Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Totally Slick
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 19:09:00 -
[151]
the idea that anyone at ccp or any one who volunteers for ccp could cheat is just so ridiculous that I won't even acknowledge the possibility that it could happen |
britishfish
Minmatar Gladiators of Rage Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 20:09:00 -
[152]
Originally by: NeoTheo lol whineswarm ;)
made me laugh cheers
|
General Windypops
Gallente Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 20:37:00 -
[153]
This is absolutely class. A 5 page hissyfit tantrum about why they're not taken seriously. It's a delight to see how desperately they crave the attention these days.
A couple of observations as to why you aren't getting any news coverage:
- Camping some stations for a month and getting almost no kills isn't newsworthy. Sorry about that. - You're probably right that more of the volunteers have sympathies with Kenzoku. I reckon that's because BoB and its allies are the kind of people who take a constructive attitude to this game, and who contribute and volunteer to make it a better and more interesting place. That's why they're more popular than you.
If you care so much about that tiny little box you see when you log in, then take five minutes out from copying each others forum memes and write an article. Do something constructive rather than having yet another tantrum.
|
Totally Slick
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 20:54:00 -
[154]
yeah non biased news is too much to ask for |
General Windypops
Gallente Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:01:00 -
[155]
Edited by: General Windypops on 18/03/2009 21:01:10
Originally by: Totally Slick yeah non biased news is too much to ask for
It's about interest not bias. Kenzoku and allies staging fight back and kicking ass? Interesting. Goonswarm sit for a month bored off their arses in a system? Mindblowingly tedious.
I think it's amusing that you care so much about what the community think of you though. How dare they not celebrate your achievements??? After all you've done for them!!!
|
Hubris
Minmatar Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:06:00 -
[156]
Originally by: General Windypops You're probably right that more of the volunteers have sympathies with Kenzoku. I reckon that's because BoB and its allies are the kind of people who take a constructive attitude to this game, and who contribute and volunteer to make it a better and more interesting place.
:sarcasm: They constructively started large scale metagaming and high level cheating in eve. They also contributed the cause of the largest bad press CCP have gotten. :sarcasm: -
|
General Windypops
Gallente Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:13:00 -
[157]
Originally by: Hubris
Originally by: General Windypops You're probably right that more of the volunteers have sympathies with Kenzoku. I reckon that's because BoB and its allies are the kind of people who take a constructive attitude to this game, and who contribute and volunteer to make it a better and more interesting place.
:sarcasm: They constructively started large scale metagaming and high level cheating in eve. They also contributed the cause of the largest bad press CCP have gotten. :sarcasm:
Yeah you've been making those claims for 3 years now. Yet it's still your side that are raging emo about losing the popularity contest in an internet spaceship game? Go figure.
|
Totally Slick
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:19:00 -
[158]
Edited by: Totally Slick on 18/03/2009 21:21:04 it's amusing that you bring up ~the community~ teh community this~~ the community~ that the community couldn't be reached for a comment they said they were busy running level 4 missions
Originally by: Hubris
:sarcasm: They constructively started large scale metagaming and high level cheating in eve. They also contributed the cause of the largest bad press CCP have gotten. :sarcasm:
what is your beef with cheaters man nobody cares about cheaters any longer live and let live! |
Iva Soreass
Caldari Blind Violence
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:25:00 -
[159]
Holy hole in a doughnut batman, look at all the pubbie goon tear's.
|
Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:41:00 -
[160]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 18/03/2009 21:46:00 nvm, it's really not worth it
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
|
The Mittani
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 21:57:00 -
[161]
i think you may be mistaking the intentional delegitimation of an outlet for whining but w/e nbd~
it happened to caod and now it seems to be isd's turn
|
Spiffy Sunkist
Gallente Malevolent Evolution The Church.
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:00:00 -
[162]
They don't get their attention from the momys so now they needz it from ISD. Sad^^
|
Two Beans
Gallente GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:04:00 -
[163]
Wait, there's news reports on the login screen? _____________ His Royal Highness King Two Beans King of CAOD
|
General Windypops
Gallente Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:26:00 -
[164]
Edited by: General Windypops on 18/03/2009 22:26:48
Originally by: The Mittani i think you may be mistaking the intentional delegitimation of an outlet for whining but w/e nbd~
it happened to caod and now it seems to be isd's turn
Oh ok, you might want to get the guys to work on their posting technique then, because it was coming across all aggro-needy, rather than laid-back cynicism. I'm fairly sure some of your newer goons misread the situation and were taking it all a bit seriously too so you might want to have a word just saying.
|
Illiya
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:33:00 -
[165]
this isn't anything when it comes to posting.
you want goon posting to really take off? add a postcount underneath our avatars. Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Mitnal |
Chairman Lmao
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:38:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Illiya this isn't anything when it comes to posting.
you want goon posting to really take off? add a postcount underneath our avatars.
never stop believing never stop posting
|
Rodj Blake
Amarr PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:39:00 -
[167]
Originally by: The Mittani i think you may be mistaking the intentional delegitimation of an outlet for whining but w/e nbd~
Thanks for confirming that for us.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Jade Constantine
Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:08:00 -
[168]
Originally by: Totally Slick the idea that anyone at ccp or any one who volunteers for ccp could cheat is just so ridiculous that I won't even acknowledge the possibility that it could happen
I think you are on pretty rocky ground here goonswarm. Since in the eyes of many Eve players your current "squatting" on the Band of Brothers corp name for the purpose of blocking the re-creation of an established player alliance name is something that certainly looks like a breach of the rules and the fact that CCP haven't already forcibly renamed the goonswarm "band of brothers alt corp" to "corporation 112113131331" looks as much as anything like a biased position in your favour...
It is ridiculous that corporation naming can block alliance naming in the first place - but wilfully doing this to cause grief and upset by denying an existing player entity its established in-game identity is something that many consider beyond the pale of reasonable gameplay. By this deed goonswarm directors displayed their intention to remove history from the game and exploit poor game mechanics to do it.
Got to say if I was still on the CSM I'd be for bringing this matter up to CCP as a matter of principle, since I think failing to rectify this situation when there is a past record of impersonation characters and entities being removed is poor form.
So at this point goonswarm complaining about CCP bias is laughable at best. You are abusing the alliance/corporation naming system for cheap morale damage against other paying Eve players and it doesn't look good.
ISSUE - Bring Space Bushido to CAOD |
Flinx Evenstar
Minmatar North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:13:00 -
[169]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Got to say if I was still on the CSM I'd be for bringing this matter up to CCP as a matter of principle, since I think failing to rectify this situation when there is a past record of impersonation characters and entities being removed is poor form.
The CSM really needs to spend more time going round in circles arguing over principles. You should re apply, the guy that took the minutes has recovered from his RSI
Kenny didn't own the name, and when it was no longer in use, anyone was free to use it. Hi, my name is Flinx, and I am a recovering nano***
|
Mo adib
Amarr Titan Industries Technology Team
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:15:00 -
[170]
Edited by: Mo adib on 18/03/2009 23:17:04
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Totally Slick the idea that anyone at ccp or any one who volunteers for ccp could cheat is just so ridiculous that I won't even acknowledge the possibility that it could happen
I think you are on pretty rocky ground here goonswarm. Since in the eyes of many Eve players your current "squatting" on the Band of Brothers corp name for the purpose of blocking the re-creation of an established player alliance name is something that certainly looks like a breach of the rules and the fact that CCP haven't already forcibly renamed the goonswarm "band of brothers alt corp" to "corporation 112113131331" looks as much as anything like a biased position in your favour...
It is ridiculous that corporation naming can block alliance naming in the first place - but wilfully doing this to cause grief and upset by denying an existing player entity its established in-game identity is something that many consider beyond the pale of reasonable gameplay. By this deed goonswarm directors displayed their intention to remove history from the game and exploit poor game mechanics to do it.
Got to say if I was still on the CSM I'd be for bringing this matter up to CCP as a matter of principle, since I think failing to rectify this situation when there is a past record of impersonation characters and entities being removed is poor form.
So at this point goonswarm complaining about CCP bias is laughable at best. You are abusing the alliance/corporation naming system for cheap morale damage against other paying Eve players and it doesn't look good.
before you get all righteous about how the evil goonies have done so wrong by utterly destroying their enemy u might want to look and see that the same side was attempting to do the same thing at the same time, infact they were even more open about it.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=980800
The fact that this is still on the first page when you are talking about it is rather embarassing though :/
dont throw stones when living in glass houses and what not.
edit: and god dont bring up your CSM time, that just proved how worthless of a PR bit the entire CSM thing was. Take a hint, you were not chosen again in any fashion.
|
|
SK Rooster
Gallente No Trademark
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:20:00 -
[171]
Originally by: General Windypops This is absolutely class. A 5 page hissyfit tantrum about why they're not taken seriously. It's a delight to see how desperately they crave the attention these days.
A couple of observations as to why you aren't getting any news coverage:
- Camping some stations for a month and getting almost no kills isn't newsworthy. Sorry about that. - You're probably right that more of the volunteers have sympathies with Kenzoku. I reckon that's because BoB and its allies are the kind of people who take a constructive attitude to this game, and who contribute and volunteer to make it a better and more interesting place. That's why they're more popular than you.
If you care so much about that tiny little box you see when you log in, then take five minutes out from copying each others forum memes and write an article. Do something constructive rather than having yet another tantrum.
|
Jade Constantine
Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:21:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Mo adib Edited by: Mo adib on 18/03/2009 23:17:04
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Totally Slick the idea that anyone at ccp or any one who volunteers for ccp could cheat is just so ridiculous that I won't even acknowledge the possibility that it could happen
I think you are on pretty rocky ground here goonswarm. Since in the eyes of many Eve players your current "squatting" on the Band of Brothers corp name for the purpose of blocking the re-creation of an established player alliance name is something that certainly looks like a breach of the rules and the fact that CCP haven't already forcibly renamed the goonswarm "band of brothers alt corp" to "corporation 112113131331" looks as much as anything like a biased position in your favour...
It is ridiculous that corporation naming can block alliance naming in the first place - but wilfully doing this to cause grief and upset by denying an existing player entity its established in-game identity is something that many consider beyond the pale of reasonable gameplay. By this deed goonswarm directors displayed their intention to remove history from the game and exploit poor game mechanics to do it.
Got to say if I was still on the CSM I'd be for bringing this matter up to CCP as a matter of principle, since I think failing to rectify this situation when there is a past record of impersonation characters and entities being removed is poor form.
So at this point goonswarm complaining about CCP bias is laughable at best. You are abusing the alliance/corporation naming system for cheap morale damage against other paying Eve players and it doesn't look good.
before you get all righteous about how the evil goonies have done so wrong by utterly destroying their enemy u might want to look and see that the same side was attempting to do the same thing at the same time, infact they were even more open about it.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=980800
The fact that this is still on the first page when you are talking about it is rather embarassing though :/
dont throw stones when living in glass houses and what not.
edit: and god dont bring up your CSM time, that just proved how worthless of a PR bit the entire CSM thing was. Take a hint, you were not chosen again in any fashion.
Well not being chosen again might have had something to do with me not running again Unlike some I decided to wait until the issues I'd championed first time around actually got into the game before standing for re-election. (call me old-fashioned like that).
But on the point you raise about that AAA post. I honestly couldn't care less about it. Two wrongs don't make a right. If somebody had stolen the goonswarm name and squatted on it with an alt corp I'd support you guys getting it back. I don't believe the game of Eve should contain the kind of meta-gaming that can deny a group of players the identity they have established by cheaply creating alt-corps to block alliance naming.
On this issue I'm pro fair play and against cheesy game-mechanic exploitation whoever it benefits and whoever it harms. Take it or leave it.
ISSUE - Bring Space Bushido to CAOD |
SK Rooster
Gallente No Trademark
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:23:00 -
[173]
Originally by: The Mittani i think you may be mistaking the intentional delegitimation of an outlet for whining but w/e nbd~
it happened to caod and now it seems to be isd's turn
yes please lets take ISD and instead of putting goonswarm effort to try to improve it we will just whine about it until all the volunteers emo rage quit, gg
|
Jade Constantine
Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:25:00 -
[174]
Edited by: Jade Constantine on 18/03/2009 23:26:01
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Kenny didn't own the name, and when it was no longer in use, anyone was free to use it.
Thats a poor argument and you know it.
Why then does an alliance that forgets to pay the bill and has a 3rd party "steal" the name in the interim get to petition and recover their name down the road?
You gained the advantage the alliance disbanding allowed you in zero'ing all BOB sovereignty and allowing the conquest of Delve.
Squatting on the Band of Brothers name and using it as an alt corp CAOD spamming entity is just taking the mickey.
If it had been any other alliances than Band of Brothers and Goonswarm involved I strongly suspect this would already have been resolved and the name returned.
ISSUE - Bring Space Bushido to CAOD |
Etho Demerzel
Gallente Holy Clan of the Cone
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:30:00 -
[175]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
But on the point you raise about that AAA post. I honestly couldn't care less about it. Two wrongs don't make a right. If somebody had stolen the goonswarm name and squatted on it with an alt corp I'd support you guys getting it back. I don't believe the game of Eve should contain the kind of meta-gaming that can deny a group of players the identity they have established by cheaply creating alt-corps to block alliance naming.
On this issue I'm pro fair play and against cheesy game-mechanic exploitation whoever it benefits and whoever it harms. Take it or leave it.
There is no wrong int his game. Things like scamming, harassing and griefing are not only allowed but activelly encouraged. There is nothing remotely resembling fairplay in Eve, even because fairplay is a very hard thing to define.
Metagame has been used by all successful alliances in this game on occasion. Bob before being hit by this very aspect of the game even bragged about their use of it.
Basically you are talking nonsense just because you have emotional problems with goons. That is your problem, mate, but by continuing to spew absurdities here you just make yourself look stupid (even more than you usually do, really) =====
"If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs." - CCP kieron... |
Twoside
Gallente Thundercats RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:31:00 -
[176]
Originally by: General Windypops (...) It's a delight to see how desperately they crave the attention these days. (...)
Never change windy. never change :) |
Twoside
Gallente Thundercats RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:32:00 -
[177]
Originally by: SK Rooster PS cry more goons, PL and NC
u mad?? |
Etho Demerzel
Gallente Holy Clan of the Cone
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:35:00 -
[178]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 18/03/2009 23:35:04
Originally by: Jade Constantine Thats a poor argument and you know it.
Why then does an alliance that forgets to pay the bill and has a 3rd party "steal" the name in the interim get to petition and recover their name down the road?
This alliance didn't forget to pay the bills. It was dissolved by someone that WITHIN game rules was able to do it. From this point on the name is free game. CCP seems to agree with me, considering they let it stay as it is. Basically it does only hurt YOUR distorted sense of ethics. So, again, your problem.
Quote:
If it had been any other alliances than Band of Brothers and Goonswarm involved I strongly suspect this would already have been resolved and the name returned.
If the rainbows dropped lollipops I suspect Leprechauns would exist. =====
"If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs." - CCP kieron... |
Mo adib
Amarr Titan Industries Technology Team
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:35:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Jade Constantine words
Don't say "you guys" like I am a member or have ever been a member of goonswarm. My corp history is fairly simple and you are free to look it up whenever you like. I have been in both of the current powerblocs and trying to label me as one or the other is a way to dismiss any arguments I make and a sad one at that.
As to your line of argument, if Goonswarm would have spent the billion and just remade an alliance with the band of brothers name you wouldnt have any complaint about it?
Tbh through metagaming that was largely introduced to this game via these people, their name was taken from them without violating any of the EULA, as far as I am concerned goons now own that name.
Also of a side note, that post is made by one alt of Jake Noble(lol apparently ccp dont ban all alt posters) who other then being a former high ranking member in band of brothers and still influential liason to BOB and AAA, so my point in raising the post was that it was infact a GBC post and the irony of them losing their name so recently after such a disgusting attempt and metagaming is a hilarious event of the highest order.
|
Reverand Pastor
Caldari DEATHFUNK Doctrine.
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:36:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Jade Constantine Edited by: Jade Constantine on 18/03/2009 23:26:01
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Kenny didn't own the name, and when it was no longer in use, anyone was free to use it.
Thats a poor argument and you know it.
Why then does an alliance that forgets to pay the bill and has a 3rd party "steal" the name in the interim get to petition and recover their name down the road?
You gained the advantage the alliance disbanding allowed you in zero'ing all BOB sovereignty and allowing the conquest of Delve.
Squatting on the Band of Brothers name and using it as an alt corp CAOD spamming entity is just taking the mickey.
If it had been any other alliances than Band of Brothers and Goonswarm involved I strongly suspect this would already have been resolved and the name returned.
It doesnt take a goon to see how full of crap you are. nobody needs you to whiteknight for them and i hope your a ken alt with the bias you show in every goon thread. even the terrible ones(wich is 90% of them)
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |