EVE Search - Big 0.0 Revamp Thread - Incentivizing 0.0 and stuff

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Assembly Hall

Big 0.0 Revamp Thread - Incentivizing 0.0 and stuff

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cindy McCain GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.28 23:57:00 - [61] Supporting this
Stretchmeat Crotchquake GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.28 23:57:00 - [62] Edited by: Stretchmeat Crotchquake on 29/12/2008 00:03:51 Edited by: Stretchmeat Crotchquake on 29/12/2008 00:02:26 Originally by: Darius JOHNSON Postin to support dis Reported for spamming. Other thoughts I've seen on this: - Stacking penalty to reinforced timers, i.e. 25% penalty to the reinforced timer every time it's reinforced, which goes down by 25% if it stays above 50% shields for 24 hours. 4 straight reinforces with no let-up = Time to watch the tower burn. Weakening the defensibility of cyno jammers: - Major increase in the fitting requirements for cyno jammers so they can't be mounted on deathstars. - Cyno jammer up = Jump bridge and cyno beacon go offline. - Doomsdays --> Single-target instagib cannon. - Deterioration of sov 3 if neighboring systems are taken.
ArmyOfMe 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.28 23:59:00 - [63] Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 29/12/2008 00:01:01 Glad to see this topic being raised. but i would really love to see a way that makes it harder to hold a large number of regions for a single alliance. As it is now its to hard for small alliances to claim 0,0 space, so whatever work that gets done to 0,0 i hope will be made to help smaller alliances as well. Imo ccp should have removed moon mining and all forms of static income from 0,0 as thats the main reason alliances claim as much space as they do. an alliances income should come from taxes, not moon mining Originally by: deadmaus Because by the time we had calmed Plague down after he heard BoB were back in the vicinity it was too late to do anything
Thingul Sindacolla GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:01:00 - [64]
Avulsion Duragon Pioneer Group GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:03:00 - [65] Right now, I make my isk in empire and spend it on 0.0 warfare. The 0.0 pvp is fun, but not very financially rewarding. ______________ \| Too Damn Big \|
Talzaris GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:05:00 - [66] Edited by: Talzaris on 29/12/2008 00:04:55 The fact that you can make more money in empire by running missions where there's practically no risk versus anything else in 0.0 other than high-end moon mining (which most individual players don't do, only their alliances) is idiotic. CCP desperately needs to make 0.0 more profitable to the average space-holding player, which will in turn encourage more people to want to inhabit 0.0 and create more pvp interaction.
jm24 GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:06:00 - [67]
Frabba GoonFleet	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:06:00 - [68] I, too, support this topic.
Danny Centurai hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:06:00 - [69] Sounds good to me.
Cailais Amarr 0utbreak	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:06:00 - [70] The way I see it at the moment its a fairly transparent problem; The 'wealth' of .0 and the Soveriegnty (read: ownership) of .0 are both tied up with the POS - which itself is a static, "bunker'esq" mechanic. Decouple Sov from the POS, and shift the wealth off the moons and into 'open space' (i.e the belts, or similar open environment) and bingo: problem solved. The POS will still remain a industrial cog, and moon mining might be a part of that - but if you could get moon minerals from the belts themselves... C. Originally by: Capa So if you wake up one morning and it's a particularly beautiful day, you'll know we made it.

ardik GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:06:00 - [71] Originally by: ArmyOfMe Imo ccp should have removed moon mining and all forms of static income from 0,0 as thats the main reason alliances claim as much space as they do. Oh yeah that sounds **ing ace, let's remove everything that can be fought over and just run around in pseudo missions in deadspaces that can only be probed out if you have an hour or two to spare. That's the shot of adrenaline 0.0 needs, oh yeah, right in the **ing eye bro
The German	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:07:00 - [72] I SUPPORT THIS
Mikel Banks	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:07:00 - [73] change is good
TheFrabbot	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:07:00 - [74] I, too, support this topic.
Sett AtOn 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:08:00 - [75] Spot on, thumbs up. Glad to see certain questions are being answered.
Insurance Risk Duragon Pioneer Group GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:09:00 - [76] Anything is better than the current system.
Althair Erin GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:10:00 - [77] This has my full support -------------- The Hope of the younger generation Come help build a better, more civil EVE!
Kahlan Draith	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:10:00 - [78] thumbs up
Felonious Pirate The Arrow Project Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:11:00 - [79] Edited by: Felonious Pirate on 29/12/2008 00:12:33 It's a good start, but believe me there is a lot more that could be changed in EVE especially in 0.0 circumstances, the current pos changes are a step in the right direct; however, that is one element to 0.0 and you should consider all angles to this, ratting, PVP, game mechanics, outposts, mining etc....
Ji Jiang	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:12:00 - [80] Edited by: Ji Jiang on 29/12/2008 00:11:45 I endorse this idea.

Marzzola Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:13:00 - [81]
Telemedia Superhero	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:13:00 - [82] As things stand, a NPC corp raven ratting alt makes more isk/hr than most of the people who actually fight for 0.0 territory. Sov is a tremendous time and isk sink with little advantage compared to the isk farmers' tactics of simply squatting in someone else's space with a cloaking raven.
TakeTheDoom Fate of Norns	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:14:00 - [83] I support this
StaticW Fate of Norns	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:15:00 - [84] Great Stuff!
Reapeat Offender GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:15:00 - [85] 0.0 life needs some attention from CCP. What has been proposed here is a great place to start.
Thorin Green	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:15:00 - [86] Definitely need changes. And don't forget Empire lowsec.
Duran Bolivar Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:15:00 - [87] I support this!
Serenity Gent	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:16:00 - [88] i support this idea
Trzzbk GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:16:00 - [89] I supported this at the roundtable in Iceland and I support it now. DARIUS JOHNSON MY CEO
Ugor Batarr Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2008.12.29 00:17:00 - [90] Supporting the suggestions 'cause Vuk said I have to bend ova if I don't Nah, seriously, I like it. It's time things change in 0.0.



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.