| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kade Jeekin
Kinda'Shujaa
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 19:17:00 -
[151] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
Bottom line is Raa was lost without a fight due to station lock outs. If we could still dock in lost systems we could have planted a bunch of plexing ships there. That way even if we lost the system that effort wouldn't be wasted because we could still use those ships to start offensive plexing and starting to take it back. However with the current mechanic if we moved ships there it would have had a large potential to be a wasted effort and lead to us having to move all that stuff back out again.
(Docking in mehator is not an option for the low sec status pilots and even if that weren't a problem that gate could be easilly camped.)
Raa has no stations for you to have been locked out of. Build a POS.
Veshta Yoshida wrote: Re: FW Missions. Has that been confirmed, that missions can go to any system that originally had hostile Sov? If so .. Holy Screw Up Batman!
The change from Occupancy to Sovreignity was cosmetic, CCP did state this a number of times. |

Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor Federal Consensus Outreach
991
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:19:00 -
[152] - Quote
CCP need to add rewards for defensive plexing as well, to ensure people actually have a proper incentive to hold on to their systems once they've captured them. Mane 614
|

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
285
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 20:56:00 -
[153] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote:CCP need to add rewards for defensive plexing as well, to ensure people actually have a proper incentive to hold on to their systems once they've captured them.
Well, the incentive is supposed to be holding on to the system and whatever system upgrades and warzone control level that you have, but I agree that maybe earning like 25% of the LP back might make more people feel inclined to defensive plex. Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Mutnin
SQUIDS.
209
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 21:44:00 -
[154] - Quote
RavenPaine wrote:I joined FW to have "PvP available" but not really be commited full time. I have PvP'd for years and am just burnt out on it atm. I wanted to ISK up and just chill for a month or two. I did a ton of missions and did just that.
Along the way, I notice that many dedicated militia members kind of hate the mission runners.
Now: The mission LP have dropped in value, but ppl like me can plex for ISK, and the plexing helps the cause/whole militia. I put major dents in a lot of systems occupancy/contested levels. And I keep the enemy distracted along the way.
Yea I'm still not a fan of the no docking in stations but we are able to work around it. It is however nice to see that the mission farmers will now mostly be plex farmers and they are at least useful to the PVPers.
I do have to say that I did expect things to go stale on the system capture side of things but seems with all the guys out their farming LP's for plexing the system captures are going to keep happening, so maybe it will be a ok change after all.
The down side is there is zero engorgement to defend systems unless you live in them, or need them for FW missions. This means it's still pretty easy and likely more beneficial to hold less systems, because you have less to defend.
Maybe the no LP for defending will be the new way things stay balanced.. When one side gets more than they can defend the other side will take advantage and things may swing back & forth at that point. Still too early to see how this will change over say 6 months or so.
I guess for now seems to be a lot of fighting which is good, so maybe CCP should just leave things alone & fix the bugs then come back see where everything sits in 6 months time. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 22:08:00 -
[155] - Quote
Kade Jeekin wrote:Cearain wrote:
Bottom line is Raa was lost without a fight due to station lock outs. If we could still dock in lost systems we could have planted a bunch of plexing ships there. That way even if we lost the system that effort wouldn't be wasted because we could still use those ships to start offensive plexing and starting to take it back. However with the current mechanic if we moved ships there it would have had a large potential to be a wasted effort and lead to us having to move all that stuff back out again.
(Docking in mehator is not an option for the low sec status pilots and even if that weren't a problem that gate could be easilly camped.)
Raa has no stations for you to have been locked out of. Build a POS..
Building a pos is foolish for the same reason having stations flip is foolish.
If we could base some plexing ships in a next door system we could have put up a fight. But as it is, with station lock outs, there was no fight. Why move a bunch of ships just to have them lost when your pos/system will get taken by your enemies larger force?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
239
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:13:00 -
[156] - Quote
Mehatoor is high sec next door to Raa - and has a station. The reason Raa was lost was because more Minmatar farmed it than Amarr who thought it was worth defending.
You're going to see tons of systems with no stations flipping because they aren't worth defending. Time is better spent farming offensive plexes elsewhere, or defending important systems like Kamela and Sahtogas.
Really Cearain, sometimes it seems like you don't understand the fundamental concepts involved with playing the FW occupancy game. |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
1501
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 00:55:00 -
[157] - Quote
I will never understand why CCP went for the total non-docking approach.
Having militia stations flip offers enough advantages in terms of system upgrades and agent availability.
Having the non-militia stations flip doesn't make sense from an RP, logical or gameplay perspective.
My guess is it would have taken effort to code. You know... morons. |

Kuehnelt
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 01:48:00 -
[158] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:You're going to see tons of systems with no stations flipping because they aren't worth defending. Time is better spent farming offensive plexes elsewhere, or defending important systems like Kamela and Sahtogas.
No. Amarr are short the number of systems we'd need to get out of Tier 1 warzone control even if we upgraded all of them. We were already short before we lost Raa. Without Raa, we're even farther from using our LP as other than toilet paper. We haven't a single system that isn't worth defending. The reality of the Amarr/Minmatar front is that the Minmatar won. There's a lot to be said about the ridiculous and artificial nature of their victory, but anyway the Amarr militia is defeated, have the bearing of the defeated, speak as the defeated, behave like the defeated, and although this may not be obvious, although there are efforts to disguise it, it's discernible enough.
For instance, you'll find that your opinion is widely shared by numbers of the defeated: see, although Amarr haven't the number of systems needed to escape Tier 1 warzone control, apparently we still hold systems that "aren't worth defending"; after these systems are lost, retaking them still won't get us out of Tier 1 warzone control, and even if we did retake them they would just be "not worth defending" once again, so on both counts why bother? And many other systems aren't worth retaking: if Raa and Saidusairos are names that elicit a "whah? Where's that? Lol, Saidusairos is two jumps from me and I've never been there. No, I won't defend that totally worthless system.", then Sifilar and Halmah are yet more obscure. Auga will fade into legend. Frerstorn may as well be on the other side of the EVE Gate.
There's no marginal utility path to victory. Each system gained is not really a gain, but a farming opportunity lost, and a defensive burden added - not until the magic number of systems for the next level of warzone control is reached. Only then will every system finally be "worth defending". |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 02:50:00 -
[159] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Mehatoor is high sec next door to Raa - and has a station. The reason Raa was lost was because more Minmatar farmed it than Amarr who thought it was worth defending.
You're going to see tons of systems with no stations flipping because they aren't worth defending. Time is better spent farming offensive plexes elsewhere, or defending important systems like Kamela and Sahtogas.
Really Cearain, sometimes it seems like you don't understand the fundamental concepts involved with playing the FW occupancy game.
I addressed mehtor in my original post. I guess you mised it.
Systems without stations are worth just as much as systems with stations. Have you looked at how many jumps out from raa we would have had to go to have a low sec system we can dock in to defend raa?
Reasonable people can disagree on how important kamela and sahtogas are to defend. I happen to think we are using way to many resources there but whatever.
But I really don't think there is much in the way of strategy in this. Its mainly getting the numbers and winning regardless of what you choose to attack first. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
239
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 02:50:00 -
[160] - Quote
Kuehnelt wrote:X Gallentius wrote:You're going to see tons of systems with no stations flipping because they aren't worth defending. Time is better spent farming offensive plexes elsewhere, or defending important systems like Kamela and Sahtogas. No. Amarr are short the number of systems we'd need to get out of Tier 1 warzone control even if we upgraded all of them. We were already short before we lost Raa. Without Raa, we're even farther from using our LP as other than toilet paper. We haven't a single system that isn't worth defending. The reality of the Amarr/Minmatar front is that the Minmatar won. There's a lot to be said about the ridiculous and artificial nature of their victory, but anyway the Amarr militia is defeated, have the bearing of the defeated, speak as the defeated, behave like the defeated, and although this may not be obvious, although there are efforts to disguise it, it's discernible enough. I guess I'll take your word for it, but in the end last week I saw one person (Cynthia + her alt) occasionally in Raa whereas I saw 10 to 20 in Kamela and Sahtogas at all times. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 02:54:00 -
[161] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Kuehnelt wrote:X Gallentius wrote:You're going to see tons of systems with no stations flipping because they aren't worth defending. Time is better spent farming offensive plexes elsewhere, or defending important systems like Kamela and Sahtogas. No. Amarr are short the number of systems we'd need to get out of Tier 1 warzone control even if we upgraded all of them. We were already short before we lost Raa. Without Raa, we're even farther from using our LP as other than toilet paper. We haven't a single system that isn't worth defending. The reality of the Amarr/Minmatar front is that the Minmatar won. There's a lot to be said about the ridiculous and artificial nature of their victory, but anyway the Amarr militia is defeated, have the bearing of the defeated, speak as the defeated, behave like the defeated, and although this may not be obvious, although there are efforts to disguise it, it's discernible enough. I guess I'll take your word for it, but in the end last week I saw one person (Cynthia + her alt) occasionally in Raa whereas I saw 10 to 20 in Kamela and Sahtogas at all times.
Yeah allot of us are more interested in pvp rather than pve. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
239
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 03:17:00 -
[162] - Quote
Cearain wrote:[quote=X Gallentius]Yeah allot of us are more interested in pvp rather than pve. Let's see who has more kills, Cynthia or Cearain.....
Cearain
Cynthia
Yup. Seems like Cynthia - a player more interested in plexing (allegedly) - has more kills than a player more interested in fights (allegedly). In the past two weeks, anybody in my corp has been able to get 20 kills in one night.
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 03:52:00 -
[163] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:[quote=X Gallentius]Yeah allot of us are more interested in pvp rather than pve. Let's see who has more kills, Cynthia or Cearain..... CearainCynthiaYup. Seems like Cynthia - a player more interested in plexing (allegedly) - has more kills than a player more interested in fights (allegedly). In the past two weeks, anybody in my corp has been able to get 20 kills in one night.
Do you want me to explain all the reasons why someone might have more kills over a 2 week period than someone else? Or can you think this through yourself and realize this is not in any way proof that closing plexes is not the best way to find pvp in faction war? Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
171
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 04:15:00 -
[164] - Quote
RavenPaine wrote:I joined FW to have "PvP available" but not really be commited full time. I have PvP'd for years and am just burnt out on it atm. I wanted to ISK up and just chill for a month or two. I did a ton of missions and did just that.
Along the way, I notice that many dedicated militia members kind of hate the mission runners.
Now: The mission LP have dropped in value, but ppl like me can plex for ISK, and the plexing helps the cause/whole militia. I put major dents in a lot of systems occupancy/contested levels. And I keep the enemy distracted along the way. This guy gets it... Will the new FW be any good??? |

X Gallentius
Quantum Cats Syndicate
239
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 04:19:00 -
[165] - Quote
By all means let's hear them. Your kill totals / month are pretty subpar at best. It doesn't seem to me like you try very hard to get fights at all - whether in plexes or roaming pipes. In all seriousness, any one of the 100+ guys I've flown with over the past three weeks (in both Gallente and Minmatar FW space) easily get into more fights than you seem to find. |

Garr Earthbender
Quantum Cats Syndicate
43
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 04:20:00 -
[166] - Quote
Cearain wrote:X Gallentius wrote:Cearain wrote:[quote=X Gallentius]Yeah allot of us are more interested in pvp rather than pve. Let's see who has more kills, Cynthia or Cearain..... CearainCynthiaYup. Seems like Cynthia - a player more interested in plexing (allegedly) - has more kills than a player more interested in fights (allegedly). In the past two weeks, anybody in my corp has been able to get 20 kills in one night. Do you want me to explain all the reasons why someone might have more kills over a 2 week period than someone else? Or can you think this through yourself and realize this is not in any way proof that closing plexes is not the best way to find pvp in faction war?
So wait, do you just have a REALLY limited time to play Cearain? Cause I have less than 2 hours a night, and have only been back on since the 18th from a couple of months of RL stuff. Yet I have more kills than you this month as well? OK, so the carrier wasn't in a plex, but most of the war target kills were in systems with plexes active or on plex gates, or inside the plex themselves. Just sayin.
Garr Earthbender -Rock is overpowered, Scissors is fine. |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
171
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 04:23:00 -
[167] - Quote
The reason Raa was lost was it was isolated from the people defending the saht area and trying to push back down that part of the pipe and for whatever reason (since I wasn't in contact with them), the people closer such as kam didn't defend it. I don't know if there are legitimate reasons or not. Regardless of the fact, saying you don't want to pve for a week around Auga is a strawman argument. Either get yourself to the front line or hit their backyard. Just don't assume they will rush to defend it when occupancy is still well in their favour. When you get it closer to flipping, which shouldn't be that long if you are not contested in the plexes you will find the following 1) Lots of LP ready to go in the FW store when things are in your favour 2) The fights coming to you left right and centre as the blob moves to decontest those systems 3) The militia pilots fighting to save/push back around kam/saht will probably come for the mother of all battles vs the minnies.
Auga is perhaps the key to the fight at the moment - take it and some of those systems and the blob has to be in two places at once... Will the new FW be any good??? |

Mutnin
SQUIDS.
212
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 05:21:00 -
[168] - Quote
I wrote up a proposal on some basic fine tuning for the new sov system if anyone is interested in checking it out.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114840 |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 14:38:00 -
[169] - Quote
He is busy posting on here 
X Gallentius wrote:By all means let's hear them. Your kill totals / month are pretty subpar at best. It doesn't seem to me like you try very hard to get fights at all - whether in plexes or roaming pipes. In all seriousness, any one of the 100+ guys I've flown with over the past three weeks (in both Gallente and Minmatar FW space) easily get into more fights than you seem to find.
Is sexy time? |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 15:38:00 -
[170] - Quote
Garr Earthbender wrote:So wait, do you just have a REALLY limited time to play Cearain? Cause I have less than 2 hours a night, and have only been back on since the 18th from a couple of months of RL stuff. Yet I have more kills than you this month as well? OK, so the carrier wasn't in a plex, but most of the war target kills were in systems with plexes active or on plex gates, or inside the plex themselves. Just sayin. Garr Earthbender
I think spending 3-6 hours a week playing a computer game is pretty reasonable for someone in my situation. But bottom line after the kids go to bed I have about an hour or 2 before that I can either watch some tv with my wife or I can go play eve. I don't want to be going to play eve every night but 2 or 3 nights a week is pretty reasonable I think.
If I were single or had a different situation it would be a different story of course. But when you are hitting 14 hours a week thats not really a reasonable time expectation for me. Not to say I haven't played eve that often - I have and even longer - but for me I had to deal with the fact that it was getting to be too much. 14 hours a week is starting to creep up on what I would call a second job.
As for what I do to get the kills I do and why is my killboard not looking that great I think those are legitimate questions. I have 68 kills so far this month between my 2 pvp characters. I don't fly them together in pvp so there are no kills where they are both on the mail.
Cearain: http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=423582
Cearaen: http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_ext_id=687260122
I did catch some of the action in kourm but I missed the kamela slugfest. I was moving some ships that night and by the time I got down there in my cruiser they were looking for destroyers and I was about ready for bed.
As far as what I do to get pvp I am either trying to get fights via the plexing mechanic or I am teaming up with Almity from my corp.
As you can see Almity is currently listed as the top killer on the Amarr killboards for this month:
http://www.amarr-empire.net/killboard/?a=alliance_detail&all_ext_id=500003&view=pilot_kills
So even if I didn't know he was good at sniffing out fights from experience I would know it from his killboard.
Indeed he is not much of a plexer. And it is from my experiences when I am doing plexing and he is out roaming getting more kills that is leading me to conclude plexing is primarily a pve activity.
What do I do when I am not with others? I am either afk getting logistic stuff straightened out or I am solo doing plexing. Before I joined I law I would do almost exclusively use the faction war plexing mechanics to get fights. What do I do?
I name my ship "fw plexxer" so everyone in the system knows were they can find me if they want a fight. I then go into the systems that have the most wartargets or pirates I can find and open plexes. I don't always run the timer due to rat aggro. But after the inferno changes I have been.
Just last night it was getting to be about time for me to quit for the night. So I broke off from a fleet and stayed in huola (a system that has allot of minmatar) and ran a minor plex. Huola was contested and indeed it was one plex away from going from level 5 to level 4. I ran the plex without a single wt ever coming in to pay a visit. The system went to level 4. Did they know i was there? I don't know. That is why I advocate a notificiation system.
If you look at my killboard probably 80-90% of my solo kills were situations where I used plexes to get fights. So yes I do use plexes to get fights and I like to think I am actually pretty good at this. But what I do is very different than what I would do if I wanted to plex in order to obtain the consequences.
If I wanted to plex just to plex I would go to backwater systems and run them like mad. I would be looking for empty and dead systems not systems full of wartargets.
I have run plexes in and around egg. I don't get the pvp. I don't have allot of time to play eve so I don't want to waste it.
As far as the stupid amounts of time I spend posting yeah its bad. I post most of these things from my office. I figure I might as well keep at it since ccp is actually asking for feedback on eve. I don't plan on posting so much if they actually get faction war right.
Would my time be better spent in-game? No. This is pretty much a last ditch effort to help make eve something I can continue to play. If they continue to force everyone to commit the time necessary to play the null sec game I doubt I will continue to play.
I don't mean this as some sort of "herp derp I'm quitting eve post" But itGÇÖs just more of a realistic assessment of difference in the time I can put into a computer game and the time the developers want to insist I put in the game. I will keep playing if its feasible because the game is something of a childhood dream come true and I do love it. But if its going to be something that you canGÇÖt do without committing hours on end and I end up with several nights where I do nothing but roam around looking for a decent fight.
Well I feel by posting I am trying my best to explain to ccp, if they care to listen. I realize not many people in eve have such a limited time budget. But that is because the game mechanics basically exclude people with those sorts of budgets. And there is no reason it should - especially faction war. That is one reason why I think faction war could be something that could really grow eve in a big way. But I donGÇÖt think this approach of making it a stepping stone to null sec will accom... Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 15:59:00 -
[171] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:The reason Raa was lost was it was isolated from the people defending the saht area and trying to push back down that part of the pipe and for whatever reason (since I wasn't in contact with them), the people closer such as kam didn't defend it. I don't know if there are legitimate reasons or not. Regardless of the fact, saying you don't want to pve for a week around Auga is a strawman argument. Either get yourself to the front line or hit their backyard. Just don't assume they will rush to defend it when occupancy is still well in their favour. When you get it closer to flipping, which shouldn't be that long if you are not contested in the plexes you will find the following 1) Lots of LP ready to go in the FW store when things are in your favour 2) The fights coming to you left right and centre as the blob moves to decontest those systems 3) The militia pilots fighting to save/push back around kam/saht will probably come for the mother of all battles vs the minnies.
Auga is perhaps the key to the fight at the moment - take it and some of those systems and the blob has to be in two places at once...
I think we agree that given the station lockouts we couldn't plant ships near Raa, hence it was too isolated to put a fight over it. (other than the high sec system wich is problematic for people with low sec status.)
Before the whole station lock out business my corp was thinking in terms of having 3 or 4 different mini bases throughout faction war space for reships and plexing. We even discussed having one in caldari/gallente front. I actually had a few sub bases myself. That is why this station lock out idea is such crap.
BTW I think its funny that people on this forum think I have something against plexing in faction war. If you could see our corp forums there is likely only one other person in the corp who posts about plexing as much as I do.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Finrodd Felagund
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 16:03:00 -
[172] - Quote
I do hope that is not the 'official' website of the Amarr player faction? The forums look completely dead 
Btw, 3-6 hours per week playing EVE is *very* casual. Most people spend 2+ hours every day mindlessly watching TV, family or no. If you're smart, you have entirely dropped the bad habit of watching TV and spend all the gained time on EVE instead  |

Axl Borlara
T.R.I.A.D Defiant Legacy
31
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 16:22:00 -
[173] - Quote
Finrodd Felagund wrote: Btw, 3-6 hours per week playing EVE is *very* casual.
For what it's worth, it's about the same for me.
It's certainly possible to play that amount and still have fun and be involved with things.
It can also be really frustrating when the hour or so you've got to play ends up with nothing happening. Or joining just after the fleet disbands. But there's not much that can be done about that. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 17:07:00 -
[174] - Quote
Finrodd Felagund wrote:I do hope that is not the 'official' website of the Amarr player faction? The forums look completely dead  Btw, 3-6 hours per week playing EVE is *very* casual. Most people spend 2+ hours every day mindlessly watching TV, family or no. If you're smart, you have entirely dropped the bad habit of watching TV and spend all the gained time on EVE instead 
For the time I have I either watch tv/movie etc with wife or I play eve. Thats why I look at eve as a "better than tv alternative."
The Website is the most official killboard I know of. I didn't even really know it had a forum. I just use it as a killboard. I would note that I assume that Wolfsbrigade does not seem to use it. They would likely be at the top of the list. They are really the only major amarr corp I have heard of not using it. But like you say I am very casual so I might be wrong. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
441
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 17:12:00 -
[175] - Quote
Axl Borlara wrote:Finrodd Felagund wrote: Btw, 3-6 hours per week playing EVE is *very* casual.
For what it's worth, it's about the same for me. It's certainly possible to play that amount and still have fun and be involved with things. It can also be really frustrating when the hour or so you've got to play ends up with nothing happening. Or joining just after the fleet disbands. But there's not much that can be done about that.
I agree its frustrating. I think its hard for people who have more time to commit to a computer game to really know were we are coming from here.
I think ccp can do some things in faction war to make it so there are very few (if any) of those nights where nothing happens.
They could notify us when a plex is being captured so that we don't need to aimlessly roam around looking for where the attacks are happening.
Of course, they could also change the lockout rule so everyone can have the right plexing ships easilly accessible.  Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Garr Earthbender
Quantum Cats Syndicate
43
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 22:15:00 -
[176] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Stuff about game time.
Fair enough and well written. -Rock is overpowered, Scissors is fine. |

Kuehnelt
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 22:18:00 -
[177] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I would note that I assume that Wolfsbrigade does not seem to use it.
They can't. Neither can the Amarr 7th Fleet, or anyone else in an alliance. That KB is pretty far behind the times. |

Lock out
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
200
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 05:05:00 -
[178] - Quote
I assumed we all know by now that eve is far from what you can call "a game for casual players ?"
Also, you can't realistically expect to be rewarded for not playing. While other games reward you for playing with XP , Eve (on the pvp side at least) rewards you with quantity and/or quality of kills. If you are expecting to play 8 hrs/week and get the same results or benefits as the guy playing 8 hrs/day, then you are in for dissapointment.
Yes, FW was designed for casuals, it didn't work because, well ...casuals aren't active enough to provide a good environment, so CCP redesigned it. We like it or not, we have to deal with it, they are not gonna scrap all their investment in developement time/money. Hell, they are not even giving up on that crap inventory because they put development time in to it, allthough that's a far more obvious fiasco.
TL;DR We play the cards we are dealt . CCP dealt some cards, we can either play them or fold and leave the table. |

FIRST GENERAL
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
163
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 07:28:00 -
[179] - Quote
Cearain wrote:
The Website is the most official killboard I know of. I didn't even really know it had a forum. I just use it as a killboard. I would note that I assume that Wolfsbrigade does not seem to use it. They would likely be at the top of the list. They are really the only major amarr corp I have heard of not using it. But like you say I am very casual so I might be wrong.
Son, that amarr killboard is about as 'not up to date' and 'broken' as can be and we really can't be bothered to use it because of that simple fact. Iirc it also doesn't recognize alliances in Amarr FW.
You should look up things on eve-kill for a more accurate picture.
This month we went/are going past 2000 kills as a corp/alliance. There has never been this much action.
Oh and i'll rally myself on Lock Out's opinion. CCP dealt a hand - you either play it or you fold.
Some of us, rumor has it, are really good at poker  |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
443
|
Posted - 2012.05.30 13:14:00 -
[180] - Quote
FIRST GENERAL wrote:Cearain wrote:
The Website is the most official killboard I know of. I didn't even really know it had a forum. I just use it as a killboard. I would note that I assume that Wolfsbrigade does not seem to use it. They would likely be at the top of the list. They are really the only major amarr corp I have heard of not using it. But like you say I am very casual so I might be wrong.
Son, that amarr killboard is about as 'not up to date' and 'broken' as can be and we really can't be bothered to use it because of that simple fact. Iirc it also doesn't recognize alliances in Amarr FW. You should look up things on eve-kill for a more accurate picture. This month we went/are going past 2000 kills as a corp/alliance. There has never been this much action. Oh and i'll rally myself on Lock Out's opinion. CCP dealt a hand - you either play it or you fold. Some of us, rumor has it, are really good at poker 
I was here to play poker but now ccp tells me the game has changed we are playing go fish.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |