| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8446
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:26:00 -
[691] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:There must be some medical term for people who continue to talk to people who are, in no uncertain terms, not listening to them. It's not really a medical term, but the adjective you're looking for is GÇ£patientGÇ¥.
Anyway, it's nice to see that the OP has so changed his tune and are now looking out for the interest of others rather than himself. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:30:00 -
[692] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Tippia wrote:So you agree, then. That's awfully kind of you, especially after having been banging on about how they ruined your investment. One would have thought you meant compensation for yourself after all that, rather than for those who lost actual currency.  There must be some medical term for people who continue to talk to people who are, in no uncertain terms, not listening to them. Mr Epeen 
Why did you have to quote Tippia the Troll? Now I ended up reading his senseless posting. =(
Still seeking for Devs' response that was promised a week and half ago. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1593
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:41:00 -
[693] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:There must be some medical term for people who continue to talk to people who are, in no uncertain terms, not listening to them. It's not really a medical term, but the adjective you're looking for is GÇ£patientGÇ¥.
I would lean more towards arrogant, or more likely, narcissistic. Because you are not really trying to talk to him. You are just being sure that everyone reading knows you are right. Because you are always right. Right?
Mr Epeen 
There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8446
|
Posted - 2012.07.09 16:49:00 -
[694] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I would lean more towards arrogant, or more likely, narcissistic. Because you are not really trying to talk to him. Quite incorrect. He has already shown that he reads what I write so that excuse is rather spent. I'm really trying to make him answer the questions he apparently can't answer and engage him in a discussion to see if he has any kind of arguments to offer.
He's GÇ£not listeningGÇ¥ in much the same was as sticking your fingers in your ears and going GÇ£la-la-laGÇ¥ isn't listeningGǪ viz. not at all GÇö it's just a desperate attempt at avoiding the unavoidable.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 03:26:00 -
[695] - Quote
still waiting for CCP Devs' response. |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
797
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:20:00 -
[696] - Quote
Keep waiting. Why did you take my wings away? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:25:00 -
[697] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:Keep waiting.
All your postings do nothing, but to incite annoyance from the parties adversely affected by CCP's mistake.
I believe that falls in line with the very definition of being a troll and as such, I must "ignore" your postings as well.
Please do keep the bumps up though. I can't be on 24/7. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
345
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 04:57:00 -
[698] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:KrakizBad wrote:Keep waiting. All your postings do nothing, but to incite annoyance from the parties adversely affected by CCP's mistake. I believe that falls in line with the very definition of being a troll and as such, I must "ignore" your postings as well. Please do keep the bumps up though. I can't be on 24/7.
Quote:12. Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited. Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes GÇ£firstGÇ¥ and GÇ£go back to [another game]GÇ¥ posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1597
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 05:18:00 -
[699] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:12. Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited. Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes GÇ£firstGÇ¥ and GÇ£go back to [another game]GÇ¥ posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome.
Too bad you didn't find that rule before you were banned. People might have actually taken you seriously.
Or not.
Mr Epeen 
There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
349
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 05:33:00 -
[700] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:12. Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited. Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes GÇ£firstGÇ¥ and GÇ£go back to [another game]GÇ¥ posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome. Too bad you didn't find that rule before you were banned. People might have actually taken you seriously. Or not. Mr Epeen 
I for the most part posted off topic, substantial threads. Just because they were locked claiming "Spam" doesn't mean they fit that definition.
And CCP seems to have taken us seriously. So it seems to have worked. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 07:46:00 -
[701] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:12. Spamming, bumping and pyramid quoting are prohibited. Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or text or nonsensical posts that have no substance and are often designed to annoy other forum users. This includes GÇ£firstGÇ¥ and GÇ£go back to [another game]GÇ¥ posts. Bumping posts in order to keep them near the top of the list is also prohibited. Petitions or "/signed" posts are a version of bumping and likewise are not permitted. Pyramid quoting is a response to a forum thread that contains the quotes of four or more previous posters, sometimes with additional spaces added unnecessarily. Posts of this nature are not conducive to community spirit and are unwelcome. Too bad you didn't find that rule before you were banned. People might have actually taken you seriously. Or not. Mr Epeen  I for the most part posted off topic, substantial threads. Just because they were locked claiming "Spam" doesn't mean they fit that definition. They were against the rules, sure, but they weren't SpamAnd CCP seems to have taken us seriously. So it seems to have worked. Anyway, this is off topic (like most of the OP's recent posts). OP: What is the appropriate recompense for something given away for free?
CCP Devs already mentioned that they have devised a plan that would provide fair compensation for all the affected parties. It's just that CCP Devs were probably too busy with Alliance Tournaments to implement that plan.
I am just here, asking CCP to expedite on providing a response that was promised a week and half ago.
I suggest you wait for CCP's response and question the fairness of CCP's decision then. I've provided my opinion/answers and you guys provided your opinions more than hundreds of times. If you take the time to read everything, all our answers are given and we are just fighting over and over again because of our differences in value system.
Once again, I suggest that you wait for CCP's response before spamming another repetitious "stuff."
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8470
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 08:31:00 -
[702] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:CCP Devs already mentioned that they have devised a plan that would provide a fair compensation for all the affected parties. Again, no. You're reading an awful lot into a sentence that mentions none of those things.
They're trying to GÇ£formulate a plant that's as fair to as many as possibleGÇ¥. Compensation might be an outcome; it might also not. It might affect everyone; it might also not. Like I said, one fair deal would be to reimburse those who had to pay AUR for a free item. It could also be fair to just leave it as it is: you may have lost some value, but you got your stuff for free GÇö they had to pay for it, but now it's worth a bit more than when it was in the store. You feel very strongly that you should be compensated; we're asking you why and for what, and you have problems formulating an answer. This does not bode well.
Quote:It's just that CCP Devs were probably too busy with Alliance Tournaments to implement that plan. Nah. They're probably too busy with vacation. The ATs aren't really something that ties up dev resources (aside from appearing in the studio segments, but that won't start until next week).
Quote:I've provided my opinion/answers and you guys have provided the same for the past two weeks in this 27 page thread. Not really, no. You've provided some opinion but very little in the way of answers or arguments to back it up GÇö you've mostly offered deflections, red herrings, the odd straw man and ad hominem, and a fair bit of spam and trolling. You've continuously misread (or skipped) what others have written and just refused to stay on topic.
You're so locked into a an outcome that you feel must happen that you are apparently unable to discuss what might and what should happen, and the reasons for it. Dogmatism isn't particularly persuasiveGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians The Aurora Shadow
61
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 08:36:00 -
[703] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote: I am just here, asking CCP to expedite on providing a response that was promised a week and half ago. Having been promised a response, I think we are entitled to be more vigilant in asking CCP since they do tend to forget these matters.
Given the response time for most petitions, waiting a week and a half for a response is about par, you should be more patient. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 08:42:00 -
[704] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:The Antiquarian wrote: I am just here, asking CCP to expedite on providing a response that was promised a week and half ago. Having been promised a response, I think we are entitled to be more vigilant in asking CCP since they do tend to forget these matters.
Given the response time for most petitions, waiting a week and a half for a response is about par, you should be more patient.
You are right, but I am just afraid that CCP Devs, overran by work and Alliance Tournaments, will forget to do anything about it. That's why I am asking for responses. This is CCP Navigator's forum response that we got on June 28th, which was approximately a week and half ago:
"I will aim to provide an update tomorrow on exactly what we plan to do. That plan is almost final, however, I do not want to state something which may change in the next 24 hours."
They made it sound as if the plan was finalized pending a review, but obviously that isn't the case. |
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1320

|
Posted - 2012.07.10 13:53:00 -
[705] - Quote
Ok, so here is the much delayed update. I am sorry that this has taken so long but we needed to run through a seriously complicated process to track down each unique shirt issued before June 25.
So here are the steps that will happen over the next few days to finalize this issue:
1, We will issue the following people a 'Mens Field Marshall Coat':
* Those players who took the PLEX offer in October and kept their shirt based on its exclusivity. * Players who bought the shirt from an original owner on the basis that it would be an exclusive item. Again, if the owner sold it on then the person who ultimately ended up with the shirt based on owning an exclusive item.
if you received the shirt and sold it or traded for a profit you will not receive this new item.
2, We are updating the item description for this jacket and this will be deployed in the next day or two. Once that deployment takes place we will redeem the item to all relevant account holders. Once this happens i will update the thread letting you know that the item is ready to be redeemed.
There are some edge cases involved with this of players who may have their shirt stored in secure containers or containers in space. These players will need to submit a petition to verify ownership.
It is difficult to give the perfect resolution in cases of this nature and we feel that this resolution benefits the greater number.
Thank you for your patience during this time. CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|

Mashie Saldana
Veto. Veto Corp
548
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:43:00 -
[706] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Ok, so here is the much delayed update. I am sorry that this has taken so long but we needed to run through a seriously complicated process to track down each unique shirt issued before June 25. So here are the steps that will happen over the next few days to finalize this issue: 1, We will issue the following people a 'Mens Field Marshall Coat': * Those players who took the PLEX offer in October and kept their shirt based on its exclusivity. * Players who bought the shirt from an original owner on the basis that it would be an exclusive item. Again, if the owner sold it on then the person who ultimately ended up with the shirt based on owning an exclusive item. if you received the shirt and sold it or traded for a profit you will not receive this new item. 2, We are updating the item description for this jacket and this will be deployed in the next day or two. Once that deployment takes place we will redeem the item to all relevant account holders. Once this happens i will update the thread letting you know that the item is ready to be redeemed. There are some edge cases involved with this of players who may have their shirt stored in secure containers or containers in space. These players will need to s ubmit a petition to verify ownership. It is difficult to give the perfect resolution in cases of this nature and we feel that this resolution benefits the greater number. Thank you for your patience during this time. What about the Red/Gold female Executor coat that you also messed around with? Dominique Vasilkovsky Mashie Saldana Monica Foulkes |

Rikula
Opur
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:49:00 -
[707] - Quote
Thanks for the reply. Couple of questions
CCP Navigator wrote: 1, We will issue the following people a 'Mens Field Marshall Coat':
...
2, We are updating the item description for this jacket and this will be deployed in the next day or two.
Is this to be a 'Men's Field Marshall Coat' that is distinguished from the one currently available? I'm guessing the answer is yes, since you are saying that the item description will be changed. Will it be one of the green or silver version? Or just the current one with new description?
CCP Navigator wrote:There are some edge cases involved with this of players who may have their shirt stored in secure containers or containers in space. These players will need to s ubmit a petition to verify ownership.
I am one that has the shirts in a container. I also had some sold to me from existing buy orders once the 100 Aurum version went live. Should I move the shirts from the container it is in, in anticipation of this redemption?
Or will I risk having it mixed up/confused with the ones I purchased post-patch, and thus be denied a redeemable version? I still have them all, so it is easy to tell (based on transactions post-patch) how many I had prior to patch.
Thanks! |

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
98
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:56:00 -
[708] - Quote
Space barbie drama. ''I got a coat an now everyone ahs my coat cry, cry cry cry.'' The same people moaning about these coats are the same people who want to have other items all to themselves. Other items such as T2BPO that let them stomp all over noobs with zero effort from their part, At least this crappy coat does not give them huge advantages. CCP should seed t2BPO's on the market for 50 cents too and make them cry some more :) Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 14:58:00 -
[709] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Ok, so here is the much delayed update. I am sorry that this has taken so long but we needed to run through a seriously complicated process to track down each unique shirt issued before June 25. So here are the steps that will happen over the next few days to finalize this issue: 1, We will issue the following people a 'Mens Field Marshall Coat': * Those players who took the PLEX offer in October and kept their shirt based on its exclusivity. * Players who bought the shirt from an original owner on the basis that it would be an exclusive item. Again, if the owner sold it on then the person who ultimately ended up with the shirt based on owning an exclusive item. if you received the shirt and sold it or traded for a profit you will not receive this new item. 2, We are updating the item description for this jacket and this will be deployed in the next day or two. Once that deployment takes place we will redeem the item to all relevant account holders. Once this happens i will update the thread letting you know that the item is ready to be redeemed. There are some edge cases involved with this of players who may have their shirt stored in secure containers or containers in space. These players will need to s ubmit a petition to verify ownership. It is difficult to give the perfect resolution in cases of this nature and we feel that this resolution benefits the greater number. Thank you for your patience during this time.
Thank you for your response, but I believe this brings more questions than answers. You specified that we will be receiving "Mens Field Marshall Coat." That already exist in the NeX Store with an equivalent price tag of 800M or so. Ishukone Shirt's market value prior to the devaluation was 2B. Arn't we still shorthanded? You claimed before that a solution is in place that would provide a fair compensation for the affected parties. If what we are receiving, are the same Mens Field Marshall Coat that is purchasable for 800M, then I am not sure if there's fairness in this.
Or as Rikula asked, are the "Mens Field Marshall Coat" going to be a different version of the pre-existing ones? The current one is yellow. Are we going to be receiving something that is unique? You did mention that "description" will change, so can we hope that we will be receiving a unique Shirt that is completely different from the preexisting one?
Also, is there a safe control in place so that this does not happen again?
Hope to hear from you soon! |

Rikula
Opur
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:09:00 -
[710] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote: * Players who bought the shirt from an original owner on the basis that it would be an exclusive item. Again, if the owner sold it on then the person who ultimately ended up with the shirt based on owning an exclusive item.
Actually, I would like to add another question, because you have curious wording for this part. I put up buy orders before the patch, on the basis that I would be purchasing the exclusive item. Due to circumstances (time it took to patch, not being able to get to computer immediately), I did not notice the 100 Aurum Ishukone shirt until after my buy orders had been filled. It may have even been before I logged on, but I do not remember.
Given the wording you have chosen, does this mean people like myself who had pre-existing buy orders that were filled rapidly post-patch, on the basis that the shirt was exclusive, qualify on account of those purchases too?
Or just those that had transactions finalised prior to the patch? |

Rikula
Opur
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:10:00 -
[711] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:You specified that we will be receiving "Mens Field Marshall Coat." That already exist in the NeX Store with an equivalent price tag of 800M or so.
I can't log in at the moment, but iirc the marshall coat is actually selling for around 550mil, with buy orders around 370mil. |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
352
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:24:00 -
[712] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Space barbie drama. ''I got a coat an now everyone ahs my coat cry, cry cry cry.'' The same people moaning about these coats are the same people who want to have other items all to themselves. Other items such as T2BPO that let them stomp all over noobs with zero effort from their part, At least this crappy coat does not give them huge advantages. CCP should seed t2BPO's on the market for 50 cents too and make them cry some more :)
Not everything is about your irrational hatred of Pie, Brewlar. -RubyPorto
IB4TS |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8481
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:34:00 -
[713] - Quote
The Antiquarian wrote:Thank you for your response, but I believe this brings more questions than answers. You specified that we will be receiving "Mens Field Marshall Coat." That already exist in the NeX Store with an equivalent price tag of 400M or so. Ishukone Shirt's market value prior to the devaluation was 2B. Arn't we still shorthanded? You've now not only received a shirt for free, but also a free coat. You have an interesting definition of GÇ£shorthandedGÇ£ (you probably mean short-changed, but nvm.)
Quote:You claimed before that a solution is in place that would provide a fair compensation for the affected parties. No. They claimed that they were GÇ£formulat[ing] a plant that's as fair to as many as possibleGÇ¥. No compensation was mentioned and if one was to come, nothing was said about it being fair to you. They were looking for something that was as fair as possible to as many as possible GÇö giving you stuff for free isn't fair to the people who had to pay for the same stuff. Instead, you've been given more free stuff that hopefully will cover some of your non-realised profit while at the same time not further devaluing stuff that's already in the game. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
513
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:45:00 -
[714] - Quote
Tippia View post Show posts
Are the Field Marshalls' Coat that you mentioned, same as the pre-existing ones? What do you mean when you say "description will be changed?" So we are getting new unique coats? |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1598
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 15:49:00 -
[715] - Quote
First, thank you for the response CCP.
Though the Antiquarian is right in that it does raise more questions. Mostly due to a lack of detail in the post and the ambiguity of the wording. But as this has already been touched on I would like to add a question of my own.
Will the Jacket that was purchasable in the NeX store remain off the market or return as an AUR item?
I ask this because right now it is an exclusive item as well and may be of some interest to those who are willing to take the risk of speculating on it. If it is returned to the Noble Exchange it just becomes another piece of clothing.
Mr Epeen 
There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8483
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 16:00:00 -
[716] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Will the Jacket that was purchasable in the NeX store remain off the market or return as an AUR item?
I ask this because right now it is an exclusive item as well and may be of some interest to those who are willing to take the risk of speculating on it. If it is returned to the Noble Exchange it just becomes another piece of clothing. Come to think of it, that would actually an interesting way of doing itGǪ
Let the shirt out on the market again at whatever price it was, and replace it with a (relabelled) coat from one of the ones that haven't been seeded yet, and make that as GÇ£special issueGÇ¥ as the shirt was.
It's not like there's a dearth of unreleased items for them to choose from. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Celeste Taylor
Ruby Dynasty
49
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 22:23:00 -
[717] - Quote
Mashie Saldana wrote:What about the Red/Gold female Executor coat that you also messed around with?
The prices of the R/G has been rising and is currently about 100m buy 200m sell. It will probably balance out a little under what it was before the update and slowly climb after that if no more are introduced. I don't think it is a big deal and wrote off my loses. |

iskflakes
Magnets Inc. Imperial Auxiliares Regiment
23
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 22:52:00 -
[718] - Quote
I am pleased to see a new response to this issue, however the following points still need to be addressed:
1) What about the Women's red/gold coat?
2) Will the ishukone shirt be placed back on the NEX store, or will it remain rare from now on? (please announce this in advance so nobody gets burned when you release the patch).
3) Will the women's red/gold coat be placed back on the NEX store?
4) Is the new Men's coat going to be a unique item, or will it also be available on the NEX store? Is it the same coat that is already available?
5) If the isukone shirt is to remain rare, can we see some statistics on how many of these shirts exist, and how many were purchased in the few days after it's release? You probably came up with these statistics already during your investigations.
6) There is a group of players who will not be compensated by this change: Those who had buy orders up the day before the isukone release. Those players, such as myself, woke up to find our wallets a few billion lighter, and our hangars filled with worthless shirts. As these players did not own the shirt during downtime when the change was released, they will not be compensated by the scheme you have announced, yet they still lost billions due to your mistake. I believe the best course of action to help these players is to allow the ishukone shirt to remain rare. This way it will recover some of its original value, and traders such as myself will eventually be able to recover some of our losses.
Please announce all these changes in advance several days before the patch, to allow us to look for mistakes you may have made. If a list of new NEX items had been made available on SiSi or in a dev blog, we would have spotted the ishukone shirt and alerted you before any damage was done. Damage was cuased because the changes were not announced, please do not repeat this mistake. |

Celeste Taylor
Ruby Dynasty
49
|
Posted - 2012.07.10 23:18:00 -
[719] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:
6) There is a group of players who will not be compensated by this change: Those who had buy orders up the day before the isukone release. Those players, such as myself, woke up to find our wallets a few billion lighter, and our hangars filled with worthless shirts. As these players did not own the shirt during downtime when the change was released, they will not be compensated by the scheme you have announced, yet they still lost billions due to your mistake. I believe the best course of action to help these players is to allow the ishukone shirt to remain rare. This way it will recover some of its original value, and traders such as myself will eventually be able to recover some of our losses.
Either that or you did well if those orders were filled with the classic shirt. I tried to dump as much of my inventory that I could when I saw that the items were on the NEX shop and filled other peoples buy orders. Buying stuff to fill the orders was not an option since I never have owned any AUR, and I was more concerned about being stuck holding a bunch of devalued merchandise (minimize losses) rather than making a profit. Was a bit slow on the trigger though, but wouldn't be surprised if the people who dumped their merchandise to the buy orders first had the classic shirt. I think the Mysterio Boots, Greave Knee Boots and maybe the original Excursion Pants were briefly repriced at 100AUR, and I managed to fill a number of other people buy orders with my stock. |

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
514
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 04:56:00 -
[720] - Quote
We are sorry for having to ask you several dozens more of questions, but CCP Navigator, what kind of control system do you have in place, to prevent this kind of mistake from reoccurring?
Also what is the future course of the EVE Online's future marketing promotion? Are you going to be reusing any other historical items? Or do we have to live in a constant fear that after having to partake in the promotion to obtain those items, those items will be devalued by future circulation? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |