| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1038
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 10:32:00 -
[31] - Quote
With regard to the article by poetic...and I quote, "...a very small subset of the entire Eve population..."
So, what exactly is all the fuss about?
Ignore them or gank them. This is not a signature. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5468
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 10:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:With regard to the article by poetic...and I quote, "...a very small subset of the entire Eve population..."
So, what exactly is all the fuss about?
Ignore them or gank them.
They whine on the forums to change the game. They are the ones who have broken the barge lineup and they are the ones who are whining about bumping. Anything that gets in the way of their game time is seen as bad and must be removed even if that thing is a cornerstone of EVE. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1038
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:With regard to the article by poetic...and I quote, "...a very small subset of the entire Eve population..."
So, what exactly is all the fuss about?
Ignore them or gank them. They whine on the forums to change the game. They are the ones who have broken the barge lineup and they are the ones who are whining about bumping. Anything that gets in the way of their game time is seen as bad and must be removed even if that thing is a cornerstone of EVE.
If there are so few of them, and they can make CCP dance to their tune, they seem to me to be really, really good at Eve.
Perhaps the, 'make Eve harder - meaner - tougher', folk should ask them for advice on meta-gaming. This is not a signature. |

baltec1
Bat Country
5469
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If there are so few of them, and they can make CCP dance to their tune, they seem to me to be really, really good at Eve. Perhaps the, 'make Eve harder - meaner - tougher', folk should ask them for advice on meta-gaming. 
They post a lot. We have learned our lesson and now counter them in every post and hit them with real numbers that they cannot counter. They managed to get one change through and nothing else. A change that will be delt with when barges are balanced correctly. |

Dave Stark
1883
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:12:00 -
[35] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:A change that will be delt with when barges are balanced correctly.
i dream of that day. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

EvEa Deva
State War Academy Caldari State
221
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:14:00 -
[36] - Quote
Op I will tell all the people in empire to play your way, o wait they said ***** you |

March rabbit
No Name No Pain
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Jensaro Koraka wrote:It also has unfortunate implications for life in low and null. One of the more striking things I noticed since being back is the complete absence of anyone but other PvPers in low.
exactly. because PVPers made anyone other left these places.
Jensaro Koraka wrote:I hear industry is quite dead in null too. I was also surprised to learn that most people have high sec alts. exactly. because PVPers made running missions/mining/belt running in low/0.0 too danger so anyone smart evades these cursed places.
Jensaro Koraka wrote:Belt piracy used to be a thing, you know. I'd like it to be again some day. I'd also like to be in a low sec corp with a manufacturing division again, if such a thing still existed. Even some of us rabid PvPers like to build something once in a while.
what prevents you from doing this? Organize industry in your corp. Organize mining ops and all this stuff.
Jensaro Koraka wrote:There are missions in low and null. People could do them while the PvPers in their corp camp the gate or patrol, like we used to do in my mining corp. People would interact and help each other and it would be awesome. Or at least it would be if everyone wasn't making piles of ISK AFK in high.
missions in low/0.0 already give more LP and ISK than in empire. Everyone who accepts risk already run these missions. Others prefer lower rewards but higher security. What is wrong here?
Jensaro Koraka wrote:Selling veldspar on the market isn't interacting with other people. It's interacting with the UI. exactly. because this veldspar is sold into NPC buy order and wasn't used by other players to build stuff/resell/etc... |

Dyvim Slorm
Spaceriders Inc.
103
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
While someone is paying their sub they can play as they like as far as I'm concerned.
By the same token they are also entitled to whine on the forums about changing the game as well, everyone else does  |

Dave Stark
1883
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:exactly. because this veldspar is sold into NPC buy order and wasn't used by other players to build stuff/resell/etc...
doesn't matter what's done with the veldspar, but making a sell order isn't interacting with other players. creating a buy/sell order is simply interacting with the ui regardless of who buys it. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

March rabbit
No Name No Pain
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If there are so few of them, and they can make CCP dance to their tune, they seem to me to be really, really good at Eve. Perhaps the, 'make Eve harder - meaner - tougher', folk should ask them for advice on meta-gaming.  They post a lot. We have learned our lesson and now counter them in every post and hit them with real numbers that they cannot counter. They managed to get one change through and nothing else. A change that will be delt with when barges are balanced correctly. I don't know when you started this whine campaign but goons and other whiners make like 99.99% of whine posts in forums since i first visited it.... 
let's say for every 1 anti-suicide gank post i see 10 posts "nerf this, nerf that, nerf whatever bears have!"
|

March rabbit
No Name No Pain
574
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:March rabbit wrote:exactly. because this veldspar is sold into NPC buy order and wasn't used by other players to build stuff/resell/etc... doesn't matter what's done with the veldspar, but making a sell order isn't interacting with other players. creating a buy/sell order is simply interacting with the ui regardless of who buys it. market subforum will like to have word with you 
on a more serious note: you right. ship-to-ship PVP in not interacting with other people too: you only interact with UI by pressing buttons, activating/deactivating modules and all this stuff..... |

Dave Stark
1883
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 11:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:March rabbit wrote:exactly. because this veldspar is sold into NPC buy order and wasn't used by other players to build stuff/resell/etc... doesn't matter what's done with the veldspar, but making a sell order isn't interacting with other players. creating a buy/sell order is simply interacting with the ui regardless of who buys it. market subforum will like to have word with you  they often do.
regardless, i don't have to interact with a single person to sell my minerals. i open the ui and click a few buttons. the fact that buy/sell orders are made by players are irrelevant, i'm interacting with the market window not the player.
if i was making player trades, i would accept the point that there's player interaction, but i'm not making player trades i'm using buy/sell orders. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
277
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:27:00 -
[43] - Quote
Though I disagree with some of it, I thought this conversation and both linked articles were interesting. As it's been stated in these forums 10,000x that all activities in this game except for ship spinning are pvp, it's difficult to believe anyone can still think solo play exists in the sandbox. Regardless of whether a player is mining solo or mission running solo, once he's undocked, he provides opportunities to other players. That simply isn't solo gaming.
And as to whether market activities constitute social participation:
From the Winter 2012 CSM minutes (again) pgs 9-10:
"Two step cautioned that some of these lurkers never truly engage the community, playing exclusively solo.
Unifex replied: Yes, but does that player that is completely on their own, do they buy anything off of the market? Because that is a form of community participation as well. When we talk about a social game, it's not always about having lots of conversations with people. We have to broaden what we consider social participation in a game like EVE."
"He who fights and runs away lives to fight another day." |

baltec1
Bat Country
5469
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:I don't know when you started this whine campaign but goons and other whiners make like 99.99% of whine posts in forums since i first visited it....  let's say for every 1 anti-suicide gank post i see 10 posts "nerf this, nerf that, nerf whatever bears have!"
Wrong.
We reply to their threads and turn it on them to get real problems fixed. |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
502
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:With regard to the article by poetic...and I quote, "...a very small subset of the entire Eve population..."
So, what exactly is all the fuss about?
Ignore them or gank them. They whine on the forums to change the game. They are the ones who have broken the barge lineup and they are the ones who are whining about bumping. Anything that gets in the way of their game time is seen as bad and must be removed even if that thing is a cornerstone of EVE. Been playing since '05 and have seen just as much or even more whines from the other side. So your claim is simply false. In fact, I've seen you yourself whine quite more often than any other one "carebear" in the forums.
Yeah yeah. I know, if it's you making the complain then it isn't a whine. It's only a whine when it's coming from one of those pesky "carebears". |

Dave Stark
1883
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:44:00 -
[46] - Quote
Yonis Kador wrote:Though I disagree with some of it, I thought this conversation and both linked articles were interesting. As it's been stated in these forums 10,000x that all activities in this game except for ship spinning are pvp, it's difficult to believe anyone can still think solo play exists in the sandbox. Regardless of whether a player is mining solo or mission running solo, once he's undocked, he provides opportunities to other players. That simply isn't solo gaming.
And as to whether market activities constitute social participation:
From the Winter 2012 CSM minutes (again) pgs 9-10:
"Two step cautioned that some of these lurkers never truly engage the community, playing exclusively solo.
Unifex replied: Yes, but does that player that is completely on their own, do they buy anything off of the market? Because that is a form of community participation as well. When we talk about a social game, it's not always about having lots of conversations with people. We have to broaden what we consider social participation in a game like EVE."
social participation doesn't mean player interaction.
i agree that using the market is social participation, however in doing so you haven't interacted with a player. they don't have to be online (hell, they don't even have to be aware of it) in order for you to purchase their goods, or for you to sell goods to them.
all you're really doing is saying "player interaction doesn't prove my point, so i'll use a phrase that sounds similar with a totally different meaning to shoehorn my point in here"
if CCP want people to interact, they should give them reason to do so, rather than coining a new phrase and saying "look guys, everything is fine!". i mean, as it stands for me at the moment aside from a few chat channels i don't interact with other players, why would i? there's no reason for me to do so. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2128
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:46:00 -
[47] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: Yeah yeah. I know, if it's you making the complain then it isn't a whine. It's only a whine when it's coming from one of those pesky "carebears".
True.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

March rabbit
No Name No Pain
575
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:March rabbit wrote:I don't know when you started this whine campaign but goons and other whiners make like 99.99% of whine posts in forums since i first visited it....  let's say for every 1 anti-suicide gank post i see 10 posts "nerf this, nerf that, nerf whatever bears have!" Wrong. We reply to their threads and turn it on them to get real problems fixed. wrong.
you not only reply "to their threads". you post in every thread around with the same whines. |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
1225
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 14:54:00 -
[49] - Quote
Yonis Kador wrote:Though I disagree with some of it, I thought this conversation and both linked articles were interesting. As it's been stated in these forums 10,000x that all activities in this game except for ship spinning are pvp, it's difficult to believe anyone can still think solo play exists in the sandbox. Regardless of whether a player is mining solo or mission running solo, once he's undocked, he provides opportunities to other players. That simply isn't solo gaming.
And as to whether market activities constitute social participation:
From the Winter 2012 CSM minutes (again) pgs 9-10:
"Two step cautioned that some of these lurkers never truly engage the community, playing exclusively solo.
Unifex replied: Yes, but does that player that is completely on their own, do they buy anything off of the market? Because that is a form of community participation as well. When we talk about a social game, it's not always about having lots of conversations with people. We have to broaden what we consider social participation in a game like EVE."
And then Unifex stated one of those things the baltec1 of the game still can't understand:
Quote:Unifex reminded the CSM once again that this group, the lurking single players who are already subscribed, are the majority of characters on Tranquility. Essentially the GÇ£social value, or social equityGÇ¥ of a player group increases as you move from left to right (on the whiteboard), even though the size of that player group becomes much smaller in number. In other words, the 10,000 combined instigators and enablers become as equally valuable as the much larger lurking population. Unifex admitted that historically, CCP had not been good at balancing their efforts and servicing all groups.
That little bit of conversation was one of the most interesting things i've read in a while. EVE is Serious Business: You shall not feel entitled to being allowed to play EVE just because you are paying it. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3591
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 15:01:00 -
[50] - Quote
Geez, the number of times this subject has come up in my 3 years of playing......
....but it certainly is always the #1 Tear Generator, that much I know at least. Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.-á-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde - 1870's |

Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
277
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 15:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:social participation doesn't mean player interaction.
Ummm, yes it does. It's pretty hard to be social by yourself. "He who fights and runs away lives to fight another day." |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
502
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 15:16:00 -
[52] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:i agree that using the market is social participation, however in doing so you haven't interacted with a player. they don't have to be online (hell, they don't even have to be aware of it) in order for you to purchase their goods, or for you to sell goods to them. Are you saying that playing the markets is not a form of PVP (Player vs Player)? |

Pandora Barzane
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
41
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 16:26:00 -
[53] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i agree that using the market is social participation, however in doing so you haven't interacted with a player. they don't have to be online (hell, they don't even have to be aware of it) in order for you to purchase their goods, or for you to sell goods to them. Are you saying that playing the markets is not a form of PVP ( Player vs Player)?
nope, Dave still thinks NPC's are making up the marketprices.
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3591
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 16:35:00 -
[54] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i agree that using the market is social participation, however in doing so you haven't interacted with a player. they don't have to be online (hell, they don't even have to be aware of it) in order for you to purchase their goods, or for you to sell goods to them. Are you saying that playing the markets is not a form of PVP ( Player vs Player)?
I say it's become a form of Player vs Bot. Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.-á-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde - 1870's |

Skeln Thargensen
The Scope Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:01:00 -
[55] - Quote
it's kind of ridiculous trying to say there are 'good' carebears and 'bad' carebears. the attitude of players to being engaged unwillingly has no bearing on the outcome.
it is also ridiculous to claim that carebears ruin the game because they will tire of the boring PvE content and unsub and that is a reason to not cater to the PvE players or improve PvE. what is mission PvP currently? some pirate scans you down and jumps in to your mission, scrams, webs and annihilates you because your ship is fitted to passive or active tank waves of rats with specific resists and optimised for cap because of that.
the game actively encourages carebearing. there's no attempt to promote opportune PvP encounters within missions, it's just a massive irritation if you get ganked, especially if the only reason you got ganked was because you were too distracted kiting about 20 rats to spam D-Scan every 5 seconds. I take back my previous statements and judgements of others. -áyou can mine in iteron if you want. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
187
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:29:00 -
[56] - Quote
I like how the commenter "the real one" said:
Quote:Just out of interest, who are these anti-sandbox carebears who are calling for their own special protective area? I honestly don't think I've ever read any blog or forum post or met a player in-game who has been asking for this. I don't read *that* many blogs but I honestly don't recall anyone asking for this feature, otherwise I probably would have replied rather curtly and suggested they consider another game.
Its almost as if these people need to make a up an opponent to bash. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3591
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:44:00 -
[57] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:I like how the commenter "the real one" said: Quote:Just out of interest, who are these anti-sandbox carebears who are calling for their own special protective area? I honestly don't think I've ever read any blog or forum post or met a player in-game who has been asking for this. I don't read *that* many blogs but I honestly don't recall anyone asking for this feature, otherwise I probably would have replied rather curtly and suggested they consider another game. Its almost as if these people need to make a up an opponent to bash.
Indeed I've not seen such a thing in 3 years solid except for obvious NullBear Alt Poasting. Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.-á-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde - 1870's |

March rabbit
No Name No Pain
578
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 18:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: social participation doesn't mean player interaction.
i agree that using the market is social participation, however in doing so you haven't interacted with a player. they don't have to be online (hell, they don't even have to be aware of it) in order for you to purchase their goods, or for you to sell goods to them.
once i've been in 0.0 in LoD alliance. and i've built my own outpost. Then Droneland war occured and LoD evacuated.
I was already in high-sec when that system and outpost were captured. So using your terminology it wasn't player interaction? |

Dave Stark
1883
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 18:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
Pandora Barzane wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:i agree that using the market is social participation, however in doing so you haven't interacted with a player. they don't have to be online (hell, they don't even have to be aware of it) in order for you to purchase their goods, or for you to sell goods to them. Are you saying that playing the markets is not a form of PVP ( Player vs Player)? nope, Dave still thinks NPC's are making up the marketprices.
except i've pointed out that i don't think that. at all.
when buying and selling the fact remains that i do not interact with a person. the fact they made the buy/sell orders are irrelevant. exactly in the same way that when i use a self scan checkout at the shops i don't interact with a person. the market ui window is essentially the self scan checkout equivalent of player trades. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |

Sentamon
713
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 18:44:00 -
[60] - Quote
horribad article ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |