Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
If you play a high sec game and have not seen this interview, watch it, and then make plans of moving out of high sec, or quitting the game.
Instead of adapt or die, I will be considering adapt or quit
http://www.tentonhammer.com/eve-online/interviews/inferno-part-one
What Soundwave is saying is pretty much further expounding on everything that came out of Fanfest
Highlights of what he says in the interview
Datacores: If you are smart, you will cash out before Inferno. Soundwave says those words between 8:30 of the interview. He believes the datacore system is "terribly abused". Those are his words. BTW, there will be an ISK charge to get your datacores from an agent
High sec Incursions: Some kind of nerf. This has been done to death in a ton of threads, no need for comments
ALL NPC bounties: At 13:45 to 15:00, a nerf of a suggested 10% across the board, all regions. Soundwave called this the "emergency button" button. Of course, at 12:50 of the interview that 10-15% of all NPC kills came out of Drone Regions. I doubt it will be a one to one ratio, but if they nerf all NPC income by 10%, yet Drones start having bounties, will not that be a wash for null sec income, but a high sec income nerf
Mining: No direct comment on high sec mining, but it will be better as low end mins prices rise, assuming null sec mining does not crank up. Soundwave at 11:35 says 40% of the high end minerals come from the null regions. That means nothing to high sec miners, but will kill high sec industrialists who rely on their high end mins from null sec being sold in high sec
High sec transaction taxes: At 13:28, he says empitransaction cost going up, because they want to reign in the economy. This has the biggest impact of course on the high sec players
Soundwave thinks that the economy is approaching a place that is "not healthy". He has started playing Ultima Online again and he does not want the Eve economy to reach the point that Ultima's is in
Soundwave makes it clear that he wants to shake Eve to its foundations. He says, and once again a quote " I kind of hope things go terribly wrong" at 8:02 of interview. I understand he does not want to design a game for specific results (his words), but many of the changes are going to trash high sec industrial chars specifically
Guess the null sec power blocs are getting want they want Even though the power blocs are losing direct control of moon goo, the wealth of that moon goo is staying in null sec The high sec players are getting shafted as the overall potential wealth generation in high sec is lowered
This is of course what many of the null sec zealots have wanted for quite some time
I have done my time in null sec and wh's. I will not be choosing that option of joining a low sec/ null sec/ wh corp if my income gets squeezed as badly as I forsee. I will be choosing the remaining option of quitting
|
Zircon Dasher
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
TEH END IZ NYE!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Bubanni
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
178
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hi, didn't read all of what you said... but here is the thing
High sec is not suppose to be where you can earn the most isk without much risk (besides suicide ganks) anywhere els you have to be aware of who is in local either by scanning constantly for probes on scan (in wormholes) constantly checking local in 0.0... (trying to rat in systems often camped by people with covert cynos ready to hotdrop 30 bombers on your income ships)
Risky space is suppose to be worth more than high sec, regardess of who holds it (just because it's a big alliance and coalition holding a large region or ten... doesn't make it 100% safe like high sec...
So -10% income on rats in high sec is fine. it's either that or buff it everywhere els.
Incursions too... shouldn't pay much more than a lvl 4 missions in high sec... but in low sec the payout is fine as is. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
526
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
**** highsec industry tbh |
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
377
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Meh, I already have plans to dive into a WH.
Fly Safe, Die Hard
|
Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2177
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Once we make it impossible to place a POS in highsec this game will get interesting again. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
182
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
You have pretty much condensed it to where it is going, OP.
High sec is going to become unplayable. "Be afraid" you say. Who? 10 years now, CCP have tried, tried and failed to herd the masses to null sec. You said so yourself. Most will just quit.
Who should be afraid here? |
Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bubanni wrote:Hi, didn't read all of what you said... but here is the thing
High sec is not suppose to be where you can earn the most isk without much risk (besides suicide ganks) anywhere els you have to be aware of who is in local either by scanning constantly for probes on scan (in wormholes) constantly checking local in 0.0... (trying to rat in systems often camped by people with covert cynos ready to hotdrop 30 bombers on your income ships)
Risky space is suppose to be worth more than high sec, regardess of who holds it (just because it's a big alliance and coalition holding a large region or ten... doesn't make it 100% safe like high sec...
So -10% income on rats in high sec is fine. it's either that or buff it everywhere els.
Incursions too... shouldn't pay much more than a lvl 4 missions in high sec... but in low sec the payout is fine as is.
Who said anything about making as much as in null sec. I agree that risk should be balanced with return. But I have lived in wh space and null sec, and know how much I made there compared to how much I make in high sec. I made oodles more in null, which I am fine with.
But I expect the ability to actually maintain a quiet lifestyle in high sec. If these changes come down the pipe, high sec will be wiped out for me.
|
baltec1
860
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
I have spent the last 6 months building a high sec indudstrial company. Nothing said so far will stop me and my empire from growing. |
Xioden Acap
White Whales
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Prices will adjust and things will continue as usual. Not really much to see here. |
|
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
526
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Skydell wrote: You said so yourself. Most will just quit. lol everytime EVE has expanded warfare and pvp subs went up, when they put in expansions that introduced nothing but risk-free highsec carebear money machines like Incursion, Tyrannis and Incarna, CCP almost died. |
Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Once we make it impossible to place a POS in highsec this game will get interesting again.
When you say "we", do you mean the CSM? Interesting that a goon not on the CSM talks about having influence to move CCP in a direction. |
Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
185
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
As a player for whom highsec is extremely relevant, I approve of pretty much all these changes. |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
2892
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
Mommy?
|
|
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
Xioden Acap wrote:Prices will adjust and things will continue as usual. Not really much to see here. Same thing happened with PI. Yeah, nothing to panic over. I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
182
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 06:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Skydell wrote: You said so yourself. Most will just quit. lol everytime EVE has expanded warfare and pvp subs went up, when they put in expansions that introduced nothing but risk-free highsec carebear money machines like Incursion, Tyrannis and Incarna, CCP almost died. CSM elections by the player base, CCP market research and even advertisements all agree on what type of content is drawing new players into EVE, and it isn't some sort of gay concord-protected decshielded station docking bullshit
You have converted me, I'm a full supporter of carebearless EVE. Nuke High Sec. We need to bring in the new and improved PvP EVE.
Been saying that for years. Lets see it happen. Lets stop with all the smack talk CCP. You want HTFU EVE. Do it. Show some spine. |
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
437
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:02:00 -
[17] - Quote
Skydell wrote:You have pretty much condensed it to where it is going, OP.
High sec is going to become unplayable. "Be afraid" you say. Who? 10 years now, CCP have tried, tried and failed to herd the masses to null sec. You said so yourself. Most will just quit.
Who should be afraid here?
Yes indeed, one CCP person making such statements as has been done has not considered the serious long term repurcussions.
Be Afraid ? I would say it's very much like commercial suicide on CCP's behalf.
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |
baltec1
860
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Skydell wrote:You have pretty much condensed it to where it is going, OP.
High sec is going to become unplayable. "Be afraid" you say. Who? 10 years now, CCP have tried, tried and failed to herd the masses to null sec. You said so yourself. Most will just quit.
Who should be afraid here? Yes indeed, one CCP person making such statements as has been done has not considered the serious long term repurcussions. Be Afraid ? I would say it's very much like commercial suicide on CCP's behalf. BAAAWWW |
Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:09:00 -
[19] - Quote
To all the null sec zealots, I am certain that all these changes provide you with immense glee. But if you notice the title of the thread, it was not addressed to you.
You laugh now. You will continue to laugh as the high sec tears spread. I imagine you will continue to laugh into the early / mid fall, until CCP announces there is a drop in subscriptions.
I am looking forward to how people that have a raft of subs with chars focused on datacore production will find a way to justify keeping their accounts open. Some fellow posted in the industry forum he has quite a few accounts designed primarily for datacore farming. How many accounts pray tell will he need / feasibly run in low sec FW to get those same datacores?
And when some high sec mission runner sees his income nerfed 10%, I am sure he will have no problem just playing 10% more to gain the same income.
And when some industrialist who hates null is getting murdered trying to compete with null sec industrialists, no problem there. I am sure he will have a complete change of heart and join goons.
Plus all those incursion runner who opened up new accounts because of the income that they got from Vanguards, I am certain they will keep those accounts open.
But hey, it's OK. You zealots do your happy dance now.
It will be interesting to see if CCP is doing a happy dance as well say around October. |
Fierceshot
Fierce Recon
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:16:00 -
[20] - Quote
CCP balancing a broken game?!? This is an OUTRAGE!! |
|
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
527
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:19:00 -
[21] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:To all the null sec zealots, I am certain that all these changes provide you with immense glee. But if you notice the title of the thread, it was not addressed to you.
You laugh now. You will continue to laugh as the high sec tears spread. I imagine you will continue to laugh into the early / mid fall, until CCP announces there is a drop in subscriptions.. subs only drop when highsec is catered to, see incursion and tyrannis
hth |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
527
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:21:00 -
[22] - Quote
hey anyone reading this i have a noctis tackled in NIZJ-0 in esoteria but my anathema can't crack the noctis' passive shield regen
someone plz help i will fleet u and you can warp to this anom and we will share this km : twisted: |
mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
144
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Risk vs reward is what this game was founded on, and it's broken, way broken. High sec income needs to drop by 1/2 across the board, or content needs to be revamped to actually be difficult (lvl4s for example were created before rigs or T3 BSs were released). |
Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics Bringers of Death.
645
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:27:00 -
[24] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: subs only drop when highsec is catered to, see incursion and tyrannis
hth
That's not entirely right. The problem is that those expansion were all around ****, not that they catered to high sec. I'm pretty sure high sec dwellers don't enjoy moving dots around on a planet any more than I do. |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
316
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:28:00 -
[25] - Quote
I <3 Soundwave!
Vince Snetterton wrote: Datacores: If you are smart, you will cash out before Inferno. Soundwave says those words between 8:30 of the interview. He believes the datacore system is "terribly abused". Those are his words. BTW, there will be an ISK charge to get your datacores from an agent
This is the only passive income in EVE, it's also perfectly safe and needs to be fixed. Good!
Quote:High sec Incursions: Some kind of nerf. This has been done to death in a ton of threads, no need for comments
Even Incursion-runners agree that they need balancing, everybody thinks this is... Good!
Quote:ALL NPC bounties: At 13:45 to 15:00, a nerf of a suggested 10% across the board, all regions. Soundwave called this the "emergency button" button. Of course, at 12:50 of the interview that 10-15% of all NPC kills came out of Drone Regions. I doubt it will be a one to one ratio, but if they nerf all NPC income by 10%, yet Drones start having bounties, will not that be a wash for null sec income, but a high sec income nerf.
Mining: No direct comment on high sec mining, but it will be better as low end mins prices rise, assuming null sec mining does not crank up. Soundwave at 11:35 says 40% of the high end minerals come from the null regions. That means nothing to high sec miners, but will kill high sec industrialists who rely on their high end mins from null sec being sold in high sec
There are drones also in hisec, just FYI. Anyway hisec income really needs to be nerfed to the ground, spirit of EVE is to reward those who carve out their own space, co-operate to maintain and improve it and command their own destiny, not those who rely on NPC mechanisms for their protection.
This is really the best thing that could happen to EVE economy. There has been a massive power creep caused by higher income levels across the board, and the abundant supply of artficially low-priced minerals from botting in Drone Regions. This is a huge factor affecting PVP, ship losses are irrelevant, you see pirate ships and T3s in addition to battlecruisers and battleships, which are considered disposable. Good!
Quote:High sec transaction taxes: At 13:28, he says empitransaction cost going up, because they want to reign in the economy. This has the biggest impact of course on the high sec players
By far the most transactions happen in hisec, and this inludes absolutely everyone in EVE. Trade happens in the hubs, not in low, null or wspace - this has therefore the biggest impact on all of us, and is a much needed ISK sink. Good!
Quote:Soundwave makes it clear that he wants to shake Eve to its foundations. He says, and once again a quote " I kind of hope things go terribly wrong" at 8:02 of interview. I understand he does not want to design a game for specific results (his words), but many of the changes are going to trash high sec industrial chars specifically
In real economies, **** happens every now and then due to their open and chaotic nature. Power blocs fall, new opportunities and threats emerge. Some get rich, some poor. In a closed, virtual economy like EVE, this needs to be simulated. I find it refreshing and really hope for a massive depression - good!
Easy on the tinfoil, bud. This is good for the game, for everybody- with some thinking and right attitude, these changes can make you rich. |
Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
182
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:29:00 -
[26] - Quote
it's really rather amusing, all this peanut gallery gibberish. Most of the people talking out of thier ass don't know or care to know the history of EVE.
There was a time there was no Concord and EVE was the wild west of MMO's with "HTFU EVE" mantra ruling the skies of New Eden. They alos couldn't break 5K subs with that model and soon changed it. Since that time, CCP stopped being an Inde corp and became a larger entity with debt to reflect it. If they killed carbear in EVE I would put money on it, EVE would drop to max 30K Subs with 6K login (like it used to be not that many years ago) and with CCP's current debt, the company would bankrupt. A company that is 10 years old is not old, it's a new company. A company that went from 75K revenue to 6 million revenue a month in 10 years is what is known to investors as a bubble.
EVE is not a l33tboi PvP bear game. EVE is a sandbox. It is Industry, it is exploration, it is PvE, it is PvP, it is mining, manufacturing, it is many, many things and you can smack talk all you want but the fact is, EVE needs all its players. It needs them all to feel achieved and it needs them to be having fun.
Or It Dies. |
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
203
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:32:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:...
I live in High Sec and approve of all those things. I especially like that CCP Soundwave played a bit of UO again, perhaps it reminded him of where EVE came from. He should give CCP Greyscale some free time at work to play other Sandbox MMOs as well, might help with his ideas for Crimewatch.
|
Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2179
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:33:00 -
[28] - Quote
Skydell wrote:If they killed carbear in EVE I would put money on it, EVE would drop to max 30K Subs with 6K login (like it used to be not that many years ago) and with CCP's current debt, the company would bankrupt.
I bet the population that experiences the most amount of churn is people who never leave high sec. CCP is just trying to allow carebears to experience the fun the rest of us are having. People who do nothing but mine or run missions must be miserable. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
527
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:33:00 -
[29] - Quote
Skydell wrote:it's really rather amusing, all this peanut gallery gibberish. Most of the people talking out of thier ass don't know or care to know the history of EVE.. here allow me
unprecedented steady growth and retention of users in a fickle MMO market for nearly 10 years until highsec-exclusive, anti-PVP expansions were ushered in, bringing about the summer of rage until CCP wisened up and started making PVP-related expansions again |
Iggep
Crestlighter Heavy Industries
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:37:00 -
[30] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:To all the null sec zealots, I am certain that all these changes provide you with immense glee. But if you notice the title of the thread, it was not addressed to you.
You laugh now. You will continue to laugh as the high sec tears spread. I imagine you will continue to laugh into the early / mid fall, until CCP announces there is a drop in subscriptions.
I am looking forward to how people that have a raft of subs with chars focused on datacore production will find a way to justify keeping their accounts open. Some fellow posted in the industry forum he has quite a few accounts designed primarily for datacore farming. How many accounts pray tell will he need / feasibly run in low sec FW to get those same datacores?
And when some high sec mission runner sees his income nerfed 10%, I am sure he will have no problem just playing 10% more to gain the same income.
And when some industrialist who hates null is getting murdered trying to compete with null sec industrialists, no problem there. I am sure he will have a complete change of heart and join goons.
Plus all those incursion runner who opened up new accounts because of the income that they got from Vanguards, I am certain they will keep those accounts open.
But hey, it's OK. You zealots do your happy dance now.
It will be interesting to see if CCP is doing a happy dance as well say around October.
It strikes me that the thing that is not really being talked about is botting and the impact its actually had on the EVE economy. It seems to me that a hammer is being used to swat a rather pesky "fly" when what is really needed is for CCP to eradicate the botting problem. How many stories do we need to read of alliances basing their Cap fleets and ship replacement programs on the back of botting before botting is actually taken seriously by CCP? CCP already said that incursions aren't anywhere near the main faucet in the economy, bounties are. So run daily reports (I'd be shocked if they didn't already!) to see which accounts are in the top 10-20% of bounty earnings and dig into them. White list those accounts which are clearly not bots, and start banning the others. Ban the IPs and proxy addresses and over time you take care of a lot of this without having to make very many changes overall.
An annual ban wave is not sufficient, to mollify the wishes of the player base or for the economy clearly. More emphasis needs to be made -- strong, sustained emphasis.
http://www.iggepsrealm.com - the ramblings of a spaceship driving techophile |
|
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
Also, RE: high-sec transaction tax, have a listen again because it sounds like it will rise but also be offset more by skill. You could see a situation where having good trade skills gives you roughly the same tax as now. Honestly, this is just cherry-picking doom and gloom panic. OP should chill, smoke a blunt, and see what happens. I'm ******* terrible at EVE.
"Fun fact: carebears are not necessary for the game to function." --áTippia |
Bubanni
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
179
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vince, I should say I have no gain or loss in this matter at all, as I have no income at all, I do no missions, I don't rat, I don't do incursions, I have no industry.... I used to be a 0.0 carebear, doing anomalies and complexes... I am not super rich, but for the last 6+ months I been surviving and having fun on just a mere 3bil (sometimes getting ships for free, sometimes killing stuff that gave some nice loot, maintaining the isk)
all I do is PvP... so here is the question... WHY? why do all these high sec carebears complain about "nerfing" their income? when they hardly lose much isk when they don't pvp... they want more isk to grow faster? to buy that 10bil ratting ship? (or in some cases earn isk for their 0.0 pvp(in which case they should be earning it in 0.0)?...
Point is... the goal in EVE isn't only to earn isk... it's to have fun. (and it doesn't take that much isk to have fun) |
Iggep
Crestlighter Heavy Industries
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:40:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Skydell wrote:If they killed carbear in EVE I would put money on it, EVE would drop to max 30K Subs with 6K login (like it used to be not that many years ago) and with CCP's current debt, the company would bankrupt. I bet the population that experiences the most amount of churn is people who never leave high sec. CCP is just trying to allow carebears to experience the fun the rest of us are having. People who do nothing but mine or run missions must be miserable.
I can vouch for that in my case. Can't wait to get back out to nullsec personally. Started a new account a few weeks ago just for that purpose. Logistics is the route he's going and when he's ready I'll be headed back out to null to enjoy the fighting again. My other accounts will stay in high to do the other things I like to do in EVE. http://www.iggepsrealm.com - the ramblings of a spaceship driving techophile |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
527
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 07:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
okay after shooting the noctis with 12 dps for half an hour with half a dozen enemy tengus in local i have decided to disengage before i run out of barrage S |
Lexmana
Imperial Stout
270
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:03:00 -
[35] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Yes indeed, one CCP person making such statements as has been done has not considered the serious long term repurcussions.
Be Afraid ? I would say it's very much like commercial suicide on CCP's behalf.
Haha, their marketing people seem to think quite the opposite. David Reid, CCPs new Chief Marketing Officer, was very clear on how they wanted to market EVE. It was to tell the player's stories and things like Murder Inc. and the Goonswarm recruitment scam. There was nothing carebear at all in his presentation of EVE. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
243
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kind of gutted as i have just sunk some sp into research agent related skills but whatever, game balances are to be expected. |
Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
183
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:27:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Skydell wrote:If they killed carbear in EVE I would put money on it, EVE would drop to max 30K Subs with 6K login (like it used to be not that many years ago) and with CCP's current debt, the company would bankrupt. I bet the population that experiences the most amount of churn is people who never leave high sec. CCP is just trying to allow carebears to experience the fun the rest of us are having. People who do nothing but mine or run missions must be miserable.
That's snake oil propaganda that's only usefull in the forum wars.
Every single account holder in EVE over 6 months old has been to null and was greeted by a wall of excuses from tinfoil hat null bloc's that had every right to be paranoid because of the huge impact Meta has on a broken permissions system. We all went there with billions, got sold a bill of goods and ended back in high sec farming missions to replace our ships. |
Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
183
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Skydell wrote:it's really rather amusing, all this peanut gallery gibberish. Most of the people talking out of thier ass don't know or care to know the history of EVE.. here allow me unprecedented steady growth and retention of users in a fickle MMO market for nearly 10 years until highsec-exclusive, anti-PVP expansions were ushered in, bringing about the summer of rage until CCP wisened up and started making PVP-related expansions again threats of 'put highsec in pvp and watch us all leave' made by idiots were exposed as nothing but hot air, with all evidence pointing to the exact opposite
Based on false assumptions, forum claims and pure propaganda. You know it, I know it, CCP knows it. |
Bubanni
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
180
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:38:00 -
[39] - Quote
Skydell wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Skydell wrote:If they killed carbear in EVE I would put money on it, EVE would drop to max 30K Subs with 6K login (like it used to be not that many years ago) and with CCP's current debt, the company would bankrupt. I bet the population that experiences the most amount of churn is people who never leave high sec. CCP is just trying to allow carebears to experience the fun the rest of us are having. People who do nothing but mine or run missions must be miserable. That's snake oil propaganda that's only usefull in the forum wars. Every single account holder in EVE over 6 months old has been to null and was greeted by a wall of excuses from tinfoil hat null bloc's that had every right to be paranoid because of the huge impact Meta has on a broken permissions system. We all went there with billions, got sold a bill of goods and ended back in high sec farming missions to replace our ships.
:D I find enjoyment in lossing my ships in stupid ways, in siturations where I know theres a very very good chance of my death. Last week I was scouting for a fleet, as I jump into a gang of about 6+ cynabals 3+ vagabonds a rapier and a curse, and some other nice stuff, I was in a stiletto and I told my fleet I was sure I was going to die now :D my addrenalin was pumping because of the imminent death I was facing, I knew I had a chance to make it back to the gate unless they were fast enough at locking, webbing/scramming..., and even then there was a chance they could alpha me with all those high tracking cynabals and vagabonds....
:P I gate crashed! with only 5% damage taken to my shields and no cap left lol, and this is why I love eve.... you never know whats on the other side of the gate, but often gate crashing is your best chance of survival...
Short story brought to you by Bubanni the Carebear
|
Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
198
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:39:00 -
[40] - Quote
It's pretty easy: nerf highsec to being just a place to be safely afk the subscription numbers will tell CCP if it was a good idea or not. I don't care any more though I like highsec(except incursions) as it is.
Let judgement day come. Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing. |
|
ivar R'dhak
STK Scientific
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Too much "sky-is-falling" in OP.
Bottom line of that interview: Soundwave played some UO, got scared called up his aunty to move to bell-air.
With the coming Drone region bounties they simply NEED to nerf all other bounties, simple as that.
I-¦d much more liked it if at least the low-sec bounties would stay the same as an incentive, but I think bounty nerfing isn-¦t done by a long run. Sadly, as it-¦s completely the wrong route IMHO. We need more isk SINKS not less faucets, although those too. But balanced much more carefully. 10% is a good compromise for now.
What-¦s REALLY getting my goat is that TECH isn-¦t nerfed AT ALL!
Well CCP is done with ignoring EVE Space for sure. Guess be careful what you wish for, eh? |
Xearal
SOL Industries Black Thorne Alliance
272
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:50:00 -
[42] - Quote
As nobody asked.. Your Stuffs, I can haz?
Anyway.. I-¦m an industrialist, and I-¦m not worried, it-¦s called adapting. Don-¦t be afraid of the big bad null-sec boogeyman, don-¦t be afraid of the scary no-concord low sec zones, if you want more advice, when you log back into eve, have it play the intro movie again, it has some really important wisdom that counts in eve in there.
Your ability to be successful is based on your ability to be bold, dare to be bold, pilot.
Edit: Ivar, they ARE nerfing moongoo atm machines. The nerf isn-¦t a direct nerf though, it-¦s a very good roundabout way of nerfing it, called Ring Mining, there will be mineable moongoo minerals in the (near?) future. |
Arcathra
Technodyne Ltd.
200
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:56:00 -
[43] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:If you play a high sec game and have not seen this interview, watch it, and then make plans of moving out of high sec, or quitting the game. Instead of adapt or die, I will be considering adapt or quit http://www.tentonhammer.com/eve-online/interviews/inferno-part-oneWhat Soundwave is saying is pretty much further expounding on everything that came out of Fanfest Highlights of what he says in the interview Datacores: If you are smart, you will cash out before Inferno. Soundwave says those words between 8:30 of the interview. He believes the datacore system is "terribly abused". Those are his words. BTW, there will be an ISK charge to get your datacores from an agent High sec Incursions: Some kind of nerf. This has been done to death in a ton of threads, no need for comments ALL NPC bounties: At 13:45 to 15:00, a nerf of a suggested 10% across the board, all regions. Soundwave called this the "emergency button" button. Of course, at 12:50 of the interview that 10-15% of all NPC kills came out of Drone Regions. I doubt it will be a one to one ratio, but if they nerf all NPC income by 10%, yet Drones start having bounties, will not that be a wash for null sec income, but a high sec income nerf Mining: No direct comment on high sec mining, but it will be better as low end mins prices rise, assuming null sec mining does not crank up. Soundwave at 11:35 says 40% of the high end minerals come from the null regions. That means nothing to high sec miners, but will kill high sec industrialists who rely on their high end mins from null sec being sold in high sec High sec transaction taxes: At 13:28, he says empitransaction cost going up, because they want to reign in the economy. This has the biggest impact of course on the high sec players Soundwave thinks that the economy is approaching a place that is "not healthy". He has started playing Ultima Online again and he does not want the Eve economy to reach the point that Ultima's is in Soundwave makes it clear that he wants to shake Eve to its foundations. He says, and once again a quote " I kind of hope things go terribly wrong" at 8:02 of interview. I understand he does not want to design a game for specific results (his words), but many of the changes are going to trash high sec industrial chars specifically Guess the null sec power blocs are getting want they want Even though the power blocs are losing direct control of moon goo, the wealth of that moon goo is staying in null sec The high sec players are getting shafted as the overall potential wealth generation in high sec is lowered This is of course what many of the null sec zealots have wanted for quite some time I have done my time in null sec and wh's. I will not be choosing that option of joining a low sec/ null sec/ wh corp if my income gets squeezed as badly as I forsee. I will be choosing the remaining option of quitting And what of those points exactly should make me afraid?
Datacores are no big deal. I think Soundwave talked at the Fanfest about some other sources for them, don't remember exactly what it was...
The incursion "nerf" was expected and I think it is okay. Not everyone in High-Sec is doing incursions for a living and people survived before they were introduced.
Bounty reduction? Great. I always thought that those bounties where way too high. But you do realise that this will have an impact to the precious anomalies in 0.0 too? Guess who will be whining more about this... (Hint: anomaly "nerf").
Mining... I also don't see any problem here. So 40% of high-end minerals come from 0.0? How surprising. I can get my high-end minerals today, why shouldn't I get them tomorrow? Have you seen the new Ring Mining idea by CCP that was introduced by Soundwave?
Transaction tax. Yeah, and now what? I don't see that they plan to increase them massivly. There has to be some additional ISK sink and some % more doesn't hurt anyone.
So, tell me again of what I should be afraid exactly? I don't see any gamebreaking things happining to high-sec after reading your points. |
Luh Windan
S T R A T C O M Persona Non Gratis
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:56:00 -
[44] - Quote
You have to feel for CCP - on one hand there a people screaming for everything to be nerfed because the economy is in made inflation etc. and on the other there are a whole ton of people who will be screaming and rage quiting if they change *anything*
To the OP - all the drama about null and end of the world really doesn't help get your point across. Now I live in null I can't help finding highsec'ers nonsense about null hilarious. You do realise that these aren't super politicians deviously manipulating the world? - quite frankly null politics is like listening to my small children bickering half the time.
The only new piece of information here is that CCP think that the economy needs reigning in - and so yes we are going to see some big changes I image. Isk will be harder to earn all over eve and I have no doubt that some of the lovely shinies we are all happily flying will suddenly seem really expensive but it will not be the end of the world - because changing the economy means big changes all over - there will be a new reality with industry and other things adapting and changing and not just the same one where we are all poorer. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
528
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 08:59:00 -
[45] - Quote
yeah some highsec guys realize that EVE's PVE is boring and sucks and is grindy and that the only real entertainment value one gets from it is by overcoming adversity created by other players. but highsec's risk/reward aspect is so screwed up that one has to deliberately gimp themselves to put themselves in any of that entertaining adversity, reaching the point where 'living in null/low' is considered a 'deliberate gimp'
others just have some sort of pavlovian response to a wallet blink and get defensive |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3404
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:00:00 -
[46] - Quote
fixing the broken risk/reward balance is bad?
lol "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Endeavour Starfleet
730
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:04:00 -
[47] - Quote
I don't believe CCP is dumb enough to stomp on hisec players that hard. Especially after the many nerfs the players have already experienced
However I will say this much tho
I know how to live in nullsec. I know how to avoid camps. Make funds. PVP, Use intel, do corp tasks and even some corp admin work at an early part of my experience in the game. I have lost a single destroyer to AFK cloakers and a few low end ships to roamers while my corpmates lost navy battleships
By all intents and purposes I should be good to go when it comes to Nullsec right? I should be happy as a clam and rolling in the fun
I left nullsec..
I left it because it is a load of dog crap that rewards good ole boys and large alliances over small dedicated ones. Where asking for invasive Full API keys is now normal due to absurdly broken corp and POS mechanics. Where new players get shunned as potential spies due to said mechanics. Where FCs feel free to call kitchen sink CTAs and say "Don't like mah CTA? GTFO of Corp or log off" Where corps feel free to say "Don't report blue bots" Where major RMT operations run. Where lazy ass renters gather and never bother to read on the future of EVE much less care
And to be frank CCP It looks like you have barely just stated on this mountain of crap. Corp and POS fixes in 2013? They should have been planned with Inferno instead of shiny new (and will be abused) wardec system. Nothing about AFK cloaking?
I am not going back to nullsec until it is fixed. And yes that means I will sooner quit EVE after hisec sledgehammer nerfs hit than go back to null not having fun. The threat of members going back to hisec content is about the only thing keeping member abuse in check and once that is gone I will have better things to do than support a broken game by that point. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:09:00 -
[48] - Quote
"my corp wasn't happy with me doing nothing but ratting a bloo bloo bloo" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
528
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:10:00 -
[49] - Quote
tl;dr - endeavor starfleet once joined some crappy nullsec renters because they're the only ones that would take in his equally worthless main before getting run back to highsec because it was full of quitters just like him who gave up at the first sign of adversity
lol full api key to rent space, where does he think of this ****? |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:11:00 -
[50] - Quote
"nerf nullsec there's too much isk coming in from bounties even though the average anom runner won't pull more than 60m ISK/hour, incursions aren't a problem i'm only pulling 100m/hour with the protection of instakill scripts" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:12:00 -
[51] - Quote
BOTS "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
there's too many bots in nullsec! all of them are there nobody bots in highsec they just run their missions very enthusiastically "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Chokichi Ozuwara
Lucky Dragon Convenience
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:13:00 -
[53] - Quote
I see this differently. The days of catering to Goons and null alliances are going to come to an end. It's not in the longterm commercial interest of CCP to promote a game where player on player scams and disrespect are the norm. Kill NPCs until you're blue in the face, but stuff like the Mittani hassling another player towards a suicide are bad for business, regardless of where people fall on the morality of the whole thing.
If you're playing Eve today and you're not on board with the future, which is WiS, Avatars, paid customization and more hisec consensual content (FW, War Decs, etc) then your days are probably somewhat numbered, because it is a lot more work for CCP to cater to the 8 or 10 year old player than it is to cater to the one week old newbie.
I am not saying I agree with any of this, but if I am running CCP like a business, I kiss Mittani ass today, and figure out a way to get out of this devil's bargain with certain nullsec powerblocks in the future. Start a corp and do it yourself. You'll fail, but you'll enjoy failing. Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |
Bubanni
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
181
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
Did you guys know its really easy to "ninja rat" in null sec? and you don't need to be in a coalition? that doing missions in low sec is very safe, specially if you find a low populated low sec system... just have scanner open if someone enters the system and scan for probes (it also gives better bounty/lp reward, and if the mission sends you to next door systems you can choose to reject them if your worried, or have an alt to scout :) (or use a ship thats agile enough to gate crash or warp before most ships can catch it (fit a cloak and do cloaky mwd warp trick) |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
528
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:15:00 -
[55] - Quote
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:If you're playing Eve today and you're not on board with the future, which is WiS, Avatars, paid customization and more hisec consensual content (FW, War Decs, etc) then your days are probably somewhat numbered, because it is a lot more work for CCP to cater to the 8 or 10 year old player than it is to cater to the one week old newbie.. hahahahahaha |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
also nullsec anomaly running is way too safe and there's too little risk because of BUBBLES AND LOCAL nobody ever loses ratting ships in nullsec, hisec incursions are the riskiest pve in the game because one time i heard from some dude in my vanguard fleet that his corpmate lost his nightmare when one of the logis lost his connection "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
528
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:23:00 -
[57] - Quote
Andski wrote:also nullsec anomaly running is way too safe and there's too little risk because of BUBBLES AND LOCAL nobody ever loses ratting ships in nullsec, hisec incursions are the riskiest pve in the game because one time i heard from some dude in my vanguard fleet that his corpmate lost his nightmare when one of the logis lost his connection your leader lets you rat in your space? ours just yells at us to use Incursion alts because they're both more profitable and safer, then jump clone back to fight for space
truly the rewards of nullsec space vs incursions is balanced indeed |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
318
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:24:00 -
[58] - Quote
Chokichi,
people who live outside hisec don't need to be catered for. Give us balanced income in regards to hisec, give us working mechanics and we will cater to ourselves forever. This is the essence of sandbox, an environment that rewards those are willing to put in the effort, dedication and creativity to make things happen for themselves- victory over other players, not over NPC AI.
It's the hisec instant gratification, spoiled "givemenow" kids who demand new content to be created for them, more candies and more shinies. Catering to this crowd is developer-intensive, against CCP's own vision and a route that would make this less of a sandbox, more of just another themepark, where amusements amuse only that short while when they are new and shiny.
|
Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
124
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
CTA tax was 100% and we had CTA tax pretty much every time I logged in so that was never really a debate for me. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
528
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:29:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
CTA tax was 100% and we had CTA tax pretty much every time I logged in so that was never really a debate for me.
that's when you undock in the hulk because they can't tax ore and if anyone talks to you you say you have 'wife aggro' |
|
Jackie Fisher
Syrkos Technologies Joint Venture Conglomerate
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:29:00 -
[61] - Quote
Xearal wrote:As nobody asked.. Your Stuffs, I can haz? There is no stuffs to haz - ebil Soundwave took it all!
|
Endeavour Starfleet
731
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:tl;dr - endeavor starfleet once joined some crappy nullsec renters because they're the only ones that would take in his equally worthless main before getting run back to highsec because it was full of quitters just like him who gave up at the first sign of adversity
lol full api key to rent space, where does he think of this ****?
I left renters because renters could care less about what happens to EVE. They will only whine ***** moan and quit after the fact never having once bothered to tell CCP. "This is broken"
People like you just don't get it. You view hisec as the great unwashed or the rebels. They wont be your fodder and they wont be your target (Or free victim) so what does that make them to you. "Worthless" Never mind that the fact that they did not quit during trial is why CCP has hundreds of employees working on EVE almost every day of the year. You can't stand the thought of someone saying no to Nullsec or wormhole dog crap being the goal of said player. Those who have experience in nullsec yet stay in high are now automatically "Worthless mains that can't get in the good ones" to folks like you Despite you knowing nothing about said person. The idea of nullsec pilot saying no to broken nullsec just doesn't click.
|
Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
At the moment, industrialists in 0.0 suffer under extreme disadvantages in virtually every aspect compared to those in hi-sec. Why shouldn't CCP level the playing field somewhat? Why should manufacturers in hi-sec get better quality station facilities, more station facilities, free CONCORD protection, multiple stations in the same system, and then cry unfairness when CCP Soundwave proposes a rebalancing?
Why do you hate 0.0 industrialists so much? |
Valleria Darkmoon
Parsec Flux
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:35:00 -
[64] - Quote
Why would you play this game in the first place if your only goal is to steadily watch your wallet balance increase, how boring. Do you also watch the clock counting the minutes until you can go to bed?
Remember null players are often running both a micro and a macro risk by working in the space they do.
On a micro level they are risking the ship they are currently in as does everyone in space at all times, even in high sec although the real risk there is much lower generally.
On a macro level they are risking everything they have established in the space in which they live. If they start losing sov they lose access to stations, POSes burn all over and billions gets trapped in areas you can no longer realistically access. Wormholers take a similar risk though on a smaller scale as the logistics of attacking a wormhole corp can be tricky if you're unprepared. There is money to be made there as well but frankly those willing to put up hundreds of billions on both macro and micro risk levels deserve the highest payout, period.
I'm fine even with low sec becoming much more profitable, incursion or otherwise. Go out to Kador low sec on any given day. I had to go almost 20 jumps before I found a single POSed up Myrm, don't tell me doing your PvE out there is suicide because it's only suicide in your mind, this is NOT dangerous space by any stretch. Most of null is either empty or blue to you. Even when it's not blue, I've ninja ratted/plexed for days without ever docking and hauled back hundreds of millions in loot because there was simply no one else around. Use your map, a scout and your survival tactics and you'll be fine. Although I've not set foot in high sec for a very long time I approve of the changes. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:37:00 -
[65] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:your leader lets you rat in your space? ours just yells at us to use Incursion alts because they're both more profitable and safer, then jump clone back to fight for space
truly the rewards of nullsec space vs incursions is balanced indeed
sov holding is basically a gimmick whose only real benefit is allowing you to build supercaps and upgrade ihubs to allow more anoms to spawn so that nobody will bother running them "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:39:00 -
[66] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:People like you just don't get it. You view hisec as the great unwashed or the rebels. They wont be your fodder and they wont be your target (Or free victim) so what does that make them to you.
actually anyone who lives in highsec after playing the game for years upon years is just a risk-averse baby scared to death of the idea of losing access to the stations where all their things are in
the "rebels" live in wormholes and we just leave them alone because we suck at probing "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Sisohiv
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 09:44:00 -
[67] - Quote
Andski wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:your leader lets you rat in your space? ours just yells at us to use Incursion alts because they're both more profitable and safer, then jump clone back to fight for space
truly the rewards of nullsec space vs incursions is balanced indeed sov holding is basically a gimmick whose only real benefit is allowing you to build supercaps and upgrade ihubs to allow more anoms to spawn so that nobody will bother running them
And jump Bridge arrays but that took another kick in the face last year when they restricted it to one per system.
Null is and always has been an ISK sink. How much ISK does Goon have tied up in capital and super capital BPO's? |
Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
226
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:08:00 -
[68] - Quote
lol endeavour butthurt bitchin bout afk cloakers wis shall not be a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, devoid of gameplay and consequnces. |
Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:11:00 -
[69] - Quote
Haha OP! Interesting point of view you have there. The way I read that is basically less competition from morons. While morons may be moronic, they are numerous enough to cause problems. Can't wait! |
Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
226
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:15:00 -
[70] - Quote
also most of you hisecers except RvB duders, are all worthless because you are all mindless drones grinding for your next plex, why do you even play this game quit and gtfo wis shall not be a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, devoid of gameplay and consequnces. |
|
March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
145
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:18:00 -
[71] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:hey anyone reading this i have a noctis tackled in NIZJ-0 in esoteria but my anathema can't crack the noctis' passive shield regen someone plz help i will fleet u and you can warp to this anom and we will share this km : twisted: http://i.imgur.com/2fgg8.jpg try to put more than 1 n00b gun next time |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
666
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:31:00 -
[72] - Quote
Maby its good maby not we will see, maby we will have "protests" again maby not. |
Riddick Liddell
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 10:43:00 -
[73] - Quote
Taiwanistan wrote:also most of you pve lovin hisecers are all worthless because you do nothing but grind for your next plex, what you going to tell me that pve in eve is fun? why do you even play this game quit and gtfo
Then you wouldn't have anything to bellyache about.
|
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
97
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:07:00 -
[74] - Quote
You know what's really shafting high sec industry? The people that do high sec industry.
I see it all the time, people making things where there's no profit in it then complaining about it.
Here's a free tip, buy up mid-meta mission loot for less than it's material value, reprocess, sell materials... or make stuff out of it and then sell it for it's material value (if not more).
Also, why should it be possibly to make huge amounts of easy, risk free, isk in empire? |
Mashie Saldana
Veto. Veto Corp
428
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:25:00 -
[75] - Quote
So what exactly is wrong with getting EVE back on track again? Dominique Vasilkovsky Mashie Saldana Monica Foulkes |
Ender Karazaki
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:32:00 -
[76] - Quote
I'm shaking in my virtual boots. Really I am...shaking. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5772
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:37:00 -
[77] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:I don't believe CCP is dumb enough to stomp on hisec players that hard. Especially after the many nerfs the players have already experienced Nerfs such asGǪ?
Mashie Saldana wrote:So what exactly is wrong with getting EVE back on track again? Your off-the-track earning scheme might be ruined. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |
Victor Valka
Endoxa Corporation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:38:00 -
[78] - Quote
EVE IS DYING!!!11!00001011!
What? Wrong thread? |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:40:00 -
[79] - Quote
I never found 0.0 that risky but only stayed there about a month. Get rid of local then you could really call it risky. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:46:00 -
[80] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote:I never found 0.0 that risky but only stayed there about a month. Get rid of local then you could really call it risky.
yeah you're pretty dumb "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:48:00 -
[81] - Quote
then again you probably don't consider losing access to your assets and having to firesale at 50% jita price a risk or you failed to consider that in your assessment because lol one month in nullsec
btw since it was so safe why didn't you stay there ;p "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Grumpy Owly
409
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:49:00 -
[82] - Quote
Victor Valka wrote:EVE IS DYING!!!11!00001011! What? Wrong thread?
Please tell us who is offending you from behind and what we can do to help make it stop?
Bounty Hunting for CSM7
It's just criminal - Smuggling |
FTLENGAGE
Michael Schumacher Fan club
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:53:00 -
[83] - Quote
mechtech wrote:Risk vs reward is what this game was founded on, and it's broken, way broken. High sec income needs to drop by 1/2 across the board, or content needs to be revamped to actually be difficult (lvl4s for example were created before rigs or T3 BSs were released). so why is it so easy to farm rats in 0.0 with 0 risk? |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
321
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:57:00 -
[84] - Quote
FTLENGAGE wrote: so why is it so easy to farm rats in 0.0 with 0 risk?
Because they made it safe for themselves.
They, not CCP.
|
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:58:00 -
[85] - Quote
Andski wrote:Sasha Azala wrote:I never found 0.0 that risky but only stayed there about a month. Get rid of local then you could really call it risky. yeah you're pretty dumb
Would you like to expand on your comment?
We used to get hostiles coming through you could see them entering the system and just avoid them if you wished. As well as reporting their whereabouts.
But it would have been more interesting without local.
Edit: I see you have expanded on your comment in another post. |
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1404
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:59:00 -
[86] - Quote
Seriously chill out.
The problem with Eve the last few years is it got horribly stale and boring. People got stuck in their ways and much of the game turned into yawnsville online. Soundwave is right that it needs shaking to the core. Many forms of hisec income are too easy. Lowsec income definitely needs boosting in terms of interest and profitability and Nullsec passive moon income needed shooting in the head.
I wouldn't worry too much with theories of goon csms getting all they wanted btw. Chances are Mittani and crew will be kicking and screaming and whinging behind the scenes right up to the moment the ring-mining change happens and all the static moon goo wealth goes away. That will be the single most significant change the game has seen since moon-mining was introduced and it will turn 0.0 back into a brutal bloody warzone where alliances smash themselves to pieces in the quest for regional security and mining opportunity.
Impact on the rest of the game -> potentially immense as the prices of t2 ships and modules skyrocket - maybe it'll become more difficult for the average player to replace missioning nighthawks in the future but frankly - good.
Eve should be about interconnected systems where actions in one part of space impact players everywhere else. Last few years its like Hisec and Nullsec where separate shards and thats not how the game should work.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
Jastra
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 11:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Skydell wrote:it's really rather amusing, all this peanut gallery gibberish. Most of the people talking out of thier ass don't know or care to know the history of EVE.
There was a time there was no Concord and EVE was the wild west of MMO's with "HTFU EVE" mantra ruling the skies of New Eden. They alos couldn't break 5K subs with that model and soon changed it. Since that time, CCP stopped being an Inde corp and became a larger entity with debt to reflect it. If they killed carbear in EVE I would put money on it, EVE would drop to max 30K Subs with 6K login (like it used to be not that many years ago) and with CCP's current debt, the company would bankrupt. A company that is 10 years old is not old, it's a new company. A company that went from 75K revenue to 6 million revenue a month in 10 years is what is known to investors as a bubble.
EVE is not a l33tboi PvP bear game. EVE is a sandbox. It is Industry, it is exploration, it is PvE, it is PvP, it is mining, manufacturing, it is many, many things and you can smack talk all you want but the fact is, EVE needs all its players. It needs them all to feel achieved and it needs them to be having fun.
Or It Dies.
Yeah this (good post) - we all play the game in our own ways and have differing abilities to commit. I have to say I apparently choose to hear more positive things in terms of PVE than others, mining planet belts, love for POS and production coming (albeit next year I think), possibility of FPS exploration, new stuff to build.
Stuff like transaction charges and datacores is nothing to worry about unless you buy a lot of stuff, like, say if you lose a lot of ships, in say, PVP, since your prices will go up as the essential building blocks become more expensive (IF they become more expensive), but anyone producing stuff profitably will just add the extra charges into the price, surely ? - thats the way I assume CCP plan to take some ISK out of the economy, who recalls when Cap recharger 2's were like 20 million ?
What I would say is there is SO much negativity on these forums at the moment, which does not seem to be representative of fanfest, we all need to sit in a circle and sing songs or something.... it's just a game and if any of us played it in exactly the same way it would be dull, surely the essence of it's brilliance is it's a living breathing ecology. I love the PVP aspect and I love the carebear aspect, I dont see the big fuss over them and us.
|
FTLENGAGE
Michael Schumacher Fan club
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:02:00 -
[88] - Quote
Roime wrote:FTLENGAGE wrote: so why is it so easy to farm rats in 0.0 with 0 risk?
Because they made it safe for themselves. They, not CCP. low sec should have the best rewards then.....
far harder to keep low sec secure than it is some 0.0 region at the end of the universe a million jumps from anywhere |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:03:00 -
[89] - Quote
Andski wrote:then again you probably don't consider losing access to your assets and having to firesale at 50% jita price a risk or you failed to consider that in your assessment because lol one month in nullsec
btw since it was so safe why didn't you stay there ;p
The day to day ISK making was fairly safe, but we lost the space in the end, thanks to the Russians. Fair play to them.
I also had assets that I had to remotely get rid of via contracts very cheaply. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:07:00 -
[90] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote:Would you like to expand on your comment?
We used to get hostiles coming through you could see them entering the system and just avoid them if you wished. As well as reporting their whereabouts.
But it would have been more interesting without local.
clearly you are qualified to give these insights because of the whole month you spent in nullsec
it's not like making cloaks overpowered is an issue "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
|
Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:10:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jade is right: a good shakeup stops stagnation. |
AraniFyr
Shadow State SpaceMonkey's Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:10:00 -
[92] - Quote
"many of the changes are going to trash high sec industrial chars specifically"
ummm no? Do your realize how much ISK this is going to make me? |
Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:10:00 -
[93] - Quote
"Crisis is a synonym for opportunity" |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:14:00 -
[94] - Quote
FTLENGAGE wrote:Roime wrote:FTLENGAGE wrote: so why is it so easy to farm rats in 0.0 with 0 risk?
Because they made it safe for themselves. They, not CCP. low sec should have the best rewards then..... far harder to keep low sec secure than it is some 0.0 region at the end of the universe a million jumps from anywhere
Nullsec regions are pretty difficult to keep secure if you can't give anybody a reason to live there. Intel channels work as well as they do because you have enough dudes around to allow for fairly accurate intel on hostile movements. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
227
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:15:00 -
[95] - Quote
Nothing was said about legality of "pirate" ships, mods and implants in high sec?
Gees, missed a huge hole being plugged for why you should leave high sec eventually.
---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3405
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:15:00 -
[96] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Chances are Mittani and crew will be kicking and screaming and whinging behind the scenes right up to the moment the ring-mining change happens and all the static moon goo wealth goes away.
The fact that you think that anybody on the CSM is against a tech rebalance is hilarious. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1406
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:25:00 -
[97] - Quote
Andski wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Chances are Mittani and crew will be kicking and screaming and whinging behind the scenes right up to the moment the ring-mining change happens and all the static moon goo wealth goes away. The fact that you think that anybody on the CSM is against a tech rebalance is hilarious.
You keep saying "tech rebalance" as if it doesn't meen "moon goo income armageddon"
Removing trillions of isk of guarenteed passive income each month from the game and forcing nullsec alliances to actually put players in space to gather resources in a way that can be interdicted by other players in small gangs is so fair beyond the word "rebalance" its rather funny too.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
107
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:27:00 -
[98] - Quote
Andski wrote:Sasha Azala wrote:Would you like to expand on your comment?
We used to get hostiles coming through you could see them entering the system and just avoid them if you wished. As well as reporting their whereabouts.
But it would have been more interesting without local.
clearly you are qualified to give these insights because of the whole month you spent in nullsec it's not like making cloaks overpowered is an issue
I didn't need a whole month to see how useful local was for warning you that hostiles were there. Learnt to use that very quickly.
It would have been much more challenging at the time if you could not see hostiles in local. |
Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:33:00 -
[99] - Quote
FTLENGAGE wrote:mechtech wrote:Risk vs reward is what this game was founded on, and it's broken, way broken. High sec income needs to drop by 1/2 across the board, or content needs to be revamped to actually be difficult (lvl4s for example were created before rigs or T3 BSs were released). so why is it so easy to farm rats in 0.0 with 0 risk?
Why is it that the people who say how easy and safe it is to farm BS rats and mine ABC ores in 0.0 are all mining veldspar and doing level 4s in hi-sec? |
Pheusia
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:36:00 -
[100] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Andski wrote:Jade Constantine wrote:Chances are Mittani and crew will be kicking and screaming and whinging behind the scenes right up to the moment the ring-mining change happens and all the static moon goo wealth goes away. The fact that you think that anybody on the CSM is against a tech rebalance is hilarious. You keep saying "tech rebalance" as if it doesn't meen "moon goo income armageddon" Removing trillions of isk of guarenteed passive income each month from the game and forcing nullsec alliances to actually put players in space to gather resources in a way that can be interdicted by other players in small gangs is so fair beyond the word "rebalance" its rather funny too.
Nevertheless, there is a pretty universal public consensus that it needs to be done. |
|
Khanh'rhh
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
914
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:38:00 -
[101] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Once we make it impossible to place a POS in highsec this game will get interesting again.
This is actually the best idea I have heard. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Victor Valka
Endoxa Corporation
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:41:00 -
[102] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Victor Valka wrote:EVE IS DYING!!!11!00001011! What? Wrong thread? Please tell us who is offending you from behind and what we can do to help make it stop? Stop? Why'd I want that?
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3406
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:44:00 -
[103] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Removing trillions of isk of guarenteed passive income each month from the game
i stopped reading at "Removing trillions of isk" because of course you probably think that moon goo adds ISK to the game "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
931
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:45:00 -
[104] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:**** highsec industry tbh
Ho because you think null sec industry is mainly done in null sec? - no
For a lot of reasons it's much better to produce in high sec then ship to null, sell those goods 20 to 250% more than high sec, they never loose whatever, by making disappear high sec small industrials you will only increase significantly the income of null sec industrials producing in high sec
What you are doing however is push high sec industrials, or at least those that will not leave the game, go to WH's. Knowing the number of interesting corporations/alliances that do this seriously, get ready to wine about ABC's mined in WH's again and blahblahblah
Take moon goo out of the alliances hands, nice stuff, it's the way that how this is going to change that is bad. Now don't be silly to think that it's you, random peon, that it's gonna take your shiny hulk and start mining R64 tomorrow because it will not be the case.
This is terribly bad for players if it's implemented strictly in 0.0, will not change that much for alliances since they have their own mining corporations but will just increase significantly fees charge for corporations living there that don't mine R64 You don't think alliances will just let the gazillions income of moon mining go like pouf just like that?
-they will get their income by increasing significantly the charge per player, thing is that the way CCP is intending to implement it, plus the reduction in bounty, it's terribly bad per peon. (Im already not doing PI anymore because income/time spent is just stupid) I don't see this increase the random peon income that much, but the older players playing for free with their dozen alts, the sames that already clean entire system anoms FTL, can clean "The Maze" faster than you'll ever clean a lvl3 alone, etc
CCP will never learn Malcanis law, they don't understand a crap of it or don't do the right thing, the point above will really change 0.0 card forever imho. Cool, good days are coming, less time spent in front of the screen playing tedious games.
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3406
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:45:00 -
[105] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:Why is it that the people who say how easy and safe it is to farm BS rats and mine ABC ores in 0.0 are all mining veldspar and doing level 4s in hi-sec?
they like living on the edge "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Galega Ori
Assero Argentum
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:47:00 -
[106] - Quote
Skydell wrote:You have pretty much condensed it to where it is going, OP.
High sec is going to become unplayable. "Be afraid" you say. Who? 10 years now, CCP have tried, tried and failed to herd the masses to null sec. You said so yourself. Most will just quit.
Who should be afraid here?
Last time I checked EVE was supposed to be a sandbox style game. So why dose CCP feel the need to take all my sand away and force me to play where i don't want to?
|
Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
258
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:51:00 -
[107] - Quote
Quote:but if they nerf all NPC income by 10%, yet Drones start having bounties, will not that be a wash for null sec income, but a high sec income nerf
If you think about it, NPC bounties are pretty common to the point that they bring in more ISK into the economy than Incursions according to CCP Recurve's Dev Blog on the matter. In fact, everywhere I go to mine there are NPC rats everywhere coming in about every 15 minutes or so and I usually take care of them with my drones. The bounties are pathetic in the short term for a single miner, but if you take into account the number of miners I run into along with all the other miners throughout high-sec that mine with drones deployed, the amount from bounties suddenly start looking like a flood.
As to how much bounties are gathered from belt rats compared to mission rats remains to be seen, though. But in a way, miners are directly contributing to the ISK faucet whenever they clear out a belt rat while mining. One way to get around this is buffer tank the mining ships to the point where the natural shield recharge rate can overcome the damage and just let the rats hang around, which is easy if you have a Hulk and you have fleet boosts. For Retrievers and Covetors, that is a different story as they have limited tank capabilities and are therefore forced to destroy the rats and thus contribute to the ISK faucet. Of course, T1 mining barges were never meant to be efficient tankers anyways and therefore are meant to be disposable mining vessels.
To me, however, the main issue is not about the ISK faucet from belt rats. I feel that the main issue is about the minerals coming from drones after you pop them. They are a huge crimp on our mining industry and therefore should end as soon as possible. But it's not just that. It's also the way how mining in general is setup. It's the least social, and the least interactive activity there is as it is right now. Therefore, mining is the least focus-driven career there is. I just hope that the CSM7 pushes CCP to iterate on that industry so that mining can be far more social, interactive and more focus-driven than before. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
321
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:53:00 -
[108] - Quote
Galega Ori wrote:Skydell wrote:You have pretty much condensed it to where it is going, OP.
High sec is going to become unplayable. "Be afraid" you say. Who? 10 years now, CCP have tried, tried and failed to herd the masses to null sec. You said so yourself. Most will just quit.
Who should be afraid here? Last time I checked EVE was supposed to be a sandbox style game. So why dose CCP feel the need to take all my sand away and force me to play where i don't want to?
Where did they say they want to take your sand away?
Right, they didn't.
|
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
107
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 12:55:00 -
[109] - Quote
Galega Ori wrote:Skydell wrote:You have pretty much condensed it to where it is going, OP.
High sec is going to become unplayable. "Be afraid" you say. Who? 10 years now, CCP have tried, tried and failed to herd the masses to null sec. You said so yourself. Most will just quit.
Who should be afraid here? Last time I checked EVE was supposed to be a sandbox style game. So why dose CCP feel the need to take all my sand away and force me to play where i don't want to?
CCP have been trying to spread people more thinly around for years now, reasoning for the most part was lag issues I believe.
But I've said it many times, you can't force people to go where they don't want to go, not if they have a choice. As paying customers they do have a choice. |
AureoBroker
Natural Inventions Solyaris Chtonium
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:02:00 -
[110] - Quote
Hisec should be a free (if taxed) haven to trade and meet on neutral ground. Scale industry shouldn't be permitted. Neither should big-time hunting. But, that balances the real problem.
The real problem is that fights are had over nothing. If someone wanders in low/null for no reason, he'll get killed for no reason. Not resource protection, not territory protection, not even extortion. Just KMs. Re-instate real ammo costs, appropriate defenses on industrial ships, impossibility to easily farm resources to attack no-value targets, remove KMs - and then we can talk about a groundbreaking hisec nerf.
The day hunts and kills are done on resource-based contends, nullsec dwellers can make a point that highsec shouldn't have even the potential to make as many resources as conquerable space. Until kills are done at no-cost and to no scope, it's evident that nullsec's point isn't resources - is the fight itself.
When a roaming gang will see a mining fleet and it will NOT jump on it unless it's a known enemy / suspected to be such, removing hisec is ridicolous. It's not about risk-adversion: The "wastelands" activities aren't balanced on risk - attacking non-offending parties is riskless and costless.
When we'll have a point that nullsec is to be expanded (population-wise) due to actual resource-orientented gameplay, and not due to "lack of targets", highsec can be nerfed to the ground.
Until then, keep whining. |
|
FTLENGAGE
Michael Schumacher Fan club
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:03:00 -
[111] - Quote
Pheusia wrote:FTLENGAGE wrote:mechtech wrote:Risk vs reward is what this game was founded on, and it's broken, way broken. High sec income needs to drop by 1/2 across the board, or content needs to be revamped to actually be difficult (lvl4s for example were created before rigs or T3 BSs were released). so why is it so easy to farm rats in 0.0 with 0 risk? Why is it that the people who say how easy and safe it is to farm BS rats and mine ABC ores in 0.0 are all mining veldspar and doing level 4s in hi-sec? i lived in 0.0 for years on my other chars and it was always ridiculous how much isk you could make if you stopped pvping for a few hours. i used to spent about 7 days a month ratting and that would easy cover the cost of plex on 3 accounts and all the losses i would make
with all the logistics that are available now 0.0 is to easy, jump bridges , jump drives etc.
the only risk is getting minerals/ships/mods from one part of highsec to a 0.4 system its a JOKE!
i remember when you had a fleet of 50-100 people full of zyd/megacyte traveling from 0.0 to empire in a huge conoy to keep it safe and split the risk of it all going up in smoke...
these days you stick it in a carrie and wave it good bye |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
321
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
Where did they say that they will be forcing people to move somewhere?
Right, they didn't.
|
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
107
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:09:00 -
[113] - Quote
Roime wrote:Where did they say that they will be forcing people to move somewhere?
Right, they didn't.
They don't have to directly say it.
Their actions/changes speak just as loud as words.
Like the time they tried to spread out the mission runners and instead forced mission runners to be more compacted away from the borders of low-sec. |
Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
933
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:10:00 -
[114] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Seriously chill out.
The problem with Eve the last few years is it got horribly stale and boring. People got stuck in their ways and much of the game turned into yawnsville online. Soundwave is right that it needs shaking to the core. Many forms of hisec income are too easy. Lowsec income definitely needs boosting in terms of interest and profitability and Nullsec passive moon income needed shooting in the head.
I wouldn't worry too much with theories of goon csms getting all they wanted btw. Chances are Mittani and crew will be kicking and screaming and whinging behind the scenes right up to the moment the ring-mining change happens and all the static moon goo wealth goes away. That will be the single most significant change the game has seen since moon-mining was introduced and it will turn 0.0 back into a brutal bloody warzone where alliances smash themselves to pieces in the quest for regional security and mining opportunity.
Impact on the rest of the game -> potentially immense as the prices of t2 ships and modules skyrocket - maybe it'll become more difficult for the average player to replace missioning nighthawks in the future but frankly - good.
Eve should be about interconnected systems where actions in one part of space impact players everywhere else. Last few years its like Hisec and Nullsec where separate shards and thats not how the game should work.
I only see a little problem in your reasoning: WH's.
And ship price? -T3's price should go down the hill pretty fast, because wh's will be the only place where you can build most of the T3 parts without need of whatever R64, then faction and DED stuff don't need R64 stuff neither. Once those WH producers get how to get over the R64 skyrocket prices one problem will just be replaced by a probably bigger one.
Anyway, once implemented we'll see how good for the game all this stuff is and how good for the economy it is (no change imho because more valuable items=more trading revenue=more isk out of nowhere)
|
coolzero
The Replicators Northern Associates.
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:21:00 -
[115] - Quote
on the datecores..
nerfing them isnt fair imo at least for the persons who did the grinding before the reputatiuon change
i did my datacore agent before the reputation change and that took a hell of a long time to get those agents reputation(took me about a year + the skills.)
now you just have to get the reputation for the lowest lvl4 agents and you get all of the agents thus they made it waay to easy for everyone to farm data cores.
|
Roime
Shiva Furnace
321
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:21:00 -
[116] - Quote
Sasha Azala wrote:Roime wrote:Where did they say that they will be forcing people to move somewhere?
Right, they didn't.
They don't have to directly say it. Their actions/changes speak just as loud as words. Like the time they tried to spread out the mission runners and instead forced mission runners to be more compacted away from the borders of low-sec.
Ok, so it's just in your head
Cool. I kinda guessed that, tbh.
|
Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
116
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:54:00 -
[117] - Quote
Risk/reward balancing.
If you want more, then risk more. |
Ben Arwhal
The Scope Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 13:58:00 -
[118] - Quote
Noob opinion incoming!
I am a mining/manufacturing/mission-running noobbear, but:
I don't really see a problem with making highsec either: a) a more risky place to live or b) a less profitable place to live.
From the sounds of it, removing POS from highsec would be a good start.
Also, either dropping rat bounties in highsec (which has been suggested), or only have missions up to level 2-3 available in highsec, with everything else in lowsec.
Not to mention adjusting highsec incursions, "nerfing" them if you will, to encourage more people to head out to low/nullsec for those incursions.
I don't know that much can/should be changed about highsec mining or NPC-station production, though increasing market taxes paid might encourage some population shifting as well!
Ultimately, highsec is too safe and makes it too easy to make a lot of money.
Of course, I'm of the unusual and unpopular opinion that "highsec" should be removed from Eve entirely, so perhaps my ideas aren't worth much merit >_> |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
408
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 14:03:00 -
[119] - Quote
I don't have any problems with these changes and I live in highsec. I wonder why that is. |
Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 14:45:00 -
[120] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: I left nullsec..
I left it because it is a load of dog crap that rewards good ole boys and large alliances over small dedicated ones. Where asking for invasive Full API keys is now normal due to absurdly broken corp and POS mechanics. Where new players get shunned as potential spies due to said mechanics. Where FCs feel free to call kitchen sink CTAs and say "Don't like mah CTA? GTFO of Corp or log off" Where corps feel free to say "Don't report blue bots" Where major RMT operations run. Where lazy ass renters gather and never bother to read on the future of EVE much less care
And to be frank CCP It looks like you have barely just stated on this mountain of crap. Corp and POS fixes in 2013? They should have been planned with Inferno instead of shiny new (and will be abused) wardec system. Nothing about AFK cloaking?
I am not going back to nullsec until it is fixed. And yes that means I will sooner quit EVE after hisec sledgehammer nerfs hit than go back to null not having fun. The threat of members going back to hisec content is about the only thing keeping member abuse in check and once that is gone I will have better things to do than support a broken game by that point.
Beautifully said. Null sec jerks who want to scam us , make it clear we are not welcome in their corps, suspects everyone in the game is a spy, etc, etc. Why would anyone want to do deal with that to have "fun" in Null? |
|
Josefius
13th Tribe of Kobol Expeditionary
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 14:46:00 -
[121] - Quote
On day one of Fanfest, Seleene sitting with CCP Sunset and Soundwave said he saw so many "Carebears" coming to Fanfest, and Soundwave's face became a bitter scowl, it was rather illuminating. It's true that some emotions are hard to conceal but maybe I'm being paranoid. but to me, he doesn't appear to approve of that kind of play style. |
Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
502
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 14:59:00 -
[122] - Quote
Ok, after having watched about 1/3 of the video before stopping it I noticed something unsual
There are two guys in the video
There is a tray with six glasses and a container filled with water that looks like it goes in a pneumatic transport system (like at a bank for the drive through, put money in container, put in tube and its sucked to the other end)
But there are two Dasani bottles, one on the table and the other on a filing cabinet with another one of those pneumatic transport tube water jus
CCP Soundwave was having a drinking contest (on the clock, no alcohol), a pissing match in the restroom at 10 paces incase of a tie breaker, and he lost so has to do an interview
Either that theory or there was planning for defense of possible alien invasion in EVE but they are covering it up with the interview while the rest of the people who were at the table had left but Soundwave got ambushed before he could exit the room. Actually, that makes more sense
But back on topic - Don't like it, fed up with EVE, just not having fun anymore. Just leave, cancel sub, and walk away. Don't need a drama post, don't need to theorize about it, just Stop payment -> Go, perhaps say good bye to aquaintances and find something else in life. That is kind of where I am at, been waiting to long for some spark to reignite and continue my interest in EVE while spending more time on the forums trolling then in game and if these expansion doesn't cut it....like Porky Pig's "Th-th-th-that's all folks!" cause there ins't anything to keep me in EVE and no WoW isn't the destination |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3539
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 15:06:00 -
[123] - Quote
Why does the OP soud a bit pious?
So let me get this straingt? CCP wants to charge more for high sec protection via taxes, lesser pay, and gate tolls.
I see no problem here move along.
|
Kla2
Defiance LLC
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 15:09:00 -
[124] - Quote
Skydell wrote:
EVE is not a l33tboi PvP bear game. EVE is a sandbox. It is Industry, it is exploration, it is PvE, it is PvP, it is mining, manufacturing, it is many, many things and you can smack talk all you want but the fact is, EVE needs all its players. It needs them all to feel achieved and it needs them to be having fun.
A grain of truth amidst all the whining and complaining.
|
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
421
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 15:25:00 -
[125] - Quote
i live in highsec, none of what he says sounds bad a bit more taxes? idc it makes skills that reduce taxes more important incursion nerf? this has been needed for a while in fact what it sounds like will happen is more LP less isk, meaning its less of a faucet, not less profitable datacore farming? its still going to be isk machines, just not as profitable in fact it will not become an is sink. bounty nerf? this will be in every region and after drones get bounties |
Kla2
Defiance LLC
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 15:27:00 -
[126] - Quote
Josefius wrote:On day one of Fanfest, Seleene sitting with CCP Sunset and Soundwave said he saw so many "Carebears" coming to Fanfest, and Soundwave's face became a bitter scowl, it was rather illuminating. It's true that some emotions are hard to conceal but maybe I'm being paranoid. but to me, he doesn't appear to approve of that kind of play style.
What did you expect? Think back to Sim City. After you've built this fantastic city with all your time and hard work.........the very next thing you did was send godzilla or a meteor shower or some other diasaster to your little world. And watch it burn. Then build it back. EVE is CCP's Sim City. Why should they want it to be easy and passive? They want to toss in a few grenades and watch us scramble around trying to survive. They wouldn't have it any other way.....unless we won't pay for it, hehe. |
Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
29
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 15:30:00 -
[127] - Quote
Kla2 wrote:Skydell wrote:
EVE is not a l33tboi PvP bear game. EVE is a sandbox. It is Industry, it is exploration, it is PvE, it is PvP, it is mining, manufacturing, it is many, many things and you can smack talk all you want but the fact is, EVE needs all its players. It needs them all to feel achieved and it needs them to be having fun.
A grain of truth amidst all the whining and complaining.
I am in wait and see mode. I expect this to be a disaster , obviously. If I can't pay for my accounts through high sec operations that are not equivalent to a job, I will simply let my accounts lapse.
The consequences of CCP's actions will be seen by mid/late fall, whatever they might be.
|
Josefius
13th Tribe of Kobol Expeditionary
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 15:33:00 -
[128] - Quote
Kla2 wrote:Josefius wrote:On day one of Fanfest, Seleene sitting with CCP Sunset and Soundwave said he saw so many "Carebears" coming to Fanfest, and Soundwave's face became a bitter scowl, it was rather illuminating. It's true that some emotions are hard to conceal but maybe I'm being paranoid. but to me, he doesn't appear to approve of that kind of play style. What did you expect? Think back to Sim City. After you've built this fantastic city with all your time and hard work.........the very next thing you did was send godzilla or a meteor shower or some other diasaster to your little world. And watch it burn. Then build it back. EVE is CCP's Sim City. Why should they want it to be easy and passive? They want to toss in a few grenades and watch us scramble around trying to survive. They wouldn't have it any other way.....unless we won't pay for it, hehe.
You make a very good point... and yes I remember those days :) |
Noceur-01 Tiers
Dvice Shipyards
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 16:41:00 -
[129] - Quote
I hope we see much changes making high sec into **** because I'm tired of dwelling there. Going out as it is right now would most likely only get me killed very fast without any good ways of actually supporting my life in comparison to hisec incursions/lv4s but if there was a mass emigration I would love to go out there. Also I would assume that with more players the possibility to do solo/duo pvp becomes more possible. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1382
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:28:00 -
[130] - Quote
Josefius wrote:On day one of Fanfest, Seleene sitting with CCP Sunset and Soundwave said he saw so many "Carebears" coming to Fanfest, and Soundwave's face became a bitter scowl, it was rather illuminating. It's true that some emotions are hard to conceal but maybe I'm being paranoid. but to me, he doesn't appear to approve of that kind of play style.
I'm pretty sure Soundwave doesn't have any issues with a particular play style. I certainly don't because I've probably spent as much time building things as I have destroying them. v0v Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
|
Minabunny
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:46:00 -
[131] - Quote
Ultima Online - I find that funny. Everyone uses easyuo in that game. |
Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:55:00 -
[132] - Quote
Eh I dont see it as an exclusive high sec nerf... |
Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:56:00 -
[133] - Quote
Who cares if your income is going down by 10%
90% of peanuts/hour is still peanuts/hour |
Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:03:00 -
[134] - Quote
None of this sounds particularly bad or dire. The economy is out of control. High sec needs to be shaken up. I can live with bounty cuts and tax increases, and I don't see much else here. There are drone missions in high sec, too, so I don't understand why OP does not think that will in fact balance out. High end minerals also come from wormholes, which are relatively safe places to play, if you know what you're doing or you have a good corp to teach you.
The other changes CCP has announced regarding high sec security are in fact encouraging to players who want a safer environment for their play. If that comes with a cost, so be it. Safety should cost more. Rewards to high sec should be lowered if risk in high sec is also being lowered.
|
Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
199
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:10:00 -
[135] - Quote
Has CCP said what proportion of the player community plays exclusively in highsec?
I'd want to be very careful about biting the hand that feeds if I were them.
As to whether I'll throw in the towel after these nerfs go into effect, I'll have to see how badly it bites my ability to make ISK. Already tried nullsec gameplay is it sucks kinda badly from my point of view, so highsec is where I live. |
Plaude Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:17:00 -
[136] - Quote
Who cares? On my two other accounts, I already planned on moving into a WH soon, so **** the high-sec nerf. And with this one, well, I'll find something to do. Probably find a dozen or two new players, roam around in null-sec with them, kill stuff...
You high-seccers just go ahead and have fun whining over a high-sec nerf. I'll be sitting here in the corner. Killing stuff. For fun. Ignoring you... The usual. |
Large Collidable Object
morons.
1223
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:24:00 -
[137] - Quote
Sounds great - I may finally have an incentive to go back to 0.
I doubt much will change for the majority - profit divided by zero risk is still an infinite risk/profit ratio - no matter how heavily taxed it is. morons- sting like a butterfly and-ápost like a bee. |
Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:25:00 -
[138] - Quote
Ana Vyr wrote:Has CCP said what proportion of the player community plays exclusively in highsec?
I'd want to be very careful about biting the hand that feeds if I were them.
As to whether I'll throw in the towel after these nerfs go into effect, I'll have to see how badly it bites my ability to make ISK. Already tried nullsec gameplay is it sucks kinda badly from my point of view, so highsec is where I live.
This. Until then, I'll continue to mirror the cliche of the crazy old guy sitting on his porch with a shotgun all day long because the bank keeps on coming by trying to buy his land, that he doesn't want to sell, because they want to build a stripmall, but he doesn't give an eff because it's where his pappy grew up and died and his pappy before him and his pappy too and it's where he'll live and die too. Captain of the Battlestar Carebear |
Shade Severii
Satan's Escorts MIDGET CHUCKERS
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:30:00 -
[139] - Quote
I have spent half my life as a high sec bear and half as a WH bear and these changes look good. |
Conu Leonida
Ex 24.7 v3
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:33:00 -
[140] - Quote
CCP won't do anything to endanger their hisec dwellers. They might prod them and touch them in some places, but they won't risk alienate the people not willing to go into lowsec, WH or nullsec.
Asides for suicide ganks which are more common along miners or going for +2bil fits and can-baiting, pushing people averse to PVP into PVP will not work. They are settled in their own ways and most of them would look for something else where they could do similar activities.
Despite all their high and mighty attitude, CCP is still a company trying to make money. So, withing limits, the more people joining the game and having a decent start-up experience, thus sticking with the game, the better.
Thus, we need to take into account that quite a lot of people are in "protected" space. Which means, discounting the PVP-ers, that they may be at least equal to the people in lowsec and nullsec, where supposedly the risk is a constant. After that, we need to take into account that most MMO players are "carebears" which like to bash NPCs.
Therefore, CCP will have limited maneuver space to modifying game-play in hisec. |
|
Serene Repose
Perkone Caldari State
393
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:35:00 -
[141] - Quote
How quickly we go from "It's a sandbox. Do what you want." TO "EVE is supposed to be a....(insert ill-considered, self-centered definition.)" This is why few of these people can be trusted. It's not that they're dishonest (which most of them are). It's that they can't juggle complicated things in their minds. It's got to be all THIS or all THAT with them.
The CCP weenies won't say either way. However, you have to believe they had something in mind when they dreamed all this up. Both sides can't be right (architecturally or mechanically speaking). It's doubtful the one-dimensional thinkers have a hope to be right. What CCP's intention was at inception seems to have changed like a deadbeat dad's at conception. They're standing back with their hands behind them pretending not to notice.
The MAJORITY (which isn't you Goonwaffle) subscribes (with money) to the notion it's a SANDBOX. It's not hard to visualize the really good and experienced players (Read: YOU Goonwaffles) have evolved a game for themselves that allow them to set up their own dynasties in null sec. Low sec players [can] be situated in between the beginners and the pros, too good to be in hi sec, not quite organized enough to move into null.
The WARS arise when competing interests in NULL start bumping into each other as they expand...push coming to shove over resources, transportation lanes and other such traditional reasons for eternal warfare.
All this talk about "make hi sec like this" so "null and low sec can be like this" is NOT a sandbox. It's tailoring the game mechanics to suit one method of play "EVE is supposed to be like...."
The MAJORITY of players AREN'T stupid. We see this being done. We have good bullshit detectors, so however it's being phrased, it is what it is. Chest beating, crowing, insulting, coercion are all what they've always been since we came out of the trees. No base, digital, MMO-l33t, vandal has a hope of convincing anyone (even themselves) that it's otherwise.
A sign of a cogent idea is it's not self-contradictory. There's a lot of people who need to either STFU or go back to the drawing board...but, that would be the intelligent thing to do...something not operating in this environment (so the naked eye can detect it.)
Smokestack lightnin' shinin' just like gold. |
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1174
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:36:00 -
[142] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Josefius wrote:On day one of Fanfest, Seleene sitting with CCP Sunset and Soundwave said he saw so many "Carebears" coming to Fanfest, and Soundwave's face became a bitter scowl, it was rather illuminating. It's true that some emotions are hard to conceal but maybe I'm being paranoid. but to me, he doesn't appear to approve of that kind of play style. I'm pretty sure Soundwave doesn't have any issues with a particular play style. I certainly don't because I've probably spent as much time building things as I have destroying them. v0v
You should rebuild MC. I always wanted to join MC before you guys disbanded. :(
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
199
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 20:37:00 -
[143] - Quote
Conu Leonida wrote:CCP won't do anything to endanger their hisec dwellers. They might prod them and touch them in some places, but they won't risk alienate the people not willing to go into lowsec, WH or nullsec.
Asides for suicide ganks which are more common along miners or going for +2bil fits and can-baiting, pushing people averse to PVP into PVP will not work. They are settled in their own ways and most of them would look for something else where they could do similar activities.
Despite all their high and mighty attitude, CCP is still a company trying to make money. So, withing limits, the more people joining the game and having a decent start-up experience, thus sticking with the game, the better.
Thus, we need to take into account that quite a lot of people are in "protected" space. Which means, discounting the PVP-ers, that they may be at least equal to the people in lowsec and nullsec, where supposedly the risk is a constant. After that, we need to take into account that most MMO players are "carebears" which like to bash NPCs.
Therefore, CCP will have limited maneuver space to modifying game-play in hisec.
This sounds very reasonable and logical.
Then again we are talking about a company that tried to put a pay to win scheme in the game only a year ago.
Let's see what they do. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
262
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 21:55:00 -
[144] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:The MAJORITY (which isn't you Goonwaffle) subscribes (with money) to the notion it's a SANDBOX. It's not hard to visualize the really good and experienced players (Read: YOU Goonwaffles) have evolved a game for themselves that allow them to set up their own dynasties in null sec. Low sec players [can] be situated in between the beginners and the pros, too good to be in hi sec, not quite organized enough to move into null. You're subscribing a bit too hard to the idea that we seriously sit around and worry about that publords do in highsec. Other than some people who do stuff there like market action, mineral compressing, jump freightering most of us only occasionally care. (Other than of course if we're having celebrations in highsec~. I hope you stocked up on Caldari ice after Riverini told you of Bat Country's heroic interdiction). There's even a pretty nice market hub down here with competitive prices on stuff that is important to what we do.
A bunch of idiots decided to try and wipe a member corp off the map and after goodness how long of sieging them they got chased off in two days when we all came down to defend our allies. And then there's bigger things like people who will kick us out of our home by febuary, and people who don't want their moons in Tenal anymore. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |
Serene Repose
Perkone Caldari State
395
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 22:13:00 -
[145] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Serene Repose wrote:The MAJORITY (which isn't you Goonwaffle) subscribes (with money) to the notion it's a SANDBOX. It's not hard to visualize the really good and experienced players (Read: YOU Goonwaffles) have evolved a game for themselves that allow them to set up their own dynasties in null sec. Low sec players [can] be situated in between the beginners and the pros, too good to be in hi sec, not quite organized enough to move into null. You're subscribing a bit too hard to the idea that we seriously sit around and worry about that publords do in highsec. Other than some people who do stuff there like market action, mineral compressing, jump freightering most of us only occasionally care. (Other than of course if we're having celebrations in highsec~. I hope you stocked up on Caldari ice after Riverini told you of Bat Country's heroic interdiction). There's even a pretty nice market hub down here with competitive prices on stuff that is important to what we do. A bunch of idiots decided to try and wipe a member corp off the map and after goodness how long of sieging them they got chased off in two days when we all came down to defend our allies. And then there's bigger things like people who will kick us out of our home by febuary, and people who don't want their moons in Tenal anymore. I don't doubt this a bit. I can't see Goonwaffle being themselves without a concerted effort to make [your] mark out where it counts. Regardless of my ascerbic tone, I've said time and again the Goons deserve respect for what they've achieved (despite having a Mitt on one hand). More power to you.
Smokestack lightnin' shinin' just like gold. |
gfldex
402
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 22:35:00 -
[146] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote: Soundwave makes it clear that he wants to shake Eve to its foundations. He says, and once again a quote " I kind of hope things go terribly wrong" at 8:02 of interview. I understand he does not want to design a game for specific results (his words), but many of the changes are going to trash high sec industrial chars specifically
You capacity to misunderstand ppl is astounding.
Lets burn down Carebears-Online and rise Everlasting-Fun-Online from it's ashes. |
gfldex
402
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 22:42:00 -
[147] - Quote
Don't worry honey, the veld will stay in highsec. Maybe.
Lets burn down Carebears-Online and rise Everlasting-Fun-Online from it's ashes. |
Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1178
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 22:49:00 -
[148] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote: Datacores: If you are smart, you will cash out before Inferno. Soundwave says those words between 8:30 of the interview. He believes the datacore system is "terribly abused". Those are his words. BTW, there will be an ISK charge to get your datacores from an agent
Is this a problem?
Quote: ALL NPC bounties: At 13:45 to 15:00, a nerf of a suggested 10% across the board, all regions. Soundwave called this the "emergency button" button. Of course, at 12:50 of the interview that 10-15% of all NPC kills came out of Drone Regions. I doubt it will be a one to one ratio, but if they nerf all NPC income by 10%, yet Drones start having bounties, will not that be a wash for null sec income, but a high sec income nerf
Fallacy - it'll be a nerf to any individual's income no matter where they live.
Quote: High sec transaction taxes: At 13:28, he says empitransaction cost going up, because they want to reign in the economy. This has the biggest impact of course on the high sec players
This affects everyone equally. Do you somehow assume that people living in null sec don't have assets or something? In fact, this is a direct nerf to people like me who make most of their ISK from market whoring.
Quote: I understand he does not want to design a game for specific results (his words), but many of the changes are going to trash high sec industrial chars specifically ... I have done my time in null sec and wh's. I will not be choosing that option of joining a low sec/ null sec/ wh corp if my income gets squeezed as badly as I forsee. I will be choosing the remaining option of quitting
I see nothing that supports this viewpoint. It seems like high sec is becoming more bear friendly from my perspective. Consider the aggro and war dec changes and the blatant abuse that comes from the new AltDecShield.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Fredfredbug4
Kings of Kill EVE Animal Control
143
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 23:04:00 -
[149] - Quote
How dare they try to fix something the majority of the community has been complaining about for years! |
Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 23:04:00 -
[150] - Quote
Bubanni wrote:Hi, didn't read all of what you said... but here is the thing
High sec is not suppose to be where you can earn the most isk without much risk (besides suicide ganks) anywhere els you have to be aware of who is in local either by scanning constantly for probes on scan (in wormholes) constantly checking local in 0.0... (trying to rat in systems often camped by people with covert cynos ready to hotdrop 30 bombers on your income ships)
Risky space is suppose to be worth more than high sec, regardess of who holds it (just because it's a big alliance and coalition holding a large region or ten... doesn't make it 100% safe like high sec...
So -10% income on rats in high sec is fine. it's either that or buff it everywhere els.
Incursions too... shouldn't pay much more than a lvl 4 missions in high sec... but in low sec the payout is fine as is.
Driving a industrial with all mid slots empty in null sec to pick up your planetary production(0% taxed but 300% higher production than high sec) is the very definition of high risk.
I get cold sweats just thinking about it. |
|
Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 23:12:00 -
[151] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:To all the null sec zealots, I am certain that all these changes provide you with immense glee. But if you notice the title of the thread, it was not addressed to you.
You laugh now. You will continue to laugh as the high sec tears spread. I imagine you will continue to laugh into the early / mid fall, until CCP announces there is a drop in subscriptions.
I am looking forward to how people that have a raft of subs with chars focused on datacore production will find a way to justify keeping their accounts open. Some fellow posted in the industry forum he has quite a few accounts designed primarily for datacore farming. How many accounts pray tell will he need / feasibly run in low sec FW to get those same datacores?
And when some high sec mission runner sees his income nerfed 10%, I am sure he will have no problem just playing 10% more to gain the same income.
And when some industrialist who hates null is getting murdered trying to compete with null sec industrialists, no problem there. I am sure he will have a complete change of heart and join goons.
Plus all those incursion runner who opened up new accounts because of the income that they got from Vanguards, I am certain they will keep those accounts open.
But hey, it's OK. You zealots do your happy dance now.
It will be interesting to see if CCP is doing a happy dance as well say around October.
Quote:And when some high sec mission runner sees his income nerfed 10%, I am sure he will have no problem just playing 10% more to gain the same income.
With inflation, he must play 30-50 percent more. Cause only null-sec has access to raw inputs.
|
Caellach Marellus
Nephtys Ventures inc
463
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 23:40:00 -
[152] - Quote
Bounties nerfed because ships ae too easy to kill?
Christ why not make the ships tougher instead? And while you're at it, put sleeper AI on all the rats, even the highsec missions.
Infact I wish they'd overhaul highsec missions entirely, I run them regularly because I'm a standings ***** with an OCD to hit 10.0 with everything, I would love them to be more engaging and intuitive. Enjoy your gaming.
http://northern-goblin.blogspot.com |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 00:11:00 -
[153] - Quote
Ok, I'll take the troll-bait.
Vince Snetterton wrote:If you play a high sec game and have not seen this interview, watch it, and then make plans of moving out of high sec, or quitting the game.
...
High sec transaction taxes: At 13:28, he says empitransaction cost going up, because they want to reign in the economy. This has the biggest impact of course on the high sec players... Not true at all seeing as most null-sec residents have one or, more likely, several high-sec alts conducting commerce and industrial operations to feed their null-sec habits. Any economic changes that hit high-sec will also impact null-sec residents in one fashion or another.
Vince Snetterton wrote:... Guess the null sec power blocs are getting want they want Even though the power blocs are losing direct control of moon goo, the wealth of that moon goo is staying in null sec The high sec players are getting shafted as the overall potential wealth generation in high sec is lowered. Again, this is not correct. Null sec players have vast high-sec interests, whether they are in the trade of goods, the researching of blue prints or the manufacture of tech 2 items, that are impacted just as much as any high-sec-only player's activities.
Furthermore, just because null sec residents have control over a valuable moon material, it does not mean that they automagically gain ISK. Those materials are:
1) Used for production purposes. 2) Taken to market for sale. 3) Hoarded for sale at a later point in time when pricing might be more favorable.
Only when those goods are sold on the [high sec] market do they become monetized and moon holders enriched. At any other point, they only have the potential to be worth something.
Vince Snetterton wrote:This is of course what many of the null sec zealots have wanted for quite some time
I have done my time in null sec and wh's. I will not be choosing that option of joining a low sec/ null sec/ wh corp if my income gets squeezed as badly as I forsee. I will be choosing the remaining option of quitting. Huh? Put that tin foil hat away. CCP's "game design" aka "economic meddling" is not a desirable thing from the perspective of either high or null-sec residents. CCP's marketing term "sandbox" couldn't be further away from the truth of things with CCP's heavy hand in EVE economics and industry. Nobody wants CCP's [misguided] design efforts screwing with their gaming enjoyment.
284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |
Victor Twenty
Odyssey Space Exploration
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 00:46:00 -
[154] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:
I have done my time in null sec and wh's. I will not be choosing that option of joining a low sec/ null sec/ wh corp if my income gets squeezed as badly as I forsee. I will be choosing the remaining option of quitting
I have to completely agree! |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
440
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:06:00 -
[155] - Quote
Caellach Marellus wrote:Bounties nerfed because ships ae too easy to kill?
Christ why not make the ships tougher instead? And while you're at it, put sleeper AI on all the rats, even the highsec missions.
Infact I wish they'd overhaul highsec missions entirely, I run them regularly because I'm a standings ***** with an OCD to hit 10.0 with everything, I would love them to be more engaging and intuitive.
I will start from this.
As I posted - repeatedly - in another thread yet dumbs don't understand, there's much more to do in EvE than sweeping the dust under the rug and apply some little "rules" update here and there.
EvE had a stable and functional foundations model for a while but had a pathetically low number of subscriptions. When they wanted more, they had to change that model and that model held till 2011.
Now it's time for EvE to outlive itself again and become a proper > 500k subs MMO.
In order to do so, a LOT has to be done, not just some stupid NPC taxes to be implemented and a couple of rules to be tweaked.
The Devs have to sit down with a proper Game Designer and solve the ancient EvE shortocomings:
- Low conversion from new players to long standing players.
- EvE PvP rocks, but also sucks. Sorry if I am probably the first to say it. It has many good things but lacks many modern things. I.e. other competitive games come with an official ladders system (ELO or whatever) and support ranking of whole teams. Imagine always having an EvE TV where you can tune in and look at the best teams playing each against the other in a never ending action that ends with the official yearly tournament.
Other points where PvP is bad: takes a long time both to get a gank (i.e. put bait ship and wait... wait... wait...) and to get a "fair" fight that won't involve cynoing a blob + RR + falcon and the usual garbage. It might sound cheap or stupid but I appreciate how in other games I can log in and enter the fray and get a kill (or be killed) by 1 minute from log in time tops.
Would it hurt the "harsh cold EvE Universe with consequences" if I could risk a ship within 10 minutes instead of 1 hour?
Very low team art customization and even less personal customization. Luckily they seem to sloooowly getting there.
I won't waste more bandwidth with other 20 possible suggestions but one: individual skill. In EvE when a fight starts the involved setups may decide the outcome. This is good but adding in a far better ability to micromanage the fights would really make PvP FUN. I love positional games, strategic placement games or where there's rich "forniture" providing for shelter / denying line of sight.
EvE gets those outdated collision bubbles (seems nVidia are working with CCP on that), there's no hide and seek, too little precise dog fighting (unless you consider hysterically clicking a manual vector path as effective control).
All of the above factor certainly detract from the possible PvPers. I used to be in a PvP corp, but once I lost the ability to play video games enough, I had to resort PvPing in certainly lesser games but that give quicker action.
- Very bad, outdated, out-of reality or even sadistic knots of rules. Why the hell a PLAYER has to learn that hidden timer X in condition Y turns into Z usually with little feedback? Why is Hi sec is like it is?
Why does even hi sec exist? Was it a solution or a patch? Why didn't the game designers look at WHY people won't go out of hi sec instead of TRYING (and grandiously failing) to force them out? How comes, EvE is the one PvP game where most people do the impossible to not PvP? Why? This is the question. Why and how to make them WANT to PvP? NOT how to force them to PvP. Because making an enthusiastic playerbase want to PvP is certainly going to bring vastly better results in the long term than a majority disgruntly being forced into it.
You see? EvE has to change, has to change DEEP, not just some taxes and some wardec rules.
WTF is a wardec to begin with if not a failure? I mean, my guilds in other MMOs I play(or played) don't stop killing crap all the time and crave to challenge the "famed" other opponents.
Instead in EvE, a minority does that (and very well!), and all the rest have to be forced into PvP with such an artificial mechanism? WHY don't they want to fight? CCP has done so many questionnaires and polls in the past why not sending one to each player asking what they feel is stopping them from getting out and pew pew? They have the ability to solve such problems, just look at how well WHs solved the "I want to play 0.0 but without the usual 0.0 bull$hit" dilemma.
- Better content. No, L4 missions are neither better nor adequate nor enough nor compelling content. Incursions are a nice new concept and even push people to team together by making them want to team together. Restructure the ancient content, salvage some COSMOS something, else EvE will never attract the huge subscriptions it could.
Also, create something like PvP-in-PvE, that is PvE that can be done with full PvP readiness. Something like FW missions but less stupid. Where to get in with a PvP fit team with a mechanism making very possible to find an opposing team and who wins gets a prize enough to make them want to risk. This in other MMOs is achieved by a point system (the team who does more XYZ completes the PvE, the other team must undo or slow down such XYZ) and quite stupid AI (the current AI is therefore more than fit! ) that won't affect the PvP capability of those who get met by the incoming team.
- I won't talk about improving the UI since that would fill in a Bible. Suffice to say that making a refurbished Overview may or may not help if the new Overview should just be different and data shuffled elsewhere (i.e. a limited HUD). Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
440
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:07:00 -
[156] - Quote
- PI is as uninspiring as a bland feature may ever be. Puny worthless circlets? In 1995 there were better looking tiled 2D games.
- Bounties? Make it matter. If a guy has 3 accounts and gets a bounty, make the highest SP character of each account be randomly picked. The picked character loses half the implants.
Let's see if they will still kill themselves with their alts or friends, when they have that nice Crystal set at stake (OK less drastic solutions could work but remove the current exploitable joke).
I ran out of time but my opinion at this point should be clear. To improve and ultimately get more players, EvE needs more than a mild cleanup. It needs to sit down, brainstorm scalable and FUN mechanics that compel the players into doing stuff, not to force them. Or at least to compel 70% of the playerbase, not 30% and the rest hates the imposed rules.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:28:00 -
[157] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Once we make it impossible to place a POS in highsec this game will get interesting again. This is actually the best idea I have heard.
I like that idea. They should have to fight for POSes like everyone else does. Things are only impossible until they are not. |
MadMuppet
Kerguelen Station
189
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 01:55:00 -
[158] - Quote
I am a solo casual high-sec carebear and I am bored. I find my fun in blowing up ships and such in missions. What little industry I do is to supply me with ammo or the occasional frigate bit so that I can say that I did it myself. I am solo because I am not on consistently. I am not able to say "I will be on every night for an hour or two" so I haven't looked for a corp to make a new home.
Reading about the potential changes to high-sec, my bread and butter, being potentially nerfed to hell irked me for about 10 seconds. But when I look at it I realized that everybody else will be in the same boat. I've run out to low-sec and 0.0 and , again as a casual player, found that the reward was not worth the risk.
Nothing annoyed me more than realizing I was pinned down in a system with no hope of escape other than to log off. While the hawkers of PVP would scream 'risk aversion' at such a comment, the truth is that there is such a thing as "no ****ing chance" as well. The closest I came as making a non-high-sec better profit in solo ops was in exploring but I was often chased out of my project while trying to reap the rewards. Again, I could not fight what I had come up against, and not 'because of Falcon' but simply because ten BCs were a no contest win again an exploring Loki
Those that want to hawk 'This is an MMO and you don't get it" are partially right, but this game has a commitment level that is not conductive to a casual player. The joys of 0.0 and the endless CTAs or ice mining ops were early on in my career, it was as thrilling as watching my snot dry on a tissue.
I say bring on the high-sec nerf bat. If they make the reward worth the risk to leave high-sec, I will consider it, but right now there is little to no point. I have had to rebuild my personal fleet from nothing before, I even did it entirely in low-sec once, but it just seemed nothing more than a more paranoid version of mission running in high-sec with a slightly better reward (per mission/site, not time invested) where the only real challenge was dodging the occasional blob or finding away around the gateway gate camp.
Like I said, bring it. Worst case I run out of patients or isk and leave. I don't always finish my commentary, but when I do |
Conu Leonida
Ex 24.7 v3
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 06:07:00 -
[159] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:How quickly we go from "It's a sandbox. Do what you want." TO "EVE is supposed to be a....(insert ill-considered, self-centered definition.)" This is why few of these people can be trusted. It's not that they're dishonest (which most of them are). It's that they can't juggle complicated things in their minds. It's got to be all THIS or all THAT with them.
The MAJORITY (which isn't you Goonwaffle) subscribes (with money) to the notion it's a SANDBOX. It's not hard to visualize the really good and experienced players (Read: YOU Goonwaffles) have evolved a game for themselves that allow them to set up their own dynasties in null sec. Low sec players [can] be situated in between the beginners and the pros, too good to be in hi sec, not quite organized enough to move into null.
Precisely. +1
EVE being a sandbox means having every kind of activities and letting players decide what to do in EVE. People have a crapload of activities to choose from and reducing the game to a pvp-centric game will take away the sandbox just as well as removing the pvp-part of the game.
We can't all be pvp-ers as we can't all be carebears. Simple as that and the game needs both. |
Sevena Black
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 12:55:00 -
[160] - Quote
Based on what I'm reading, the OP seems a current generation individual; badly informed, quick to judge and probably extremely easily swayed by arguments that fit his view of the world. A sad but very modern attitude
I feel there are two things going on in EVE
1: Globalization
A natural evolution into powerblocks. If you remember or know European history, you'll see a very clear example of how this sort of thing works
A small group owns a piece of land. A knight and his peasents for example. Several knights band together to kick a neigbouring knight off his land A large group of knights unite under a Kin Several kings are "united" beneath an Emperor
Or: provinces -> nations -> countries -> regions -> continent Any idea how many "blues" Europe has ? What about its cooperation with the United States. The fundamentalists have been screaming for a nerf for ages :)
2: Changing attitude in players
The OP has some of the charecteristics of a modern mindset, but "instantgratification" seems the most complete one I've read sofar. I will provide an explanation of how I feel this is most clearly seen About 2 months ago I was docked in null-sec. A group of 3 neuts jumped in. At that point I didn't care since I wasn't planning on leaving the station. Intel was buzzing tho. People wanted to get rid of them. So after 10 minutes I asked: "What do you need?", expecting something like Rapier, cane etc. What they said was: "a gang". Seriously. Not a single dude that was whining DID anything. It ended up with me leading a fleet (and failing horribly) My point: I feel more and more people want things handed to them on a silver platter
TL;DR: If this post is too long for you, it was never meant for you in the first place, so don't worry. |
|
Vince Snetterton
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 13:58:00 -
[161] - Quote
Sevena Black wrote:
The OP has some of the charecteristics of a modern mindset, but "instantgratification" seems the most complete one I've read sofar..
You have one bizarre view of instant gratification. If you think the weeks of work researching, then getting the data core skills, the research management skills, then the grinding of standings to get access to L4 R&D agents for multiple chars is "instant gratification", you are clearly out of your mind.
Also, try setting up some industry where in some cases it takes months to research blueprints to profitability, and then get back to me about "instant gratification".
Idiot. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
555
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 14:01:00 -
[162] - Quote
lmao the hard work of datacore R&D
get the **** out of here |
Sevena Black
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 15:24:00 -
[163] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:
Idiot.
Proves my point very obvious. Thank you. |
Blastcaps Madullier
Celestial Horizon Corp. Flatline.
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 15:59:00 -
[164] - Quote
Some null sec regions don't need the bounty's nerfing, syndicate being a prime example as anyone who's ever lived there, the words isk making and syndicate don't belong in the same sentence (quote from brent, rote) wether the planetary ring mining idea will change that remains to be seen.
|
Marduk Nibiru
Physical Chaos
98
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 16:13:00 -
[165] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:Sevena Black wrote:
The OP has some of the charecteristics of a modern mindset, but "instantgratification" seems the most complete one I've read sofar..
You have one bizarre view of instant gratification. If you think the weeks of work researching, then getting the data core skills, the research management skills, then the grinding of standings to get access to L4 R&D agents for multiple chars is "instant gratification", you are clearly out of your mind. Also, try setting up some industry where in some cases it takes months to research blueprints to profitability, and then get back to me about "instant gratification". Idiot.
Yeah, it's sad. I only recently set about to actually grinding all the standings I needed and getting some alts up to R&D along with me. Now, right about when I'm seeing the point of return...it's going away. I'm still going to max out as much as I can and grab what I can before the change, but it's disappointing. Just about every time I find a way to make some ISK to support my spaceship smoking habit....something crushes my plans.
It's cool though. I'll adapt. Maybe I will make 80k an hour instead of 150k an hour per toon. Maybe I'll have to do something else. Maybe I'll take my little frigate nightmare and join the militia. Was something I'd thought of anyway just to get a hisec-pos up.
That said, I think I'll still be able to make ISK even if the R&D thing falls through completely. It's my secondary. My primary is a T2 production toon I'm brewing. Not knowing wtf I was doing I researched my BPO's before inventing...which was apparently a waste of time...but still. About 5 months from startup, and I was scatter brained about it like always, I'll be pushing out T2 ammo and making 200k an hour or so. When I get into the large ammo's and modules and crap I'll very likely make quite a bit more.
Even I can't loose 200k in an hour getting killed repeatedly.
So while my plans to become rich might soon be destroyed, as always, I'm sure I can still have fun. Besides, you get more out of it when losses hurt. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |