas d'attaque ont TtT autorisTs a partir.
RA dispar= primero. RA lanz= un ataque no provocado, obtuvo en propiedad, luego sufri= represalias por su ataque no provocado. Los buques que atacaron fueron destruidos. Los buques que no se les permiti= atacar a salir de casa.
RA avfyres f°rst. RA lansert en unprovoked angrep, fikk eid, og led gjengjeldelse for sine unprovoked angrep. De skipene som angrepet ble °delagt. De skip som ikke angrepet var lov til s forlate.
--
Let Us Avoid Systems Via Autopilot |
Everyone Dies
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 19:10:00 -
[269]
Edited by: Everyone Dies on 14/06/2008 19:11:06
Edited by: Everyone Dies on 14/06/2008 19:10:35
Originally by: Asuka Smith
Edited by: Asuka Smith on 14/06/2008 17:47:18
Originally by: Tortun Nahme
people are engaging in pvp in low sec, who cares about war deccing
ITS A GOOD THING
No, this is the worst possible implementation of the idea I posted a while ago about how to stop NPC corp abuse.
This is ORGANIZED NPC corp abuse. People are right to say that it could have been done with SWA but the difficulty in organizing a bunch of SWA noobs was deterrent enough against the abuse.
Now you have thousands of players who are war-dec immune and ORGANIZED looking to blow up something, anything, and if a BoB alt or a Goon alt or an anybody alt wants to lead a gang for pos destruction they are IMMUNE from repercussions. CCP can no longer sit on their hands about what to do regarding the NPC corps or else RA is going to dissolve and join Gallente Milita and be wardec immune but keep their vent etc and that is going to be ****** UP.
QFT
|
Megamina
|
Posted - 2008.06.14 19:16:00 -
[270]
please no google translation rooker, your french is horrible
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |