how about a good reason why this was pushed live when it was obviously unfinished?

how about a good reason why you won't either make it optional or at the least push it back to the test server for the y'know TESTING

Please let us choose which system we want to use, give us an option to roll back if we want to.

While you guys claim you are listening to feedback, when did you START listening? Because it is quite obvious that you didnt listen to feedback about it when people reported problems while this crap interface was still on Sisi.

Are you people this ******* stupid ROLL IT BACK THATS THE FIX.

and I WANT SOUNDWAVE FIRED

TONS of people looking for jobs LETS GET ONES WHO CAN DO THE JOB WELL.

Biggest issues for me:

- when in space I have my cargo window open to see how much cap boosters/ ammo is left, this window (even with tree minimized and such) takes now up more space which I dislike because I would like to see my ship and the ship it makes explode
-> please make the little volume bar and the isk ammount optional and consider making the frame of the whole thing thinner

- after successfull exploding an enemy ship I am using a loot tab in my overview to quickly open the wreck and cherrypick whatever was not fail of my opponents fitting, this is now broken as it opens the wreck view in my already open cargo window with tree minimzed and such, so that it is impossible to actualy loot anything if I dont want to use the "loot all" feature
-> if you do nothing else but this then please please please (did I mention please) have wrecks always open in a new separate window (in minimal mode without tree and whatnot) when accessed by any other means but the tree view

- shift clicking is a bad UI choice especially when in space and I have one hand at my mouse and one hand near the function keys to explode stuff and such... particularly in these situations I am apparently laging a third hand to do the shift thingy....to be fair though, I might use the third hand for something else even if I had it...

- I was nearly killed yesterday because I wanted to look into a wreck and my client locked up for about 5 secs, at the point when my client became responsive again I noticed a hostile ceptor burning towards me which I only escaped by luck (or fail of the ceptor pilot)
-> in space every second counts, any lag associated with opening a jetcan or wreck is totaly and utterly unacceptable, I suspect the lag is introduced because in addition to the content of the wreck the new inventory wants to show me all the other shiny wrecks possibly nearby ? Also it wants to calculate isk amount and show me the route to the nearest McDonalds ? If so..... stop that **** and make cargo/jetcan/wreck views totaly separate from the new system

- I dont see a way to distinguish between an actualy empty corp hanagar and one that I just dont have access to, since in both case "Nothing found" is stated....this is suboptimal at the least.... (and yes it is necessary to have non accessible corp hangars in your tree, because some people need to be able to drop stuff in such hangars even though they cant see what is in it and cant take stuff out again...)

First CSM member who trying to save the players' interests. Bud you a littlebit late. :P

Are you people this ******* stupid ROLL IT BACK THATS THE FIX.

and I WANT SOUNDWAVE FIRED

TONS of people looking for jobs LETS GET ONES WHO CAN DO THE JOB WELL.

Are you people this ******* stupid ROLL IT BACK THATS THE FIX.

and I WANT SOUNDWAVE FIRED

TONS of people looking for jobs LETS GET ONES WHO CAN DO THE JOB WELL.

Please let us choose which system we want to use, give us an option to roll back if we want to.

While you guys claim you are listening to feedback, when did you START listening? Because it is quite obvious that you didnt listen to feedback about it when people reported problems while this crap interface was still on Sisi.

First CSM member who trying to save the players' interests. Bud you a littlebit late. :P

It's posturing to make himself look good; he sits in a chatroom with devs, if a CSM needs to tell CCP something they don't do it on a forum thread, they actually talk to the devs.

I have made other posts, and posted in the CSM/CCP forums that this inventory system is trash, and have requested a rollback and also requested that they make the system OPTIONAL.




It is not posturing mate, and I dont give a rats ass about "looking good" for the community or anyone else.

As someone who plays eve over 3,000 hours a year, the inventory system is a slap in the face. CCP is showing that they are willing to put forth an unfinished update, that is near universally hated and has done this despite volumes of feedback from the community. I will not be renewing my subscriptions on non-essential alt accounts.

Like the last failed addition to Eve-Incarna, this patch adds lag, takes away functionality, and is despised by the people who actually use it. It is a real shame that they wont do the right thing: Roll it back and make it optional when reintroduced.

It is almost as if they put their image to outsiders before customer wants/needs. They seem to feel that the inventory changes are an "improvement" and more click and scrolling = more fun. If the changes are an improvement, then make them optional and let the players choose.

While CCP says they are listening to us, if they were listening before, this never would have went live. If they are listening to us, then they would roll it back. They say they are making fixes ASAP to some of it, they also say that they dont have fixes for some of the other bits, and I guess we will just have to suffer through it.

CCP: do us a favor-instead of claiming to listen to us and make fixes, ACTUALLY LISTEN TO US and roll back this turd till it is fixed then let us choose if we would like to use the new Inventory system.

This.

I want soundwave head aswell.. this is absurdly stupid.

I have made other posts, and posted in the CSM/CCP forums that this inventory system is trash, and have requested a rollback and also requested that they make the system OPTIONAL.




It is not posturing mate, and I dont give a rats ass about "looking good" for the community or anyone else.

As someone who plays eve over 3,000 hours a year, the inventory system is a slap in the face. CCP is showing that they are willing to put forth an unfinished update, that is near universally hated and has done this despite volumes of feedback from the community. I will not be renewing my subscriptions on non-essential alt accounts.

Like the last failed addition to Eve-Incarna, this patch adds lag, takes away functionality, and is despised by the people who actually use it. It is a real shame that they wont do the right thing: Roll it back and make it optional when reintroduced.

It is almost as if they put their image to outsiders before customer wants/needs. They seem to feel that the inventory changes are an "improvement" and more click and scrolling = more fun. If the changes are an improvement, then make them optional and let the players choose.

While CCP says they are listening to us, if they were listening before, this never would have went live. If they are listening to us, then they would roll it back. They say they are making fixes ASAP to some of it, they also say that they dont have fixes for some of the other bits, and I guess we will just have to suffer through it.

CCP: do us a favor-instead of claiming to listen to us and make fixes, ACTUALLY LISTEN TO US and roll back this turd till it is fixed then let us choose if we would like to use the new Inventory system.

Please let us choose which system we want to use, give us an option to roll back if we want to.

While you guys claim you are listening to feedback, when did you START listening? Because it is quite obvious that you didnt listen to feedback about it when people reported problems while this crap interface was still on Sisi.

One wonders why this was implemented as such in the first place. I can't imagine anyone in their right mind who would push this half done...(can't say it politely)...

Is there some internal CCP memorandum that you have to push out patches at a certain rate?
If so you need to toss that memo out with the TPS reports because you are destroying your customer base with these ill conceived up(down)grades. I would rather wait awhile for the programming to be thoroughly tested and worked over on the test server and then advertised heavily on how the new UI changes will work and how to replicate the previous functionality and that needs to be the starting point for any and all UI changes.

+1 vote

Please let us choose which system we want to use, give us an option to roll back if we want to.

While you guys claim you are listening to feedback, when did you START listening? Because it is quite obvious that you didnt listen to feedback about it when people reported problems while this crap interface was still on Sisi.