EVE Search - --> Tempest Again <--

All Channels

Ships and Modules

--> Tempest Again <--

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] .. 47 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Transmaniacon Minmatar Strike-Force-Alpha	Posted - 2008.08.12 15:26:00 - [1171] Hell I would even take a generic "We recognize the community feels this issue needs attention and will look into it"...
Trojanman190 D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.12 16:11:00 - [1172] Originally by: Transmaniacon Hell I would even take a generic "We recognize the community feels this issue needs attention and will look into it"... I'd take that. Especially in light of all the minmatar nerfing going on.
Jim McGregor	Posted - 2008.08.12 16:54:00 - [1173] Edited by: Jim McGregor on 12/08/2008 16:57:54 Amarr had more than 100 pages without getting a dev comment. You are wasting your time. Devs dont comment to threads like this. Maybe in a dev blog 6 months from now, somebody will mention that they are looking at swapping the shield/armor on the Typhoon, but I wouldnt expect any other changes. Cross-train. If you are not willing to do that, I guess you still think minmatar are decent enough to fly. --- Originally by: Roguehalo Can you nano Titans?
Siddy Minmatar Evolution Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.08.12 17:39:00 - [1174] Why is this thread still alive? I told you, train amarr. When EVE becomes oversaturated with amarr/caldari, maybe devs wills see they error... maybe. Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Amandin Adouin Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 17:44:00 - [1175] Edited by: Amandin Adouin on 12/08/2008 17:46:16 Because it's a huge issue that alot of people care about? Maybe everyone doesn't want to train Amarr. Personally, I don't want to. So I guess this is the only other way to go about it.
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.12 17:58:00 - [1176] New patch on Dev, apparently boosted Matari/Nanos. GO go go! -Mark -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Trojanman190 D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:18:00 - [1177] Originally by: Liang Nuren New patch on Dev, apparently boosted Matari/Nanos. GO go go! -Mark Lies, I'm at work so you better get your ass back here and tell us!!!!!!!!
AstroPhobic Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:24:00 - [1178] Looking at the last few dev blogs, I think it's safe to say they don't care.
Baron Primus	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:24:00 - [1179] TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR TL;DR My sig sucks.
Boz Well Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:25:00 - [1180] The post I saw suggested test server reverted to pre-speed nerf, but we'll have to see what's up. I haven't seen any CCP explanation.
elnukeo Running with Knives	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:26:00 - [1181] uhh...where is this new boost.. i usually just hear about stuff in game but i am eager to know. someone link plz.
Boz Well Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:30:00 - [1182] Linkage Who knows, they may have just copied the wrong directory over to the test server.
AstroPhobic Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:34:00 - [1183] Originally by: Boz Well Linkage Who knows, they may have just copied the wrong directory over to the test server. They probably hit "decrease mass" button instead of "-50% projectile turret damage" button by mistake.
Boz Well Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:36:00 - [1184] Originally by: AstroPhobic Originally by: Boz Well Linkage Who knows, they may have just copied the wrong directory over to the test server. They probably hit "decrease mass" button instead of "-50% projectile turret damage" button by mistake. I bet you're right.
AstroPhobic Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:38:00 - [1185] Excuse my pessimism, but best case we're worse off than we were pre-patch (current TQ). Which still fails.
elnukeo Running with Knives	Posted - 2008.08.12 18:54:00 - [1186] When they fix minmatar do you think they will give the cane and t1 cruisers +1 turrets. I would really like that. Begin trolling now...
Trojanman190 D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.12 19:26:00 - [1187] Originally by: elnukeo Edited by: elnukeo on 12/08/2008 19:06:37 When they fix minmatar do you think they will give the cane and t1 cruisers +1 turrets. I would really like that. Begin trolling now...or not +1 turrets is NOT the answer!!!! Why? Cuz our shit will still stink/suck!!!! You will still do worthless damage in falloff. Still have shit sniping range. Still have shit sniping tracking. Everything will stay the same!!!!!! You will just lose one of the only things we have left... utility high slots! If ccp adds a turret they will take it as an excuse to leave everything the same OR they will bork something else, like steal a low or hose our cap even more. We don't need that!!!
Boz Well Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 19:31:00 - [1188] Quote: Cuz our shit will still stink!!!! Odd word choice Troj
elnukeo Running with Knives	Posted - 2008.08.12 19:38:00 - [1189] Well other races cruisers have +1 turrets.. And when in the cane the bonuses make your ship normal to other BCs 1 more turret i think would make it special.. idk lol maybe we could just get a DD on all our ships where if we click on the cap, it activates? BOOM..what was the other thing i was going to say
Trojanman190 D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.12 19:47:00 - [1190] Originally by: elnukeo Well other races cruisers have +1 turrets.. And when in the cane the bonuses make your ship normal to other BCs 1 more turret i think would make it special.. idk lol maybe we could just get a DD on all our ships where if we click on the cap, it activates? BOOM..what was the other thing i was going to say Well sorry for sploding. But our guns still wont hit for any reasonable dps unless inside of 2km. That's fail even if the cane had 8 guns.
elnukeo Running with Knives	Posted - 2008.08.12 19:53:00 - [1191] why not just run around at 12km..still get good dps.. maybe we will get a bigger drone bay and ofc more turrets like you said. lol
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.12 20:58:00 - [1192] http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=845581 Looks like the Matari nerf is still coming. At least the MWD reactivation delay was removed... -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Amandin Adouin Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 21:46:00 - [1193] I think it sounds somewhat promising. I really have faith in them to not let this go through as is. Those crazy Nordic people are usually at least somewhat rational.
Cpt Branko Surge. NIght's Dawn	Posted - 2008.08.12 21:52:00 - [1194] Edited by: Cpt Branko on 12/08/2008 21:53:14 Well, at least they finally said something (and showed they can, in fact, read), which makes me very happy. The MWD reactivation delay axing was a good move. I just hope they fix the totally murdered agilities of Minmatar ships next. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Eve Defence Force	Posted - 2008.08.12 21:59:00 - [1195] Originally by: Cpt Branko I just hope they fix the totally murdered agilities of Minmatar ships next. That won't happen. I base this on nothing. ----------------------------------------- [Video] Support Barrage
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.12 22:07:00 - [1196] Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 12/08/2008 21:53:14 Well, at least they finally said something (and showed they can, in fact, read), which makes me very happy. The MWD reactivation delay axing was a good move. I just hope they fix the totally murdered agilities of Minmatar ships next. IIRC, the post said that they'd be adjusting the agilities of certain ship classes, not races. :-/ -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Cpt Branko Surge. NIght's Dawn	Posted - 2008.08.12 22:07:00 - [1197] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Originally by: Cpt Branko I just hope they fix the totally murdered agilities of Minmatar ships next. That won't happen. I base this on nothing. So Minmatar BS agility should be worse then everyone else bar Amarr now? Seriously, we need lighter duct tape. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Amandin Adouin Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.12 22:11:00 - [1198] Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Originally by: Cpt Branko I just hope they fix the totally murdered agilities of Minmatar ships next. That won't happen. I base this on nothing. So Minmatar BS agility should be worse then everyone else bar Amarr now? Seriously, we need lighter duct tape. According to the mini-dev journal, they're specifically looking into fixing agility back in some way: "The agility values are also slightly off. They were rebalanced with regard to MWD mass addition, which closed the gaps between ship types, removing uniqueness a bit. This will be fixed, also we're looking at boosting some ship classes in regards of agility." Haha I thought you meant duct tape for Lyria. I was thinking why lighter?
Trojanman190 D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.08.13 01:13:00 - [1199] Originally by: Amandin Adouin Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Originally by: Cpt Branko I just hope they fix the totally murdered agilities of Minmatar ships next. That won't happen. I base this on nothing. So Minmatar BS agility should be worse then everyone else bar Amarr now? Seriously, we need lighter duct tape. According to the mini-dev journal, they're specifically looking into fixing agility back in some way: "The agility values are also slightly off. They were rebalanced with regard to MWD mass addition, which closed the gaps between ship types, removing uniqueness a bit. This will be fixed, also we're looking at boosting some ship classes in regards of agility." Haha I thought you meant duct tape for Lyria. I was thinking why lighter? I thinkt he uniqueness they are talking about is partially with respect to minmatar ships... maybe we will get teeny boost?
Liang Nuren Perkone	Posted - 2008.08.13 03:35:00 - [1200] Originally by: Trojanman190 I thinkt he uniqueness they are talking about is partially with respect to minmatar ships... maybe we will get teeny boost? You mean nerfed a little less than they were planning on? I hope so. :) -Liang -- I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] .. 47 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.