Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
141. Incursion Supercarrier Fighter Bomber Nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
/"cough" Blog .
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.27 18:45:00
|
142. A message to the EVE Online player base - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There is no box.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.27 00:22:00
|
143. Complete SISI revert? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Snowmann on 26/10/2010 23:58:22 Originally by: SXYGeeK ...my bet is on early December. Quote: Reykjavik, Iceland û September 21, 2010 û CCP, one of the worldÆs leading independent game developers, has announced a n...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.26 23:56:00
|
144. Cloaking Ping for SOV - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: July Shine AFK Cloaking Risk = 0% Reward = 100% This would be more accurate to "afk cloaking" Risk = 0% Reward = 0% Hence, the name.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.26 22:56:00
|
145. Female Avatars, guy players - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ghoest If thats your best argument I win. I would guess that if the "case" you are making was judged by a jury of your peers(fellow forum dudes/dudetes), you wouldn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. But that's just ...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.26 21:40:00
|
146. Hidden problems greefers exploit and get away with it - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Anytime I fly a 234k EFH Abaddon on Sisi, it only takes ~88k damage on the killmail.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.26 01:03:00
|
147. Female Avatars, guy players - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Snowmann on 26/10/2010 00:57:46 Originally by: Emperor Cheney Eve is a game, like checkers. Games don't necessarily involve pretending to be anyone. My character is a character, not me. This is a distinction that many re...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.26 00:56:00
|
148. Sansha attack live event: CCP doing a good job - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybe the Sansha pilot didn't get the relevant memo.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.26 00:43:00
|
149. Carrier in high sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Saju Somtaaw FYI killmails can be faked... Or from Sisi... Which is neither fake, nor valid.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 22:44:00
|
150. SC's and new Titans created MAD? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: 000Hunter000 So does this mean that ccp needs to put something in the game to make that dreadnoughtfleet (read supercapitals) obsolete? Just like what happened in WW2 when aircraft carriers and long range bombers were introd...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 19:47:00
|
151. Request for a response by CCP to the Art Contest challenges - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Stick Cult I don't feel like reading through threadnaughts, how did Deviantart not adhere to the rules? From the limited reading I've done it seems that some didn't like who the winners and losers were, so they made a st...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 19:36:00
|
152. Scaling webifier strength. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Hentes Zsemle Webbed and scrambled, and a battlecruiser... that means it was going like 100 meters a sec around the battleship's optimal, and it could speedtank it. No, its not working as intended. It's a Minnie ship. Sh...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 18:52:00
|
153. EVE client = terrible. Crashes. I can't play. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Apertalus The client has so many bugs and hang-ups, like when I try to complete or accept a mission from an agent, the window always makes me select "view mission" or whatever first, like the mission is a secret or somethi...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 18:40:00
|
154. SC's and new Titans created MAD? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You mean like the fear many countries had after the Battle of Jutland? The fear of losing so much so quick? Makes sense. Don't see the issue.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 18:20:00
|
155. Complete SISI revert? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Morgenholt Blue ...while they try to make sure that system brings as few new bugs as reasonably possible . Yes, a new 64bit Item-ID system is currently being tested, and fixed it for ya.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.25 05:49:00
|
156. what a minute, the new character creator can not come out without tats - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tonto Auri How about someone actually READ when devs write? Dude, you just went too far. Eventhough that would clear up at least 80% of the issues on these forums, you are asking too much. Why would we as a group spen...
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.24 18:57:00
|
157. Bumping is a broken mechanic - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bumping used to be far worse. Size wasn't taken in account before to determine how much a ship gets bumped. Oh yea, wrecks used to be an issue too.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.23 21:41:00
|
158. Ambulation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Feilamya All this walking stuff is a step in the wrong direction... I think it's the first step in a different and potentially far more exciting direction.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.23 18:35:00
|
159. Wormhole sapce = offline poses a solution - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think you are looking for this sub-forum.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.23 06:51:00
|
160. Ambulation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's been slated for spring/summer 2011 relase.
- by Snowmann - at 2010.10.23 00:00:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |