| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
401. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Semkhet ...Pimped RR BS's are as efficient as nanoships... There are the occasional gang like this however the vast majority appear to be nanos. There used to be gangs of pimped ceptors however those also are mostly obso...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.24 18:30:00
|
402. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Reem Fairchild It's like saying: "ECM ships are overpowered because they make ships unable to lock". ECM makes it unlikely to lock, but not unable to lock. There are reasonable counters that nearly any ship can use wit...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.20 21:12:00
|
403. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Reem Fairchild One person says "you can't hit them, it's God mode" ... "you can but it doesn't matter cause they'll just run if you do" ... they are meant to be good at (running) ... "yes, but you can't hit them, it's God mo...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.20 19:32:00
|
404. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 20/03/2008 19:01:04 Originally by: Ephemeron I want to get a clear understanding: what exactly are you trying to kill nanoships with? You've got it reversed. Its what do I want nanoships to be killed by. *...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.20 18:58:00
|
405. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Reem Fairchild Cruiser sized guns, with a couple of tracking mods, *will* track them easily. As will frig guns. Also a titan doomsday can hit them. However neither are very effective. It doesn't really matter if it ca...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.20 18:12:00
|
406. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 20/03/2008 16:31:24 Originally by: Matrixcvd Your comments aren't accurate to the greater world of PVP and neither is your assesment So you can't form a proper argument and instead use a personal attack? Ni...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.20 16:30:00
|
407. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Reem Fairchild Wait, you admitted that they will be able to put effective fire on them in this way, you probably know that they are paper-thin ships, Nearly have to kill them in the alpha strike. Mine have about 10k raw...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.20 04:25:00
|
408. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron It costs more because it is better. If speed related modules are that highly in demand doesn't that indicate a problem with balance? You've acknowlodged that speed related fittings are some of the best in game...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.19 23:27:00
|
409. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dianeces Originally by: Hermosa Diosas webifier bubbles? Won't work. (Hint: you're still slower than nanoships.) Same issue applies with the webber concept. Even without polycarbs nanos are hard to catch. ...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.19 22:00:00
|
410. The Nano Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 19/03/2008 21:28:13 Originally by: ApaKaka Field a ****ty T1 cruiser against a 250mil+ isk ship + 800 mil in implants? Hell yes, I should be able to dictate when to disengage in a nanosetup. Just because i...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.03.19 21:26:00
|
411. You walk into a dark room.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 20/02/2008 02:49:34 Originally by: Le Skunk What do you think the chances of you getting out of that room would be. If the room isn't a mausoleum, I'd say pretty good. Someone will have to collect the bit...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.02.20 02:49:00
|
412. What did you speand your first billion on? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I spent a lot of isk on booze, birds and fast ships. The rest I just squandered.
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.02.15 17:40:00
|
413. Regarding cloaking ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jesum Is there a way to find cloaked ships without brute forcing? Have you tried yelling: "Marco!" ?
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.01.30 21:07:00
|
414. Where do we stand with stasis webifiers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gazghkull Edited by: Gazghkull on 27/01/2008 20:08:42 Speed tanked ships provide a way of harassing a camp ... campers have HICs now too ... risk free ... expensive ships ... Outside of low sec, most campers use nano...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.01.27 20:51:00
|
415. Where do we stand with stasis webifiers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Alyth ...level 5 minmtar recon packing dual webs ... will stop that vagabond dead? Because even with level 5 recon and double webs most speed tanked ships will make it back to the gate. Webbing doesn't work very often as...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.01.27 17:32:00
|
416. How Dangerous is Low-sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 25/01/2008 00:49:43 Originally by: Bria Xun is low-sec space really as dangerous as all the horror stories I've heard make it out to be? If you don't pay attention it can be worse than you think. You need t...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.01.25 00:48:00
|
417. A sad story about pvp - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: pastafarianist Our gang, 20 man strong, 8 battleships + support. ...whose local, including us, was close to 50. So you've got 20, and they've got 30 * about 20%-30% active & pvp ready (rest will be afk, usually 60-80% o...
- by Crackzilla - at 2008.01.22 01:16:00
|
418. consitency on why we fight over 0.0 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
To brag in COAD! When that is nerfed, what we have left? Nerf empire. For making isk, theres little reason to hit 0.0.
- by Crackzilla - at 2007.12.18 23:04:00
|
419. EVE-Online + Widescreen? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 18/12/2007 01:58:21 Originally by: Elhina Novae playing at 1280 x 1024. Stretched? Game handles high res an widescreen quite nice. Only complaint is at high res the fonts are small. Not a biggie. 2560x16...
- by Crackzilla - at 2007.12.18 01:57:00
|
420. This Sucks (extremely poor fps rate) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: *****zilla on 17/12/2007 06:07:13 Originally by: Zavernus Hamarabi I'm alt tabbed out right now. Eve is using 318 megs of memory, and 70 percent of the cpu just sitting here. Normal. Machine is probably a few years ol...
- by Crackzilla - at 2007.12.17 06:05:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |