| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 27 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 89 post(s) |

Rats
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
265
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:33:00 -
[721] - Quote
Anslo wrote:III ZiggyBang wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:
Any news on the ISDs new self appointed ability to create rules?
Here is the only rule you really need to be concerned about.: When you run the EVE Community team you can make all the rules you like and enforce them as you see fit. Until that time we would invite you to follow the current forum rules and show some respect to those staff and volunteers who aim to make it a better place for everyone else. If that is something you feel is not within your power then we may have a problem. we have a problem all right, if you think the community is well served by the volunteers & your attitude you're out of your volcan mind. Can you blame him with all the crap the community gives him? There's a difference between tyrannical devs and devs reacting to an assholish community. Rules are simple in respect to what Navigator said. You respect employees AND volunteers. No exceptions. Their forums. Their rules. Can't deal with it? GTFO.
CCP Alt ?
-áI Fought the Law, and the Law Won... -áTalon Silverhawk-á |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
397
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:33:00 -
[722] - Quote
III ZiggyBang wrote:will you please just shutup, you are the worst shitposter I've seen in ages.
When you stop bitching about company employee's acting well within their realm and rights, I might consider it. Otherwise, go biomass. |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2655
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:35:00 -
[723] - Quote
III ZiggyBang wrote:will you please just shutup, you are the worst shitposter I've seen in ages.
Apparently you haven't been here long. I've seen worse "A genius throws a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that he's going to die choking in a maze of smoke and flame. A hero drinks a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that if he does a split in midair, he can hit twice as many zombies per kick. Drunk hero wins again, wusses." ~Cracked.com |

Reticle
Sight Picture
46
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:41:00 -
[724] - Quote
DarkSim Market wrote:These forums seriously need quadruple the amount of moderation and PERMANENT bans. You know its bad when a cesspit like kugu has higher quality discussion then the official forum. Quadruple? lol. You're an idiot.
I've got a "better" proposal. CCP needs to put out decent documentation on their game so people don't have to visit the goddamn forums for every little question. Since that will kill the majority of posts, that leaves us with intractable arguments (carebears are evil vs. pvp'ers are evil) and arguments about how things "should be," which are actually encouraged by CCP in their Features and Ideas type threads. Kill all the intractable argument threads and that will leave us with only the threads in which CCP solicits our feedback. Which they could also do by way surveys through the client/UI/game.
So, who needs the ******* forums? "Problem" solved.
If you're going to give people a place to talk about stuff, the moderators need to stay out of the way. They should be concerned only with the most egregious violations with stuff like hate speech and go back to blowing ships up rather than pretending they work for CCP. |

Reticle
Sight Picture
46
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:42:00 -
[725] - Quote
Anslo wrote:III ZiggyBang wrote:will you please just shutup, you are the worst shitposter I've seen in ages. When you stop bitching about company employee's acting well within their realm and rights, I might consider it. Otherwise, go biomass. EDIT: If you don't like me, block me. Feature is there for a reason. Why don't you apply that logic to the posters you think should be moderated?
Cause you're stupid. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
398
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 20:44:00 -
[726] - Quote
Reticle wrote:Anslo wrote:III ZiggyBang wrote:will you please just shutup, you are the worst shitposter I've seen in ages. When you stop bitching about company employee's acting well within their realm and rights, I might consider it. Otherwise, go biomass. EDIT: If you don't like me, block me. Feature is there for a reason. Why don't you apply that logic to the posters you think should be moderated? Cause you're stupid.
Because I hate you :) |

III ZiggyBang
One Point 0
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.09 22:30:00 -
[727] - Quote
I think it's necessary to sticky another post with information on how to petition/email complaints. even if we can no longer discuss moderation anywhere people should have the information available to make formal complaints. |

None ofthe Above
340
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 02:24:00 -
[728] - Quote
CCP Gargant wrote:None ofthe Above wrote:CCP Gargant wrote:This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.
The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later. Oh that is disappointing. The one place on the forums where moderation could be discussed has fulfilled it's purpose? You no longer feel that should be allowed? Please reconsider. Almost the first thing I did when I came into the forums was to acknowledge that there needs to be a place to discuss moderation in the general sense rather than specific instances of it. I am very much ready to discuss my own opinions regarding ways of moderation. This thread served that purpose, true, but it currently does more bad than good due to events that negatively affected it over the summer that I myself had nothing to do with because I wasn't a part of the Community Team yet. Removing the sticky on this thread is not an attempt to bury it or hide it. I can lock and delete for that. I'm trying to convey the point that we know things aren't in their best possible state yet and we are actively working towards getting them there. The seminar will be held this week as I said, and we will continue on from there. I'm not promising anything because I want to be able to deliver, but I can say that I have a specific goal and I am working towards that.
Thank you. Being able to discuss the moderation policies keeps things from getting out of hand. Even if things do get a little heated sometimes, its been a useful thread. I can understand the desire to not carry all the baggage.
Not sure if the "place" needs to be a pinned thread in eve general, but it suffices. Sub-forum somewhere might work too.
EVE is a sandbox; The only "end-game" content in EVE is the crap that makes you rage-quit.
|

Lord Ryan
True Xero
701
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 02:47:00 -
[729] - Quote
Quote:The future of Community and CCL
Hopefully a short one. Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Rats
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
266
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 07:57:00 -
[730] - Quote
CCP Gargant wrote:None ofthe Above wrote:CCP Gargant wrote:This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.
The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later. Oh that is disappointing. The one place on the forums where moderation could be discussed has fulfilled it's purpose? You no longer feel that should be allowed? Please reconsider. Almost the first thing I did when I came into the forums was to acknowledge that there needs to be a place to discuss moderation in the general sense rather than specific instances of it. I am very much ready to discuss my own opinions regarding ways of moderation. This thread served that purpose, true, but it currently does more bad than good due to events that negatively affected it over the summer that I myself had nothing to do with because I wasn't a part of the Community Team yet. Removing the sticky on this thread is not an attempt to bury it or hide it. I can lock and delete for that. I'm trying to convey the point that we know things aren't in their best possible state yet and we are actively working towards getting them there. The seminar will be held this week as I said, and we will continue on from there. I'm not promising anything because I want to be able to deliver, but I can say that I have a specific goal and I am working towards that.
So why un sticky, this was put here for that reason in the first place. To un sticky this then say your going to create another thread to do the same thing sounds like someone acting first then thinking afterwards....
You should have just left it alone rather than again damaging relations...
Tal
-áI Fought the Law, and the Law Won... -áTalon Silverhawk-á |

Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
399
|
Posted - 2012.10.10 10:09:00 -
[731] - Quote
Lord Ryan wrote:Quote:The future of Community and CCL Hopefully a short one. Thirty odd pages and finally the whole situation summed up in a few words.
Kudos to you. WARNING: The current poster is erratic, prone to error and generally blissfully unaware due to the taking of many hard drugs over the course of many years - most of them legal. |

Caliph Muhammed
Short Bus Friends
297
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 04:29:00 -
[732] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:OlRotGut wrote:Make posting cost ISK.
Make user rating increase or decrease said ISK fee to post
Allow the author of the thread to delete 'trolling' posts for a cost of ISK.
You suck at posting, your user rating suffers, your posts now cost xx more ISK
Just a thought and I know it could be expanded upon.
Unfortunately, this would be way too open to abuse. Hence why moderation should never be done by the OP (especially as we have OPs that troll too).
This is bunk because the abuse is confined to the OPs 1 thread where as censorship institutionalized is system wide. If I hate carebears and have mod power I can very subtlety censor threads from those who harbor that opinion.
It sounds like an injection of precondition from someone with a fringe opinion looking to justify their existence in everyone's thread.
It's also insulting to the majority of good people who post. Telling me i'm incapable of fairly handling moderation of my own thread but ISD magically becomes a neutral force of good. I'll end here as to not go too far. |

Pipa Porto
1191
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 10:45:00 -
[733] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:I think the real fear is that a few very eloquent posters who really capture the spirit of the community would have the ability to interject ideas that the majority likes and the vocal minority wouldn't be able to troll the thread into derailment skirting the rules of conduct.
No, the problem is that your idea would turn each thread into it's own fishbowl for the OP and whatever flunkies/sockpuppets they might have.
Your claim that other threads would check this behavior is ridiculous, as all the badposter OP would have to do would be claim the counter threads are just the result of that OP censoring their thread.
At best, it risks splitting every thread with a hint of contention into two threads yelling at each other. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Taranius De Consolville
Curse Of The Chosen
239
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 10:48:00 -
[734] - Quote
Your team is an effin joke
They are biased, un educated morons who lock topics they don't want to read about and keep open troll topics by moronic alliance people who cant string an educated idea together
Get a real forum officer
Not the idiots with no lives you currently have |

Alice Saki
10361
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 10:52:00 -
[735] - Quote
Taranius De Consolville wrote:Your team is an effin joke
They are biased, un educated morons who lock topics they don't want to read about and keep open troll topics by moronic alliance people who cant string an educated idea together
Get a real forum officer
Not the idiots with no lives you currently have
You make me laugh. Scottish Interweb Spaceshippy Person, Very Easily Confused. I like to show my Love by Smashing people in the face with a big Hammer.
|

Taranius De Consolville
Curse Of The Chosen
239
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 10:56:00 -
[736] - Quote
Alice Saki wrote:Taranius De Consolville wrote:Your team is an effin joke
They are biased, un educated morons who lock topics they don't want to read about and keep open troll topics by moronic alliance people who cant string an educated idea together
Get a real forum officer
Not the idiots with no lives you currently have You make me laugh.
Post with your main u little coward and ill see how much you laugh then, easy to hide behind alts isnt it? |

Alice Saki
10366
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 11:16:00 -
[737] - Quote
Prrrf I've never hid my main, This one is just better :P Scottish Interweb Spaceshippy Person, Very Easily Confused. I like to show my Love by Smashing people in the face with a big Hammer.
|

Lord Ryan
True Xero
716
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:29:00 -
[738] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:
Any news on the ISDs new self appointed ability to create rules?
Here is the only rule you really need to be concerned about.: When you run the EVE Community team you can make all the rules you like and enforce them as you see fit. Until that time we would invite you to follow the current forum rules and show some respect to those staff and volunteers who aim to make it a better place for everyone else. If that is something you feel is not within your power then we may have a problem.
There needs to be some oversight here. This guy is clearly hostile toward the player base. We have no recourse. File petition, he'll just delete it. Someone at CCP who's not involved with the Eve community team needs to review the petitions. Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
415
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:41:00 -
[739] - Quote
Lord Ryan wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:
Any news on the ISDs new self appointed ability to create rules?
Here is the only rule you really need to be concerned about.: When you run the EVE Community team you can make all the rules you like and enforce them as you see fit. Until that time we would invite you to follow the current forum rules and show some respect to those staff and volunteers who aim to make it a better place for everyone else. If that is something you feel is not within your power then we may have a problem. There needs to be some oversight here. This guy is clearly hostile toward the player base. We have no recourse. File petition, he'll just delete it. Someone at CCP who's not involved with the Eve community team needs to review the petitions.
Hostility begets hostility. People can frame certain questions certain ways. Pipa framed hers in a hostile manner, plain and simple. People are assholes in this thread, so assholery will be given back to them. Act civily, and you get civility.
They TRIED to be professional and you bittervet assholes just tear them up. They should have just outright ban people instead of giving them warning. Nothing would be lost anyway. |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
716
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:56:00 -
[740] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Lord Ryan wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:
Any news on the ISDs new self appointed ability to create rules?
Here is the only rule you really need to be concerned about.: When you run the EVE Community team you can make all the rules you like and enforce them as you see fit. Until that time we would invite you to follow the current forum rules and show some respect to those staff and volunteers who aim to make it a better place for everyone else. If that is something you feel is not within your power then we may have a problem. There needs to be some oversight here. This guy is clearly hostile toward the player base. We have no recourse. File petition, he'll just delete it. Someone at CCP who's not involved with the Eve community team needs to review the petitions. Hostility begets hostility. People can frame certain questions certain ways. Pipa framed hers in a hostile manner, plain and simple. People are assholes in this thread, so assholery will be given back to them. Act civily, and you get civility. They TRIED to be professional and you bittervet assholes just tear them up. They should have just outright ban people instead of giving them warning. Nothing would be lost anyway.
You should be the first. Any part of my post vulgar? I try to contribute and enjoy the community I pay to be member. It goes good untill some ISD logs in and starts griefing a player. Nine times out of ten it's ISD's action towards one of you that sets me off. The other could have been found in the T2 BPO thread. Do you think the number of people who are tired of this whole business is small? How many of can Eve afford to lose?
And I'm no more of a Pipa fan than I am yours. I just can't believe the guy in charge, is the it's my house my rules I can change them any time I want screw you if you don't like guy! Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
416
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:58:00 -
[741] - Quote
That's the business world. ISD don't grief btw, they enforce. Unruly mobs beget unruly policing. |

Josef Djugashvilis
679
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 20:54:00 -
[742] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:I think the real fear is that a few very eloquent posters who really capture the spirit of the community would have the ability to interject ideas that the majority likes and the vocal minority wouldn't be able to troll the thread into derailment skirting the rules of conduct. No, the problem is that your idea would turn each thread into it's own fishbowl for the OP and whatever flunkies/sockpuppets they might have. Your claim that other threads would check this behavior is ridiculous, as all the badposter OP would have to do would be claim the counter threads are just the result of that OP censoring their thread. At best, it risks splitting every thread with a hint of contention into two threads yelling at each other.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is a 'sockpuppet'? This is not a signature. |

Pipa Porto
1192
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 01:42:00 -
[743] - Quote
Anslo wrote: Hostility begets hostility. People can frame certain questions certain ways. Pipa framed hers in a hostile manner, plain and simple. People are assholes in this thread, so assholery will be given back to them. Act civily, and you get civility.
They TRIED to be professional and you bittervet assholes just tear them up. They should have just outright ban people instead of giving them warning. Nothing would be lost anyway.
I did phrase my question civilly. Back on page 32.
After a week and a half of dodging the initial question and focusing instead on trying to convince everyone that ISDs aren't making new rules when they prohibit something not prohibited by the rules, and an attempt to bury the thread, I got a little snippy.
Instead of answering the initial question, CCP Navigator decided to latch onto this and keep running the topic off the rails.
By the way, 2 weeks later, nobody's answered the initial question over whether Killmails can be posted in GD or whether (as ISD Suvetar claims) the rules of other subforums apply to posting in GD. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
1192
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 01:44:00 -
[744] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Forgive my ignorance, but what is a 'sockpuppet'?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
Essentially an alt used to make it appear as if there are multiple sources of independent support for something. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Mara Rinn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1920
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 01:52:00 -
[745] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Forgive my ignorance, but what is a 'sockpuppet'?
Sock puppet: specifically in EVE terms, a forum posting alt used to provide the illusion that a forum poster has friends, supporters, or respect. Sock puppets are also useful for asking "Dorothy Dix" questions, or for making foolish statements which the controlling player can then refute in an attempt to improve their forum k/d ratio.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Mara Rinn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1920
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 01:58:00 -
[746] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:I think the real fear is that a few very eloquent posters who really capture the spirit of the community would have the ability to interject ideas that the majority likes and the vocal minority wouldn't be able to troll the thread into derailment skirting the rules of conduct.
The fear is that there are so few eloquent posters who really capture the spirit of the community, and so many trolls.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
294

|
Posted - 2012.10.13 02:17:00 -
[747] - Quote
Hi,
Just to give you an update on the Killmail thing.
As of right now, the position we're sticking to is that posting killmails leads to trolling, and will be dealt with as an application of forum rule 7.
forum rules wrote: 7. Trolling is prohibited. Trolling is the word used to describe a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players. Posts of this nature are disruptive and do not contribute to the sense of community we want for our forums.
You may be pleased to know however, that we've been discussing this internally, a lot. I don't know what the final decision is going to be, but I just wanted to assure you that we're not brushing this under the carpet.
Don't forget that there is a ISD seminar for the CCL team tomorrow and people will have the chance to ask questions of representatives of both the CCL team and the CCP Community team.
Have at look at this thread for details.
Thanks and fly safe. ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Pipa Porto
1194
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 02:27:00 -
[748] - Quote
ISD Suvetar wrote:Hi, Just to give you an update on the Killmail thing. As of right now, the position we're sticking to is that posting killmails leads to trolling, and will be dealt with as an application of forum rule 7. forum rules wrote: 7. Trolling is prohibited. Trolling is the word used to describe a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players. Posts of this nature are disruptive and do not contribute to the sense of community we want for our forums.
You may be pleased to know however, that we've been discussing this internally, a lot. I don't know what the final decision is going to be, but I just wanted to assure you that we're not brushing this under the carpet. Don't forget that there is a ISD seminar for the CCL team tomorrow and people will have the chance to ask questions of representatives of both the CCL team and the CCP Community team. Have at look at this thread for details. Thanks and fly safe.
Has anyone come up with the idea of, say, moderating the trolling posts that you claim posting killmails invariably leads to?
What justification are you using to claim that posting killmails is, in and of itself, "deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players"? So far, the only thing you've posted to back that claim was a subforum rule stating that posting killmails was to be considered trolling in that subforum. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
295

|
Posted - 2012.10.13 02:32:00 -
[749] - Quote
Pipa,
I am not going to get into word games with you about this.
Just wait and see what the CCP Community team comes up with. ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Pipa Porto
1194
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 02:38:00 -
[750] - Quote
ISD Suvetar wrote:Pipa,
I am not going to get into word games with you about this.
Just wait and see what the CCP Community team comes up with.
You're saying that posting killmails is a violation of rule 7. Rule 7 specifically defines what it prohibits. How is asking you to explain how posting a killmail will always fit that definition getting into "word games"?
By the way, specific example of how posting killmails is not trolling: The various miner ganking threads, where miners claimed that they were being ganked regardless of tank. If posting killmails were not allowed, they would be able to keep making that false claim without anyone being able to call them out on the fact that nobody's ever produced a killmail of a heavily tanked Hulk. How is posting killmails to provide evidence of a claim "deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players"? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 27 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |