Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Admiral Brown
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 18:30:00 -
[451]
Wait. I've just been reading the posts. Are there seriously people out there who AREN'T looking forward to Incarna. Are you out of your freakin minds? It's going to be more cool Sci-fi eye candy to make the game even more immersive. What kind of a cynical ****ing ******* would you be if you don't look forward to that?
And I don't see how it will mess up PVP unless CCP doesn't have enough server space but I'm pretty sure they have some good computers over there.
I, myself, have been looking forward to Incarna since it was called "Walking in Stations"
I do hope they manage to keep the "sandbox" attitude about Incarna though, so it will be more than just eye candy. I forsee safe and unsafe areas (ie noob and pvp areas) on every station.
And let me just say one more time...DAM IM EXCITED ABOUT INCARNA.
|
Nak hak
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 19:00:00 -
[452]
Don't give a damn about Incarna. Today is just one day closer to my subscriptions running out. CCP don't do refunds(Read their policy.).
EVE is one great community. In the past two years, my favor memories are pvping in a Rifter/Thrusher/Thorax. Fleeting up and landing on some battleships, or T2 hull. Love those Covops pilots. Good times.
I suspect my future will be in a light tank out flanking artillery in WoT.
|
Admiral Brown
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 19:08:00 -
[453]
Is there some reason why you can't whomp on battleships any more?
|
Nak hak
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 19:29:00 -
[454]
Edited by: Nak hak on 21/06/2011 19:37:47
Originally by: Admiral Brown Is there some reason why you can't whomp on battleships any more?
Sometimes they whomp me.
|
Vher Vixxen
Minmatar Megaton m3 Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 20:34:00 -
[455]
Originally by: Admiral Brown
And let me just say one more time...DAM IM EXCITED ABOUT INCARNA.
You know what excited me? After complaining for two years that the contract interface was so bad as to be nearly useless (unless you liked to waste an hour sifting through all the crap without filters and queries), they finally brought out a masterpiece! They did a superb job!
And the point is..............Incarna and new versions are nice and I congratulate CCP for its fine team and drive to expand and broaden a great game, BUT there are more interfaces that need fixed big time and there are tons of bugs that are still hanging around pre-Incarna. If it were me and I ran the show, I would take a full year and drop all R&D and work totally on revamping the interfaces and make the game more play friendly and end the great amount of time doing stupid things, like rearranging windows all the time BECAUSE THEY DO NOT STAY PINNED!
|
Black Cleitus
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 22:40:00 -
[456]
in game options: turn CQ rubbish off- yes turn gameplay on - yes turn massive pointless patch and downtime off- yes
were getting expansions left, right and centre. CCP cant we just play the frackin game? one of the draws of eve was its gameplay and the fact you didnt need a high spec computer to play.
why?
|
DIV Leader
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 23:27:00 -
[457]
MASSIVE FAILSCADE CCP!!!!!!!!
|
DIV Leader
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 23:30:00 -
[458]
Originally by: Ranka Mei Personally, I love CQ! Really do. I have 2 gripes with it, though, that I see become more of an issue over time:
1) I don't like that every CQ is the same. I know I heard it say it was going to be different per race, but on sisi so far they all look alike.
2) I like to be able to customize my quarters. As the novelty of the new environment starts to wear off, I'd like to dress up my rooms a bit. Custom rugs, maybe; custom wall art, etc. Or having the choice between several different design schemes altogether.
It really just feels more immersive to have something that is distinctively 'yours'.
As it wears off?? F$%^ man, it wore off 60 seconds in to it!!! after 90 seconds I was looking for the off button. Incarna is nothing more than eye candy!!!! Give me GAME PLAY!!!!!
|
DIV Leader
|
Posted - 2011.06.21 23:33:00 -
[459]
Originally by: Elijah Godfry Personally i think it would be pretty amazing to have the ability of letting off some steam after mining a couple hours by going to a station and getting into a random barfight/gunfight.
Could we make that happen?
I know i can't be the only one who enjoys a quick FPS gunfight once in a while.
Nothing would be more satisfying than blowing a guy's head off after the ship I worked hard for just got destroyed in lowsec.
ACTUALLY!!!! You do have a GREAT point here. I WOULD LOVE to be able to go in the station and seek out the Fraker camping my station in low sec. No more having to just stay in the station because everyone else is camping it.
BUT, since that's in in the game, FAIL!!! Oh wait, you can't even WALK in station yet. You are stuck to your CQ. Failscading here CCP!!!!
|
Solomon XI
Hidden Souls
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:23:00 -
[460]
So CCP released a crap patch which is literally pushing my CPU to 62C when I ran at max 48C prior with max graphics. Fantastic. WAY TOO MUCH CPU OVERHEAD, CCP! YOU IDIOTS!
Also ... what the hell with only a single variant of the Captain Quarters? Minmatar only?! What a complete load of ****. You tout CQ and don't even release a complete thing. Tsk, Tsk.
And if you DISABLE CQ, we get a static background. What. The. ****? It should take us back to ship spinning! I LIKED SPINNING!
No I am not RAGEQUITTING.
|
|
Andrew Charante
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:26:00 -
[461]
I do not like my feature
|
DIV Leader
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 00:37:00 -
[462]
Originally by: Solomon XI So CCP released a crap patch which is literally pushing my CPU to 62C when I ran at max 48C prior with max graphics. Fantastic. WAY TOO MUCH CPU OVERHEAD, CCP! YOU IDIOTS!
Also ... what the hell with only a single variant of the Captain Quarters? Minmatar only?! What a complete load of ****. You tout CQ and don't even release a complete thing. Tsk, Tsk.
And if you DISABLE CQ, we get a static background. What. The. ****? It should take us back to ship spinning! I LIKED SPINNING!
No I am not RAGEQUITTING.
110% agree. Give us ship pin or at the very least a static ship as I use to have. I LOVED my 500+ FPS in station like that. NOT my pathetic 20-30 FPS while not even fraking moving !!!! Sure I got it up to 60ish with all lowest settings.
This is the WORST patch you guys have come out with yet!!!
The only good thing I can think about that was added in this patch was the agent finder.
However, for those of us that live in WH space, guess what?? You just made us miss most of the day playing and have ZERO added value to us!!!!!!
|
Nik ofFrack
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:30:00 -
[463]
Other's have said it already and maybe if enough of us continue to do so some sanity will prevail at CCP:
In a word, Incarna sucks.
You have destroyed client performance (while docked) with this patch. I would much rather look at a static ship than at a character who can't avoid furniture, bounces off the walls and walks around looking like he failed to make it into WoW.
Please give us the ability to completely ignore this Incarnation of poor performance and unnecessary functionality. Give us a check box that would allow us to simply stay in our ships, as we have always done. What you have created is a step backwards, and a very costly step at that.
In addition to being particularly useless, your Incarna causes yet another delay in docking while it "loads". The obvious work around is to uncheck the check box for "load station environment". It would be very good if that at least simply left us looking at a static ship. Instead, we wind up looking at a static, boring wall. However, dock time is almost zero when you uncheck that box - and the use of our time is really what Eve is all about.
If I want to go walk about, there are plenty of other MMOs out there for that.
I do realize that CCP's primary interest in Incarna is actually real world money: that's obviously why the so called Nobel Exchange uses a new currency that can only be obtained for Plex ... it is a new revenue stream. I might be willing to help CCP's cash flow if I got something in return. However, it is hardly "nobel" to make me pay for poor performance and features that really are quite pointless.
So, shame on you CCP for doing this to a loyal community - the community who, after all, ultimately foot the bill. Every other patch I've experienced has had something delightful at its core. This one does not. On a scale from 1 to 10, this patch, thanks for Incarna, is somewhere below 0 ... so far below that I can't even begin to enumerate it.
So, CCP Fallout, CCP Zulu, CCP Navigator, etc. - how about you give us the ability to turn this off and return to our ships? You can continue to play with this and we'll watch from the comfort of our ships. Maybe one day you'll have something worth our coming out of their hulls. That day is clearly not today.
On the other hand, you could also put the resources to work on bug fixes and on far more interesting updates/extensions that would be core to what makes Eve really Eve. Now, if you are looking for suggestions, the CSM has a list ...
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 01:32:00 -
[464]
Thanks for breaking bridges, CCP!
|
Zandra McHauler
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 03:38:00 -
[465]
Is there anyway to get around the 3d graphic error BS? I don't have the money to by a new computer, and the game worked great before incarna. If not, I want my money back!
|
Ephemeral Waves
Silver Snake Enterprise
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 06:05:00 -
[466]
Edited by: Ephemeral Waves on 22/06/2011 06:04:55
Originally by: Nik ofFrack
In a word, Incarna sucks.
+1, Somebody in Iceland has been snorting a lot of glue.
.
|
rufarus redpirateking
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 07:12:00 -
[467]
still geting the same bugs on tranqulity as i did on sisi still not fixed and ive have this funniest bug on eve ive ever seen my toon is a invisible chost the only way i know where it is is by the flying hair and it took me all of 5 mins to turn off the quters station enviroment like i did in sisi have fun with you dress up girls oh sorry boys any how you dont get to wear them any way my wife tryed to dress her toon in thwe cloths and they are just cargo you cant dress your toons anothor ccp con to get you to buy and pay more for eve then its worth just stick to paying for eve through your account subscription as if you use plex it cost 5 dollars more thats the best eve con ive ever seen and the lag when you have multi clients now is a joke and i have a very up to date syssyetem
|
admaril bluebeard
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 07:16:00 -
[468]
ccp just admit you ****ed up and bring back incursion until you fix this and make it so we can turn of the add ons you made its sucks get use to it you screwed up royaly we have been trying to tell you for moths in sisi
|
admaril bluebeard
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 07:33:00 -
[469]
Originally by: Vher Vixxen
Originally by: Admiral Brown
And let me just say one more time...DAM IM EXCITED ABOUT INCARNA.
You know what excited me? After complaining for two years that the contract interface was so bad as to be nearly useless (unless you liked to waste an hour sifting through all the crap without filters and queries), they finally brought out a masterpiece! They did a superb job!
And the point is..............Incarna and new versions are nice and I congratulate CCP for its fine team and drive to expand and broaden a great game, BUT there are more interfaces that need fixed big time and there are tons of bugs that are still hanging around pre-Incarna. If it were me and I ran the show, I would take a full year and drop all R&D and work totally on revamping the interfaces and make the game more play friendly and end the great amount of time doing stupid things, like rearranging windows all the time BECAUSE THEY DO NOT STAY PINNED!
well you can tel your a female have fun playing dress ups only females would like this patch as its got dress ups so while you girls play with you dolls by the way my misses tryed to dress up her toon she wasted 20 dollars paying for plex she ran me in tears as she realised she made mistake as its just dam cargo shes so ****ed at eve i dont think shell be paying for any more game time ive all ready had my say but after reading this stupid coment i thought id tell you of here experiance soi you girls dont make the same mistake my missies done you cant yose the articles you buy its a con get use too it ccp has coned all you girls and messs with the mens game play and made it so the cpus are burning something shocking on multi account players and i wont be up gradeing i dont even know if ill extend any more the only way ill keep playing if when my subscriptions run out if incarna is still running my accounts wont be have fun with dress up girls us men are switching off this pice of crap quaters and sticking to what game play remains
|
Oberine Noriepa
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 08:34:00 -
[470]
Edited by: Oberine Noriepa on 22/06/2011 08:34:36 Holy Hell! Some of you need to learn how to use punctuation.
|
|
Gothmog
RedBull War Toys
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 08:52:00 -
[471]
PLEASE GIVE ME OPTION TO TURN IT OFF!!
2nd life is cr@p. 2nd life is space is cr@p as well. If some ppl want to do it fine, let them, but let us who dont have option to play Eve how it was. I have zero intrest in walking round a station. Only reason I go in a station is to pick up stuff I have bought or to fit out a ship. Old hanger interface worked great for that. I WANT IT BACK!!
|
Hoertjie
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 09:10:00 -
[472]
Off buttan please. Build it into the next patch to patch this patch. I don't want a feature killing my computer, and i like to spin my ship.
thank you
|
steejans nix
Amarr Black Core Federation
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 11:22:00 -
[473]
Originally by: Gothmog PLEASE GIVE ME OPTION TO TURN IT OFF!!
2nd life is cr@p. 2nd life is space is cr@p as well. If some ppl want to do it fine, let them, but let us who dont have option to play Eve how it was. I have zero intrest in walking round a station. Only reason I go in a station is to pick up stuff I have bought or to fit out a ship. Old hanger interface worked great for that. I WANT IT BACK!!
Damn right, bring back my ship in hanger so i can spin it at least.
|
Modeaus
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 11:32:00 -
[474]
Yay for the "Turn off CQ" checkbox in the options! Even if it does leave you staring at a wall it's better than Sims in space.
That's the only part about CQ I like....I do miss my ship spinning tho.
I didn't care about this update until I saw the turret changes in the dev blog. They do look cool and the add a nice extra touch to game play. They do however need to be fixed on frigs as the turret base is almost always too big. Turrets seem to fit fine on cruisers and above but my Dramiel looks horrible with over sized turret bases hanging over the sides of hard points. My 200mm light ACs don't even fit the Rifter correctly and that was the ship used in the dev blog to explain the updates!
When tractor beams are now PERFECT why cut corners on other turrets?
|
Nikki Sanderson
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 12:27:00 -
[475]
Since CQ is now here and rather unimpressive, I realised why WiS will probably always suck: there is just no way that a company the size of CCP can convincingly build large enough station interiors - stations will either be pretty darn small, or they'll take too long to really build. Just consider that all they got ready for Incarna was one - freaking - room. One!
What we will end up with - if Incarna doesn't go the way of FW etc. - is a handfull of rooms, if we're lucky in different "skins" for all 4 empires, and in no way will it convey how massive and freakingly huge those stations supposedly are. I know that we capsuleers don't exactly mingle with mere mortals, we live in our own parts of stations, but it'll still be disappointing.
|
Robodisca
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 16:30:00 -
[476]
Hey CCP, just wanted to say that I love the Incarna patch! Though there isn't really a purpose to the in station stuff yet (I'm sure that is down the road via Dust, etc.) it looks amazing!!! Turrets are also super sweet now. Love the vision you guys have for eve and want to encourage you to keep up the hard work :) Couldn't really find another place to say this, so hopefully yall will notice.
Best of luck, Robo
|
Pasadenasman
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 16:55:00 -
[477]
Edited by: Pasadenasman on 22/06/2011 16:59:07 Edited by: Pasadenasman on 22/06/2011 16:56:41 The arguments for FAILCARNA was
Immersion So, immersion isn't
A) a single locked room. I call that confinement! To go further, having the same ****ing room no matter the station you dock in the univers is... not immersion !
B) Where are the ****ing toilets ????? In prison you have toilets isn't it?
C) No sounds in a station. I doesn't ear anything in my room. Do the future has sound?
D) My char doesn't want to run. Do the pilots can run in future?
E) I can buy some clothes... oh wait Oo i have to sell my end game ship as you call it (nyx) to buy 3 t-shirt, a pair of glasses and a pair of boots? So i have to trade my end game ship with a beginner wardrobe to follow the direction of the game ? Can't wait for more immersion...
conclusion : Immersion is fail.
New Experience Gaming So, NEG isn't
A)Not overheated CPU to watch a static locked door ? I call that a bug, no more, no less...
B)Not improving the basic content to make it works PERFECTLY since years C)Pay to have a internet space ship game and can't view/spin my ship anymore when docked and have my ship in visual.
D)More useless content
Conclusion : NEG is fail Noble exchange is
A) a shop you can buy a shirt for the price of 2 sleipnir hulls. Do your own opinion.
B) a monocle at the price of a dreadnought. Do your opinion.
C) some content with no utility and with no related background. Do your own opinion.
D) a virtual shop in a virtual game you can really buy a virtual shirt for the price of a really shirt. Do your own opinion.
Conclusion : Noble exchange is fail.
Overall conclusion incarna is fail AND useless. It doesn't really hurt the game mechanic because the game mechanic was failling since the few past patch. You guys ask if incarna was the good direction to head to and i think not, it isn't.
YOUR GAME IS STILL MORE BROKEN I won't pay anymore until a useful extension is coming.
|
Leeluvv
The Black Ops
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 19:46:00 -
[478]
1. Any chance of having the station environment variable set 'per character' and not 'per account'.
2. Any chance of getting an 'invert mouse' button option in CQ, for those of us that grew up with flight sims and know that you have to pull back to go up, not push up.
Originally by: Doctor Mabuse A wife is just a T2 GF. They're more expensive and their resists are higher
|
Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 22:18:00 -
[479]
Edited by: Che Biko on 22/06/2011 22:18:33
Originally by: Leeluvv 1. Any chance of having the station environment variable set 'per character' and not 'per account'.
2. Any chance of getting an 'invert mouse' button option in CQ, for those of us that grew up with flight sims and know that you have to pull back to go up, not push up.
1. I've had seperate setting for my chars for a while now, but only recently did I start using Junction (it's free) to do that. It allows you to create a virtual directory that points to another one. Since EVE stores different settings for each EVE folder, this way you can have different settings for each char, without actually having multiple clients on your harddrive. You only have to have seperate shortcuts, one to folder EVE-A and one to (virtual) folder EVE-B.
2. I think I saw an option like that in the escape menu.
|
UnPaidPiper
|
Posted - 2011.06.22 23:50:00 -
[480]
How about a deployable habitat module that can be deployed in a POS with quarters in it for those in wormholes...no need for the balcony with the ship part...maybe a bubble window with a view...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |