EVE Search - What does a Minmatar EW specialist sing?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What does a Minmatar EW specialist sing?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Khaldorn Murino	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:12:00 - [31] How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. - "Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." - Unknown Warrior
Khaldorn Murino	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:12:00 - [32] How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. - "Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." - Unknown Warrior
Siddy	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:12:00 - [33] now im going to ask - HOW hard was it to introduce thees changes... err 3 MONTHs earlier? -------------------------------------------
Siddy	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:12:00 - [34] now im going to ask - HOW hard was it to introduce thees changes... err 3 MONTHs earlier? -------------------------------------------
JoKane	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:16:00 - [35] I want what he¦s smoking.
JoKane	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:16:00 - [36] I want what he¦s smoking.
Finix Jaeger	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:21:00 - [37] It's good to have a Minmatar Dev playing with Minmatar guns If this happens I might leave the Ammatar way of life and go back to the Matari one.
Finix Jaeger	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:21:00 - [38] It's good to have a Minmatar Dev playing with Minmatar guns If this happens I might leave the Ammatar way of life and go back to the Matari one.
KompleX	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:26:00 - [39] Originally by: Khaldorn Murino How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. Slow down there! I say tracking to both parts. I can hit frigates with 220MM now, and I like it.
KompleX	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:26:00 - [40] Originally by: Khaldorn Murino How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. Slow down there! I say tracking to both parts. I can hit frigates with 220MM now, and I like it.
Ultrabug	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:31:00 - [41] Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:33:36 Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:32:18 Originally by: Khaldorn Murino How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. I agree, 1400 suffer more of the tracking and RoF than damage imo ! Inverted stats would make more sense to me but wouldn't be enough. Lasers get all the benefits : tracking + RoF + NO AMMO CHANGING TIME. How can you imagine such little changes will balance that ? Why doing more damage if you can't get a hit ??? EDIT : added ammo changing time ! Lasers should have less RoF to balance the reloading time of other turrets.......
Ultrabug	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:31:00 - [42] Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:33:36 Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:32:18 Originally by: Khaldorn Murino How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. I agree, 1400 suffer more of the tracking and RoF than damage imo ! Inverted stats would make more sense to me but wouldn't be enough. Lasers get all the benefits : tracking + RoF + NO AMMO CHANGING TIME. How can you imagine such little changes will balance that ? Why doing more damage if you can't get a hit ??? EDIT : added ammo changing time ! Lasers should have less RoF to balance the reloading time of other turrets.......
Eris Discordia	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:33:00 - [43] Can we fix the blinking lights too? They can get way too hypnotic when your enjoying the good grass Turn your lights down low, and close the window curtain Yeah man I ♥ my pink dreadnought of pwnage Mail [email protected] if you have any questions.
Eris Discordia	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:33:00 - [44] Can we fix the blinking lights too? They can get way too hypnotic when your enjoying the good grass Turn your lights down low, and close the window curtain Yeah man I ♥ my pink dreadnought of pwnage Mail [email protected] if you have any questions.
pardux	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:34:00 - [45] \o/ Fluffy carebear (\_/) (O.o) (> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
pardux	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:34:00 - [46] \o/ Fluffy carebear (\_/) (O.o) (> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
Grimpak	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:39:00 - [47] o yeah jammin! Wub the changes ------------------- Quote: Fragm's Oversized Ego Cannon barely scratches the forums, inflicting omgnoonecares damage
Grimpak	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:39:00 - [48] o yeah jammin! Wub the changes ------------------- Quote: Fragm's Oversized Ego Cannon barely scratches the forums, inflicting omgnoonecares damage
Eris Discordia	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:43:00 - [49] Please reply constructively I ♥ my pink dreadnought of pwnage Mail [email protected] if you have any questions.
Eris Discordia	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:43:00 - [50] Please reply constructively I ♥ my pink dreadnought of pwnage Mail [email protected] if you have any questions.
Dred 'Morte	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:44:00 - [51] it would have been better if you had given 15% more dmg to autocannons and 20% more tracking to artillerys... now 4x 280mm techII on a wolf with maximized skills = 1 frig boom in one volley
Dred 'Morte	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:44:00 - [52] it would have been better if you had given 15% more dmg to autocannons and 20% more tracking to artillerys... now 4x 280mm techII on a wolf with maximized skills = 1 frig boom in one volley
Nafri	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:44:00 - [53] were getting on a good way now nerf geddons damage and we can talk about balanced ships Wanna fly with me?
Nafri	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:44:00 - [54] were getting on a good way now nerf geddons damage and we can talk about balanced ships Wanna fly with me?
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:47:00 - [55] Originally by: Dred 'Morte it would have been better if you had given 15% more dmg to autocannons and 20% more tracking to artillerys yes, maybe that would be a VERY nice solution.
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:47:00 - [56] Originally by: Dred 'Morte it would have been better if you had given 15% more dmg to autocannons and 20% more tracking to artillerys yes, maybe that would be a VERY nice solution.
DarkMatters	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:49:00 - [57] Edited by: DarkMatters on 21/12/2004 16:50:50 Edited by: DarkMatters on 21/12/2004 16:50:09 Edited by: DarkMatters on 21/12/2004 16:49:26 Originally by: Ultrabug Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:33:36 Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:32:18 Originally by: Khaldorn Murino How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. I agree, 1400 suffer more of the tracking and RoF than damage imo ! Inverted stats would make more sense to me but wouldn't be enough. Lasers get all the benefits : tracking + RoF + NO AMMO CHANGING TIME. How can you imagine such little changes will balance that ? Why doing more damage if you can't get a hit ??? Rolling Eyes lasers went from rubbish ( all amarr ships fitting hybrids) to good with a single 5% per ship lvl decrease in cap use. this was because other turrets types simply out damaged lasers for the use of less cap leaving no point in fitting them. the changes suggested are between 15%-20% of diffrent attributes, would it not be better to fully test these increase before nerfing lasers?
DarkMatters	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:49:00 - [58] Edited by: DarkMatters on 21/12/2004 16:50:50 Edited by: DarkMatters on 21/12/2004 16:50:09 Edited by: DarkMatters on 21/12/2004 16:49:26 Originally by: Ultrabug Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:33:36 Edited by: Ultrabug on 21/12/2004 16:32:18 Originally by: Khaldorn Murino How about, testing these stats. Then switching it and giving autocannons the damage increase and the big guns the tracking increase. Because, and it may be only me here, i think that would be more beneficial. As the issue with the projectiles was that they cant hit a barn door. But any positive nerf is something eh? Just a suggestion. I agree, 1400 suffer more of the tracking and RoF than damage imo ! Inverted stats would make more sense to me but wouldn't be enough. Lasers get all the benefits : tracking + RoF + NO AMMO CHANGING TIME. How can you imagine such little changes will balance that ? Why doing more damage if you can't get a hit ??? Rolling Eyes lasers went from rubbish ( all amarr ships fitting hybrids) to good with a single 5% per ship lvl decrease in cap use. this was because other turrets types simply out damaged lasers for the use of less cap leaving no point in fitting them. the changes suggested are between 15%-20% of diffrent attributes, would it not be better to fully test these increase before nerfing lasers?
Hakera	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:49:00 - [59] nah the original change is good, autocannons miss a hell of a lot. Dumbledore - Eve-I.com
Hakera	Posted - 2004.12.21 16:49:00 - [60] nah the original change is good, autocannons miss a hell of a lot. Dumbledore - Eve-I.com

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.