Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
Before the last patch I was the owner of both an Anaconda and a Python mine BPO. Today when looking for these BPO's I could no longer find them. I had recently transfered them between characters via contract so I checked the contract to make sure they had gone where I thought they had. The contract does not display any items anymore and if you hover over it on the contract list it displays some garbage item codes instead of the item name.
So I'm wondering if CCP has just deleted them entirely? Can anyone else who owned either of these BPO's or copies of these confirm for me that they still have them?
If they have been deleted I will be a little bit sad as while they were useless they were pretty collectable and had a certain amount of value to them.
PS. A corp member just checked if his was around and its missing too. So any patch notes on this or any CCP input? Not cool. |
Khanh'rhh
One Man Rodgering
870
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
:CCP:
My BPO and the mines themselves that I had sat in Jita have been removed, with nothing in their place - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
So weak. So ah when do you want to organise the first meeting of "CCP Took My Stuff Anonymous"? Cos Im in good need of a hug. |
Bad Messenger
draketrain Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
117
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
there goes persistent universe.
Welcome all the new wow in space. |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 10:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hmm... better check mine (geddit) when I log in tonight
|
Jace Errata
Lawlz Brawlz
114
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
I don't own any mines or mine BPs, but it'd be pretty sad if they're all gone forever, and it's not just a temporary error. :| Stealth OST puns and blatant lies since 2009 Jace Errata on Twitter |
Florestan Bronstein
United Highsec Front The 99 Percent
455
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
A precedent |
soranno
14th Legion Sanctuary Pact
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Wow, in my view a very very poor decision to remove such an element of the history of eve. Not a big part sure, but significant nonetheless. i certainly hope it is reversable, and that it is done without delay. |
Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
418
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
Well that suks for those who still had those.
You have to cut the ops team some slack, trolling the player base with made up downtime estimates is the only fun they get around here.-á(CCP Nullarbor) |
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP, what you may see as a usless item that is no longer usable in game is actually a rare piece of the sandbox's history.
Simply deleting these from the game is a crappy thing to do, and to be honest shows a limited understanding of your players and the sandbox nature of the game.
In Eve, where a player makes his own story, many people become collectors of rare items. You (CCP) just broke that.
It was a bad thing to do and you should feel bad!
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |
|
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
871
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ho yeah keep loving your useless funky stuff from the past, just like good cave people, please don't evolve and keep wining, cly a little more please mu cup is empty.
Your tears are so delicious, c'mon keep it going
|
Tobiaz
Spacerats
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
I had a bunch of mines in my box of memorabilia as well. It's indeed very uncool if they've just been 'poofed'. Especially for the people that had bpo's for them, because those are quite valuable. I actually know a collector who bought a few of them a while back and I really don't see the point for CCP to even touch these items.
I'm guessing this came with the whole 'let's make EVE easier comprehend for noobs', but they probably won't ever come across one of these mines ever.
Going after the keepsakes of EVE's history is a VERY bad thing. It's like demolishing a museum to put in new housing. [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif[/img]
This needs fixin' |
Wilhelm Riley
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Uh, what about those of us that paid money for those blueprints, do we get any kind of reimbursement? Or do we just get stuff stolen from us without so much as a sorry? |
Ottersmacker
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
100
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
don't know about blueprints, but my stack of pythons has disappeared as well. welp The Order of the Falcon or Hin +¡slenska f+ílkaor+¦a is a national Order of Iceland |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
849
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 12:59:00 -
[15] - Quote
Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain. |
|
Aggressive Nutmeg
128
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
I'll quit if CCP ever 'disappears' anything of mine.
On a similar note, how did my Ibis magically get turned into a Gallente turd? Never make eye contact with someone while eating a banana. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
1258
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
So...this thing you did...any chance you can tell us for curiosity's sake? Or is it a secret? EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |
Lord Ryan
True Xero
515
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
If you don't want to lose it, don't undock it....................oh wait.
So now we got CCP gank our hangers? I demand free SP! -á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |
Mai Khumm
Apple Construction Inc Northern Associates.
181
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:16:00 -
[19] - Quote
This sort of thing they did was delete them...
"Being drunk is a good disguise. I drink so I can talk to a**holes. This includes me." |
Velicitia
Open Designs
793
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
you shall be dealt with like this guy
|
|
OmniBeton
OmniBeton Metatech
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:So...this thing you did...any chance you can tell us for curiosity's sake? Or is it a secret?
unconditional table update on production environment db... happend to me one time ... good times :) |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1005
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mai Khumm wrote:This sort of thing they did was delete them...
"looking at options" is not very promising stuff is gone, now they scramble looking for a useless way to placate the victims
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
Sirinda
Offworld Miners and Fabricators Guild
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mh. So, can I say lol server reboot yet? Or maybe boot.ini? |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3434
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
... I had one such blue print...
|
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2841
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:40:00 -
[25] - Quote
Well I hope I get mine back too! They were items of history and need to remain in-game! Last time you removed Capsules and they were never returned... wonder if you'll do the same thing with the BPOs - I hope not!
/c
|
|
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
369
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 13:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
OMG can you imagine postings if it had been the Snowball Launchers ? OMG He Spent His Free-áAURUM ! God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved. -á-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |
Velicitia
Open Designs
795
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
o_O they took our snowball launchers too!? YOU BASTARDS! |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
Chribba wrote:you removed Capsules and they were never returned Wait, what? I think I need to go and check my 'rare stuff' can and see what else may be missing
|
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
369
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Chribba wrote: Mimir Blueprint /c
OMG He Spent His Free-áAURUM ! God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved. -á-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
934
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
I'm a little disappointed with this.
As a collector of this kind of stuff I'd like to see this not happen. ISK as a replacement would not be acceptable. How can you put a price on them?
I just want the BPs back.
Hope it gets sorted.
Mr Epeen Me too!-á I ate one sour, too! |
|
Khanh'rhh
One Man Rodgering
870
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I'm a little disappointed with this.
As a collector of this kind of stuff I'd like to see this not happen. ISK as a replacement would not be acceptable. How can you put a price on them?
IDK, I just scam with mine. You can fool people into thinking they're a test item that shouldn't be player accessible - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
135
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
A lot of people with OCD here ... For all the-áomgz incursions are an isk faucet-áwhiners CCP Soundwave : "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally."
|
Tobiaz
Spacerats
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
It's not only mines, but appearently some of the NPC-transport dropped mining drones as well that have gone missing. [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif[/img]
This needs fixin' |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
858
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ok, so.
Bettik and I have been running a cleanup programme on our data over the last six months or so. We cleaned out a lot of internal crud in our data revisioning system before Christmas, Bettik reviewed every type in the game over the holidays to make sure the "published" flag was set correctly in all of them (this governs what's eligible for autolinking and contracts), and in January I went over the same data to try and clean out all the obsolete types sitting around in our system.
The criteria was basically that anything that should never have been legitimately in player possession, wasn't a current testing/GM tool, and wasn't likely to be made available in the immediate future, was flagged for deletion. We ended up deleting 1031 types, out of a total of 11430.
Out of these ~1k types, there are nine that I'm now looking at as candidates for restoration: the four mines, their blueprints, and obviously the Mimir blueprint. The Mimir was a straight-up mistake; the mines I'd flagged for deletion based on the (mistaken) assumption that we'd removed the actual mines themselves years ago and only the blueprints were in circulation, and it seems that when you delete a type, it also (sensibly, in retrospect) deletes the type's blueprint.
The good news is that when we do this sort of delete, the server keeps track of the deleted items for a while, and we made a copy of those data last night, so we know who owned what quantity of every deleted type. We don't have any of the information on blueprint research, so any returned blueprints will have "default" values (which I don't see as a huge problem for something that's primarily a collectors' item).
We don't do this sort of delete very often (as you can probably guess from how many types we caught in this sweep); there is a process for getting them reintroduced, but we have a few technical cobwebs to clean out of it before we can make use of it, and at this point in time I can't 100% guarantee that this will work properly. We are however actively pursuing reinstatement of the abovementioned items, and we'll keep you updated on our progress. I'm hoping to have this sorted in the next couple of weeks; normally I'd say "within a week" but fanfest next week makes all our estimates a little less predictable right now. In the meantime, contracts containing these items are likely to have issues, but otherwise things should continue to work normally. |
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:36:00 -
[35] - Quote
Thanks for the swift reply. Wasn't planning on using them anytime soon so as long as I get them back in a reasonable amount of time I will be happy. |
Marbin Drakon
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Long explanation
Off topic: I was wondering why I had fewer types when I updated my static data.
|
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1241
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:39:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hopefully my Jovian Ambassadors body parts are still in my hanger (bone splinters and such)... I'd like to hang onto them.
Actually, I'd really like for you to eventually do something interesting with that whole story line as promised... but I have no idea how many people have actually hung onto them throughout the years. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
525
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
bah the mines, what about my bloody hellhound drones?!!@
www.shipsofeve.com
|
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
533
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:52:00 -
[39] - Quote
So, when can we start petitioning to get reimbursed for the Elite Mining drones that have been in use and traded by players for the last 8+ years?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2844
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 14:56:00 -
[40] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:The good news is that when we do this sort of delete, the server keeps track of the deleted items for a while, and we made a copy of those data last night, so we know who owned what quantity of every deleted type. We don't have any of the information on blueprint research, so any returned blueprints will have "default" values (which I don't see as a huge problem for something that's primarily a collectors' item). Does this mean, that any restored Mimir Blueprint will suddenly have 40 new runs on them - thus introducing more ships... being the number of Mimir's in-game is limited to a set amount.
/c
|
|
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:00:00 -
[41] - Quote
If it means you get a bunch of free Mimir's Chribba ill gladly take one off your hands. Seeing as how I'm such an awesome OP of this thread <3 |
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
432
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:02:00 -
[42] - Quote
Dear CCP,
Whoever made the decision to start removing items from the game due to them being perceived as useless or unused does not understand the concept of "collector's items". This is a game where certain ingame items become priceless to each individual, be that item a bellydancer, a drone or a scribbled piece of paper.
Is the person making the decision to remove such items someone who was involved with Incarna ? I ask because of late, it is becoming evident that CCP is stepping into its old ways of disregarding the playerbase.
This recent launcher fiasco is evidence that proper testing was not done before releasing it and causing problems for many thousands of players. That, along with stealth nerfs and changes which are never documented or discussed, should be a cause for concern among all of us.
Please stop applying changes which only you consider to be of value when it is blatantly obvious from responses here and in other threads that what you are doing is wrong.
I have browsed through my collection of commodities and there are certain items missing, gone, vanished. I collect such items because I can and because I want to.
'nuff said.
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |
Shandir
Ferocious Felines
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:07:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: We don't have any of the information on blueprint research, so any returned blueprints will have "default" values.
I would hope this is obvious - but that seems like a significant oversight you should correct before running this type of 'clearing out' again. Especially if there can be some significant errors in the process (mistakes can happen, obviously), it should be *fully* reversible. |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
862
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:12:00 -
[44] - Quote
Chribba wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:The good news is that when we do this sort of delete, the server keeps track of the deleted items for a while, and we made a copy of those data last night, so we know who owned what quantity of every deleted type. We don't have any of the information on blueprint research, so any returned blueprints will have "default" values (which I don't see as a huge problem for something that's primarily a collectors' item). Does this mean, that any restored Mimir Blueprint will suddenly have 40 new runs on them - thus introducing more ships... being the number of Mimir's in-game is limited to a set amount. /c
TBC
Thorn Galen wrote:Dear CCP,
Whoever made the decision to start removing items from the game due to them being perceived as useless or unused does not understand the concept of "collector's items". This is a game where certain ingame items become priceless to each individual, be that item a bellydancer, a drone or a scribbled piece of paper.
It was me, I made the decision. The goal was not to remove things "perceived as useless or unused", it was to remove things that should never have been in player hands in the first place. There were a fair number of things on the list that were in player hands and were *very clearly* not supposed to be there, which we've since rectified. As per my long post above, the mine blueprints were not intended to be deleted at all, precisely *because* they were collector's items. A couple of the drones also shouldn't have been dropped, and are also slated to be reinstated. Overall, we cleared out just over a thousand types and we're still below ten false positives (ignoring the blueprints which were removed unintentionally). |
|
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2845
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:13:00 -
[45] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:If it means you get a bunch of free Mimir's Chribba ill gladly take one off your hands. Seeing as how I'm such an awesome OP of this thread <3 Sadly no I do not own any blueprint, I was more worried about a potential introduction of more ships - making the current become less rare.
/c
|
|
Ottersmacker
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
100
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:o_O they took our snowball launchers too!? YOU BASTARDS! they are still there.
+ good to hear the mines are making a return! The Order of the Falcon or Hin +¡slenska f+ílkaor+¦a is a national Order of Iceland |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
863
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
Oh, also, please hold off petitioning the GMs about this for now, there's nothing they can do about it because the types literally don't exist on TQ right now. There's nothing in the DB for them to give you. |
|
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:The goal was not to remove things "perceived as useless or unused", it was to remove things that should never have been in player hands in the first place. There were a fair number of things on the list that were in player hands and were *very clearly* not supposed to be there, which we've since rectified. [ ... ] Overall, we cleared out just over a thousand types and we're still below ten false positives (ignoring the blueprints which were removed unintentionally). Can you please provide a list of what was removed? I can't get on-line just now but am quite concerned about stuff that may have gone. Aside from mine BPOs, mine BPCs, mines and Capsules, I have quite a few other rare bits and pieces I've collected through the years and I wouldn't want to see them vanish.
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:52:00 -
[49] - Quote
I would gladly accept a titan BPO as a suitable replacement for now. |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Tactical Invader Syndicate
224
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:55:00 -
[50] - Quote
Arrs Grazznic wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:The goal was not to remove things "perceived as useless or unused", it was to remove things that should never have been in player hands in the first place. There were a fair number of things on the list that were in player hands and were *very clearly* not supposed to be there, which we've since rectified. [ ... ] Overall, we cleared out just over a thousand types and we're still below ten false positives (ignoring the blueprints which were removed unintentionally). Can you please provide a list of what was removed? I can't get on-line just now but am quite concerned about stuff that may have gone. Aside from mine BPOs, mine BPCs, mines and Capsules, I have quite a few other rare bits and pieces I've collected through the years and I wouldn't want to see them vanish. There is a past been list on Failheap
|
|
Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
418
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 15:56:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Oh, also, please hold off petitioning the GMs about this for now, there's nothing they can do about it because the types literally don't exist on TQ right now. There's nothing in the DB for them to give you.
Time to put up an emergency news item then. Not everybody reads the forums or even GD. :)
You have to cut the ops team some slack, trolling the player base with made up downtime estimates is the only fun they get around here.-á(CCP Nullarbor) |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:13:00 -
[52] - Quote
Salpun wrote:There is a past been list on Failheap Can you please provide a link? Not been able to find anything there
|
Velicitia
Open Designs
796
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 16:28:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ottersmacker wrote:Velicitia wrote:o_O they took our snowball launchers too!? YOU BASTARDS! they are still there. + good to hear the mines are making a return!
good :)
Greyscale, as an apology, can we haz snowballs ?
|
zenthral staichon
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:06:00 -
[54] - Quote
Chribba wrote:FluffyDice wrote:If it means you get a bunch of free Mimir's Chribba ill gladly take one off your hands. Seeing as how I'm such an awesome OP of this thread <3 Sadly no I do not own any blueprint, I was more worried about a potential introduction of more ships - making the current become less rare. /c
Chribba, m8, I know I sold you your Mimir but I've suddenly got 40 more. Interested?
|
Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:07:00 -
[55] - Quote
So you're fixing mines and adding them back in to be useful...
A good change IMHO *cough* |
ElQuirko
Gravit Negotii Rogue Elements.
391
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:22:00 -
[56] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:Ho yeah keep loving your useless funky stuff from the past, just like good cave people, please don't evolve and keep wining, cly a little more please mu cup is empty.
Interdiction nullifiers beat good gatecamps, just as poor spelling will destroy any troll - even one as weak as yours. Please go back to your hole.
If we distribute pictures of people, does that mean God can file copyright claims under SOPA? |
Deamos
Dev Null Development and Holdings New Eden Research.
110
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:44:00 -
[57] - Quote
Vyktor Abyss wrote:So you're fixing mines and adding them back in to be useful... A good change IMHO *cough*
Honestly, I wish they would rework mines. I know why they were removed, I was around back when you could use them.
Perhaps if they altered it from mines to deployable minefields, with a finite lifespan, only can do so much damage per tick scaled based on ship size (smaller ships get less damage due to maneuverability, only be able to be deployed in null space, and damage all ships, not just hostile ones, it would really add a dynamic to fights. It could even help to remove some of the blob warfare. |
The Snowman
Aliastra Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 17:48:00 -
[58] - Quote
Any chance of getting a complete list of things that were deleted?
I dont know why but I'm extremly curious about what they are! |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:26:00 -
[59] - Quote
When DO we submit petitions about this?
WTH is wrong with you CCP? Do you not know what your players have with regards to items in this game?
This was a really dumb move imho.
|
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
853
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:27:00 -
[60] - Quote
Bad Messenger wrote:there goes persistent universe.
Welcome all the new wow in space.
says the guy wearing the gold aurum starfleet uniform
|
|
Ordais
DARK ORCHESTRA
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:29:00 -
[61] - Quote
Talking about "not thinking things through"....common, if its not your "forte" ask someone at CCP that has that ability. This is one of these decisions that lead to bad things but are avoidable if just ONE person would play deviles advocate while discussing the issue. |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1846
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ordais wrote:ask someone at CCP that has that ability.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
146
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:34:00 -
[63] - Quote
I'll just say it again here:
The "Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED" was never unused. These drones dropped consistently from convoys in 2003 (typically 4-8 at a time) and were erroneously renamed at some point before Revelations expansion. They are absolutely meant to exist and should never have gotten the "UNUSED" tag.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:38:00 -
[64] - Quote
Entity wrote:I'll just say it again here:
The "Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED" was never unused. These drones dropped consistently from convoys in 2003 (typically 4-8 at a time) and were erroneously renamed at some point before Revelations expansion. They are absolutely meant to exist and should never have gotten the "UNUSED" tag.
Here I was getting all pi55ed about my unique ship collection and mine BPOs... how are you doing Entity? I bet you are livid!
I am not pleased atm...
|
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder Thundering Herd
369
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 18:52:00 -
[65] - Quote
Chribba wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:The good news is that when we do this sort of delete, the server keeps track of the deleted items for a while, and we made a copy of those data last night, so we know who owned what quantity of every deleted type. We don't have any of the information on blueprint research, so any returned blueprints will have "default" values (which I don't see as a huge problem for something that's primarily a collectors' item). Does this mean, that any restored Mimir Blueprint will suddenly have 40 new runs on them - thus introducing more ships... being the number of Mimir's in-game is limited to a set amount. /c
IMHO this is a FASCINATING mistake. Should be interesting to watch the results (how many Mimir's are made, etc) after the restoration.
OMG He Spent His Free-áAURUM ! God is simply-áthe very extraordinary power of the Universe to organize Itself as percieved. -á-á- Lee Smolin "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
149
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:00:00 -
[66] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Entity wrote:I'll just say it again here:
The "Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED" was never unused. These drones dropped consistently from convoys in 2003 (typically 4-8 at a time) and were erroneously renamed at some point before Revelations expansion. They are absolutely meant to exist and should never have gotten the "UNUSED" tag.
Here I was getting all pi55ed about my unique ship collection and mine BPOs... how are you doing Entity? I bet you are livid! I am not pleased atm...
Okay, If you want to know.
This deletion fiasco is genuinely upsetting to me as it undoes the 9 years of work I put into gathering the very rarest of rare items. Upsetting to the point of wondering whether I should continue investing my time in EVE. (cue "can I have your stuff" responses).
I'm firmly believe items should be left alone unless they break the balance of the game. A bunch of drones, implants and other crap that has no measurable effect on the game? Why delete it if they give people joy?
Perhaps it is not the "intended" way of playing the game, but for a game that is supposed to be a sandbox, being a collector is as valid a career as any other player's, and in the end we're all playing the game for fun.
I have items that are literally several orders of magnitude more rare and obscure than any of the stuff that was wiped, and even some (harmless!) stuff that is not meant to be in the game, and I fear for those treasures now. Regardless of how they entered the game (accidental or intentional), they are a part of the game's rich history for better and for worse. They do not harm the game in any way, and are great conversation starters.
Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1111
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:00:00 -
[67] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
This is beyond lame. Looks like some other old stuff like rare mining drones have gone poof too!
My corp has a museum hangar in which we are trying to collect one of everything in Eve. Stuff like the mines and the BPOs for the miners were always enjoyed by the members, especially those new to Eve.
PLEASE PLEASE put these things back for us!!!
In the future is you think you need to remove something from Eve, make it known well in advance to the community and NEVER NEVER NEVER take something away without compensating us for the loss!
(now I need to check on my melted snowballs and other weird odd stuff collected over 8 years in Eve!)
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate |
Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression
269
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:04:00 -
[68] - Quote
How about automatically evemailing everyone who had items confiscated and inform them of what they lost? I've had a container full of random misc 'collectors items' and i have no idea whats been deleted from it.... if anything... |
Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression
269
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:07:00 -
[69] - Quote
Entity wrote:Regardless of how they entered the game (accidental or intentional), they are a part of the game's rich history for better and for worse. They do not harm the game in any way, and are great conversation starters.
Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP.
Exactly this. I can understand deleting an item called "GM TEST TOOL DOOMSDAY" or something, but if its not game-breaking, remove the ability for more to be added but do NOT delete the ones that are already in existence.
People pay billions for these items, and then you just deleted them for no real cause.
It also hurts the player's trust in their assets. It makes us feel like any of our stuff can just be disappeared at any time. I feel for people like Entity who've spent years collecting this stuff, and now his goal in the game is directly threatened by this |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:07:00 -
[70] - Quote
Entity wrote:Gogela wrote:Entity wrote:I'll just say it again here:
The "Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED" was never unused. These drones dropped consistently from convoys in 2003 (typically 4-8 at a time) and were erroneously renamed at some point before Revelations expansion. They are absolutely meant to exist and should never have gotten the "UNUSED" tag.
Here I was getting all pi55ed about my unique ship collection and mine BPOs... how are you doing Entity? I bet you are livid! I am not pleased atm... Okay, If you want to know. This deletion fiasco is genuinely upsetting to me as it undoes the 9 years of work I put into gathering the very rarest of rare items. Upsetting to the point of wondering whether I should continue investing my time in EVE. (cue "can I have your stuff" responses). I'm firmly believe items should be left alone unless they break the balance of the game. A bunch of drones, implants and other crap that has no measurable effect on the game? Why delete it if they give people joy? Perhaps it is not the "intended" way of playing the game, but for a game that is supposed to be a sandbox, being a collector is as valid a career as any other player's, and in the end we're all playing the game for fun. I have items that are literally several orders of magnitude more rare and obscure than any of the stuff that was wiped, and even some (harmless!) stuff that is not meant to be in the game, and I fear for those treasures now. Regardless of how they entered the game (accidental or intentional), they are a part of the game's rich history for better and for worse. They do not harm the game in any way, and are great conversation starters. Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP. No... I totally get that. While a nub in relative terms... I've been trying to collect every ship and drone myself. It is NOT easy. These items are very expensive and I couldn't even afford the "cash value" of my ships in RL if I wanted to. What really burns me up is that we make this huge effort to aquire these items and than CCP just jacks them. Excellence my ass. I've been hoping for them to get better and I thought they had turned a corner at crucible but it looks like Grayscale is back to being awesome. If CCP screwed up they could take responsibility for it and just let you keep the items or give you something of equal value in game... but like with that Enigma those pirates captured the other week (and I'm not saying a mining drone is anything like that), CCP just tosses them a PLEX and says go F*** yourself. It really does make you wonder if it's worth the effort if you are never allowed to achieve anything... or if the policy at CCP is to turn a blind eye willfully ignorant incompetence... well then that might be as bad or worse.
|
|
Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
385
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:10:00 -
[71] - Quote
Dear CCP - I know that you want to erase past mistakes, but please realize that many people have become attached to these past mistakes. If the items are harmless, then leave them in the game. Learn from your mistakes and don't let it happen in the future - but don't penalize collectors for your own mistakes! |
Velicitia
Open Designs
796
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 19:14:00 -
[72] - Quote
Entity wrote:
Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP.
^^ this x 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
seriously, CCP ... you've got to stop with all the recent "trust us guys, you're gonna love us ******* up the history"
|
Bobbechk
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:03:00 -
[73] - Quote
Here's some more unused blueprints that you missed CCP Greyscale:
Avatar blueprint Erebus blueprint Leviathan blueprint Ragnarok blueprint |
bassie12bf1
Militaris Industries Cascade Imminent
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:12:00 -
[74] - Quote
While you're at it, fix the fact you can't autolink noobships? |
mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
141
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:18:00 -
[75] - Quote
Just jumping on the bandwagon here and saying that deleting deprecated items is a really bad idea, especially because many people use rare items to hedge against inflation.
I personally had a stack of mine BPOs, although I forgot how many I had. I hope they get returned :\
(also, messing with Entity's collection is very bad karma!) |
howling wind
Piranha Protectorate
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 21:57:00 -
[76] - Quote
Give the guy a break people! It was a mistake. Im especially confused about the whiney responses from some very famous EVE players. CCP Greyscale already said that it was going to be fixed, read the thread before moaning. It's another mistake and suddenly everyone breaks down and starts the standard "I hate CCP" bandwagon again.
Why not work with CCP and let them know exactly what you lost and try to assist them in their quest to clear out the database, that way you might get your stuff back faster and you'll be helping rather than just posting rubbish on the forums. |
Skye Aurorae
No Bull Ships
207
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:00:00 -
[77] - Quote
Once all the items are returned CCP should add a new 'signed letter of apology from CCP' to the game and hand them out every time this stuff happens - you know, the kind of thing that rare item collectors would like to have. Skye Aurora is a 7 year old Girl Who Wants to be on the CSM! Unfortunately, the Lawyers say you have to be 21, so.. Vote for Scott Manley / Skye Aurorae for CSM 7 An Expert in Dealing with Childish Arguments Over Toys. http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=458 |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
156
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:11:00 -
[78] - Quote
howling wind wrote:Give the guy a break people! It was a mistake. Im especially confused about the whiney responses from some very famous EVE players. CCP Greyscale already said that it was going to be fixed, read the thread before moaning. It's another mistake and suddenly everyone breaks down and starts the standard "I hate CCP" bandwagon again.
Why not work with CCP and let them know exactly what you lost and try to assist them in their quest to clear out the database, that way you might get your stuff back faster and you'll be helping rather than just posting rubbish on the forums.
You clearly missed the point. Restoring the items is good, but doesn't help much restoring trust in that CCP isn't going to silently baleet player assets in the future. And last I checked the whole point of forums is to voice ones opinion and concerns. Of course I fully acknowledge it's CCP's game to do with as they pl..... oh wait :lolincarna:
But fair enough, one guy's legitimate grievance is another guy's whining I guess. yay, forums.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
283
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:13:00 -
[79] - Quote
howling wind wrote:Give the guy a break people! It was a mistake. Im especially confused about the whiney responses from some very famous EVE players. CCP Greyscale already said that it was going to be fixed, read the thread before moaning. It's another mistake and suddenly everyone breaks down and starts the standard "I hate CCP" bandwagon again.
Why not work with CCP and let them know exactly what you lost and try to assist them in their quest to clear out the database, that way you might get your stuff back faster and you'll be helping rather than just posting rubbish on the forums.
Did you not read the Greyscale's post? He said much of the deletion stems from actual cleaning up of the database. Only when several of the collectors pointed out the legitimacy of having those items kept, that he relented and decided to "re-release" those items back to the players.
Also he pointed out that some of the items will still be unavailable including the UNUSED, which still DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE considering the fact that there is a unique history attached to it and they dropped through a legitimate means.
Please read Greyscale's posting before calling us "whiners." We have reasons for our dissatisfaction. I am also furious that I've spent more than 3 Billions on those missing drones and CCP decided to remove those just for the sake of "cleaning up" the database. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:16:00 -
[80] - Quote
howling wind wrote:Give the guy a break people! It was a mistake. Im especially confused about the whiney responses from some very famous EVE players. CCP Greyscale already said that it was going to be fixed, read the thread before moaning. It's another mistake and suddenly everyone breaks down and starts the standard "I hate CCP" bandwagon again.
Why not work with CCP and let them know exactly what you lost and try to assist them in their quest to clear out the database, that way you might get your stuff back faster and you'll be helping rather than just posting rubbish on the forums. If it was a mistake I don't think anyone would eve comment beyond bringing it to CCPs attention. I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm p***** off because Greyscale intentionally deleted these items because players "weren't supposed to" have them because they weren't "supposed to" be in the game... yet these items were obtained through normal game mechanics that were in game for years! Entity has been playing since 2003! If he has some weird ass drones no one else has I would say f*** yah that's cool and I'd pay a premium for them. They have value, and represent eve history. It's not about making a mistake. It's about being incompetent and not thinking about what you are doing before you do it. Some of us spend a lot of time and brain cells trying to accrue this stuff... this isn't a nerf. Essentially it's like CCP coming out and saying "oh, we changed our mind... caps were a bad idea. We're removing them from the game" and than compensating you nothing. Think some people would rage? The question then becomes... why buy anything? Why try to amass any kind of wealth or collect stuff if CCP Greyscale is just going to take it away when he gets bored from having nothing to fix in this otherwise flawless game?
|
|
Flinx Evenstar
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:17:00 -
[81] - Quote
howling wind wrote:
Why not work with CCP
You must be new here
|
Master Zeuth
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:30:00 -
[82] - Quote
I think I'm starting to fall in love with Greyscale. He really is working his hardest to represent CCP's desire to disconnect from their community as much as possible and destroy their existing playerbase. |
Toramii
Le Moulin Rouge
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:36:00 -
[83] - Quote
Dang, harvester drones have attained enlightenment and moved to a higher plain outside of this PERSISTANT universe. |
Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:41:00 -
[84] - Quote
I don't even own any rare (discontinued?) items and this still seems like a terrible change.
Skye Aurorae wrote:CCP should add a new 'signed letter of apology from CCP' to the game and hand them out every time this stuff happens - you know, the kind of thing that rare item collectors would like to have.
This is a good idea, but they can't hand them out every time... then they wouldn't be rare any more. |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 22:43:00 -
[85] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
Better hope the logs of thier presence haven't suddenly dissappeared too... " our logs show nothing lol.." |
Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
58
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:04:00 -
[86] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:a tale of lacking peer review, broken referential integrity, CASCADE definitions, ON DELETE triggers, untested production changes, incomplete knowledge, assumptions, avoidable data loss, unnecessary points of no return and untested rollback paths
Frankly, this read like a horror story from a 1990s internet startup operated out of the basement of someone's mom's place.
http://xkcd.com/705/ |
Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
87
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:22:00 -
[87] - Quote
Jint Hikaru wrote:CCP, what you may see as a usless item that is no longer usable in game is actually a rare piece of the sandbox's history.
Simply deleting these from the game is a crappy thing to do, and to be honest shows a limited understanding of your players and the sandbox nature of the game.
In Eve, where a player makes his own story, many people become collectors of rare items. You (CCP) just broke that.
It was a bad thing to do and you should feel bad!
^^^ THIS!!!!
Roll it back and never do it again CCP. Forum signature removed by GOD |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
158
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:46:00 -
[88] - Quote
Gogela wrote:[ Edit: You know what is NOT going to happen? Entity is NOT going to take over f****** Delve and Fountain with a full flight of mining drones. It just isn't going down like that. If CCP wanted to "fix" a potential imbalance or or something, it would take virtually nothing to just nerf the specs of whatever they wanted to remove instead. Again, I can't speak for Entity, but I would bet you he wouldn't even care if they did. The thing that makes those items cool is just their history within the context of eve and their rarity, which gives them value. Anyone with their head in the game would know that.
No, but Entity and others have so much ISK they could buy up every plex on the market for an extended period of time. Sure, market forces would naturally drive the prices down again, but can you imagine the hue and cry if people wake up tomorrow and Plexes are suddenly 600 or 700 M each?
|
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
413
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 23:48:00 -
[89] - Quote
solution, put mines back in just make them disappear if you leave the system. |
Camryn Rose
Vallkyerehub
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 00:05:00 -
[90] - Quote
Another epic fail.
Give me my print back and do some testing next time before you go live with this ****....
|
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 02:13:00 -
[91] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:solution, put mines back in just make them disappear if you leave the system. I have failed entirely to see what this is solving or responding to. |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 02:48:00 -
[92] - Quote
You should make a dev blog about this. 1) List all items that were removed from the DB 2) Evemail ALL players who had such items deleted. 3) EMAIL ALL players who have an offline account to say you deleted their stuff. 4) Look on the Test_Server or other server mirrors for blueprint info (even if it takes you 10 days to do it by hand) (the fact that a dev doesnt even know he can do this is shocking and shows why they shouldnt be allowed to delete stuff). 5) Kiss some serious ....
In the past names of items have been changed too. So just because something says "UNUSED" doesnt mean it wasnt once in game. I have an item that has changed Name, Type, and Graphic ID SEVERAL times. By your logic I shouldnt have it because when It is not the "thing" I acquired. A lot of new players will not know what the Jovian parts are for either, are you going to remove those too?.. It also means that if something today got renamed to "Unused" that someone would have the moronic idea to delete it some time in the future.
If there is some HUGE REASON to remove something then talk to the owners (I doubt there's many).. I bet some would be more than happy for you to make some things non-functioning or even add some other odd change to keep them in game.
Deleting stuff that players owned was just down and out stupid. If you screw up and need to remove something, don't wait 8 years to go about fixing it. And as said, It's likely that the people deleting this stuff has no idea why some of it was in game or if it ever played a role at all in the game. |
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
526
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 05:18:00 -
[93] - Quote
thanks greyscale, i have had to hold entity until he sleeps for some night now anything you can do to help would be appreciated.
www.shipsofeve.com
|
Momoyo
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 05:48:00 -
[94] - Quote
I can only imagine how much entity or someone would have paid for that enigma if ccp had let those guys keep it. Its not like anyone can fly the damn thing so its uber stats aren't gonna break the game. |
Hockston Axe
99
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 06:21:00 -
[95] - Quote
When you restore my stuff, will they be usable in public contracts? I know the mines and their bpo's weren't before. I hope nothing else disappears from my collection hangars again, ever. |
Jaden Mars
Old Spice l EveBowl Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:38:00 -
[96] - Quote
I've gained a lot of joy out of seeing the fittings of things like the CONCORD Swat Cruiser with the Mega Droner, Miner-China, the CONCORD battleship, the Jovian ships (and their fits), etc....
As I look - all but three of those fits have now been *poofed*... the Cockroach, Enigma & Visitant are still listed - but their fits have been changed to very boring T1/T2 items.... (on the plus side, this means attacking the audience of Jovian ships at the next Alliance Tournament might net some fantastic killmails)
Seriously CCP, it's bad enough that you took stuff out of my hangar & didn't make any attempt to list it in the Patch Notes (DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT) - but you took absolutely HARMLESS fits out of my fitting management that I could laugh with n00bs and corpmates alike in looking at the ridiculous attributes of those TEST items.... what was the harm in that (or the benefit of removing them.... they could not have impacted server load).
Entity wrote:Regardless of how they entered the game (accidental or intentional), they are a part of the game's rich history for better and for worse. They do not harm the game in any way, and are great conversation starters.
Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP.
+1
While I wait, I guess I'll just spam Jita with some ASCII and a link to this thread. . GöîGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÉ GöéGòöGòªGòùGòæGòæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòæGòöGûæGòöGòùGöé GöéGûæGòæGûæGòáGòúGòáGòúGòæGòæGòáGò¬GòùGòÜGòùGöé GöéGûæGòæGûæGòæGòæGòæGòæGòæGòæGòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥Göé GöéGòæGûæGòæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòæGòæGòªGòöGòù GöéGòÜGòÉGòúGòæGòæGòæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòáGòúGòæGòæGòæ GöéGûæGûæGòæGòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGòæGûæGòæGòæGò¬GòæGòæ GöéGûæGòöGòÉGòÉGòùGòöGòÉGòÉGòùGòöGòÉGòÉGòùGûæGöé GöéGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòáGòÉGòÉGò¥GûæGöé GöéGûæGòÜGòÉGòÉGò¥GòÜGòÉGòÉGò¥GòæGûæGûæGûæGûæGöé GööGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÇGöÿ |
Daisuke Aoki
Concordiat Concordiat Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:57:00 -
[97] - Quote
I'm not even a collector and I find this disgusting.
CCP, listen to what Entity is saying and return what you've taken. Every item, mistakenly put there or not (which, as he said, many, including the "UNUSED" drones were NOT mistakenly in the game) represents a part of Eve's history.
If someone with such a high in-game profile as Entity is considering leaving, THINK about what you're doing. And think about who else might follow.
At the very least, you're putting a bitter taste in a lot of people's mouths right now for no good reason. |
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas Moon Warriors
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 13:59:00 -
[98] - Quote
To be honest, I really think CCP was changing his course after Crucible, but I am in doubt right now. The real problem here it not the unintentional delete of items, but the TRUE desire to take items from player hands. These items, if should be at player hand or not, was not acquired by cheat / bot / or other non approved mechanism. They were acquired by normal game play, and so, MUST stay with players. It is like the recent enigma ship. Players get it by normal approved tranquillity game play. And so on the enigma should belong to the player, and not be removed and changed by plex (or anything else). If the enigma was drop by a lousy / careless CCP guy, I do not care. Fire him, but not change tranquillity. If something went wrong and when CCP find it, and there was NO player interaction, I am fine if CCP do whatever they want to do. BUT if there was a minimum interaction by player, nothing must change.
That is the real treat about what in going on, the CCP vision: Let take everything that should not be at player hand (without warning) and tell player to deal with it... |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
878
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:10:00 -
[99] - Quote
Fittings including non-existent types cause the fitting manager to fail to open properly. They were removed so that you could actually look at your fittings again. (And no, before someone suggests it, we don't want to make our code more complex and harder to maintain and therefore more likely to break just to support the handful of people who want to import invalid fittings for fun.)
I'm going to fix up the name on the Improved drone and put that on the to-replace list too. I've not heard a good argument for anything else beyond those drones and the other mentioned types, though. The capital hardwiring, for example was the *only* implant of that entire set existing on TQ, and I find it hard to believe that exactly one implant found its way into the game through wholly legitimate means. Further, in this particular case, we've deleted *all* the capital hardwirings because we didn't have any intention of releasing them any time soon. Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly means that this exact kind of problem, where we have things in the DB that appear to be in game but which nobody can remember *why* they're ingame, is more likely to happen in future. This is exactly the kind of ongoing problem that we were trying to prevent in the first place with this cleanup. |
|
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
107
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:19:00 -
[100] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:I've not heard a good argument for anything else beyond those drones and the other mentioned types
"We're changing it so deal with it", exactly the attitude i subscribe for |
|
JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
205
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:21:00 -
[101] - Quote
OUCH!
I just sold a python mine BPO to a collector like a little over a month ago... I'm not giving back the ISK, but I still feel bad for the person! |
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas Moon Warriors
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:50:00 -
[102] - Quote
Dear CCP Greyscale
Before everything, please do not take me personal. That said, fitting problem with the non-existent items is a poorly excuse to remove the itens. Simply unfit the item, let it at player hangar. If he fit it and his fitting windows crash, he will know the reason. Fitting windows problem is not an excuse to remove items, sincerely.
>> GÇ£I've not heard a good argument for anything else beyond those drones and the other mentioned types, thoughGÇ¥ << This is another poorly excuse to do what you (or someone above you) want, with are remove items from player hand. As stated by many persons before, these items are collector item. If you do not want to player use it, just issue a global warning telling that use a collector item is an exploit, easy. Problem solved.
>> GÇ£The capital hardwiring, for example was the *only* implant of that entire set existing on TQ, and I find it hard to believe that exactly one implant found its way into the game through wholly legitimate means.GÇ¥ << Ok, if you company had an inside problem with your employers, this was your problem, not the player problem. If your employer misbehave, fire him. If he was working with player, ban the player too. BUT if the item get to the hand of an innocent player, DO NOT punish that player removing the item. As above, just make the use of that item an exploit. If the collector player misbehave (with I really think high improvable) ban him.
TL, DR: Do not remove the item. That is not the solution. Do not f*** with the collector profession / game play just because you think that deleting the items is the easy CCP solution. The items already exist, and collector players invest time, isk and many times they personal RL money to get it. |
Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 14:57:00 -
[103] - Quote
Hmmmm, this thread reads like the Anomoly Nerf all over again. I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:02:00 -
[104] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly
I have received several apologys over the years from Staff for making such bold remarks. You are (in essence) saying that this rare stuff we have was gained through hacking of the game, or cheating devs (Like t20, but as his player name is in a naughty word filter for the forums we cant talk about it I guess!).
How can we argue for all the other stuff to be put back in unless you actually let people know that you killed their stuff, and list all of the stuff that was removed.
It looks like your gonna just keep dodging the situtation and say that no one complained. I dare say that any more refusal to deal with this in a manner other than "I cant see" or "it was illicitly received" might mean that your not the person to deal with this issue. Telling legit players who have legit items that they somehow cheated the items out of the server is probably ignorant. It would be a bit like walking into a biker gangs bar and calling them all rapist, murders, and crackheads. There's a good chances that most of them would be innocent, and that all of them would beat you to near death.
Man up. Make a devblog. Inform users of items that they had removed. Inform all users of what items types were removed.
It shouldnt be on the onus of users to compare DB changes to find out what was removed becuase your "cant see".
This is just another one of those things where you jump before thinking, and then tell us that your a dev and as we are users then tough crap. It does matter, get off your high horse, ask for help from someone internal if you cant deal with it yourself. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:18:00 -
[105] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:... Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly ...
Assumptions are the mother of all somethings that will get caught by the wordfilter.
CCP Greyscale wrote:we have things in the DB that appear to be in game but which nobody can remember *why* they're ingame, is more likely to happen in future.
Whoa, you nailed it there. That's exactly my point. I really don't fancy my treasures being at risk of deletion just because the knowledge of how they entered the game has left CCP and whoever runs the invtypes cannot seem to do this research themselves (case in point: me pointing out 7 year mail validating the existence of Hellhounds)
Quote:This is exactly the kind of ongoing problem that we were trying to prevent in the first place with this cleanup.
"if I don't know what it is, I'll just delete it!"
Yeah. I guess that's the easy way out.
My point still stands. What harm is there in having defunct/bugged/accidental items in the game as long as they do not break the game. They tell stories. They are part of the game. You gain nothing by deleting them but angry players.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:36:00 -
[106] - Quote
Terminal Insanity wrote:[quote=Entity] It also hurts the player's trust in their assets. It makes us feel like any of our stuff can just be disappeared at any time. I feel for people like Entity who've spent years collecting this stuff, and now his goal in the game is directly threatened by this
I take it you never lost a sock in the dryer. I've had items vanish without a trace from my apt with no explainable reason.
EVE is Real! Gäó. |
Kopfy
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:38:00 -
[107] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: ... We ended up deleting 1031 types, out of a total of 11430... ... We don't do this sort of delete very often...
Did you find any Villard Wheels among thouse? I've been looking for them since... 2008, i think. |
Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
418
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 15:38:00 -
[108] - Quote
Utremi Fasolasi wrote:Terminal Insanity wrote:[quote=Entity] It also hurts the player's trust in their assets. It makes us feel like any of our stuff can just be disappeared at any time. I feel for people like Entity who've spent years collecting this stuff, and now his goal in the game is directly threatened by this I take it you never lost a sock in the dryer. I've had items vanish without a trace from my apt with no explainable reason. EVE is Real! Gäó.
Greyscale Gnome's. They're everywhere!
You have to cut the ops team some slack, trolling the player base with made up downtime estimates is the only fun they get around here.-á(CCP Nullarbor) |
Bobbechk
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:02:00 -
[109] - Quote
It time CCP acknowledge the collectors of eve and add an actual collectors item class, that cannot be fitted etc.
And whenever you feel you need to "clean up" you just move the item to this new class with no stats thus making the item itself "useless" but still a valid collectors item that can be sold and linked in chat...
I cant see any problem whatsoever with this approach, just drop all stats of the item except the description and change class type to "collectors item"
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
169
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:09:00 -
[110] - Quote
Bobbechk wrote:It time CCP acknowledge the collectors of eve and add an actual collectors item class, that cannot be fitted etc.
And whenever you feel you need to "clean up" you just move the item to this new class with no stats thus making the item itself "useless" but still a valid collectors item that can be sold and linked in chat...
I cant see any problem whatsoever with this approach, just drop all stats of the item except the description and change class type to "collectors item"
I would have peace with such a solution.
At the very least I just want assurance that items that have 1 or more instances owned by players will not be deleted unless they threaten the game balance. I need to be able to go to bed and wake up the next day without having to run my Asset GuardGäó script to check what CCP deleted this time. (some called me paranoid for that, but obviously that script has been vindicated now) GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
|
Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:12:00 -
[111] - Quote
So your production documentation is incomplete. Make a wiki page about it. Wrap a bit of RP around it. Link it in the item database. Some farmer on a planet in cloud ring found a stack of weird items while working his potato fields, the public is asked for help with regards to their origins.
There, internal development documentation fixed. |
Sarmatiko
563
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:17:00 -
[112] - Quote
Posted about this changes month ago here and as always majority finds out when it's too late.
Also I want back my Infested Dominix |
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
108
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:27:00 -
[113] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:Posted about this changes month ago here and as always majority finds out when it's too late. Also I want back my Infested Dominix
That's because there is such little advertisement in the change of the little things, the big obvious changes are the ones that are broadcast to the public but the little ones CCP thinks will go unnoticed are brushed under the rug until it hits tranquility and actually starts affecting players.
Item's in SISI do not have the same value (both monetary and sentimental) as they do in tranquility and this i reckon is why nothing is ever said when they're put into place on there, plus the fraction of users who actually go on there in relation to TQ. |
Velicitia
Open Designs
800
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:28:00 -
[114] - Quote
Kopfy wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote: ... We ended up deleting 1031 types, out of a total of 11430... ... We don't do this sort of delete very often...
Did you find any Villard Wheels among thouse? I've been looking for them since... 2008, i think.
|
Toramii
Le Moulin Rouge
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:37:00 -
[115] - Quote
Perhaps CCP can give us a list of whats been deleted, I'm sure the player community will fill in the blanks as to how they got into the game.
I'll start, Harvester drones (plus improved, standard). Circa 2003, whether by design or accident these drones dropped from faction haulers moving from station to station within a system. CCP eventually removed these drones from hauler drops so the drones became finite in number and eventually rare. They were not game breaking items but became collectible, last time I checked over a year ago Harvesters were worth 50 million plus each on contracts.
The Anaconda and Python mine Blueprints were seeded on the market a long ago. Due to broken game mechanics e.g. inducing lag or players getting Concorded many systems away due to a security status drop, CCP removed the ability for players to lay mines and so the BPO / BPCs became collectible.
CCP markets Eve as a persistent universe, where deeds and lore are made. So whats next on the list, Eve tournament monuments, the ASCN Titan wreck, cause you know, how-many current Eve player s (or devs for that matter) know why they came to be and no one uses them - right?
PS, I possess(ed) a number of oddly named modules back from early days which no longer drop, along with drones, skills, BPC's, BPOs. I'm lucky enough to have an item audit from 2010. After the module renaming is complete will do another audit and be interested to see whats disappeared in-between. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
169
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:42:00 -
[116] - Quote
Toramii wrote:Perhaps CCP can give us a list of whats been deleted
No need. There is a list right here
Obviously the vast majority of items on that list are just test items and other assorted junk that never actually made it into the game. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
211
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 16:49:00 -
[117] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
Did you mine 'em? :P Vote Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7. -áhttp://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=433 Get War Decs, Sov, Low Sec that works.-á |
Rose Hips
Zero Dot Zero
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:08:00 -
[118] - Quote
EVE is Real! Gäó - Then they poofed my mines. Forum signature removed by GOD |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:26:00 -
[119] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:The capital hardwiring, for example was the *only* implant of that entire set existing on TQ, and I find it hard to believe that exactly one implant found its way into the game through wholly legitimate means.
Maybe you should look into that instead of swinging around vague accusations. How would it have gotten in game? Seems like a really lazy answer... but then I suppose that's par for the course per the lazy execution on this.
CCP Greyscale wrote:Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly means that this exact kind of problem, where we have things in the DB that appear to be in game but which nobody can remember *why* they're ingame, is more likely to happen in future. This is exactly the kind of ongoing problem that we were trying to prevent in the first place with this cleanup.
Can't remember? So I guess CCP doesn't have access to Google. That's a real shame.
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
173
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:52:00 -
[120] - Quote
I forgot to mention this:
I absolutely resent the accusation, implied or otherwise, that I acquired items illicitly. I have always reported any suspect/harmful items and ran any weird items past CCP to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong, and I'm sure a number of colleagues will vouch for my integrity when it comes to that.
I insist on getting capital implant back. and it's also false that that was the only such implant. Remove the dogma effects for all I care. Don't delete stuff I bought or was given fair and square, or at least compensate me for the loss of unique collectibles.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:55:00 -
[121] - Quote
Entity wrote:...or at least compensate me for the loss of unique collectibles. If history is any indication, you might get a PLEX and instructions to STFU. ...or you might just get banned. I'm sure they'll do whatever is easier and requires less thought.
|
Cindy Marco
Expanse Security
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 17:55:00 -
[122] - Quote
I can understand how going through a large list of items, how rare non-market items could be marked for deletion. I can also see how it could have made it to sisi before a problem was seen.
You said that deleting items this way creates a log. Then why did no one check the log when this hit the test server? It seems to be a reasonable precaution. They would have seen all the deletions there. If you delete a ton of items you never thought were in game, that should throw a flag that perhaps further investigation is needed.
But still, I can understand how this happened. As long as you don't take too long restoring these items its not that bad. Just learn from it, and in the future if you delete item types, check whats actually being delete before it goes live. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
174
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:01:00 -
[123] - Quote
Gogela wrote: ...or you might just get banned.
Cue articles on every major gaming site in the world. No, I don't quite think they're going to ban me for fighting for my assets/career :P
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
Amateratsu
The Pegasus Project
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:05:00 -
[124] - Quote
Were the Creation only skills like Genetic Engineering and Mneumonics that were recently removed part of this clean up? Are the other rare skillbooks alson in danger of being removed? Like Salvage Drone Operation....
|
Steve Celeste
Nex Exercitus Raiden.
225
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:08:00 -
[125] - Quote
I wanted to say that Greyscale completely lost it, but that would imply that he was competent to begin with. I guess my appreciation thread was not so bad after all.
There is enough material to send to some gaming websites, I think they would like to run an article on the goings at CCP.
Then again, Greyscale can do pretty much anything without the risk of getting fired, history has proven that. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:09:00 -
[126] - Quote
Entity wrote:Gogela wrote: ...or you might just get banned. Cue articles on every major gaming site in the world. No, I don't quite think they're going to ban me for fighting for my assets/career :P Heh... that sounds like a threat! I like seeing the fire. ...that said, I think you might be getting a bit big for your britches. While I realize you are probably one of (if not just "the") the most prolific collectors in all of gaming and in one of the most challenging environments, I think CCP would kick you as easily as I or anyone else. We are very replaceable and insignificant from what I've seen. I don't think CCP has any concept of the word "unique". Maybe there's no Icelandic translation. It would explain a lot.
|
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
284
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:10:00 -
[127] - Quote
How about Mining Drone - UNUSED? Are you telling me that 3B that I've spent to acquire those items have gone to waste?
Leaving the items causes NO HARM to anyone. By deleting the items, you just caused the very imbalance that you tried to avoid, by enriching certain individuals, while depriving stupid PLEX buyers (Yes Me!) of ISK and actual USD.
Please return the Mining Drone -UNUSED or at least, convert those into Hellhounds I x 2.
You claim that deleting those items results in no economical detriments to anyone. Have you considered about the transaction costs that many individuals including Entity took, to seek and purchase those rare items that were originally seeded in the game through CCP's incompetence?
If you want to delete those items... it's fine. As long as you provide an appropriate compensation to those who spent time, money, and effort in acquiring those items. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
174
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:13:00 -
[128] - Quote
Amateratsu wrote: Were the Creation only skills like Genetic Engineering and Mneumonics that were recently removed part of this clean up? Are the other rare skillbooks alson in danger of being removed? Like Salvage Drone Operation....
They were removed in Incarna afaik. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
Palovana
Inner Fire Inc.
159
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:18:00 -
[129] - Quote
Total dick move, deleting stuff, which just might make a new list on Cracked if they ever revisit the topic. Saves you what, maybe 100MB of database space at most? That's like blowing your nose before stepping on a scale.
That said, how can Mines truly be a collector item, if BPOs exist, they can still be produced, and due to the way EVE functions (no visible item creation date, serial number, etc) there is no way to tell between a 2003-built mine and a 2012-built one?
I'm from the Empyrean Age timeframe, so mines were unusable when I started.
Please support: export of settings in editable format
Your stuff goes here. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
175
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:18:00 -
[130] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Entity wrote:Gogela wrote: ...or you might just get banned. Cue articles on every major gaming site in the world. No, I don't quite think they're going to ban me for fighting for my assets/career :P Heh... that sounds like a threat! I like seeing the fire. ...that said, I think you might be getting a bit big for your britches.
A threat? This is just a hypothetical bull-excrement situation you suggested, and i'm playing along with it. I mean, come on. Why the heck would they ban me for complaining about them deleting my stuff when I have every right to be upset.
Also,
The Antiquarian wrote:How about Mining Drone - UNUSED? Are you telling me that 3B that I've spent to acquire those items have gone to waste?
Greyscale has already said they will be restored too. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? | [topic=6504]EVE API?[/topic] | [topic=6501]Cache?[/topic] |
|
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
879
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:24:00 -
[131] - Quote
If you guys really want a piece of history of eve, screen shot all your items and keep those in your computer.
A piece of history of Eve would be the first Quafe T-shirt, a Lego-Nyx, Leviathan dildo and so on. Pixels have no value if they don't belong to you...ho wait, that's exactly what it is ! |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
176
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:28:00 -
[132] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:If you guys really want a piece of history of eve, screen shot all your items and keep those in your computer.
A piece of history of Eve would be the first Quafe T-shirt, a Lego-Nyx, Leviathan dildo and so on. Pixels have no value if they don't belong to you...ho wait, that's exactly what it is !
Said pixels have value, actually. Like the hellhounds are ~2b or so. which equates to 4 PLEX. Your argument is invalid.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:32:00 -
[133] - Quote
Palovana wrote:Total dick move, deleting stuff, which just might make a new list on Cracked if they ever revisit the topic. Saves you what, maybe 100MB of database space at most? That's like blowing your nose before stepping on a scale.
That said, how can Mines truly be a collector item, if BPOs exist, they can still be produced, and due to the way EVE functions (no visible item creation date, serial number, etc) there is no way to tell between a 2003-built mine and a 2012-built one?
I'm from the Empyrean Age timeframe, so mines were unusable when I started.
As far as I can remember the BPO has no build requirements of skills or materials and cannot actually be used to produce mines. It can however be used to produce BPC's. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:37:00 -
[134] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:Palovana wrote:Total dick move, deleting stuff, which just might make a new list on Cracked if they ever revisit the topic. Saves you what, maybe 100MB of database space at most? That's like blowing your nose before stepping on a scale.
That said, how can Mines truly be a collector item, if BPOs exist, they can still be produced, and due to the way EVE functions (no visible item creation date, serial number, etc) there is no way to tell between a 2003-built mine and a 2012-built one?
I'm from the Empyrean Age timeframe, so mines were unusable when I started.
As far as I can remember the BPO has no build requirements of skills or materials and cannot actually be used to produce mines. It can however be used to produce BPC's. Incorrect. I had thousands of them in my hanger.
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:44:00 -
[135] - Quote
Gogela wrote:FluffyDice wrote:Palovana wrote:Total dick move, deleting stuff, which just might make a new list on Cracked if they ever revisit the topic. Saves you what, maybe 100MB of database space at most? That's like blowing your nose before stepping on a scale.
That said, how can Mines truly be a collector item, if BPOs exist, they can still be produced, and due to the way EVE functions (no visible item creation date, serial number, etc) there is no way to tell between a 2003-built mine and a 2012-built one?
I'm from the Empyrean Age timeframe, so mines were unusable when I started.
As far as I can remember the BPO has no build requirements of skills or materials and cannot actually be used to produce mines. It can however be used to produce BPC's. Incorrect. I had thousands of them in my hanger. When did you build the mines though? |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:47:00 -
[136] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote: When did you build the mines though?
hmmm... now that you mention it, it's been a while. I'm not sure. A year or two ago maybe?
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:52:00 -
[137] - Quote
Fair enough. I only really remember trying to build them on BPC's. I think I may have just assumed it didn't work with the BPO's. I would test it out if i stall had them :P
Testing after/if we get them back may not prove anything either if they mess with them. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 18:56:00 -
[138] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:Fair enough. I only really remember trying to build them on BPC's. I think I may have just assumed it didn't work with the BPO's. I would test it out if i stall had them :P
Testing after/if we get them back may not prove anything either if they mess with them. We have the tools...
Those are the stats on the BPO from the Crucible 1.2 (341054) database.
I really like that site.
btw - I don't see what the point of messing with the stats of something you can't even use would be, other than to give a big finger to the player base.
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:01:00 -
[139] - Quote
If that applies to the copies then I guess my memory has failed me. I guess if they can still be produced then the mines themselves shouldn't be all that rare or worth anything. Id like to think my BPO still held some value though. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:05:00 -
[140] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:If that applies to the copies then I guess my memory has failed me. I guess if they can still be produced then the mines themselves shouldn't be all that rare or worth anything. Id like to think my BPO still held some value though. Yah mine BPOs were going for about 300 mil or so. The mines were going for very little in contracts, but it was a good place to start out for people who wanted to start collecting unique items or for people who were profiting from collectors. I know a couple of people who were making a few ISK selling mines.
|
|
DeODokktor
Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:06:00 -
[141] - Quote
Yea, I seem to remember using bpo's without any issue recently. Not sure that build requirements were ever changed.
They made R.A.M. build times virtually 0 at one point, It didnt result in any bans.
Lets just hope this "DEV" doesnt deem tech2 bpo's to be something he "Thinks" in his own little world .... well .... that players shouldnt have.
Personally... I think they should move him to other jobs... Feeding the fish in the fish tank. |
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
68
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:15:00 -
[142] - Quote
Those poor fish dont deserve to die. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 19:21:00 -
[143] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:Those poor fish dont deserve to die. ha! I was picturing a drowned dog in the bottom of the tank...
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:13:00 -
[144] - Quote
Entity wrote:At the very least I just want assurance that items that have 1 or more instances owned by players will not be deleted unless they threaten the game balance. I need to be able to go to bed and wake up the next day without having to run my Asset GuardGäó script to check what CCP deleted this time. (some called me paranoid for that, but obviously that script has been vindicated now)
What is this script? Is it something you've released publicly or is it an Entity only script? This has made me think about what else I might loose. I'd love a copy if you don't mind!
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
177
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:16:00 -
[145] - Quote
Gogela wrote:What is this script? Is it something you've released publicly or is it an Entity only script? This has made me think about what else I might loose. I'd love a copy if you don't mind!
Sorry, Entity-only. it's actually set of scripts working together with my collection manager and typedb scanner and it's all pretty rough around the edges, not the most userfriendly stuff ever. Maybe I'll make a polished version at some point.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Evei Shard
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:32:00 -
[146] - Quote
As someone who was just starting to collect things, I can only consider the amount of Isk I will save by making the decision to do something else.
What irritates me the most is the attitude displayed by CCP about this. As a company, CCP in general seems to think that "act, then think" is an acceptable way to do things.
Players are open to change, but not when it is presented in "Oops! did I do that? Sucks to be you, here's some table scraps" format. Profit favors the prepared |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
427
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 20:52:00 -
[147] - Quote
Entity wrote:Gogela wrote:What is this script? Is it something you've released publicly or is it an Entity only script? This has made me think about what else I might loose. I'd love a copy if you don't mind! Sorry, Entity-only. it's actually set of scripts working together with my collection manager and typedb scanner and it's all pretty rough around the edges, not the most userfriendly stuff ever. Maybe I'll make a polished version at some point. No prob I just thought I'd ask
At least you are on the case. I'll just trust that when items go missing you'll know.
|
GavinCapacitor
CaeIum Incognitum
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.16 21:13:00 -
[148] - Quote
I had some mines I bought long after they were usable (only ~4 years old) as a curiosity. Never really had any super rare collectors items. I seem to be playing eve a lot less lately, despite recently currently being unemployed. Only log in to change skills and poke my PI + datacores for plex money.
Guess this is just one more thing. |
Ibeau Renoir
Colonial Fleet Services Independent Faction
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 02:57:00 -
[149] - Quote
Some funny type names that got deleted:
- 'Voila' Anti-Cloaking Pulse I
- Ore compression thingie Blueprint
- 10mn webscramblifying Drone Blueprint
- GM Ultra Mega Super Death Ray
- horrible tracking drone
- TESTCattle
- 'Helsing' Anti-Vampire I
- 'Blade' Vampire Hunter I
- 'Buffy' Vampire Slayer I
- vlgergh
- Test Modulated Veldspar Sucker of Doom
Oh also, I had a handful of mines (Python?), I think I even had them back when they were usable. Ceci n'est pas un sig. |
Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises Unprovoked Aggression
282
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 03:05:00 -
[150] - Quote
Pak Narhoo wrote:Utremi Fasolasi wrote: I take it you never lost a sock in the dryer. I've had items vanish without a trace from my apt with no explainable reason.
EVE is Real! Gäó.
Greyscale Gnome's. They're everywhere!
I learned early in life where all my left socks end up |
|
Caroline Grace
Almost Approved
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 03:11:00 -
[151] - Quote
Ibeau Renoir wrote:
Test Modulated Veldspar Sucker of Doom
Haha, that is a great name I would love to see something like this back in normal game even as a non-collector item |
Lina Miaoke
The Ostrogoths Curatores Veritatis Alliance
85
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 04:20:00 -
[152] - Quote
Maybe, remove DED Connection as well? |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
284
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:07:00 -
[153] - Quote
I believe DED Connection was never available... unless I am mistaken. |
Canine Fiend
Hidden Refuge
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:19:00 -
[154] - Quote
This is pretty tragic... I held onto some mines for a while. Not sure if I still have them. Either way, removing stuff and then Insinuating negative things about people who held certain items is absurd. Entity has a LONG history with EVE, and I know that he's one of the first people to yell and shout when something breaks or isn't supposed to be there.
Perhaps CCP should research HOW items got into game, maybe even include this history on the showinfo of unique items so that something like this doesn't happen again? I've been a CCP fanboy since 2004 when I started EVE, this isn't the way they're supposed to handle things.
[Edit] This thread would get a lot more exposure if the title was more accurate "CCP deleted items owned by players with no warning, only promises to give some of them back" |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
284
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 16:09:00 -
[155] - Quote
Canine Fiend wrote:This is pretty tragic... I held onto some mines for a while. Not sure if I still have them. Either way, removing stuff and then Insinuating negative things about people who held certain items is absurd. Entity has a LONG history with EVE, and I know that he's one of the first people to yell and shout when something breaks or isn't supposed to be there.
Perhaps CCP should research HOW items got into game, maybe even include this history on the showinfo of unique items so that something like this doesn't happen again? I've been a CCP fanboy since 2004 when I started EVE, this isn't the way they're supposed to handle things.
[Edit] This thread would get a lot more exposure if the title was more accurate "CCP deleted items owned by players with no warning, only promises to give some of them back"
Yea, an official indicator of what's "unique" and how the items came into existence on the item info would be a superb idea. |
Meklon
Minmatar United Freedom Front
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 20:38:00 -
[156] - Quote
Bumping this topic as, I too, am quite pissed off with the recent attitude which seems to be getting expressed from CCP.
First the renaming of items and now the deletion of things you can't be arsed to find out about, what's coming next.... "Oh, look, they haven't used any of those hundreds of ships they have in that nullsec station, let's delete them all because they obviously aren't using them?".
CCP, keeping up the standards of :excellence: once again. |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:21:00 -
[157] - Quote
Looks like the dev has decided that he doesnt know why we post, and instead of replying to us he's just going to try and make us go away...
After all, it worked for items, perhaps it'll work with players too.
Still waiting for the dev to grow some.
Post a blog, list the items removed (that players held, the ones players didnt hold doesnt matter). Inform players who did have things deleted about what they had deleted, item types, quanitys, locations. In form the rest of the playerbase why you decided to go all crazy with the delete button.
More to the point (once this is resolved) is why you were allowed to do this, and by whom. We often see really mundane things that require a basic fix taking 6 months and getting told it's because of the robust QA that goes on. It looks like (going by what was said) that this was one Dev who found himself having a little power and deciding to use it just so he could show his power. |
Camryn Rose
Vallkyerehub
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:55:00 -
[158] - Quote
Hmmm....We're not going away like the items....I want my mine BPO back, time meow! |
Camryn Rose
Vallkyerehub
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 16:39:00 -
[159] - Quote
Better thing to point out, when will they be returned? |
Barakkus
1520
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 17:39:00 -
[160] - Quote
Glad I didn't go out and accept a bunch of contracts for odd things like test bongs and stuff lol. I was just about to start a collection of random useless crap. http://youtu.be/yytbDZrw1jc |
|
Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
426
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 17:54:00 -
[161] - Quote
Entity wrote:Gogela wrote:Entity wrote:I'll just say it again here:
The "Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED" was never unused. These drones dropped consistently from convoys in 2003 (typically 4-8 at a time) and were erroneously renamed at some point before Revelations expansion. They are absolutely meant to exist and should never have gotten the "UNUSED" tag.
Here I was getting all pi55ed about my unique ship collection and mine BPOs... how are you doing Entity? I bet you are livid! I am not pleased atm... Okay, If you want to know. This deletion fiasco is genuinely upsetting to me as it undoes the 9 years of work I put into gathering the very rarest of rare items. Upsetting to the point of wondering whether I should continue investing my time in EVE. (cue "can I have your stuff" responses). I'm firmly believe items should be left alone unless they break the balance of the game. A bunch of drones, implants and other crap that has no measurable effect on the game? Why delete it if they give people joy? Perhaps it is not the "intended" way of playing the game, but for a game that is supposed to be a sandbox, being a collector is as valid a career as any other player's, and in the end we're all playing the game for fun. I have items that are literally several orders of magnitude more rare and obscure than any of the stuff that was wiped, and even some (harmless!) stuff that is not meant to be in the game, and I fear for those treasures now. Regardless of how they entered the game (accidental or intentional), they are a part of the game's rich history for better and for worse. They do not harm the game in any way, and are great conversation starters. Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP.
To expand on this.
When CCP does a re-design on a ship, they should introduce a new BP and itemID.
It's not Rocket Surgery |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2838
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:39:00 -
[162] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Fittings including non-existent types cause the fitting manager to fail to open properly. They were removed so that you could actually look at your fittings again. (And no, before someone suggests it, we don't want to make our code more complex and harder to maintain and therefore more likely to break just to support the handful of people who want to import invalid fittings for fun.)
I'm going to fix up the name on the Improved drone and put that on the to-replace list too. I've not heard a good argument for anything else beyond those drones and the other mentioned types, though. The capital hardwiring, for example was the *only* implant of that entire set existing on TQ, and I find it hard to believe that exactly one implant found its way into the game through wholly legitimate means. Further, in this particular case, we've deleted *all* the capital hardwirings because we didn't have any intention of releasing them any time soon. Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly means that this exact kind of problem, where we have things in the DB that appear to be in game but which nobody can remember *why* they're ingame, is more likely to happen in future. This is exactly the kind of ongoing problem that we were trying to prevent in the first place with this cleanup. This is a fair and reasonable compromise, thanks. |
ctx2007
Wychwood and Wells
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:18:00 -
[163] - Quote
i bet you guys at CCP get great pleasure robbing sweets from children and i want my stuff back! |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 01:09:00 -
[164] - Quote
When will they return? |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
440
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 01:20:00 -
[165] - Quote
Freyus Dreborne wrote:When will they return? SoonGäó
|
Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
254
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 02:12:00 -
[166] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
Please fixy, I had a huge stash of mines pre-built awaiting the day they might be used once again on top of having the bpos :(
Save the Miners! |
Lord Orefinger
Real Life Super Heros Inc. Caped Vigilantes
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 02:14:00 -
[167] - Quote
Where is the list of all deleted items?
I collected a lot of things - ship logs, prostitutes, etc.. that no longer drop and I cant find them now. I'm PISSED and unlike a lot of these people I'm in Iceland and perfectly willing to show up at somebodies door to ask them why stuff I paid real money for is suddenly gone.
Whats the point of keeping my subs if its going to go poof?
You have violated the trust.. and I want my stuff back, and a list of all the item types deleted |
Daniel Jackson
Planet Watchers
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 03:54:00 -
[168] - Quote
Entity wrote:Gogela wrote:Entity wrote:I'll just say it again here:
The "Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED" was never unused. These drones dropped consistently from convoys in 2003 (typically 4-8 at a time) and were erroneously renamed at some point before Revelations expansion. They are absolutely meant to exist and should never have gotten the "UNUSED" tag.
Here I was getting all pi55ed about my unique ship collection and mine BPOs... how are you doing Entity? I bet you are livid! I am not pleased atm... This deletion fiasco is genuinely Upsetting to the point of wondering whether I should continue investing my time in EVE. (cue "can I have your stuff")
you better not leave the game entity -_- you been playing for as long as i have, that Time alone is a item within it self dont give up! T'amber for CSM7 - Ship and Client Customisation https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=65862 |
Lady Naween
Good Vs. Neutral Stop Exploding You Cowards
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 04:50:00 -
[169] - Quote
still waiting on my mine bpo!
well on my main that is not this char to lazy to change account |
Dominus Tempus
Sykotic Assassins
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:40:00 -
[170] - Quote
I hate to see the effort that players like Entity put into collecting items treated in such a way. Is there not a way that both sides can be happy with the situation? I'm sure they can be allowed to have their items - even a modified version - that doesn't interfere with the game code.
Regardless, just mindlessly deleting things just goes to show that it is nothing more than a convenient fix. People pay real life money in order to take the time to acquire these items. That is what they choose to do in Eve. They love Eve for it, and shouldn't be ignored because they are a small minority that has no EULA protection and should be viewed and taken into account before any decision making is done.
Create a new item class, toss all the deleted items into it, statless, retain their information, and call it a day. |
|
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
361
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 12:42:00 -
[171] - Quote
Sad seeing CCP so hell bent on "streamlining" and "optimizing" that they shat all over the sand box. "You want to be a collector of rare useless items? Go pew-pew instead! We bring you war!"
One can tell CCP is expecting DUST to draw in players to EVE and is prioritizing accordingly. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |
Carniflex
StarHunt Broken Toys
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 13:35:00 -
[172] - Quote
I am not happy. My mine BPO's had quite a lot of research on them. |
Lord Orefinger
Real Life Super Heros Inc. Caped Vigilantes
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 18:41:00 -
[173] - Quote
Well I get the sense that as long as this thread languishes they will not care. It needs more rage. |
Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
108
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 19:00:00 -
[174] - Quote
I might be wrong...
...but wasn't this the same dev that changed null security space into its current form, left it linger while players raged against the change, realized the mistake six months later, and if forum readings are proof, CCP as a whole might get around to altering the same space in a few years but have other more important plans?
Entity's Rubix Cube pictures are spot-on with this fiasco still lingering. Unfortunately, I do not see much hope in the items being returned while CCP hopes it just blows over with Fanfest upon them.
But hopefully I am wrong concerning the return of items. |
Leana Salaea
Truth Behind Omega
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 00:57:00 -
[175] - Quote
Threads like this make me die a little on the inside. Incase all of you raging nutjobs have forgotten, EVE IS A GAME. a f*cking game!! Yea, maybe just blindly deleting a bunch of "Unused" items wasn't the smartest way of handling things, but ffs you are all having a b*tch fit like they stole your house and car keys. Seriously. gtfo of your basement and go enjoy REAL LIFE. Then come back, and you will realize that those pixels aren't really that big of a deal...if your UNUSABLE eve items mean that much to you,you might need to re-evaluate your life...
A concerned citizen of REAL LIFE. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
190
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:06:00 -
[176] - Quote
Leana Salaea wrote:Threads like this make me die a little on the inside. Incase all of you raging nutjobs have forgotten, EVE IS A GAME. a f*cking game!! Yea, maybe just blindly deleting a bunch of "Unused" items wasn't the smartest way of handling things, but ffs you are all having a b*tch fit like they stole your house and car keys. Seriously. gtfo of your basement and go enjoy REAL LIFE. Then come back, and you will realize that those pixels aren't really that big of a deal...if your UNUSABLE eve items mean that much to you,you might need to re-evaluate your life...
A concerned citizen of REAL LIFE.
To put things in perspective here:
In my case, CCP deleted assets that, when sold, would have paid for 3 years of EVE.
Let's see if you still have that opinion of yours when they do that to you, ok? GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Camryn Rose
Vallkyerehub
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:09:00 -
[177] - Quote
Still not back, still no answer as to when....lets go CCP, you can't ignore us. |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
466
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:13:00 -
[178] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Ok, so.
Bettik and I have been running a cleanup programme on our data over the last six months or so. We cleaned out a lot of internal crud in our data revisioning system before Christmas, Bettik reviewed every type in the game over the holidays to make sure the "published" flag was set correctly in all of them (this governs what's eligible for autolinking and contracts), and in January I went over the same data to try and clean out all the obsolete types sitting around in our system.
The criteria was basically that anything that should never have been legitimately in player possession, wasn't a current testing/GM tool, and wasn't likely to be made available in the immediate future, was flagged for deletion. We ended up deleting 1031 types, out of a total of 11430.
Out of these ~1k types, there are nine that I'm now looking at as candidates for restoration: the four mines, their blueprints, and obviously the Mimir blueprint. The Mimir was a straight-up mistake; the mines I'd flagged for deletion based on the (mistaken) assumption that we'd removed the actual mines themselves years ago and only the blueprints were in circulation, and it seems that when you delete a type, it also (sensibly, in retrospect) deletes the type's blueprint.
The good news is that when we do this sort of delete, the server keeps track of the deleted items for a while, and we made a copy of those data last night, so we know who owned what quantity of every deleted type. We don't have any of the information on blueprint research, so any returned blueprints will have "default" values (which I don't see as a huge problem for something that's primarily a collectors' item).
We don't do this sort of delete very often (as you can probably guess from how many types we caught in this sweep); there is a process for getting them reintroduced, but we have a few technical cobwebs to clean out of it before we can make use of it, and at this point in time I can't 100% guarantee that this will work properly. We are however actively pursuing reinstatement of the abovementioned items, and we'll keep you updated on our progress. I'm hoping to have this sorted in the next couple of weeks; normally I'd say "within a week" but fanfest next week makes all our estimates a little less predictable right now. In the meantime, contracts containing these items are likely to have issues, but otherwise things should continue to work normally.
Greyscale, it's really refreshing to read a CCP post that is this upfront and through with info. This is something you guys generally don't do, but should. Very nice to see you look into this issue, very nice post, and thanks for being swift and straightforward. shiptoastin' liek a baws |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
966
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:15:00 -
[179] - Quote
Carniflex wrote:I am not happy. My mine BPO's had quite a lot of research on them.
Protip: They are more valuable unresearched.
You just came out ahead. Stop whining.
Mr Epeen
Me too!-á I ate one sour, too! |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
466
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 01:20:00 -
[180] - Quote
Entity wrote:howling wind wrote:Give the guy a break people! It was a mistake. Im especially confused about the whiney responses from some very famous EVE players. CCP Greyscale already said that it was going to be fixed, read the thread before moaning. It's another mistake and suddenly everyone breaks down and starts the standard "I hate CCP" bandwagon again.
Why not work with CCP and let them know exactly what you lost and try to assist them in their quest to clear out the database, that way you might get your stuff back faster and you'll be helping rather than just posting rubbish on the forums. You clearly missed the point. Restoring the items is good, but doesn't help much restoring trust in that CCP isn't going to silently baleet player assets in the future. And last I checked the whole point of forums is to voice ones opinion and concerns. Of course I fully acknowledge it's CCP's game to do with as they pl..... oh wait :lolincarna: But fair enough, one guy's legitimate grievance is another guy's whining I guess. yay, forums.
At least Greyscale is honest and come clean about this.
But I agree, a) they should not delete parts of the games history b) having a single person (with the help of another) being fully in charge of deleting stuff from the database is beyond disturbing, and does not give much trust at all that he can just remove whatever he wants to, that quick/easily. shiptoastin' liek a baws |
|
DeODokktor
Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 11:44:00 -
[181] - Quote
Misanth wrote: At least Greyscale is honest and come clean about this.
But I agree, a) they should not delete parts of the games history b) having a single person (with the help of another) being fully in charge of deleting stuff from the database is beyond disturbing, and does not give much trust at all that he can just remove whatever he wants to, that quick/easily.
He came clean in a thread called "Anaconda and Python mine bpo's missing". Entitys thread was called "CCP - Perfectly working legacy items deleted ?! " but the dev felt the Anaconda and Python thread would be better. Okay it was frist, but the title is all wrong.
On top of that they have said in tthe past that forums do not count as official.
I havent received an ingame evemail telling me that some of my items were deleted either. With OTHER things they have done in the past I have received generic evemails from "The Team"..
It's a bit like fessing up to a crackhead that you killed a police officer. Or telling your priest that your porking your neighbour. Yea, It's coming clean.... Just on the quiet. |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1880
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 19:50:00 -
[182] - Quote
I like that when we petition CCP and the logs show nothing, we get zero out of the deal.
When it comes to CCP's actions in deleting things and the logs also show nothing, it means we are thieves and/or hackers. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.21 20:39:00 -
[183] - Quote
DeODokktor wrote:Misanth wrote: At least Greyscale is honest and come clean about this.
But I agree, a) they should not delete parts of the games history b) having a single person (with the help of another) being fully in charge of deleting stuff from the database is beyond disturbing, and does not give much trust at all that he can just remove whatever he wants to, that quick/easily.
He came clean in a thread called "Anaconda and Python mine bpo's missing". Entitys thread was called "CCP - Perfectly working legacy items deleted ?! " but the dev felt the Anaconda and Python thread would be better. Okay it was frist, but the title is all wrong. On top of that they have said in tthe past that forums do not count as official. I havent received an ingame evemail telling me that some of my items were deleted either. With OTHER things they have done in the past I have received generic evemails from "The Team".. It's a bit like fessing up to a crackhead that you killed a police officer. Or telling your priest that your porking your neighbour. Yea, It's coming clean.... Just on the quiet. The title was not wrong as I was only wondering where those 2 items had gone. Also im going to go out on a limb here and suggest that for the effort involved in a dev writing a script to mail specific people who had items deleted they could simply just return the items. I mean they could mail everybody in game saying we may have deleted some of your items etc but that would make more of a PR shitstorm than its really worth. I don't really understand what any more slander or bitching is going to accomplish here. |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 16:29:00 -
[184] - Quote
Any news on when these items are coming back yet? Not keen on this becoming 'forgotten'
|
Esna Pitoojee
The Peerage Amarr 7th Fleet
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 16:54:00 -
[185] - Quote
Dude.
Chribba gave me those blueprints.
I hope they come back! |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
400
|
Posted - 2012.03.22 18:00:00 -
[186] - Quote
Castelo Selva wrote:Dear CCP Greyscale
Before everything, please do not take me personal. That said, fitting problem with the non-existent items is a poorly excuse to remove the itens. Simply unfit the item, let it at player hangar. If he fit it and his fitting windows crash, he will know the reason. Fitting windows problem is not an excuse to remove items, sincerely.
Quoted for Frigging Truth.
Stop making EvE UNFUN, of making it EMPTY.
First the "door in face" at Incarna. Because giving players options sucks, eh? It worked good, amirite?
Then the deletion of those nice CONCORD fittings. I had several. They hurted nobody, they were fun to link and to make jokes with. Did they cause glitches? Who effing cares it's not like they deleted boot.ini. We can take care. Ok I get it, adding some IFs in the code was hard and certainly worth p!ssing off players.
Then the ******** mass items renaming to cater to some unlikely sub 80 IQ new player. Unlikely as in, they won't stay in EvE with sub 80 IQ anyway, it's not like dumbing down the lore and the tastiness of the game will help them.
Finally this other "decision", because you know, adding a "cannot use" flag was hard so we have to p!ss off Entity and others and cause 10 days worth of work hours loss to the company!
WTF is wrong with you? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 00:47:00 -
[187] - Quote
BPO's...I want mine back...lets go... |
Lord Orefinger
Real Life Super Heros Inc. Caped Vigilantes
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 03:16:00 -
[188] - Quote
I had stuff I EARNED on a MISSION stolen from me by CCP. I want my stuff back, I paid for it if you think about my sub, I did the mission illegitimately, went out of my way to get more than I needed so I could collect it, and it was my assets being stolen out of my hanger by CCP. I want it all back. |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
470
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 12:29:00 -
[189] - Quote
DeODokktor wrote:Misanth wrote: At least Greyscale is honest and come clean about this.
But I agree, a) they should not delete parts of the games history b) having a single person (with the help of another) being fully in charge of deleting stuff from the database is beyond disturbing, and does not give much trust at all that he can just remove whatever he wants to, that quick/easily.
He came clean in a thread called "Anaconda and Python mine bpo's missing". Entitys thread was called "CCP - Perfectly working legacy items deleted ?! " but the dev felt the Anaconda and Python thread would be better. Okay it was frist, but the title is all wrong. On top of that they have said in tthe past that forums do not count as official. I havent received an ingame evemail telling me that some of my items were deleted either. With OTHER things they have done in the past I have received generic evemails from "The Team".. It's a bit like fessing up to a crackhead that you killed a police officer. Or telling your priest that your porking your neighbour. Yea, It's coming clean.... Just on the quiet.
Relax man, what I mean is that he actually admitted that he did remove it, and that he was responsible. You realise how many times CCP don't say a word, at all, ever?
This whole situation is disturbing, and frankly disgusting that one or two employees so easily can just remove crap at a whim, but the common CCP reaction would be to sweep it under the rug. This time he actually talks to us, and keeps a dialogue. Post the reasons he did what, how it can or can't be reversed, etc. That's bloody massive improvement on CCP's side. You should know I almost exclusively call out CCP for every bad thing they do, I feel obliged to at least point out some good as well. (even if it was initiated by a **** move in the first place) shiptoastin' liek a baws |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 23:42:00 -
[190] - Quote
Not going away...Answers...now... |
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc. The Jagged Alliance
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 23:49:00 -
[191] - Quote
Freyus Dreborne wrote:Not going away...Answers...now... RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 01:28:00 -
[192] - Quote
FluffyDice wrote:Freyus Dreborne wrote:Not going away...Answers...now... RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
<3
|
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 00:51:00 -
[193] - Quote
Too much fanfest to worry about our BPOs? |
Ajita al Tchar
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
153
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 01:48:00 -
[194] - Quote
Leana Salaea wrote:Threads like this make me die a little on the inside. Incase all of you raging nutjobs have forgotten, EVE IS A GAME. a f*cking game!! Yea, maybe just blindly deleting a bunch of "Unused" items wasn't the smartest way of handling things, but ffs you are all having a b*tch fit like they stole your house and car keys. Seriously. gtfo of your basement and go enjoy REAL LIFE. Then come back, and you will realize that those pixels aren't really that big of a deal...if your UNUSABLE eve items mean that much to you,you might need to re-evaluate your life...
A concerned citizen of REAL LIFE.
It's a game but real effort goes into acquiring stuff (and a LOT of effort went into acquiring many of the items that Greyscale flushed down the crapper). In case of ships and modules and implants and whatnot you kind of expect them to be lost soon enough for the most part, and getting ragey about it would have been stupid. But in case of you spending literally years collecting items that you didn't think would be going anywhere losing your stuff is much more frustrating. Moreover, in this SANDBOX where Collector emerged as a hobby/profession of sorts, what you have is one dev singlehandedly flushing THAT down the crapper to. Sorry guise your occupation is invalid because you were dealing with useless crap and items that are ~obviously~ only in game because of hax.
Combine it with the fact that the change went completely unannounced by the devs, and Greyscale's attitude, and you have yourself angry players because the hurt is quite real to them as they saw the results of years of effort destroyed just like that. |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 01:50:00 -
[195] - Quote
It's a game but real effort goes into acquiring stuff (and a LOT of effort went into acquiring many of the items that Greyscale flushed down the crapper). In case of ships and modules and implants and whatnot you kind of expect them to be lost soon enough for the most part, and getting ragey about it would have been stupid. But in case of you spending literally years collecting items that you didn't think would be going anywhere losing your stuff is much more frustrating. Moreover, in this SANDBOX where Collector emerged as a hobby/profession of sorts, what you have is one dev singlehandedly flushing THAT down the crapper to. Sorry guise your occupation is invalid because you were dealing with useless crap and items that are ~obviously~ only in game because of hax.
Combine it with the fact that the change went completely unannounced by the devs, and Greyscale's attitude, and you have yourself angry players because the hurt is quite real to them as they saw the results of years of effort destroyed just like that.[/quote]
Its funny that they still think they can ignore this |
Jaden Mars
Old Spice l EveBowl Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 15:57:00 -
[196] - Quote
I wrote this a week ago & held back on posting it because it sounded like our items were going to be restored quickly. As it has instead been swept under the rug, I hope this will bring focus to what is really at issue here. Please excuse the ::WALLOFTEXT::
Collecting as a Profession.
GùÅ I had not even heard of EVE when Python mines were deployable, but I had owned several stacks. GùÅ I never got to launch a snowball - but acquired enough to fill a Caracal's highslots. GùÅ I only ever heard rumors of the Concord Special Ops Cruiser - but I collected the fitting & got to read all about the GM Cloaking Device, Mega Module, 'Voila' Anti-Cloaking Pulse I & Lockdown Module....
I joined EVE a year ago because it was hard, because of the Russians, because there was nothing that I was required to do. I fell into collecting because I am a history buff & all of the "illegitimate" item types GÇô from the GÇ£TESTGÇ¥ modules to the GÇ£GM Ultra Mega Super Death RayGÇ¥ to Buffy, Blade and Helsing Anti-Vampires GÇô provided a peak into ideas-in-development past & present.
Many CCP employees seem to be thoughtful, funny people who would be a pleasure to a pleasure to meet at FanFest. Others can only ape accountability GÇ£Yes, this because of a thing that I didGÇ¥, interest GÇ£WeGÇÖre looking at our options right nowGÇ¥, and compassion GÇ£My player owned both blueprints, I understand your painGÇ¥.
The thing is this GÇô EVE IS REALGäóGǪ until you do things like this. After 7+ years, canGÇÖt you see how itGÇÖs evolved? YouGÇÖre DEVELOPERSGǪ but IGÇÖm sure EVE has grown in ways that you never would have expected.
We want the junk in the database. WE LIKE THE JUNK in the database.
How cool is it to look at a Monet or a Mondrian? Some works are completely new, but many are revisions on previous ideasGǪ How cool are sketches from Da VinciGÇÖs notebook? Some are nothing more than doodles or rough sketches GÇô but they let you see into the development process & are creations in their own right.
IGÇÖm not sure what projects you have worked on [you being any CCP employee reading this post] but how would you feel if someone 5 years from now was looking through the items log & found the beta module with a clever description from your pet project & said GÇô UNUSED, marked for deletion.] Is someone going to go through and rename/delete all the Officer mods? GÇ£who are these people anyway, IGÇÖve never heard of them GÇô they must be junkGÇ¥?
The 1000 items expunged from the database represent thousands of hours of ideas, discussions & coding - and had a specific function at the time they were created. Why they weren't deleted immediately after is unknown - but they've taken on a life of their own in the sandbox. This isn't Office Space, so Bob - you canGÇÖt just GÇ£fix the glitchGÇ¥.
Please restore all items that were recently deleted. You already have attributes that can be changed to make the modules impossible to equip (slap a Polaris skill requirement on each for good measure)GǪ add Polaris req (if you're so inclined) to the manufacturing skill requirements for all the blueprints that you removed and restore them too.
Just because many in Eve donGÇÖt appreciate this viewpoint doesnGÇÖt give you the right to kill something. Being a CCP employee & a GM does give you the power, but power doesnGÇÖt give you the right.
This whole thing has already blown up in your face GÇô and is poised to waste a lot of your time over the next week. Instead of defending your position (at work and in the forums) GÇô write a batch file that will add Polaris to everything youGÇÖre worried about & restore the list.
DonGÇÖt be the guy that makes changes that canGÇÖt be considered improvements. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
206
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 16:29:00 -
[197] - Quote
Jaden Mars wrote:I wrote this a week ago & held back on posting it because it sounded like our items were going to be restored quickly. As it has instead been swept under the rug, I hope this will bring focus to what is really at issue here. Please excuse the ::WALLOFTEXT::
Collecting as a Profession.
I mostly agree. Except for one thing:
Types that have no instances in player hands are irrelevant. Anyone can make funky fitting links with arbitrary types in it. These have no value and it would be ridiculous for CCP to be forced to keep a type in just because someone made a fitting link of it. (really, it's trivial to produce those).
I'm only asking for restoration of all types that were owned by players. Including that capital implant and the chalcopyrite mission ore, and for CCP to be more considerate when it comes to emergent gameplay such as collecting in the future.
Deleting stuff is just a slap in the face to people who have stayed with EVE for better and worse since the beginning, and spent countless hours and billions of ISK tracking down and acquiring the "odd" items.
Another problem here is, we collectors are a minority, so CCP can basically just go "LOL WHATEVER" and ignore us.
Ok, they're restoring most of the items because lots of people were affected and cried out, but I'm not getting my implant back because I'm the only guy that had one? Awesome. Why do I even bother getting unique items?
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
400
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 16:51:00 -
[198] - Quote
Ordais wrote:someone at CCP that has that ability.
dude, this is CCP. I don't even know if they know what they are doing every time they fiddle with the DB and server code.
Somebody sees that heap of code and says "hmm needs cleanup!" and then one day, you login and you get ponies and hello kitty ships, and then it's game over man.
game over! [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |
Athelas Loraiel
StarFleet Enterprises RED.Legion
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 17:32:00 -
[199] - Quote
Good that both are coming back. Can someone explain and remind me why don't we have them mimes anymore?
It sounds very posh to have a bunch of mines dumped on the gate while being chased by the mob.
Or even better, If someone remembers David Brin's around the saturn manouver while dumping water in space...
Anyway, would be interesting to put some punishment into attacking/sieging caps and SCaps. |
Athelas Loraiel
StarFleet Enterprises RED.Legion
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 17:34:00 -
[200] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Hopefully my Jovian Ambassadors body parts are still in my hanger (bone splinters and such)... I'd like to hang onto them
LoL |
|
True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 17:44:00 -
[201] - Quote
I had two Hellhound drones that I have owned for many, many years, I sold one to t'amber to help them get their 5 strong collection and have kept the second as sentimentality, I'm sad to hear it is gone and I do hope I get it back, I would never sell or part with it. |
mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 18:30:00 -
[202] - Quote
Athelas Loraiel wrote:Good that both are coming back. Can someone explain and remind me why don't we have them mimes anymore?
It sounds very posh to have a bunch of mines dumped on the gate while being chased by the mob.
Lag, and there was the incident with mines on a trade hub... |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:19:00 -
[203] - Quote
Where was this information in the patch notes ?
I filed a bug report about being unable to see ships in the fittings manager.. No response to it..
Perhaps in the future before deleting anything from the game, you should run a script to see if anyone has one.. And then decide how you are going to compensate them.. you know, before you do it.
I'm not a huge collector.. I have a few things.. Few Snowballs.. I had some mines.. etc.. Why should I continue to collect if at a Dev's whim I'll lose those items, and any ISK spent getting them.
Only reason I even know of any of this is I commented in a channel and someone saw this.. maybe my own fault for not following the forums, but I read the patch notes, and try and keep up on that stuff.. Yet here I am.. finding out stuff I paid for, or would have paid for in the future, to just disappear , and I'd never even know till I looked in the can again..
I'm very disappointed, as a new-ish player, in all of this.. And in some of the responses from the Devs that just felt like a blowoff..
edit.
Oh, and to the comment about some of this stuff being got through illicit means.. Where are all the Tech II BPO's on this deletion list ? Cause until those have been removed [ or made available for through the game for other to get a hold of ], items which basically corner the market on all those items, you really don't get the high ground about removing any other items that might have questionable origins but do no harm to anyone else. |
Mecinia Lua
Galactic Express Intrepid Crossing
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:24:00 -
[204] - Quote
Thanks for taking our rare collectibles. We appreciate it :(.
I had the mine bpos several snowball launchers etc all wiped out and no isk won't make up for it. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
468
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 20:45:00 -
[205] - Quote
Mecinia Lua wrote:Thanks for taking our rare collectibles. We appreciate it :(.
I had the mine bpos several snowball launchers etc all wiped out and no isk won't make up for it. Mines - F'n a brah but I think we are getting those back. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but the drones and mines are coming back.
Snowball Launchers - I had 11 in my hanger and now I have... 11. Yah it looks like snowball launchers were NOT removed. I had both the versions of snowballs and there was only one version of launcher for both releases so there should not be variations in who got there's removed and who did not. Snowball launchers are still in the DB so if yours are missing check your assets and if they are still missing I guess submit a petition... because you should still have them.
Edit - Inventory Check Ammo: Melted Snowball MMV: 1248 Melted Snowball MMVIII: 1467
...nothing to see here.
|
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
433
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 21:57:00 -
[206] - Quote
I have lost none of my few collectibles (I am not a collector after all) but I can see how it'd be massively annoying for those who spent years and billions into acquiring them.
/support Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Ajita al Tchar
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
153
|
Posted - 2012.03.25 23:32:00 -
[207] - Quote
I think it's time to add this term to EVE's slang: "to CCP"
Definition: when something you owned mysteriously disappears as if it never existed. It can occur via cop theft, the owner accidentally trashing it, the owner blowing it up while drunk out of their mind, etc.
Usage examples:
- "Holy crap, looks like our corp's 1000 Drakes and a bunch of other stuff was CCP'd!"
- "Whoops, accidentally hit "self destruct", ship done did CCP. Didn't want that titan anyway."
- "Hey noobs, did you know there were cool items like mines in the game? D'oh, of course you don't, EVE's history in the form of rare items was CCP'd in 2012".
- "Remember there was this cool spaceship game, EVE? Too bad it got CCP'd"
(Alternative definition: to sweep something under the rug and never speak of it again.) |
Sphit Ker
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 01:14:00 -
[208] - Quote
Maybe give them back as "Disabled Mines" or some such? Just saying... |
Selene D'Celeste
The D'Celeste Trading Company ISK Six
319
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 01:31:00 -
[209] - Quote
Sphit Ker wrote:Maybe give them back as "Disabled Mines" or some such? Just saying...
Hell they could label anything that has instances in the game but is unused with the [Collector's Edition] flag, or something equally pseudo-clever, so that these items are easily recognizable for that they are by both dev and player. Would prevent this kind of nonsense in the future too.
Visit www.eohpoker.com and enjoy EVE's oldest ISK gaming service! |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
288
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 05:04:00 -
[210] - Quote
Selene D'Celeste wrote:Sphit Ker wrote:Maybe give them back as "Disabled Mines" or some such? Just saying... Hell they could label anything that has instances in the game but is unused with the [Collector's Edition] flag, or something equally pseudo-clever, so that these items are easily recognizable for that they are by both dev and player. Would prevent this kind of nonsense in the future too.
I love how we are actually the ones begging the Dev to flag such items for dev's own recognition in the future. Shouldn't it be the other way around? |
|
Ager Agemo
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 05:13:00 -
[211] - Quote
CCP you are just ******* up all over again with this kind of stuff, this is exactly the kind of arrogant behavior that messed up your previous expansion, maybe you should look at what you are doing at those plaeyrs that do collect items. |
Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:15:00 -
[212] - Quote
Rock and a hard place - a part of me is subdued to give CCP time since they had the whole fan fest party to play out but another part of me is annoyed that CCP seems to be stalling or hoping the whole is forgotten. Whereas I did not have any of those rare items, I would be ticked if anything of mine was casually dismissed and removed due to lack of information.
Would a week's time be acceptable to allow CCP to make things right? I've been blasted and knocked out for a day or two, but not a week. So that should give them enough time to recover from any hangovers and correct these mistakes... |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:20:00 -
[213] - Quote
Up to 11 pages and still no real response on a solution....LETS GO CCP, FIX THIS |
Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
263
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:41:00 -
[214] - Quote
I do hope we're getting these back still... Save the Miners! |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:56:00 -
[215] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:I do hope we're getting these back still...
Agreed...how can 1 person have the power to affect the whole game, without having to consult with anyone? |
Lost Hamster
Hamster Holding Corp
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 08:11:00 -
[216] - Quote
Not sure why it takes so long. I'm sure that CCP have backups of the database. They exactly know what they removed. So take a query of the objects from the backup, and with that info just script it to create it to the live db. |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 09:18:00 -
[217] - Quote
We know CCP want this buried, but did they really have to conspire with The Mittani to create such a **** storm that this was pushed back to page 5?
Very much looking forward to another CCP update here...
|
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 13:26:00 -
[218] - Quote
Hey, this thread is still here CCP, no response in days? |
Saint Lazarus
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
202
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 13:52:00 -
[219] - Quote
Any ETA on gettin our mines back? I'm sadface |
Bozl1n
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 14:40:00 -
[220] - Quote
I guess the days are gone when u "buy back" nielblug mining beams eh? |
|
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas Moon Warriors
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 14:40:00 -
[221] - Quote
Jaden Mars wrote:I wrote this a week ago & held back on posting it because it sounded like our items were going to be restored quickly. As it has instead been swept under the rug, I hope this will bring focus to what is really at issue here. Please excuse the ::WALLOFTEXT::.
Great points here.
Fist: ATTENTION ALL!! Greyscale is back to work, since he is already answer some question at another topic. So, let-¦s try to bring his back this topic too.
A agree with all quoted, and with Entity and practically with all here. All items owned by players MUST return to game. That is the most important point.
They should not call the player base bot/cheater/etc because you work hard to get a unique item. Do not matter if the item come to TQ because of some mistake/misbehave of a CCP employee, that items were acquired by legal game player and we should never be stolen from us.
We demand our unique items back. Fanfest is over, and CCP is back on track. It is time to get back to work to put our stuff back in our hands. |
TR4D3R4LT
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 19:12:00 -
[222] - Quote
What's more, how about not just returning items but instead ensuring the internal procedures follow simple formula;
Thinking about messing something that players own? 1. Check via internal tools/statistic department how big % of playerbase is affected, both subbed and unsubbed. 2. If percent more then 10%, make silly thread to eve-o about it, where peeps can flame/go nuts over it, important part is that they know beforehand something is in the pipes. 3. If percent less then 10%, check whether said item/feature/gfx has any gameplay stats that can be used in ships, production, whatnot. 4. If found on player accounts nerf them to be unusable, unfittable OR their end products to be so, retaining bpo functionality but killing the result. 5. Consider whether actual deleting instead of being done unusable is worth the bytes, it's not like CCP is short of them. Aka I'm sure Entity and other collectors would be just fine and dandy if they never could *use* their legacy collected pieces for anything, just that they exist.
Important part is to ensure there's guidelines in place for future, I mean you put server restart button behind glass after certain incident...
As for
Castelo Selva wrote:Do not matter if the item come to TQ because of some mistake/misbehave of a CCP employee, that items were acquired by legal game player and we should never be stolen from us.
No, T20 bpo's were not fine, there's fine line between gm event "jovian leg piece" and t2 bpo. One actually has huge gameplay ramifications where other is just hangar item xyz with different name, picture and description. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
500
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 19:24:00 -
[223] - Quote
T20 has nothing to do w/ this. He hacked into systems and broke some other rules. I'm inclined to think the item deletion thing is an honest mistake. People who keep random high value nick-knacks in their hanger aren't always able to be heard over the roar of alliance ragers. I'll help keep this thread alive as long as it takes. I'm pretty confident that CCP isn't trying to spite anyone. They just need to get around to this. Until then... *bump*
|
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:49:00 -
[224] - Quote
I bought the mine print specifically to keep it and go look at this and answer the inevitable questions that would arise. Its a cool thing to have and also valuable in game. That's why I also have some 'micro' items as well as civilian mining drone prints. These items need returned now. |
Phoenix Fox
Null n Void Voice of Void Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 04:44:00 -
[225] - Quote
well you have had your 2 weeks now were are our item as you said on the 15th it would take 2 weeks been waiting and still not back in the hanger as of this writing |
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc.
124
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:08:00 -
[226] - Quote
The dev in question as far as I know was last seen trying to prove his knowledge of how titans work rather unsuccessfully. That is probably keeping him busy. |
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas Moon Warriors
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 11:45:00 -
[227] - Quote
TR4D3R4LT wrote:No, T20 bpo's were not fine, there's fine line between gm event "jovian leg piece" and t2 bpo. One actually has huge gameplay ramifications where other is just hangar item xyz with different name, picture and description.
Yeah, I undestand you point of view. Roger, +1 for you. Beside that BPOs were not colector items.
Friendly bump to keep this important topic alive.
|
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 14:45:00 -
[228] - Quote
Come on CCP! Now that the Mittani drama is mostly over it is time to pick up this ball you dropped.
|
My Neutral Toon
Knights Who Til Recently Said Ni
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 14:48:00 -
[229] - Quote
I thought they took the mines out recently?
Some friends of mine fell victim to what they called a "Stationary Bomb on station"
Someone laid a mine and they got hit by it. Im not complaining, its part of the game!!! But I thought they had been removed?
I think they should be brought back. I would love to mine some Raiden. / NC. gates ...Can't. Tell. If ...Troll? Or Serious.... |
Riper GriM
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:01:00 -
[230] - Quote
Greyscale, I would like an answer on something if possible.
Why are you removing Capsules from the game ? Do they create an imbalance somewhere in the game ? Have they lead to unwanted effects on the world of EVE ?
I actually happen to still have one of them, and if it was ever removed, I would be pretty pissed off. |
|
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1059
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 18:02:00 -
[231] - Quote
Hi again,
Just finished resurrecting the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved (with fixed name) Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint
We beat the kinks out of our pipeline and these now all exist again internally with the original typeIDs.
We now have a clear process for getting these back onto TQ and then restoring them to everyone who owned them. Exact timescale TBC but I hope to have this wrapped up by Escalation at the latest.
Thanks again for your patience, -Greyscale |
|
Shandir
Ferocious Felines
93
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 18:42:00 -
[232] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi again,
Just finished resurrecting the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved (with fixed name) Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint
We beat the kinks out of our pipeline and these now all exist again internally with the original typeIDs.
We now have a clear process for getting these back onto TQ and then restoring them to everyone who owned them. Exact timescale TBC but I hope to have this wrapped up by Escalation at the latest.
Thanks again for your patience, -Greyscale
Did you fix the problem with BPO values being lost, in case this happens in future? Are a large number of new Mimirs going to be created now? And what procedures are you taking to avoid this kind of error happening twice? |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3587
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 19:05:00 -
[233] - Quote
Im sure there is a developer flag you put into the database code declaring *DO NOT REMOVE, WAS ACCICDENTALLY RELEASED ON TQ, IN POSSESION OF COLLECTORS.*
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
500
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 19:08:00 -
[234] - Quote
Thanks CCP!
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
211
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 19:27:00 -
[235] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi again,
Just finished resurrecting the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved (with fixed name) Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint
We beat the kinks out of our pipeline and these now all exist again internally with the original typeIDs.
We now have a clear process for getting these back onto TQ and then restoring them to everyone who owned them. Exact timescale TBC but I hope to have this wrapped up by Escalation at the latest.
Thanks again for your patience, -Greyscale
Thanks, but I still want my implant back. Just because I have the only one doesn't mean it was acquired illegally. There's plenty of single items that are entirely legit, such as: Luther Veron's Modified Large EMP smartbomb Makur's Modified Power Diagnostic System
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Dead Loss
Sweet Capsuleer Tears
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 20:02:00 -
[236] - Quote
What about the capsules ? |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 20:25:00 -
[237] - Quote
Dead Loss wrote:What about the capsules ? You can stock back up here Already given one to the Big C as he deserves it
|
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 20:27:00 -
[238] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi again,
Just finished resurrecting the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved (with fixed name) Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint
We beat the kinks out of our pipeline and these now all exist again internally with the original typeIDs.
We now have a clear process for getting these back onto TQ and then restoring them to everyone who owned them. Exact timescale TBC but I hope to have this wrapped up by Escalation at the latest.
Thanks again for your patience, -Greyscale Thanks... what about mine BPCs or are these covered by the BPO items? |
Shandir
Ferocious Felines
95
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:10:00 -
[239] - Quote
Entity wrote: Thanks, but I still want my implant back.
+1, unless CCP has some evidence of wrong-doing. Or exchange it for a rare item of similar value. It's not nice to take people's stuff.
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
211
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:19:00 -
[240] - Quote
Shandir wrote:Entity wrote: Thanks, but I still want my implant back.
+1, unless CCP has some evidence of wrong-doing. Or exchange it for a rare item of similar value. It's not nice to take people's stuff.
Cheers for the support.
I've already written up a nice complaint. I'm going to wait petitioning it pending a response from Greyscale, though.
Oh, and my offer to help with sorting out the invtypes table still stands, I only want to help avoid repeat incidents of this kind.
GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
|
TR4D3R4LT
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:37:00 -
[241] - Quote
Entity wrote: Thanks, but I still want my implant back. Just because I have the only one doesn't mean it was acquired illegally. There's plenty of single items that are entirely legit...
This is exactly why I pointed out why there should be checkup made on player owned features/items. If it returns 0, aka nobody has it, nobody has *never* had it, it can be removed.
However, if someone has at one point owned one, like certain unique ship lost to pvp gank, deleting it to save couple bytes is akin to going to museum and tossin stuff to trash "to clear up room." You just dont do it. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
500
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:57:00 -
[242] - Quote
Dead Loss wrote:What about the capsules ? They are still in the database today! The only ones removed were the Home types etc (you can see here, LeMonde's Capsule was the only one not in the DB at Crucible launch). My capsules were not confiscated and I know of several others that still have theirs. I'm unsure if Chribba had some of the ones that were removed. I haven't heard of a player owning any of them though.
tl;dr; - petition if capsules went missing... they can give them back right now b/c they are still in the tranq database.
|
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
212
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 12:15:00 -
[243] - Quote
page 5? really?
If only all the dramaqueens would stop drowning the threads that actually matter GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Dead Loss
Sweet Capsuleer Tears
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 15:03:00 -
[244] - Quote
Bump |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 21:22:00 -
[245] - Quote
I agree.. anything in the hands of a player should be returned to the player..
If you are going on about stuff being got through Illicit means, then why are the Tech II BPO's still out there ?
Make a consistent line in the sand, one way or another. |
TR4D3R4LT
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 04:39:00 -
[246] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:I agree.. anything in the hands of a player should be returned to the player..
If you are going on about stuff being got through Illicit means, then why are the Tech II BPO's still out there ?
Make a consistent line in the sand, one way or another.
See now you're just spewing whatever nonsense in your mind brings you. There was this thing called t2 lottery that used datacore mechanics. CCP eventually realized it was bad thing to use lottery to hand out instant moneys as that resulted in concentration (t2 bpo = money, with money you buy another t2 bpo that results in more money ad infinum.) So then we got the invention system that pretty much nerfed most t2 bpo's to be "more sensible" money makers.
However all those t2 bpo's handed out via lottery are "legal", some argue t2 bpo's handed out in gm-events are "legal" altho I've personally never seen proper proof of said t2 bpo handouts and events. T2 bpo's handed out "unofficially" (looking at T20) are *not* legal.
|
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 05:46:00 -
[247] - Quote
TR4D3R4LT wrote:See now you're just spewing whatever nonsense in your mind brings you. There was this thing called t2 lottery that used datacore mechanics. CCP eventually realized it was bad thing to use lottery to hand out instant moneys as that resulted in concentration (t2 bpo = money, with money you buy another t2 bpo that results in more money ad infinum.) So then we got the invention system that pretty much nerfed most t2 bpo's to be "more sensible" money makers.
However all those t2 bpo's handed out via lottery are "legal", some argue t2 bpo's handed out in gm-events are "legal" altho I've personally never seen proper proof of said t2 bpo handouts and events. T2 bpo's handed out "unofficially" (looking at T20) are *not* legal.
I didn't mean ALL the Tech II BPO's.. I mean the illicit ones we all know are still out there. But it was my fault for not being more specific. |
fido gotran over
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 20:44:00 -
[248] - Quote
CCP has deicided to selectivly penalize people for owning items theoretically obtained illicitly (even if the current owner obviously had nothing to do with it) and these items have no REAL effect on the game
Then CCP should be even more motivated to FIX the problem with T2 BPO for four reasons
1) Many were KNOWN to be obtained illiclty 2) The have a direct effect on a large portion of the game (unlike unusable collector items) 3) They devalue the gameplay and work done by thousands of people (unlike unusable collector items) 4) Not only is it cheaper to build with BPOs its easier because you have less steps and materials to deal with. |
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 21:06:00 -
[249] - Quote
When? |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
48
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 21:21:00 -
[250] - Quote
fido gotran over wrote:blah blah T2 BPOs blah blah
Stop trying to derail the thread -- if you have a beef with T2 BPOs start (another) thread on the subject. And no, I don't own any T2 BPOs.
|
|
Freyus Dreborne
New Eden Industrial Services
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 12:38:00 -
[251] - Quote
Well I guess its just a matter of time... |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2968
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 12:41:00 -
[252] - Quote
Hopefully Soon! I want my stuff back.
|
|
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 22:37:00 -
[253] - Quote
Hey CCP Greyscale, how are the restoration plans going? Do you have an ETA yet? |
Klezmer
In Praise Of Shadows
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 23:02:00 -
[254] - Quote
Someone contact me on Lady Spank as to the purchase of a signed copy of the pax amarria, thanks. |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars The Fonz Presidium
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 23:57:00 -
[255] - Quote
Arrs Grazznic wrote:Hey CCP Greyscale, how are the restoration plans going? Do you have an ETA yet?
When the banking crisis happened Iceland banks said they wouldnt pay out compensation to non-icelandic folk... I think Greyscale is working on the same type of system.
Take it away. Give nothing back.
In other words, up to this point, His lack of reply amounts to him spitting on you or telling you to fek off.
A lot of small game changes are happening, taking a game that works for most and trying to dumb it down for the masses is gonna backfire me thinks. Those players dont want to play in eve because it takes years to grind their way to the top... When ccp tells the elite, the hackers(collectors), and the non-grind monkeys of eve to all take a flying flip then it'll be interesting to see how long they last with the mass grinding characters. There is a reason WoW stopped publishing subscriber data, ccp wants to scoop those players and remove the loyal ones. Growth is good, unless you destroy your product in the process.
CCP should spot items that shouldn't be there within 24 hours, not after 8 years. Should we take it as a sign that they all sat on their laurels for the past 8 years and ignored all non-combat related bugs?
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1961
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 00:13:00 -
[256] - Quote
So can we get a clarification of when this stuff comes back?
Seems like its been a while since we were told they would be returned.
Issler |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
538
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 00:44:00 -
[257] - Quote
Klezmer wrote:Someone contact me on Lady Spank as to the purchase of a signed copy of the pax amarria, thanks.
I think I know of one collecting dust in an Aeon somewhere..
The longer time goes on the more disturing it is to know this (item removal) is just a knee-jerk reaction from 1-2 CCP employees. The dialogue initially was good, the silence after is not. And what really needs to be clarified as well, is whether CCP plans to keep just removing random stuff at a whim, at 1-2 peoples own discretion. Really? shiptoastin' liek a baws |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
514
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 00:48:00 -
[258] - Quote
Misanth wrote:Klezmer wrote:Someone contact me on Lady Spank as to the purchase of a signed copy of the pax amarria, thanks. I think I know of one collecting dust in an Aeon somewhere.. The longer time goes on the more disturing it is to know this (item removal) is just a knee-jerk reaction from 1-2 CCP employees. The dialogue initially was good, the silence after is not. And what really needs to be clarified as well, is whether CCP plans to keep just removing random stuff at a whim, at 1-2 peoples own discretion. Really? Emphasis added - good question... hope we get an answer on that one. ...kind of makes collecting anything unusual pointless if things are taken away arbitrarily.
|
Wolf Kruol
Capsuleer Legions Of New Eden GREATER ITAMO MAFIA
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 00:51:00 -
[259] - Quote
I still think is a mistake that CCP has removed Mines from the game. They're a great tool. CCP just needs to rethink on how it should be use for players not to exploit it too much.
I hate seeing great game features vanish because of a few bad apples.
Every time I hear CCP banning or removing stuff I feel eve dieing abit more every other day. |
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
538
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 00:53:00 -
[260] - Quote
Gogela wrote: ...kind of makes collecting anything unusual pointless if things are taken away arbitrarily.
Oh yeah thanks for the headsup.
WTS Tutorial Attack Drone, Bone Splinter, Complex Fullerene Shard Craploads of Snowball Launcher + Snowballs + a stack of all the give-away shuttles/frigates/haulers etc
Oh and ofc, I want to sell my Quafe industrial I got from this years Fanfest as obviously some kneejerk reaction from CCP will remove that too in the future!
I better get rid of my pirate and faction ships too, and maybe t2 as well hmm. Hangar clearout at my place this weekend! shiptoastin' liek a baws |
|
FluffyDice
StarFckers Inc.
124
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 01:05:00 -
[261] - Quote
Misanth wrote:Oh yeah thanks for the headsup.
WTS Tutorial Attack Drone, Bone Splinter, Complex Fullerene Shard Craploads of Snowball Launcher + Snowballs + a stack of all the give-away shuttles/frigates/haulers etc
Oh and ofc, I want to sell my Quafe industrial I got from this years Fanfest as obviously some kneejerk reaction from CCP will remove that too in the future!
I better get rid of my pirate and faction ships too, and maybe t2 as well hmm. Hangar clearout at my place this weekend! No the Quafe ship will be given out for free this christmas. |
Orator de Umbras
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 01:34:00 -
[262] - Quote
Suggestion / Idea:
In order to preserve collectable items, while also cleaning up the database and related portions of code, why not create new items, representing the old obsolete items, under a different group / marketGroup ID?
For example, the group could be called "Commodity > Collectables", and the information for the items could reflect why the items were removed from service or never used. (from a role-play perspective).
*Puts on flame resistant suit, as I know this will draw some.*
You could also tie this into 'Walking in Stations' later on, as an item that could be used to decorate your captain's quarters / hangar. |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
324
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 16:42:00 -
[263] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi again,
Just finished resurrecting the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved (with fixed name) Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint
We beat the kinks out of our pipeline and these now all exist again internally with the original typeIDs.
We now have a clear process for getting these back onto TQ and then restoring them to everyone who owned them. Exact timescale TBC but I hope to have this wrapped up by Escalation at the latest.
Thanks again for your patience, -Greyscale
How about Mining Drone -UNUSED?
As Entity said, if you are not able to restore several of the items, would you at least, be kind enough to provide some kind fo reparation for the deletion? We paid billions in ISK for these items.
Or at least be kind enough to create a simple item stating that we "owned these items," if it is too hard to restores those. |
Andrev Nox
SOMER Blink Cognitive Development
61
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 17:28:00 -
[264] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Fittings including non-existent types cause the fitting manager to fail to open properly. They were removed so that you could actually look at your fittings again. (And no, before someone suggests it, we don't want to make our code more complex and harder to maintain and therefore more likely to break just to support the handful of people who want to import invalid fittings for fun.)
I'm going to fix up the name on the Improved drone and put that on the to-replace list too. I've not heard a good argument for anything else beyond those drones and the other mentioned types, though. The capital hardwiring, for example was the *only* implant of that entire set existing on TQ, and I find it hard to believe that exactly one implant found its way into the game through wholly legitimate means. Further, in this particular case, we've deleted *all* the capital hardwirings because we didn't have any intention of releasing them any time soon. Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly means that this exact kind of problem, where we have things in the DB that appear to be in game but which nobody can remember *why* they're ingame, is more likely to happen in future. This is exactly the kind of ongoing problem that we were trying to prevent in the first place with this cleanup.
I'm late to this thread, I realize - but insinuating that this was gained illicitly without any attempt at investigating if that was truth or not is low on the professionalism scale, even by CCP's standards.
This type of blanket statement and unfounded accusation is poor form even from a player. From an employee, I find this reprehensible.
Entity is a more forgiving person than I, for not using stronger language calling you on this. Is there an avenue we can use to speak to your management about employees making this type of accusation publicly and without research? Somer Blink - The original microlottery site. |
Morph Eis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 17:54:00 -
[265] - Quote
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE |
Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
48
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 18:12:00 -
[266] - Quote
Andrev Nox wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:Fittings including non-existent types cause the fitting manager to fail to open properly. They were removed so that you could actually look at your fittings again. (And no, before someone suggests it, we don't want to make our code more complex and harder to maintain and therefore more likely to break just to support the handful of people who want to import invalid fittings for fun.)
I'm going to fix up the name on the Improved drone and put that on the to-replace list too. I've not heard a good argument for anything else beyond those drones and the other mentioned types, though. The capital hardwiring, for example was the *only* implant of that entire set existing on TQ, and I find it hard to believe that exactly one implant found its way into the game through wholly legitimate means. Further, in this particular case, we've deleted *all* the capital hardwirings because we didn't have any intention of releasing them any time soon. Leaving one of these things in the DB because some player has acquired one illicitly means that this exact kind of problem, where we have things in the DB that appear to be in game but which nobody can remember *why* they're ingame, is more likely to happen in future. This is exactly the kind of ongoing problem that we were trying to prevent in the first place with this cleanup. I'm late to this thread, I realize - but insinuating that this was gained illicitly without any attempt at investigating if that was truth or not is low on the professionalism scale, even by CCP's standards. This type of blanket statement and unfounded accusation is poor form even from a player. From an employee, I find this reprehensible. Entity is a more forgiving person than I, for not using stronger language calling you on this. Is there an avenue we can use to speak to your management about employees making this type of accusation publicly and without research?
Pretty clear to me that "gaining illicitly" is not an accusation against the acquirer, but is just descriptive about the end result of something being in the game that was not intended to be.
Don't really see what the big deal is to be honest. It was a passing molehill of a remark. The takeaway message is just that the devs are cleaning up some loose ends.
|
Markus Reese
Debitum Naturae ROMANIAN-LEGION
96
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 18:15:00 -
[267] - Quote
I should look and see if my large rigged ships are still intact (especially my phantasm) |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
517
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 19:23:00 -
[268] - Quote
Markus Reese wrote:I should look and see if my large rigged ships are still intact (especially my phantasm) I have a bunch of faction frigates with large rigs that are still fitted with them and working just fine. I do not think, however, that the large rigs in any way give you an advantage anymore. They did at one time, but have since been rebalanced making them effectively the same as their small counterparts now. What has changed is the way the game deals with ships with "bonus" fittings. In some instances I have frigs that have an extra rig (3 when they are only supposed to have two) or 2 guns and 2 launchers on a frig that has been rebalanced and can now only fit say 2 guns. While those ships are still fitted thusly, they can't undock. I get an error saying something to the effect of "Your *ship* can only fit 2 rigs but has 3" or something to that effect.
I wonder if anyone has a ship that still has a warp core... that would be a neat thing to get. Entity?
|
Markus Reese
Debitum Naturae ROMANIAN-LEGION
102
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 07:09:00 -
[269] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Markus Reese wrote:I should look and see if my large rigged ships are still intact (especially my phantasm) I have a bunch of faction frigates with large rigs that are still fitted with them and working just fine. I do not think, however, that the large rigs in any way give you an advantage anymore. They did at one time, but have since been rebalanced making them effectively the same as their small counterparts now. What has changed is the way the game deals with ships with "bonus" fittings. In some instances I have frigs that have an extra rig (3 when they are only supposed to have two) or 2 guns and 2 launchers on a frig that has been rebalanced and can now only fit say 2 guns. While those ships are still fitted thusly, they can't undock. I get an error saying something to the effect of "Your *ship* can only fit 2 rigs but has 3" or something to that effect. I wonder if anyone has a ship that still has a warp core... that would be a neat thing to get. Entity?
Since they brought out sized rigs, it has never been an advantage. Before it was rig or not rigged. All the rigs give the same bonuses. I just am not near them atm and I really don't fly them. I keep them for posterity. Back then almost nobody rigged ships. I have two of the large rigged ships for collectible. One is a phantasm, the other is a purifier. Used to have a large rigged succubus too, but I learned the hard way about the burning down the hive epic part. |
mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
152
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 22:11:00 -
[270] - Quote
Bump, I believe my mine BPOs are still missing, but please correct me if I'm wrong...
These were legitimate collectors items. I believe I could have gotten about 5B for mine if I sold them slowly over 6 months, so it sort of sucks to have them disappear :\
Hell, I remember buying them off the market 6 years ago, it's not like these were brought into the game by bugs or mistakes. I was dirt poor and it was a decent investment for me at the time but I figured they would be worth something someday... |
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
520
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 22:31:00 -
[271] - Quote
Markus Reese wrote:Gogela wrote:Markus Reese wrote:I should look and see if my large rigged ships are still intact (especially my phantasm) I have a bunch of faction frigates with large rigs that are still fitted with them and working just fine. I do not think, however, that the large rigs in any way give you an advantage anymore. They did at one time, but have since been rebalanced making them effectively the same as their small counterparts now. What has changed is the way the game deals with ships with "bonus" fittings. In some instances I have frigs that have an extra rig (3 when they are only supposed to have two) or 2 guns and 2 launchers on a frig that has been rebalanced and can now only fit say 2 guns. While those ships are still fitted thusly, they can't undock. I get an error saying something to the effect of "Your *ship* can only fit 2 rigs but has 3" or something to that effect. I wonder if anyone has a ship that still has a warp core... that would be a neat thing to get. Entity? Since they brought out sized rigs, it has never been an advantage. Before it was rig or not rigged. All the rigs give the same bonuses. I just am not near them atm and I really don't fly them. I keep them for posterity. Back then almost nobody rigged ships. I have two of the large rigged ships for collectible. One is a phantasm, the other is a purifier. Used to have a large rigged succubus too, but I learned the hard way about the burning down the hive epic part. When multiple rig sizes were added, the drawbacks to shield sig radius for large shield rigs was less than that of the small counterparts, and likewise for the propulsion rigs and their drawbacks. Now they are all the same. I don't know when it changed tbqh but I do remember there was a slight advantage initially.
|
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 11:20:00 -
[272] - Quote
Dear CCP Greyscale, you did not mention what is going to happen to Mining Drone - UNUSED. We paid billions for these drones. Please give us a response! |
Sydious
The Drunken Empire Fatal Ascension
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 11:50:00 -
[273] - Quote
Didn't he say it was coming back, but with a different name? |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
216
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 13:14:00 -
[274] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Dear CCP Greyscale, you did not mention what is going to happen to Mining Drone - UNUSED. We paid billions for these drones. Please give us a response!
l2read
Goldfish memory? GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
216
|
Posted - 2012.04.05 13:18:00 -
[275] - Quote
oops, wrong butan GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
333
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 10:19:00 -
[276] - Quote
Entity wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Dear CCP Greyscale, you did not mention what is going to happen to Mining Drone - UNUSED. We paid billions for these drones. Please give us a response! l2readGoldfish memory?
Perhaps I am being paranoid, but isn't Mining Drone - UNUSED unique in itself, and then there are Mining Drone - Improved and Mining Drone - Elite?
Or did Greyscale convert UNUSED to IMPROVED? I just finished the class on Derivatives so my head is not functioning properly. I apologize for the rebundancies. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
216
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 10:45:00 -
[277] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Entity wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Dear CCP Greyscale, you did not mention what is going to happen to Mining Drone - UNUSED. We paid billions for these drones. Please give us a response! l2readGoldfish memory? Perhaps I am being paranoid, but isn't Mining Drone - UNUSED unique in itself, and then there are Mining Drone - Improved and Mining Drone - Elite? Or did Greyscale convert UNUSED to IMPROVED? I just finished the class on Derivatives so my head is not functioning properly. I apologize for the rebundancies.
Nope. just "Elite" and "Improved - UNUSED".
There used to be a Mining Drone - Advanced too, but that type is now the Tech2 drone, iirc. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
333
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 16:58:00 -
[278] - Quote
Entity wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Entity wrote:The Antiquarian wrote:Dear CCP Greyscale, you did not mention what is going to happen to Mining Drone - UNUSED. We paid billions for these drones. Please give us a response! l2readGoldfish memory? Perhaps I am being paranoid, but isn't Mining Drone - UNUSED unique in itself, and then there are Mining Drone - Improved and Mining Drone - Elite? Or did Greyscale convert UNUSED to IMPROVED? I just finished the class on Derivatives so my head is not functioning properly. I apologize for the rebundancies. Nope. just "Elite" and "Improved - UNUSED". There used to be a Mining Drone - Advanced too, but that type is now the Tech2 drone, iirc.
Ahhhhh!!!! Yea it's been a long time since I've checked the drone. As always, much appreciated for your help!
For some reason, I thought that there were "Mining Drone - Elite/Improved/UNUSED" haha |
boomer1307
Cross Pond Inc
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 18:02:00 -
[279] - Quote
I want my Python mine BPO back...
but my large rigged ships still A O K |
Jaden Mars
Old Spice l EveBowl Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 18:24:00 -
[280] - Quote
I believe everyone [who has had their items go *poof*] has been more than patient in waiting on this to be fixed.
My suggestion is for everyone involved on this thread to PLEASE PETITION restoration of their items (and make sure that petition stays active by resubmitting under that same petition request every few days so it cannot be automatically closed).
Don't let this get swept under the rug.... make sure that it stays as a constant annoyance (as it is to us) until it is fixed.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease... |
|
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 18:34:00 -
[281] - Quote
Jaden Mars wrote:I believe everyone [who has had their items go *poof*] has been more than patient in waiting on this to be fixed.
My suggestion is for everyone involved on this thread to PLEASE PETITION restoration of their items (and make sure that petition stays active by resubmitting under that same petition request every few days so it cannot be automatically closed).
Don't let this get swept under the rug.... make sure that it stays as a constant annoyance (as it is to us) until it is fixed.
The squeaky wheel gets the grease... They have said they will be restored.. So just let it be.. It's not like the items are just removed from our hangers, they are gone from the game.. So I give them till Escalation to add them back, properly test for any bugs, etc.
Harassing GM's who have no control over any of this is a waste of your time, and theirs.. |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1154
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 10:57:00 -
[282] - Quote
Latest update:
All the resurrected types (see earlier list) have been submitted and should be re-enabled on TQ in the Escalation release.
One of our DB guys is going to be sorting out the script for returning all the missing items to their owners in the next couple of weeks. This will likely be executed a day or two *after* Escalation, to minimize deployment-related risks.
We've recovered all the Mimir BPC run data, so no "additional" Mimirs will be created as a result of this situation.
Thanks again for your patience, -Greyscale |
|
Raivi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
83
|
Posted - 2012.04.11 13:04:00 -
[283] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: We've recovered all the Mimir BPC run data, so no "additional" Mimirs will be created as a result of this situation.
|
Firsone
Deadly Alliance Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 18:31:00 -
[284] - Quote
I had a Python Mine BPO in a research job when it dissapeared. Only found out about this thread via a petition. How would that BPO be returned to me if the lab or tower is removed? where would it be placed? and would we be notified via a in game mail or something that the BPO's have been returned?
I had another Python Mine BPO on a different toon that was researched to 1000 ME and 1000 PE. I did this research to make it more unique. Would it still have that research on it or wil it change to 0 research? |
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
129
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 19:08:00 -
[285] - Quote
I'm sorry, I fail to sympathize. I understand that collectors of rare items might not want those items removed, but getting in an uproar over something like this is a bit silly. You act like it was a personal affront to you and suddenly question your ability to trust CCP with your stuff in the future. Sorry, it's just maintenance guys, they weren't personally attacking you, it just happened.
Collecting items is all well and good, but they're never going to leave game and suddenly fill your storage locker. Paying rediculous sums of ISK for them is your choice of course, but you have to have rediculous sums of ISK to start with and I gather from that fact that your real expense was limited.
Someone else gets scammed for Billions when they only have marginally more ISK to start with and says something and everybody dogpiles them and tells them to gtfo and htfu. Well, I know you're part of this, so htfu. The items that aren't supposed to be there; I hope they stay gone. A tag of unused isn't history, it's an error. Either it needs to be renamed and replaced or deleted permanently, and I really don't care which.
On the other hand, I wouldn't pay 2 billion ISK for it and I think trying to sell it to someone else for that amount is a scam. Mines are a redundant collectible too in my opinion and generally just something to scam with. I have bought these collectibles before and you know what, I couldn't sell them for a handful of ISK afterwards so I ended up dumping them in a container and tossing them on contract with 99 other items for less than 50 million ISK. Every so called 'collectible' I've purchased has resulted in this.
Frankly I don't believe any of you really hold any value to these items other than what you can convince some other player it's worth to drag their ISK out of them. Turn WiS into wIN! ..make all the characters Nude. |
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
334
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 22:12:00 -
[286] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:I'm sorry, I fail to sympathize. I understand that collectors of rare items might not want those items removed, but getting in an uproar over something like this is a bit silly. You act like it was a personal affront to you and suddenly question your ability to trust CCP with your stuff in the future. Sorry, it's just maintenance guys, they weren't personally attacking you, it just happened.
Collecting items is all well and good, but they're never going to leave game and suddenly fill your storage locker. Paying rediculous sums of ISK for them is your choice of course, but you have to have rediculous sums of ISK to start with and I gather from that fact that your real expense was limited.
Someone else gets scammed for Billions when they only have marginally more ISK to start with and says something and everybody dogpiles them and tells them to gtfo and htfu. Well, I know you're part of this, so htfu. The items that aren't supposed to be there; I hope they stay gone. A tag of unused isn't history, it's an error. Either it needs to be renamed and replaced or deleted permanently, and I really don't care which.
On the other hand, I wouldn't pay 2 billion ISK for it and I think trying to sell it to someone else for that amount is a scam. Mines are a redundant collectible too in my opinion and generally just something to scam with. I have bought these collectibles before and you know what, I couldn't sell them for a handful of ISK afterwards so I ended up dumping them in a container and tossing them on contract with 99 other items for less than 50 million ISK. Every so called 'collectible' I've purchased has resulted in this.
Frankly I don't believe any of you really hold any value to these items other than what you can convince some other player it's worth to drag their ISK out of them.
No. |
Cambarus
Baros Reloaded
151
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 22:16:00 -
[287] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:I'm sorry, I fail to sympathize. I understand that collectors of rare items might not want those items removed, but getting in an uproar over something like this is a bit silly. You act like it was a personal affront to you and suddenly question your ability to trust CCP with your stuff in the future. Sorry, it's just maintenance guys, they weren't personally attacking you, it just happened. The CCP guy who defended the removal of a bunch of items was proved to be wrong in his assumptions, and it shows that CCP puts people who don't have the experience needed in charge of things that are pretty damn important.
Mars Theran wrote: Collecting items is all well and good, but they're never going to leave game and suddenly fill your storage locker. Paying rediculous sums of ISK for them is your choice of course, but you have to have rediculous sums of ISK to start with and I gather from that fact that your real expense was limited.
The same can be said for literally everything in a video game, and it is always bullshit. Think if, instead of just items, the program deleting things had been told to assume all accounts holding them were ex-GMs/exploiters, and delete the characters in question as well. Your argument is no more and no less valid in such a situation, is it?
Mars Theran wrote: Someone else gets scammed for Billions when they only have marginally more ISK to start with and says something and everybody dogpiles them and tells them to gtfo and htfu. Well, I know you're part of this, so htfu. The items that aren't supposed to be there; I hope they stay gone. A tag of unused isn't history, it's an error. Either it needs to be renamed and replaced or deleted permanently, and I really don't care which.
I will underline this next point because of how absurdly important it is:
There is a HUGE difference between getting scammed by an eve player and getting scammed by an eve DEV.
The unused drones were already shown to be legitimately acquired, and they've been around so long that odds are most people who own them got them by spending large amounts of isk. There's no need to delete them, as they do nothing to ruin other people's gameplay, and a CCP employee deleting items because he couldn't be bothered to spend 5 minutes looking them up on google is a pretty damn good example of terrible customer service.
Mars Theran wrote: On the other hand, I wouldn't pay 2 billion ISK for it and I think trying to sell it to someone else for that amount is a scam. Mines are a redundant collectible too in my opinion and generally just something to scam with. I have bought these collectibles before and you know what, I couldn't sell them for a handful of ISK afterwards so I ended up dumping them in a container and tossing them on contract with 99 other items for less than 50 million ISK. Every so called 'collectible' I've purchased has resulted in this.
Collectible items are notoriously hard to sell, it's like that in every game. But there ARE people willing to pay more for it, specifically because most people AREN'T stupid enough to sell them well under their value. It's supply/demand, like most other things. The price goes up because while the demand is low, the supply is lower.
Mars Theran wrote: Frankly I don't believe any of you really hold any value to these items other than what you can convince some other player it's worth to drag their ISK out of them.
You can say that for literally any item in the game, barring those that only sell for their mineral costs (as determined by ship insurance payouts) and things with NPC buy orders. Since most things in this game do NOT sell for their insurance costs/NPC buy order prices, it's fairly safe to say that most items in the game cost what they do because people want to drag isk out of the guys buying things.
|
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
132
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 02:15:00 -
[288] - Quote
Actually, it has been my experience that many things just cost a lot to manufacture, either in time or ISK.
I got a little irritated earlier because this thread seemed to be filled with ISK rich players raging at the Devs and threatening to quit over the loss of what are essentially useless items. Am I wrong?
Not only that, but it was all really targeted at one Dev who stepped forward and admitted that during the course of his job he may have accidently caused the deletion of some items that weren't really supposed to be deleted and he would do what he could to return them as soon as possible. That's fine and explanation enough for me and apparently most others, but suddenly we have a lynch mob of excessively ISK rich players running about.
Really, it's a game and if there are items that were never meant to be held or owned by players in the hands of players then it is only sensible to remove them. I'm not talking about some mining drone, but other items that don't seem to have been mentioned here. No idea what they are.
The Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED may well have dropped, (hopefully without the UNUSED tag which would have indicated somebody should have reported it at the time), and be a valid game item. Fine, good for you, you had one and if you ask politely maybe you should get it back, but lets not have a dramatic scene of you torching the castle over it.
Here's what I get out of this: The Entity, professed Lord of Items raged at an EVE Dev over the loss of some items in his possesion that were effectively owned through illegitimate means then threatened to quit. Well, I have to say my respect level for the guy just dropped through the floor. How about you?
Don't persecute the Devs, they're just doing their jobs. If in the course of that process things happen that you don't like let it be known through the usual means and I'm sure-as in the past-they'll be more than happy to accomodate. No need for pitchforks and machetes I think, particularly aftrer they've already said they're working on fixing it.
Also, if it isn't intended to be in the game in players hands then there is no reason you should have it and no reason you should ever have expected to be able to keep it. Why buy it in the first place? Well, now you have owned it and can make that claim, (as can anyone else who wants to really), and I have to wonder if you got you ISKs worth.
I suppose with all the complaining you didn't but thenit's a bit like buying an F-35 and expecting the government to let you keep it in your garage even though you can't use it. Actually, that would make more sense, but I don't see how you could complain when they came and picked it up without so much as a "..by your leave." Kind of like keeping a Nuke in your basement really. Turn WiS into wIN! ..make all the characters Nude. |
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
132
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 03:14:00 -
[289] - Quote
Just considered one possible solution for the removal of unintended or unused 'priceless' items that might make everyone happy: Replace it with another priceless item.
By this I mean such an item as a unique piece of apparel of one of 3 varieties determined by the number of unique items lost and their quantity.
So, someone who loses say 20 unique items of unknown quantity, (for example Entity; though I have really no idea what he is actually missing as a result of this), gets a new Coat or some cool headgear modeled after the old Gallente stuff perhaps, someone who loses 5 unique items of unknown quantity gets some fancy T-Shirt possibly one branded with the CCP logo, and someone who loses 1 item gets something like a new cybernetic eye or earpiece.
So, based on simple numbers each item will be more common than the last, and it may be that one item is only a handful in number. That of course makes them priceless in varying degrees because really, only these people get them.
Apparel just makes sense because it is something that players can actually show off and use, and thus it has some real value as a collectible. So CCP could just make 3 -5 items of unique nature that do not effect gameplay or balance in any way and give them to those select individuals who have lost items that cannot be replaced but may have cost a great deal of time and ISK to aquire.
I say may have because I don't really believe they did. It's quite likely that players like Entity aquire these items either immediately in game or by waiting for them to show up in contracts for less than nothing, but why not just make it simple and assume they did work for them.
Heck, maybe thaey could make a T-shirt that says "I used to own an Anaconda Mine!" on the front. I'm not taking this very seriously am I? At least I came up with a possible solution though.
edit: I like this one too: All white lettering with an arrow pointing up above it - "Mining Drone - UNUSED" Turn WiS into wIN! ..make all the characters Nude. |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
51
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 08:41:00 -
[290] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:... Apparel ... I can't believe that you have suggested replacing rare and unique in-game items with Space Barbie clothes. Please leave my game.
|
|
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
335
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 15:26:00 -
[291] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Actually, it has been my experience that many things just cost a lot to manufacture, either in time or ISK.
I got a little irritated earlier because this thread seemed to be filled with ISK rich players raging at the Devs and threatening to quit over the loss of what are essentially useless items. Am I wrong?
Not only that, but it was all really targeted at one Dev who stepped forward and admitted that during the course of his job he may have accidently caused the deletion of some items that weren't really supposed to be deleted and he would do what he could to return them as soon as possible. That's fine and explanation enough for me and apparently most others, but suddenly we have a lynch mob of excessively ISK rich players running about.
Really, it's a game and if there are items that were never meant to be held or owned by players in the hands of players then it is only sensible to remove them. I'm not talking about some mining drone, but other items that don't seem to have been mentioned here. No idea what they are.
The Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED may well have dropped, (hopefully without the UNUSED tag which would have indicated somebody should have reported it at the time), and be a valid game item. Fine, good for you, you had one and if you ask politely maybe you should get it back, but lets not have a dramatic scene of you torching the castle over it.
Here's what I get out of this: The Entity, professed Lord of Items raged at an EVE Dev over the loss of some items in his possesion that were effectively owned through illegitimate means then threatened to quit. Well, I have to say my respect level for the guy just dropped through the floor. How about you?
Don't persecute the Devs, they're just doing their jobs. If in the course of that process things happen that you don't like let it be known through the usual means and I'm sure-as in the past-they'll be more than happy to accomodate. No need for pitchforks and machetes I think, particularly aftrer they've already said they're working on fixing it.
Also, if it isn't intended to be in the game in players hands then there is no reason you should have it and no reason you should ever have expected to be able to keep it. Why buy it in the first place? Well, now you have owned it and can make that claim, (as can anyone else who wants to really), and I have to wonder if you got you ISKs worth.
I suppose with all the complaining you didn't but thenit's a bit like buying an F-35 and expecting the government to let you keep it in your garage even though you can't use it. Actually, that would make more sense, but I don't see how you could complain when they came and picked it up without so much as a "..by your leave." Kind of like keeping a Nuke in your basement really.
No. No. No and no.
No one threatened with dropping subscription. Trust me. You can bet that Entity loves this game infinitely more than how much you love this game.
Entity did not acquire those items through illegitimate means. Before Entity and others corrected CCP Greyscale, CCP Greyscale initially assumed that most of the items that he deleted were acquired through illegitimate means. Now that he is corrected with proper fact, he decided to re-issue several of the items back to the players' hands.
What does this tell us? It tells us that CCP Greyscale did not place much care into checking facts and it is only because players demanded appropriate actions and gave CCP Greyscale some historical lessons and fact check, that he relented and decided to hand back the items.
Also if you refer to the property-right laws (at least in the U.S.), if a buyer makes purchase of an item acquired of illegitimate means, but without knowing the fact of its origin, the transfer is valid and the buyer gains ownership over the item. Most likely, Entity saw an item he hasn't seen (yes, capital implant) on the market and decided to buy it. If CCP decides to remove the item out of the database, then CCP should provide an appropriate compensation to Entity for the transaction costs and ISK he used to buy the implants.
I initially did not respond to your nonsensical remark about collectors trying to scam other players because such logic is almost @ a borderline-stupidity. I think you need a small lesson on basic business and economics before spitting out your nonsensical ramblings all over the wall. |
Cambarus
Baros Reloaded
152
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 15:40:00 -
[292] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Actually, it has been my experience that many things just cost a lot to manufacture, either in time or ISK.
I got a little irritated earlier because this thread seemed to be filled with ISK rich players raging at the Devs and threatening to quit over the loss of what are essentially useless items. Am I wrong? It's a game. Literally everything you own within it is useless, including your character. Some people enjoy getting killmails, others enjoy farming isk, and others still like collecting things. What exactly makes any one of those the right way to play the game, which is constantly labeled as a sandbox?
Mars Theran wrote: Not only that, but it was all really targeted at one Dev who stepped forward and admitted that during the course of his job he may have accidently caused the deletion of some items that weren't really supposed to be deleted and he would do what he could to return them as soon as possible. That's fine and explanation enough for me and apparently most others, but suddenly we have a lynch mob of excessively ISK rich players running about.
Really, it's a game and if there are items that were never meant to be held or owned by players in the hands of players then it is only sensible to remove them. I'm not talking about some mining drone, but other items that don't seem to have been mentioned here. No idea what they are.
The Mining Drone - Improved UNUSED may well have dropped, (hopefully without the UNUSED tag which would have indicated somebody should have reported it at the time), and be a valid game item. Fine, good for you, you had one and if you ask politely maybe you should get it back, but lets not have a dramatic scene of you torching the castle over it.
"If you ask politely maybe you should get it back" Would you have that same attitude if CCP deleted your account? They have every right to do that, as do any gaming company that run MMOs, are you telling me you wouldn't be upset?
Mars Theran wrote: Here's what I get out of this: The Entity, professed Lord of Items raged at an EVE Dev over the loss of some items in his possesion that were effectively owned through illegitimate means then threatened to quit. Well, I have to say my respect level for the guy just dropped through the floor. How about you?
Nope. Entity had more isk worth of items removed from him that I currently have isk. Hell, if I were to liquidate all my assets, and sell all my characters, I STILL wouldn't have enough to cover what entity lost because of a dev not double-checking his work, and I'd wager that neither would you.
Mars Theran wrote: Don't persecute the Devs, they're just doing their jobs. If in the course of that process things happen that you don't like let it be known through the usual means and I'm sure-as in the past-they'll be more than happy to accomodate. No need for pitchforks and machetes I think, particularly aftrer they've already said they're working on fixing it.
The dev in question mistakenly deleted literally hundreds of billions of items that he wasn't supposed to. Had he done the reverse, GIVING players items worth that kind of money when he shouldn't have, we'd still be hearing about it years from now (here's lookin at you T20)
I'd say that stealing items from players is notably worse than giving them out, so why then shouldn't people be upset over this dev's screw up?
Mars Theran wrote: Apparel just makes sense because it is something that players can actually show off and use, and thus it has some real value as a collectible. So CCP could just make 3 -5 items of unique nature that do not effect gameplay or balance in any way and give them to those select individuals who have lost items that cannot be replaced but may have cost a great deal of time and ISK to aquire.
How exactly do the already in-game items affect balance at all? They useless in terms of performance. You're literally suggesting ccp fix the issue of collectible items by introducing different collectible items. How is that any different/better?
|
Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
686
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 16:09:00 -
[293] - Quote
I do not know the specifics of this problem, however given forum history I am quite certain it is somehow Goonswarm's fault. |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
3183
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 17:57:00 -
[294] - Quote
Firsone wrote:I had a Python Mine BPO in a research job when it dissapeared. Only found out about this thread via a petition. How would that BPO be returned to me if the lab or tower is removed? where would it be placed? and would we be notified via a in game mail or something that the BPO's have been returned?
I had another Python Mine BPO on a different toon that was researched to 1000 ME and 1000 PE. I did this research to make it more unique. Would it still have that research on it or wil it change to 0 research? According to statement by CCP - you'll get it back as zero researched.
I'd lose research on mine too - altho I'm still waiting for mine to be returned as well...
/c
|
|
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
206
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 02:37:00 -
[295] - Quote
Xython wrote:I do not know the specifics of this problem, however given forum history I am quite certain it is somehow Goonswarm's fault.
It was probably Soundwave who distracted the Dev in charge of the DB cleanup, thereby causing him to accidentally delete these extremely useful items from the game. |
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
294
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 02:43:00 -
[296] - Quote
that stuff is gone like your sperm from last night while looking at the cam girl get over it and play the game that is now PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
109
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 03:08:00 -
[297] - Quote
This reminds me of Greyscale's arbitrary Anom nerf a year ago post-FanFest. A decision out of the blue that pissed off a ton of players and started the ball rolling with CCP's 2011 Summer of Disaster.
Pissing off subscribers who use PLEX to buy collectibles may be hitting a very small group of players, but why alienate customers in an evermore competitive MMO market space? Tanks anyone?
Like past decisions, these database changes feel like they were made in vacuum with no collaboration or checks / balances. Isn't it time that CCP reign in this nonsense? 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
24
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 03:14:00 -
[298] - Quote
I would also like to know about Capsules. They have been mentioned in the other thread, but no official comment was made.
I purchased 2 not long ago.. Transported them via an alt, and traded them to this toon. They were in my hanger. I logged off, back on, and they were gone.
Is this intentional, or just some glitch ? I've petitioned over it, but have got no response [ petition made 10 days ago ].
If no one should have these, then I should never have been able to trade for them, or transport them. If you have now decided that we shouldn't have them, then we should be compensated. Why should WE be punished for purchasing something in game, only to have you decide that people shouldn't have them anymore ?
They were introduced into the game by you, CCP. Intentional or not. They have remained in the game for all this time, with no statement saying that they are illegitimate, and may be removed. You have allowed them to remain in game, allowed people to buy and trade for them. Removing them after that with no regard for that is rather disturbing.. And would be a kick in the balls to everyone in this sandbox. |
Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
601
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 07:31:00 -
[299] - Quote
Entity wrote: Deleting player owned items = Deleting the game's legacy. Don't do it, CCP.
Master Zeuth wrote:I think I'm starting to fall in love with Greyscale. He really is working his hardest to represent CCP's desire to disconnect from their community as much as possible and destroy their existing playerbase.
I am beginning to think that CCP Greyscale just enjoys the part of EVE where he trolls other EVE players and ruins THEIR game.
He doesn't want to let people refit their ships during combat either, because he doesn't like player driven gameplay.
I find it strange that he gets this much leeway in making decisions about lore, history and gameplay without anyone above him in CCP telling him he might want to cool down his crusade against player behaviour. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |
NewGit
Distinguished Gentleman's Boating Club Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 08:27:00 -
[300] - Quote
I'm PO'd about this as well, even though it appears it is just my mine BPOs (and some mines I'd built as a lark) they stole. I paid for those items, they were legally acquired and were formerly in-game items. It's not really any different than collecting anything else (i.e. comic books, baseball cards, etc). I paid money for those things (money -> PLEX -> Isk -> Purchase), and who knows, maybe one day someone would have made me a nice offer and I could have sold them and bought something else.
I'll be keeping an eye out for the return of my stuff and hope that in the future either CCP never makes anything that will ever become "rare" again (Zephyr for example ?), or will at least have the decency to do a little fact checking first and offer compensation of some sort. |
|
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
135
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 08:59:00 -
[301] - Quote
Arrs Grazznic wrote:Mars Theran wrote:... Apparel ... I can't believe that you have suggested replacing rare and unique in-game items with Space Barbie clothes. Please leave my game.
Maybe you should have a look at Entities list then.
Collectibles are collectibles, no matter how you look at it. If your complaint is priceless, then you might want to check out the price of the limited versions of these things on the in-game market. What happens when they finish cycling through the make-quick-buck buys and resales and find their way into some collectors hangar, never to be seen again?
Still, it was just an idea. Feel free to like or dislike it as you wish of course. I still don't see any reason legitimately removed items should be returned, and I'm fine with you getting nothing for the loss of them. I believe I already said that. I also don't think you are being scammed by the Devs so much as each other and yourselves.
You tricked yourselves into thinking these items could actually be held in game and now they're gone and the game is up. Sad story but ultimately true. You never should have assumed that you would be able to keep them indefinitely and that is your own fault. Any loss you suffered for the aquisition of them is your own responsibility. Turn WiS into wIN! ..make all the characters Nude. |
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
135
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 09:34:00 -
[302] - Quote
"Mars Theran" wrote: .. stuff..
Cambarus wrote:It's a game. Literally everything you own within it is useless, including your character. Some people enjoy getting killmails, others enjoy farming isk, and others still like collecting things. What exactly makes any one of those the right way to play the game, which is constantly labeled as a sandbox?
"If you ask politely maybe you should get it back" Would you have that same attitude if CCP deleted your account? They have every right to do that, as do any gaming company that run MMOs, are you telling me you wouldn't be upset?
Nope. Entity had more isk worth of items removed from him that I currently have isk. Hell, if I were to liquidate all my assets, and sell all my characters, I STILL wouldn't have enough to cover what entity lost because of a dev not double-checking his work, and I'd wager that neither would you.
The dev in question mistakenly deleted literally hundreds of billions of items that he wasn't supposed to. Had he done the reverse, GIVING players items worth that kind of money when he shouldn't have, we'd still be hearing about it years from now (here's lookin at you T20)
I'd say that stealing items from players is notably worse than giving them out, so why then shouldn't people be upset over this dev's screw up?
How exactly do the already in-game items affect balance at all? They useless in terms of performance. You're literally suggesting ccp fix the issue of collectible items by introducing different collectible items. How is that any different/better?
I played in a sandbox once when I was a kid. Thing is, I got expelled from Kindergarten because it just so happens this sandbox had rice in it and I decided to add water to the equation.
Hmm.. that one is actually harder to answer than you might think. I would care, but at the moment I am just paying to train skills and chat on the forums, and aside from a few purchases, I haven't done anything substantial in the game for quite awhile. Either way, it isn't a particularly good comparison given there is some difference between an account and a bunch of stuff in your hangar.
Yeah, farming ISK, (at least where it pertains to RMT, exploits, and botting), is bad or haven't you been keeping up with things? Mostly nobody cares about the exploits I guess, but the other two are quite frowned upon.
Hundreds of billions you say? Good gosh, I never thought so many... neither do I care as it's likely that people will get at least some of the legitimate ones back. As stated it was ~1000 unique items, which means people were stockpiling collectibles. What is the difference between 1 example of a useless item and many?
Stealing? How does this equal stealing? They were deleted while the Devs were trying to clean up the database. I suppose you've never had the experience of trying to clean something up? Still holding copies of every e-mail you've had since the invention of them are you? Imagine trying to sort through that and delete the spam.
Given your obvious lack of enthusiasm for my suggestions and opinions, I'll assume that you weren't quite level headed when you read this. My intent wasn't to imply the lost items hurt game balance, but rather to suggest that apparel as a replacement wasn't going to affect it either.
Turn WiS into wIN! ..make all the characters Nude. |
|
ISD LoneLynx
Community Communications Liaisons
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 10:03:00 -
[303] - Quote
Minor deletions (zero-content posts removed). Please remember that the items in question were lost due to a technical fault GÇö there's no need to be uncivil towards those who are affected by it. ISD LoneLynx Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Cambarus
Baros Reloaded
157
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 18:14:00 -
[304] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:
I played in a sandbox once when I was a kid. Thing is, I got expelled from Kindergarten because it just so happens this sandbox had rice in it and I decided to add water to the equation.
Hmm.. that one is actually harder to answer than you might think. I would care, but at the moment I am just paying to train skills and chat on the forums, and aside from a few purchases, I haven't done anything substantial in the game for quite awhile. Either way, it isn't a particularly good comparison given there is some difference between an account and a bunch of stuff in your hangar.
There really isn't any notable difference between the 2, since characters can be bought for isk, meaning anything worth isk also has a value in characters/skill points. The 2 are essentially equivalent then since they can be exchanged for one another.
Mars Theran wrote: Yeah, farming ISK, (at least where it pertains to RMT, exploits, and botting), is bad or haven't you been keeping up with things? Mostly nobody cares about the exploits I guess, but the other two are quite frowned upon.
RMT, exploits, and botting are frowned upon. Regular carebearing is not.
Mars Theran wrote:Stealing? How does this equal stealing? They were deleted while the Devs were trying to clean up the database. I suppose you've never had the experience of trying to clean something up? Still holding copies of every e-mail you've had since the invention of them are you? Imagine trying to sort through that and delete the spam. Dictionary.com wrote:Steal Noun 1. to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, especially secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch. Now you could argue that CCP has the right to take things from its subscribers, but then that same logic could be applied to literally everyone in the game, as stealing is allowed according to the game rules, meaning you've a right to do it within the limits of the game. [quote=Mars Theran] Given your obvious lack of enthusiasm for my suggestions and opinions, I'll assume that you weren't quite level headed when you read this. My intent wasn't to imply the lost items hurt game balance, but rather to suggest that apparel as a replacement wasn't going to affect it either. And my reply was that if you have no problem with new items being introduced as collectible items, then there's no reason why you should have a problem with the old ones, and if you have no problem with the old ones, in what way is it unreasonable for people to get upset when CCP arbitrarily decides to delete their stuff?
Also no, your idea would be soundly rejected by anyone thinking with a level head; a t-shirt that basically reads "this is how much CCP screwed me over by deleting X billion worth of stuff from my hangar" is in no way a reasonable substitute for the items themselves. |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 19:31:00 -
[305] - Quote
ISD LoneLynx wrote:Minor deletions (zero-content posts removed). Please remember that the items in question were lost due to a technical fault GÇö there's no need to be uncivil towards those who are affected by it. I'm not saying there's any reason to be uncivil.. But your statement is in err. It was not a technical fault that removed these items, It was a deliberate action by one of the Dev's.. I doubt there was any ill intent when he did it, but regardless, it has been done, and we are just trying to get items that are rightfully ours back into our hands.
And I'm still waiting for a dev to comment on the missing capsules :/ |
Meklon
Minmatar United Freedom Front The 11th Hour Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 19:44:00 -
[306] - Quote
ISD LoneLynx wrote:Minor deletions (zero-content posts removed). Please remember that the items in question were lost due to a technical fault GÇö there's no need to be uncivil towards those who are affected by it.
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
Greyscale is a technical fault? |
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
123
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 21:01:00 -
[307] - Quote
ISD LoneLynx wrote:Minor deletions (zero-content posts removed). Please remember that the items in question were lost due to a technical fault GÇö there's no need to be uncivil towards those who are affected by it. Sony called.
They are coming to your house to remove your TV that was 100% OK because of a "technical fault".
There will be no replacement. EVE shall be purged by fire - please Gods let them ALL burn in Jita. |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
57
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 13:53:00 -
[308] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:I would also like to know about Capsules. They have been mentioned in the other thread, but no official comment was made. I purchased 2 not long ago.. Transported them via an alt, and traded them to this toon. They were in my hanger. I logged off, back on, and they were gone. Ouch, sorry to hear that. I keep mine in a station container and (just checked) they are still there. I'll send you an eve-mail shortly...
|
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
57
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 14:07:00 -
[309] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Arrs Grazznic wrote:Mars Theran wrote:... Apparel ... I can't believe that you have suggested replacing rare and unique in-game items with Space Barbie clothes. Please leave my game. ... bit bitter as wasn't around when certain (now rare and deleted items) were freely available in game ... I'm not a collector. I do not buy rare items, nor do I want WiS. Playing Space Barbie Dolls is not why I play EvE. Putting that aside I look forward to the day you log in to find some of your assets removed because a dev thought that they shouldn't be there. By your logic that will be fine.
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
614
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 14:42:00 -
[310] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:I would also like to know about Capsules. They have been mentioned in the other thread, but no official comment was made.
I purchased 2 not long ago.. Transported them via an alt, and traded them to this toon. They were in my hanger. I logged off, back on, and they were gone.
Is this intentional, or just some glitch ? I've petitioned over it, but have got no response [ petition made 10 days ago ].
If no one should have these, then I should never have been able to trade for them, or transport them. If you have now decided that we shouldn't have them, then we should be compensated. Why should WE be punished for purchasing something in game, only to have you decide that people shouldn't have them anymore ?
They were introduced into the game by you, CCP. Intentional or not. They have remained in the game for all this time, with no statement saying that they are illegitimate, and may be removed. You have allowed them to remain in game, allowed people to buy and trade for them. Removing them after that with no regard for that is rather disturbing.. And would be a kick in the balls to everyone in this sandbox. As I've said before, most of us who had capsules still have them. I still have mine in a station warehouse. Some were just auctioned off on the sell orders section of the forum. If you had them and you no longer do, you should petition it. Their removal didn't (to my knowledge) have anything to do with the database because they are still in the TQ database. I would petition it now if you are missing capsules. They can give them back to you now.
|
|
Singers
Phantom Squad Nulli Secunda
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 02:52:00 -
[311] - Quote
any one having issues with locating thair elite mining drones !?
mine has also vaporated .......
and me mine bpos and the build bpos. |
Justice Comes
Republic University Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 11:49:00 -
[312] - Quote
I'm a little disturbed at how casually they were prepared to discard the extra blueprint data. If anyone researched those, that was still time they spent not researching something else. And it was put forth like it was no big deal that they would have lost that time. If you don't value every minute of time a player pays you to play this game then you are doing it wrong. Google Chrome could not load the webpage because forums.eveonline.com took too long to respond. The website may be down, or you may be experiencing issues with your Internet connection. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
248
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 11:56:00 -
[313] - Quote
Justice Comes wrote:I'm a little disturbed at how casually they were prepared to discard the extra blueprint data. If anyone researched those, that was still time they spent not researching something else. And it was put forth like it was no big deal that they would have lost that time. If you don't value every minute of time a player pays you to play this game then you are doing it wrong.
the funny bit here is, considering they recovered the data for the mimir prints, they also have access to the data of the mine prints. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 17:51:00 -
[314] - Quote
Justice Comes wrote:I'm a little disturbed at how casually they were prepared to discard the extra blueprint data. If anyone researched those, that was still time they spent not researching something else. And it was put forth like it was no big deal that they would have lost that time. If you don't value every minute of time a player pays you to play this game then you are doing it wrong. And still waiting to hear if we'll get mine BPCs back... |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 19:37:00 -
[315] - Quote
Gogela wrote:As I've said before, most of us who had capsules still have them. I still have mine in a station warehouse. Some were just auctioned off on the sell orders section of the forum. If you had them and you no longer do, you should petition it. Their removal didn't (to my knowledge) have anything to do with the database because they are still in the TQ database. I would petition it now if you are missing capsules. They can give them back to you now. I've been involved in a Back and Forth since last night with the GM's over my Capsules.
I won't post any information about it at this time, but suffice it to say, it's apparently not as cut and dry as them just restoring them. |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
618
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 19:41:00 -
[316] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:Gogela wrote:As I've said before, most of us who had capsules still have them. I still have mine in a station warehouse. Some were just auctioned off on the sell orders section of the forum. If you had them and you no longer do, you should petition it. Their removal didn't (to my knowledge) have anything to do with the database because they are still in the TQ database. I would petition it now if you are missing capsules. They can give them back to you now. I've been involved in a Back and Forth since last night with the GM's over my Capsules. I won't post any information about it at this time, but suffice it to say, it's apparently not as cut and dry as them just restoring them. Man... what the hell is the problem CCP?
I'd definitely be interested in hearing how this turns out for you, and I'm sure a lot of other people would be too. I hope you keep us updated Sentinel Smith!
|
Justice Comes
Republic University Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.04.21 01:21:00 -
[317] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:Gogela wrote:As I've said before, most of us who had capsules still have them. I still have mine in a station warehouse. Some were just auctioned off on the sell orders section of the forum. If you had them and you no longer do, you should petition it. Their removal didn't (to my knowledge) have anything to do with the database because they are still in the TQ database. I would petition it now if you are missing capsules. They can give them back to you now. I've been involved in a Back and Forth since last night with the GM's over my Capsules. I won't post any information about it at this time, but suffice it to say, it's apparently not as cut and dry as them just restoring them.
Well if they removed the items from the database table that holds all possible items, then they can't just give you the item back (by adding corresponding records to the player inventory table). They first have to re-add it to the former. You just need someone in charge to decided that that will happen :) Google Chrome could not load the webpage because forums.eveonline.com took too long to respond. The website may be down, or you may be experiencing issues with your Internet connection. |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2012.04.21 01:56:00 -
[318] - Quote
The items in question are still in the Database, and many people still have them in their inventory. |
Entity
X-Factor Industries Synthetic Existence
248
|
Posted - 2012.04.21 10:56:00 -
[319] - Quote
Capsules are deleted by a game mechanic, not by CCP.
Switching ships while there are capsules in your ship hangar will DELETE the capsules.
If you want to keep your capsules (that is, the ones you already have). keep them in a container, ship, or corp hangar. The game won't automatically delete them there.
Please make a different thread about the capsules if you must, as they are not really relevant to this thread, which is about the items CCP deleted from the item definitions table itself. GòªGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGòæGûæGûæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòæGûæGòæGûæGòöGòùGûæGòªGòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòªGòùGòöGòù GòæGûæGòöGòùGòöGòùGòöGòúGûæGòöGòùGòáGûæGûæGòáGûæGòáGòùGòáGò¥GûæGòæGòáGûæGòáGò¥GòæGòæGòæGòÜGòù Gò¬GòÉGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòÜGò¥GûæGòÜGò¥GòæGûæGûæGòÜGò¥GòæGòæGòÜGò¥GûæGò¬GòÜGò¥GòÜGò¥GòæGûæGòæGòÜGò¥ Got Item? |
Trelaine
Dust 519
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 05:34:00 -
[320] - Quote
I just found out about this thread, I was having a heart attack thinking I'd lost my Mine bpo's.. and I just checked, I still have my "pods", which is nice, a set of them is better than none I guess. oh well, guess we'll just have to wait.
now, who has cobra and anaconda bpo's that're getting returned that I can buy a 2 run bpc (or a 1 run bpc and an actual mine) of each off? |
|
Marrano Cardosa
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 16:58:00 -
[321] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote: No. No. No and no.
No one threatened with dropping subscription. Trust me. You can bet that Entity loves this game infinitely more than how much you love this game.
Entity did not acquire those items through illegitimate means. Before Entity and others corrected CCP Greyscale, CCP Greyscale initially assumed that most of the items that he deleted were acquired through illegitimate means. Now that he is corrected with proper fact, he decided to re-issue several of the items back to the players' hands.
What does this tell us? It tells us that CCP Greyscale did not place much care into checking facts and it is only because players demanded appropriate actions and gave CCP Greyscale some historical lessons and fact check, that he relented and decided to hand back the items.
Also if you refer to the property-right laws (at least in the U.S.), if a buyer makes purchase of an item acquired of illegitimate means, but without knowing the fact of its origin, the transfer is valid and the buyer gains ownership over the item. Most likely, Entity saw an item he hasn't seen (yes, capital implant) on the market and decided to buy it. If CCP decides to remove the item out of the database, then CCP should provide an appropriate compensation to Entity for the transaction costs and ISK he used to buy the implants.
I initially did not respond to your nonsensical remark about collectors trying to scam other players because such logic is almost @ a borderline-stupidity. I think you need a small lesson on basic business and economics before spitting out your nonsensical ramblings all over the wall.
Actually, no in the US if you buy goods that turn out to be not legitimately owned by the seller, you don't become the owner and thus can't legitimately sell them. So if something was initially stolen from its owner, no matter how many hands it passes thru and even if many of those don't know it was stolen, none of them own it, and when its true status is revealed, it reverts to its actual owner. And the person in possession of it is out of luck unless he can track the transaction backwards. The authorities will not reimburse him for his costs in purchasing the illicit item. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
234
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 16:59:00 -
[322] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi,
Yes, this happened because of a thing that I did. We're looking at our options right now, but there are some other things I have to sort out first today. We'll get back to you!
-Greyscale
PS My player account owned both blueprints, I understand your pain.
All mine are gone too, I will open a petition until its replaced.
Seems now there is no reason to INVEST in COLLECATABLES in EVe.
There goes another market and reason to spend big isk on stuff. |
Marrano Cardosa
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 17:03:00 -
[323] - Quote
Jace Errata wrote:I don't own any mines or mine BPs, but it'd be pretty sad if they're all gone forever, and it's not just a temporary error. :|
Fromw what CCP has said, it was not their intent to get rid of mines and their BPs, that was accidential. The intent was to eliminate items that were never intended to be in the game at all but they ended up with a small number of false positives. |
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 17:04:00 -
[324] - Quote
Ya this isn't the real world.. In the real world the police don't have access to a DB, and would be unable to act on it at any time..Also in the real wold the police aren't the original owner/producer, and the bank, and incharge of monitoring all transactions, etc.
The fact that they ignored it this long, and allowed the items to be sold/exchanged publicly means they didn't have an issue with it. Coming back after the fact and saying WAIT.. no.. too late.
Additionally, as Entity said, several of these items were Legitimate drops/could be got through legitimate means which have just never been properly documented, or where the people who knew have left the company/forgot. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
234
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 17:04:00 -
[325] - Quote
Marrano Cardosa wrote:Jace Errata wrote:I don't own any mines or mine BPs, but it'd be pretty sad if they're all gone forever, and it's not just a temporary error. :| Fromw what CCP has said, it was not their intent to get rid of mines and their BPs, that was accidential. The intent was to eliminate items that were never intended to be in the game at all but they ended up with a small number of false positives.
Must we keep an external audit of all our stuff because of CCP's incompetence?
How do we know if we get back ALL the stuff they stole?
Shoudl we all open petitions to make sure we get them? I opened one. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
234
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 17:05:00 -
[326] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:The items in question are still in the Database, and many people still have them in their inventory.
Mine (ehm) arnt! |
Marrano Cardosa
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 17:10:00 -
[327] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Marrano Cardosa wrote:Jace Errata wrote:I don't own any mines or mine BPs, but it'd be pretty sad if they're all gone forever, and it's not just a temporary error. :| Fromw what CCP has said, it was not their intent to get rid of mines and their BPs, that was accidential. The intent was to eliminate items that were never intended to be in the game at all but they ended up with a small number of false positives. Must we keep an external audit of all our stuff because of CCP's incompetence? How do we know if we get back ALL the stuff they stole? Should we all open petitions to make sure we get them? I opened one.
Since the items missing are not in the DB (and thus essentially DO NOT EXIST) filing a petition will do nothing but annoy a GM who can do nothing to address the situation. So no, you shouldn't open a petition. Currently CCP has said they will be returned a couple of days after the next release.
They were cleaing up the DB by removing items that were never in game, while deleting in excess of 1000 items that weren't ever in game, they got false positive tests on about 13 (there is some dispute over 1 or 2 items). |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
234
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 17:13:00 -
[328] - Quote
Marrano Cardosa wrote:Miilla wrote:Marrano Cardosa wrote:Jace Errata wrote:I don't own any mines or mine BPs, but it'd be pretty sad if they're all gone forever, and it's not just a temporary error. :| Fromw what CCP has said, it was not their intent to get rid of mines and their BPs, that was accidential. The intent was to eliminate items that were never intended to be in the game at all but they ended up with a small number of false positives. Must we keep an external audit of all our stuff because of CCP's incompetence? How do we know if we get back ALL the stuff they stole? Should we all open petitions to make sure we get them? I opened one. Since the items missing are not in the DB (and thus essentially DO NOT EXIST) filing a petition will do nothing but annoy a GM who can do nothing to address the situation. So no, you shouldn't open a petition. Currently CCP has said they will be returned a couple of days after the next release. They were cleaing up the DB by removing items that were never in game, while deleting in excess of 1000 items that weren't ever in game, they got false positive tests on about 13 (there is some dispute over 1 or 2 items).
is there a way to export all Assets (including in station cans) for auditing purposes?
It seems we need this feature now too, given CCP's history of "oops". |
Ibeau Renoir
Colonial Fleet Services Independent Faction
26
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 19:01:00 -
[329] - Quote
Miilla wrote:is there a way to export all Assets (including in station cans) for auditing purposes? http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/EVE_API_Character_Asset_List
DotLAN has an asset list tool, or you can roll your own using this API call. Ceci n'est pas un sig. |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
631
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 19:41:00 -
[330] - Quote
Miilla wrote:
is there a way to export all Assets (including in station cans) for auditing purposes?
It seems we need this feature now too, given CCP's history of "oops".
Google jeveassets
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
639
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 20:53:00 -
[331] - Quote
Miilla wrote:is there a way to export all Assets (including in station cans) for auditing purposes?
It seems we need this feature now too, given CCP's history of "oops". Entity said he has a script that he runs to check asset integrity. I'm working on something now that's more of a web app that uses the api to show inventory snapshots daily... but it's going to be a while until I have adequate time to work on it. Until then I am just going to watch what Entity says because if I have it, he has it, and if anything goes missing he will probably be the first to know.
|
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
237
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 21:20:00 -
[332] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Miilla wrote:is there a way to export all Assets (including in station cans) for auditing purposes?
It seems we need this feature now too, given CCP's history of "oops". Entity said he has a script that he runs to check asset integrity. I'm working on something now that's more of a web app that uses the api to show inventory snapshots daily... but it's going to be a while until I have adequate time to work on it. Until then I am just going to watch what Entity says because if I have it, he has it, and if anything goes missing he will probably be the first to know.
I would prefer CCP give us a BUTTON on the Asset window and we can export from there, just like the other windows (market, journal etc).
So if he would be the First to know if something went missing, how come he didn't start this thread? So much for that script :) |
Shivasie
Pilots with Narcolepsy
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 00:12:00 -
[333] - Quote
So when should we have our Mines back?
I just discovered them missing when I went to drag link it to a new person so he could see what they used to look like. I was a bit and spent about an hour trying to track it down off old exported assets lists... found it, but it wasn't there. Anyway.. I'm glad they're putting them back. |
Camryn Rose
Vallkyerehub
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 13:13:00 -
[334] - Quote
"Miscellaneous
A few types which were erroneously removed from Tranquility in Crucible 1.5 have been restored, most notably the old mines and their blueprints. People who were previously in possession of these types will have them re-added to their assets over the following few days."
http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp
That day should be TODAY. Lets go CCP, I want my stuff back NOW. You've already made us all wait too long. |
Anth9rax
Shadows Of Death
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 17:19:00 -
[335] - Quote
If they are going back in game surely they sould be viewable on market, even though none are available to purchase, but no sign of them. |
Linda Shadowborn
Dark Steel Industries
105
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 19:17:00 -
[336] - Quote
still nothing... |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
241
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 19:19:00 -
[337] - Quote
WIll trade mines for a starcake :) |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1237
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 11:50:00 -
[338] - Quote
Types all exist on TQ again now
The current plan is to do the item restoration tomorrow, pending final verification. To deal with situations where the items may have been in locations that have been destroyed, we're doing the following:
-Any items owned by a player that were in a station hangar (not in a container, just on the hangar floor) will go back to where they were. -Any items owned by a player that were anywhere else (containers, ships, starbases, whatever) will be placed in the owner's home station -Any items owned by a corporation (in corp hangars, for the most part) will go to the CEO's home station (this isn't perfect, but there's no other foolproof place to put them - we especially don't want to put things that were formerly in a private hangar division into a public hangar division instead)
There's about a hundred people with outlying items in non-standard places (contracts etc) that may have trouble being recovered properly. These will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis
If you've got any questions about the process outlined in this post, please ask away! |
|
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 12:45:00 -
[339] - Quote
Good to hear \o/
Question, if you know they were in a hanger/can, why not just place them back in their exact location ?
Not that I mind, mine was in cans, but I keep my hangers clean.. but others, mainly the Corp Hangers where a CEO might not know if said items belong to "the corp" or a specific individual(s) in the corp, or otherwise where they belong, it might lead to troubles.. [ from a logic standpoint is seems simple, but of course this is software, so I doubt it is lol ]
I'm just saying.. I for one would be willing to wait a little longer to get my items back, if it was a "perfect" restore.. not like I can use the mines to blow up people during Burn Jita lol
[ though if your bored and want to activate the mines for the weekend.. I would fully support that.. ] |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1238
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 13:08:00 -
[340] - Quote
Sentinel Smith wrote:Good to hear \o/
Question, if you know they were in a hanger/can, why not just place them back in their exact location ?
Not that I mind, mine was in cans, but I keep my hangers clean.. but others, mainly the Corp Hangers where a CEO might not know if said items belong to "the corp" or a specific individual(s) in the corp, or otherwise where they belong, it might lead to troubles.. [ from a logic standpoint is seems simple, but of course this is software, so I doubt it is lol ]
I'm just saying.. I for one would be willing to wait a little longer to get my items back, if it was a "perfect" restore.. not like I can use the mines to blow up people during Burn Jita lol
[ though if your bored and want to activate the mines for the weekend.. I would fully support that.. ]
Because in all those cases, the "location" is just "a corporate hangar" or "a container", and it's highly preferable not to have to then go and look up where that hangar/container is, and then where the thing that said hangar/container is in is as well. It makes the script require more assumptions and thus be much riskier, and we'd rather go with the low-risk solution here. |
|
|
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1253
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 10:42:00 -
[341] - Quote
This is being pushed back at least another day, as the DB programmer who's doing all the heavy lifting is off sick today, and he'd prefer to be present when we do the restore to ensure that there aren't any hiccups. We obviously apologize for this unforeseen delay |
|
bucktooth
Ghost Data Eych Four Eks Zero Ahr
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 11:02:00 -
[342] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:This is being pushed back at least another day, as the DB programmer who's doing all the heavy lifting is off sick today, and he'd prefer to be present when we do the restore to ensure that there aren't any hiccups. We obviously apologize for this unforeseen delay
Nice excuse ;) |
Cutter Isaacson
Peace n Quiet
45
|
Posted - 2012.04.26 11:34:00 -
[343] - Quote
You went full r3tard, man. Never go full r3tard. |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1254
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 11:53:00 -
[344] - Quote
Hi everyone,
During downtime today, we restored 152,388 stacks of deleted items, with a total quantity of 100,032,968 units, belonging to the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint
As per my previous post: -Any items owned by a player that were in a station hangar (not in a container, just on the hangar floor) will go back to where they were. -Any items owned by a player that were anywhere else (containers, ships, starbases, whatever) will be placed in the owner's home station -Any items owned by a corporation (in corp hangars, for the most part) will go to the CEO's home station (this isn't perfect, but there's no other foolproof place to put them - we especially don't want to put things that were formerly in a private hangar division into a public hangar division instead)
145 stacks were not automatically restored, mainly due to being in contracts. If you owned one or more of these stacks, or otherwise believe that some or all of your missing items (from the above list of types) were not restored, please file a petition and Customer Support will check if you own one or more of the 145 items on the list and restore them to you
It should also be the case that all blueprint data are restored as part of this change. In particular, we've double-checked the status of all remaining Mimir blueprints and they have the correct run data.
Thanks again for your time and patience in this matter, and we apologize once again for the inconvenience caused. -Greyscale |
|
Shandir
Indigo Archive
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 13:02:00 -
[345] - Quote
Can you elaborate on which items which were owned by players were not restored? eg. Did Entity get his implant back? |
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1254
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 13:41:00 -
[346] - Quote
Shandir wrote:Can you elaborate on which items which were owned by players were not restored? eg. Did Entity get his implant back?
If it's not on the list, it's not been restored |
|
Arrs Grazznic
Poena Executive Solutions
58
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 14:32:00 -
[347] - Quote
According to EVE Assets I have my mine BPOs and BPCs back. Not sure on ME / PE settings, but happy the items are back.
|
Sentinel Smith
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 18:05:00 -
[348] - Quote
I am pleased to report that my Mines have returned :)
Thanky Much :) |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
677
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 18:10:00 -
[349] - Quote
Confirming everything has been restored. Thank you CCP Greyscale!
|
ctx2007
Wychwood and Wells
60
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 18:11:00 -
[350] - Quote
got my mines |
|
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
3312
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 18:16:00 -
[351] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Hi everyone, During downtime today, we restored 152,388 stacks of deleted items, with a total quantity of 100,032,968 units, belonging to the following types: Anaconda Mine Anaconda Mine Blueprint Asp Mine Asp Mine Blueprint Chalcopyrite Cobra Mine Cobra Mine Blueprint Hellhound I Mimir Blueprint Mining Drone - Elite Mining Drone - Improved Python Mine Python Mine Blueprint As per my previous post: -Any items owned by a player that were in a station hangar (not in a container, just on the hangar floor) will go back to where they were. -Any items owned by a player that were anywhere else (containers, ships, starbases, whatever) will be placed in the owner's home station -Any items owned by a corporation (in corp hangars, for the most part) will go to the CEO's home station (this isn't perfect, but there's no other foolproof place to put them - we especially don't want to put things that were formerly in a private hangar division into a public hangar division instead) 145 stacks were not automatically restored, mainly due to being in contracts. If you owned one or more of these stacks, or otherwise believe that some or all of your missing items (from the above list of types) were not restored, please file a petition and Customer Support will check if you own one or more of the 145 items on the list and restore them to you It should also be the case that all blueprint data are restored as part of this change. In particular, we've double-checked the status of all remaining Mimir blueprints and they have the correct run data. Thanks again for your time and patience in this matter, and we apologize once again for the inconvenience caused. -Greyscale
Well I for one is still missing my mine blueprints and they were in copr hangar... Time to petition I guess. Never mind I fail at reading.
I am very pleased to see that the blueprints have (what I think) was the correct ME/PE values.
Also, you double-checked the Mimir BPCs, does that mean they "only" got 40 runs now or the actual 1-2-3 runs that most likely was left on it?
/c
|
|
|
CCP Greyscale
C C P C C P Alliance
1255
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 12:43:00 -
[352] - Quote
Chribba wrote:[quote=CCP Greyscale] Also, you double-checked the Mimir BPCs, does that mean they "only" got 40 runs now or the actual 1-2-3 runs that most likely was left on it?
/c
100% of restored Mimir BPCs have the same number of runs at point of restoration that they did at point of deletion. |
|
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
3323
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:32:00 -
[353] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Chribba wrote:[quote=CCP Greyscale] Also, you double-checked the Mimir BPCs, does that mean they "only" got 40 runs now or the actual 1-2-3 runs that most likely was left on it?
/c 100% of restored Mimir BPCs have the same number of runs at point of restoration that they did at point of deletion. Great, thanks for confirming and thanks for restoring items.
/c
|
|
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
263
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 14:46:00 -
[354] - Quote
Yay, now,... can you make these items useful again? |
ED209X
South Park Development
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.25 09:42:00 -
[355] - Quote
Hey, I realize its kinda late, but these items aren't used very much and I just found them missing. I had, a python mine bpo and a anaconda mine bpo. and I think 100 of each mine. they are missing. I've searched my assets, and corp assets. No luck. Any ideas? Thanks |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: [one page] |