| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] [15]:: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Synapse Archae
Demonic Retribution
Un-Natural Selection
   |
Posted - 2008.09.09 05:37:00 -
[421]
Actually, I like it.
 Originally by: CCP Garthagk
While these forums may not give you everything that you want, they will usually let you post.
|
Hugh Ruka
Exploratio et Industria Morispatia
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 06:34:00 -
[422]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Hugh Ruka
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Hugh Ruka
I had a lengthy post written with arguments and such ...
Why bother ... screw the missions so I won't regret not continuing my subscription. It's the last thing still keeping me in game (but why would anybody bother, right?).
I think the Goons realy are successful with destroying the game for everybody else and some people even help them ...
So if hi-sec missions were made more entertaining but less lucrative, you'd quit? Being able to endlessly grind dull, safe, repetitive kill-missions is the only thing keeping you subscribed?
sorry, but I missed the part about making mission interesting in the OP.
Mixing in PvP dangers does not make the mission interesting ... it's still the same mission just lot more dangerous.
oh yeah, I wrote it's the last thing keeping me here ... that should imply I tried lots of other things ... seems you did not catch that ...
Seems you didn't catch that I said "entertaining", not "dangerous". Seriously, all you want to do is log in, and do the same old kill missions, lining up a bunch of completely predictable red + and popping them? Kill missions are basically space invaders on a nice 3D backdrop.
aren't we talking about making missions entertaining in a thread that starts with a complete BS suggestion to move them to lowsec with no other change ? I think this is the wrong thread for such a discussion ...
Hello YES I WANT MORE INTERESTING AND CHALLENGING MISSIONS !!! But that does not include a PvP element. Please make them long, interesting, challenging with deep story behind, some puzzles and unpredictable twists and turns ... I AM ALL FOR THIS !!!
But do not include PvP in that ... that is not my or the usual mission runners game ... If I want PvP, I can go lowsec, 0.0, wardec ... there are many options.
I am not forcing you or anybody else to run missions. Make your isk in whatever way you actualy like ... but don't try to force me to PvP ... I can do so if I choose to ...
--- SIG ---
CSM: your support is needed ! |
Kaillan Atreides
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 08:10:00 -
[423]
Signed
|
Hooded Person
|
Posted - 2008.10.10 19:13:00 -
[424]
supported - missions are broken
|
ViolenTUK
Gallente
Vindicated Exiles
|
Posted - 2008.10.11 05:06:00 -
[425]
NOT supported. Very Very Very bad idea.
www.eve-players.com |
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.10.11 08:26:00 -
[426]
|
Opertone
Caldari
SIEGE.
United Legion
|
Posted - 2008.10.11 20:49:00 -
[427]
the idea is foolish, if you move a Q20 lvl 4 agent for caldari navy into low sec, and remove all agents from hi sec... you will face 200 CNRs docking, undocking from one station
it will be a nightmare for pirates, even worse than factional war navy fleet... then carriers and dreads will get involved... Low sec will become a massive blob/smart bombing fest.
you do not want to gank CNRs with your dread, do you? actually this change will benefit neither missions runners nor pirates... it will become deathmatch... carriers vs CNRs, sneaky chinese farmers versus undock point gankers, docking game fans, bumping typhoons and that kind.
missions improvements are welcome, mission removal hardly so... it's the same as suggesting to remove all rat bounties and loot in 0.0
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] [15]:: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |