I will go along with costs that reflect the economic reality. My 4 man industrial corp was recently war-decced by a 100 man + Alliance, nothing but an isk shakedown attempt..PERIOD.

Do you actually believe it should cost me a significant amount to dodge that shakedown attempt?

Do you, as a CSM candidate, believe that large entities with more isk, people, assets etc should just be able to grief, bully and/or bankrupt small operations just because they can and have more isk to spend?

And he's right.

So you feel there is no room in this game for small groups of like minded people to just mind their business and do what they want?

These small groups should have to PAY because some large, bored isk rich Corp war decs them to shake them down?

Well they can keep deccing me, and will keep using all available game mechanics to make sure they have wasted their isk, and time.

No KM's, no contact just a little hole in their wallet.

So you feel there is no room in this game for small groups of like minded people to just mind their business and do what they want?

These small groups should have to PAY because some large, bored isk rich Corp war decs them to shake them down?

Well they can keep deccing me, and will keep using all available game mechanics to make sure they have wasted their isk, and time.

No KM's, no contact just a little hole in their wallet.

What is not difficult to imagine is a null-seccer distorting what I said so badly.

I will go along with costs that reflect the economic reality. My 4 man industrial corp was recently war-decced by a 100 man + Alliance, nothing but an isk shakedown attempt..PERIOD.

Do you actually believe it should cost me a significant amount to dodge that shakedown attempt?

Do you, as a CSM candidate, believe that large entities with more isk, people, assets etc should just be able to grief, bully and/or bankrupt small operations just because they can and have more isk to spend?

3. Low sec
Under populated. No unique reason to visit this area in terms of resources but FW is providing much needed life. FW working much better than first implementation but still requires additional iterations.


if I was to prioritise CCPs workload for the coming year based on system security my list would look like this:
1. null sec
2. low sec
3. high sec and worm holes.


low sec is sort of pointless - by default if you own null sec you can use your resources to take low sec so mentally you already own these areas....

to those of us living freely in our own area of the sandbox ask the following:

of a given request for change, who will benefit most?

Lowsec is not underpopulated! Too many of the refugieeGÇÖs from Delve moved into the southern regions; and the FW carnival rides are a mess. Do you spend any time in lowsec?

The only thing we need is more options for GÇ£interactingGÇ¥ with our fellow players, especially the unaware and AFK ones. Perhaps codebreaking options that will enable pirates to steal items directly out of cargo holds, GSCGÇÖs, Moon mining stations, PI installations, or anything else that might be unguarded.

GÇ£Corrupt officialsGÇ¥ would also be cool, they could appear in lowsec and NPC null stations for a limited amount of time and we could mission for them, as a reward we get a few CONCORD free ganks.

But as for GÇ£need to get more people into lowsec!GÇ¥ please do not do that. Everything there is a fight already it only gets more difficult with more people.

Ok. Fair points.

Would u say then that the majority of low sec residents are happy with low ATM then?

Edit: hacking skill. Underused and undervalued. It could be so much more...

Ok. Fair points.

Would u say then that the majority of low sec residents are happy with low ATM then?

Edit: hacking skill. Underused and undervalued. It could be so much more...

Yes yes he ould because its not broken the players are. When you enter the game you are supposed to go attack everything like you have rabies. You wont run out of isk at all. Dont worry about the stupid stuff high sec care bears are worried about. Just go gank something it is fun.

I'm not entirely sure what you are saying here Aza. But I don't think I am the type of player that you think I am. Also lowsec players are very conservative with ISK actually, it is too hard to come by. So attacking things like rabid dog is really not an option, at least for me.

Also GÇ£My miner friends all moved to highsec because mining out here isnGÇÖt profitable.GÇ¥ And GÇ£We all have highsec industrial alts because its more profitable.GÇ¥ Maybe nullsec indi isnGÇÖt designed to be profitable

Hopefully the consequence is that we all decide to invade and destroy the true evil of EVE, highsec.

If you think CONCORD is the best highsec can defend itself with have defending them while they are passive about it, you're wrong.

CCP.

Nerf ganking, Nerf bumping, buff freighters and miners. More, harder

Null is far the more obscenely profittable area in the game.
Ratting, moons, missions, mining, exploration sites, anomalies, PI, options to upgrade systems everything is far more profittable than everywhere esle. And all this in perfect safety. Null sec corporation with the simple passive income can pay not only the sovreignity costs but also ship replacement (even capitals) for all their members, in this way they nullified one of the base EVE concepts: risk/consequences. PvP have no cost for them.

Null sec today (and this process started from Dominion) is the quintessence of perfect carebearing.

They're bored cause they dunno how to spend their ISK. This is why the risk of someone "tempted by the RMT sirens",

What they asking now is to have not only the monopoly of T2 materials (that they already have) but also the monopoly of T2 manifacturing. And all this for free, becuase "hey we're cool" or "becuase otherwise we crash Jita node and harrass CCP".

Every sentence and statement in your post is objectively incorrect.
Please reread this post before resuming posting thanks.

This is what I mean when I say that anything have to be trasversal and cannot be a mere benefits for a minority group. When in the last CSM minute we read a CCP Dev (sorry I don't remember who was now) replying to the CSM "ok this is important for you and what you want but I've to think to what the whole playerbase want and what is best for the game" they say this, and they're right.

So I think any suggestion or idea or request have to be trasversal and care for the several aspect of EvE gameplay, not only for what a specific lobby wants. Sure, one can and say "have to be so cause I'm the more cool players" but this is a teen-agers approach to gaming when we have to discuss implementations (not your case, but many of your same lobby - and sorry for the generalization but I explained why happens - do so).

POSes and POS mechanics only affect a small portion of players.

When an ostrich burries its head in the sand, my gun doesn't vanish; I still shoot it.

That's pretty much the impression I get from this thread.

Focus on null, and no one will notice that there are high sec mechanics that are directly related to many peoples problems with null sec.


I bet you would ingore the stain on your ceiling as well.
Untill your roof falls on you while you're sleeping.

looks like someone actually understands hisec does have an issue that isnt a nullseccer...

honesly its true. Drop hisec's indie slots and one major issue is in check. but it must be done while a nullsec industry revamp happens

There are, in fact, faction spawns, as well as DED-plexes, in high-sec.

Most the high tech stuff can ONLY be made with null moon goo and such.

Hi dosen't need a nerf, there should be some null only stufft that makes up for the for thr difference

[quote=Piugattuk]Those trigger happy guys are the reason I have any decent sales at all. If stuff didn't get blown up, people wouldn't be buying stuff from me.

Indy toon gear gets blown up... his station, his blueprints, labs, hangers, product lines, storage, and supplies go poof.... And take a few days to relocate(he'd be crazy to stay in that spot) a few more to setup his station and lines and weeks or months and weeks to re-research his prints to replace what was lost(or buy HALF his lost prints from contracts of the people that possibly popped him in the first place). Can't just DOCK up and fly out in a fully formed station with all the eminences .

That would be the equivalent of a PVPer getting blown up and loosing half the skill books and SP it took to fly that big cap, super cap. or titan that they love to fly around in blowing up those stations with.

That may be... but Indy toons and gear aren't as easy to replace as PVP gear.

PVP gear gets blown up (in Goofy's voice)" well shucks,(heeyuck) gotta go to the market and get another one (heeyuck)" and you go the market and buy a ship that the indy toon made. Ships are for sale everywhere(maybe not caps, but its POSSIBLE to buy them looking at the ships chat channel).

Indy toon gear gets blown up... his station, his blueprints, labs, hangers, product lines, storage, and supplies go poof.... And take a few days to relocate(he'd be crazy to stay in that spot) a few more to setup his station and lines and weeks or months and weeks to re-research his prints to replace what was lost(or buy HALF his lost prints from contracts of the people that possibly popped him in the first place). Can't just DOCK up and fly out in a fully formed station with all the eminences .

That would be the equivalent of a PVPer getting blown up and loosing half the skill books and SP it took to fly that big cap, super cap. or titan that they love to fly around in blowing up those stations with.

Pretty much everything you describe happens when supercaps and titans are manufactured in nullsec and a rival alliance smashes their CSAA and destroys the titan in build and the blueprint along with it. People didn't stop manufacturing titans and supercaps (god no), nor did building them become unprofitable.