At least it has an auto targeting system.

... What?

It fit in the slot, and I like it for the number of locks added.

It's ok. You're trying to make the best situation out of a horrible ship. We don't blame you.
It just a shame since it's an amazing looking ship... yet I would rather select most tech 1 cruisers going into a PvP brawl.

[Harbinger, New Setup 1]
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Fourier Transform Tracking Program
Fourier Transform Tracking Program
Damage Control II

Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Large F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Script

Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Large 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter

Medium Processor Overclocking Unit I
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

[Zealot, crapfit]
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Tracking Enhancer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Damage Control II

Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Large Shield Extender II

Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Large 'Regard' Remote Capacitor Transmitter

Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Processor Overclocking Unit I

[Phantasm, Missioning]
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Damage Control II

Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Script
Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Script
Tracking Computer II, Tracking Speed Script
Large Shield Extender II

Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Heavy Beam Laser II, Multifrequency M
Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter II
Auto Targeting System II

Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

Vitals:
38k EHP
501 DPS guns
19km optimal with listed scripts
66% stable if chained.

Buffer tanked PvE with chained capacitor? O_o

Whats the point of having a tracking buff on a frigate?

No, not realy.

When the tracking of small guns would be that bad you would not be able to hit anything while using a MWD or flying an Interceptor.

Then simply dont.

Allthoug it is kind of off topic but when you cant handle the transversal either slow down or dont use long range weaponry in closerange combat.

I have jet to see how the AB bonus works but this can make the succubus an interesting interceptor like vessel allthough we have already some pretty good interceptors called ... well ... interceptors.

But a tracking bonus might be a powerfull ability for a battleship, on a frigate you hardly face an opponent that makes this even remotely as powerfull as it is on a battleship. Matter of fact, I have jet to find a target I cant hit in a propperly fittet (i.e. no Railguns without tracking mod) frigate even without tracking bonus.

Well, a tracking bonus for railguns or artillery actually would make sense because out of all the longrange weapons lasers have already the best tracking, hence why you "can" (already) use small beam lasers without tracking mods but "need" to use some on Arty fitts. And even then it is because of range.

A Wolf has, with All V less tracking with artillery than any unbonused beam fitting.


Just saying, out of all the possible boni ingame, a tracking bonus is the least useable on a frigate that already uses the best tracking "longrange" weapons.

Tracking bonuses(Boni is not a word)

It is, but not in english :P


Anyway, when you go for shortrange engagements dont fit longrange weapons and yes, there is such a thing like having to much tracking.

Speaking of the Cruor, when they give the same bonus to the Bhaalgorn, the Bhaalgorn will be totaly OP.

I am talking about the...

"Energy Vampires operate as though your capacitor is empty"

Bonus.

If it's bonuses are in line with the proposed Succubus buff the Phantasm could be in very good shape. Although a few stats will need to be buffed as well.

Whats the point of having a tracking buff on a frigate?

Link?

So the other frigates don't get under your guns? It actually happens with lasers, with even the smallest laser having worse tracking than the largest autocannon. That's even before getting into blasters or the sort. Then add on the fact that things like the Slasher exist with small sigs, high speeds, tracking bonuses, and tracking disruptors make for a very bad day if you can't control them. Speaking from experience here, I've even had Merlins get under the guns of my perfect skilled SFPL Coercer. And my 25% larger sig made it possible for him to track me, even with 6% less tracking. Now imagine those guns on a frigate with a massive afterburner speed boost and a smaller tracking boost in orbit of a target. Not a chance in the world of landing a hit.

Oh, but even if the bonus didn't help with Multifrequency at all, I'd be more than happy if it made Conflagration a more viable choice on a larger variety of targets.



Proposed pirate frigate changes here.
It's also at the end of the last page